Part of the reason why is because how significantly more dangerous it is for the passengers... Not when it comes to travel but when it comes to trafficking, we're essentially cargo ready to be airdropped at any moment a lot more safety precautions would need to be involved and it would be super expensive. As well as the technological advances were already trying to find better means of traveling anyways.
The reason parachutes (in any configuration) is not used for commercial jets, is because about 90% of all accidents happen during takeoff and landing when the plane is mostly too low for parachutes to be effective. Also detaching part of the plane and landing it using gigantic parachutes is pretty sketchy, the military sometimes airdrop supplies, equipment and even cars (without people in them) but even in ideal conditions they quite often fail to deploy and even when they deploy they slam into the ground at bone breaking speeds. This whole idea is some engineer fantasy rather than a something seriously considered. Conventional individual parachutes for each passenger is also problematic, because even if everyone were already strapped in to their parachutes and fully trained for solo drops, it's not possible to open the doors of a commercial jet when it's high up because the doors are plugged shut by the pressure difference, and by the time you have descended to a level where the doors will open, you're probably too low to parachute anyway, and you would need a lot of time to get every passenger through the back doors. But passengers are not generally proffessional sky divers so they would probably die at a much higher rate if they tried to jump than if the pilots simply make an emergency landing. Also nobody would like to spend multiple hours in a jumpsuit strapped into a parachute every flight.
In my opinion it has a problem, so when the passenger fuselage detachs its gonna change the center of mass by a lot which will make the plane really unstable and that means the pilots won't have a chance, also fitting parachutes that can slow down that fuselage I a small space is hard and under a lot of stress the parachutes will tear apart so they shouldn't really do it.
This concept has many huge issues with it. First, when the fussalage detaches, it messes up the center of mass, which would cause the plane to nosedive, just like in the game. Second, the costs of outfiting every plane with parachutes would be very high. They also might add more weight to the plane, which may increase fuel costs. Third, there would be less space in the fuselage. Fourth, airplane accidents are very rare, so this would be very overkill. Fifth, the pilots wouldn't survive the plane crash. Sixth, if the plane is on fire, this system probably wouldnt help anything, and might even make it worse. Seventh, the fuselage would have no way to slow down enough so that the parachutes could deploy. Eighth, the fuselage is very heavy, so the parachutes would have to be very large, or there would have to be more of them. Also, the maintenance costs would be very high for this system, and there may be malfunctions. Parachutes are only practical in small planes, like the cirrus sr-22.
There's dome reasons the detachable passenger cabin isn't implemented: - Adds construction and maintenance costs and weight, also increasing the fuel consumption, also increasing costs (ultimately, increasing plane ticket costs) - Incidents, in which that system would be effective, are too scarce to justify the increased costs. - That system may change the mentally of some pilots from "save the plane and passengers" to "drop the passengers and crash the plane" - In engine failure situations, planes can still glide and try a landing. - Dropping the passenger cabin may drasticaly change the aerodynamics and weight distribution of the plane.
it probably would not help cause the detached crew cabin has very little redundancy and also the people in the cockpit would also not survive when a plane crashes it is possible people survive while if the contraption malfunctioned the chance is a lot smaller and it would reduce the structural stability of the aircraft most likely causing more crashes and the idea is only useful when the cabin is level finally it is not cost effective and not reliable
the second it’s windy, the cabin will become a sailboat. Edit: oh yeah, they should ad a roof hatch so you can shoot a flare gun out. If not thennn.. sad day.
Commercial airlines haven’t done something like this because replacing their whole fleet would cost billions, and all the new weight and moving parts added by a system like this would lose them money on maintenance and fuel cost. Instead of doing that, cleaning up a plane crash every few years only costs a few million, and half the time they can convince the government to foot the bill.
They dont do this because 1 its heavy 2 the pilots will die and 3 planes dont crash often and most airliners can fly with 1 engine its just so unnecessary
I honestly prefer the console version to PC but it just sucks how limited I am in the complexity limit. Can make some nice builds still but I always have more I wanna add
Airlines never adopted the ejector plane because it had a very heavy fuselage and ejection system which led to less effeciency and more fuel costs. This combined with the smaller total passenger count made the plane very unattractive to airlines. (why have safety when you can have $?)
wow I think this is your most interestingest ever video.also I have a suggestion how about you do a tandem build with YZEI or KAN which ever person you want to build with you and I'd really like it if you build a F15E cooperative build and for the readers reading this comment plz like so corndogs can do it I already know he read this before but still I'd like it if he did build it😊😊😊bye
This concept is not used, 1st I think it is expensive to prepare and maintain the system and 2nd there is no technology to create a parachute that can withstand the weight of a commercial airplane. There are cases of small planes that have this system to save the plane completely.
I would love if airplanes had that feature, but I would not pay extra for it. Before you spend money on a safety feature you need to ask yourself three questions: 1. Is the activity dangerous enough to warrant safety measures of any kind? 2. Is the cost of the safety measure commensurate with the increase in safety it will provide? 3. Is there better and/or cheaper alternative. The answer for these is no. 1. Flying is simply not that dangerous. There is one commercial plane crash for every 16.7 million commercial flights. 2. As we know flying isn’t that dangerous, and the vast preponderance of air accidents occur during take off, or landing, or result in an explosion of the entire plane. So on the most common use-case scenarios, your device will be of no benefit whatsoever. 3. Planes could be made MORE safe than your safety measure would allow, for much less. Stricter pilot screening, for drugs, better training, more thorough examinations etc. By comparison seatbelts cost a tiny fraction of what that device would and save lives almost daily. Typically half the people that die in a car crash were not wearing seat belts. Nonetheless though, a very entertaining video.
So with the cabin ejection idea I don’t think it is reliable not just because of cost and complexity but also because of many other things like how it could cause a lot more structural failures due to most the plane being almost detached and connecting all the fuel electrical and hydraulic lines through the plane would be difficult also the system is not very redundant the smallest thing could cause a smaller failure to become catastrophic another thing is the system would not allow for the people in the cockpit to survive due to the plane being very unstable after losing the entire cabin There is different reasons to the ejection seats to not including the cost some ejection seats take up a lot of room and also planes cruise at a very high altitude higher than safe limits which is why planes don’t have parachutes along with the fact the air at that altitude is to thin to breath so airlines would also need to give people oxygen also ejection seats like in fighter jets would melt the person behind them and have a chance of give the person ejecting serious injuries
It would be to hard to get company’s to want to switch all their planes to it because it would end up costing them billions for like one of their jets crashing so it wouldn’t be cost effective and Boeing and Airbus wouldn’t waste the money
Additional points of failure that are completely unnecessary. Planes have so many redundancies as it is, a detachable cabin just makes no sense. Not to mention, what’s going to prevent the cabin from spiraling out of control anyway? Either you’re going to have to engineer up some overly complicated safety measures to ensure safe ejection, decent & landing or you’re going to have to add a secondary control module, which the crew will be required to be trained on as well. Not all ideas are good ones lol
Just emagine the pilot is crazy and wants to oof all the passengers soo he cuts the parachute on ground and oofs them… yeah thats why they dont do it and its stupid
congrats on 5k!
Thank you BROOO!
@@LittleCornDogsGaming what about the pilots they will die
@@vijaybathini4440parachute
@@vijaybathini4440also the pilots don’t matter
The pilots do matter because these pilots are not common to come upon
"it looks a little shaky"
The plane is nervous cause it knows what's going to happen.
It knows it’s head is falling off lol
Imagine being on a plane chilling and you start falling
😂
Imagine not falling down but falling up. That would be scary.
Part of the reason why is because how significantly more dangerous it is for the passengers... Not when it comes to travel but when it comes to trafficking, we're essentially cargo ready to be airdropped at any moment a lot more safety precautions would need to be involved and it would be super expensive. As well as the technological advances were already trying to find better means of traveling anyways.
As an avgeek this is true
and the pilots will die because it might be a engine failure crash
0:10 never forget that day, also so close to 5k I bet you’re gonna get it today probably
Edit:Congrats on 5k
The reason parachutes (in any configuration) is not used for commercial jets, is because about 90% of all accidents happen during takeoff and landing when the plane is mostly too low for parachutes to be effective. Also detaching part of the plane and landing it using gigantic parachutes is pretty sketchy, the military sometimes airdrop supplies, equipment and even cars (without people in them) but even in ideal conditions they quite often fail to deploy and even when they deploy they slam into the ground at bone breaking speeds. This whole idea is some engineer fantasy rather than a something seriously considered.
Conventional individual parachutes for each passenger is also problematic, because even if everyone were already strapped in to their parachutes and fully trained for solo drops, it's not possible to open the doors of a commercial jet when it's high up because the doors are plugged shut by the pressure difference, and by the time you have descended to a level where the doors will open, you're probably too low to parachute anyway, and you would need a lot of time to get every passenger through the back doors.
But passengers are not generally proffessional sky divers so they would probably die at a much higher rate if they tried to jump than if the pilots simply make an emergency landing. Also nobody would like to spend multiple hours in a jumpsuit strapped into a parachute every flight.
What happens to an airplane if one of the engines goes out? - Delays and more work for the pilots, the airline,... But no usually nothing bad happens
Hey so close to 5k hope you make it soon!
I hope so too! Thank you!
The passengers: *happe happee haaaaappppeeeeeee*
The pilot: 💀💀💀
In my opinion it has a problem, so when the passenger fuselage detachs its gonna change the center of mass by a lot which will make the plane really unstable and that means the pilots won't have a chance, also fitting parachutes that can slow down that fuselage I a small space is hard and under a lot of stress the parachutes will tear apart so they shouldn't really do it.
true i agree
Little corn dogs is under rated
Plz
👇
Mate you… have just given me a BRILLIANT IDEA.
Ayyyyy noice!
What about the pilot?
As an airline mechanic this would be a nightmare to maintain let alone make it flyable.
The reason they do t have these is because the odds of something happening to one of the mechanisms is far greater than the plane crashing alone
This concept has many huge issues with it. First, when the fussalage detaches, it messes up the center of mass, which would cause the plane to nosedive, just like in the game. Second, the costs of outfiting every plane with parachutes would be very high. They also might add more weight to the plane, which may increase fuel costs. Third, there would be less space in the fuselage. Fourth, airplane accidents are very rare, so this would be very overkill. Fifth, the pilots wouldn't survive the plane crash. Sixth, if the plane is on fire, this system probably wouldnt help anything, and might even make it worse. Seventh, the fuselage would have no way to slow down enough so that the parachutes could deploy. Eighth, the fuselage is very heavy, so the parachutes would have to be very large, or there would have to be more of them. Also, the maintenance costs would be very high for this system, and there may be malfunctions. Parachutes are only practical in small planes, like the cirrus sr-22.
Fair point
There's dome reasons the detachable passenger cabin isn't implemented:
- Adds construction and maintenance costs and weight, also increasing the fuel consumption, also increasing costs (ultimately, increasing plane ticket costs)
- Incidents, in which that system would be effective, are too scarce to justify the increased costs.
- That system may change the mentally of some pilots from "save the plane and passengers" to "drop the passengers and crash the plane"
- In engine failure situations, planes can still glide and try a landing.
- Dropping the passenger cabin may drasticaly change the aerodynamics and weight distribution of the plane.
Worst case scenario: The parachutes and the cushions malfunction
They just don't care
Since only 1/21,000,000 planes crashed its not practical.
it probably would not help cause the detached crew cabin has very little redundancy and also the people in the cockpit would also not survive when a plane crashes it is possible people survive while if the contraption malfunctioned the chance is a lot smaller and it would reduce the structural stability of the aircraft most likely causing more crashes and the idea is only useful when the cabin is level finally it is not cost effective and not reliable
A reason why they haven't implemented this system is because if they did, passenger's would think that failures would occur a lot
its a very impractical deisgn to say the least but good job building it since i couldnt have
there are problems whit the weight on the attachments when the plane goes up
This is cool and all, but what happens to the pilots? Anyone know if the original idea this was based on had anything for the pilots?
I thought the same but I think they’d go into the back when there’s no hope left lol
like a pirate. you go down with the ship LOL
a better idea would that the wings fall off and the fuselage has a parachute so even the pilot gets saved
and it would be safer
co-pilot: what will we do? pilot: theres nothing we can do...
Hahaha
The thing that you doing right now has been done before but it was never released
Man I’d love to see it irl
if 1 engine fails its not even an emergency mist planes fly with only 1 engine for feul efficiency and if it has 4 engine only 2 i use
Yo could you also upload them when you build cool things!!!!
the second it’s windy, the cabin will become a sailboat.
Edit: oh yeah, they should ad a roof hatch so you can shoot a flare gun out. If not thennn.. sad day.
Commercial airlines haven’t done something like this because replacing their whole fleet would cost billions, and all the new weight and moving parts added by a system like this would lose them money on maintenance and fuel cost. Instead of doing that, cleaning up a plane crash every few years only costs a few million, and half the time they can convince the government to foot the bill.
It would be a structural nightmare that might cause more issues than it fixes.
The reason I piney trailmakers is because you can do almost anything
most airplane cashses happen at landing or takeoff
I would have made this if I had airborne add on so I could get other parts to build this
Ahhhh right! Yeah man it’s worth it if you want to improve your builds
They dont do this because 1 its heavy 2 the pilots will die and 3 planes dont crash often and most airliners can fly with 1 engine its just so unnecessary
WHAT ABOUT THE PIOLAT?
I honestly prefer the console version to PC but it just sucks how limited I am in the complexity limit. Can make some nice builds still but I always have more I wanna add
Airlines never adopted the ejector plane because it had a very heavy fuselage and ejection system which led to less effeciency and more fuel costs. This combined with the smaller total passenger count made the plane very unattractive to airlines. (why have safety when you can have $?)
I'm not going to bother to remind you about the eagle 5 anymore, but I hope you do make it
I will it sound like a great vid idea
The system is to heavy so they can not put it on a plane but it would e a good mechanism though
Is it on workshop
I’m not sure you’ll have to check my steam I’m sure I did
If something happens while it is falling the pilot can not control it
You forgot about the pilots murderer😂😂😅
Looool they’re fiiiine
Rip pilots😢😢
Its unessasary because planes can glide even without both engines
What about the pilots?
yes
I’m new and I like corn, dogs and corn dogs
Heck yeah!
wow I think this is your most interestingest ever video.also I have a suggestion how about you do a tandem build with YZEI or KAN which ever person you want to build with you and I'd really like it if you build a F15E cooperative build and for the readers reading this comment plz like so corndogs can do it I already know he read this before but still I'd like it if he did build it😊😊😊bye
Thank you so much and That sounds really fun!
This concept is not used, 1st I think it is expensive to prepare and maintain the system and 2nd there is no technology to create a parachute that can withstand the weight of a commercial airplane.
There are cases of small planes that have this system to save the plane completely.
What if the coupling fails mid flight. That just kills people.
I would love if airplanes had that feature, but I would not pay extra for it.
Before you spend money on a safety feature you need to ask yourself three questions:
1. Is the activity dangerous enough to warrant safety measures of any kind?
2. Is the cost of the safety measure commensurate with the increase in safety it will provide?
3. Is there better and/or cheaper alternative.
The answer for these is no.
1. Flying is simply not that dangerous. There is one commercial plane crash for every 16.7 million commercial flights.
2. As we know flying isn’t that dangerous, and the vast preponderance of air accidents occur during take off, or landing, or result in an explosion of the entire plane. So on the most common use-case scenarios, your device will be of no benefit whatsoever.
3. Planes could be made MORE safe than your safety measure would allow, for much less. Stricter pilot screening, for drugs, better training, more thorough examinations etc.
By comparison seatbelts cost a tiny fraction of what that device would and save lives almost daily. Typically half the people that die in a car crash were not wearing seat belts.
Nonetheless though, a very entertaining video.
What about the pilot
the pilot:well...I think im in danger AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH
*Plane crashed in a mountain*
😂
Airplane companies could do this but after the passenger part of the plane is off the plane is uncontrollable, so the pilots will simply die:/
the pilot 💀
More entertaining than Kwebbelkop ai
Hey I’ll take it lol 😂
@@LittleCornDogsGaminglol ur welcome bro keep it up
So with the cabin ejection idea I don’t think it is reliable not just because of cost and complexity but also because of many other things like how it could cause a lot more structural failures due to most the plane being almost detached and connecting all the fuel electrical and hydraulic lines through the plane would be difficult also the system is not very redundant the smallest thing could cause a smaller failure to become catastrophic another thing is the system would not allow for the people in the cockpit to survive due to the plane being very unstable after losing the entire cabin
There is different reasons to the ejection seats to not including the cost some ejection seats take up a lot of room and also planes cruise at a very high altitude higher than safe limits which is why planes don’t have parachutes along with the fact the air at that altitude is to thin to breath so airlines would also need to give people oxygen also ejection seats like in fighter jets would melt the person behind them and have a chance of give the person ejecting serious injuries
What about the pilots
here's why planes don't have this: It is too heavy plus it is mostly not possible to make it due to complexity
Pilots on there own we don't care💀
lol
The winds are down, silky. And do not work that way
Not peactical the detaching of the cabin would be from the cockpit and the pilots would kill themself if they would do it because of the weight change
It would be to hard to get company’s to want to switch all their planes to it because it would end up costing them billions for like one of their jets crashing so it wouldn’t be cost effective and Boeing and Airbus wouldn’t waste the money
Additional points of failure that are completely unnecessary. Planes have so many redundancies as it is, a detachable cabin just makes no sense. Not to mention, what’s going to prevent the cabin from spiraling out of control anyway? Either you’re going to have to engineer up some overly complicated safety measures to ensure safe ejection, decent & landing or you’re going to have to add a secondary control module, which the crew will be required to be trained on as well. Not all ideas are good ones lol
Just emagine the pilot is crazy and wants to oof all the passengers soo he cuts the parachute on ground and oofs them… yeah thats why they dont do it and its stupid
JUST USE SAILS AS PARACHUTES
They so big
@@LittleCornDogsGaming I know, and so is the plane
@@LittleCornDogsGaming it ain't that hard, I did it so you can to
@@Tristanc213 when they believe in you 🥹 lol
Pilots💀
Lol
Bro the pilot is dead
5th hehe also this is very cool
Noothing of that its to heavy
UwU
First
The pilots are dead
make it a boat