Pretty good performance for a small engine in a not so small car. Also, it's interesting that the consumption increases linear to the speed of the engine (and the car), while small turbo engines are exceptionally economical at lower speeds, but then dramatically increase as you go past 130 km/h
60-100 in 5 seconds flat is actually very respectable for the engine/car weight ratio. 0-150kph in 20 seconds as well. f.e. those figures are very comparable to a ~150kg lighter fiesta 1.0 125hp. the gearbox ratios fit nicely to the engine, its rare to see this nowadays. still the consumption is very good too. i like it. its no performance car but seems to be a very usable power delivery for everyday driving.
Had this car as a renter for 3 days. My first modern day car that I drove for almost 1000 kilometres. Tragic. You need to floor it to get it moving. Sound insulation absolutely terrible, very noisy inside. Good thing was the fuel economy in motorway, but my 20 year old diesel Volvo estate has the same fuel economy, almost twice the power and is way quieter in the cabin. Guess I'll need to maintain it for as long as possible
I had this car for 11 months and sold it. I don't know why I bought it in the first place. It was such a bad idea. This car is an absolute piece of s**t. Will never again buy a tOYOTA.
This car with this engine is the best investment in this turbo age. It will last a long time, if maintained properly, and the fuel consumption is stellar. It's better that my 1.6 NA Yamaha designed MK3 Focus which has 274 K km. The hybrids are good also, but disposable after 10 years when battery warranty expires.
Ese motor es el mismo que usa el yaris, en españa el corolla solo se vende motor 1.8 híbrido para la version 4 puertas, para el corolla sw, 2.0 hibrido.
I have never seen/knew a corolla with the 1.5 from the Yaris. That’s kinda interesting, I wish that Toyota could sell some only petrol variants of their cars.
first Toyota which consume relative normal-good and its not even some stupid hybrid or CVT transmission and that is probably reason why its relative good in consumption even at high speeds
@@MagnusVenter369 A gear is short, wenn the rpm of the engine at topspeed is higher than the rpm with the max. output. So it is long, not short. Do not forget: This is a naturally aspirated engine in a not very lightweight car.
Їздив 7 років на Toyota Corolla 2012 року, проїхав 180 000 км, в цьому авто нічого за 10 років не змінилося 😂. Двигун був 1.6 а став 1.5, потужність не змінилася, авто для міста хороше, класна підвіска, але слабий двигун, відсутня шумоізоляція, на трасі після 120 км/год дуже гучно, потужності не вистачає
It does not make much sense to measure performance on a family sedan. It's like timing your grandparents to see who runs faster. 😂 Running fast is not what makes grannies and popsies good.
Pretty good performance for a small engine in a not so small car. Also, it's interesting that the consumption increases linear to the speed of the engine (and the car), while small turbo engines are exceptionally economical at lower speeds, but then dramatically increase as you go past 130 km/h
60-100 in 5 seconds flat is actually very respectable for the engine/car weight ratio. 0-150kph in 20 seconds as well. f.e. those figures are very comparable to a ~150kg lighter fiesta 1.0 125hp. the gearbox ratios fit nicely to the engine, its rare to see this nowadays. still the consumption is very good too. i like it. its no performance car but seems to be a very usable power delivery for everyday driving.
Had this car as a renter for 3 days. My first modern day car that I drove for almost 1000 kilometres. Tragic. You need to floor it to get it moving. Sound insulation absolutely terrible, very noisy inside. Good thing was the fuel economy in motorway, but my 20 year old diesel Volvo estate has the same fuel economy, almost twice the power and is way quieter in the cabin. Guess I'll need to maintain it for as long as possible
I had this car for 11 months and sold it. I don't know why I bought it in the first place. It was such a bad idea. This car is an absolute piece of s**t. Will never again buy a tOYOTA.
@@lordwiadro83I think you lie.
This car with this engine is the best investment in this turbo age. It will last a long time, if maintained properly, and the fuel consumption is stellar. It's better that my 1.6 NA Yamaha designed MK3 Focus which has 274 K km. The hybrids are good also, but disposable after 10 years when battery warranty expires.
Ese motor es el mismo que usa el yaris, en españa el corolla solo se vende motor 1.8 híbrido para la version 4 puertas, para el corolla sw, 2.0 hibrido.
Exacto, en España se puede adquirir el yaris con este motor
Va bien, buenas prestaciones y buen consumo
In the UK same, but you can only get 1.5 hybrid in yaris
I have never seen/knew a corolla with the 1.5 from the Yaris. That’s kinda interesting, I wish that Toyota could sell some only petrol variants of their cars.
Дякую за огляд.Є варіанти цієї машини з автоматом чи роботом??
i bleieve automatic
Тільки варіатор
I very much liked this 1.5 engine in Yaris. Sounds good and revs great.
It might be a bit too small for Corolla in my opinion.
thanks good job
amazing review
Is this VVT or Valvematic
1.4 diesel used officially in this car ?
nope, its a shame they stopped making them since 2017
Hello! Is this the 2023 facelifted model?
Doesn't seem like it, if I google facelift Corolla 2023 it's got a different nose.
@@declde Yes, it seems to be the first edition, before the facelift.
yes pre facelift
was it downhill on the 0 to 100 run
No it was flat road
first Toyota which consume relative normal-good and its not even some stupid hybrid or CVT transmission and that is probably reason why its relative good in consumption even at high speeds
Mi corolla hibrido corre mucho mas y consume menos
no it doesnt!! your corolla hybrid eats more fuel especially at higher speeds@@gvs9015
100km/h - 2600RPM 😮
What you are trying to say?
very short gear :( not good for highway, but perfect for city ride.
@@MagnusVenter369 A gear is short, wenn the rpm of the engine at topspeed is higher than the rpm with the max. output. So it is long, not short. Do not forget: This is a naturally aspirated engine in a not very lightweight car.
@@TheCrankshaftRotator I think it's optimal for the city and the surrounding area, but it will be noisy on the highway.
Most Toyota are noisy on highways@@MagnusVenter369
I didn't expect acceleration under 10 seconds
Їздив 7 років на Toyota Corolla 2012 року, проїхав 180 000 км, в цьому авто нічого за 10 років не змінилося 😂. Двигун був 1.6 а став 1.5, потужність не змінилася, авто для міста хороше, класна підвіска, але слабий двигун, відсутня шумоізоляція, на трасі після 120 км/год дуже гучно, потужності не вистачає
👏😍
If 2.0 with 4 cylinder, yes. This? Not a chance, this is an engine for small corolla or yaris and it will go bad very fast with this chassis.
Needs more torque, thats the main problem with small petrol engines
1 am
where are you located? 😂
It does not make much sense to measure performance on a family sedan. It's like timing your grandparents to see who runs faster. 😂 Running fast is not what makes grannies and popsies good.
Its the worst car i drove the last years.Go far away from this. Without insulation, very slow. You drive with 100 km/h and think you go with 200 km/h.