WHAT JUST HAPPENED?! Elon Musk DENIED Seat on NEW Influential AI Safety Board
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 5 июн 2024
- How To Not Be Replaced By AGI • Life After AGI How To ...
Stay Up To Date With AI Job Market - / @theaigrideconomics
AI Tutorials - / @theaigridtutorials
🐤 Follow Me on Twitter / theaigrid
🌐 Checkout My website - theaigrid.com/
Links From Todays Video:
www.wsj.com/tech/ai/openais-s...
www.reuters.com/technology/us...
/ 1783857762252001715
www.dhs.gov/news/2024/04/26/o...
www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology...
Welcome to my channel where i bring you the latest breakthroughs in AI. From deep learning to robotics, i cover it all. My videos offer valuable insights and perspectives that will expand your knowledge and understanding of this rapidly evolving field. Be sure to subscribe and stay updated on my latest videos.
Was there anything i missed?
(For Business Enquiries) contact@theaigrid.com
#LLM #Largelanguagemodel #chatgpt
#AI
#ArtificialIntelligence
#MachineLearning
#DeepLearning
#NeuralNetworks
#Robotics
#DataScience 
Наука
Never underestimate the pettiness of modern politics. This is not about safety, it's about regulatory capture.
They are going to go against open source AI, that's why they let out 2 mayor corps that released open source models. I would advice guys in the US to start trying to download all the models they can before they turn off the tap.
@@paelnever I'm sure every "Accelerationist" is already doing that. They can use AI to "accelerate" societies collapse so they can start their own little rightwing fiefdoms.
It's about corporations trying to ensure their monopolies and the government trying to discover how can they tax it
BINGO
100% this is WAR
I’m not surprised about Elon. Not only is he the kind of guy to dismiss everything he disagrees with, but 5 minutes later he will blast everything on Twitter.
This definitely isn't a banana republic tier choke hold.
Who else is going to do it in the USA? Musk is unstable and shouldn't be anywhere near policy, IMO.
Regulatory capture. Tech leaders will do everything to get rid of competition.
It's about corporations trying to ensure their monopolies and the government trying to discover how can they tax it
I am SHOCKED that the 2 OPEN SOURCE guys are not included!
Elon Musk isn't an open source guy. He open sourced an old version of Grok that's 500 billion parameters but has worse performance than most small locally-run models. And he did it to try and bury the OpenAI ClosedAI lawsuit bs where everyone was pointing him out for being hypocritical.
@thearchitect5405 so many people are fooled by Elon. It reminds me of Trump.
I’m glad that the tech CEOs are on the board. It’ll keep things moving quickly. Accelerate, accelerate, accelerate.
Accelerate, accelerate, accelerate societies collapse.
@@rightwingdelusions7292 society is collapsed right now with nothing to indicate that we can fix it. Our machines, however, can do exactly that.
@pkfryer It sounds like you just started thinking about these ideas with the release of Chat GPT if that’s the extent of what you have to offer. 🤣🤡
@@Greg-xi8yx says the guy who offers up 2 emoji's
@pkfryer AI will only continue to be developed. There's no doubt that it's a race. Who do you want to win that race? Communist China or the US? With only those two choices on the table, what is your choice? What is the better choice for humanity? It is America's duty and obligation to win.
1) "Follow the money!"
Especially political contributions, and family employment.
2) Meta, from get-go, was very adamant about wanting to have regulatory oversight.
Some would argue regulation provides barriers of entry to competition. However, Open Source requires less government oversight.
3) Elon Musk exposing the relationship with Twitter and the U.S. government didn't set him up as "a team player".
The relationship Elon Musk has with the Chinese government could be a factor.
4) If push comes to shove for creating policy, Meta and X will have the most potential weight to create a ground swell of influence.
The Foxes are definitely guarding the Henhouse. We are the Hens 🦊🐔🐥🐓🍗
Did you ACTUALLY JUST SAY, "if you aren't familiar with social media" in a RUclips VIDEO?
These days RUclips videos are written by GPT-1 running on the uploader's local washing machine
@@cortaisfashion5106😂 but true!
Open Borden architect in charge of AI…what could go wrong? Sweet baby Jesus.
Strangely missing is the Military Industrial Complex on the board(???). Anyone else find this highly suspect?
they already have ex CIA in openAI board so it doesnt matter. plus the government is already overseeing everything, if they dont like anything they'll just shut it down or use it for themselves under nation security. Like if we every get free energy they would never release it under the guise of national security. This why I think the safety teams at AI companies are a joke. no one really cares for safety. they'll use all the AI tech in military first before giving it to civilians
While not on the board, I’m sure military reps will be meeting with them
@@BlimeyMCOC curious no? They had the internet for decades before rolling it out to the public yet seems nobody asks how long they had AGI before they began this parade of actors performing this charade.
@@dalerohling5989 not the vibes I’m getting tbh. I honestly don’t know what the military might’ve used machine learning for other than like automated detection with sensors and online data. Now with some autonomous drones and targeting. Don’t get me wrong I’m sure they’re excited to get their hands on stuff, but right now it’s still hypothetical. Computing power has only made training these things possible fairly recently, and industry people kind of got caught by surprise.
Is Google on the board?
I guess they passed the filter on performance of Gemini!!!!
More people need to hear about this!
Elon is into power grid, transportation and Manufacturing. Seems like a way to handicap him using Homeland Security as the Gestapo.
This is a good sign, the timeline to AGI is now speeded up, due to AI companies now controlling the AI laws and restrictions.
If you really think we're any closer to AGI with this development you have brainrot
This is no surprise whatsoever
Safety and Security Board. Mayorkas. The utter lack of safety and security involving our borders. Does anyone actually think this is going to work out well?
This might become the death of open source AI in America.
M$ and gugel also have their own social media, the excuse is terribly bad. The real reason is open source, open sourcing things don't likes the big bosses, that's why both companies that open sourced big models are out. Nothing strange. Never mind, open source will overrun them.
The issue is the open source is a distributed effort while they are a concentrated *paid* effort. It'll take a lot of hobbyist and those not worried about income to spend time closely that gap or more importantly innovating. It's not impossible, just "unlikely".
why did you misspell? just curious
@@GaryMillyz Misspell what?
Hi, I am subscribed to your channel, thanks for the informative analyses! A question: in one of your videos, within the past 1-2 months, you analysed a paper (from Google?) on AI in Health, I cannot locate it now, could you please point me to that video/section, or simply paste the paper here? Thank you very much!
This is a disaster in the making. "Leaders" in civil rights, academia, public policy, and government don't have a good track record of making wise decisions. Our worst nightmare involving AI development and its alignment with humanity is coming true. Frontier AI and AGI/ASI _must_ be open source (led by The People) to achieve the highest benefits for all of humanity.
Who are "The People?" I don't want communism to take over and that's exactly what "The People" sounds like. Communist China is awesome at propaganda. How do you think China was overthrown and communism instituted? "The People" were duped into overthrowing their own government so "The People" could be in charge. It didn't turn out well. We must fight communism wherever we see it, and most importantly when it seemingly springs up from "The People." Behind those people is a plan that includes subjugation of the very people who are naive enough to support the scheme.
Having people from Microsoft and open AI in charge a regulation?... Sounds like a conflict of interest to me. These are the people that benefit the most.
I agree this is regulatory capture however Elon would absolutely still be regulatory capture too and of all the people who could have been on that board, Elon would have been the worst.
Yup roses two aren’t just social media. Whomp. Those two are open source.
Seems a bit suspicious that not all industry leaders in AI are present, but I guess government sees industry as one face, that one face from AI industry is good enough.
Considering his track record with the (un)safety of Tesla "auto"pilot, it's very reasonable to not let Elon have influence in AI safety matters.
Ha interesting, so if any of the other comitees opens a social media platform they get booted from their seat as well? What? No?
Very clear to see what happened here
I'd rather Elon Musk had a say ! I'd trust him over zuck and others any day. He also has shown he can make shit happen
I'd rather not.
@@oscarmoreno7774 how come? I'm interested in a different viewpoint . Maybe you know things I don't.
@@gabriellefox5724 fail
Supporters of the Biden regime don't like Musk because he exposed the deep state's relationship with Twitter, and restored free speech to the public discourse, effectively ending their monopoly on narrative and allowing their political enemies to compete in the free marketplace of ideas, for the first time in years. He is also openly opposed to their woke ideology, and frequently criticises loony gender activists. Petty reasons, to be sure, but that's all they need. @@gabriellefox5724
tell me psychopaths will be in charge of AI without telling me...
mega corporations and government will be in charge of AI
It's so ironic that everything we've been warned about all these years is happening right now and nobody can do anything to change it. Decentralisation of seems the best option for a fair share to everyone. Keep in mind that any side can and will do bad with ai so I prefer everyone being able to.
While I don't think the big boys should solely be on this "board" it is pretty stupid not to include Elon (And.. Zuck). Although I bet a lot of petty games from the big boys regardless. Well Idk about *all* of them, but.. yeah.
Maybe there’s a reason they didn’t add those weird ass guys.
Elon is just a trust fund baby who buys his way into putting his name on companies.
I think including alphabet is a mistake since it, like social media companies, is funded by advertising. But the other tech firms seem to have legitimate security products and services
@TheAIGRID, did you clone your voice?
Please use a pop-filter on your microphone! (nice video)
Woah!! Great video - thank you.
Elon and Mark can just make their own AI safety company, this is super toxic though people will trust AI more if Elon is backing it this is just a fact since his voice was so loud in AI safety more than anyone else that clearly stands out
The only people that should be on the board are the people that have a lot of money and are also developing AI because they are the most knowledgable
This is a dangerous step into AI
Big tech leaders should have no place on such a board nor should they be dictating to the public what is ethical.
Emad mostaque with Peter diamandis had a very enlightening conversation about this about a month ago on utube. Hopefully that while paper is out soon.
I fully thought this happened a week ago
We remain safe as long as AI-controlled robots are not used in law enforcement AND the board resists adopting collectivist and centralized control philosophies. Otherwise, the board could gain more power than many countries, potentially creating a new dominant power structure. A solution could be to create individual and independent or individually controlled AI robots with differing opinions, ensuring that at least half would disagree with any decision to overthrow humans :).
It is very odd that Elon Musk is not on this board of safety…
granted i dont have a lot of faith in the people they will appoint, but how could you for a minute think its a good thing that these tech billionaires regulate their own industry? wake up people
How do you go this long in the AI space without learning anything about Elon Musk? And furthermore, how do you manage to simp so fucking hard for him when you know so little about him?
Leaders in acadamia and civil rights 🤭
AI lives in the Twilight Zone somewhere between Pandora's Box and a can of worms. I doubt that any form of regulation will be enough to rein it in.
Blatant Regulatory capture
Suddenly I don't trust my government to do the right thing. This is just another way to control and not about what is good for humanity.
partners with baidu for FSD? too close to chyna?
Yeah, cause Google isn’t a conflict of interest😂😂😂😂.
If you opensource your model, you aren't welcome.
regulatory captute
BASICALLY it's PRETTY PRETTY CRAZY that your vocabulary is so limited, it's INSANE AND SHOCKING THE INDUSTRY!!!!
Zuck and Elon are out because they screwed us on the cage match they promised. After the fight I say we let the winner in. 🏆😊
may be Elon Musk is going to relocate to China?
Lmao like it would be better at all.
By using big tech AI, you are digging your own graves
Elon didn’t create open ai… social media has incontrovertibly caused harm and continues to do so… the last thing we need is social media at the forefront of AI safety.
Anyone who would argue social media doesn’t spread misinformation is either arguing in bad faith or is arguing out of total ignorance.
They also didn’t invite legacy media board members… why would they include anyone who is the head of media companies and AI safety.
FB and X are first and foremost media platforms… their bread and butter is monetizing its users and engagement.
Lastly you wouldn’t form a brand new governing body with people whom have no practical understanding of the technology in question… that would literally make zero sens
If it were regulatory capture you would want people from the same companies… not competitor’s… and a mixture.
having competitors is the safest way to blunt collusion.
The lack of critical thinking on display never ceases to AMAZE and ASTOUND, it’s SHOCKING.
Well, MY P(doom) just got increased by a huge margin. Did yours?
Oh, and that's BOOMER, not DOOMER... lol
AI safety is really just a smokescreen.
So primates are trying to control the infinity smarter unstoppable AI
If MAYORKAS was on board, i guess i would be out too.
Regulation/governance is good, as long as u can vote to replace the regulators. U wouldn't want to be on the board neway.
& theyre all marxist hegelian dialects.
Great news!
Outrageous hypocrisy... on tax payer money
Joke board
He’s a terrible person
wishy washy garbage
Ahhh, that EXPLAINS why Trump was excluded...
Good, Elon shouldn't be involved in anything of incredible importance.
That’s what I’m saying
Mark my words, zuck will be in.
They just didn't want to ONLY leave Musk out bc he's petty and would throw a gear in the works.
Lmao thank god, Elon is a fail, that’s why they didn’t let him be in it.