Deservingness Theory
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 11 сен 2024
- Support The Channel
Paypal
paypal.me/thin...
Patreon
www.patreon.com...
Odysee
odysee.com/@Th...
Apologies; there were some unforeseen issues with the audio; should be corrected by next time.
Have you ever wondered why people get upset at ugly people for acting in certain ways or doing certain things or perhaps being certain places that they are not "supposed" to be? Well, there is an entire explanation for this and many other social phenomena that lies in our perception of what people deserve in accordance with their lot in life.
I ran into this when I was still playing music. Every so often I'd write a good song, and there was one in particular that people seemed to like. I had an acquaintance who was a golden boy in the looks department; he had a very attractive girlfriend and was well-liked in our midsized town's punk/alternative scene. Generally we got along pretty well, but one night he got really drunk and told me how angry he was that *I* had written the song in question and not he. It was an odd, awkward exchange; I was being told that I hadn't *deserved* to write a good song, that I was a slug who had gotten uppity. Sooner or later, people will let you know what they really think of you.
Wow.
That's such a strange thing for him to say, I would honestly be bewildered if I was in your shoes at that moment. He must have some serious insecurities going on.
@@Nelo187 It was weird, yeah. It's the closest I've ever heard anyone come to saying, "I deserve everything and you deserve absolutely nothing." In vino veritas.
I feel like most attractive people think this way internally.
@@Krelian4400 Yep. Naturally, most of them would prefer not to admit it, but under certain circumstances it just pops out.
"I deserve all the good things that have happened to me" is one of the most delusional perspectives that is very common.
Confirmation bias.
Indeed, and the corollary is: "People who have bad things happen to them must somehow deserve it."
Really, our instinctual notions of fairness and entitlement are blatantly incorrect. It's fascinating and horrifying that evolution has given us so many cognitive blind spots.
@@k-3402 because genetically and evolutionarily we benefit from it.
If someone is well off/had food etc. in older times, we benefited working with them.
Someone not so well off would be a drain on us. So if you were able to empathize with the worse off one, it isn't beneficial to your genetics to do so.
@John-PaulHunt-pv6ol why haven’t you gotten anything? Did you put effort into improving?
@@Greenyt1234no one would ever get ahead of this was the case. We just stopped caring for each other because we are all dIvErSe
The reason I keep on living is because the world would be a better place without me.
Based
TRUE. Me Too. Tap my hat to that and drink some orange juice with my graham crackers. 💯😂😂
huge cope, the world can never be a better place, it is bad by design
So you're a feminist?
Hell yea brother 🍻
Most people (especially in America) do not deserve their positions. Life is about the dice roll, connections, and how easily one can conform to society (being sheep like)
Nobody flips out like tall girls when they see a short girl dating a tall Chad, or tall dudes when they see a short guy dating a hot girl. I've witnessed countless conversations about this.
Will watch this hours after my 10 minute illegal bathroom break for wageslaving on the grind
While you grind 6'5 Chad who looks like Alain Delon gets his break paid and flirts with the HR Stacies. The commisar--I mean manager has to let it slide or HR will cry S.A and he'll lose his job and "benefits"
"wageslave". Stop calling yourself that. Its Ok to have a 9 to 5 job; would you rather be on the streets?
*Hot woman supposedly dating an ugly guy*
EVERYONE: Either she is an escort or he must be really rich
NO ONE: He must have a great personality
Funny how people are naturally blackpilled but no one is being told about it.
Umm, hot women are allergic to great personalities, unless a dog-like manservanthood is great to you
I agree with this statement.
Blackpill is are reality they just don't know it yet.
People LOVE shortcuts. They hate when someone else finds those shortcuts. They feel cheated. They feel like their own effort was a waste.
Yes, these hypocrites criticizing you have "cheated" on at least one thing before.
This.
@enigmatic8280 but if they are born more intelligent or handsome than you it's not cheating that they acquired immediately when born with good qualities
Exactly!
If you're attractive you can do anything. If you're ugly you're overcompensating.
@John-PaulHunt-pv6olthese guys aren’t even willing to try and improve their social skills though. They feel if they aren’t born a Chad then they are screwed which is such a warped outlook .. there is a strong feeling of learned helplessness amongst men these days and it’s disturbing
@John-PaulHunt-pv6ol your personality is 90% your face
thank you
Whether it’s attractiveness or ugliness, you’re stuck with what you’ve got.
@John-PaulHunt-pv6ol That's actually fine by me. I don't see a price at the end of this game, so I'd rather be happy where I am than struggle for an imaginary price.
I work in an office (pretty low down in the hierarchy). At times i need to speak to dept managers etc over Zoom. I dont have a camera on my pc but they all have laptops with their cameras on. From their job titles/positions in the company alone, i know theyll be in most cases 7+/10 in looks. If older, youll be sble to tell that they were probably a looker in their prime.
So far this has comfortably been the case in the majority of my zoom interactions.
We all know that if you're good looking, people are more interested in what you have to say, value what you say more & you're often pushed into management positions as long as your semi competent in the role.
Doubly true if you're a woman or ethnic minority.
There could also be some correlation between physical attractiveness and overall "good" genetic makeup, which would include intelligence and personality traits conducive to professional success. But this is speculation, one would have to look it up.
I was asked to turn my camera on by an external (female) manager over Teams. I told her, politely, that I don't use my camera, and indeed my company permits this. She asked again, and I told her no again. She then went to my manager, who simply passed on the message. I ignored her, and my camera remains off.
I keep hearing this but i worked in an office for 40 years. Ceo was 5ft no looks there was no noted looks heirarchy. How do you reconcile say Putin or former uk prime minister overweight etc. I think mostly at the end of the day it boils down to luck
@@malicant123good on you 👍
It took me over a year, but I adjusted my diet & hit the gym. I began walking and then jogging and canoeing with my dog. I went from 368 pounds to 250. Given my height, I'm still overweight but not obese. It doesn't make me based or exemplary. I simply didn't want to check out earlier than necessary.
Divorce had led to depression in my life. I shut myself in the house and swelled to a size 52 waist. I simply hit bottom and decided I'd had enough. If someone else chooses to use a pill instead of eating cabbage stew, that's their choice. My way isn't your way and it doesn't have to be.
Here's the thing...we shouldn't be comparing a weight loss pill user to *you*. We should be comparing them to some skinny fucker who was born with a naturally low appetite. What did the skinny dude do to deserve his naturally low appetite, that makes him morally superior to a fat dude who used a pill to reduce his naturally high appetite? Nothing. The pill-using fat dude is just trying to start from the same place the skinny dude automatically started from.
Now, it's totally cool that some fat people (such as yourself, which I give you 100% kudos for) have managed to lose significant amounts of weight despite starting from a disadvantaged place compared to naturally low-appetite people. But it makes no sense for fat people to be obligated to start from a disadvantaged place compared to naturally low-appetite people.
There's something charming and nostalgic about hearing good old gaming mic/phone call voice Stardusk. Solid points as always bro.
I hate the just world fallacy so much
"The Goode IS The True IS The Beautiful."
NON
SEQUITUR
Humans always take short cuts. That's why we use tools. Anyone who argues that needs to return to monke.
The problem I have with drugs like Ozempic or surgeries is they don't change the behavior that lead to the problem. At least the surgeries require some proof of behavioral changes before you can get them, but I don't know if the same procedure can be said about drugs.
Because this drug leads to behavioral change the situation is different.
@@Apjooz That's not really true. It's a biological effect of a hormone produced in the gut that reduces cravings. That's not really what usually classifies as a behavioral change.
@@OnlyTwoShoes well behavior ultimately comes from biology so really what's the difference
Ozempic will destroy their gut biome. Tools are not a shortcut.
@@nicolasgirard2808 Slow down there Nietzsche. You keep taking away agency from people and we're just going to be mindless bio machines.
Im starting to think humans are not generally good. What are your thoughts about it.
He’s made a video on that already
@@xul5042 oh cool
Just complex animals, neither good nor bad.
On average they don't seem to want to reduce suffering. I'm not effective or hard at work on it either.
"Good" is a societal concept that is contradictory to human nature therefore humans will never be good as a whole
It's ovER for DeservingCels
I agree with everything in this video even though it’s been up for 27 seconds
Loyalty!
I love the fact that he watch Gerbert Johnson
Gerby is just the young version of Stardusk.
@@Krelian4400 Gerby is a ch@d larping as an insel.
@@Krelian4400 I hope for Gerberts sake that his life goes in a more positive direction
No@@Krelian4400
@@brianmeen2158same, he’s a good looking dude and wise beyond his years. He should navigate life much easier than others
I dont trust a single new med coming out of the modern pharmaceutical complex
It’s all poison, just like are drinking water and food
Ozempic is a life time subscription to your own health like a serf bonded to a feudal lord.
Except the one that would save your life.
Actually, it works the other way around too. It's called "lifestyle inflation". For example, I have heard attitudes that sound like: "You are a lawyer, why do you drive that old car?". People put you into some group and then expect certain characteristics that you must have, just because you are in that social group. It is especially true when we talk about people who are in "old time high prestige" positions. IT people have somewhat broken out of it, but it still exists in that world too, just to lesser degree.
However people love to make a big deal out of the fact that Warren Buffet doesn't live the lifestyle of a multi-billionare, but that of somebody in the middle class.
I always get a good laugh when stardusk does the brah voice 7:07 😂
Yep and a particularly good one today
*Yeah braahh yeah braahhhh*
Lol
dam right braaah, it made me smile too braaah yaaaah
Same!
You can hear the pain of a lifetime of listening to 'brah' chat. 😂😂
@@festuswilliams654 I’m a millennial but “brah” to me is just South Park. Bruh - seems to be RUclips and more brain rot orientated. At least with South Park the context is actually intelligently done to mock as a satire.
Randy Marsh comes to mind lol.
I like the radio sound to Ape's voice, I like to pretend that I'm Solid Snake on a codec call with him
The program does have a certain NPR air to it, I must say.
Lmao
It's not the appetite you're cutting, it's slowing down your metabolism: "It also slows digestion by increasing the time it takes for food to leave the body". This is where the side effects come in. It already resulted in hundreds of deaths. Fasting is a way less risky way of doing the same thing. It will probably cost you less as well.
In the end, results matter. Others dont like it when they see someone get results from using shortcuts in comparison to their own outcomes that were achieved through hard work and perseverance. It makes them feel cheated. Ultimately, life isn't exactly fair, though, is it?
My take on it is, people have an internal genetic watchdog. When they see a person with the "fat gene" take Ozempic finally lose weight, they become angry that this person is displaying a genetic lie. He will still pass on that crap metabolism to his children. Like when co-workers get sore that diversity hires get fastracked up the corporate ladder simply because they raise the ESG scheme of the company. These people did nothing exceptional with their innate abilities to improve the company (hell, some of them didn't even have the time to do anything), but because of the miracle drug ESG, they are now your manager's manager.
Sure isn't.
There is no problem with the statement:
Life isn't fair.
However, if you use it, don't expect other people to be fair.
Sadism theory. Whatever causes pain to potential competitors or colleagues is appealing. If things are bad for them it makes everyone else seem better in comparison. It isn’t enough that I succeed everyone else must fail.
You hit the nail on the head, that's what the antichrist is like, i.e. the Average Joe now, and especially Jane that whore slut
As a chronically obese person, I’ll take a miracle drug. The opinions of fellow primates are not of utmost importance.
No such thing as a miracle drug.
All the drugs and surgical treatments of obesity eventually result in decreasing the patients caloric intake. A patient can decrease their caloric intake voluntarily without needing to resort to drugs or surgery.
In the future, these drugs will be common place without too many side effects. It's probably the only way to curb obesity rates.
People will be complaining that they are cheating the system that way but who cares.
If the opinions of fellow primates didn’t matter to you, you wouldn’t want the miracle drug.
I never thought of myself as a person that is "an unworthy inkwell" but it turns out that I am - oh well
Hey Stardusk. Hope your alright and flat feet aren't hurting you on your walks
Thanks. Atm flat feet are the least of my problems. Broke my right hand this past weekend in an accident and I am right handed so I am a bit disabled now. Appreciate your support and well wishes.
@@thinking-ape6483 I hate that stardusk. I hope you recover asap. I have flat feet as well and know the struggle.
@@thinking-ape6483 you will unlock those mythical superpowers in no time
@@thinking-ape6483 Thats not good. Were you lifting a fridge or something? I broke an arm as a kid. The hand will restrict you for a while. Never heard of a broken hand before. You have surprisingly normal spirits for an ape who just can't catch a break, pun intended. I won't make you type anymore. Recover fast Gem of the Manosphere.
I thought it was rather sad when people look at couples like Hugh Laurie who has been married to the same woman for many years, and when he was at the height of House popularity, articles were asking why this famous, rich actor was married to an average looking woman.
The women I'd heard talk about the article believed he must have been cheating on her.
🤦
When you try to cheat nature, it usually goes very badly. It happened with "juicing", it happened with Nutrasweet, and it will most likely happen with Ozempic. That anyone could trust the pharmaceutical industry to care about their safety after the last 4 years is incredible. And of course, the expense of treating the consequences of these reckless choices will be passed on to the rest of us, which is very much what I'm upset about.
Yeah. Anyone believing the syringe will just "make them healthy" no matter what they eat, so they can just continue on with their terrible lifestyle is...kind of sad. A tragedy, even.
@palaceofwisdom9448
It's probably not possible to say right now whether the costs of allowing obesity to proliferate unmanaged outweigh the costs of tackling it with ozempic and facing the consequences of potential side effects afterwards.
Obviously big pharma only cares about the profit side of things and frankly as an industry they'd be doing better as a whole if obesity remained an untackled issue which is another reason why I'm a tad sceptical of the drug but we'll just have to wait and see I suppose.
Maybe just maybe ozempic will be like modern day penicillin it will do more good than harm. I have my doubts, but still there is a ghost of a chance
Ozempic works by slowing the digestive process which results in people eating less.
People can simply choose not to eat and they'll achieve the same result. Many religions teach the concept of fasting. People can learn to fast in order to decrease their caloric intake.
@@robcubed9557 It also slowly kills the body, by account of the several recorded deaths
"We delude ourselves into thinking we're anything other than stupid hairless apes stuck on a rock doomed to annihilation long term, hurdling about the cosmos" - This is why I always go to Stardusk for my daily motivation.
"Eff it, gents, let's go bowling."
Yes. We crawled from the slime a billion years ago and evolved into self centered buckets of puke with no purpose other than consumption and reproduction and think we're special. Human puke buckets. hahahahaha
Legacy is everlasting
Nihilism is the biggest coping mechanism
It's crazy how far people have come in terms of learning that a person's merit shouldn't be based on the color of their skin...and yet they are still absolutely blind to that same principle when it comes to things like looks, height, muscle growth, appetite, dick size, etc. Not only are people categorized as having different levels of merit based on these intrinsic physical characteristic, but these characteristics are also treated like some sort of original sin...if you make any attempt to even the playing field, like plastic surgery, drugs, whatever, you are considered lesser than someone who had these exact same advantages naturally. As though some contamination of your soul means you deserve to have a harder life than someone who was simply born with those physical advantages. Ironically, the people who spend their hard earned money on plastic surgery and drugs are the ones who actually earned their desirable physical traits...and yet they are treated as the ones who are not deserving of them. It's insane.
I wear hearing aids and I'm pretty short at 5'7 but I work as a software developer. I've definitely encountered hostility for having a visible disability but still being somewhat successful at least careerwise and financially. People definitely do a double take. Disability and any kind of success makes some people extremely uncomfortable. It's one reason I want to geomax to southeast Asia as they don't really care how short, disabled, or ugly you are as long as you have money.
So you're saying you're 'disabled' because you wear hearing aids?
Very possible that you may be more hung up on it than anyone else, and that your insecurities about it are letting you blame the hearing aids for every/any personal slight you encounter. Hearing aids are nothing. Similar to someone who wears glasses.
Maybe you have bad breath, or a crappy sense of humor
@@jamesharper8373 I am saying other people perceive me as disabled because of the hearing aids. And then when they see that I am in shape, make good money, or am with an attractive girl, it can make them uncomfortable, since disability is associated with the opposite of these things.
It's ur personality brah
Deservingness is a remnant of wishful restribution from the days of religion. Now we don't have Gods to appeal to when we are salty and jealous, so we employ this vague sense of cosmic justice.
unironically man closer to god lives and dies happy life. forget bluepill delusion, religionmaxxing is best delusion.
The days of religion never passed away.
Uh, or religion is also a manifestation of this instinct...
Thank you for covering this very underrated, but one of the most essential topics. Hardly any people address it.
JC got mad being called: "Good Sir"
Nobody is good, not even YOU! once you get that, enlightenment begins!
Figured that out a long time ago.
@@DrmCom2003
good for you! we all belong to the Stupid Assholes club...
We can only get better! requires trying! Trying counts!
Based biblecel
Its the same as calling someone " You are too nice/kind/good hearted for this world " .
No . There is always a point when even the nicest and greatest human being can turn into the worst monster or doing sonething because someone crossed his line out of nowhere .
we are nothing more or less than the cumulative biological and environmental luck, over which we had no control 🙂
Its a mix of both. Enviroment/biology determine your ceiling. Your actions and efforts determine how close to your personal ceiling you get.
But thats why stuff has to be looked at on an individual by individual basis. A man who's ceiling is low would have his efforts wasted if he was chasing something his ceiling wasn't capable of.
On the other extreme is people given high ceilings by birth they just need to not fuck up.
Where the "hard work, and effort" people come in is those whose ceiling is on the line. Where if they give no effort they are on one side of the line, and if they give some or alot of effort, they end up on the other side.
Each person has to find that ceiling for themselves, then act accordingly.
@@Greenyt1234 your actions and efforts are determined by your biology and environment which you have no control over
"know your place"
That's caste system.
Also, the deservingness is called "fair world fallacy"
I think people internalize these hierarchical rungs and apply them to themselves subconsciously, keeping themselves down.
Recently been reading ancient roman sources like livy and dionysus of halicarnasus
The rich romans like appius claudius said "the poor are lazy" to avoid welfare back then, in about five hundred BC xD
“Deservingness” verbiage is a vehicle for prejudice.
Good Evening. from Cambodia
Bucky Lastard
Hows Cambodia?
@@Schizohandlers
Hello Dude.
I am living here since December 23. For me its easy going.
Friendly People safe and afordable.
Never back to Europe.
Have a good one.
Are you speaking through a Stormtrooper helmet?
Iknow my place and it's beneath.
Ozempic is part of GPL-1 antagonist drugs which were put on the market way back in 2005. So if there are long term side effects we should be seeing it by now.
I love that "joyous note" at the end. It always reminds me it can always get worse. Thank you for your hard work, Sir. I mean it.
This is similar to the old Christian saying: "Those who do not work don't deserve to eat."
I think it's ""Those who do not want to work (...)".
It is, that is the rational perspective, except this guy isn't rational, he's a big pussy using it to justify sh*tty behavior. Like, he's basically the devil.
would this also apply to billionaires who preach hard work for their success but actually got help from luck, connections, and financial support from family / friends?
I think I deserve therefore I am entitled.
Something I've noticed is that when older people say hard work they just mean doing things the hard way like they had to when they were younger rather than anything more efficient or faster or safer that is available today the day of the pillow can't come fast enough
You could say the same thing for dudes who escortmax and don’t decide to perform in the dating circus. When u tell people that you’re a guy who takes part in those type of things people get upset people get angry and they start to criticize you especially when they find out it’s with an attractive woman. They’ll say things like “why don’t you date women” “why do you pay I get it for free”(which is bs whenever they say that, and whole bunch of other things.
Appetite comes down to carbs and hormones. The calories in/calories out model does not explain obesity. Ozempic is a very expensive way to do what can be done cheaply with dieting, reducing carbs. Fructose directly suppresses leptin which tells us we are full and corn syrup is the easiest source of this. Food companies learned this in the 1970s, and that is when the obesity crisis began. By working out the best food regime you own your own health. By relying on Ozempic you are subscribing to your health for life, like a life term serf of big pharma and still having side effects, possibly life shorting side effects, all the same.
This is all quite simple. Life is an anti entropic energy system and humans are a life form. When a fat person loses weight using pills without expending as much energy as someone who didn't do that, they get upset because as an energy system their goal is to conserve as much energy as possible while expending as little as possible and so the news that another life form did what they did while expending less energy they feel cheated and get angry because their own sense of power has been reduced in comparison and so they will seek to diminish the other person in order to rebalance the power differential. It's ultimately futile but it makes them feel better
Did you EQ the low frequencies out of your voice?
sounds like a different mic
For some reason he seems to go back to his old mic every now and then. Or maybe its a software issue.
He said he broke his right hand, so maybe he's just using a smartphone mic. It definitely sounds lower quality though, no bass. I'd imagine an iPhone mic would be much better
Well, sometimes people really are underesrivng. Like recently an indian students scammed the whole Indian and American system and got admission in a prestigious uni in USA.
So, because of this scammer guy a well deserving student must have missed the chance to reach his full potential
My boomer mom always rants about the necessity of hardwork, slaving away, work, work, work! But what does she use to lose weight despite the fact she doesn’t have diabetes? Yep you guessed it! Ozempic! People hate short cuts unless they are the only ones that get to use them!
Can you imagine the uproar when we get to the point that you can download a skill like in the Matrix?
I know Kung fu
Stardusk, You re the first person I ve heard say "too, as well'- Its comforting, thanks. * I've been several times corrected that this is a tautology/ncorrect grammar but it, for me expresses a nuance ( I did it subconsciously until it was brought to my attention) as I believe I am attempting to make an effort to share and include while attemping to communicate an idea while trying to stay open and even subtly deferential..It's the first time I've ever heard it spoken by another, Thanks
he worked as a teacher in Germany so you can certainly trust his grammar. I appreciate his eloquence as well
That almost 40 I am realizing my place in the world I'm already dead I have no one and I'm not very high on the scale I feel terrible for those who are even lower than me my life is a nightmare and all I do is pay bills thousands of dollars a month
Your metabolism is heavily impacted by activity level and sheer volume of high mitochondria dense cells. If the person is muscular, then it's probably not calorie count keeping them thin. I was maintaining BMI 25 at 4000 calories a day.
I won't be angry at people who take pills to get thin. I hope it works well and is widely distributed to the wider public. The obesity epidemic goes so much further than any single individual. It causes so many other problems. All of society benefits when all of society is less obese.
I'm pretty convinced some people, healthy people, can eat a whole lot of extra without storing it.
Who is angry? Let them destroy their gut biome not my gut idgaf
@@Apjooz I've definitely come across some genetic freaks that appear to be able to eat and drink whatever they want and still look great.
I know others who watch everything they eat and still look terrible.
@@ApjoozI can eat "extra" and not store it. The reason I can do that is because, I don't.
Throat singing Brrrrrruuuuuuhhh
Good morning!
Good Morning brother
Wool socks to bed = wake up to receiving head
I am a weird case in this debate. My mother is on the shot and is loosing weight. She is over 70 years old and survived cancer twice, and always had an eating problem she passed down to my sister and I.
My sister is now getting the shot and loosing weight.
But I have recently cutting back on my food and going for walks. I have lost about 30lb. But still have a lot to go. We all do.
Am i doing it the "Right way" while they take a shortcut?
I don't care. My father passed away a few years ago and he was overweight by a lot. He weighed over 400lbs. And I don't want anyone else in my family to suffer that.
That being said even lite exercise has huge health benefits outside of weight control. Bone density, lung and heart health just to name a few.
I want them to exercise because loosing fat is only one part of being healthy.
Ozempic will destroy your gut biome do not take it
Keep it going!
You can expand it even for the "right" of living, you cant in most countries just ask for unliving, but if you say your life sucks some will say "Oh now you know that habits leeds to consequences" or "Chill buddy everything will be alright", isnt my choice, is my father's/mother's choice, is the society choice, so one decides to unlive into a florest, losing all the organs in the process doing to rotting, in the end society/humans are just a reflection of your flawed bio-hardware.
Hipocrisy, and inefficiency, is whats defines a human.
"Love all, trust a few, do wrong to none."-Ballistic, from Apex Legends
Because taking a pill to help curve your appetite isn’t helping the underlying issue of food addiction and exercise
I've always been skinny. I literally struggle with gaining weight and it's an appetite problem. I normally live off of one or two meals a day and my mom criticizes me about it. Though I know I'm very lucky to be tall and skinny rather than short and fat. Given my face, the latter one would be even worse.
I'm short and skinny.
I’m average or short (I have hyperlordosis so idk my true height) but it’s hard for me to gain weight.
@@brianbarrett8739do you have hyperlordosis and forward neck? You could be 2 maybe even 3 inches taller if you fix it depending on how bad it is.
The real problem with Ozempic, from a Pharmaceutical student's perspective, is that there is no such thing as a free lunch (no pun intended.)
The function of the drug is inherently dangerous when used at doses commonly prescribed for general obesity, it really is supposed to be for diabetic patients instead of obese people who refuse to put in the extra effort required to lose the excess fat. Sadly, it is our diabetic patients who will suffer the most from this off-label prescription use of the drug, because with America's enormous (no pun intended) obesity epidemic, the manufacturers responsible for production of the drug will not be able to meet the market demand for it, meaning that our diabetic patients who really could benefit from the medicine in ways more clinically significant than the generally obese patient, will face the brunt of the shortage brought upon us from this plague of "magic drugs for all your problems."
That isn't the problen of the drug then, but the people, as usual.
@John-PaulHunt-pv6ol Precisely, that's a very astute comparison, there are in fact quite a few trends that correlate along the axes of Computer Sciences and Biomedical technologies/Drug R&D. Another one that comes to mind are newer more experimental messenger RNA vaccines and therapies. Information Theory seems to be taking over STEM as a whole.
@@Greenyt1234 Well it's a bit of both. The problem I speak of in this comment would not be present of Doctors/NP's would simply exercise some more clinical discretion before deploying such drastic and novel drug therapies. It would also help if more pharmacists argued against the overprescription, but they're shut down from doing so as this would hurt the profits of the big chains (CVS, Walgreens, etc,..) and "big pharma" (Pharmaceutical industry, Drug research & marketing, etc,..)
Yes it was really helping my wifes diabetes before all the lazy lardarses started using it like candy: They will be double the weight when they come off it.
Love the optimistic conclusion.
If women don't like short men then how is the average height for a man worldwide only 5'7. Women are breeding with short men which means they like short men.
Women don't "like" men full stop
Cause people forget what “short” actually is. Women aren’t breeding with 5’4 and under men.
@@bwc-chvd in Mexico they are
I don’t know that people are necessarily angry that people took a drug to get big muscles or lose weight, although jealousy and the threat of more competition entering the market does play a part. I think mostly people just don’t respect people as much that take short cuts versus people that put in the work and effort. People respect competency. Who are people going to look up to and respect more l, the guy that started with nothing, learned a skill, put in 80 hour work weeks for a several years and became a self made millionaire or the guy that just picked 6 random numbers successfully and becomes a millionaire overnight?
I would say that Social class by birth being more British and Caste being more Indian and Wealth class being more American.
Banger vid. One of your best in a long time.
I wonder how strong the negative correlation between being a schlub and being married to a hot chick is?
It's definitely not minus one, so there are exceptions, some of which are due to randomness not some other cause e.g. wealth
I’m not upset at the people who choose to use ozempic for weight loss. I worry for them, and I resent them for encouraging the economy around inadequately tested pharmaceuticals whose revival was the recent pharmageddon.
Pharmageddon
So you say tomayto.
7:16 Even at highschool this was a problem for me, the teachers there put me on the lower level English and Maths exams so I could not attain a higher grade how ever well I performed. But I fought my way up the system to get a Honours degree in the sciences and ended up in a job which outstripped those salaries that teachers were on by 8 times. Also in my job the maths and English language communication skills that are required are on a higher level than that of those teachers. I think teachers get a kick out of keeping some kids down and I realised this even back then.
No, youre just an outlier whose narcissist delusion (psych. protection against mistreatment) ended up helping in the long run. I can confidently tell you that there is no way to get bad grades if youre smart, unless youre strongly antisocial aswell.
@@ardaricus1566 When I was 18 and seeing a psychologist I took the WAIS-4, which I scored a FSIQ of 152 on. I performed pretty mediocre in Middle School and graduated with a 2.7 GPA in High School. Sure, I didn't ever try and I'd typically just not turn work in, but I promise you that you can still receive bad grades even while having a supposed "genius-level" intelligence. I also wouldn't even say that I'm strongly antisocial, I probably displayed only a slight to moderate level of antisociality insofar as I just didn't feel like trying in school.
@@dwellinginshadows "Antisocial" was perhaps the wrong term. Still, there were major studies conducted on people like you, with the result that unsuccessful geniuses (in educational attainment) almost always had deficits in executive function.
@@ardaricus1566I almost certainly have issues with executive functioning, likely stemming from long bouts of depression and social anxiety during adolescence. Regarding my educational attainment, I've shifted my attitude since then to be more goal-oriented and less lazy (I'm 21 now). After high school, I enrolled in an accredited online program where I completed my bachelor's in two years, and I was recently admitted to a T20 Law School. At this point, I don't at all regret sleeping through 11th and 12th grade. Regardless, I will concede that, given sufficient motivation, mental health, etc., an intelligent person shouldn't receive low grades or test scores.
Lol that last 30 seconds was classic Stardusk. Freaking nailed it with this video. The only thing more offensive than an unacceptable correlation to a human is another human bucking said correlation. We're really pretty evil when it comes down to it.
11:03 amazing summary of all mankind 😂😂😂
loved the conclusion of this video
Anyways, on that joyous note...LOL.
That is cause humans are good at cheating the system.
Masai people deceiving lions is my favorite instance of that. (Human planet, stealing meat from lions)
There's a lot of odd smoke and mirror tricks that make things work, like a high speed camera that tracks a bullet or hypee sonic projectile mid flight is a highspeed camera looking at a literal mirror because mirrors are light, easy to aim and move precisely than a bulky camera.
And our biggest go-to insult is almost always immutable characteristics. Close second is virtue or personal history insults.
Ozempic and Juice are also very expensive.
That is part of the reason it upsets people.
(I know this was mentioned in the video)
Juice is not expensive. Test cypionate for 12 weeks is cheaper than one 2kg pot of protein powder
I have never seen a man actively work against these scenarios. They will talk about it, they will discuss them but only women will go out of their way to mess with other people's lives over it.
I'll never take Ozempic. I don't deserve it and even if I did I would reject it outright as republicans would get angry with me for refusing to take drugs, they back now on fox news calling me stupid or a demon now. My response is so what? It's my body my choice my life my choice to live it the way I want not yours.
It's not so much calories in calories out. It's far more important what kind of calories are going in.
Cal in/cal out is simplified, but fundamentally isn't wrong, its just the nuance that needs corrected based on the system.
All bodies will burn calories at different rates and absorb depending on the processes going on.
Better nutritional food helps satiate the mechanical functions and triggers responses to feel full or stop eating.
"Empty calories" have a harder time triggering it so people crave more and take in more.
Cal in/cal out isn't wrong, just overly simplified
@@Greenyt1234there is no such thing as empty calories. Proteins, carbohydrates, and lipids are the three sources of calories. Carbohydrates are the most dangerous since the body has to do the least amount of chemistry magic to convert them into useful energy. The problem with carbs is that they dump into the bloodstream quickly, faster than we can use the, spikes blood sugar, forces the pancreas to dump insulin to bring our blood sugar down, and the excess is immediately stored as fat. Then you are hungry again, so you consume more calories. Proteins and lipids take longer to convert, are slowly and steadily released in to the bloodstream in useful form and that creates the sensation of satiety. Meaning you won't tend to consume more calories since you blood sugar will stay at "normal" levels for a longer period of time.
@brianbarrett8739 empty calories refers to calories you eat without extra nutritional value added. Yes you get calories from the carbs, but you also miss out on a crap ton of other nutritional value that other food sources provide.Use your brain a bit before spouting off. If it didn't matter where your calories came from you would be just as healthy only eating krispy kreme donuts. Chuckleheads like you seem to miss that fact everytime you try to argue this crap.
I think we should all take every advantage possible in life.
I eat low dose addur awl & creatine.
Big improvement. Makes the suck, suck less and my efforts more affordable.
I am making a videogame and would appreciate a chat with you on lore related to your joyous insights.
I am aware you owe me no such chats, but would appreciate it.
Im not angry that bonds cheated for hr record.
But , I don't respect his record. Honor it. Nor think it's fair to the clean guys.
Also, my wife lost 50lbs on wegovy, it doesnt make me angry that she cheated to do it.
But, i dont respect the cheat, i respect the hard work.
As a Gen Z, I love your impression around the middle of your video : )
What does he make his thumbnails with?
7:08 amazing impressions
Good practical commentary on the incoherence of deservingness theory. The arguments thinking ape put forward resemble Robert Sapolsky's "turtles all the way down" framework that disentangles the wide spectrum of human achievement from merit altogether; whether an ugly guy is lucky enough to be in the proximity of an attractive female for a long period of time or a good looking guy is born with the requisite facial features to date women at the top of their respective intrasexual hierarchy, neither "deserved" to obtain a better commodity than the majority of people. To this end, I'm not sure why thinking ape doesn't firmly identify with the political left even if he eschews the practical considerations of voting or doesn't jibe with the temperament of most modern day leftists. It is worth noting that Robert is a self proclaimed leftist who has provided thinking ape with a rich tapestry of ideas to draw upon.
What’s up with your audio??
Doesn’t everyone “get in where they fit in?” There’s something to be said of selection and self-selection.
I would be worried about the side effects of any drug that promotes better health. While i'm not a fan of shortcuts, sometimes hard work alone isn't enough.
What's with the sound quality?
SW, International man of mystery 😊
I can't wait for the Thinking-Ape content when he realizes E.T.'s are real.
Yeah I be hating on ozempic bums, there are no short cuts and they'll regain the weight back.