Multiple submissions is not cheating and is not unethical and there's absolutely nothing wrong with it. If the teachers in two different classes assign you the same work they can accept the same work. That's not a failure on the student that's a failure on the curriculum director.
Thanks for the question, Lorie. It's important to know that citations are not always an antidote to plagiarism. If the citations are to the originator of the idea, then they do prevent plagiarism. In the example, though, it's Weaver-Hightower (2011) that originated the idea and collected up all those citations--the "idea" being the summary of what the citations say. If you, as writer, had read the cited works and come to the same conclusion, then the citations would avoid plagiarism. If not, you're taking Weaver-Hightower's idea, not your own.
This is a great video that teaches you many useful skills.
Bass player all over that funk
Multiple submissions is not cheating and is not unethical and there's absolutely nothing wrong with it. If the teachers in two different classes assign you the same work they can accept the same work. That's not a failure on the student that's a failure on the curriculum director.
The revision is still cited. So how is it plagarism if its cited?
\
Thanks for the question, Lorie. It's important to know that citations are not always an antidote to plagiarism. If the citations are to the originator of the idea, then they do prevent plagiarism. In the example, though, it's Weaver-Hightower (2011) that originated the idea and collected up all those citations--the "idea" being the summary of what the citations say. If you, as writer, had read the cited works and come to the same conclusion, then the citations would avoid plagiarism. If not, you're taking Weaver-Hightower's idea, not your own.
What about students who buy a service to do your homework and assignments for you?
It is called contract cheating .