We do not see the hand of the libero clearly. If ball was set by his knuckles, play is legal. If ball was set by his fingers, not a legal play and R1 should have whistled for a back row attack fault.
Libero action can not be considered set because it is a reflex defensive reaction (possibly played also with knuckles) and there is no clear setting action. However, nowhere menitoned carry on the third (attacking) touch is a big issue.
Oh boy. The set was not a set, above the need contact inside the attack line, he forgot he was in the libero jersey, the mishit was an attempt to play over in 2. Not legal. Up ref is about to hear about it lol
Y'all are trippin. Illegal set. His foot is on the line as he jumps
We do not see the hand of the libero clearly. If ball was set by his knuckles, play is legal. If ball was set by his fingers, not a legal play and R1 should have whistled for a back row attack fault.
It is not a set rather a uphand bump with knuckles with foot over the 3 m line, therefore no illegal attack was called
Libero action can not be considered set because it is a reflex defensive reaction (possibly played also with knuckles) and there is no clear setting action. However, nowhere menitoned carry on the third (attacking) touch is a big issue.
We don't know how the lib played the ball. The film quality is poor.
no whistle means good
I'd actually call that attack as a "catch" too.... So R1 is very loyal =)
Libero hopped from back row to front to set so the hitter can totally hit it.
Oh boy. The set was not a set, above the need contact inside the attack line, he forgot he was in the libero jersey, the mishit was an attempt to play over in 2. Not legal. Up ref is about to hear about it lol