Can you make a video on this detailed ... Like start with a web application using APIs and if there is a requirement for a mobile app, then we can easily go since we have developed APIs For this we need to decide on which point we need to go for app development and what type of architecture we need to use, that makes it easy to move to mobile app development I want to understand that..
You ducking say that but it’s because your ok downloading a 50mb once and waiting like 10 minutes for it to install but if the website take more then 3 seconds to load with the same functionality as that app you like nah it’s too long. Websites are constrained by this, if you would wait the same amount of time and then install a website as a pwa then you’d get the same functionality but unfortunately websites are thought of as different from an app even though they are the same
I mean, the information in the blog itself isn't false. The average person most likely uses less than half of all apps on their phone, on a daily basis.
@@AcidiFy574 , the entire point of a mobile app is that you can pull out your small and easily portable phone to use it at any time. This video completely ignores while MOBILE apps were invented.
@@Shark-hn4mvThis proves that you don't know what web technologies can do because what you just described CAN be done using web technologies. You can install the app from the app store and open it from and icon
@@anasabubakar4125 thanks for taking the time to reply. I started kotlin 3 days ago and I've been enjoying it so far, I will look into Java and c# in the future
Websites are not convenient for users logically following its better to have a mobile app for companies to promote their businesses. Its better start with startup for small entrepreneurs but then its must have to have an app if they want to grow bigger and attract a huge audience
@@sqfzerzefsdf well a majority of people still use 2 to 3 year old devices which lag greatly when you apply too much css on it. If you add less styling the app would just look dull and kinda like "atleast it works". On the other hand Mobile apps are much more optimised for those hardware and you don't have to worry about responsive design. You'll be missing a lot more customers if you don't make a mobile app that's optimised enough to run on most devices.
@@Vivi-xn9iz They have to do it because they want to be in touch with users. And they can't afford to create native apps or possibly don't have knowledge about native apps development.
@@gulabpatel7477 I know but people are thinking that web apps are only websites i'm sure they have knowledge about native apps development but it's much easier to make 1 web app to distribute to everyone rather than deal with compatibility issues
As a user I‘m sometimes annoyed by this approach - the amazon app is really just the website and it feels that way. Native iOS Apps have a different way of navigating than a website and when I open an App, I want to have this workflow. But of course starting with a website is a great way to start and then you can add specific custom items and workflows for the different operating systems with React native e.g.
Websites are not convenient for users logically following its better to have a mobile app for companies to promote their businesses. Its better start with startup for small entrepreneurs but then its must have to have an app if they want to grow bigger and attract a huge audience
True, javascript is the worst language in the world. So random, chaotic, only those programming beginner like Javascript because it is easy to learn. For a professional software engineer, nobody can reject kotlin, such an elegant language.
As web developer and mobile developer, I think you are wrong because mobile app can do everything that web app can do but web app can't do everything like mobile app. So, we still should build a mobile app anyway.
Bro even developers dislike web apps, just because javascript is a shitty language, where its code structure is not well organized. Almost no design pattern textbooks are explained in javascript, this already means everything. Java and Kotlin is super productive compared with JS.
It's not about developer flexibility but the comfort of the user. With more smooth UI, users tend to like mobile apps for intense use. Such as chat or video streaming etc.
One thing web can't do yet, at least as far as I'm aware, is Bluetooth stuff. If you've got some specialty equipment there's no going around an app. Plus I can do a webapp and a normal app with flutter so I get the best of both worlds.
I can't track user's live geolocation with a web application unless it's instance is running in focus and the phone is unlocked. So nope, you should build native apps, as long as you must do so.
Don't undervalue notifications! They can be good for reminders, music control, alarms, status updates and really improve the retention rate of your app.
No need to explain. Notification is a very important thing itself. Without it we may lose almost 50% of the smartness of mobile phones. So many heavy use cases are required to have notification. Strong notification delivery is also compulsory as the web doesn't provide this
Nah, it is really inconvenient to use web apps on mobile. They're great on PC but on mobile it's just inconvenient, an app is much better to use so makes sense to build one
I am using react native for building video calling app. Gotta say that react native is not the best to do it. It doesn't give performance like other languages. And also Webrtc library is missing lots of features which is included in react JS. Only advantage is that we can develop on both platform
@@proNOOBIE_ That's an SDK. I don't know about Agora that much. Even though they will be using some kind of Webrtc. For mobile it will probably react native webtc. The normal web / desk SDK with Webrtc adapter doesn't play nicely with mobile platforms. And the mobile version might be missing a lot of things . For example stun switching since we don't get rtcrtpsender on mobile version
@@proNOOBIE_ Also I am not using third party SDK for this since it will limit the flexibility and features. Plus my company wants to make an SDK of their own
Ur forgetting how terrible web apps feel to use though, there’s an additional layer between user interaction and the actual interface that makes it feel like shit to use
That's only an advantage if you have experience in webdev. If you are proficient with Java it'll be easier to write native android apps then go through some weird library to get a website (I'm neither so sorry if there's a very obvious solution)
Native mobile apps are optimised for better user experience on mobile. Web pages trying to work on a mobile app are mostly crap and annoy the hell out of me as a user. So nah.
There are many things around this. It's just I don't do mobile applications. 1. Mobile compatibility 2. Notifications 3. User friendliness 4. Type of applications 5. Application Wright Many more...
Hey my dear app developers, come together and show this man why we and our work exists and why is it important and relevant even after so much advancement in web technologies And one more thing, a web app/website can never replace a proper native mobile/desktop application.
It's not about just, creating APPs. We need professionals to maintain, to fix, to improve it. Like Daft punks say; Work it Make it Do it Makes us ( it ) Harder Better Faster Stronger
I would recommend you to look into Flutter/Dart if you are not sure what to focus on. Flutter is getting better every year and the application runs on iOS, Android and the web. I stumbled across the same question and started learning Swift for iOS which I quit fast because I knew I wanted to include Android as well. That was before Apple introduced Swift UI which is great. All I am saying is: Web and mobile development are both options for building an application. Flutter combines the two worlds and what might have seemed as some more Framework Google will kill soon, it has become super popular. Major companies like Toyota are now using Flutter for embedded systems (That’s what I have read) because it can do so much. Start with Flutter if you want to make an application that runs everywhere.
You make a valid point that technically, anything achievable in an app can also be built on a website. However, it's important to consider factors like customer acquisition and monetization. App stores offer a massive global marketplace and streamlined monetization options, making it easier for developers to reach and profit from users. While it's possible to achieve similar results on the web, the convenience factor of app stores should not be underestimated when deciding between the two ways of publishing.
Your title isn't entirely correct. For a business it's true they need to evaluate whether a native mobile app would serve them. But what about the developers?
People, try FLUTTER and you will love it. Engineers: please make more FLUTTER PACKAGES so that it would become the killer multi platform framework of our age. Flutter stands for F uck yeah it’s the future!
Such a great point, the only other thing I can think of as to why apps are good are the ease of engagement. Websites seems to be more strained of interacting with them sometimes because they’re urls should be more readily available. I think people love icons also.
Long term this is a shot in the foot, tbh. PWAs consistently ranks lower when packed and distributed in the mobile stores, users feel the clunky approach. The company I work for went from something like 3 stars in Play Store to 4.8 by just migrating their main screens to Flutter. It's like night and day. And the complaining we receive nowadays are mostly about the parts of the app that are still rendering the pwa through a WebView. The change was so big they're planning to kill all PWAs code and their Swift codebase and unify everything into Flutter.
don't worry man this doni is saying true things but andriod development will never die, it will if android dies but nevertheless if you master react native you can easily master another language or api cause you will learn core programming language from what you're doing rn, keep learning it will be of worth!
You SHOULD build a mobile app (and that is the only correct video to make). A dev's job is to meet the needs of phone users and a half-assed website that is referred to as a "web app" to mislead people into using it, is not what we need. We need developers to actually do their job.
@@Shalinity I use both all the time they are the same if anything its super easy to transfer your skills. TBH native apps are still really useful the mobile browser isn't ready for rendering heavy graphics just yet. This is why native apps are way better.
What he's saying is that it's ok to learn how to do it, but if you wanna be serious about it and actually create something, it should already be proven fit for the market. Otherwise, most of the stuff is now on the web.
I have to agree with this one WebApps are more lightweight than mobile application. WebApps are faster and more efficient. So you're right 👍 but creating a mobile application is also good to learn.
@@codegambit2507 haha WebApps are faster maybe internet troubles is the problem, but web Apps are faster because on a mobile app the more the updates extra dependencies are being added to the app so this means less storage on the user's phone but websites and WebApps access files and other metadata with ease
Oh right, cuz we all want our apps to load forever under the weight of numerous poorly optimized JavaScript frameworks. Boo-hoo, poor software engineers don’t wanna learn to build good software, so everyone should suffer. This is what software development has become. First we saw language abstractization. Who needs these pointers and memory management, ew, too hard. Better wrap every element and even every operator into a chain of classes! Now that’s fast - to develop, but not to run. And voilà, now everyone builds slow sh*tware prone to memory leaks. Now we see this f*cking tendency to build everything on the web. And who knows what next.
Totally agreed because nowadays everybody are in rush many people do not have the time to download and still wait to install apps but rather just go to the browser and do stuffs. Aside from that, WEB IS THE FUTURE.
Web apps are better for user acquisition, and mobile apps are better for engagement and retention. If you’re building a new app, you should 100% start with the web, and move your users to the app later.
You are absolutely wrong. I've 10 years mobile app development experience, android java, iOS Swift, and Flutter. Some of benefits of using mobile technologies instead of web technologies like javascript: 1. performance: javascript wrapped apps or web apps performe poorly on mobile phones 2. libraries: flutter, react native, java or swift have tons of libraries optimized for mobile apps. On the other hand, if you use javascript, you need to code everything from scratch. note: If you need a website and same website as an app, it's okay to use React to develop.
Video will come for why you SHOULD build an app :) so don’t think I hate you
Can you make a video on this detailed ...
Like start with a web application using APIs and if there is a requirement for a mobile app, then we can easily go since we have developed APIs
For this we need to decide on which point we need to go for app development and what type of architecture we need to use, that makes it easy to move to mobile app development
I want to understand that..
Like iOS push notifications 😀
@@shanmukhapatil7131 you don't need capable enough to ask a question correctly. I suggest working on that first and then programming. Good luck !
@@sebastianzdroana7834 okay bro
@@sebastianzdroana7834 updated brother, hope you can now understand what i am trying to say
actually web apps are slower and janky sometimes. For products I usually use, I prefer downloading the app.
True websites are slower on my phone and its boring
Nice answer
Only true for nartive apps and not for apps that just hosts the web code
You ducking say that but it’s because your ok downloading a 50mb once and waiting like 10 minutes for it to install but if the website take more then 3 seconds to load with the same functionality as that app you like nah it’s too long. Websites are constrained by this, if you would wait the same amount of time and then install a website as a pwa then you’d get the same functionality but unfortunately websites are thought of as different from an app even though they are the same
@@sc76399 Well websites are inherently made for quick access whereas apps are made for reliable and regular access
"research" - shows some nameless blog post.
Just for spec topic so its really not for everyone 🤷🏻.
He probably automatically create these videos with stock photos with sone kind of py bot, so there will be things that don’t make sense
@@AleOnRUclips no?
I mean, the information in the blog itself isn't false. The average person most likely uses less than half of all apps on their phone, on a daily basis.
@@NigerianWeeb most likely doesn't count as a statistic.
Source - Trust me bro!
Hes on about nothing lol how is he going to store data locally without an app, not everyone wants to use the internet connection for everything
@@nesletchimaew9209LocalStorage
@@nesletchimaew9209web is best
@@nesletchimaew9209you can probably do web apps that store things locally. like syncthing
@@nesletchimaew9209 no way you don’t know how to store data locally, cookies exist for a reason
Please stop this kind of clickbait.
Exactly
You won’t make money on an app but sure go ahead and try maybe your the next bill gates ig 😂
On the next episode “This is why you shouldnt breathe”
Threatening
scary
😂😂
Research
only 25% of the population breathes
Tell me you're a web dev without telling me you're a web dev
All phone apps are glorified web apps
@@AcidiFy574ok I believe you my child.
@@AcidiFy574 , the entire point of a mobile app is that you can pull out your small and easily portable phone to use it at any time. This video completely ignores while MOBILE apps were invented.
@@Shark-hn4mvThis proves that you don't know what web technologies can do because what you just described CAN be done using web technologies. You can install the app from the app store and open it from and icon
@@Shark-hn4mvPWAs have entered the chat
I am a self employed mobile app developer. This advice is hilarious.
Which tech stack would you suggest learning please?
@@EUU100 it depends on the language you know. i use java/Kotlin for native android and C# for ios and windows
but i prefer C# since you can use Unity to develop awesome mobile games and 3D apps
@@anasabubakar4125 thanks for taking the time to reply. I started kotlin 3 days ago and I've been enjoying it so far, I will look into Java and c# in the future
@@EUU100 swift and Kotlin
Imagine someone really believes in this, lol. Mobiledev won't die soon.
Websites are not convenient for users logically following its better to have a mobile app for companies to promote their businesses. Its better start with startup for small entrepreneurs but then its must have to have an app if they want to grow bigger and attract a huge audience
@@Drannn54 true!
@@Drannn54 isn't that what he said tho? Like building a todo app is redundant. But something for ur company is kinda expected..
@Westerner please explain why you think that because I hardly ever download any app I can access on the web
@@sqfzerzefsdf well a majority of people still use 2 to 3 year old devices which lag greatly when you apply too much css on it.
If you add less styling the app would just look dull and kinda like "atleast it works".
On the other hand Mobile apps are much more optimised for those hardware and you don't have to worry about responsive design.
You'll be missing a lot more customers if you don't make a mobile app that's optimised enough to run on most devices.
Noted but still gonna make one.
That's a open threat
Lol
Did u make one
lol that was mean 😂
People basically like to open a software rather than search everytime
No need to search or open a browser. PWA
@@mgr1282 pwa is shit
a lot of apps/softwares nowadays are just web browser displaying a website.
@@Vivi-xn9iz They have to do it because they want to be in touch with users. And they can't afford to create native apps or possibly don't have knowledge about native apps development.
@@gulabpatel7477 I know but people are thinking that web apps are only websites
i'm sure they have knowledge about native apps development but it's much easier to make 1 web app to distribute to everyone rather than deal with compatibility issues
As a user I‘m sometimes annoyed by this approach - the amazon app is really just the website and it feels that way. Native iOS Apps have a different way of navigating than a website and when I open an App, I want to have this workflow. But of course starting with a website is a great way to start and then you can add specific custom items and workflows for the different operating systems with React native e.g.
As an android Amazon user. I like the app better than going to the web browser and doing it. But idk might just be me
Well… why tf would they make the app different from the website 😂😂
@@-keiskx1774 why would they then create an app if you could just go on the web?
@@simonkraemer3725 the app feels fine for me on iOS, what are you talking about?
You can achieve a near native feel with PWA’s if you’re skilled enough.
As a mobile and web dev i completely disagree with this
Native Performance left the chat..
What you are suggesting is right, but only from a developer's perspective, from a client's perspective, achieving the best user experience is a must.
Beautiful/stable interfaces also? I find webapps look and act crappy on my phone. It may be just the case for the apps I came across.
Well it depends on whether or not the website considered actually supporting mobile web usage
Websites are not convenient for users logically following its better to have a mobile app for companies to promote their businesses. Its better start with startup for small entrepreneurs but then its must have to have an app if they want to grow bigger and attract a huge audience
Probably because they aren't tested properly.
As android developer, i am offended 😂
How mobile apps were UI design?
Like webs are designed by css, so how java do that?
same bro 🤣
@@ganeshmk2652 java/kotlin using xml,
@@ganeshmk2652 java isn't popular in android development anymore its kotlin
@@JoeMemes Still used and the two can be jointed.. also it’s better for starters.
I would develop a mobile app just to avoid Javascript
True, javascript is the worst language in the world. So random, chaotic, only those programming beginner like Javascript because it is easy to learn. For a professional software engineer, nobody can reject kotlin, such an elegant language.
As web developer and mobile developer, I think you are wrong because mobile app can do everything that web app can do but web app can't do everything like mobile app.
So, we still should build a mobile app anyway.
Developers prefer web apps, non-developers prefer mobile apps. Unless your target are developers, mobile apps are the way to go.
Bro even developers dislike web apps, just because javascript is a shitty language, where its code structure is not well organized. Almost no design pattern textbooks are explained in javascript, this already means everything. Java and Kotlin is super productive compared with JS.
Don't listen to this, building a mobile app can change your whole career.
You can't access file system freely in the web
Stop demotivating and fear mongering.
Yes some apps can be developed as both web and mobile apps however the mobile version will deliver better quality and much better user experience
It's not about developer flexibility but the comfort of the user.
With more smooth UI, users tend to like mobile apps for intense use. Such as chat or video streaming etc.
One thing web can't do yet, at least as far as I'm aware, is Bluetooth stuff. If you've got some specialty equipment there's no going around an app.
Plus I can do a webapp and a normal app with flutter so I get the best of both worlds.
Yep!
“Don’t make a mobile app, trust”
I can't track user's live geolocation with a web application unless it's instance is running in focus and the phone is unlocked. So nope, you should build native apps, as long as you must do so.
Bro 😂😂 literally reality is opposite , people use all sorts of apps to handle the pdfs , edit images , listen songs , make payments , etc
Don't undervalue notifications! They can be good for reminders, music control, alarms, status updates and really improve the retention rate of your app.
No need to explain.
Notification is a very important thing itself. Without it we may lose almost 50% of the smartness of mobile phones. So many heavy use cases are required to have notification. Strong notification delivery is also compulsory as the web doesn't provide this
"This why you shouldn't breath through your nose, bringing through your nose sounds like fun, but you could literally breathe through your mouth."
😂 nice one bro
Your completely forgetting brand loyalty and ease of use
you forget to mention that business apps are important and the majority of the app store shareholding
Nah, it is really inconvenient to use web apps on mobile. They're great on PC but on mobile it's just inconvenient, an app is much better to use so makes sense to build one
The entire point of mobile apps is that they're mobile and can be pulled out anywhere at any time.
I'd always prefer a mobile app than opening the website in mobile browser. Nothing beats the native app experience
I am the opposite. I'll only download an app when I know I use it everyday. Otherwise I prefer the web.
I am using react native for building video calling app. Gotta say that react native is not the best to do it. It doesn't give performance like other languages. And also Webrtc library is missing lots of features which is included in react JS. Only advantage is that we can develop on both platform
Use agora
@@proNOOBIE_ That's an SDK. I don't know about Agora that much. Even though they will be using some kind of Webrtc. For mobile it will probably react native webtc. The normal web / desk SDK with Webrtc adapter doesn't play nicely with mobile platforms. And the mobile version might be missing a lot of things . For example stun switching since we don't get rtcrtpsender on mobile version
@@proNOOBIE_ Also I am not using third party SDK for this since it will limit the flexibility and features. Plus my company wants to make an SDK of their own
Ur forgetting how terrible web apps feel to use though, there’s an additional layer between user interaction and the actual interface that makes it feel like shit to use
Honestly, whenever I get a notification through chrome I straight up block the site. Looks tacky in the android UI.
Why not do both? Why does it just have to be one?
Ah yes, let me just take my laptop to the gym to listen to music on RUclips.
Ever heard of progressive web apps?
Man, even my AP seminar teacher taught me not to use random articles online as "research"
That's only an advantage if you have experience in webdev. If you are proficient with Java it'll be easier to write native android apps then go through some weird library to get a website (I'm neither so sorry if there's a very obvious solution)
That's a great point!
@@CodingWithLewis thx for knowledge
Agreed, very few companies have mobile apps. They’re there for when the company is already profitable
You are still living in the 2010 👀
Native mobile apps are optimised for better user experience on mobile. Web pages trying to work on a mobile app are mostly crap and annoy the hell out of me as a user. So nah.
So on android push notifications can be done?
Yes they can be!
There are many things around this. It's just I don't do mobile applications.
1. Mobile compatibility
2. Notifications
3. User friendliness
4. Type of applications
5. Application Wright
Many more...
As a wise man once said:
"Do not develop his app Jerry"
I don't think that man is very wise hahaha
“Eating soup with a spoon sounds fun, but you can already do it with a fork”
I WoUld jUst sTiCk tO tHe wEB
- some guy
I disagree with you completely on this sir.
Bro I’m trying so hard for months now to be an android app dev and this just made me shit my pants…
Hhhhhhhh i feel u bro
🤣 You are good dude!! Android devs is a high in demand industry.
Just stick one thing!
@@CodingWithLewis good thing then because my future depends on it 😅🤣
I am into flutter and i shit my pants too
Fun fact: Web developers can also target app stores by turning their websites into a Progressive Web app.
There's still a huge demand for native developers on the market and on average we earn more than frontend web developers...
That's very true :) I didn't say you shouldn't learn mobile apps!
Hey my dear app developers, come together and show this man why we and our work exists and why is it important and relevant even after so much advancement in web technologies
And one more thing, a web app/website can never replace a proper native mobile/desktop application.
It's not about just, creating APPs. We need professionals to maintain, to fix, to improve it. Like Daft punks say;
Work it
Make it
Do it
Makes us ( it )
Harder
Better
Faster
Stronger
In short, it is easier to use App instead of Web, As an experienced mobile app checker, I can confirm this 👍👍👍
I just can't imagine how many mobile dev students got demotivated and lost their interest in android devlopment by this video
A random guy on RUclips should not be able to demotivate them. Also, it doesn't say do not learn mobile development. 😊😊
If Google deprecating the Deprecated didn't demotivated them, how did this video do it? 😂
Would you say investing time into learning ios or andriod is a waste of time opposed to doing web languages? love the content btw
Absolutely not :) my point was that your next project might be better on the web!
@@CodingWithLewis Thanks for the info! appreciate it
I would recommend you to look into Flutter/Dart if you are not sure what to focus on. Flutter is getting better every year and the application runs on iOS, Android and the web. I stumbled across the same question and started learning Swift for iOS which I quit fast because I knew I wanted to include Android as well. That was before Apple introduced Swift UI which is great. All I am saying is: Web and mobile development are both options for building an application. Flutter combines the two worlds and what might have seemed as some more Framework Google will kill soon, it has become super popular. Major companies like Toyota are now using Flutter for embedded systems (That’s what I have read) because it can do so much. Start with Flutter if you want to make an application that runs everywhere.
I will still develop mobile apps 👍
This guy is single handedly gonna reduce the percentage of mobile devs in the coming years
Bro i learnt flutter dart programming language used to develop native mobile apps. But now I am worried after this video 🥲
You shouldn't be. Do some research yourself
Dont worry. I prefer the apps over web browser. I will use your app. 😂😂🤞
Building an app for your business/personal use is valuable
High performance left the chat
Like a wise man once said, "JS can be used for everything, but its not like it should be"
Gotta love those calculator Apps that need 200 MB of RAM to run.
You make a valid point that technically, anything achievable in an app can also be built on a website. However, it's important to consider factors like customer acquisition and monetization. App stores offer a massive global marketplace and streamlined monetization options, making it easier for developers to reach and profit from users. While it's possible to achieve similar results on the web, the convenience factor of app stores should not be underestimated when deciding between the two ways of publishing.
Your title isn't entirely correct. For a business it's true they need to evaluate whether a native mobile app would serve them. But what about the developers?
Developers need to make the right decision that will save them on development time :) that being said, mobile apps still have lots of use cases!
Screw this guy follow your dream pursue your visions you’ll be mad if you didn’t try.💯
People, try FLUTTER and you will love it. Engineers: please make more FLUTTER PACKAGES so that it would become the killer multi platform framework of our age. Flutter stands for F uck yeah it’s the future!
It's great but lacks backend resources
yeah mate +1 flutter is killer
@@trevortrevose9124 u can use firebase
Such a great point, the only other thing I can think of as to why apps are good are the ease of engagement. Websites seems to be more strained of interacting with them sometimes because they’re urls should be more readily available. I think people love icons also.
Imagine people spending thousands of dollars on a new iPhone just to access website
Yup that's what phones are
Long term this is a shot in the foot, tbh.
PWAs consistently ranks lower when packed and distributed in the mobile stores, users feel the clunky approach. The company I work for went from something like 3 stars in Play Store to 4.8 by just migrating their main screens to Flutter. It's like night and day. And the complaining we receive nowadays are mostly about the parts of the app that are still rendering the pwa through a WebView.
The change was so big they're planning to kill all PWAs code and their Swift codebase and unify everything into Flutter.
I'm with your thought 💭. yes web is way better than apps. most people don't know that.
The worst thing in history is those apps that are just a simple browser that will redirect you to the website of the application I freaking hate that
🥺🥺🥺😓 and i just started learning react native
don't worry man this doni is saying true things but andriod development will never die, it will if android dies but nevertheless if you master react native you can easily master another language or api cause you will learn core programming language from what you're doing rn, keep learning it will be of worth!
Don't you think anything like that.
React Native is the most high in demand for cross platform applications or mobile applications in general
You SHOULD build a mobile app (and that is the only correct video to make). A dev's job is to meet the needs of phone users and a half-assed website that is referred to as a "web app" to mislead people into using it, is not what we need. We need developers to actually do their job.
I start learn english and i watch you speak, is can be improve my english thank you 😍
Makes a good point but building one from scratch is good practice 👍
Crying in react native :)
same 😅
But if you know react native it’s very easy to transfer your skills to react?
@@dD-tn8tf hello ! Yes it's quite similar, but learning react will be better rather than learning react native first
@@Shalinity I use both all the time they are the same if anything its super easy to transfer your skills. TBH native apps are still really useful the mobile browser isn't ready for rendering heavy graphics just yet. This is why native apps are way better.
I would put a paper if asked me to work on hybrid
What he's saying is that it's ok to learn how to do it, but if you wanna be serious about it and actually create something, it should already be proven fit for the market. Otherwise, most of the stuff is now on the web.
And if you want to make sth i made with c# with html css js you should write 4 times more coding than c#
BRUH
I have to agree with this one WebApps are more lightweight than mobile application. WebApps are faster and more efficient. So you're right 👍 but creating a mobile application is also good to learn.
Agreed!
"Faster"? I don't think you know what you are talking about
@@codegambit2507 haha WebApps are faster maybe internet troubles is the problem, but web Apps are faster because on a mobile app the more the updates extra dependencies are being added to the app so this means less storage on the user's phone but websites and WebApps access files and other metadata with ease
@@CreativeTutorialsWeb I still don't think you know what you are talking about
@@codegambit2507 Yeah right okay then 😂
I have to agree that on paper most of these apps are useless, but most users still prefer to use the app version rather than the site
Or just use Flutter and build it everywhere
Not ideal for web. Flutter + react for website
There is a difference between knowing how to code and being a programmer. Thanks for telling us you know how to code😌
Oh right, cuz we all want our apps to load forever under the weight of numerous poorly optimized JavaScript frameworks. Boo-hoo, poor software engineers don’t wanna learn to build good software, so everyone should suffer. This is what software development has become. First we saw language abstractization. Who needs these pointers and memory management, ew, too hard. Better wrap every element and even every operator into a chain of classes! Now that’s fast - to develop, but not to run. And voilà, now everyone builds slow sh*tware prone to memory leaks. Now we see this f*cking tendency to build everything on the web. And who knows what next.
This is actually good news, because it makes cross-compatibility between platforms much easier.
Salute Lewis… awesome content as always… 👋🏻🇮🇹
Totally agreed because nowadays everybody are in rush many people do not have the time to download and still wait to install apps but rather just go to the browser and do stuffs. Aside from that, WEB IS THE FUTURE.
BS. Web is very far away from native experience. And it feels.
Not very far away at all, but it is behind still :)
@@CodingWithLewis Web browsers add another layer of software, and that can make for poor performance on low-end devices. Ask me how I know.
@@CodingWithLewis bro you don't know how to make native apps so you do this type of video correct??
This is a good point. I usually use the same few apps, buy websites I go to New ones constantly
Hands down worst video you’ve posted yet !
I respect your opinion 🙏
@@CodingWithLewis 🤣🤣
It is true it can be done on website, but the experiences not always be the same as native apps
Converting web apps to desktop apps however is a fantastic idea... If your web app needs to run local files without them being uploaded.
Yes, that's a bullshit.
Web apps are better for user acquisition, and mobile apps are better for engagement and retention.
If you’re building a new app, you should 100% start with the web, and move your users to the app later.
Yh but if you’re at an interview, you can pull out your app on your phone right there
Also ur website?
you can't do normal animations on the web, it's 50% user-friendliness
You are absolutely wrong. I've 10 years mobile app development experience, android java, iOS Swift, and Flutter.
Some of benefits of using mobile technologies instead of web technologies like javascript:
1. performance: javascript wrapped apps or web apps performe poorly on mobile phones
2. libraries: flutter, react native, java or swift have tons of libraries optimized for mobile apps. On the other hand, if you use javascript, you need to code everything from scratch.
note: If you need a website and same website as an app, it's okay to use React to develop.