Download the preview AMD drivers to get support for Antilag 2 if you have RX 5000, 6000 or 7000 series (only the new ones) Radeon GPUs: drivers.amd.com/drivers/AMD-S...
It's the developers responsibility to ensure that their hardware conforms to industry standards not the service provider. Deviating from hardware standards will most likely result in undesired performance issues.
@@DividedWeFallwell guess what? Forcefully injecting your program into a game isn't industry standard. Why did a feature that came out AFTER CS2 did have to conform to that bs? It was an unconventional method that made it seem like a memory editing software (like Cheat Engine) 100% AMD's fault and no way you can defend them for that.
@@DividedWeFallAmd's Anti-lag works on driver level, unlike Nvidia, which is why it triggered anticheats in so many games. You would know that they changed the system to not work this way with Anti-lag 2, but of course you didn't read the patchnotes and are just talking out of your butt.
When Mihn Lee created the original Counter-Strike people would complain after every update that they were experiencing input lag. In later updates notes he would just add 'fixed input lag' even though he never changed anything. After awhile people stopped mentioning it.
Difference is we have the technology to prove there is input lag or a problem. What is most concerning is that 3klik has 35ms of input latency on a 360hz display at 360+ fps... It should be close to 10-14ms. Testing muzzle flashes in this game is variable and delayed however, not a good source.
@@griffin1366 he literally was testing an RX 6500 XT with an i3 12100. It’s only his monitor that’s running at 360 Hz, not his framerate. Said setup barely even run CS2 at more than 60fps at 1440p. Watch the video.
@@element7448 i still guaranteed crash at least once per anubis game when i go near the ct spawn water, and sometimes in ancient, but the other maps are fine now
Hey 3kliks, would you be willing to make a video about the state of CS2's performance? There's 3 specific things I can point to that are drastically impacting performance in-game currently. (Though I'm sure more would be revealed upon investigation...) 1: Molotovs, especially on high Model/Texture detail, destroy FPS normally (300 to 240 fps average), but it's nearly unplayable while using a scope. (300 to 100 fps average) This is really noticeable in situations like holding banana on inferno or cat on Dust II while there's a molotov burning. Lowering the Model and Texture quality helps a bit, but it's still costing like 50% of your performance while double scoped looking past a molly. The new CT molotovs are much much worse. Dropping me from 300+ FPS to under 60 if you have to get the scope any where near it. 2: Viewmodel. I looked for a while to find the video I saw, but I haven't been able to find it yet. But it was demonstrating the amount your viewmodel costs in terms of performance. I believe the conclusion was around 15% of your total frames are lost when rendering the viewmodel. (They also demonstrated slight improvements when using a lower FOV viewmodel, as well as demonstrated that it was indeed the viewmodel by simply disabling it) 3: Opening the scoreboard, as of the more recent updates, now takes away 50% of my FPS instantly. From 300 to 150, sometimes even worse than that. Edit: You can use cl_radar_square_with_scoreboard 0 to get a big boost back, but the scoreboard will still eat FPS for no good reason when open. But this keeps it in the 200s for me (in a solo Mirage map) rather than low 100s. I've emailed the cs2team@valvesoftware email outlining these issues. The moltov issue I reported and demonstrated back in January. It's never been addressed. And still persists today even after the updated molotovs. It's my hope that if you make a video outlining these concerns, they will address them quickly. Thanks again for all your great coverage of CS over the years!
@@Biggie971 Man, honestly if they switch to a 128 tick-rate + good anti-cheat the game will be in a much more better state. But I honestly can't think of what valve is prioritizing at the moment.
It’s funny to see how little people know about game development when they complain about minor updates like these. They think the whole team is involved somehow. In reality amd probably contacted valve about this new feature and they put 2 guys from the source 2 engine team to implement it. The animators, 3d artists and others are already working on the next operation and new features
@yeehaw142 Yes, of course, and if a game isn't updated every week, it is a dead game, right? You'd be surprised how much time it takes to create content that players blast through in less than an hour. Would guess that the development time for a single co-op mission for an operation is 6-9 months at minimum. Maybe more
I play on steam deck, just updated yesterday and noticed the game feels way more responsive, and now looking into the details of the update I realise why. It is not a homeopathy, it is a real game changer for me.
I learn so much about FPS and latency while playing the earlier BF2042 updates. That was the time I realised FPS is not the be all and end all when it comes to gaming. I realised that I'd rather play at 60 FPS with a low latency than 120 FPS with a high latency. From what I rememberd, a latency above like 30ms is where stuff can start to get ugly (even more som with lag spikes). But numbers below 30ms is mostly fine.
ive installed the drivers and ive been liking anti lag 2 on the 7800 xt so far. only issue i encountered is that its not available when youre running cs2 in vulkan.
You shouldn't be running Vulkan version on Windows anyway since it's heavily single threaded and AMDVLK doesn't run well, and of course AMD makes their new technologies DirectX first.
Is anti-lag useless when your gpu doesnt struggle? For example i have 6800xt and i play on low graphics. I get around 300fps usually. Does enabling anti-lag drops my frames and increases my response?
Philip can you please make a video on your alt channel to about AMD's driver crashes on OpenMW? I just wanna play morrowind but feeling like I'm gonna have to return a freaking 7900 XTX Nitro and go Nvidia just to do it
Its actually extremely useful for this specific game for me. As ADSL internet "enjoyer", since cs2 released and replaced csgo i had to deal with my upload bandwith not being enough for CS2 when player count on the server goes higher than 7-9 people. So on empty server my fps is 150-190, and on completely full 20 people dm server my internet is the system bottleneck and perofromands drops up to 50-60 fps, and the input latency becomes horrible. So untill i get better internet, thats my only solution for dealing with extremely volatile input latency.
Sorry to break it to you, but getting a better internet connection will not improve your framerates and input latency. For the game's engine itself, sending network packets and receiving the ones that are available is extremely cheap on any modern computer, and with less bandwidth it actually even means there are less packets that you can possibly receive, which would increase your FPS instead if it mattered. You're getting significant FPS drops because there are 19 other people on a server; each one is a separate set of game entities, including the player model, and the weapon models, and all the animation processing on those models, particles, etc, which do add up. For proof of what I'm saying: try joining a full server like that, and then physically disconnect your network connection. At this point in time, your internet will be infinitely worse than ADSL, i.e. nonexistent entirely, and yet the game will be exactly just as responsive regarding mouse movement, and will not freeze up. Of course the connection to the server will be lost, and your game will automatically disconnect after a visible timer, but the game engine itself will not freeze and your FPS will remain the same lol
@@Architector_4 Buddy i dont know why you are telling me my connection is not the problem when i know for sure it will. I tried playing on mobile internet from my phone and while ping was way too high, i had enough bandwith to not drop any frames because of the connection, it was smooth 130 fps experience all the time, just with very volatile ping (115+ and rising).
Does anyone know if this driver is safe for faceit? From what I understand anti-lag hooks into the game to be able to work, thus causing initial controversial valve bans, but never anything about faceit. Thanks!
just think, how can gpu driver cause any ban now? AMD earlier was just hooking DLL to game to get that lower latency, now its implemented in game with valve devs
Finally, I can play inferno. The latency issue in inferno was too bad for my RX 6400. Whenever an enemy comes in front of me on inferno, latency just jumps from 15 ms to 250 ms.
@@3kliksphilip I'll have to check. CS2 is uninstalled right now since I was playing AC Origins primarily. I'll install tomorrow and update you here regarding the performance effect I've noticed.
@@3kliksphilip I have checked it. This is the most playable inferno has been for me ever since the release of CS2. For the most part, Latency didn't cross 45 ms. However, I have this problem going on for quite a long time. The longer I play the match on inferno the more latency spikes I get. The match was smooth for the first 20 rounds, then I received spikes. Other than that, all good
Weird, i have RX7800 XT, updated all my drivers, updated game, verified files but still in cs2 i dont have any option to activate that anti lag, i can only activate first one in amd software..
Why can't I see anti-lag 2 in the menu? I have a relatively new AMD GPU, a RX 6700XT and just updated the drivers. Edit: Oh I need to download a beta driver? 1:35
"if you have RX 5000, 6000 or 7000 series (only the new ones) Radeon GPUs" Phil, I don't know how to tell you this... but the 5000 series is 5 years old now
bruh i dropped to like 100 fps after the newest update and i was like wtf going on, so i had to update my drivers and after i enabled anti-lag it went to 400 fps WTFFFF i have never had 400 fps before only like 200.
are you sure you tested this under identical conditions? a different map or especially if you played offline vs bots the framerate could be way higher than in a real match.
@@forasago no it was on same map mirage on competitive and i immediately noticed frame difference from before the update vs after the update. new drivers very good on amd.
Игры
Thanks for the sacrifice of writing a video when a new update just came out
The madman already had the video ready, he is truly all knowing
Takes the man 10 minutes since he’s taking all the information and imagines from other people who did the work
@@giannibal Never doubt philips foresight he shall never be beaten in the time to respond
Looks like they learnt their lesson from last time and actually worked with the devs for this one to not trip the VAC.
It's the developers responsibility to ensure that their hardware conforms to industry standards not the service provider. Deviating from hardware standards will most likely result in undesired performance issues.
@@DividedWeFall In the case of Anti-lag + case AMD did something that nobody else does, for good reason.
@@DividedWeFallDidn't you know that Anti Lag+ also triggered ban on Titanfall 2 and Call of Duty Warzone?
@@DividedWeFallwell guess what? Forcefully injecting your program into a game isn't industry standard. Why did a feature that came out AFTER CS2 did have to conform to that bs? It was an unconventional method that made it seem like a memory editing software (like Cheat Engine) 100% AMD's fault and no way you can defend them for that.
@@DividedWeFallAmd's Anti-lag works on driver level, unlike Nvidia, which is why it triggered anticheats in so many games.
You would know that they changed the system to not work this way with Anti-lag 2, but of course you didn't read the patchnotes and are just talking out of your butt.
Bro missed vertigo wall hole
He's probably leaving it for a comprehensive map change video like the ones he often does.
played three matches on that, plays nicely
Bro missed the second video
Philip doesn't miss
@@nisseost1 Phil never uploads to inconvenient times, he uploads when it's the right choice
When Mihn Lee created the original Counter-Strike people would complain after every update that they were experiencing input lag. In later updates notes he would just add 'fixed input lag' even though he never changed anything. After awhile people stopped mentioning it.
i think it was just normal lag, and he changed the value of the ping lower and people stopped complaining.
@@FlamingMissile you're exactly right. He just faked the latency.
@@FlamingMissile oh yeah i've heard that one
Difference is we have the technology to prove there is input lag or a problem.
What is most concerning is that 3klik has 35ms of input latency on a 360hz display at 360+ fps... It should be close to 10-14ms.
Testing muzzle flashes in this game is variable and delayed however, not a good source.
@@griffin1366 he literally was testing an RX 6500 XT with an i3 12100. It’s only his monitor that’s running at 360 Hz, not his framerate. Said setup barely even run CS2 at more than 60fps at 1440p. Watch the video.
Oh man bad timing for an update video
?
@@griffin13662am
Why?
@@OnBean-qe1vf because he uploaded before fire sale, and he forced to woke up and explain in short time
I love you
damn this vertigo update is crazy... oh wait
Thanks for covering this! I have a 7900xtx but i am certain this will still improve my gameplay!
Sorry to burst your bubble a bit, but it won't, at least in your case
I have the same. Did you have crashing problems with cs2? Mine got rarer with time.
If you are already getting hundreds of fps I doubt it will help.
@@element7448 i still guaranteed crash at least once per anubis game when i go near the ct spawn water, and sometimes in ancient, but the other maps are fine now
You'll get global now 🤑
Hey 3kliks, would you be willing to make a video about the state of CS2's performance?
There's 3 specific things I can point to that are drastically impacting performance in-game currently. (Though I'm sure more would be revealed upon investigation...)
1: Molotovs, especially on high Model/Texture detail, destroy FPS normally (300 to 240 fps average), but it's nearly unplayable while using a scope. (300 to 100 fps average) This is really noticeable in situations like holding banana on inferno or cat on Dust II while there's a molotov burning. Lowering the Model and Texture quality helps a bit, but it's still costing like 50% of your performance while double scoped looking past a molly. The new CT molotovs are much much worse. Dropping me from 300+ FPS to under 60 if you have to get the scope any where near it.
2: Viewmodel. I looked for a while to find the video I saw, but I haven't been able to find it yet. But it was demonstrating the amount your viewmodel costs in terms of performance. I believe the conclusion was around 15% of your total frames are lost when rendering the viewmodel. (They also demonstrated slight improvements when using a lower FOV viewmodel, as well as demonstrated that it was indeed the viewmodel by simply disabling it)
3: Opening the scoreboard, as of the more recent updates, now takes away 50% of my FPS instantly. From 300 to 150, sometimes even worse than that. Edit: You can use cl_radar_square_with_scoreboard 0 to get a big boost back, but the scoreboard will still eat FPS for no good reason when open. But this keeps it in the 200s for me (in a solo Mirage map) rather than low 100s.
I've emailed the cs2team@valvesoftware email outlining these issues. The moltov issue I reported and demonstrated back in January. It's never been addressed. And still persists today even after the updated molotovs.
It's my hope that if you make a video outlining these concerns, they will address them quickly.
Thanks again for all your great coverage of CS over the years!
We need vac 2
Valve: We introduce you VAC 2, 2 times more useless.
@@Biggie971 Man, honestly if they switch to a 128 tick-rate + good anti-cheat the game will be in a much more better state.
But I honestly can't think of what valve is prioritizing at the moment.
@@nadir4562 of course you dont know, you still talk about 128 tick servers. No wonder you dont know what is going on.
It’s funny to see how little people know about game development when they complain about minor updates like these. They think the whole team is involved somehow. In reality amd probably contacted valve about this new feature and they put 2 guys from the source 2 engine team to implement it. The animators, 3d artists and others are already working on the next operation and new features
they think the whole team is involved somehow. in reality nobody at valve is doing anything at all
@yeehaw142 Yes, of course, and if a game isn't updated every week, it is a dead game, right?
You'd be surprised how much time it takes to create content that players blast through in less than an hour. Would guess that the development time for a single co-op mission for an operation is 6-9 months at minimum. Maybe more
@@AkillesOfSwedenahhhh no!!! The truth! It hurts!!!! Must…. Stay…. NEGATIVE!!!! AHHHHHH
Cool, would really like to see a comparison with nvidia technology.
I play on steam deck, just updated yesterday and noticed the game feels way more responsive, and now looking into the details of the update I realise why. It is not a homeopathy, it is a real game changer for me.
Opinion on Vertigo catwalk?
I like your videos more Cs1.6 map videos?! I love your 1.6 cs mapping videos please more!! ❤❤
Man Anti-lag 2 is such a big improvement on Anti-lag:Global offensive.
You should do a comparison video with Anti-Lag 2 vs Reflex when Anti-Lag 2 gets to the public.
I learn so much about FPS and latency while playing the earlier BF2042 updates. That was the time I realised FPS is not the be all and end all when it comes to gaming. I realised that I'd rather play at 60 FPS with a low latency than 120 FPS with a high latency. From what I rememberd, a latency above like 30ms is where stuff can start to get ugly (even more som with lag spikes). But numbers below 30ms is mostly fine.
Waiting for comparison with Nvidia Reflex
Reflex implementation is still ass in cs2. Correct me if im wrong
AMD wouldn't want it compared, as its going to be inferior to Reflex, just as with any other AMD GPU feature couple generations behind Nvidia.
@@Runeberg265what features exactly is a couple of generations behind? nvidia cards are 1 gen behind amd gpus in vram tho
Good timing, i have an nvidia damn gpu now... not using antilag anymore
1:05 Iconic
What program are you using to see your mouse input lag?
The chicken update.
The display port is just a different colour USB port. Plug your mouse in to your GPU for zero input lag.
I have the AMD 7900 XTX GPU paired with AMD 7800 X3D CPU. I wonder if the Anti lag 2 feature will be helpful for me.
Yeah, imagine going 1000 days without an operation... *cries in tf2*
😭
ive installed the drivers and ive been liking anti lag 2 on the 7800 xt so far. only issue i encountered is that its not available when youre running cs2 in vulkan.
You shouldn't be running Vulkan version on Windows anyway since it's heavily single threaded and AMDVLK doesn't run well, and of course AMD makes their new technologies DirectX first.
But what now will i blame my skill issue on
So people were pissed because of this update just for valve to troll them and release a huge update the day after
CT BLUE FIRE VIDEO INCOMING
I have an nvidia gtx 1650, but for some reason nvidia reflex doesn't show up in the settings menu
thank u philip
definitely a step toward VAC being more secure... still a looooooong way to go, in a galaxy right the frig here.
This made my mouse input feel better than in CS:GO
I have updated csgo and have a 6600xt it doesn't show AL 2 for me
@@kratazzgaming2786 you need to download the preview driver
@@kratazzgaming2786u probably need to update drivers
@@kratazzgaming2786 you have to download the amd driver separately.
@@kratazzgaming2786 you need driver son.
And rentable cases
Antilag 2 does not appear on the Linux version as far as i can see sadly,
RX 7900xtx and R9 7950x3d for refrence.
because you need those preview drivers which arent on linux afaik
@@krspy1337 Thanks for letting me know
finally no need to upgrade to nvidia gpu
I have actually tested it and it i can feel the difference, especially when frames drops.
Is anti-lag useless when your gpu doesnt struggle?
For example i have 6800xt and i play on low graphics. I get around 300fps usually.
Does enabling anti-lag drops my frames and increases my response?
well if your gpu doesnt struggle then you should already have low latency since it means that cpu does the job
Good update tbf
Good update
Thanks Steve, i mean AMD and Gaben
i have amd rx 6600 and i still didnt get update for anti-lag 2 any advice ? I reinstalled amd software etc . updated
Does it makes difference on steam deck?
so it should work with my rx 6750 xt but i have to download the driver preview or wait for the release?
Yes, need to download the driver, but if you can wait, just wait.
Don't forget to DDU your old driver.
@@dagnisnierlins188 thank you!
I have a 5600 XT but the setting doesn't show up after installing the drivers?
Team Radeon go strong
Philip can you please make a video on your alt channel to about AMD's driver crashes on OpenMW? I just wanna play morrowind but feeling like I'm gonna have to return a freaking 7900 XTX Nitro and go Nvidia just to do it
Has this issue been reported to OpenMW's developers? Maybe they can do something about it lol
With every update, there will always be someone with the "you could have done more" take.
Its actually extremely useful for this specific game for me. As ADSL internet "enjoyer", since cs2 released and replaced csgo i had to deal with my upload bandwith not being enough for CS2 when player count on the server goes higher than 7-9 people. So on empty server my fps is 150-190, and on completely full 20 people dm server my internet is the system bottleneck and perofromands drops up to 50-60 fps, and the input latency becomes horrible. So untill i get better internet, thats my only solution for dealing with extremely volatile input latency.
Sorry to break it to you, but getting a better internet connection will not improve your framerates and input latency. For the game's engine itself, sending network packets and receiving the ones that are available is extremely cheap on any modern computer, and with less bandwidth it actually even means there are less packets that you can possibly receive, which would increase your FPS instead if it mattered.
You're getting significant FPS drops because there are 19 other people on a server; each one is a separate set of game entities, including the player model, and the weapon models, and all the animation processing on those models, particles, etc, which do add up.
For proof of what I'm saying: try joining a full server like that, and then physically disconnect your network connection. At this point in time, your internet will be infinitely worse than ADSL, i.e. nonexistent entirely, and yet the game will be exactly just as responsive regarding mouse movement, and will not freeze up. Of course the connection to the server will be lost, and your game will automatically disconnect after a visible timer, but the game engine itself will not freeze and your FPS will remain the same lol
@@Architector_4 Buddy i dont know why you are telling me my connection is not the problem when i know for sure it will. I tried playing on mobile internet from my phone and while ping was way too high, i had enough bandwith to not drop any frames because of the connection, it was smooth 130 fps experience all the time, just with very volatile ping (115+ and rising).
@@Architector_4 he won't get it
@@krspy1337 eh, fair lol
i remember writing a sending a response saying basically that here, but it seems to be gone now; oh well
Yeehaw
Where is that thumbnail from? Is it AI or just a photo?
That view model 💀
i just wish the fix vac and remove the 0.5 sec stutters i get when an enemy turns the corner instead of adding features.
how do you see the latency (input lag i think) as here? 1:50
It requires a special monitor and supported mouse. See my latency testing video (linked at the end) for specifics
do u need an amd cpu?
do you HAVE to have a amd gpu? i have amd cpu 7800x3d with GTX 1080 ti and after downloading still not showing up... no idea why
yes, just use reflex on nvidia it's better lol
just use nvidia reflex if you have nvidia gpu it's better anyways
yes its for amd gpu's only
@@swuspicious how better is it? i would like to see the difference
Black bread is good.
cool
В новой обнове воткнули утюг?
Operations add content, CS2 removed content
.... I cant find the option after updating to the new drivers?(on a 6800XT)
@Devilaxes same problem(6500xt)
Now if the game only stopped crashing. That would make me a lot happier than any operation.
me thinks you forgot something, philip
Now here’s hoping for antilag integration on Linux :)
I doubt we'll get it in the open source driver, that's the one big issue with having one.
Even if I have a AMD Radeon RX 7000 series I do not see this setting in the menu. What could be the reason? Driver up-to-date.
You need to download the technical preview.
Does anyone know if this driver is safe for faceit? From what I understand anti-lag hooks into the game to be able to work, thus causing initial controversial valve bans, but never anything about faceit. Thanks!
just think, how can gpu driver cause any ban now? AMD earlier was just hooking DLL to game to get that lower latency, now its implemented in game with valve devs
First to ask kliksphillip to cover Lossless Scaling 2.8 Frame Gen
didn't think i would see you here
Finally, I can play inferno. The latency issue in inferno was too bad for my RX 6400. Whenever an enemy comes in front of me on inferno, latency just jumps from 15 ms to 250 ms.
How does it perform now?
@@3kliksphilip I'll have to check. CS2 is uninstalled right now since I was playing AC Origins primarily. I'll install tomorrow and update you here regarding the performance effect I've noticed.
@@3kliksphilip I have checked it. This is the most playable inferno has been for me ever since the release of CS2. For the most part, Latency didn't cross 45 ms.
However, I have this problem going on for quite a long time. The longer I play the match on inferno the more latency spikes I get. The match was smooth for the first 20 rounds, then I received spikes. Other than that, all good
Guess you've just got to win sooner then ;)
i download the anti lag 2 and on it.But my in game video setting Didn't show anti lag option ,what should i do?
Download link aint working
I'm enjoying PUBG more. And UE5 upgrade is coming. You should dive back into PUBG!
i download anti lag n on it from gpu.but my in game video setting didnt show anti lag option ,what should i do?Rx6500xt gpu(driver uptaded)
you need to download the driver that is in the description, normal driver won't work
How to enable it on rx 6800xt?
I think this New update changed how fidelityFX super resolution works, it looks blury now.
It always looked awful
thats FSR 1 which is spatial upscaler not temporal like FSR2 or DLSS or XeSS
if anti lag is so great, why isn't there an anti lag 2?
HOOOOOLY SHIT
because the anti lag that is in driver is shit, anti lag 2 is what is supposed to be
Finally CS2 update
Yo
Bro basically said "Get banned legally"
i finally can play cs2 in 30 fps!
Cool i guess (i wanna comment just cuz i was early)
Weird, i have RX7800 XT, updated all my drivers, updated game, verified files but still in cs2 i dont have any option to activate that anti lag, i can only activate first one in amd software..
yeah you have to download the preview that he linked in the description (if I understood correctly)
@ProgazQQ also about that, link doesn't work :D
@@coolymlg oh :D
@@coolymlg so you didn't download the preview drivers then
@krspy1337 yup, now I figured it out, I just need to google "anti-lag 2 amd" and it will give a site with link to driver
Why can't I see anti-lag 2 in the menu? I have a relatively new AMD GPU, a RX 6700XT and just updated the drivers.
Edit: Oh I need to download a beta driver? 1:35
me too, did you got it?
me too can't see anti lag 2 in option in game
@@sabitaney i repair that
Release note: 3 minutes
Release notes: 30 seconds
BIG
Now where is Intel?
When I start CS2 on my Intel Arc GPU... It limits my monitor to 120hz and ycbcr 422... Yeah I am sure it's a year or two away
a770 runs fucking nice in this almost at my 1080ti 2080ti 6800xt i had
they really added cbf to cs2 dawg 😭
"if you have RX 5000, 6000 or 7000 series (only the new ones) Radeon GPUs" Phil, I don't know how to tell you this... but the 5000 series is 5 years old now
Can you talk about the rent skin situation
he did a short update video but said he had to sleep so I think we will get that in a few hours
3kliksphillips luck ;'D
On this day the rx 580 became sad.
that trash old card is now 7 years old lol
i have a 7700xt and there isent anti lag option in cs
you have to download the preview that he linked in the description
still no option in game
@@MrJonesITA sorry then
Missed opportunity at the end to say "Check out this video that you haven't experienced in 183 days"
You mentioned Steam Deck twice, yet it's on Linux and AMD don't have AL on Linux.
you sound like Britec09
this is a game changer man the game feels 10x smoother for me, im on a 7800xt and 7800x3d.
That is a bit wierd, your PC is so strong this feature should really not be noticeable..
@@kimkong86 placebo effect perhaps.
@@deadruins Maybe he plays in 8k ultrawide
bruh i dropped to like 100 fps after the newest update and i was like wtf going on, so i had to update my drivers and after i enabled anti-lag it went to 400 fps WTFFFF i have never had 400 fps before only like 200.
are you sure you tested this under identical conditions? a different map or especially if you played offline vs bots the framerate could be way higher than in a real match.
@@forasago no it was on same map mirage on competitive and i immediately noticed frame difference from before the update vs after the update. new drivers very good on amd.
Valve where is the anticheat?
anyone plays cs2 4k?
stop glazing valve
Why i dont have this option?
same