Well handled by the crew, as always, because they (and every other twin engine crew) know that their plane will get them back on one engine. And every pilot has spent time on the simulator flying with an engine failure.
I was on this flight and scared shitless. I was up in Business Class so luckily couldn't see any of it but the bangs were terrifying to this white knuckle flyer. I can't fault how flight attendants or pilots handled any of the flight but Delta sure didn't handle it well once we were on the ground. Nobody told us anything beyond "You'll get a new gate'. No information for those of us who would miss connections. Really, really poor communication and customer service on Delta's part once we got to the gate.
It’s very hard to determine all that. you’ve got 20 minutes to get back around and 200 something people to deal with not to include you still need a gate bc it may be occupied. So no it isn’t a poor performance on delta. You’ve got idk how many aircraft in the sky at once
@@cruzelife6510 Yeah, they can't exactly tell you something they don't even know yet. There are other people who make the calls there, not the flight attendants. They're trained to handle emergencies and that's what they did. The rest was someone else's job.
I saw this happen last night. A couple loud explosions then I ran outside and saw the left engine on fire. Crazy situation glad everyone was ok. Always fly Delta.
I've been on one that similarly had an engine go after take off. The 5 or so seconds after the "bang" occurs is the scariest part because it could be anything at that point.
Two observations: 1. Nice to see crew use proper call sign “Delta 105 Emergency”; and 2. Note - even with an engine failure, they took 20 minutes to run checklists and maintain stability for landing. Sad the same couldn’t be said for the Jeju Air crew.
We don't know the full situation of the jeju air crew and what they had going on so its better not to pretend they did the right thing or the wrong thing until we have the final report stating the entirety of the facts
Suggesting without any prove (at this point) that its purely pilot error for jeju flight is insanity. Considering all the things you can see from the crash landing they had no lights on and no flaps/gear at least points to critical hydraulic failure, at least one engine gone, shorter runway due to maintenance etc..
Looks like it, yes. Last time RR had issues on these were with the compressor blades and FAA issued an AD in 2021. This plane is only 4 years old and its engines should have been inspected under the AD but no major overhaul I guess because way too few hours. Maybe they considered the blades were fine and now, well, they were not. Or maybe it was a birdstrike. Delta, Airbus and RR will find out. Let us wait. :)
@@MaVaLa-um2luThere have been issues in the meantime that RR published fixes for before ADs were nessesary. Delta is extremely pro-active when it comes to staying on-top of those things. Regardless, the 7000 is a realitively new engine by aviation standards & like the Leap 1Bs & the P&W GTFs, there are simply unforseen issues that are still being discovered as engines across the world build up their hours beyond what RRs initial testing could have accounted for. Like the older GE & PW engines, the kinks will be ironed out by the engineeres in time.
Well handled, near perfect, I appreciate this. However, only a minor thing, but: "We're gonna declare an emergency at this time" is just so wild and yet so absolutely common. Use the international wording please. This needs to be addressed to and resolved by FAA and the Airlines, the pilots are just not trained (enough) towards this, no blame on them. Do "Mayday" or "Pan-Pan". And high attention transmissions at best come as a tripple to emphasize them. So in this case 3 times Mayday or 3 times Pan-Pan. It is just this.
I feel like the FAA just has bigger problems on there hands. In most incidents I see in the US (including this one), "declaring an emergency" works fine, so why would they change it? Especially when they have near misses, issues with new aircraft, drones, GA accidents, etc to deal with.
The engines on this plane were built by Rolls Royce. Any issue would probably fall on them. Regardles, its just machinery, things happen, and the aircraft is more than capable of flying with only one engine (or even gliding extremely long distances on no engines period as has happened a handfull of times throughout aviation history).
Well handled by the crew, as always, because they (and every other twin engine crew) know that their plane will get them back on one engine. And every pilot has spent time on the simulator flying with an engine failure.
Damn fine flight crew. Even briefed missed approach on their return.
I was on this flight it was terrifying
I was on this flight and scared shitless. I was up in Business Class so luckily couldn't see any of it but the bangs were terrifying to this white knuckle flyer. I can't fault how flight attendants or pilots handled any of the flight but Delta sure didn't handle it well once we were on the ground. Nobody told us anything beyond "You'll get a new gate'. No information for those of us who would miss connections. Really, really poor communication and customer service on Delta's part once we got to the gate.
It’s very hard to determine all that. you’ve got 20 minutes to get back around and 200 something people to deal with not to include you still need a gate bc it may be occupied. So no it isn’t a poor performance on delta. You’ve got idk how many aircraft in the sky at once
@@cruzelife6510 Yeah, they can't exactly tell you something they don't even know yet. There are other people who make the calls there, not the flight attendants. They're trained to handle emergencies and that's what they did. The rest was someone else's job.
Eu, minha.esposa e uma família de amigos estávamos nesse voo
Excellent all the way! Thanks
I saw this happen last night. A couple loud explosions then I ran outside and saw the left engine on fire. Crazy situation glad everyone was ok. Always fly Delta.
My wife was on that plane. Trerrified.
I've been on one that similarly had an engine go after take off. The 5 or so seconds after the "bang" occurs is the scariest part because it could be anything at that point.
My kitten was on that plane
Delta pilots can probably land in Atlanta blindfolded.
Not if there landing gear can't deploy while in the air
Another reason to FLY DELTA primarily. ATC well-coordinated as well. Flew on this old girl into ATL btw.
Two observations:
1. Nice to see crew use proper call sign “Delta 105 Emergency”; and
2. Note - even with an engine failure, they took 20 minutes to run checklists and maintain stability for landing. Sad the same couldn’t be said for the Jeju Air crew.
We don't know the full situation of the jeju air crew and what they had going on so its better not to pretend they did the right thing or the wrong thing until we have the final report stating the entirety of the facts
Suggesting without any prove (at this point) that its purely pilot error for jeju flight is insanity. Considering all the things you can see from the crash landing they had no lights on and no flaps/gear at least points to critical hydraulic failure, at least one engine gone, shorter runway due to maintenance etc..
The guy above is deflecting blame on boeing onto the pilot.
@@davidpark2509 If you bought a Toyota car in 2009, the engine explodes in 2024 because you never got an oil change, is that Toyota's fault?
Very professional by all. I am sure there was a constant.fuel dump going on for quite.the while. 10 hours.of.fuel is quite.the load.
Is it normal to have that much static? I couldn't even understand what the air traffic controller was saying. Kind of scary, if that's normal.
Ground based receivers.
What we're hearing is not what they're hearing. Hobbyists set up receivers and record what they can get, but there can be trees or hills in the way.
RR Trent 7000 engine failure?
Looks like it, yes. Last time RR had issues on these were with the compressor blades and FAA issued an AD in 2021. This plane is only 4 years old and its engines should have been inspected under the AD but no major overhaul I guess because way too few hours. Maybe they considered the blades were fine and now, well, they were not. Or maybe it was a birdstrike. Delta, Airbus and RR will find out. Let us wait. :)
@@MaVaLa-um2luThere have been issues in the meantime that RR published fixes for before ADs were nessesary. Delta is extremely pro-active when it comes to staying on-top of those things. Regardless, the 7000 is a realitively new engine by aviation standards & like the Leap 1Bs & the P&W GTFs, there are simply unforseen issues that are still being discovered as engines across the world build up their hours beyond what RRs initial testing could have accounted for. Like the older GE & PW engines, the kinks will be ironed out by the engineeres in time.
Well handled, near perfect, I appreciate this.
However, only a minor thing, but: "We're gonna declare an emergency at this time" is just so wild and yet so absolutely common. Use the international wording please. This needs to be addressed to and resolved by FAA and the Airlines, the pilots are just not trained (enough) towards this, no blame on them. Do "Mayday" or "Pan-Pan". And high attention transmissions at best come as a tripple to emphasize them. So in this case 3 times Mayday or 3 times Pan-Pan. It is just this.
I feel like the FAA just has bigger problems on there hands. In most incidents I see in the US (including this one), "declaring an emergency" works fine, so why would they change it? Especially when they have near misses, issues with new aircraft, drones, GA accidents, etc to deal with.
@ankomcoper1183 Fair point.
Been seeing alot of Delta lately. And an Airbus?
Im sure its Boeings fault. 😂😂😂
(Sarcasm Alert)
🤣
Both the companies are cutting corners
The engines on this plane were built by Rolls Royce. Any issue would probably fall on them. Regardles, its just machinery, things happen, and the aircraft is more than capable of flying with only one engine (or even gliding extremely long distances on no engines period as has happened a handfull of times throughout aviation history).