Thank you. Years of hard work, you know. I'm going to have to correct you though: The Ibanez does not sound "better". Compared to what? By What measure? And who decides? "Better FOR what" is the real question though, isn't it. Each guitar I have has different sounds for different applications. Sometimes it's glaring, sometimes subtle, but all different for a reason. The Tone of the Ibanez, with a cheap GuitarHeads humbucker in the bridge, is perfect for old-school things like Ozzy or King Diamond, while the Dean is bold and brazen and better suited for things like ZZ Top to Anthrax. The Jackson is a thrash machine that really likes to pretend it's Joe Satriani. The Yamaha covers a lot of ground. There is no "better here. It's about what tool does best for the job you need it for. And sometimes, you have to put 2 different ones together to get the overall sound "just right". To a hammer, everything looks like a nail, I suppose.
Magic guitars!
It's a snap!
🤘😎🤘
🖖😸🤌
Hey Man. Awesome agility. Ibanez sounds better anyway.
Thank you. Years of hard work, you know. I'm going to have to correct you though: The Ibanez does not sound "better". Compared to what? By What measure? And who decides?
"Better FOR what" is the real question though, isn't it. Each guitar I have has different sounds for different applications. Sometimes it's glaring, sometimes subtle, but all different for a reason. The Tone of the Ibanez, with a cheap GuitarHeads humbucker in the bridge, is perfect for old-school things like Ozzy or King Diamond, while the Dean is bold and brazen and better suited for things like ZZ Top to Anthrax. The Jackson is a thrash machine that really likes to pretend it's Joe Satriani. The Yamaha covers a lot of ground. There is no "better here. It's about what tool does best for the job you need it for. And sometimes, you have to put 2 different ones together to get the overall sound "just right".
To a hammer, everything looks like a nail, I suppose.