I know im asking the wrong place but does anybody know of a method to get back into an Instagram account..? I was stupid lost my account password. I would love any assistance you can give me
@Niko Creed Thanks for your reply. I found the site thru google and im waiting for the hacking stuff now. Takes quite some time so I will get back to you later with my results.
I am a 440 guy but own both 383's and 440 cars. mpg....My 1968 300 with a 440 TNT was as quick as my then new 6.1 Hemi Challenger! 383 in a C body is like a 5.7 Challenger! I own and owned dozens of nice original B,C&E body Mopars..I restore them too. In a C body 1968 Chrysler(I had a 440 4bbl non high performance 68 300 and a 383 4bbl magnum in a 68 Newport(same car just trim difference) In stock form the 383 high performance aka magnum version was nearly as quick as the base 440 the single exhaust 440 4bbl 350'ish hp version..both had 3.23 gearing.. The 440 TNT(magnum) ate the 383 magnum version,but nonetheless the 383 kicked 400 plus cubic inch Fords easily and most big cube GM vehicles,and was nearly as quick as a single exhaust base 440 350 hp not the mighty 375 hp(420 hp actually they low balled the numbers at the factory like they all did then) They had the 383 2bbl,383 4bbl either single or duel exhaust or the 383 Magnum version(Chrysler&Plymouth was called another name).. I drove 383 & 440 cars as daily drivers in the 90's early 2000's and loved them...I have a 68 Charger RT 440&69 Charger 383 that was a 2bbl rebuilt to 383 Magnum specs and 26 mpg hwy! 16 average city/hwy mix..I had one with a gear venders overdrive and got 18.8 mpg average 28 hwy! So they also are quick and get good gas mileage..It ran 4.8 0-60 and 13.67 in the 1/4 with a stock 383 magnum 3.23 gears..Remember new cars have gearing equal to 5.19's in these old cars lol,so add 5.19's in it I will run low 12's! I still own several C bodies too..Some bone stock some rebuilt and wild!
I have a 69 coronet r/t convertible with a bored out 440 and a 69 coronet hardtop that I'm putting a 383 in. All round the 440 is better but I like the sound of the 383. If you shame one Mopar over another then you ain't mopar.
No doubt about that.Especially the 426 in the mid 1960s rated at just 415hp.They were running 12s off the showroom floor.More like around 500hp and 525tq.
I like these Chrysler Newports. For such a big car, they are not that heavy. A 650 to 750 RPM idle would sound so much better than 1,000 RPM. It sounds like it’s short shifting at about 4700 to 4800 RPM. Adjust the linkage to shift around 5200 RPM and you might pick up a 1/10 of a second or more off your time and get a higher trap speed.
Great time in a C body! for a small cam and very restrictive exhaust! Especially Coupled with a tight converter. It would smack alot of "performance cars!" I have owned 30+ mopar big blocks, from 1958 up. while I like how 383s run, and they are worlds better than a chevy 383, I sure wish I'd bought some more of those "smog" 400s I walked past 30 yrs ago! And some of those cheaper 9.0:1 pistons mopar had for 400s! They are MUCH better engines. I have ran 383s in C bodies (actually only ever raced C bodies) with 8bbl inline, various 4bbl, and long rams (the best) open headers, 4.56 gears and 3000 stall converters. Great top end, but nowhere near as fast as a 440 at the track. My 383 8bbl though posting more hp than a 440+6 in my dad's comparable C body was exactly 1 second slower in the 1/4 but at the exact same speed. It was all in first gear and every time we shifted he jumped ahead from higher rotating mass and then I'd start gaining but just not enough. He consistently did high gear burnouts. 383 2nd was tops. I had 4.56 gears, 6k rpm and he had 4.10 and 5500rpm The converter was looser but stalled the same. He had cc'd at 7.75:1 comp. and a 324deg x .552 lift cam and purely stock 906 heads I had 9.0:1, a 234 deg x .455 cam and port matched heads and intake, he had 1/4" of port shut off from misaligned bolts. That 440 lifted the front tires on a 1968 monaco. We dialed it to within .005 second took alot of trophies in bracket, it also made a "perfect" run. 400s have much better torque. I prefer the 361 and 400 over the 383. The 361 for cooling, and the 400 for cooling (longer water jackets) bottom end strength is many times better and more cubes. But it is TOTALY over looked for good pistons unless stroked so the 383 is cheaper to build. 383s don't make really good strokers, weaker bottoms (but still much tougher than brand x!) and 2" shorter water jackets. If you are interested in hot 383s look at the Desoto 350hp 8bbl versions. Although Still less power than a plain jane 440. (Their 361 was 345 8bbl and more if fuel injected) I had 2 1968 newports, 1 4dr one 2dr. And a 1970 with a 383 8bbl inline, and long rams, and loved it for road cruising and it would walk that 440+6 on the highway in the top end. The long rams broke the tires loose at 120mph, and lifted the front end. The 413 is my favorite for a great balance of hp and torque if you're stuck with factory head castings. Great work! Does it mud up the cooling system? All my 383s did horribly and needed flushed up to 2x a year, the heater cores 3-4 times. Never a problem on 400 and up motors. Great to see and good luck and God bless!
Actually the 383 always a 6.3L not a 6.2L my dad had a dozen of Mopar 383 and it all 6.3L still got 1 left rotten in a 71 Polara 4dr. with the origal sticker saying 6.3L.
@@bobberttv8565 AMC got bought out by Chrysler in the 80s. The Rebel came out in 1970 and took a lot of design cues from late 60s Chrysler C bodies. So it wasn't because they got bought out by Chrysler, they must've just liked the sleek roof design and copied it haha
Ha le 383 Chrysler j ai le même en chevrolets un 383 stroker compresseur wieland mais le mien c est un 6 l 5 bizarre peut être qu ils ont a grandit les cylindres surment vue qu il et monter forger
The 383 engine continues to impress me. That is a pretty respectable time for such a big car.
For it's size, the 383 was always an over achiever. Ya just gotta love 'em.
I know im asking the wrong place but does anybody know of a method to get back into an Instagram account..?
I was stupid lost my account password. I would love any assistance you can give me
@Eugene Javion Instablaster ;)
@Niko Creed Thanks for your reply. I found the site thru google and im waiting for the hacking stuff now.
Takes quite some time so I will get back to you later with my results.
@Niko Creed It worked and I now got access to my account again. I'm so happy:D
Thank you so much, you saved my account!
@Eugene Javion Happy to help :D
Gotta love them old MOPARS
Moves good for such a beast of a car
Sounds good and not bad for such a big boat!!!!
"Betsy" in action. Thanks for that cool video.
Great sound!
440 people are just jealous. 383 is the best Mopar engine ever.
I am a 440 guy but own both 383's and 440 cars. mpg....My 1968 300 with a 440 TNT was as quick as my then new 6.1 Hemi Challenger! 383 in a C body is like a 5.7 Challenger!
I own and owned dozens of nice original B,C&E body Mopars..I restore them too.
In a C body 1968 Chrysler(I had a 440 4bbl non high performance 68 300 and a 383 4bbl magnum in a 68 Newport(same car just trim difference)
In stock form the 383 high performance aka magnum version was nearly as quick as the base 440 the single exhaust 440 4bbl 350'ish hp version..both had 3.23 gearing..
The 440 TNT(magnum) ate the 383 magnum version,but nonetheless the 383 kicked 400 plus cubic inch Fords easily and most big cube GM vehicles,and was nearly as quick as a single exhaust base 440 350 hp not the mighty 375 hp(420 hp actually they low balled the numbers at the factory like they all did then)
They had the 383 2bbl,383 4bbl either single or duel exhaust or the 383 Magnum version(Chrysler&Plymouth was called another name)..
I drove 383 & 440 cars as daily drivers in the 90's early 2000's and loved them...I have a 68 Charger RT 440&69 Charger 383 that was a 2bbl rebuilt to 383 Magnum specs and 26 mpg hwy! 16 average city/hwy mix..I had one with a gear venders overdrive and got 18.8 mpg average 28 hwy! So they also are quick and get good gas mileage..It ran 4.8 0-60 and 13.67 in the 1/4 with a stock 383 magnum 3.23 gears..Remember new cars have gearing equal to 5.19's in these old cars lol,so add 5.19's in it I will run low 12's! I still own several C bodies too..Some bone stock some rebuilt and wild!
I have a 69 coronet r/t convertible with a bored out 440 and a 69 coronet hardtop that I'm putting a 383 in. All round the 440 is better but I like the sound of the 383. If you shame one Mopar over another then you ain't mopar.
Ahem, 426
Love those big block mopars.
That mopar v8 omg
The hp numbers were under rated back then..
No doubt about that.Especially the 426 in the mid 1960s rated at just 415hp.They were running 12s off the showroom floor.More like around 500hp and 525tq.
I'm guessing a 325 hp with aftermarket cam (pretty obvious), headers, gears and slicks. Nice!!!
Nice Chevy killer love it👍
American muscle
Pure
What are your wheel set up , I’m trying to get my fitman like yours
I like these Chrysler Newports. For such a big car, they are not that heavy. A 650 to 750 RPM idle would sound so much better than 1,000 RPM. It sounds like it’s short shifting at about 4700 to 4800 RPM. Adjust the linkage to shift around 5200 RPM and you might pick up a 1/10 of a second or more off your time and get a higher trap speed.
What relocation kit did you use.?
What size of rim and tire sizes are you on ?
Sweeet . Thats what im talkin about
Great time in a C body! for a small cam and very restrictive exhaust! Especially Coupled with a tight converter. It would smack alot of "performance cars!" I have owned 30+ mopar big blocks, from 1958 up. while I like how 383s run, and they are worlds better than a chevy 383, I sure wish I'd bought some more of those "smog" 400s I walked past 30 yrs ago! And some of those cheaper 9.0:1 pistons mopar had for 400s! They are MUCH better engines. I have ran 383s in C bodies (actually only ever raced C bodies) with 8bbl inline, various 4bbl, and long rams (the best) open headers, 4.56 gears and 3000 stall converters. Great top end, but nowhere near as fast as a 440 at the track. My 383 8bbl though posting more hp than a 440+6 in my dad's comparable C body was exactly 1 second slower in the 1/4 but at the exact same speed. It was all in first gear and every time we shifted he jumped ahead from higher rotating mass and then I'd start gaining but just not enough. He consistently did high gear burnouts. 383 2nd was tops. I had 4.56 gears, 6k rpm and he had 4.10 and 5500rpm The converter was looser but stalled the same. He had cc'd at 7.75:1 comp. and a 324deg x .552 lift cam and purely stock 906 heads I had 9.0:1, a 234 deg x .455 cam and port matched heads and intake, he had 1/4" of port shut off from misaligned bolts. That 440 lifted the front tires on a 1968 monaco. We dialed it to within .005 second took alot of trophies in bracket, it also made a "perfect" run. 400s have much better torque. I prefer the 361 and 400 over the 383. The 361 for cooling, and the 400 for cooling (longer water jackets) bottom end strength is many times better and more cubes. But it is TOTALY over looked for good pistons unless stroked so the 383 is cheaper to build. 383s don't make really good strokers, weaker bottoms (but still much tougher than brand x!) and 2" shorter water jackets. If you are interested in hot 383s look at the Desoto 350hp 8bbl versions. Although Still less power than a plain jane 440. (Their 361 was 345 8bbl and more if fuel injected) I had 2 1968 newports, 1 4dr one 2dr. And a 1970 with a 383 8bbl inline, and long rams, and loved it for road cruising and it would walk that 440+6 on the highway in the top end. The long rams broke the tires loose at 120mph, and lifted the front end. The 413 is my favorite for a great balance of hp and torque if you're stuck with factory head castings. Great work! Does it mud up the cooling system? All my 383s did horribly and needed flushed up to 2x a year, the heater cores 3-4 times. Never a problem on 400 and up motors. Great to see and good luck and God bless!
Actually the 383 always a 6.3L not a 6.2L my dad had a dozen of Mopar 383 and it all 6.3L still got 1 left rotten in a 71 Polara 4dr. with the origal sticker saying 6.3L.
Nobody is talking about the fast ass mk2 golf. 14.9 is what they run 0-100km/h stock.
Se moteur si il est preparer en forger il adore le compresseur enfin en chevrolets sur vue que j en avait un
Weird it looks just like the amc rebel
Amc was always known for taking design cues from other companies. Where do you think they got the inspiration for it? This right here lol
@@jaymoe5.7 huh learn something new everyday
@@jaymoe5.7 I figured it was because amc was bought out by chrysler
@@bobberttv8565 AMC got bought out by Chrysler in the 80s. The Rebel came out in 1970 and took a lot of design cues from late 60s Chrysler C bodies. So it wasn't because they got bought out by Chrysler, they must've just liked the sleek roof design and copied it haha
@@jaymoe5.7 ah ok. Can't blame them though chrysler products have always just had an aesthetic to them that appeal to their eras.
Ha le 383 Chrysler j ai le même en chevrolets un 383 stroker compresseur wieland mais le mien c est un 6 l 5 bizarre peut être qu ils ont a grandit les cylindres surment vue qu il et monter forger
A 383 is a 6.3
not bad for a boat anchor.
So is your mom
THAT is real car. not those gay SUV s with a 1.5tfsi engine that sound like shit
Well when you own the trio, ram 3500, 68 charger and the gay suv with a hemi, it is good
First
i can beat him with my 2011 5.0l f150 lolll