Remote ID. The FAA V EASA: How To Do Things Differently.
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 20 окт 2024
- Subscribe to The Fly-By Guys RUclips: / stippidoo
Flyby Guys Merch: www.flybyguys....
The Fly-By Guys are a drone company, based in Helsinki, Finland.
Stephen is also Vice President of the World UAV Federation, and an advocate for drone safety in Finland.
Contact us for more information at hello@flybyguys.com
Visit our website: www.flybyguys.com
Subscribe to the Fly-By Guys
Follow us on Facebook: / theflybyguys
Follow us on LinkedIn: / the-. .
Follow us on Instagram: / flybyguys
Music by The Fly-By Guys
#mini3pro #mini4pro #remoteid
Interesting video, but in my opinion, you are considering it only from your point of view (not saying it is wrong, just that the problem is broader than that).
As mentioned in other comments, FPV drones get a big hit with that. Considering that the average FPV hobbyist has around 5-10 self-built drones, you are looking at a ~500-1000 USD/EUR "tax" if you want to do everything legally. Plus add another 100 if you crash your drone.
Another thing to consider is that this whole system has been designed to be flawed from the ground up.
The laws state that this is about security and safety, but they do not consider that if someone has bad intentions, they will not comply with remote ID.
It's like thinking that criminals doing a bank robbery will show up without a mask and without a gun because they don't have a gun license.
And about the "social issues" you mentioned, I am a European citizen, and I've flown to different countries in Europe, and yes, I found bad people who harassed me (even if flying an almost silent DJI mini 3), and a hunter who shot my drone. Probably, he did it because he thought I was spying on him doing some illegal hunting, but why don't we also enforce a device on every hunting rifle?
Yes complying is easier and easier, you are right, and I will comply for all the flights I need to do for work.
But this does not make sense; the security argument is just plain bs, and I am aware that complying with this will erode another small piece of freedom.
I don't know. I've seen so many law changes in the past, and now, every time they say "it's for security and safety", to me, it smells like control-freak-government-approved propaganda.
I totally agree. Well, you are wrong. It's well known that people who want to break the law make themselves identifiable. In fact, those who carry out bank robberies do not use stolen cars, but personal ones so as not to break the law and be identifiable. Never be. 🤣 If an attacker wants to steal my drone, he now also knows where I'm flying from. A bit like putting the home address on the license plate of the car. Very safe.
He spoke about security... you know... putting a 2.4Ghz device on another 2.4Ghz RX (ELRS) you know, it's very secure! The story of interference is a conspiracy. It doesn't exist. And who cares that a drone falls then because it loses the signal due the interferences. It's safer! Or you have delays in the transmission going to crash against houses, cars or people. He flies with drones.. wait... to say that he flies is too much because the drones he uses fly automatically.
In the United States, my quad has a right to remain silent! Anything that it says or does, can and will be used against me in a court of law!
Ok
Good to have a voice of reason like you Stephen on the internet. Totally agree with you!
Thanks Roger. The truth should never be applauded, but I agree.
This is not an issue for dji pilots, but for fpv ones. With dji this stuff comes integrated into the drones, but for building it yourself you look at an additional part that costs 100 bucks, which depending on what kind of dorne you buy, can add 50% of the cost to that drone. Especially considering how often you can crash an fpv drone, this shit is pretty expensive. Replacing a prop is less than a buck, i'm honestly considering just not doing that shit.
Flying drones is an expensive hobby, and the more popular it becomes, the authorities will clamp down on safety.
FPV pilots are more aware of the regulations and know the risks more than others, and I do agree, FPV pilots are getting a hard time through RID.
If DJI brought out a new piece of kit that makes you fly better or better video, you wouldn’t hesitate to buy it, but it the FAA requires you to buy something, then no 😂 If you know what I mean.
Drones are expensive. This is a fact of life.
@@FlybyGuys No wait. To say that flying a drone is expensive dignifies that you don't know this world and you only know how to fly with DJI drones. Don't talk about worlds you don't know because with $70 you can buy a funny 3" FPV drone. Add an additional $55 for the RC and $70 for the VR and you can fly! For less than 200 dollars!!!
The beacon costs more than the drone itself!
If you're used to having money stolen by DJI and not even having fun having a drone flying alone, it doesn't mean that others are willing too.
You don't know anything about drones... shut up and don't say nonsense. Because in this video you show that you don't know the world of drones other than the DJI one.
"If DJI brought out a new piece of kit that makes you fly better or better video, you wouldn’t hesitate to buy it,"
WHY? This is totally not true! Maybe it works for you DJI fan boy. I USE ANALOG AS WELL!
Not only the crashing and extra cost is an issue, but also the extra weight of the device, which is going to reduce the battery life of self built FPV drones (which can be as little as 3 minutes of flight time without the module) even further.
Good information Stephen
Thanks Lyn✌🏻😊
Hi Steven, I’m down here in Australia and I’m planning a trip next year to the UK, EU and Iceland. I have M3P and plan on picking up a Mini 4 as well. Just wondering if you can point me in the right direction as far as any potential certification I will need etc so I can get this all sorted before I head off. Cheers mate and keep up the informative content, I really enjoy it.
Thank you Craig. I’ll put a link for courses you can take. Give me a day or so.
Thanks.
@@FlybyGuys thanks so much mate, really appreciated.
Nice sharing 😎🤝
Hi Steven, Unfortunately im in the US, but I still don't plan on registering. I have a different option for R ID, but for right now I plan on flying as a Hobbyist. 250gm or less, I have just the same fun flying in the parks, through the trees, I could go on for a hour or more talking about R ID, but I don't think that the FAA has the man power to enforce the rules, and in a couple of years, im hoping that it will be removed. Thanks for your video.
Hi John. Thanks for the comment.
I think the drone community in the US seem to think that RID is an FAA thing, out to get drone users and sting them. (Just how I see it from over the pond)
RID will be a global implementation. No political, not big brother watching.
The more kick back the US does, the harder the FAA will clamp down.
Here in the EU, it will start, and then it will just be part of normal flying.
I wish the people in America only had this issue to worry about, but the level of misinformation is laughable, but at the same time, not surprising.
At a recent FAA livestream, I was shocked at the behavior of the drone community towards the people online. It’s fine if you don’t agree, this is a democracy, but to be insulting and disrespectful towards these people was embarrassing.
Some people need to look in the mirror and deal with the facts.
Thanks John. Much appreciate your comment. Fly safe 😊✌🏻
So basically you think that it's ok if government puts everybodys personal contact information in the internet (including social security numbers) etc. You just acknowledge that it's a social issue if somebody uses that information for illegal things. You don't see putting the information easily available as problematic. Let's also remove all the speed limits from public roads. It's just a social issue if somebody drives recklessly. The actual problem is not the lack of speed limits so we don't have to care about that matter.
Personally I oppose the remote ID. My drone have been shot with a shotgun for no reason in Finland. I don't want that kind of people to know my location.
Where in the internet is your details?
@@FlybyGuys You missed the point. I critized your faulty logic with an example
@@jonnanieminen8848 no. I asked you where is your data? Easily available where?
@@FlybyGuys I never said that my data is available
@@jonnanieminen8848 You stated that if think it’s ok that the government puts everyone contact details including social security numbers in the internet.
Can you give me evidence of this?
Finnish law clearly states that no data is available. Traficom do not have our data available publicly, and do not plan to do so. I asked them.
So please tell me your source of information with online personal information. I’m clearing up misinformation on this subject, which is rampant at the moment.
Kiitos.
Hello, you're right. Thank you !
Thank you
Network ID might be used for situational awereness for other airspace users, but how about local ID?
U-Space is where NID will be more useful. Cities with a lot of urban unmanned traffic will eventually (don’t hold your breath) will use U-Space.
DRID is just for standard drone users in the Open Category.
Remote ID? When the FAA is compliant with the Bill of Rights, I might consider complying with the FAA!
Can you explain this in more detail please?
Drone usage is not politicized in my region, so I find this a lame excuse.
@@FlybyGuys It's not about politics, it's about LAW! Those that do not live in a free country, have a hard time understanding what an inalienable right is, that's why it sounds lame to you. It is my position that, in the United States, a government agency, whether in public or not, cannot force a citizen to wave their constitutionally protected rights (1st, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th, 9th, 10th Amendments) and submit to, without probable cause and/ or a 4th Amendment warrant, government tracking, surveillance, and control of a citizens private movements while enjoying a business or hobby, all while collecting and recording evidence that can, and will be used against a citizen in any FAA prosecution against them. And, in most cases, forcing a citizen to pay for the surveillance equipment that will be used against them. Remote ID, is a clear violation of the Bill of Rights, and I will not acquiesce to the FAA pretended authority! Remote ID also mirrors the sixth plank of the communist manifesto. God Bless.
@@ghettogardens1 How do you know it will be used against you? (I don’t wear a tinfoil hat) I would like to see evidence of this claim. I’ve seen and heard a lot, but nobody has been able to show me anything. Wild claims.
But please, enlighten me.
@@FlybyGuys I'll bite! The FAA claims, that the information can and will be used by law enforcement, but you knew that already. At this time, the enforcement of RID is on hold. Like RDQ’s law suit, your question is premature. Until the FAA attempts to enforce the RID rule, nobody has suffered a damaged, including myself. Without a damage, there is no issue in controversy, without an issue in controversy, there is no cause of action. The fun starts when the rule is enforced, not before. It is my legal position, that when the RID rule is enforced, and enforced on me, it will be in violation of my constitutionally protected rights. I only obey constitutional laws! And then, only constitutional laws that pertain to me! As applied to me, Remote ID is clearly unconstitutional. Hold on to your seat belt, the constitutional legal challenges are on their way!
Those who already walk submissively, will always say there is no cause for alarm! Good luck!
"When rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them." Miranda vs. Arizona, 384 US 436 p. 491.
"An unconstitutional act is not law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed." Norton vs. Shelby County 118 US 425 p. 442
We already have yearly mandotory subscribtion for flying 35€ a year to register pilot and to be allowed to fly. So pay to fly is already reality.
Do you think it’s unfair to pay a yearly fee? All other aviation hobby sectors pay a yearly fee, and a lot more.
Hobbies can be expensive, club memberships and others.
Model RC clubs must pay, or they cannot fly. I think the drone community gets if easily. Just my opinion. Thank you for yours 😊✌🏻
@@FlybyGuys I actually do believe it is unfair. Nobody owns the air these drones are flying in. Nobody but you owns the drone or its controller. Why should I pay anyone else to fly my drone? The feds didnt do anything for me to make it possible. This is only my accomplishment so I shouldnt be paying anyone else for that.