When I first turned toward YHWH, I mistakenly thought I was a Christian, since I had been raised in Christianity. But like Keith testified, I started intensely studying the Word. When I went to my Christian Church sharing what I learned, so excited to be part of a family of Believers, they either chastised me for what I learned from the Scriptures, or had no clue what the Scripture actually said. I was so miserable until I put off all the Christian indoctrination, and read the Scriptures with an open mind. It was then that I realized that from the beginning YHWH was building a Family of His own called Israel, and as Paul clearly states over and over, all those who turn to the Hebrew Messiah are adopted into the Christian family, no, no, no, they are adopted into, grafted into the Family Tree of Abraham, making them Hebrews, and as Moses wrote, adopted into the Family of Israel through Ephraim. And although my new found Family is spread out over the World, I know I will be united with them soon, and my Father and Brother are with me always.
Thank you Keith and Nehemia for opening our understanding of how to rightfully divide the word. It takes commitment and dedication doing this type of study. May Elohim Bless you both from SA.
The world is falling apart. People NEED conversations like this, with depth. We need it. Please dont stop, even though its awkward for you at times Nehemia, I'm sure.
To be honest, this is the only way I want to study the gospels. It's My first time studying the gospels and I'm enjoying everything of it. I couldn't ask for a better teacher, Thank you Nehemia
You two are just outstanding and I thank God for bring you both together. Wonderful conversation! Thank you both! Wish I had hundreds of thousands of dollars to give to you both!
I really love listening to you and lean, Praise Yahova that has opened my eyes to many things. I have tried to sign up to both of your website many times with two different emails and I haven't been Abel to do so.
It’s written in Daniel to close up the book. As the books are being opened keep in mind that these guys are taking us deeper into the mysteries that are revealed below the surface. May God bless both of you abundantly. Thank you
Thank you for this amazing episode!! And also, I really, really appreciated the little caption rectangles below that clarified things like which exact verses were being talked about or what exactly the book title was ... so super helpful for me as a listener! But I also know that stuff like that takes a whole extra pile of time and effort on your part, so THANK YOU! And it was very useful and noticed! Shalom! May Yehovah continue to bless your paths!
Leí todos los comentarios, y hasta el 5 de Julio de 2020, no había un comentario en castellano; así, que por ser un poco "rebelde" a pesar que sé inglés, lo haré en castellano... ¡Es genial aprender con ustedes dos! y... cada día salen cosas que "sabía" y llegan nuevos conocimientos... Yehovah los continue bendiciendo para que puedan hacer este trabajo tan maravilloso que han hecho... Bendiciones Nehemia y Keith
Keith and Nehemia - Thank you for your efforts on this endeavor as we all are seeking Truth. Here is something to consider. What are these passages NOT saying? Did it say "Mary has been found in adultery" or "The child that you will bare will be a bastard" ? And what if we do as Nehemia wisely stated by reading Luke in conjunction with Matthew. Did it say "Mary, you are a harlot and deserve stoning" or "the child you will conceive (future tense) will be marked and will roam in the wilderness eating grass like an animal" Nope! it did not say that! In fact, and this is what I love about the Luke account, Mary had to agree to it! (Luke 1:38) She came into alignment with YHVH's plan for redemption! Thanks again! Keep Reading, Keep Searching!
Yes, we do get that from Luke - Ruach Ha Qodesh (the Holy Spirit) was the instrument by which Miriam was impregnated. This landmark study is a real blessing, and I Thank YeHoVaH for you both! Keith, at 43-45 minutes that's a real Pearl - and a connection I never saw before this study.
I like the reference to the "benefit of the doubt" aspect in connection with Joseph's attested righteousness. The Mosaic Law had built in a discretion of grace or differently put, It seems that a hurt party could choose NOT to bring charges after all, which implied their righteousness due to the gracious attitude towards the offender and by giving them the benefit of the doubt. Case in point: "13 “IF any man takes a wife and goes in to her and then hates her 14 and accuses her of misconduct and brings a bad name upon her, saying, ‘I took this woman, and when I came near her, I did not find in her evidence of virginity,’ 15 THEN ..." (Deut 22:13ff; emphasis mine).The case law wording IF ... THEN includes here: IF he thinks she cheated on him during the betrothal period AND he choses to ACCUSE her, THEN the prescribed investigation has to follow. So, even the Mosaic Law does not seem to oblige the hurt party to press charges. Not to do so then is an expression of righteousness and graciousness. Joseph exemplified it.
I have listened to all of the hebrew gospel pearls and as an atheist Judaism is old Christianity or Christianity is the new Judaism ✡ ✝️ they are only really discussing semantics i love it
And I see it just the opposite, Nehemia talks so fast and so much, Keith has to interrupt in order to get a word in. Several times Keith had to get Nehemia to slow down so they would not Passover important parts of Scripture.
@@thruthelensofscripture4919 Nehemia is autistic and it is a miracle of God that he does so well. As for me, I am well familiar with Scripture and when Nehemia mentions one I immediately know what he is talking about, so his excited talk is rather joyful to me. However, the two do play off of each other well.
@@davidbrogan606 I'm guessing when you say Scriptures you mean the Hebrew Scriptures. Like many others, I am searching for the Gospels, or any of the Books or Letters the Christians called the New Testament that were originally written in Hebrew, then translated into English. It is so hard because almost everything is translated from Greek to Hebrew to English, which makes no sense.
@@thruthelensofscripture4919 It is far from universally accepted that the Gospels were penned in Hebrew. But Matthew has a good amount of proof that it was originally written in Hebrew. Nehemia and Michael Rood both have videos that go deeply into it. When I say Scripture, I mean all the Bible from Genesis to Revelation.
Shabat shalom Guys😊. Wow, wow, wow. Thank you, thank you, thank you Keith, thank you, thank you, thank you Nehemia. I love it, I love it, I love it 🥰. Ok my simple intake, since Yeshua's birth has been prophesied from long ago, Yehovah knew just how HE was going to do it (n confuse us at the same time) n when. After all it was through Adam n Chavah that death came... In both Luke n Matthew, that I can understand, Miriam is 'engaged' to Yosef, n Miriam was with child by the Holy Spirit n power....... Remembering GOD is still in charge here. Keith, I will say the instrument. She already knows, she accepts.
There is an obvious parallel between the Creation when the Spirit Of God moved upon the face of the waters and the Spirit overshadowing Mariam unto pregnancy.
At the 34:12 mark when you're talking about the Anglican priest - PLEASE PLEASE make this a RUclips short! "We don't believe in silly things" and your reasoning after that, it's a Gospel pearl
Being alive in every single minute occurred, feeding the invisible soul, guided with mighty hand of the real King of the whole universe. This can be counted as more than a price of the earth! Great prices are awaiting for you all, and be the "Strong Wings" of "YeHoYaH" protected you until the end of this battle!
The Spit it of Truth is truly a leader and counselor leading as a lamp unto our feet for wisdom understanding and a opening mind. Right on fellows. ( I must add I think rood has gone off the deep end over his head somewhere)
Nehemiah, Keith, good stuff. I wanted to point out that the Catholic teaching on Mary is that she is the new ARK. Many commentators have noted that the language of the annunciation is Tabernacle language. Luke records, "And the angel answered her, “The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you; therefore the child to be born will be called holy-the Son of God." So here not only do we see the notion of עבר, but you also have the Tabernacle notion of the shechinah casting a shadow over the mercy seat. And while the old Ark contained the manna and the stone tablets, Mary the new Ark will carry the word made flesh, the Bread of Life come down from heaven.
Where is the video on ch1 verse 21? Yall did video on ch 1:1-17 then ch1:18 only and then jumped to ch2. Did I miss something? Yall talked about virgin birth but no naming YESHUA of verse 21.
Yehovah did not violate His own law. When did Yehovah "lie with her" as Deuteronomy 22 says? The act of lying with her, would be the sin. The result of being pregnant is not the sin just like it wouldn't be for a rape victim. Found to be pregnant WITHOUT LYING WITH HER (without sinning), is the miraculous sign given to Isaiah. We know Joseph did not lie with her until after the birth of Yeshua. We also know that the Spirit of God did not lie with her because that would be sin. But Miriam is pregnant. That's why Isaiah's "almah" (young maiden) is a virgin as the Septuagint says and as the clue of the closed mem in the middle of a word in a prophecy shows a hidden pearl of truth. The rest of Tanak alludes to this very miracle because we find.many clues in the text. Yehovah has a "begotten son" and the sign to Isaiah is only a sign if it's not a normal human interaction. Miriam is the name of one who brings forth the savior both human (Moses and his sister Miriam bringing forth Moses out of the water of the nile) and this Miriam, who also brings forth the Savior from the water of the birth canal. IOW, Yehovah has so many hidden details that show Yeshua as a miraculous human unlike any who has ever lived. It is "silliness" to ignore all of them. As to the vengeance argument, Torah says that Yehovah is the one to take vengeance, not man. So how is Yehovah violating His law? His law says vengeance belongs to Him. That's not a violation, that is carrying out what the law says. Your argument would mean that anything said in Torah, Yehovah is subject to. IOW, when Torah says man will die, then according to your argument, God will die because it would violate His words if He didn't. Or when Torah says build a Temple or fashion a lamp stand or make a curtain or sacrifice a lamb....if God does not also do these things, then He is violating His own law. That's a false argument. What God does not do is go against what He says He will do which is carry out His words. How many times does He tell us He is the one to take vengeance? Many many many times. Once, in Lev 19, we find Him telling man vengeance is not his to take and we know this BECAUSE umpteen times He says vengeance belongs to God. That's not a violation. That's "watching over His word to perform it."
@@scottandchels6813 I'll try and state an assumption up front that you can correct or redirect if needed. I was referring Phillipians 2:5-9 but specifically 2:7 The assumption, based on subject matter of Nehemias videos and Keith's and their theologies that pervade through thin in compliment with your phrasing of "on the other hand" in your reply to this post subject immediately points to me that you are attempting to draw distinction between Jesus as a man and God as God. What I perceive from people that do this, and this isnt an assumption, it's well founded experience, is they completely neglect what the scriptures teach about Jesus both before Mary's birth and after the resurrection. This is consistent in both trinitarian and non trinitarian views whether to draw the claim that God is 3 separate persons or that God is the Father, and Jesus isnt God. I'm not a trinitarian by the way. Nor do I support either of the two major oneness views, but that's neither here nor there, just adding a little perceptive background to my stance. Either way, God is not bound to the law, in the strict sense of the mosaic rulings. I dont think wed disabree with that. Neither was Jesus even if be adopted them as a human. He makes it a point to throw off to the Pharisees about divorce that Moses gave them divorce because of hardness of heart, but from the beginning it had not been that way(paraphrased) The point is, Moses statutes aren't ideal to God. They're made ideal for man, if he ever could keep them, because he is flawed. They are not necessarily 100pct reflective of Gods desired order. They seem to be supplementing an obvious lack of order, sin. Long reply but the jest of what was referenced to my comment to you specifically is in the 3ed and 4th section.
The talmud isn't a teaching in itsself. Its is a collection of q&a from rabbis. Like a transcription index of school board type issues. You have a question presented and then an answer. Then other rabbis come behind either supporting or arguing the prior statements each attempting their best to portray their point of view. Usually there is a consensus on the issue that is in some cases either erroneously ignorant or outlandishly protective. In their defense, in many cases their intention was covering all bases to the letter to keep mosaic laws from being broken. To ask if it's wrong teaching is a wrong question from unfamiliarity with the text I believe. For a Christian, there are many good nuggets of info there. You get to see new ways or rediscovered ways that the text was interpreted and connected from one book to the next which is huge, but you also find many things after you figure out how the draw their arguments and how they share them how insanely bright many of these men were. They changed entirely they way I read and understand Paul and I can now see in many ways how Paul drew his answers. Not from the talmud, but what he was doing with the old testament in his letters. On the flipside, the question is is every ruling true and is it authoritative. Without a doubt whatsoever, absolutely not in many instances. In some, or many, yes and maybe. This would take discernment from the reader lining up what you're told with the true scriptures. No different than sitting in front of or underneath any pastor in person, over the phone, tv, etc.. Acts 17:11
I want so badly to be part of this study. Unfortunately with a income that leaves nothing after paying bills, I suppose that I’ll never be aloud to enter the HOLY of HOLYS. 😕
Thank you for your work. The holy spirit was the instrument through who's power of translation of mary renders the possibility of God, Elohim, the Father being the father and thus Yehuda (Jehova, Jesus Christ) the Son of God!! He, the Holy Spirit, also has the power to perform the marriage!!
Honestly, I'm just a little disappointed that such a controversy of Matthew 1:18 occured when I so wanted to learn more about the rest of Matthew chapter 1
Shalom Shabbat, ... I have been told that "Shalom" also means "Let's go Camping (Sukkot/Booths) with YHWH/YHVH" .... because once you go camping for "Over 7 Days" with someone you find out the two of you get along.
@@skeeterburke Try using the Toilet Paper in a Military MRE ... we called MRE back in the 80s "Meals Refused by Ethiopia" I don't remember anyone using the MRE Toilet paper as TP but only as Kleenix. Here are a few pics. www.google.com/search?safe=active&rlz=1C1AFAB_enUS642US644&sxsrf=ALeKk01kamGJdbEJvyFGHQ07nN36PeCT7Q:1592194694070&source=univ&tbm=isch&q=Toilet+paper+picture+in+a+MRE&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjrvJy5-4LqAhUaVs0KHf3ZB_cQsAR6BAgKEAE&biw=1200&bih=751
I have listened to all of the Open Door series, much of Torah pearls and now this series and still can’t figure out if Keith believes in Yeshua/Jesus as the messiah. That is; a personal saviour, the lamb of God, one sacrifice for all, our great high priest. Obviously Nehemiah does not and clearly says so, which makes me wonder about how he views the sacrificial requirements of Jews (inc himself) today. Regarding the subject of paying for the content by subscribing: Of course I understand “the worker is worth his wages” but if you are uncovering key foundational truths which change or alter the understanding, cause or means of human salvation should that be knowledge that we are required to pay for. If anyone can tell me more about Keith or Nehemiah’s current belief (or not) in Yeshua as messiah I would be genuinely interested. Many thanks.
Whether someone agrees or disagrees with the views presented, they have to respect true seeking of knowledge. Also, if you want an extremely polished sounding mic, look at the LCT 240 pro. Gives you a studio finished sound for cheap! Shalom
Hebrew names represent a prophetic sense. That really applies to any ancient culture, east or west. Whatever the name is given is prophetic in nature. So what isaiah 7:14 says, qara shem, call his name. That phrase is directed to the mother. The mother shall call his name. To call, qara, doesnt mean to speak. It carries the sense of summoning or appointing. Think of it en English as call FOR, maybe roll call for attendance. You call a name, but it's not to be saying it, you're summoning the other person to make there presence known. Speaking is passive. Calling requires action from another party. So appoint his name, his destiny or nature.... to hit back on this. Immanuel. With us is God. So to me she is tasked with not naming him that specifically. But appointing over him a title representative of what his nature is reckoned to be. Again, in the old testament this seems to work as a binding prophecy. So she names him..... Yeshua. Yah is salvation. Now when you play that back on Immanuels translation you arrive at a much grander picture of what the new testament teaches in my perspective. In my opinion. If immanuel was to be his name, the hebrew wouldve omitted the word vqarat for and you shall call altogether and simply said you shall name him. The name immanuel isnt translated into its meaning. Several other verses have the title translated for you. In that case he should have all sorts of names.
I often lately wonder what happen to the that malek of Yéhova of the hebrew older writings, that one ambassador that had much authority over the nations. Is is Gabriel now, the one bringing the messages to certian people in the writings of people before 70AD? Who is the malak bringing the words of Yéhova to mary, Zechariah, the shepards, peter and Joseph, even Daniel?
“The Protoevangelium of James” has a compelling take on the Temple legalities of the Joseph & Mary apparent controversy. Jerry Springer aint got nuttin’ on dis’.
The virgin birth issue was actually from the second century between the Netzerim and the Ebionites, Netzerim were disciples of Yeshua and the ebionites were disciples of John
@@garlandjones7709 miles Jones a historian and a Linguist speaks of it in his book, “The sons of Zion vs. the sons of Greece”. Also the Ebionites were probably influenced by the sect of Judaism that opposed Paul on his spiritual interpretation of circumcision and other issues that put a breach between the Notzerim and the Rabbinic Jews. The Ebionites did not believe in the virgin birth, but believed that Yeshua inherited his title as God’s son after he was baptized by John. They had a very literal interpretation of the Torah, which in itself was credible and reasonable.But they literally throw out the book of Matthew and Paul’s teachings, as heretical, basically the Ebionites were a sect of Judaism that believed in Yeshua, probably the same type of group that opposed Paul and Barnabus. They also believed that you had to be poor to be a spiritual person, as their names Ebon, from Hebrew means poor. They probably also followers of James the leader of the Church in Jerusalem.
@@nickstrickland4751 Thanks for clarifying. Regarding Paul and circumcision i see reference to Deuteronomy 30:6 and a handful of other deuteronomic verses in light of this if that's not addressed in what youve studied. Either way, thanks again.
I have read, prayed, & thought on this. I trust the two of y’all more than any others than YHVH, Yeho’Shua, & Ruach. Maybe myself at times. Honestly I do not have a solid position. The wise men followed a stare. The costalation of the virgin. The end time prophecies. All of them. I feel like something is missed.
The wisemen didn’t follow at STAR. They followed many things. They followed Jupiter.. the planets were brighter than the other stars. Planet means BRIGHT STAR. 😢
Isn’t there an example in the tenach that foreshadows Matthew 1:18? Didnt the Spirit hover above the waters or the void? Perhaps this is the same action of the Holy Spirit by which Miriam is made to be pregnant . 🤔
As a virgin birth denier(Joesph was/is his father just as testified) I've heard many of the same considerations as you two presented in this video. However there is another aspect which I have not heard covered which I believe is important and should be considered. Joseph was/is of the house and lineage of David, testified by both Matthew and Luke(no mention of Mary). As such, his son is also an heir to king David's throne and establishing his authenticity is somewhat important. Certain assumptions must be clarified such as his paternity. Another question could be establishing his mother's virginity. According to the law, Deuteronomy 22:13-21, this is a capital offense if the womans parents cannot present her tokens of virginity in the presence of the elders should her husband pursue this publicly. Might this be what Joseph was considering in verse 19? It should be noted the the Greek text of Matthew 1:18 when considering the phrase 'before they came together' is not the same meaning as Hebrew Matthew's 'knew her'. In the Greek this phrase means literally before they came together, meaning before they co-habitated, not before they knew each other or to be blunt, before they had sex. The storyline is plain and simple. As I explained in my last comment on the Matthew 1:1-16 video, there is no problem with the counts of 14 generations IF you follow Matthew's instructions of where to begin and end each count. When this count is understood and counted correctly, Joseph is the father of Jesus as testified man times in the new testament. In order for Jesus to be born in the fulness of time, the Holy Spirit overshadowed(influenced and led) Mary to lie with Joseph during their betrothal but before their hoppa(this is out of the ordinary but not a sin). However, her parents were unaware and did not prepare her tokens of virginity. After she was discovered to be pregnant, this presented a challenge to Joseph in his inability to prove Mary's virginity thus bringing into question Jesus' legitimacy to David's throne. "Philip findeth Nathanael, and saith unto him, We have found him, of whom Moses in the law, and the prophets, did write, Jesus of Nazareth, the son of Joseph." John 1:45 "And they said, Is not this Jesus, the son of Joseph, whose father and mother we know? how is it then that he saith, I came down from heaven?" John 6:42 "Is not this the carpenter's son? is not his mother called Mary? and his brethren, James, and Joses, and Simon, and Judas?" Matthew 13:55 "And when they saw him, they were amazed: and his mother said unto him, Son, why hast thou thus dealt with us? behold, thy father and I have sought thee sorrowing." Luke 2:48 "That which is born of the flesh is flesh; and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit." John 3:6
John 8:41, Jesus to pharisees, "You are doing the deeds of your father." They said to him, "We were not born of fornication; we have one Father, God". They not only imply he wasnt Joseph's son, but that he has two fathers reinforcing the fact, who he recognizes as Joseph, and who they presume to be his seed bearer. Either way, they understood Joseph wasnt his dad.
I don think you understand Genesis 48. Adopted are as natural born. Who cares if Yeshua was adoted, he was the son of Joseph. Also Exidus 12 & 22, Leviticus 19 & 25. Do not oppress the stranger. from which the commentators get ""do not oppress/remind the convert, not even their grand children. But, remember thay are also human and as much a believer as you.
@@tccarr7162 im familsr with Jacobs blessings. The issue i raised was against virgin birth denial from within the text. The idea was they knew he didnt belong to Joseph. This has nothing to do with legal statutes, but literalness vs essentially "bs" wrapped in a nice blanket about how God could be his father.
Can you please Help me? I want a copy of The Gospel of Matthew in Hebrew That Barnabas (St. Paul's traveling companion) was buried with. Barnabas's own handwritten copy that was buried with him. You know the one The Vatican has stored away somewhere
From what I'm hearing, it's only like murder if the woman is engaged or married. If she is a widow. Or not a virgin from a man who had sex with her, maybe he did or didn't pay the price, but refused to marry her. If that female was raped it was not like murder.
Yahovah created the heavens and the earth by the power in his holy spirit.His power let there be light.Yahovah said so.Because he says so . Yahovah has all power and might and all things are possible with Yahovah our God what he says will happen always happens.
Hi there, First off all thank you for sharing this. I found one thing difficult. The title of the teaching suggests that it will cover part of the chapter where in fact it covers almost one verse mostly. And then you invite to plus series. I understand that everything requires resources. Maybe instead of producing one episode that enroles viewers for premium contents you just open up a paid course setup or collect estimated budget via kickstarter type of mechanism. I believe it would increase the level of transparency.
Nehemiah Gordo GRACIAS por tu enseñanza en verdad me parece cronológicamente lógico el resultado de tus estudios. En Puebla Méxicos te espero de visita en tu próxima expedición a México. ""Mi casa es tu casa"" Cómo maestro de la RAÍZ del idioma original del compendio de libros llamados Biblia es de mucha mayor comprensión la enseñanza retirando o quitando todas las expresiones religiosas que se añadieron en su traducción a otros idiomas o versiones.
I believe that Yeshua of Nazareth is King David born again. (Psalm 71:20)You who have made me see many troubles and calamities will revive me again; from the depths of the earth you will bring me up again. (Psalm 30:3)O Lord, thou hast brought up my soul from the grave: thou hast kept me alive, that I should not go down to the pit. (Psalm 118:17)-I shall not die, but live, And declare the works of the Lord.) (Jeremiah 30:9)- But they shall serve the Lord their God, and David their king, whom I will raise up unto them. ) (Psalm 40:70)-Then said I, Lo, I come: in the volume of the book it is written of me,) (Hosea 3:5)- Afterward shall the children of Israel return, and seek the Lord their God, and David their king; and shall fear the Lord and his goodness in the latter days.) (Ezekiel 34:23)- And I will set up one shepherd over them, and he shall feed them, even my servant David; he shall feed them, and he shall be their shepherd.) (Ezekiel 37:24) -And David my servant shall be king over them; and they all shall have one shepherd: they shall also walk in my judgments, and observe my statutes, and do them.) (John 10:16) - And other sheep I have, which are not of this fold: them also I must bring, and they shall hear my voice; and there shall be one fold, and one shepherd.) (Psalm 41:9-10) - Yea, mine own familiar friend, in whom I trusted, which did eat of my bread, hath lifted up his heel against me. But thou, O Lord, be merciful unto me, and raise me up, that I may requite them.) (John 13:18)- “I do not speak concerning all of you. I know whom I have chosen; but that the Scripture may be fulfilled, ‘He who eats [c]bread with Me has lifted up his heel against Me.’ 19 Now I tell you before it comes, that when it does come to pass, you may believe that I am HE.)
@@GarmentofEsau you'll find no scriptures on reincarnations like that. Jesus makes the abel parallel. Kf you take Paul into account hes Adam too. If you take John into account hes Isaac. Jews say hes Joseph, both then and now. The reality is all of those serve as anticipatory types of what to expect from him. Hes not all of them rolled up into one. According to David hed have to be Solomon. According to Moses hed have to be Joshua. I can run this list out for hours. At the second coming hes Joshua and Noah both before he ever exists as zdavid. Not being David is why Jews didnt accept him. The bible teaches reincarnation. But at a set appointed time in history. Not reentry immediately upon death. Yeshua also made himself to be Elijah. He made ALL believers to be Elisha. Paul did the same I THINK in the Elsisha sense, but I cant think of a specific verse off hand. Theres a scholar I have a work from that lost his entire faith over the Elijah/Elisha narrative. Without reading his work on that specific subject, I wonder if he even caught the rest of them.
@@garlandjones7709 being Born again is very clear throughout the Bible to those who are Torah centric. That is why the sages of Israel have believed a man can be born again through his widows womb(Deuteronomy25). It's a key concept to understand the El of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. The El who visits the sin of the the fathers upon the children. By no means leaving the fathers unpunished. Deuteronomy 32:39 ‘Now see that I, even I, am He, And there is no God besides Me; I kill and I make alive; I wound and I heal; Nor is there any who can deliver from My hand. Exodus 34:7 keeping mercy for thousands, forgiving iniquity and transgression and sin, by no means clearing the guilty, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children and the children’s children to the third and the fourth generation.” Sanhidrin 91B Our Rabbis taught: I kill, and I make alive. I might interpret, I kill one person and give life to another, as the world goes on: therefore the Writ states, I wound, and I heal. Just as the wounding and healing [obviously] refer to the same person, so putting to death and bringing to life refer to the same person. This refutes those who maintain that resurrection is not intimated in the Torah. Rava raises a contradiction. It is written: “I will kill and I will bring to life” (Deuteronomy 32:39), indicating that God is capable of reviving the dead. And it is written immediately afterward: “I wounded and I will heal,” which indicates that God will only heal the wounded. Rather, it should be understood: The Holy One, Blessed be He, is saying: What I kill, I bring to life, indicating that God revives the dead. And then what I wounded, I will heal.
You don’t need to convert to Christianity, you need to make Yeshua HaMeshiyach your Lord, Master, Saviour, Great God Almighty YeHoVaH at the right hand of YeHoVaH and worship him in spirit and truth and obey the Gospel of Yeshua HaMeshiyach.
This makes no sense to me if they found Mary with child or expecting but the Angel spoke to a VIRGIN Mary and said you will have a child and she never knew a man why would God pick a woman who is about to have sex with a random man who she never married (because Joseph) didn't want to bring her shame by devorce but was hiding her that would be to say that Mary did not have sex with Joseph and was pregnant to another random person by your stating that the Spirit FOUND her pregnant this is Blasphemy... She was clearly a virgin who was given the child of God by his spirit as the Angel said she would have a child and it will be called Yeshua for he will save and so on.
I struggle to grasp why you would do this as well, but it the root is not understanding Yeshua as yhvh/"god" and just a messianic man. That's where this is coming from whether or not its apparent in just this video alone.
IESOUS' conception: Iehovah did not violate His own law (I think NG is being silly or other). The result of Mary being pregnant is the result of God's power of the holy spirit of transferring Iesous' life directly into her womb. Furthermore God used the covered relationship between Mary and Joseph to protect this miraculous birth of Yeshua to avoid any hint of violation of the law.
Keith, your question about what "from the Holy Spirit" means is rather a non-requiter. It is not a curve ball. The Holy Spirit was the "instrument" as you put it. The Holy Spirit would not have to "discover" that Miriam was pregnant. He already knew that. Sorry, but that really is an errant question. The only way to understand this is that the Holy Spirit was the source (not in a physical seed way) of her becoming pregnant. It really is very simple!
How did Jesus called himself or his head apostel according to scripture: Acts 2:22 Ye men of Israel, hear these words; Jesus of Nazareth; For we have heard him say, that this Jesus of Nazareth shall destroy this place, and shall change the customs which Moses delivered us. Acts 6:14 For we have heard him say, that this Jesus of Nazareth shall destroy ...... Acts 22:8 And I answered, Who art thou, Lord? And he said unto me, I am Jesus of Nazareth, whom thou persecutest.; So why is the first line of the Hebrew Matthew anti Christ by some religious people? While in acts Jesus calls himself by his Jewish name ? Matthew 24:5 For many shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and shall deceive many. Logically i read inspirated by acts, For many shall come in my name(Jesus of Nazareth ), saying, I am Christ(Messiah); But thats to anybody to decide.
IF THERE WAS NOT A 3RD PERSON HS THEN ONE WOULD HAVE TO BELIEVE THE TRADITIONS OF OUR FATHERS, WHICH TAKES GREAT FAITH AND TRUST. SO IF NO 3RD PERSON HS THEN WHO WOULD THEY BLAME? FOR MARYS BEING PREGNANT? THEN THEIR PLACING A 3RD PERSON HS HERE ACCOUNTS FOR KEEPING BELIEVERS FROM TORAH. THANKS MARCION AND CONSTANTINE!
There's no adultery or fornication on a artificial insemination, which is basically what happens to Mary, she was the first woman virgin or not, that is mentioned by name to be pregnant by an artificial mean, the other women are mentioned in a general way in genesis 6. So artificial insemination is not a form of adultery or fornication
![BLACK BAG - Official Trailer [HD] - Only in Theaters March 14](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Du0Xp8WX_7I/mqdefault.jpg)
When I first turned toward YHWH, I mistakenly thought I was a Christian, since I had been raised in Christianity.
But like Keith testified, I started intensely studying the Word.
When I went to my Christian Church sharing what I learned, so excited to be part of a family of Believers, they either chastised me for what I learned from the Scriptures, or had no clue what the Scripture actually said.
I was so miserable until I put off all the Christian indoctrination, and read the Scriptures with an open mind.
It was then that I realized that from the beginning YHWH was building a Family of His own called Israel, and as Paul clearly states over and over, all those who turn to the Hebrew Messiah are adopted into the Christian family, no, no, no, they are adopted into, grafted into the Family Tree of Abraham, making them Hebrews, and as Moses wrote, adopted into the Family of Israel through Ephraim.
And although my new found Family is spread out over the World, I know I will be united with them soon, and my Father and Brother are with me always.
Thanks Keith and Nehemiah 💞 I love you guys.
YHVH bless Nehemiah Gordon! ✝️ ❤️ 🕎
Let the Holy Spirit guides you into all truths..
Thanks Nehemia for these studies and have also watched studies with Sighted Moon. Thanks again
Would love to buy Nehemias interlinear translation of Hebrew Matthew
+Nehemia Gordon
I can't find where it even exist.
Thank you Keith and Nehemia for opening our understanding of how to rightfully divide the word. It takes commitment and dedication
doing this type of study. May Elohim Bless you both from SA.
The world is falling apart. People NEED conversations like this, with depth. We need it. Please dont stop, even though its awkward for you at times Nehemia, I'm sure.
Conversation like this is beautiful. But at the same time, all facts have to be checked.
Shabbat Shalom. Yeshua bless you guys!
Thank you BOTH!!! This Absolutely amazingly beautiful!!! To YeHoVah be the Glory forever and ever!
To be honest, this is the only way I want to study the gospels. It's My first time studying the gospels and I'm enjoying everything of it. I couldn't ask for a better teacher, Thank you Nehemia
You two are just outstanding and I thank God for bring you both together. Wonderful conversation!
Thank you both!
Wish I had hundreds of thousands of dollars to give to you both!
Shabbat Shalom & YeHoVaH Bless you both! So grateful for ALL you do. May the fruits of all your labour greatly Bless many!
Brother KJ. You have grown in The Word & in YHVH. Hallelujah & Amen.
What a blessing you are Nehemiah! Thank you to you and Keith for doing this study. Just wow!❤
Shabbat Shalom Nehemia and Keith , thanks for the video , Yehovah bless !
What an enjoyable way to learn about the Bible
I really love listening to you and lean, Praise Yahova that has opened my eyes to many things. I have tried to sign up to both of your website many times with two different emails and I haven't been Abel to do so.
Thank you for all you both do.
Amazing Hebrew Gospel Pearls Lesson, Thank you both 🙋💞
It’s written in Daniel to close up the book. As the books are being opened keep in mind that these guys are taking us deeper into the mysteries that are revealed below the surface. May God bless both of you abundantly. Thank you
This is monumental ! May YHVH strengthen you guys!! 🙏🏽
Listening to the study while preparing Shabbat dinner. Mind blown. Keep up the excellent work. Yehovah bless you both!
You guys are blowing things up! Loving it! Many blessings upon you and your house. Shalom 🙏
Thank you for this amazing episode!! And also, I really, really appreciated the little caption rectangles below that clarified things like which exact verses were being talked about or what exactly the book title was ... so super helpful for me as a listener! But I also know that stuff like that takes a whole extra pile of time and effort on your part, so THANK YOU! And it was very useful and noticed! Shalom! May Yehovah continue to bless your paths!
Glad it was helpful!
I concur, those titles at the bottom are SUPER HELPFUL!
I'm really looking forward to this. Thankyou Keith and Nehemia.
Nehemiah thanks for the effort,🇵🇷
Great talk brothers. Thank you for addressing a different point of view and understanding!
Many thanks Keith and Nehemiah for these treasures. Yehovah bless you both.
I understand Nehemiah's discomfort with this topic. His forbearance and prudence are noted and much appreciated.
Leí todos los comentarios, y hasta el 5 de Julio de 2020, no había un comentario en castellano; así, que por ser un poco "rebelde" a pesar que sé inglés, lo haré en castellano... ¡Es genial aprender con ustedes dos! y... cada día salen cosas que "sabía" y llegan nuevos conocimientos... Yehovah los continue bendiciendo para que puedan hacer este trabajo tan maravilloso que han hecho... Bendiciones Nehemia y Keith
Keith, WOW! 😍 Verse 19 "she is more righteous than I." I appreciate you. Praise YHVH🙏
Keith and Nehemia - Thank you for your efforts on this endeavor as we all are seeking Truth. Here is something to consider. What are these passages NOT saying? Did it say "Mary has been found in adultery" or "The child that you will bare will be a bastard" ? And what if we do as Nehemia wisely stated by reading Luke in conjunction with Matthew. Did it say "Mary, you are a harlot and deserve stoning" or "the child you will conceive (future tense) will be marked and will roam in the wilderness eating grass like an animal" Nope! it did not say that! In fact, and this is what I love about the Luke account, Mary had to agree to it! (Luke 1:38) She came into alignment with YHVH's plan for redemption! Thanks again! Keep Reading, Keep Searching!
Thank you Nehemia, Yehova bless you and your family
I appreciate you both so much. Thank you ❤ Your work makes me love Yehovah, His Word Yeshua even more so.
Yes, we do get that from Luke - Ruach Ha Qodesh (the Holy Spirit) was the instrument by which Miriam was impregnated. This landmark study is a real blessing, and I Thank YeHoVaH for you both! Keith, at 43-45 minutes that's a real Pearl - and a connection I never saw before this study.
I like the reference to the "benefit of the doubt" aspect in connection with Joseph's attested righteousness. The Mosaic Law had built in a discretion of grace or differently put, It seems that a hurt party could choose NOT to bring charges after all, which implied their righteousness due to the gracious attitude towards the offender and by giving them the benefit of the doubt. Case in point: "13 “IF any man takes a wife and goes in to her and then hates her 14 and accuses her of misconduct and brings a bad name upon her, saying, ‘I took this woman, and when I came near her, I did not find in her evidence of virginity,’ 15 THEN ..." (Deut 22:13ff; emphasis mine).The case law wording IF ... THEN includes here: IF he thinks she cheated on him during the betrothal period AND he choses to ACCUSE her, THEN the prescribed investigation has to follow. So, even the Mosaic Law does not seem to oblige the hurt party to press charges. Not to do so then is an expression of righteousness and graciousness. Joseph exemplified it.
Bingo
I have listened to all of the hebrew gospel pearls and as an atheist Judaism is old Christianity or Christianity is the new Judaism ✡ ✝️ they are only really discussing semantics i love it
God bless!
So deep. Thank you, gentlemen, for doing this.
Keith mentioned that Hebrew Gospel Pearls #1 was last week. It was actually 2 weeks ago on May 29.
Kieth gets so excited that he sometimes interrupts but Nehemia patiently bears it.
And I see it just the opposite, Nehemia talks so fast and so much, Keith has to interrupt in order to get a word in.
Several times Keith had to get Nehemia to slow down so they would not Passover important parts of Scripture.
@@thruthelensofscripture4919 Nehemia is autistic and it is a miracle of God that he does so well. As for me, I am well familiar with Scripture and when Nehemia mentions one I immediately know what he is talking about, so his excited talk is rather joyful to me. However, the two do play off of each other well.
@@davidbrogan606 Unbelievably well, hard to find that in this world.
@@davidbrogan606 I'm guessing when you say Scriptures you mean the Hebrew Scriptures.
Like many others, I am searching for the Gospels, or any of the Books or Letters the Christians called the New Testament that were originally written in Hebrew, then translated into English.
It is so hard because almost everything is translated from Greek to Hebrew to English, which makes no sense.
@@thruthelensofscripture4919 It is far from universally accepted that the Gospels were penned in Hebrew. But Matthew has a good amount of proof that it was originally written in Hebrew. Nehemia and Michael Rood both have videos that go deeply into it.
When I say Scripture, I mean all the Bible from Genesis to Revelation.
Shabbat Shalom from England 💙❤💜
Shabat shalom Guys😊. Wow, wow, wow. Thank you, thank you, thank you Keith, thank you, thank you, thank you Nehemia. I love it, I love it, I love it 🥰. Ok my simple intake, since Yeshua's birth has been prophesied from long ago, Yehovah knew just how HE was going to do it (n confuse us at the same time) n when. After all it was through Adam n Chavah that death came... In both Luke n Matthew, that I can understand, Miriam is 'engaged' to Yosef, n Miriam was with child by the Holy Spirit n power....... Remembering GOD is still in charge here. Keith, I will say the instrument. She already knows, she accepts.
There is an obvious parallel between the Creation when the Spirit Of God moved upon the face of the waters and the Spirit overshadowing Mariam unto pregnancy.
Shabbat Shalom all
This is a absolutely amazing!
At the 34:12 mark when you're talking about the Anglican priest - PLEASE PLEASE make this a RUclips short! "We don't believe in silly things" and your reasoning after that, it's a Gospel pearl
Being alive in every single minute occurred, feeding the invisible soul, guided with mighty hand of the real King of the whole universe. This can be counted as more than a price of the earth! Great prices are awaiting for you all, and be the "Strong Wings" of "YeHoYaH" protected you until the end of this battle!
Love it
The Spit it of Truth is truly a leader and counselor leading as a lamp unto our feet for wisdom understanding and a opening mind. Right on fellows. ( I must add I think rood has gone off the deep end over his head somewhere)
Bog vas blagoslovio
Nehemiah, Keith, good stuff. I wanted to point out that the Catholic teaching on Mary is that she is the new ARK. Many commentators have noted that the language of the annunciation is Tabernacle language. Luke records,
"And the angel answered her, “The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you; therefore the child to be born will be called holy-the Son of God." So here not only do we see the notion of עבר, but you also have the Tabernacle notion of the shechinah casting a shadow over the mercy seat. And while the old Ark contained the manna and the stone tablets, Mary the new Ark will carry the word made flesh, the Bread of Life come down from heaven.
Where is the video on ch1 verse 21? Yall did video on ch 1:1-17 then ch1:18 only and then jumped to ch2. Did I miss something? Yall talked about virgin birth but no naming YESHUA of verse 21.
Yehovah did not violate His own law. When did Yehovah "lie with her" as Deuteronomy 22 says? The act of lying with her, would be the sin. The result of being pregnant is not the sin just like it wouldn't be for a rape victim. Found to be pregnant WITHOUT LYING WITH HER (without sinning), is the miraculous sign given to Isaiah. We know Joseph did not lie with her until after the birth of Yeshua. We also know that the Spirit of God did not lie with her because that would be sin. But Miriam is pregnant. That's why Isaiah's "almah" (young maiden) is a virgin as the Septuagint says and as the clue of the closed mem in the middle of a word in a prophecy shows a hidden pearl of truth. The rest of Tanak alludes to this very miracle because we find.many clues in the text. Yehovah has a "begotten son" and the sign to Isaiah is only a sign if it's not a normal human interaction. Miriam is the name of one who brings forth the savior both human (Moses and his sister Miriam bringing forth Moses out of the water of the nile) and this Miriam, who also brings forth the Savior from the water of the birth canal. IOW, Yehovah has so many hidden details that show Yeshua as a miraculous human unlike any who has ever lived. It is "silliness" to ignore all of them.
As to the vengeance argument, Torah says that Yehovah is the one to take vengeance, not man. So how is Yehovah violating His law? His law says vengeance belongs to Him. That's not a violation, that is carrying out what the law says. Your argument would mean that anything said in Torah, Yehovah is subject to. IOW, when Torah says man will die, then according to your argument, God will die because it would violate His words if He didn't. Or when Torah says build a Temple or fashion a lamp stand or make a curtain or sacrifice a lamb....if God does not also do these things, then He is violating His own law. That's a false argument.
What God does not do is go against what He says He will do which is carry out His words. How many times does He tell us He is the one to take vengeance? Many many many times. Once, in Lev 19, we find Him telling man vengeance is not his to take and we know this BECAUSE umpteen times He says vengeance belongs to God. That's not a violation. That's "watching over His word to perform it."
Amen and amen
Well said. I would add that Yeshua on the other hand was subject to Torah.
@@scottandchels6813 in a sense. He claimed he gave the torah. Also refer to Phillipians 2
@@garlandjones7709 can you explain yourself a bit better please. In Phil2 are you referring to Yeshua subjecting himself to death on a cross?
@@scottandchels6813 I'll try and state an assumption up front that you can correct or redirect if needed.
I was referring Phillipians 2:5-9 but specifically 2:7
The assumption, based on subject matter of Nehemias videos and Keith's and their theologies that pervade through thin in compliment with your phrasing of "on the other hand" in your reply to this post subject immediately points to me that you are attempting to draw distinction between Jesus as a man and God as God.
What I perceive from people that do this, and this isnt an assumption, it's well founded experience, is they completely neglect what the scriptures teach about Jesus both before Mary's birth and after the resurrection.
This is consistent in both trinitarian and non trinitarian views whether to draw the claim that God is 3 separate persons or that God is the Father, and Jesus isnt God. I'm not a trinitarian by the way. Nor do I support either of the two major oneness views, but that's neither here nor there, just adding a little perceptive background to my stance.
Either way, God is not bound to the law, in the strict sense of the mosaic rulings. I dont think wed disabree with that. Neither was Jesus even if be adopted them as a human. He makes it a point to throw off to the Pharisees about divorce that Moses gave them divorce because of hardness of heart, but from the beginning it had not been that way(paraphrased)
The point is, Moses statutes aren't ideal to God. They're made ideal for man, if he ever could keep them, because he is flawed. They are not necessarily 100pct reflective of Gods desired order. They seem to be supplementing an obvious lack of order, sin.
Long reply but the jest of what was referenced to my comment to you specifically is in the 3ed and 4th section.
I love y’all.
Shabbat Shalom Nehemia, this is Pancho, If you are planning to put this into Spanish, I will gladly do it for you!
Awesome
41:25 tackling the Giants
Ty for this both of you. I have a question, is the teaching of the talmud wrong?
I would like this info too.
The talmud isn't a teaching in itsself. Its is a collection of q&a from rabbis. Like a transcription index of school board type issues. You have a question presented and then an answer. Then other rabbis come behind either supporting or arguing the prior statements each attempting their best to portray their point of view. Usually there is a consensus on the issue that is in some cases either erroneously ignorant or outlandishly protective. In their defense, in many cases their intention was covering all bases to the letter to keep mosaic laws from being broken.
To ask if it's wrong teaching is a wrong question from unfamiliarity with the text I believe. For a Christian, there are many good nuggets of info there. You get to see new ways or rediscovered ways that the text was interpreted and connected from one book to the next which is huge, but you also find many things after you figure out how the draw their arguments and how they share them how insanely bright many of these men were. They changed entirely they way I read and understand Paul and I can now see in many ways how Paul drew his answers. Not from the talmud, but what he was doing with the old testament in his letters.
On the flipside, the question is is every ruling true and is it authoritative. Without a doubt whatsoever, absolutely not in many instances. In some, or many, yes and maybe. This would take discernment from the reader lining up what you're told with the true scriptures. No different than sitting in front of or underneath any pastor in person, over the phone, tv, etc..
Acts 17:11
@@smileyone6186 ^
I want so badly to be part of this study. Unfortunately with a income that leaves nothing after paying bills, I suppose that I’ll never be aloud to enter the HOLY of HOLYS. 😕
Thank you for your work.
The holy spirit was the instrument through who's power of translation of mary renders the possibility of God, Elohim, the Father being the father and thus Yehuda (Jehova, Jesus Christ) the Son of God!! He, the Holy Spirit, also has the power to perform the marriage!!
Honestly, I'm just a little disappointed that such a controversy of Matthew 1:18 occured when I so wanted to learn more about the rest of Matthew chapter 1
Shalom Shabbat, ... I have been told that "Shalom" also means "Let's go Camping (Sukkot/Booths) with YHWH/YHVH" .... because once you go camping for "Over 7 Days" with someone you find out the two of you get along.
Lol you learn how to share a roll of toilet paper
@@skeeterburke Try using the Toilet Paper in a Military MRE ... we called MRE back in the 80s "Meals Refused by Ethiopia" I don't remember anyone using the MRE Toilet paper as TP but only as Kleenix. Here are a few pics.
www.google.com/search?safe=active&rlz=1C1AFAB_enUS642US644&sxsrf=ALeKk01kamGJdbEJvyFGHQ07nN36PeCT7Q:1592194694070&source=univ&tbm=isch&q=Toilet+paper+picture+in+a+MRE&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjrvJy5-4LqAhUaVs0KHf3ZB_cQsAR6BAgKEAE&biw=1200&bih=751
I have listened
to all of the Open Door series, much of Torah pearls and now this series and still can’t figure out if Keith believes in Yeshua/Jesus as the messiah. That is; a personal saviour, the lamb of God, one sacrifice for all, our great high priest. Obviously Nehemiah does not and clearly says so, which makes me wonder about how he views the sacrificial requirements of Jews (inc himself) today. Regarding the subject of paying for the content by subscribing: Of course I understand “the worker is worth his wages” but if you are uncovering key foundational truths which change or alter the understanding, cause or means of human salvation should that be knowledge that we are required to pay for. If anyone can tell me more about Keith or Nehemiah’s current belief (or not) in Yeshua as messiah I would be genuinely interested.
Many thanks.
Been thinking the same thing. Kinda strange lol
# SHALOM ALEIKHEM ~🙏💥
# JUDAIC @ NAIC, PHILIPPINES ~ 🇵🇭🇵🇭🇵🇭
Whether someone agrees or disagrees with the views presented, they have to respect true seeking of knowledge. Also, if you want an extremely polished sounding mic, look at the LCT 240 pro. Gives you a studio finished sound for cheap! Shalom
Please Sir's I want some more"
Nehemia, What happened to the true Name of the Messiah Immanuel??
Hebrew names represent a prophetic sense. That really applies to any ancient culture, east or west. Whatever the name is given is prophetic in nature. So what isaiah 7:14 says, qara shem, call his name. That phrase is directed to the mother. The mother shall call his name. To call, qara, doesnt mean to speak. It carries the sense of summoning or appointing. Think of it en English as call FOR, maybe roll call for attendance. You call a name, but it's not to be saying it, you're summoning the other person to make there presence known. Speaking is passive. Calling requires action from another party.
So appoint his name, his destiny or nature.... to hit back on this. Immanuel. With us is God.
So to me she is tasked with not naming him that specifically. But appointing over him a title representative of what his nature is reckoned to be. Again, in the old testament this seems to work as a binding prophecy. So she names him..... Yeshua. Yah is salvation. Now when you play that back on Immanuels translation you arrive at a much grander picture of what the new testament teaches in my perspective.
In my opinion. If immanuel was to be his name, the hebrew wouldve omitted the word vqarat for and you shall call altogether and simply said you shall name him.
The name immanuel isnt translated into its meaning. Several other verses have the title translated for you. In that case he should have all sorts of names.
I love the some what off the cuff
I think the 'vengeance is mine' might refer to it being reserved for Him to repay, not us. Vengeance belongs to Him kinda thing.
I often lately wonder what happen to the that malek of Yéhova of the hebrew older writings, that one ambassador that had much authority over the nations. Is is Gabriel now, the one bringing the messages to certian people in the writings of people before 70AD? Who is the malak bringing the words of Yéhova to mary, Zechariah, the shepards, peter and Joseph, even Daniel?
Nehemiah, why do you think writer of Matthew used Isaiah 7:14?
“The Protoevangelium of James” has a compelling take on the Temple legalities of the Joseph & Mary apparent controversy. Jerry Springer aint got nuttin’ on dis’.
i like this hebrew pearls series but i think you guys need to edit and cut out all of the fluff, interruptions, etc. to cut it in half.
The virgin birth issue was actually from the second century between the Netzerim and the Ebionites, Netzerim were disciples of Yeshua and the ebionites were disciples of John
Do you have any source material on this?
@@garlandjones7709 miles Jones a historian and a Linguist speaks of it in his book, “The sons of Zion vs. the sons of Greece”. Also the Ebionites were probably influenced by the sect of Judaism that opposed Paul on his spiritual interpretation of circumcision and other issues that put a breach between the Notzerim and the Rabbinic Jews. The Ebionites did not believe in the virgin birth, but believed that Yeshua inherited his title as God’s son after he was baptized by John. They had a very literal interpretation of the Torah, which in itself was credible and reasonable.But they literally throw out the book of Matthew and Paul’s teachings, as heretical, basically the Ebionites were a sect of Judaism that believed in Yeshua, probably the same type of group that opposed Paul and Barnabus. They also believed that you had to be poor to be a spiritual person, as their names Ebon, from Hebrew means poor. They probably also followers of James the leader of the Church in Jerusalem.
@@nickstrickland4751 Thanks for clarifying. Regarding Paul and circumcision i see reference to Deuteronomy 30:6 and a handful of other deuteronomic verses in light of this if that's not addressed in what youve studied. Either way, thanks again.
Yahovah our God created her and Yashuah Messiah by his holy power Spirit
I have read, prayed, & thought on this. I trust the two of y’all more than any others than YHVH, Yeho’Shua, & Ruach. Maybe myself at times.
Honestly I do not have a solid position.
The wise men followed a stare.
The costalation of the virgin.
The end time prophecies.
All of them.
I feel like something is missed.
The wisemen didn’t follow at STAR. They followed many things.
They followed Jupiter.. the planets were brighter than the other stars. Planet means BRIGHT STAR.
😢
Isn’t there an example in the tenach that foreshadows Matthew 1:18? Didnt the Spirit hover above the waters or the void? Perhaps this is the same action of the Holy Spirit by which Miriam is made to be pregnant . 🤔
You guys! I love this but dang! It's kind of a little frustrating that Nehemia never seems to get to what HE wants to cover!
My understanding until now is Yeshua was born by the seed of Joseph as promised by the prophets, that the Messiah had to be of the seed of David
I am starting to become more like the Ebonites. Slowly transitioning my view on the gospel as I become more Jewish in my views of things.
As a virgin birth denier(Joesph was/is his father just as testified) I've heard many of the same considerations as you two presented in this video. However there is another aspect which I have not heard covered which I believe is important and should be considered.
Joseph was/is of the house and lineage of David, testified by both Matthew and Luke(no mention of Mary). As such, his son is also an heir to king David's throne and establishing his authenticity is somewhat important. Certain assumptions must be clarified such as his paternity. Another question could be establishing his mother's virginity. According to the law, Deuteronomy 22:13-21, this is a capital offense if the womans parents cannot present her tokens of virginity in the presence of the elders should her husband pursue this publicly. Might this be what Joseph was considering in verse 19?
It should be noted the the Greek text of Matthew 1:18 when considering the phrase 'before they came together' is not the same meaning as Hebrew Matthew's 'knew her'. In the Greek this phrase means literally before they came together, meaning before they co-habitated, not before they knew each other or to be blunt, before they had sex.
The storyline is plain and simple. As I explained in my last comment on the Matthew 1:1-16 video, there is no problem with the counts of 14 generations IF you follow Matthew's instructions of where to begin and end each count. When this count is understood and counted correctly, Joseph is the father of Jesus as testified man times in the new testament.
In order for Jesus to be born in the fulness of time, the Holy Spirit overshadowed(influenced and led) Mary to lie with Joseph during their betrothal but before their hoppa(this is out of the ordinary but not a sin). However, her parents were unaware and did not prepare her tokens of virginity. After she was discovered to be pregnant, this presented a challenge to Joseph in his inability to prove Mary's virginity thus bringing into question Jesus' legitimacy to David's throne.
"Philip findeth Nathanael, and saith unto him, We have found him, of whom Moses in the law, and the prophets, did write, Jesus of Nazareth, the son of Joseph."
John 1:45
"And they said, Is not this Jesus, the son of Joseph, whose father and mother we know? how is it then that he saith, I came down from heaven?"
John 6:42
"Is not this the carpenter's son? is not his mother called Mary? and his brethren, James, and Joses, and Simon, and Judas?"
Matthew 13:55
"And when they saw him, they were amazed: and his mother said unto him, Son, why hast thou thus dealt with us? behold, thy father and I have sought thee sorrowing."
Luke 2:48
"That which is born of the flesh is flesh; and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit."
John 3:6
LOL
John 8:41, Jesus to pharisees, "You are doing the deeds of your father." They said to him, "We were not born of fornication; we have one Father, God". They not only imply he wasnt Joseph's son, but that he has two fathers reinforcing the fact, who he recognizes as Joseph, and who they presume to be his seed bearer. Either way, they understood Joseph wasnt his dad.
I don think you understand Genesis 48. Adopted are as natural born. Who cares if Yeshua was adoted, he was the son of Joseph.
Also Exidus 12 & 22, Leviticus 19 & 25. Do not oppress the stranger. from which the commentators get ""do not oppress/remind the convert, not even their grand children. But, remember thay are also human and as much a believer as you.
@@garlandjones7709 I refer you to Gen 48. Those rabies were violating the law of G_D. And also there own stricter law.
@@tccarr7162 im familsr with Jacobs blessings. The issue i raised was against virgin birth denial from within the text.
The idea was they knew he didnt belong to Joseph. This has nothing to do with legal statutes, but literalness vs essentially "bs" wrapped in a nice blanket about how God could be his father.
Can you please
Help me?
I want a copy of The Gospel of Matthew in Hebrew
That Barnabas (St. Paul's traveling companion) was buried with.
Barnabas's own handwritten copy that was buried with him.
You know the one The Vatican has stored away somewhere
What gospel?
From what I'm hearing, it's only like murder if the woman is engaged or married. If she is a widow. Or not a virgin from a man who had sex with her, maybe he did or didn't pay the price, but refused to marry her. If that female was raped it was not like murder.
Yahovah created the heavens and the earth by the power in his holy spirit.His power let there be light.Yahovah said so.Because he says so . Yahovah has all power and might and all things are possible with Yahovah our God what he says will happen always happens.
Hi there,
First off all thank you for sharing this.
I found one thing difficult.
The title of the teaching suggests that it will cover part of the chapter where in fact it covers almost one verse mostly.
And then you invite to plus series.
I understand that everything requires resources.
Maybe instead of producing one episode that enroles viewers for premium contents you just open up a paid course setup or collect estimated budget via kickstarter type of mechanism.
I believe it would increase the level of transparency.
Miracles done by Yahovah by his holy Spirit power.
Nehemiah Gordo GRACIAS por tu enseñanza en verdad me parece cronológicamente lógico el resultado de tus estudios. En Puebla Méxicos te espero de visita en tu próxima expedición a México.
""Mi casa es tu casa""
Cómo maestro de la RAÍZ del idioma original del compendio de libros llamados Biblia es de mucha mayor comprensión la enseñanza retirando o quitando todas las expresiones religiosas que se añadieron en su traducción a otros idiomas o versiones.
I believe that Yeshua of Nazareth is King David born again.
(Psalm 71:20)You who have made me see many troubles and calamities will revive me again; from the depths of the earth you will bring me up again.
(Psalm 30:3)O Lord, thou hast brought up my soul from the grave: thou hast kept me alive, that I should not go down to the pit.
(Psalm 118:17)-I shall not die, but live,
And declare the works of the Lord.)
(Jeremiah 30:9)- But they shall serve the Lord their God, and David their king, whom I will raise up unto them. )
(Psalm 40:70)-Then said I, Lo, I come: in the volume of the book it is written of me,)
(Hosea 3:5)- Afterward shall the children of Israel return, and seek the Lord their God, and David their king; and shall fear the Lord and his goodness in the latter days.)
(Ezekiel 34:23)- And I will set up one shepherd over them, and he shall feed them, even my servant David; he shall feed them, and he shall be their shepherd.)
(Ezekiel 37:24) -And David my servant shall be king over them; and they all shall have one shepherd: they shall also walk in my judgments, and observe my statutes, and do them.)
(John 10:16) - And other sheep I have, which are not of this fold: them also I must bring, and they shall hear my voice; and there shall be one fold, and one shepherd.)
(Psalm 41:9-10) - Yea, mine own familiar friend, in whom I trusted, which did eat of my bread, hath lifted up his heel against me.
But thou, O Lord, be merciful unto me, and raise me up, that I may requite them.)
(John 13:18)- “I do not speak concerning all of you. I know whom I have chosen; but that the Scripture may be fulfilled, ‘He who eats [c]bread with Me has lifted up his heel against Me.’ 19 Now I tell you before it comes, that when it does come to pass, you may believe that I am HE.)
Abel is reincarnated into Yeshua, that is why Yeshua used to say " the Son of Adam
Abel is also reincarnated into Moshe ( Moses)
@@mathWisdom408 interesting. You have some scriptures?
@@GarmentofEsau you'll find no scriptures on reincarnations like that. Jesus makes the abel parallel. Kf you take Paul into account hes Adam too. If you take John into account hes Isaac. Jews say hes Joseph, both then and now. The reality is all of those serve as anticipatory types of what to expect from him. Hes not all of them rolled up into one.
According to David hed have to be Solomon. According to Moses hed have to be Joshua. I can run this list out for hours. At the second coming hes Joshua and Noah both before he ever exists as zdavid. Not being David is why Jews didnt accept him.
The bible teaches reincarnation. But at a set appointed time in history. Not reentry immediately upon death.
Yeshua also made himself to be Elijah. He made ALL believers to be Elisha. Paul did the same I THINK in the Elsisha sense, but I cant think of a specific verse off hand.
Theres a scholar I have a work from that lost his entire faith over the Elijah/Elisha narrative. Without reading his work on that specific subject, I wonder if he even caught the rest of them.
@@garlandjones7709 being Born again is very clear throughout the Bible to those who are Torah centric. That is why the sages of Israel have believed a man can be born again through his widows womb(Deuteronomy25). It's a key concept to understand the El of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. The El who visits the sin of the the fathers upon the children. By no means leaving the fathers unpunished.
Deuteronomy 32:39 ‘Now see that I, even I, am He,
And there is no God besides Me;
I kill and I make alive;
I wound and I heal;
Nor is there any who can deliver from My hand.
Exodus 34:7 keeping mercy for thousands, forgiving iniquity and transgression and sin, by no means clearing the guilty, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children and the children’s children to the third and the fourth generation.”
Sanhidrin 91B Our Rabbis taught: I kill, and I make alive. I might interpret, I kill one person and give life to another, as the world goes on: therefore the Writ states, I wound, and I heal. Just as the wounding and healing [obviously] refer to the same person, so putting to death and bringing to life refer to the same person. This refutes those who maintain that resurrection is not intimated in the Torah.
Rava raises a contradiction. It is written: “I will kill and I will bring to life” (Deuteronomy 32:39), indicating that God is capable of reviving the dead. And it is written immediately afterward: “I wounded and I will heal,” which indicates that God will only heal the wounded. Rather, it should be understood: The Holy One, Blessed be He, is saying: What I kill, I bring to life, indicating that God revives the dead. And then what I wounded, I will heal.
You don’t need to convert to Christianity, you need to make Yeshua HaMeshiyach your Lord, Master, Saviour, Great God Almighty YeHoVaH at the right hand of YeHoVaH and worship him in spirit and truth and obey the Gospel of Yeshua HaMeshiyach.
This makes no sense to me if they found Mary with child or expecting but the Angel spoke to a VIRGIN Mary and said you will have a child and she never knew a man why would God pick a woman who is about to have sex with a random man who she never married (because Joseph) didn't want to bring her shame by devorce but was hiding her that would be to say that Mary did not have sex with Joseph and was pregnant to another random person by your stating that the Spirit FOUND her pregnant this is Blasphemy... She was clearly a virgin who was given the child of God by his spirit as the Angel said she would have a child and it will be called Yeshua for he will save and so on.
I struggle to grasp why you would do this as well, but it the root is not understanding Yeshua as yhvh/"god" and just a messianic man. That's where this is coming from whether or not its apparent in just this video alone.
IESOUS' conception: Iehovah did not violate His own law (I think NG is being silly or other). The result of Mary being pregnant is the result of God's power of the holy spirit of transferring Iesous' life directly into her womb. Furthermore God used the covered relationship between Mary and Joseph to protect this miraculous birth of Yeshua to avoid any hint of violation of the law.
Is NG dipping?
Why doesn't Keith Johnson pray in Jesus' name or ends prayer in our Lord's name (John 14:13-14)? Keith claims to be Christian.
Keith, your question about what "from the Holy Spirit" means is rather a non-requiter. It is not a curve ball. The Holy Spirit was the "instrument" as you put it. The Holy Spirit would not have to "discover" that Miriam was pregnant. He already knew that. Sorry, but that really is an errant question. The only way to understand this is that the Holy Spirit was the source (not in a physical seed way) of her becoming pregnant. It really is very simple!
How did Jesus called himself or his head apostel according to scripture:
Acts 2:22 Ye men of Israel, hear these words; Jesus of Nazareth; For we have heard him say, that this Jesus of Nazareth shall destroy this place, and shall change the customs which Moses delivered us.
Acts 6:14 For we have heard him say, that this Jesus of Nazareth shall destroy ......
Acts 22:8 And I answered, Who art thou, Lord? And he said unto me, I am Jesus of Nazareth, whom thou persecutest.;
So why is the first line of the Hebrew Matthew anti Christ by some
religious people? While in acts Jesus calls himself by his Jewish name ?
Matthew 24:5 For many shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and shall deceive many. Logically i read inspirated by acts, For many shall come in my name(Jesus of Nazareth ), saying, I am Christ(Messiah); But thats to anybody to decide.
IF THERE WAS NOT A 3RD PERSON HS THEN ONE WOULD HAVE TO BELIEVE THE TRADITIONS OF OUR FATHERS, WHICH TAKES GREAT FAITH AND TRUST. SO IF NO 3RD PERSON HS THEN WHO WOULD THEY BLAME? FOR MARYS BEING PREGNANT?
THEN THEIR PLACING A 3RD PERSON HS HERE ACCOUNTS FOR KEEPING BELIEVERS FROM TORAH. THANKS MARCION AND CONSTANTINE!
Or “she was found pregnant FROM (the power or work of power of the Holy Spirit).
There's no adultery or fornication on a artificial insemination, which is basically what happens to Mary, she was the first woman virgin or not, that is mentioned by name to be pregnant by an artificial mean, the other women are mentioned in a general way in genesis 6. So artificial insemination is not a form of adultery or fornication
Its simple.