Biological etiologies of PTSD - Abnormalities in the brain

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 1 фев 2025

Комментарии • 4

  • @niryenzina2205
    @niryenzina2205 3 года назад

    Hey! Great video, however, I have a question about a different topic. For biases in thinking and decision making, they ask for only one bias. Could I do heuristics as my "one" and talk about different types of heuristics(i.e anchoring and availability) in an ERQ, with one study for each. Or would that be considered two biases, meaning they will read the first one and ignore the second? In that case, is it better to just stick to e.g anchoring and find two studies that provide evidence for it?

    • @ThemanticEducation
      @ThemanticEducation  3 года назад +1

      That's a great question. I don't know for 100% certain, but I would HOPE that this approach would be OK especially if you clearly identify heuristics as the one type of bias. Also, one would hope that the question would always say "one or more" so it shouldn't be a problem.

    • @niryenzina2205
      @niryenzina2205 3 года назад

      @@ThemanticEducation Thank you so much! Lastly, I read your blogpost on cutting content for the cognitive extension, but I have no clue which studies to choose for my upcoming mocks. Do you have any recommendations of a couple studies that cover everything(if that's not too much to ask for hehe)

    • @ThemanticEducation
      @ThemanticEducation  3 года назад

      @@niryenzina2205 Check out this one, and another for negative and there's one more blog post for positive effects. www.themantic-education.com/ibpsych/2019/01/24/the-negative-effects-of-digital-technology-on-cognition-2-with-key-studies-tv-attention-and-working-memory/