Hey guys! If you liked the video, we would love for you to share it on social networks like Facebook, Reddit, Instagram, Tik Tok and Twitter.(Since the algorithm is not helping us in terms of views). You will support the Insane Curiosity community to grow and improve more and more our upcoming content. A big thank you!
@@bobbart4198 hey there is one part everyone misses out, the lake in Ireland where geologists discovered an ice age can get into full swing within the time frame of a few months. It really is a much bigger problem than most realise 👍
@@GlitchfaceDan ... My reply to Eyeolsis was just a reaction to HIS (Her ?) comment, he (she ?) opined upon the Video-maker's research - without being specific ... that ALWAYS bugs me ...but Merry Christmas to YOU, just the same ...🤓
some people believing that electric cars are going to stop climate change are unable to charge their cars because the charging stations are frozen. LOL
*Was the Garden of Eden supercharged with atmospheric CO2?* Fact... All human activity = only 4% of Global CO2 production today. Volcanoes alone, are dumping more CO2 into the atmosphere in a matter of weeks than humans do in a year. Fact... Colorless, odorless atmospheric CO2 is the exact opposite of air pollution, and actually stimulates healthy plant and animal growth.. Fact... The 500,000,000 year average for atmospheric CO2 is well over 1,000 ppm. Fact... During the Age of Dinosaurs, atmospheric CO2 was well over 5,000 ppm. Since the last Ice Age 12,000 years ago, atmospheric CO2 has doubled to 420 ppm. . Can you see how far from "normal" CO2 levels we still are today? . *Stop feeling guilty about human activity creating CO2.* As long as the trends are towards a warmer climate, we all have to stop being afraid of our naturally changing climate over time, adapt, and enjoy the ride (my opinion). Who disagrees with any of these facts?... Anyone? All of these facts are easy to prove true, so, who/what is promoting Global Fear of Climate Change, and why are they doing it? Answer:... If you have not personally investigated the World Ecinomic Forum Great Reset 2030 Agenda yet, now's the time.
Its physics. Warming occurs as the system seeks its new equilibrium. Basically; the adding of CO2 to the atmosphere changes the thermal equilibrium point between the planet's climate system and space. "Returning" the system to equilibrium manifests as global warming.
@alaxt.6215 😂😂😂😂😂😂 i, you do know the only threat to human extinction from the climate is a full on ice age right? Do you know that less people are dying from extreme weather events than any time in recent human history? That more people die from extreme cold weather than extreme warm weather. That currently the earth is greener and more fertile because of the warmer climate . Every year since the 60s the earth has been getting greener, "except for the few years in the 70s when the planet was cooling"
2 things: 1. The warming effect of carbon dioxide varies with it's concentration in the atmosphere but the relationship is not linear, it is exponential. So each increase in carbon dioxide concentration results in less warming than the one before until saturation is attained and further increases make no practical difference. 2 The sun is not just a big lightbulb in the sky. It's output varies in cycles of approximately 11 years. Strictly speaking 11 years is a half cycle as after 11 years the Sun's magnetic poles reverse and technically speaking a solar cycle is approximately 22 years. Most cycles are strong but currently we are heading into grand solar minimum, similar to the Maunder minimum, so in a year or two we might even be able to have frost fairs on the Thames here in the UK. It won't be an ice age as the underlying trend is still to warming and once this cold period is over we should have warming again. However it will reveal that no matter how many more coal-fired power stations are built in places like China (please do your own research, there's info on the web) it's not humans that control the climate.
The carbon issues are are nonsense. The rest in this report seems realistic. The carbon has been much much higher in the past and didn't effect the temperature but did help plants grow.
There are theories that the sun's output is also dependent on it's trajectory around the milky way. When our arm (the Orion arm) of the galaxy passes through gaseous secondary arms, we have a heating period. When it enters into more vacuous space, we have cooling. The theories credit the gas from blocking cosmic rays that inhibit solar output. I prefer to think of it as pouring gas on a fire. The sun's gravity entrains the extra hydrogen into it's fiery furnace.
i dont know, one minute there will be an ice age, then o no methane will make things hotter then we are at the end of an ice age, then methane increase even when after plandemic methane producction deminish, one minute polar ice caps are metling and then supposly acording to artic study they have increase, honestly, i am now convince these is all bs
@@jonbulau5963 There is no ice up there. Go onto Google earth and street view and there’s a ship up there you can go onto. That will show you there’s no ice there.
The polar caps ought to be there They both North and South polar caps are consider to the Earth's Air Conditioner system Usually it colder in South during the Northern Hemipshere Summers and opposite for Southern Hemipshere The more the degree of the polar caps the hotter the Summer's The lesser degrees during the winter months could also mean colder and wetter Northern Hemisphere.
If I’m driving an EV, recycling plastic, not eating red meat, and not using my A/C, how is there still any global warming? I feel I may have been mislead. Turning the A/C on now, while I through some burgers on the grill.
There is a global warming still because well idk. Look at the factories dude? Or actual data about how much co2 and other gasses humanity produces? Global warming is a GLOBAL issue. One person not using A/C changes nothing. This issue has to be dealt with globally
We are in the extreme age.... Extremely cold Extremely hot Extremely wet Extremely dry Extremely disappointed Extremely triggered. Extremely stupid.......... Either way extremely screwed 😕😞😕😞😕😞
I've held in my hand a fossil from Antarctica. It has a leaf on one side & a fern frond on the other...... About 18 million years old. I don't mind saying I felt oddly emotional. We're all here for a good time, not a long time. I hope the 'good time' starts sometime soon despite the lunacy & panic porn from the so called experts. Very good video, thanks.
6:57, False. CO2 like any other gases have absolutly no greenhouse effect, because gases do not hold or transfert heat, therefore the effect is insignificant on global climate. Higher global CO2 always comes after a warmer period, not before.
Lot of variables involved. Simple experiment, can you tie up your thumb and lift a pan or glass - no. Can you tie up your leg and try to run a 100 meter sprint - no? So how are we destroying components after components of the earth and expect everything to run normally.. It won't! The earth is a huge engine. Its alive. Its keeping us alive. Plants just don't grow in their own, life just doesn't appear on its own. People have to understand this quickly and stop damaging our climate further. Its already too late, however let's not pose this small window of opportunity.
Of course! Ever since we figured out how to increase our understanding of the world around us, we have begun to question the existence of God, until we realized, we ARE God. Very convenient.
Very good, except it is the Ice Age we are still in is punctuated by short interglacial warm periods. The current period peaked with the Holocene Climate Optimum (for humans) ~8500 years ago, with temperatures trending colder since. The four latest warm periods' temperatures over time have followed very similar trajectories. By that measure, Earth's temp has peaked, and is trending back to the normal, long glacial periods typical of the last 800,000 years, with ~5000 years to go. Not mentioned in your video is the absolute solar output of the Sun and the effects of catastrophic extraterrestrial impacts. Look for by name, Younger Dryas Extinction. To sum it up, the Earth goes through normal glacial periods of 80 to 130 thousand years, interrupted by interglacial periods of 8 to 33 thousand years. CO2 effect is currently saturated, with less and less effect with further increases. Paying wealthy overlords will not stop Nature's cycles.
Current global temperature is much warmer now than it was 8,000 years ago during the Holocene Climate Optimum. Global temperature was on a long gradual drop since 8,000 years ago, sliding into a new glacial period, but it suddenly reversed in the late 1970s and has been rocketing higher since then.
@@johncoviello8570 if you don’t know real history ,and you don’t realise that the level of lies and corrupted data currently being spouted as real is a pack of lies, then you are in a very small minority here and ignorant of the reality that AGW is the greatest fraud ever perpetrated.
the first sentence of this video is factually incorrect. the Earth is in an inter-glacial period during a current Ace Age. why in the world cant these people get their facts straight?
Why is it, that articles like this one ALWAYS mix - and mix up - the use of "X number of years ago, and X number of years bce" ?? They reference a source that states something happened 8,000 years bce, and state it as 8,000 years ago. Or vica- versa. It happened 10,000 years ago, and they insert bca. Each time that happens, it introduces a 2,000 year inaccuracy in the narrative. Very confusing. Totally messes up the chronology of events. Please check your dates.
Perhaps on a geologic time scale we are on the "verge" of colder temperatures, but that is still many hundreds if not thousands of years in the future. The Milankovitch cycles are not going to realign for a few thousand more years. And besides CO2 levels are already 50% higher then prior to every past glacial period during the Pleistocene epoch. And that will delay any near potential term cooling like the little Ice Age.
Engineer and Scientist here. I am working on developing contingency systems. This is really going to happen. At the rate at which were burning fossil fuels, global warming has accelerated, heating up the atmosphere and oceans. This has caused glaciers to melt at an unprecedented rate. This affects the salinity of the water changing the physical and chemical properties of water creating changes in ocean currents. The AMOC current has already slowed down drastically. Not only that there's a sharp increase in the number of volcanic eruptions and earthquakes across the world. Moreover we're already seeing a lot of cyclones, hurricanes, tornadoes, incessant rains, floods, glacier bursts, cloud bursts. All indicating that there is a huge climate shift. Have to be ready for this one.
Sorry but there hasn't been any increase in frequency or severity in either anti-cyclones or cyclones. That is very widely documented it only in the media space that that claim exists. No Carbon dioxide increase isn't statistically significant to earth temperature and carbon dioxide as a percentage of the atmosphere lags temperature warming indicating there another more significant force at play. This video makes absolutely no mention of the earth magnetic field decline which has been significant and we are due for polar reverse probably within the next 50 years. Earth field strength determines charge particle interaction in the upper atmosphere and the rate of destruction of ozone. It is just silly to focus on the limited and minor effect of carbon dioxide. Glaciers have been further north by 100km between 8000 to 6500 years ago when carbon dioxide level where hovering at 200ppm and temperatures where globally warmer by 0.9 degrees than today. So no carbon dioxide isn't the key but other earth science is!!
I was exposed to 'the axial-rotation' in my early-education in school in Kingston, Jamaica in the 50s before emigrating North and never heard of anything like it until now .. !
I was watching this until those annoying intrusive adds interrupted my viewing so I only watch up to the adds now and make sure what ever is being advertised I will avoid like the plague...
The Northern Hemisphere entered a Glacial Age 2.8MY. The Southern Hemisphere entered a Glacial Age around 35MY. While the Milankovich Cycles play a major role. Plate Tectonics is an even bigger factor. The creation of the Ismuths of Panama due to tectonic activity blocked the transfer of warm water from the Pacific to the Atlantic. This resulted in less warm water penetrating into the higher latitudes of the Atlantic. The separation of South America from Antarctica allowed for the creation of the Circumpolar Current.
It would have helped if at the first sentence they didn't confuse 'ice age' with 'glaciation'. The last glaciation ended about 12, 000 years ago. We are still in an Ice Age that began about 2.6 million years ago.
For 74 years I've heard. Ice age, heating up, ice age, heating up. This planet is made to take care of it's self. So it's all a bunch of bla bla bla bla bla! We've got way more than this to worry about.
Except the so called "ice age" shit is bullshit. No real scientist really think that we are heading to the ice age. Listen to real science instead of building your knowledge on shitty clickbait wideo on youtube
@@Talkathon408 When I lived in southern England (specifically Winchester) the normal temperature range was 30deg F to 85deg F. In the years I was there we had a couple of snow events, one to two inches lasting a few days. In the period I was talking about in my original comment, the snow was deep and lasted the winter. So, if the Gulf Stream was there then (I fully agree it was), then how do you explain the conditions? What I was really trying to convey was that if the Gulf Stream is altered, it is not the end of the world. Just look across the North Sea at Norway. Finally, my comment on the Gulf Stream was meant to be ironic. Sorry, that did not come across.
@@louisgiokas2206 It may have slowed down a bit but I think scientists think that the last time thermohaline circulation shutdown in the North Atlantic was during the Younger Dryas stadial and the conditions were almost glacial then and lasted about 1000 years. As in the ice sheets expanded, maybe as far as southern Norway... So things could potentially get pretty bad if it happened again. Actually Louis, I forgot to mention that global temperature did stabalise for a few decades after ww2 due to burning of coal and the presence of aerosols in the upper atmosphere, so that may explain cooler winters in southern England around the time. As an aside I happen to live close to Winchester and have done for the past 25 years.
@@Talkathon408 Oh, what town? I really loved the area. I learned fly fishing in Stockbridge. I had an Alfa Romeo GTV and loved tooling around the area with my sons, who could fit in the back seats at the time. I was even elected to the Board of Governors of the primary school my sons attended. It was a wonderful experience. I could go on, as I am wont to do. Of course, if the ice sheets expand in the way they did before, that is the end of global warming, isn't it? If they get that big, then it should also mean the end of sea level rise as well. You mention the time after WWII. Interestingly, the clearing of the air in the US through strict emission controls has been speculated as a source of the warming locally. On the other hand, in China today the air is massively polluted. Now they seem to be having winter weather, including heavy snow, a bit earlier than usual. Maybe a connection?
The Little Ice age created winters with Ice on the Thames up to 2 feet thick,they had Ice Fairs until 1812. It occurred because the Sun went to sleep from 1645 to 1725.
In Australia, which is the oldest continent on earth, I have studied different rock formations all over the to make sense of what I have found, I studied everything I could find to explain and corroborate my observations. It is very obvious to see from geological observations that the information on this video is absolutely correct. However there is more to be said. I love you people ❤️ 🎉❤🎉😊
🌪 🌍🌌 I also have some problems with "sudden stratospheric warming". 🔄 Big events like "Ingunn" moved air from the the tropics towards the polar see, 🌎🏖↗☃ heating the stratosphere through the accelerated polar vortex, a convective system. The oceanic currents can´t stop before the Earth´s rotation ends. Both is caused by balancing the gyroscope´s centrifugal force (accelerating masses closer to the poles towards the equator 🛖↙🍙) and centripetal gravitation, both modulated by centripetal force, bold relief or coastlines. Heating and cooling (or salt) induce some densitity changes, affecting the height or depth of molecules´ movement. Centrifugal force would prefere 🪐, spherical gravitation 🌐, a perfect rounded (atmo)sphere. If climate models ignore that fundamental forces, they must produce data garbage.
If it put billions of tons of particulates into the atmosphere, then there would be cooling due to making the atmosphere opaque. But seeing as it was almost entirely water, then it will have a warming effect (water vapour is the dominant greenhouse gas in the atmosphere) until it has fallen out again. (which it has been doing with abundance here in Australia since it erupted).
Water vapour is a potent greenhouse gas when in the stratosphere. When the eruption injected water vapour into that level, the greenhouse warming addition effectively ate up our remaining carbon budget in one day. Shade or evaporation loss was vastly eclipsed by the addition of heat trapping moisture in the upper atmosphere.
@@danwatson171 Technically, to be semantically and scientifically correct, there is no such thing as a greenhouse gas in the earth's atmosphere because the earth is not an enclosed greenhouse with a glass enclosure in the stratosphere. CO2 is added to plant greenhouses up to like 1000 ppm (0.10 %)(normal is 400 ppm or 0.04+ %) to speed up plant growth since, the more CO2 inside, the more photosynthesis occurs more quickly making plants grow faster. (CO2 is absolutely a critical trace gas essential to almost all life on earth, plant and animal.) Heat is separately added using natural gas or propane heaters to make the greenhouse warmer and also increase the plant growth rate. The glass holds this added heat in longer before it escapes/conducts to the cooler outside through the glass. Heat and energy in warmer objects always goes to cold or colder objects. This is the Second law of Thermodynamics. There are no exceptions in our environment. The analogy of a " greenhouse gas "in earth's atmosphere and that earth is a greenhouse is totally false and a very misunderstood and misleading analogy of the actual original physical plant greenhouse and how it works and the added CO2 gas purpose. This false analogy has fooled billions of people either through innocent misunderstandings of physics, heat transfer other sciences, or outright dishonesty by some. Gases or any objects can not and do not trap heat. Heat or energy can not be permanently trapped. It goes or moves by conduction, convection or radiation to cold or cooler objects. It's just a matter of time with a delay. Weather is a heat transfer mechanism. Water vapor has a very high latent heat capacity that is a huge key to the weather on earth. CO2 (400+ ppm or 0.04%) is basically almost irrelevant compared to warm water vapor, typically 1% to 4 %, which rises in the earth's atmosphere carrying the latent heat by convection where it cools/condenses releasing latent heat forming clouds and radiating heat into space (4 degrees Kelvin). Gases also transfer energy among themselves kinetically by molecular collisions. Nitrogen is 78% and Oxygen 21% of the air. Argon is 0.9+ % and CO2 is 0.04+%. Water vapor is nor typically included in the total % because it varies so widely. Hurricanes, typhoons, thunderstorms wind, etc. are massive heat transfer mechanisms that cool the atmosphere and move heat energy up to the stratosphere where it is radiated into space. Warmer to colder. The First Law of Thermodynamics is energy can not be created or destroyed. The energy or heat added to earth leaves earth (basically with a delay). The earth basically is in balance and self regulates its overall temperature over time. This is a simplification to try to explain in somewhat plainer language how things really work. Weather and climate are insanely complicated and are not really understood as a science as should be obvious to any thoughtful person. My apologies to all as I am not trying to insult or belittle anyone here. To some, I hope this helps to provide a somewhat larger macro picture and is not so deep in the weeds that it is incomprehensible.
Changes we are seeing in the atmosphere caused by Tonga are highly likely short term, as that eruption might raise the risk that at least one year in the next five will temporarily exceed the 1.5C warming threshold. Climate trends take at least 30 years to show. It will take an eruption more powerful than Tonga’s to affect a climate trend, a volcanic eruption bigger than any in human history. Basically an event like Tonga in the long run will work out to zero as a climate forcing over the long-term considering the prediction from main stream climate science is a possibility of only a temporary increase in temp for a short period. If the Tonga eruption does push the global mean temp up globally temporarily; still insignificant in regard to long-term climate trend, but not for the stratosphere, as it has created a wide range of potential long-lasting repercussions for its global composition and dynamics. A much bigger concern is how its chemistry affects ozone variations causing an impact on sea ice and sea surface temperature.
Why is there oil deep in the ocean if it only comes from dead plants and animals? Is it because the crust is always moving and the oil deposits were at at some point dry land?
Oil isn't a fossil anything, and it doesn't come from plants or animals. Saturn's moon Titan has hundreds of times more liquid hydrocarbons than all the known oil and natural gas reserves on Earth, according to new data from NASA's Cassini spacecraft. And there is no life on Titan.
Great question! The magnetic pole drifting doesn't directly affect global temperatures. The poles move slowly over time due to changes in Earth's core, but it's the climate factors like greenhouse gases and ocean currents that really influence temperature. However, the pole shift does affect things like navigation and Earth's magnetic field, which plays a role in protecting us from solar radiation.
The problem editor. To start with is by the Time earths in a ice age the cycle will be starting over with one single cell organism at a time like it did billons of years ago because all himans and life on Earth won't survive the extreme heat and extreme conditions on earth we will face first
*Was the Garden of Eden supercharged with atmospheric CO2?* Fact... All human activity = only 4% of Global CO2 production today. Volcanoes alone, are dumping more CO2 into the atmosphere in a matter of weeks than humans do in a year. Fact... Colorless, odorless atmospheric CO2 is the exact opposite of air pollution, and actually stimulates healthy plant and animal growth.. Fact... The 500,000,000 year average for atmospheric CO2 is well over 1,000 ppm. Fact... During the Age of Dinosaurs, atmospheric CO2 was well over 5,000 ppm. Since the last Ice Age 12,000 years ago, atmospheric CO2 has doubled to 420 ppm. . Can you see how far from "normal" CO2 levels we still are today? . *Stop feeling guilty about human activity creating CO2.* As long as the trends are towards a warmer climate, we all have to stop being afraid of our naturally changing climate over time, adapt, and enjoy the ride (my opinion). Who disagrees with any of these facts?... Anyone? All of these facts are easy to prove true, so, who/what is promoting Global Fear of Climate Change, and why are they doing it? Answer:... If you have not personally investigated the World Ecinomic Forum Great Reset 2030 Agenda yet, now's the time.
The entire Galaxy is moving, so we have never been where we are now. Humans want to see patterns, but there really is no pattern to climate or ice ages. The only constant in the universe is change.
Exactly. We ain't seen nothing yet. There are patterns, but we have not been around long enough to perceive the larger ones. Homo Sapiens is around 20,000 years old. It takes around 250 million years for the sun to orbit the galaxy. We have only experienced an infinitesimally small fraction of what's out there.
@@hartshepherd5060 You are speaking bullshit now. We have studied past. We know that we altered existing cycles and that will harm us pretty bad. "When scientists focus on climate from before the past 100-150 years, they use records from physical, chemical, and biological materials preserved within the geologic record. The Earth holds climate clues dating back over three billion years, contained in rock layers, polar ice sheets, lake beds, and more". Stop speaking bullshit and ask why billionaires are polluting earth destroying our future.
1:20 an annual increase of 1% which would bring its level up to what 0.045%? I don't think so because the Great Lakes long ago emptied into the Mississippi River and eventually the Gulf of Mexico which would have done a lot more to disrupt the ocean conveyor circulation then an annual increase of 1% of CO2
I noticed this phenomenon while looking at the raw data from a global warming article in Scientific American around 1986 or so. I'm glad someone else noticed.
This video uses a click bait title to draw people in, but in the latter part of the video states that it is uncertain when the next ice age will occur. This video also claims that given past climate conditions it is understanable to question the current accepted causes of global warming. This is a false statement because for one we know that the current warming is due to an increase in GHG and recently due to the decrease in sulphur dioxide emissions from ocean going vessels as mandated by stronger clear air standards. And sure there is some natural variablility that could lead to some of the current warmin, but that is secondary to the impact of the first two factors.
Michael Mann's "hockey stick" makes its appearance. Given that the weight of the ice has depressed Antarctica about 2000 feet, how is Antarctica going to be able to drift off of south pole? Regarding the snowball earth, also consider that the sun was not as bright then as it is today. The sun will get brighter as it ages towards its end of life on the main sequence.
That "hockey stick" was made from two different data. That level one was measured data and the fast rising end was modelled, and that is very big nono in science. But it was the great beginning to money flow from us to them, so why any scientist would refuse money? Just follow the money and you find the truth.
@@ollirantala The original hockey stick chart is irrelevant, as others exploring the same question with better statistical methods, more evidence, and higher resolution that did it much it better than Bradley, Mann, and Hughes, corroborated the finding instead. That's why MBH1998 is superseded. When it's been done better and better with the same result, the original is historic but not important as the science develops. The irony is funding from the Koch Brothers and the oil industry hired a team to bust it and came up with the same results to their chagrin. Every reconstruction of historical temperature published since the original has ended up being some form of hockey stick shape.
People don't take into consideration or realize what a volatile place this planet really is with all this water and the magnetic poles flipping around constantly every 12 1/2 thousand years.... It may appear Serene at first glance from up there but it's actually quite a dangerous place!
There is no reason to expect the forcings of solar irradiance and Milankovitch cyclles, which are in a cooling phase, can overcome anthropogenic greenhouse gases. The last glaciation of the Pleistocene will be the last until CO2 goes back down, if ever.
If earth has Global warming and Global freezing at the same time will we be saved .😮 I can't take it anymore, I'm going back to my cave in the mountains. 3/13/24
Technically we are still in a ice age. The glaciers have retreated. It will take centuries for the glacial maximum to occur. It took the Laurentide ice sheet to formed over much North America Centuries to cover the northern half of the continent. We will be long gone before major glaciation occurs.
CO2 is NOT a greenhouse gas and a 1% rise in CO2 levels is only 4 ppm which is almost nothing compared to the much higher levels in the past ! Actually the nowadays CO2 levels are at historical lows !
Thank you for your comment. CO2 is a greenhouse gas, and even small increases can significantly impact our climate. While CO2 levels have been higher in the past, the current rapid increase is concerning because it disrupts the balance that supports our modern climate.
So the warming due to El nino has cool counterpart during short day months? What will be the effects of Frigid Himalayan peaks to Indochina region and Phil and Indonesia in case new ice age repeats?
It is unlikely we go through another ice age anytime soon. The "little ice ages" you mention did not go below the 0.5-1 °C global average. Nothing comparable with the last real ice age that went below 8-9 °C.
It should be noted that Arctic Glaciers didn't exist until plate tectonics created a high land dam between the Yucatan Peninsula and South America. This prevented the Pacific Ocean from flowing into the Atlantic Ocean. The Change created new ocean currents around the equator and the earth in general. The Atlantic Ocean currents between the North pole and south pole became colder because the equator had a smaller Black Body Warming. The latest Glacial Maximum was centered over the North Atlantic Ocean, and Eastern America and western Europe were affected the most, as the Arctic Glaciers extended farther towards the equator in those countries. I am getting more discussed with every time I hear global warming as climate change by carbon dioxide increases. Especially when it is called Anthropologic Global Warming or Climate Change. Recently since around 2015 that narrative has been debunked by several scientific studies. The media censorship of these discoveries is horrific. Our American 1st Ammendment is being censored by globalists ideologies in social media. That creates ignorance in the massive global population. Mainstream Media are just Government Propaganda. Social media is mostly globalists censorship. Google AI has become censorship that hides information that go against Mainstream Media narratives. All trace gases combined have very minimal effect on temperature. Water vapor is ignored, but is the major source of Climate Changes. Smal variations of solar radiation on the global oceans causes big changes in atmospheric water vapor. The transition between the latest Glacial Maximum and this Holocene Interglacial epoch was all because of the Milankovich Cycles and the temperature increases were because of the increasing atmospheric water vapor. Carbon Dioxide increased later by outgasing from the increasing oceans surface waters that were expanding by Glaciers melting that held sequestered carbon dioxide. And just like today the increasing carbon dioxide is from outgasing from the Medieval Warming era 500 to 1,000 years ago, that was sequestered by colder temperatures in the Little Ice Age. It is a scientific fact that atmospheric carbon dioxide was far lower around 306ppm of the Dust Bowl of the 1930s, with temperatures compared to today at 420ppm. It is scientifically impossible for the carbon dioxide to have any significant effect on temperature.
The balance will be restored but the process could be detrimental for large portions of Northern Hemisphere Society. But we knew something was brewing and didn't know what to do about it. It turns out, that the best thing to do is let Nature rebalance itself. That does take time and in the process, a lot of weather disruption and food supply disruption could cause a big shift in the human population toward the equatorial zones and also force some reduction of human population too. So, who was really that attached to your life in Massachusetts or Russia anyway? Turns out that we all may be speaking (those that survive) some version of Bahasa or Spanish. Forget studying Russian or Chinese, probably not going to be of much use in 80 to 250 years depending on this or that.
Same song, different dance. We have heard this before. It's about money and control. The planet is flying through space at 26000 miles per hour and there is no steering wheel, no brakes. We are at the mercy of this planet, not the other way.
More gasses are releases as the Earth warms and the ice melts and waters warm - Not the other. way around! Heat up any liquid at all and it releases gasses. Same happens with CO2 O2 Methane, etc.
This is something not mentioned and should be mentioned. Our planet tilt is shifting. Why? Every strong earthquake will shift the axis. Here another, people are pumping ground water out faster than the rains could replenish. Thus the weight seeks to balance itself.
Only very large earthquakes have any significant on the Earth's tilt such as the 9.0 Tohoku quake in 2011 or the Indonesian quake of 2004. And it is the melting of ice from Antarctica and Greenland adding trillions of tonnes of water to the oceans that is causing some tilt in the Earth's axis. Ground water depletion is open for debate as to effect. Nevertheless these two main factors have caused a tiny fraction of a percent change in the Earth's axial tilt.
Your comment made me think how we should get water trade out of Wall Street. Don't know what kind of cruel lunatics allowed that to be a thing. Them selling water, around the world, to the highest bidder is just messed up.
“A 1% increase in atmospheric CO2 would be enough to halt the Gulf Stream”. Thanks for saying this early on. It saved my time watching the rest of the video.
It's rather unclear what is meant by that statement though. If CO2 level in the atmosphere did in fact reach 1% (a 25 times increase over current level) then absolutely it would happen. However, a 1% increase over the current 0.04% (to 0.0404% would not have any major effect on the Gulf stream at all.
@@SaturnusDK By “an increase of 1%”, I do not understand “an increase of 2500%”. Anyway, the latter would not be a plausible event within a geological timescale.
CO2 like any other gases have absolutly no greenhouse effect, because gases do not hold or transfert heat, therefore the effect is insignificant on global climate. Higher global CO2 always comes after a warmer period, not before.
I believe the greatest contributors to ice age is the earth & sun orbit, volcanic activities, asteroid impacts, instead of earth axis tilt, oceanic flow. The sun location with respect to galactic plane could be the key to planetary events.
Hey guys! If you liked the video, we would love for you to share it on social networks like Facebook, Reddit, Instagram, Tik Tok and Twitter.(Since the algorithm is not helping us in terms of views). You will support the Insane Curiosity community to grow and improve more and more our upcoming content. A big thank you!
Do better research
@@EyeoIsis ... You believe there were mistakes ? ...
@@bobbart4198 hey there is one part everyone misses out, the lake in Ireland where geologists discovered an ice age can get into full swing within the time frame of a few months. It really is a much bigger problem than most realise 👍
@@GlitchfaceDan ... My reply to Eyeolsis was just a reaction to HIS (Her ?) comment, he (she ?) opined upon the Video-maker's research - without being specific ... that ALWAYS bugs me ...but Merry Christmas to YOU, just the same ...🤓
@@bobbart4198 sorry I meant to reply to Insane Curiosity lol
some people believing that electric cars are going to stop climate change are unable to charge their cars because the charging stations are frozen. LOL
The whole universe is a volatile place , everyday is a blessing
*Was the Garden of Eden supercharged with atmospheric CO2?*
Fact... All human activity = only 4% of Global CO2 production today.
Volcanoes alone, are dumping more CO2 into the atmosphere in a matter of weeks than humans do in a year.
Fact... Colorless, odorless atmospheric CO2 is the exact opposite of air pollution, and actually stimulates healthy plant and animal growth..
Fact... The 500,000,000 year average for atmospheric CO2 is well over 1,000 ppm.
Fact... During the Age of Dinosaurs, atmospheric CO2 was well over 5,000 ppm.
Since the last Ice Age 12,000 years ago, atmospheric CO2 has doubled to 420 ppm.
. Can you see how far from "normal" CO2 levels we still are today?
. *Stop feeling guilty about human activity creating CO2.*
As long as the trends are towards a warmer climate, we all have to stop being afraid of our naturally changing climate over time, adapt, and enjoy the ride (my opinion).
Who disagrees with any of these facts?... Anyone?
All of these facts are easy to prove true, so, who/what is promoting Global Fear of Climate Change, and why are they doing it?
Answer:... If you have not personally investigated the World Ecinomic Forum Great Reset 2030 Agenda yet, now's the time.
No, we were here millions of years ago and will be again, and when we are, our climate will be exactly the same .
Exactly my thoughts! 👍
amen
The EARTH WILL REGULATE ITSELF...WITH OR WITHOUT US. ALWAYS HAS AND ALWAYS WILL
Its physics. Warming occurs as the system seeks its new equilibrium. Basically; the adding of CO2 to the atmosphere changes the thermal equilibrium point between the planet's climate system and space. "Returning" the system to equilibrium manifests as global warming.
until it doesnt
Yes, but we’d like to not die. I don’t understand why people keep saying this because a full human extinction level threat is terrifying.
@alaxt.6215 😂😂😂😂😂😂 i, you do know the only threat to human extinction from the climate is a full on ice age right?
Do you know that less people are dying from extreme weather events than any time in recent human history?
That more people die from extreme cold weather than extreme warm weather.
That currently the earth is greener and more fertile because of the warmer climate . Every year since the 60s the earth has been getting greener, "except for the few years in the 70s when the planet was cooling"
@@alaxt.6215 people say it because it's true the earth does what it wants to regardless of humans or anything else on the planet
2 things:
1. The warming effect of carbon dioxide varies with it's concentration in the atmosphere but the relationship is not linear, it is exponential. So each increase in carbon dioxide concentration results in less warming than the one before until saturation is attained and further increases make no practical difference.
2 The sun is not just a big lightbulb in the sky. It's output varies in cycles of approximately 11 years. Strictly speaking 11 years is a half cycle as after 11 years the Sun's magnetic poles reverse and technically speaking a solar cycle is approximately 22 years. Most cycles are strong but currently we are heading into grand solar minimum, similar to the Maunder minimum, so in a year or two we might even be able to have frost fairs on the Thames here in the UK. It won't be an ice age as the underlying trend is still to warming and once this cold period is over we should have warming again. However it will reveal that no matter how many more coal-fired power stations are built in places like China (please do your own research, there's info on the web) it's not humans that control the climate.
The carbon issues are are nonsense. The rest in this report seems realistic. The carbon has been much much higher in the past and didn't effect the temperature but did help plants grow.
@@timddog5141 It's the speed of the increase and not the total carbon that matters now.
Spot on.
There are theories that the sun's output is also dependent on it's trajectory around the milky way. When our arm (the Orion arm) of the galaxy passes through gaseous secondary arms, we have a heating period. When it enters into more vacuous space, we have cooling. The theories credit the gas from blocking cosmic rays that inhibit solar output. I prefer to think of it as pouring gas on a fire. The sun's gravity entrains the extra hydrogen into it's fiery furnace.
I think you meant logarithmic. Either way, you are right. As concentrations increase, the effect decreases.
We're still in a ice age, the ice has not left the poles
i dont know, one minute there will be an ice age, then o no methane will make things hotter then we are at the end of an ice age, then methane increase even when after plandemic methane producction deminish, one minute polar ice caps are metling and then supposly acording to artic study they have increase, honestly, i am now convince these is all bs
How do we really know there is ice up there?
@@jonbulau5963 There is no ice up there. Go onto Google earth and street view and there’s a ship up there you can go onto. That will show you there’s no ice there.
@@kikinhugs11 because we have scientists living there XD
The polar caps ought to be there They both North and South polar caps are consider to the Earth's Air Conditioner system Usually it colder in South during the Northern Hemipshere Summers and opposite for Southern Hemipshere The more the degree of the polar caps the hotter the Summer's The lesser degrees during the winter months could also mean colder and wetter Northern Hemisphere.
If I’m driving an EV, recycling plastic, not eating red meat, and not using my A/C, how is there still any global warming? I feel I may have been mislead. Turning the A/C on now, while I through some burgers on the grill.
There is a global warming still because well idk. Look at the factories dude? Or actual data about how much co2 and other gasses humanity produces? Global warming is a GLOBAL issue. One person not using A/C changes nothing. This issue has to be dealt with globally
We are in the extreme age....
Extremely cold
Extremely hot
Extremely wet
Extremely dry
Extremely disappointed Extremely triggered.
Extremely stupid..........
Either way extremely screwed 😕😞😕😞😕😞
And extreme Goverments 😂
Used to be warmer and cooler in the US. www.ncei.noaa.gov/access/monitoring/scec/records
@@lasse3412 And that is the problem, when you start noticing patrons you realize we are the time of extreme goverement
I've held in my hand a fossil from Antarctica. It has a leaf on one side & a fern frond on the other......
About 18 million years old.
I don't mind saying I felt oddly emotional.
We're all here for a good time, not a long time.
I hope the 'good time' starts sometime soon despite the lunacy & panic porn from the so called experts.
Very good video, thanks.
Antarctica was in a different position 18 million years ago.
6:57, False. CO2 like any other gases have absolutly no greenhouse effect, because gases do not hold or transfert heat, therefore the effect is insignificant on global climate.
Higher global CO2 always comes after a warmer period, not before.
😂😂😂
Did you read this in the bible?
@@MrPAULONEAL no, NASA. do your owb researxh instead of blindly following a leftist agenda.
Well said. People don’t understand the incredible amount of variables involved.
Lot of variables involved. Simple experiment, can you tie up your thumb and lift a pan or glass - no. Can you tie up your leg and try to run a 100 meter sprint - no? So how are we destroying components after components of the earth and expect everything to run normally.. It won't! The earth is a huge engine. Its alive. Its keeping us alive. Plants just don't grow in their own, life just doesn't appear on its own. People have to understand this quickly and stop damaging our climate further. Its already too late, however let's not pose this small window of opportunity.
I see. If the planet warms, it's because of us. If it cools, it's because of us. Got it.
Depends on the trigger.
Its the Earth and Sun relationship that causes all climate change
Either way blame Brexit.
@@patrickball2493Apart from earth getting hit with decreasing amounts of solar energy, but still warming.
Of course! Ever since we figured out how to increase our understanding of the world around us, we have begun to question the existence of God, until we realized, we ARE God. Very convenient.
Very good, except it is the Ice Age we are still in is punctuated by short interglacial warm periods. The current period peaked with the Holocene Climate Optimum (for humans) ~8500 years ago, with temperatures trending colder since. The four latest warm periods' temperatures over time have followed very similar trajectories. By that measure, Earth's temp has peaked, and is trending back to the normal, long glacial periods typical of the last 800,000 years, with ~5000 years to go. Not mentioned in your video is the absolute solar output of the Sun and the effects of catastrophic extraterrestrial impacts. Look for by name, Younger Dryas Extinction.
To sum it up, the Earth goes through normal glacial periods of 80 to 130 thousand years, interrupted by interglacial periods of 8 to 33 thousand years. CO2 effect is currently saturated, with less and less effect with further increases. Paying wealthy overlords will not stop Nature's cycles.
Impacts are probably unimportant compared to Volcanoes,the event of 536 likely killed 20% of the animal life on Earth.
yes is true
Agreed
Current global temperature is much warmer now than it was 8,000 years ago during the Holocene Climate Optimum. Global temperature was on a long gradual drop since 8,000 years ago, sliding into a new glacial period, but it suddenly reversed in the late 1970s and has been rocketing higher since then.
@@johncoviello8570 if you don’t know real history ,and you don’t realise that the level of lies and corrupted data currently being spouted as real is a pack of lies, then you are in a very small minority here and ignorant of the reality that AGW is the greatest fraud ever perpetrated.
Milankovitch Cycles factor in. 25,000 year-old Oak trees are being milled after being found in wet gravel dozens of feet down in the ground.
the first sentence of this video is factually incorrect. the Earth is in an inter-glacial period during a current Ace Age. why in the world cant these people get their facts straight?
Why is it, that articles like this one ALWAYS mix - and mix up - the use of "X number of years ago, and X number of years bce" ??
They reference a source that states something happened 8,000 years bce, and state it as 8,000 years ago. Or vica- versa. It happened 10,000 years ago, and they insert bca.
Each time that happens, it introduces a 2,000 year inaccuracy in the narrative.
Very confusing. Totally messes up the chronology of events. Please check your dates.
Great summary on lots of factors about climate variations. Thanks
Oh man as an australian i would kill to see some snow for the first time.
Come to United States bro
Lol.
Yes we are on the verge of some sudden changes that will soon send us to an “icier “ ice age.
Perhaps on a geologic time scale we are on the "verge" of colder temperatures, but that is still many hundreds if not thousands of years in the future. The Milankovitch cycles are not going to realign for a few thousand more years. And besides CO2 levels are already 50% higher then prior to every past glacial period during the Pleistocene epoch. And that will delay any near potential term cooling like the little Ice Age.
Your right 20 to 30 years max
The sheep are being spoon feed BS study physics
“Precipitation could dilute the Gulf Stream” But doesn’t all that rain come from the ocean in the first place?
Milutin Milankovic was Serbian mathematician. Siberia is region in Russia and Serbia is country in Europe
Serbia is in Universum, not in Europa. Greatings from Serbia.
Coolest winter in Hawaii in many years so far.
And warmest winter in Poland in many years so far. These are the anomalies that happen during global warming which is proved worldwide
Engineer and Scientist here. I am working on developing contingency systems. This is really going to happen. At the rate at which were burning fossil fuels, global warming has accelerated, heating up the atmosphere and oceans. This has caused glaciers to melt at an unprecedented rate. This affects the salinity of the water changing the physical and chemical properties of water creating changes in ocean currents. The AMOC current has already slowed down drastically. Not only that there's a sharp increase in the number of volcanic eruptions and earthquakes across the world. Moreover we're already seeing a lot of cyclones, hurricanes, tornadoes, incessant rains, floods, glacier bursts, cloud bursts. All indicating that there is a huge climate shift. Have to be ready for this one.
Thank you for your insight!
There is no such thing as "fossil fuel", oil is a abiotic by-product of the earth's crust magma activity and is produced in perpetuity.
Sorry but there hasn't been any increase in frequency or severity in either anti-cyclones or cyclones. That is very widely documented it only in the media space that that claim exists. No Carbon dioxide increase isn't statistically significant to earth temperature and carbon dioxide as a percentage of the atmosphere lags temperature warming indicating there another more significant force at play. This video makes absolutely no mention of the earth magnetic field decline which has been significant and we are due for polar reverse probably within the next 50 years. Earth field strength determines charge particle interaction in the upper atmosphere and the rate of destruction of ozone. It is just silly to focus on the limited and minor effect of carbon dioxide. Glaciers have been further north by 100km between 8000 to 6500 years ago when carbon dioxide level where hovering at 200ppm and temperatures where globally warmer by 0.9 degrees than today. So no carbon dioxide isn't the key but other earth science is!!
I have already found the information on this video. I am overjoyed to see that someone agrees with my findings ❤❤❤❤🎉🎉😂😊
I was exposed to 'the axial-rotation' in my early-education in school in Kingston, Jamaica in the 50s before emigrating North and never heard of anything like it until now .. !
I was watching this until those annoying intrusive adds interrupted my viewing so I only watch up to the adds now and make sure what ever is being advertised I will avoid like the plague...
You could take a nap, instead...DUH...So don't watch..Who cares.🙃
We have been in an Ice Age for 2.8 million years. We are in a glacial minimum.
My dad said that way long ago
The Northern Hemisphere entered a Glacial Age 2.8MY. The Southern Hemisphere entered a Glacial Age around 35MY. While the Milankovich Cycles play a major role. Plate Tectonics is an even bigger factor. The creation of the Ismuths of Panama due to tectonic activity blocked the transfer of warm water from the Pacific to the Atlantic. This resulted in less warm water penetrating into the higher latitudes of the Atlantic. The separation of South America from Antarctica allowed for the creation of the Circumpolar Current.
11:15
"Next time on Insane Curiosity we'll learn the difference between Serbia and Siberia" 😂
... THAT'S true !
It would have helped if at the first sentence they didn't confuse 'ice age' with 'glaciation'. The last glaciation ended about 12, 000 years ago. We are still in an Ice Age that began about 2.6 million years ago.
For 74 years I've heard. Ice age, heating up, ice age, heating up. This planet is made to take care of it's self. So it's all a bunch of bla bla bla bla bla! We've got way more than this to worry about.
Except the so called "ice age" shit is bullshit. No real scientist really think that we are heading to the ice age. Listen to real science instead of building your knowledge on shitty clickbait wideo on youtube
London, and the south of England, experienced heavy snow as recently as the 13th century or so. Where was the Gulf Stream then?
It was there. We know from proxy records that it must have been there. A bit of snow occasionally doesn't change this.
@@Talkathon408 When I lived in southern England (specifically Winchester) the normal temperature range was 30deg F to 85deg F. In the years I was there we had a couple of snow events, one to two inches lasting a few days.
In the period I was talking about in my original comment, the snow was deep and lasted the winter.
So, if the Gulf Stream was there then (I fully agree it was), then how do you explain the conditions? What I was really trying to convey was that if the Gulf Stream is altered, it is not the end of the world. Just look across the North Sea at Norway.
Finally, my comment on the Gulf Stream was meant to be ironic. Sorry, that did not come across.
@@louisgiokas2206 It may have slowed down a bit but I think scientists think that the last time thermohaline circulation shutdown in the North Atlantic was during the Younger Dryas stadial and the conditions were almost glacial then and lasted about 1000 years. As in the ice sheets expanded, maybe as far as southern Norway... So things could potentially get pretty bad if it happened again.
Actually Louis, I forgot to mention that global temperature did stabalise for a few decades after ww2 due to burning of coal and the presence of aerosols in the upper atmosphere, so that may explain cooler winters in southern England around the time. As an aside I happen to live close to Winchester and have done for the past 25 years.
@@Talkathon408 Oh, what town? I really loved the area. I learned fly fishing in Stockbridge. I had an Alfa Romeo GTV and loved tooling around the area with my sons, who could fit in the back seats at the time. I was even elected to the Board of Governors of the primary school my sons attended. It was a wonderful experience. I could go on, as I am wont to do.
Of course, if the ice sheets expand in the way they did before, that is the end of global warming, isn't it? If they get that big, then it should also mean the end of sea level rise as well.
You mention the time after WWII. Interestingly, the clearing of the air in the US through strict emission controls has been speculated as a source of the warming locally. On the other hand, in China today the air is massively polluted. Now they seem to be having winter weather, including heavy snow, a bit earlier than usual. Maybe a connection?
The Little Ice age created winters with Ice on the Thames up to 2 feet thick,they had Ice Fairs until 1812. It occurred because the Sun went to sleep from 1645 to 1725.
In Australia, which is the oldest continent on earth, I have studied different rock formations all over the to make sense of what I have found, I studied everything I could find to explain and corroborate my observations. It is very obvious to see from geological observations that the information on this video is absolutely correct. However there is more to be said. I love you people ❤️ 🎉❤🎉😊
Australia is not a continent
@@UnknownMoses Yes it is .
Crack the tubes Bruce.
Mile high glaciers. Yeti monsters. Frozen snot-icicles. The more scary environment imaginable.
🌪
🌍🌌 I also have some problems with "sudden stratospheric warming".
🔄 Big events like "Ingunn" moved air from the the tropics towards the polar see, 🌎🏖↗☃ heating the stratosphere through the accelerated polar vortex, a convective system.
The oceanic currents can´t stop before the Earth´s rotation ends.
Both is caused by balancing the gyroscope´s centrifugal force (accelerating masses closer to the poles towards the equator 🛖↙🍙) and centripetal gravitation, both modulated by centripetal force, bold relief or coastlines. Heating and cooling (or salt) induce some densitity changes, affecting the height or depth of molecules´ movement.
Centrifugal force would prefere 🪐, spherical gravitation 🌐, a perfect rounded (atmo)sphere.
If climate models ignore that fundamental forces, they must produce data garbage.
Ih no! An ice age?!? Better raise the carbon taxes again!
so do you think we should increase the carbon tax to straighten things out?
Ha Ha Ha 🤣
Even in an ice age, we’d still have to go to work.
Thanks for the comment!
Could the Tonga volcano that put untold billions of tons of water in the atmosphere cause a cooling by evaporation event?
If it put billions of tons of particulates into the atmosphere, then there would be cooling due to making the atmosphere opaque. But seeing as it was almost entirely water, then it will have a warming effect (water vapour is the dominant greenhouse gas in the atmosphere) until it has fallen out again. (which it has been doing with abundance here in Australia since it erupted).
Water vapour is a potent greenhouse gas when in the stratosphere. When the eruption injected water vapour into that level, the greenhouse warming addition effectively ate up our remaining carbon budget in one day.
Shade or evaporation loss was vastly eclipsed by the addition of heat trapping moisture in the upper atmosphere.
@@danwatson171 Technically, to be semantically and scientifically correct, there is no such thing as a greenhouse gas in the earth's atmosphere because the earth is not an enclosed greenhouse with a glass enclosure in the stratosphere. CO2 is added to plant greenhouses up to like 1000 ppm (0.10 %)(normal is 400 ppm or 0.04+ %) to speed up plant growth since, the more CO2 inside, the more photosynthesis occurs more quickly making plants grow faster. (CO2 is absolutely a critical trace gas essential to almost all life on earth, plant and animal.) Heat is separately added using natural gas or propane heaters to make the greenhouse warmer and also increase the plant growth rate. The glass holds this added heat in longer before it escapes/conducts to the cooler outside through the glass. Heat and energy in warmer objects always goes to cold or colder objects. This is the Second law of Thermodynamics. There are no exceptions in our environment.
The analogy of a " greenhouse gas "in earth's atmosphere and that earth is a greenhouse is totally false and a very misunderstood and misleading analogy of the actual original physical plant greenhouse and how it works and the added CO2 gas purpose. This false analogy has fooled billions of people either through innocent misunderstandings of physics, heat transfer other sciences, or outright dishonesty by some. Gases or any objects can not and do not trap heat. Heat or energy can not be permanently trapped. It goes or moves by conduction, convection or radiation to cold or cooler objects. It's just a matter of time with a delay. Weather is a heat transfer mechanism. Water vapor has a very high latent heat capacity that is a huge key to the weather on earth. CO2 (400+ ppm or 0.04%) is basically almost irrelevant compared to warm water vapor, typically 1% to 4 %, which rises in the earth's atmosphere carrying the latent heat by convection where it cools/condenses releasing latent heat forming clouds and radiating heat into space (4 degrees Kelvin). Gases also transfer energy among themselves kinetically by molecular collisions. Nitrogen is 78% and Oxygen 21% of the air. Argon is 0.9+ % and CO2 is 0.04+%. Water vapor is nor typically included in the total % because it varies so widely. Hurricanes, typhoons, thunderstorms wind, etc. are massive heat transfer mechanisms that cool the atmosphere and move heat energy up to the stratosphere where it is radiated into space. Warmer to colder. The First Law of Thermodynamics is energy can not be created or destroyed. The energy or heat added to earth leaves earth (basically with a delay). The earth basically is in balance and self regulates its overall temperature over time. This is a simplification to try to explain in somewhat plainer language how things really work. Weather and climate are insanely complicated and are not really understood as a science as should be obvious to any thoughtful person. My apologies to all as I am not trying to insult or belittle anyone here. To some, I hope this helps to provide a somewhat larger macro picture and is not so deep in the weeds that it is incomprehensible.
Changes we are seeing in the atmosphere caused by Tonga are highly likely short term, as that eruption might raise the risk that at least one year in the next five will temporarily exceed the 1.5C warming threshold. Climate trends take at least 30 years to show. It will take an eruption more powerful than Tonga’s to affect a climate trend, a volcanic eruption bigger than any in human history. Basically an event like Tonga in the long run will work out to zero as a climate forcing over the long-term considering the prediction from main stream climate science is a possibility of only a temporary increase in temp for a short period.
If the Tonga eruption does push the global mean temp up globally temporarily; still insignificant in regard to long-term climate trend, but not for the stratosphere, as it has created a wide range of potential long-lasting repercussions for its global composition and dynamics. A much bigger concern is how its chemistry affects ozone variations causing an impact on sea ice and sea surface temperature.
Don't know if I can wait that long for the ice age to come
Thanks for sharing your thoughts!
Why is there oil deep in the ocean if it only comes from dead plants and animals? Is it because the crust is always moving and the oil deposits were at at some point dry land?
Oil isn't a fossil anything, and it doesn't come from plants or animals. Saturn's moon Titan has hundreds of times more liquid hydrocarbons than all the known oil and natural gas reserves on Earth, according to new data from NASA's Cassini spacecraft. And there is no life on Titan.
Oh well! There goes the EVs! They'll just become another part of the glaciation! Obviously, science and politics are at odds with each other!
Because science has been politically corrected by the left.
Well I for one am going to follow my parents advice and close the refrigerator door. Every little bit helps.
You do realize that your fridge emits more heat than cold, even if you took off the doors.
@@tixximmi1 what ! Preposterous, I say preposterous.
@@Helm-w1q Then spoil your gouda, I don't care.
It will take 90 000 years to get to its peak.
Then 10 000 years to get out of it.
I have heard this before in 1978
And it was wrong them and it's wrong now. The earth isn't going into another ice age for thousands of years.
What effect does the magnetic pole drifting around have on the global temperature?
Great question! The magnetic pole drifting doesn't directly affect global temperatures. The poles move slowly over time due to changes in Earth's core, but it's the climate factors like greenhouse gases and ocean currents that really influence temperature. However, the pole shift does affect things like navigation and Earth's magnetic field, which plays a role in protecting us from solar radiation.
We're just one Mt Tambora away from global cooling!
The problem editor. To start with is by the
Time earths in a ice age the cycle will be starting over with one single cell organism at a time like it did billons of years ago because all himans and life on Earth won't survive the extreme heat and extreme conditions on earth we will face first
Here in Norway the nature are full aof scars after the Ice Ages.
if the world has not dealt with pollution like we can do you say that the world will never go into another ice age
Humans have very little impact on the climate
I got 90 seconds in, when atmospheric CO2 was mentioned. Goodbye!
Well, you missed quite a lot then, didn't you Einstein.
@@rossr100 Goodbye!
*Was the Garden of Eden supercharged with atmospheric CO2?*
Fact... All human activity = only 4% of Global CO2 production today.
Volcanoes alone, are dumping more CO2 into the atmosphere in a matter of weeks than humans do in a year.
Fact... Colorless, odorless atmospheric CO2 is the exact opposite of air pollution, and actually stimulates healthy plant and animal growth..
Fact... The 500,000,000 year average for atmospheric CO2 is well over 1,000 ppm.
Fact... During the Age of Dinosaurs, atmospheric CO2 was well over 5,000 ppm.
Since the last Ice Age 12,000 years ago, atmospheric CO2 has doubled to 420 ppm.
. Can you see how far from "normal" CO2 levels we still are today?
. *Stop feeling guilty about human activity creating CO2.*
As long as the trends are towards a warmer climate, we all have to stop being afraid of our naturally changing climate over time, adapt, and enjoy the ride (my opinion).
Who disagrees with any of these facts?... Anyone?
All of these facts are easy to prove true, so, who/what is promoting Global Fear of Climate Change, and why are they doing it?
Answer:... If you have not personally investigated the World Ecinomic Forum Great Reset 2030 Agenda yet, now's the time.
Historically for the last 4½ billion years ice ages have been cyclical, ever since the moon collision began with the snowball earth.
Should we inverse the carbon tax and get paied to release more CO2 now?
If this is at all right, it will not be tomorrow. When?? In 500 years? 1000 years? 5 000 years? What??
The entire Galaxy is moving, so we have never been where we are now. Humans want to see patterns, but there really is no pattern to climate or ice ages. The only constant in the universe is change.
Exactly. We ain't seen nothing yet. There are patterns, but we have not been around long enough to perceive the larger ones. Homo Sapiens is around 20,000 years old. It takes around 250 million years for the sun to orbit the galaxy. We have only experienced an infinitesimally small fraction of what's out there.
@@hartshepherd5060 You are speaking bullshit now. We have studied past. We know that we altered existing cycles and that will harm us pretty bad. "When scientists focus on climate from before the past 100-150 years, they use records from physical, chemical, and biological materials preserved within the geologic record. The Earth holds climate clues dating back over three billion years, contained in rock layers, polar ice sheets, lake beds, and more". Stop speaking bullshit and ask why billionaires are polluting earth destroying our future.
Sun orbits galaxy in 250 million years. We have data dating back over three billion years.
1:20 an annual increase of 1% which would bring its level up to what 0.045%?
I don't think so because the Great Lakes long ago emptied into the Mississippi River and eventually the Gulf of Mexico which would have done a lot more to disrupt the ocean conveyor circulation then an annual increase of 1% of CO2
I noticed this phenomenon while looking at the raw data from a global warming article in Scientific American around 1986 or so. I'm glad someone else noticed.
We have had 5 major global earth cooling events in the last 2000 years. These were Major volcano eruptions.
I will just wait until the scientists are baffled again. 😂
Hoffentlich wird es bald wärmer, dann wächst die Natur besser, es gibt mehr zu essen und meine Gelenke tun nicht mehr weh 🙏🤣
Except in the places where it is already warm.
the artic is a desert.no rain.until the artic ice goes away there is no snow builtup on land
This video uses a click bait title to draw people in, but in the latter part of the video states that it is uncertain when the next ice age will occur.
This video also claims that given past climate conditions it is understanable to question the current accepted causes of global warming. This is a false statement because for one we know that the current warming is due to an increase in GHG and recently due to the decrease in sulphur dioxide emissions from ocean going vessels as mandated by stronger clear air standards. And sure there is some natural variablility that could lead to some of the current warmin, but that is secondary to the impact of the first two factors.
Michael Mann's "hockey stick" makes its appearance. Given that the weight of the ice has depressed Antarctica about 2000 feet, how is Antarctica going to be able to drift off of south pole? Regarding the snowball earth, also consider that the sun was not as bright then as it is today. The sun will get brighter as it ages towards its end of life on the main sequence.
That "hockey stick" was made from two different data. That level one was measured data and the fast rising end was modelled, and that is very big nono in science.
But it was the great beginning to money flow from us to them, so why any scientist would refuse money?
Just follow the money and you find the truth.
@@ollirantala
The original hockey stick chart is irrelevant, as others exploring the same question with better statistical methods, more evidence, and higher resolution that did it much it better than Bradley, Mann, and Hughes, corroborated the finding instead. That's why MBH1998 is superseded. When it's been done better and better with the same result, the original is historic but not important as the science develops. The irony is funding from the Koch Brothers and the oil industry hired a team to bust it and came up with the same results to their chagrin. Every reconstruction of historical temperature published since the original has ended up being some form of hockey stick shape.
People don't take into consideration or realize what a volatile place this planet really is with all this water and the magnetic poles flipping around constantly every 12 1/2 thousand years.... It may appear Serene at first glance from up there but it's actually quite a dangerous place!
There is no reason to expect the forcings of solar irradiance and Milankovitch cyclles, which are in a cooling phase, can overcome anthropogenic greenhouse gases. The last glaciation of the Pleistocene will be the last until CO2 goes back down, if ever.
If earth has Global warming and Global freezing at the same time will we be saved .😮 I can't take it anymore, I'm going back to my cave in the mountains. 3/13/24
Technically we are still in a ice age. The glaciers have retreated. It will take centuries for the glacial maximum to occur. It took the Laurentide ice sheet to formed over much North America Centuries to cover the northern half of the continent. We will be long gone before major glaciation occurs.
CO2 is NOT a greenhouse gas and a 1% rise in CO2 levels is only 4 ppm which is almost nothing compared to the much higher levels in the past ! Actually the nowadays CO2 levels are at historical lows !
Thank you for your comment. CO2 is a greenhouse gas, and even small increases can significantly impact our climate. While CO2 levels have been higher in the past, the current rapid increase is concerning because it disrupts the balance that supports our modern climate.
Let It Snow!!!
BRAAAP!!!
I LOVE all these theories on u tube. So much of science is theory which means we know little but are good story tellers.
So the warming due to El nino has cool counterpart during short day months? What will be the effects of Frigid Himalayan peaks to Indochina region and Phil and Indonesia in case new ice age repeats?
WHAT ABOUT SNOWBALL EARTH...1 GIANT ICE BALL ??
It is unlikely we go through another ice age anytime soon. The "little ice ages" you mention did not go below the 0.5-1 °C global average. Nothing comparable with the last real ice age that went below 8-9 °C.
It should be noted that Arctic Glaciers didn't exist until plate tectonics created a high land dam between the Yucatan Peninsula and South America. This prevented the Pacific Ocean from flowing into the Atlantic Ocean. The Change created new ocean currents around the equator and the earth in general. The Atlantic Ocean currents between the North pole and south pole became colder because the equator had a smaller Black Body Warming. The latest Glacial Maximum was centered over the North Atlantic Ocean, and Eastern America and western Europe were affected the most, as the Arctic Glaciers extended farther towards the equator in those countries.
I am getting more discussed with every time I hear global warming as climate change by carbon dioxide increases. Especially when it is called Anthropologic Global Warming or Climate Change. Recently since around 2015 that narrative has been debunked by several scientific studies. The media censorship of these discoveries is horrific. Our American 1st Ammendment is being censored by globalists ideologies in social media. That creates ignorance in the massive global population. Mainstream Media are just Government Propaganda. Social media is mostly globalists censorship. Google AI has become censorship that hides information that go against Mainstream Media narratives.
All trace gases combined have very minimal effect on temperature. Water vapor is ignored, but is the major source of Climate Changes. Smal variations of solar radiation on the global oceans causes big changes in atmospheric water vapor. The transition between the latest Glacial Maximum and this Holocene Interglacial epoch was all because of the Milankovich Cycles and the temperature increases were because of the increasing atmospheric water vapor. Carbon Dioxide increased later by outgasing from the increasing oceans surface waters that were expanding by Glaciers melting that held sequestered carbon dioxide. And just like today the increasing carbon dioxide is from outgasing from the Medieval Warming era 500 to 1,000 years ago, that was sequestered by colder temperatures in the Little Ice Age. It is a scientific fact that atmospheric carbon dioxide was far lower around 306ppm of the Dust Bowl of the 1930s, with temperatures compared to today at 420ppm. It is scientifically impossible for the carbon dioxide to have any significant effect on temperature.
The greenhouse effect is known for over 150 years and not been disproven once.
The temperatures rise as calculated 40 years ago.
if a frog had wings it would not bump it's ass when it lands.
The balance will be restored but the process could be detrimental for large portions of Northern Hemisphere Society. But we knew something was brewing and didn't know what to do about it.
It turns out, that the best thing to do is let Nature rebalance itself. That does take time and in the process, a lot of weather disruption and food supply disruption could cause a big shift in the human population toward the equatorial zones and also force some reduction of human population too. So, who was really that attached to your life in Massachusetts or Russia anyway?
Turns out that we all may be speaking (those that survive) some version of Bahasa or Spanish. Forget studying Russian or Chinese, probably not going to be of much use in 80 to 250 years depending on this or that.
Yes, I really worry about what language I am speaking in 80 years...
Cool everybody needs to chillout👽
Actually i believe it's 22.1 not 22.5 at the minimal obliquity.
Farmers Can’t Work in Extreme Heat and Humidity
Theres always been ice at both poles of Earth in any true history I know of.. We're still in the ice age..
Milankovic is right. Nothing to do with greenhouse gasses.
Same song, different dance. We have heard this before. It's about money and control. The planet is flying through space at 26000 miles per hour and there is no steering wheel, no brakes. We are at the mercy of this planet, not the other way.
More gasses are releases as the Earth warms and the ice melts and waters warm - Not the other. way around! Heat up any liquid at all and it releases gasses. Same happens with CO2 O2 Methane, etc.
There’s a new one coming. I have seen it twice in a vision. No one goes unscathed.
It’s the circle of life on Planet Earth and not a damned thing humans can do about it … 🤷🏻♂️
The problem is not death.
The major majority will be gone by then. Maybe a few stragglers.
Plate tectonics and ocean currents dictate whether or not we will have glaciers inside of the milankovich cycles.
They can certainly play a role, but do not matter from a certain amount of greenhousegas on.
Summer was so cold last year 2023 in dumb Ohio
And what is round on both ends and high in the middle?
So this will be the 6th Ice age.
We are in an ice age.
@@old-pete Not not listening to the Media, it’s Global Warming, or are you like me, referencing the PaleoClimate Data.
@@winstonsmith935I am listening to science. Science clearly states that we are in an ice age.
This is something not mentioned and should be mentioned. Our planet tilt is shifting. Why? Every strong earthquake will shift the axis. Here another, people are pumping ground water out faster than the rains could replenish. Thus the weight seeks to balance itself.
Only very large earthquakes have any significant on the Earth's tilt such as the 9.0 Tohoku quake in 2011 or the Indonesian quake of 2004. And it is the melting of ice from Antarctica and Greenland adding trillions of tonnes of water to the oceans that is causing some tilt in the Earth's axis. Ground water depletion is open for debate as to effect. Nevertheless these two main factors have caused a tiny fraction of a percent change in the Earth's axial tilt.
Your comment made me think how we should get water trade out of Wall Street. Don't know what kind of cruel lunatics allowed that to be a thing. Them selling water, around the world, to the highest bidder is just messed up.
You didn’t mention the Malonkovich cycles
“A 1% increase in atmospheric CO2 would be enough to halt the Gulf Stream”. Thanks for saying this early on. It saved my time watching the rest of the video.
It's rather unclear what is meant by that statement though. If CO2 level in the atmosphere did in fact reach 1% (a 25 times increase over current level) then absolutely it would happen. However, a 1% increase over the current 0.04% (to 0.0404% would not have any major effect on the Gulf stream at all.
@@SaturnusDK By “an increase of 1%”, I do not understand “an increase of 2500%”. Anyway, the latter would not be a plausible event within a geological timescale.
CO2 like any other gases have absolutly no greenhouse effect, because gases do not hold or transfert heat, therefore the effect is insignificant on global climate.
Higher global CO2 always comes after a warmer period, not before.
@@philippecardin1109Physics disagree.
@@philippecardin1109 Actually water vapor transfers heat with its latent heat capacity to the upper atmosphere where it is radiated into space.
Can't handle the sing-songy voice.
40 degrees is better than 0.
Summer is better than winter.
Winter is necessary for earths water system. The mountain ranges get feet of snow and in the spring replenish the many streams and rivers.
I believe the greatest contributors to ice age is the earth & sun orbit, volcanic activities, asteroid impacts, instead of earth axis tilt, oceanic flow. The sun location with respect to galactic plane could be the key to planetary events.
Interesting points!
Ice age is earths cycle of healing it's self,the timing is eradicated.leave it alone is the best policy.
We have, at best, the “latest working theory”
Awesome video. Finally a channel that doesn't swallow the "seas are gonna rise and kill us all" climate alarmist pill.
Ice Age hasnt ended yet. What is this video talking about.
Nope...The earth is in the longest most habitable stage EVER.
@@matildagreene1744
By definition we live ice age now, because both poles have ice.
Most habitable stage is best without ice.
It's not there yet. We are just pieces of a big giant natural play game.
no mention of the weakening magnetic shield of earth or the magnetic pole migration. thumbs down.