@@qetoun He is worse than Ron Swanson. Ron Swanson: "My Idea of the perfect government is one guy who sits in a small room at a desk, and the only thing he is allowed to decide - is who to nuke".
That’s the problem. Hypothetically almost all of these departments are important, but in reality they’re just bureaucrats. How many bridges does the Minister of Public Works fix? Zero. How many children does the Minister of Education teach? Zero. Etc. But they all take taxpayer money and have big benefits.
Money sinks. By removing all that useless fat the remaining ministries will need to actually work and they will be much more easily kept in line since less ministries means less reports, meaning there will be less paperwork to obfuscate the corruption (which thrives on an inflated bureaucracy - it was literally the first freaking thing the communists set up in Soviet Russia).
@@RichardKaye-e6tInternal Revenue Service, in charge of collecting taxes for the USA’s federal government. All governments need to collect taxes, but the IRS is a bloated, corrupt organization that has been weaponized both figuratively (like when Obama used it to go after his political opponents) and literally (Biden gave them guns).
Leslie Knope is Myriam Bregman in Argentina. Ron Swanson is Javier Milei in Argentina. Javier Milei and Myriam Bregman are extreme rivals. Both love and hate. And in addition to them there are other characters that sweeten or sour this soap opera called Argentina, such as Pato Bullrich, Macri, Cristina Kirchner, Massa. It is clear that not everything is Maradona, tango and Messi in Argentina
I worked in the government financed research sector in Germany. People were just wasting millions of euros each project and nothing came out of them ever.
Sounds like a skill issue from your part. Pretty much every innovative technology that is on the market right now (electronics, energy, medication, etc) was initially developed by the government (Grundlagenforschung) because it’s too risky for shareholders to invest in it in the beginning. Start defunding all of that stuff and maybe you get a 200% inflation like in Argentina
@@DaviidReiisBut fundamental research (Grundlagenforschung) has no value for the economy because anyone can make use of it. Germany has made immense progress with Grundlagenforschung but others are making money out of it.
Milei: *grabs Ministry of Education* Me: Uh, are you sure you should rip this one out? Milei: *pauses* ... Indoctrination... AFUERA! *Bring_me_to_the_horizon.mp3 starts playing *
Fun fact : China used to have 100 ministries before the market reforms, for light industries alone there were about a dozen different ministries, all of them were very busy. Guess what, they abolished more than half of them and every industry who got fewer ministries boomed!
You were trying to say this? In the international public reform literature, the basis for analysis has been the traditional Weberian Old Public Administration, which was influenced and changed from the 1980s, starting in Australia and New Zealand, by the New Public Management (NPM) reform wave. This wave was further modified by post-NPM from the late 1990s, which instead of using devolution and market principles, focused on increased coordination and the strengthening of the center. China has had these repeated rounds of government reforms and we ask what is characterizing them and whether they represent a clear shift from NPM to post-NPM, or are more layered and hybrid in a complex combination of the two reform waves. Chinese government reforms can be divided into three periods: the reforms of the 1980s, reforms in the 1990s and reforms in the new millennium. This encompassed eight rounds of reforms and we analyze the first seven, since the last reform round of 2018 is rather too fresh to analyze. *The different rounds of reforms* The reforms in the 1980s started with the 1982 reforms. The background was the launching of the Reform and Opening Up campaign in 1978 and Deng Xiaoping regaining supreme political power, resulting in an increased focus on economic growth. There was a need for a strong central state and administrative bodies that could regulate the growth processes, which made the central apparatus swell considerably. In reaction to this, the leadership tried to restructure the over-staffed and overlapping Party-state organizations. The 1982 reform was intended to reduce the total number of agencies in the State Council from 100 in 1981 to 61 in 1982, with a 40 percent reduction in staff from 51000 to 30000, without changing the basic government structure. In addition to this, a retirement system was established and lifelong tenure for some groups was abolished. The 1982 reform was rather superficial and the central apparatus quickly expanded again. The main objective of the 1988 reform was to adapt government structures better to the economic and political reforms, again aiming at downsizing. Also of importance was an attempt to make a clearer separation of government organizations from both the Party apparatus and the state-owned enterprises (SOEs), reflecting an aim to strengthen the regulatory function of the central apparatus. The reforms in the 1990s started with the 1993 reform, focusing on functional transformation. Against a background of the establishment of a so-called ‘socialist market economy system’ and aimed at satisfying the requirements of market-oriented economic reform, this reform proposed the concept of ‘administrative system reform’ (xingzheng guanli tizhi gaige) instead of the previous more limited concept of ‘institutional reform’ (jigou gaige). The idea was to underscore the broader transformational scope of this reform, but the actual reform elements were rather focused on downsizing, which again was difficult to sustain. The 1998 reform continued the 1993 reform along the lines of separating governmental functions from economic functions. There was more focus on macro-regulation, rather than micro-management, through downgrading, corporatization and mergers. Most of the specialized economic management departments were turned into State Bureaus under the leadership of the State Economic and Trade Commission (SETC), while their commercial functions were transferred to the respective economic enterprises. The reform decreased the number of central departments from 40 to 29 and the number of employees was cut from 33000 to 16000. The several rounds of reforms in the new millennium started with the 2003 reform. China’s entry into the World Trade Organization (WTO) exposed it to stronger international pressure and debureaucratization measures like simplifying approval systems became important. Internal market-oriented economic reforms and the external impact of globalization led to reform of the system for managing state-owned assets, to improve the macro-regulation system, to strengthen the financial regulatory system, to push forward the national trading system reform, and to establish a system regulating food and production safety. All these reorganizations were expected to strengthen the government’s role in coordinating the various departments more efficiently. A new phase began, which focused more on strengthening social management and public service functions than on economic management. The 2003 reform was more politically motivated than only focusing on administrative design, insofar as preparatory work for the 2008 super-ministries and service-oriented government (SOG) was started and followed up in the coming years. The main feature of the 2008 reform was the introduction of the super-ministry model. Five new super-ministries were established by merging existing departments, setting up new agencies and abolishing many old agencies, and other measures to strengthen central coordination were adopted. Aimed at building up a relatively stable ‘socialist administrative system’ with Chinese characteristics by 2020, the 2008 reform could be seen as a step in an ongoing reform process: “the priority now was to fine tune the policy making and supervisory roles of the national government through functional rationalization of the remaining agencies”. Once the super-ministry model had been established there was clear continuity between the 2013 and the 2008 reform. Under this reform, several sectors were reorganized to deal with related coordination matters and to provide better services, and a cross-ministerial Coordinating Group for the Functional Transformation of the State Council was established. Building a service-oriented government (SOG) was a main objective of the reform, implying more debureaucratization measures. The new reforms were launched after President Xi came to power, and his main priority was political stability. Therefore, it was soon decided to set up a Central Leading Group for Comprehensively Deepening Reform, providing a political and organizational guarantee for building a ‘law-based and service-oriented government’ on a broad basis. *Explaining the reform development in China - structural and cultural drivers* Governmental reforms in China since the 1980s have been driven by the political leadership and have encompassed diverse structural measures, i.e. they have had the characteristics of political-administrative design. They have also to a certain extent been influenced by different governance models and their combination. Many of the reform measures in China in the 1980s were mainly influenced by Weberian bureaucracy and the Old Public Administration (OPA) model, while downsizing and separating government from SOEs were inspired by NPM. The regulatory reforms of the 1990s were inspired by both NPM and post-NPM. The 2003 reforms, heavily influenced by the entry into the WTO, had a typical NPM flavor, but could also be seen as the start of the 2008 and 2013 reforms, which were very typical post-NPM reforms focusing on a super-ministry model, a typical structural merger strategy, and the service-oriented government reform. The reforms are also connected to changing cultural norms and values. The excessive pursuit of economic values in China from the 1990s onwards potentially threatened and undermined other values, like ethical, social, egalitarian and environmental values. In contrast, the post-NPM reforms have tried to counteract these tendencies, particularly in the new millennium through cultural integration, ethical norms, improving health and social insurance measures and later environmental regulation. More focus on social management and post-NPM measures in the new millennium added to the economically motivated administrative and regulatory measures of the 1980s and 1990s, making the system more complex, layered and hybrid. Summing up, even though China has imitated many governmental reforms in the West, the seven reforms analyzed do not fit easily into any single Western pattern. Rather, under the Party’s substantial control, China’s reform story can be seen as a layering process combining some major elements of NPM and post-NPM with its own traditional administrative system, resulting in more hybrid and complex organizational forms and value orientations in which governance elements pointing in somewhat different directions coexist. Particularly, post-NPM reforms have an increasing focus on horizontal coordination and value-based governance, which is crucial in such a complex and heterogeneous system as China’s. A common feature of China’s government reforms is that the Party-state leadership in the State Council takes the reform initiative, and thus these seven rounds of government reforms are directly influenced by its political cycle. The question is whether post-NPM reform efforts are just a reflection of the natural tendency of a one-party state wanting to increase social stability or whether they will continue to be a strong reform movement. To judge from the 2018 reform just launched, post-NPM-oriented reforms will be around for some time.
@@allanlomas5133 Considering that I live in Poland it's... quite unlikely. Also, I was one of those who were laughing their asses off while watching leftist meltdown after 2016 elections. The problem with Trump is that his only good quality is just pissing off leftists. He doesn't have anything else to offer.
@@ivoturi I heard somewhere where he said that it will take 18 to 24 months to tame the inflation and another thing where he said it would take up to 35 years to completely fix Argentina.
Leslie Knope is Myriam Bregman in Argentina. Ron Swanson is Javier Milei in Argentina. Javier Milei and Myriam Bregman are extreme rivals. Both love and hate. And in addition to them there are other characters that sweeten or sour this soap opera called Argentina, such as Pato Bullrich, Cristina Kirchner, Sergio Massa, Macri the Cat. It is clear that not everything is Maradona, tango and Messi in Argentina. ⭐🌟⭐🇦🇷🧉
non. Y'a certainement beaucoup de travail à faire, je veux pas remplacer les gauchistes par des droitardés, très peu pour moi. C'est tomber de Charybde en Scylla. J'ai pas envie qu'on privatise les rails (pour nous faire payer plus cher) ni qu'on abolisse nos normes environnementales (pour remplacer notre gastronomie par de la malebouffe). Et la fameuse "liberté" de Milei, dans la bouche de ces types, c'est uniquement la liberté pour ceux qui ont les moyens. Donc, non merci.
A military is always necessary. One of the few things the government should actually be doing is defending the nation and its borders. All thr other shit is just nonsense.
He is a practical minarchist, and Argentina has plenty of valuable natural resources that will be coveted in the future in the event of a global collapse of society. Not having a Ministry of Defense would be crazy, especially for a country so large or one that intends to return to the big leagues.
@@BozgorSlayer It was also influenced by various Germanic languages. Reason why if you look at German and English today, they have much more similar sentence structure than the romance languages. Only major difference at a glance is using different words.
Los entire, no siguen de cerca la política Argentina, Milei tiene un gran desafío, pero es una persona muy sincera, esta muy preparado en economía, sabe muy claro si rumbo. Wue no es nada nuevo , hacer lo que hacen los paises desarrollados
@@Ren524YT Para poder darle más gobernabilidad. Ya Milei la tiene re contra difícil para lograr lo que propone y salvarnos de la crisis. Sólo era casi imposible. Los de JxC dijeron que lo iban a apoyar con casi todo, menos con 2 cosas, que son la dolarización y el cierre del banco central.
President: Javier Milei Vicepresident: Victoria Villaruel First Lady: Fátima Flórez Head of the Cabinet of Ministers: Nicolás Posse Ministry of Human Capital: Sandra Pettovello - Secretary of Children and Family: Pablo de la Torre - Secretary of Health: Eduardo Filgueira Lima - Secretary of Education: Martín Krause - Secretary of Labor: Omar Yasín Ministry of Defence: Not defined Ministry of Economy: Not defined (probably Luis Caputo) - Secretary of Energy: Eduardo Rodríguez Chirillo - Mining Secretariat: Not defined Ministry of Infrastructure: Guillermo Ferraro - Secretary of Transportation: Not defined Ministry of Interior: Guillermo Francos Ministry of Justice: Mariano Cúneo Libarona Ministry of Foreign Affairs or Chancellor: Diana Mondino Ministery of Security: Patricia Bullrich
Less govt interventions & let the market play it out, supply & demand.... More politicians should adopt such policies. The majority of global pollies are useless
@@nicolaslabra2225that’s like calling a nationalist unhinged because he wants strong borders. A libertarian not wanting a government to do what the market can deliver is pretty standard.
He's visiting next week to meet with Trump & Elon Also get rid of NASA and have Space X as the Primary Space Administration for the United States of America
I live in argentina and the only thing the ministry of women and gender diversity did was PLACING RED CHAIRS IN PARKS. They also spent a bunch of money on lunches and even ignored a femicide because it was a holiday...
I don't like Milei but the fact that there's a ministry specifically for women and not for men is a fucking joke. Not even bias, just stupidness and shortsightedness.
@@macaco5861 Y no olvides el asesinato del caso Cecilia, que como la mataron los kirchneristas en los medios y las feministas no dijeron nada, al igual que Nisman.
In 2024, Massa printed 5 monetary bases trying to win the elections. If that were not enough the position of the Leliqs, which could be 30, 60, 90, 120, 150 and 180 days had all been converted to one-day passes. This means that at the time Milei assumed the monetary base could have quadrupled in one day. At the same time, in terms of price dynamics, since there is a controlled exchange rate with such a large gap, the flip side is that there is what is technically called money overhang. The magnitude of the monetary surplus at that time was basically similar to what we had before the rodrigazo of 1975, which implied at that time when the country ran out of reserves and had to forcefully devalue, sixfold the inflation rate, In fact, it went from 30 to 180 percent. We had had a similar experience in 1959, also of similar magnitude and it had also involved a six-fold increase in the inflation rate: at that time it went from 20 to 120. Therefore, if we had inflation that was basically traveling at 200% , that implied that the inflation rate would reach levels of 1200%; Furthermore, if we consider that we could be tripling the base, let's say increasing the base three times, that would imply taking inflation to 3,600 percent annually. And if, on the other hand, we consider that the previous government issued 13 points of GDP directly and indirectly with a base that today is 2.6, it meant multiplying by 5. That is, we put in four times four times more monetary base; That is, we would be talking about an inflation rate in the order of 15,000 percent. This seems exaggerated, doing the math from the monetary side, the reality is that during the first week of December prices were already traveling at 1% daily; That's annualized 3,700 percent annually. When you consider how it happened in the first two weeks of December, the acceleration was so great that prices were already traveling at 7,500 percent annually. And this seems like an exaggeration and in fact many accuse us of having been exaggerated, when you take the case of wholesale inflation in the month of December it was 54%. That in annualized terms gives 17,000. That is to say, we were effectively walking the path to hyperinflation; In other words, the only thing that hyperinflation required to materialize was monetary validation. Now inflation is traveling at ~10% monthly and lowering every month for more details look up the llao llao foro speech.
I am not sure about every of his choices, but cancelling BS jobs would be good EVERYWHERE. This includes a lot of capitalist and libertarian people too, since economy is very good at creating these jobs as well.
For those who dont understand: Milei is a libertarian who wants less government intervention so hes getting rid of the government sectors he deems unessential
@@hannaheye mejorando de a poco. La inflación comenzó a bajar, saldrá en breve una ley con muchas mejoras para pequeñas y medianas empresas. Todos los días se destapan cosas que pasaban turbias y quienes tenían el poder cada vez son menos escuchados.
Brings me comfort to know there's at least ONE place left on the planet where the bottom 1% aren't being handed everything they ask for, in exchange for the bottom 90%'s personal autonomy.
@@murray9807His salary and the poverty rate... up! Poverty rate has increased by 13% from 44% to 57% in his presidency - which is probably a record for the fastest ever...
People comparing Milei to Trump don't seem to understand anything. Trump is a life long democrat, he loves big government. Milei is an ancap, if he could he would privatize the government.
As an American conservative, I love Milei, although I also respect your President. He runs a tight ship and hasn't backed down from NATO's interference and bullying, or from dissenting against the WEF. As an outsider, I think that's worth tolerating some crony politics for. You have a patriot running your country. We need one running ours again.
Ron Swanson would be proud.
He IS Ron Swanson!
@@qetoun He is worse than Ron Swanson.
Ron Swanson: "My Idea of the perfect government is one guy who sits in a small room at a desk, and the only thing he is allowed to decide - is who to nuke".
@@qetounI can’t wait for the mashup videos.
"Afuera" should be put on the Swanson Pyramid of Greatness.
@@joshuagoldstein8116 God's way of determining who is smart and who is poor is totally Milei
Elon Musk as head of the Department of Government Efficiency:
Age too well
Shit just got real
Did you just predict the future?
AFUERA!
Well i’ll be damned! Get Em Vivek and Elon. AFUERA!
That public works one was personal 😂😂
Because it resisted
You really think Argentina will survive without the ministry of gender and diversity?
@@levismith7444 Oh God, YES IT WILL. Anything survives without globalist grifters and corrupt surplus minions.
@@levismith7444yes we do
@@levismith7444 Lol yes we do
Vivek and Elon to head the equivalent initiative in the USA. AFUERA!
AFUERA!
AFUERA
Yes! 💯
AFUERA!
More freedom to the people!!!!
For a country barely dragging itself along, they sure had a lot of ministers.
That’s the problem. Hypothetically almost all of these departments are important, but in reality they’re just bureaucrats. How many bridges does the Minister of Public Works fix? Zero. How many children does the Minister of Education teach? Zero. Etc. But they all take taxpayer money and have big benefits.
"I think so I exist."
"The more I think the less I exist."
I guess the same applies to the countries. Too much gouvernment eventually leads to a mess.
Money sinks. By removing all that useless fat the remaining ministries will need to actually work and they will be much more easily kept in line since less ministries means less reports, meaning there will be less paperwork to obfuscate the corruption (which thrives on an inflated bureaucracy - it was literally the first freaking thing the communists set up in Soviet Russia).
Both of you have GOT to be retarded@@hydra7427
First time reading about Peronist economics?
Ministry of haircut, AFUERA!
But senor, how about the first lady hairdo?
HAHAHAHA
Jajajajjajaja excelente …
Miserável!! É um gênio!!
😂
AFUERA! Is my new favorite Spanish word
😊
Good one like cerveza 🍺
Mine is "CARAJO" is way better than "Damn it"
@@Geokat_mapping 16 años de socialismo=hambre
Doggy afuera!😂
FBI, ATF, IRS, AFUERA!
Afuera to the bottom pits of hell.
DEA. Afuera!
wtf is this “irs” you speak of?
@@RichardKaye-e6tInternal Revenue Service, in charge of collecting taxes for the USA’s federal government. All governments need to collect taxes, but the IRS is a bloated, corrupt organization that has been weaponized both figuratively (like when Obama used it to go after his political opponents) and literally (Biden gave them guns).
@@RichardKaye-e6t Internal Revenue Service. Perhaps the most hated Federal agency in America.
This guy has got me saying afuera to everything for the bin.
Same. I've been addicted to afuera for months now.
💕😆
😂😂😂
This guy is Argentina’s Ron Swanson 😂
Ron es una copia de milei
Leslie Knope is Myriam Bregman in Argentina. Ron Swanson is Javier Milei in Argentina.
Javier Milei and Myriam Bregman are extreme rivals. Both love and hate. And in addition to them there are other characters that sweeten or sour this soap opera called Argentina, such as Pato Bullrich, Macri, Cristina Kirchner, Massa. It is clear that not everything is Maradona, tango and Messi in Argentina
Rob Schneider
@@matymcflaitoo many names. Messi for President
Javier Milei Chainsaw Man
ruclips.net/video/SdHgaVZRA7U/видео.html
You are a hero, sir.
I worked in the government financed research sector in Germany. People were just wasting millions of euros each project and nothing came out of them ever.
AFUERA!!
Sounds like a skill issue from your part. Pretty much every innovative technology that is on the market right now (electronics, energy, medication, etc) was initially developed by the government (Grundlagenforschung) because it’s too risky for shareholders to invest in it in the beginning. Start defunding all of that stuff and maybe you get a 200% inflation like in Argentina
Some but not most.
to be fair, this looks like research in general
even in private sector (pharmaceutical) you spend 10 years on a drug for it not working
@@DaviidReiisBut fundamental research (Grundlagenforschung) has no value for the economy because anyone can make use of it. Germany has made immense progress with Grundlagenforschung but others are making money out of it.
Milei: *grabs Ministry of Education*
Me: Uh, are you sure you should rip this one out?
Milei: *pauses* ... Indoctrination... AFUERA!
*Bring_me_to_the_horizon.mp3 starts playing *
Education was send to human capital
@@RalveXly But it will surely be different
Edit: and that would be much better
@@Max_Power_As an Argentine student I hope it is.
@@Max_Power_ and it better is lol
@@mr.pokemont7936 Yeah, I'm Argentinian too and I hope the same.
Yesss!! "Presidente Afuera" is my nickname for him after this fabulous moment!!!
Fun fact : China used to have 100 ministries before the market reforms, for light industries alone there were about a dozen different ministries, all of them were very busy.
Guess what, they abolished more than half of them and every industry who got fewer ministries boomed!
You were trying to say this?
In the international public reform literature, the basis for analysis has been the traditional Weberian Old Public Administration, which was influenced and changed from the 1980s, starting in Australia and New Zealand, by the New Public Management (NPM) reform wave. This wave was further modified by post-NPM from the late 1990s, which instead of using devolution and market principles, focused on increased coordination and the strengthening of the center.
China has had these repeated rounds of government reforms and we ask what is characterizing them and whether they represent a clear shift from NPM to post-NPM, or are more layered and hybrid in a complex combination of the two reform waves. Chinese government reforms can be divided into three periods: the reforms of the 1980s, reforms in the 1990s and reforms in the new millennium. This encompassed eight rounds of reforms and we analyze the first seven, since the last reform round of 2018 is rather too fresh to analyze.
*The different rounds of reforms*
The reforms in the 1980s started with the 1982 reforms. The background was the launching of the Reform and Opening Up campaign in 1978 and Deng Xiaoping regaining supreme political power, resulting in an increased focus on economic growth. There was a need for a strong central state and administrative bodies that could regulate the growth processes, which made the central apparatus swell considerably. In reaction to this, the leadership tried to restructure the over-staffed and overlapping Party-state organizations. The 1982 reform was intended to reduce the total number of agencies in the State Council from 100 in 1981 to 61 in 1982, with a 40 percent reduction in staff from 51000 to 30000, without changing the basic government structure. In addition to this, a retirement system was established and lifelong tenure for some groups was abolished.
The 1982 reform was rather superficial and the central apparatus quickly expanded again. The main objective of the 1988 reform was to adapt government structures better to the economic and political reforms, again aiming at downsizing. Also of importance was an attempt to make a clearer separation of government organizations from both the Party apparatus and the state-owned enterprises (SOEs), reflecting an aim to strengthen the regulatory function of the central apparatus.
The reforms in the 1990s started with the 1993 reform, focusing on functional transformation. Against a background of the establishment of a so-called ‘socialist market economy system’ and aimed at satisfying the requirements of market-oriented economic reform, this reform proposed the concept of ‘administrative system reform’ (xingzheng guanli tizhi gaige) instead of the previous more limited concept of ‘institutional reform’ (jigou gaige). The idea was to underscore the broader transformational scope of this reform, but the actual reform elements were rather focused on downsizing, which again was difficult to sustain.
The 1998 reform continued the 1993 reform along the lines of separating governmental functions from economic functions. There was more focus on macro-regulation, rather than micro-management, through downgrading, corporatization and mergers. Most of the specialized economic management departments were turned into State Bureaus under the leadership of the State Economic and Trade Commission (SETC), while their commercial functions were transferred to the respective economic enterprises. The reform decreased the number of central departments from 40 to 29 and the number of employees was cut from 33000 to 16000.
The several rounds of reforms in the new millennium started with the 2003 reform. China’s entry into the World Trade Organization (WTO) exposed it to stronger international pressure and debureaucratization measures like simplifying approval systems became important. Internal market-oriented economic reforms and the external impact of globalization led to reform of the system for managing state-owned assets, to improve the macro-regulation system, to strengthen the financial regulatory system, to push forward the national trading system reform, and to establish a system regulating food and production safety. All these reorganizations were expected to strengthen the government’s role in coordinating the various departments more efficiently.
A new phase began, which focused more on strengthening social management and public service functions than on economic management. The 2003 reform was more politically motivated than only focusing on administrative design, insofar as preparatory work for the 2008 super-ministries and service-oriented government (SOG) was started and followed up in the coming years.
The main feature of the 2008 reform was the introduction of the super-ministry model. Five new super-ministries were established by merging existing departments, setting up new agencies and abolishing many old agencies, and other measures to strengthen central coordination were adopted. Aimed at building up a relatively stable ‘socialist administrative system’ with Chinese characteristics by 2020, the 2008 reform could be seen as a step in an ongoing reform process: “the priority now was to fine tune the policy making and supervisory roles of the national government through functional rationalization of the remaining agencies”.
Once the super-ministry model had been established there was clear continuity between the 2013 and the 2008 reform. Under this reform, several sectors were reorganized to deal with related coordination matters and to provide better services, and a cross-ministerial Coordinating Group for the Functional Transformation of the State Council was established. Building a service-oriented government (SOG) was a main objective of the reform, implying more debureaucratization measures. The new reforms were launched after President Xi came to power, and his main priority was political stability. Therefore, it was soon decided to set up a Central Leading Group for Comprehensively Deepening Reform, providing a political and organizational guarantee for building a ‘law-based and service-oriented government’ on a broad basis.
*Explaining the reform development in China - structural and cultural drivers*
Governmental reforms in China since the 1980s have been driven by the political leadership and have encompassed diverse structural measures, i.e. they have had the characteristics of political-administrative design. They have also to a certain extent been influenced by different governance models and their combination. Many of the reform measures in China in the 1980s were mainly influenced by Weberian bureaucracy and the Old Public Administration (OPA) model, while downsizing and separating government from SOEs were inspired by NPM. The regulatory reforms of the 1990s were inspired by both NPM and post-NPM. The 2003 reforms, heavily influenced by the entry into the WTO, had a typical NPM flavor, but could also be seen as the start of the 2008 and 2013 reforms, which were very typical post-NPM reforms focusing on a super-ministry model, a typical structural merger strategy, and the service-oriented government reform.
The reforms are also connected to changing cultural norms and values. The excessive pursuit of economic values in China from the 1990s onwards potentially threatened and undermined other values, like ethical, social, egalitarian and environmental values. In contrast, the post-NPM reforms have tried to counteract these tendencies, particularly in the new millennium through cultural integration, ethical norms, improving health and social insurance measures and later environmental regulation. More focus on social management and post-NPM measures in the new millennium added to the economically motivated administrative and regulatory measures of the 1980s and 1990s, making the system more complex, layered and hybrid.
Summing up, even though China has imitated many governmental reforms in the West, the seven reforms analyzed do not fit easily into any single Western pattern. Rather, under the Party’s substantial control, China’s reform story can be seen as a layering process combining some major elements of NPM and post-NPM with its own traditional administrative system, resulting in more hybrid and complex organizational forms and value orientations in which governance elements pointing in somewhat different directions coexist. Particularly, post-NPM reforms have an increasing focus on horizontal coordination and value-based governance, which is crucial in such a complex and heterogeneous system as China’s.
A common feature of China’s government reforms is that the Party-state leadership in the State Council takes the reform initiative, and thus these seven rounds of government reforms are directly influenced by its political cycle. The question is whether post-NPM reform efforts are just a reflection of the natural tendency of a one-party state wanting to increase social stability or whether they will continue to be a strong reform movement. To judge from the 2018 reform just launched, post-NPM-oriented reforms will be around for some time.
"Aunque te resistas!"
XDDDDD me encanta como Milei habla.
This will always cheer me up when I'm feeling down. Lots of AFUERAS.
I started learning Spanish because of this video.
Hows it coming along?
I hope you haven't procrastinated.
Donde esta la biblioteca ?
Me too🤣
Viva la libertad, carajo!
💕
Trump's slogan for 2024 should be 'Afuera !' 😂
I wanna hear Trump say "Viva la libertad, carajo!" like this guy.
Trump is not a libertarian, he's a clown
@@MrHejkeand he's going to be your president. again. haha.
@@zalabit927 Did this in my mind with typical Trump voice. Funniest shit for awhile.
@@allanlomas5133 Considering that I live in Poland it's... quite unlikely.
Also, I was one of those who were laughing their asses off while watching leftist meltdown after 2016 elections. The problem with Trump is that his only good quality is just pissing off leftists. He doesn't have anything else to offer.
The whole world has learnt the word "AFUERA "
Harris: I was born in a middle class family…
Trump: AFUERA!
this guy making me want to move to argentina...
maybe in a few decades lol. we are drowning in shit, if Milei isn't a fraud, it'll still take years
@@ivoturi I heard somewhere where he said that it will take 18 to 24 months to tame the inflation and another thing where he said it would take up to 35 years to completely fix Argentina.
Parks and recreation department - AFUERA
Donald Trump want this out
"Although you resist" lol k funny
I love this guy. Canada needs this guy. AFUERA Trudeau AFUERA.
You afoera
@@subhankarpaul8719Like that commie cuck huh?
@@subhankarpaul8719 - what are you some kind of Trudeau lover?
@@subhankarpaul8719 keep crying liberal
Jajajaja
Love this guy! Afuera!!!! 😂
"Long Live Freedom, D*mn it!"
He took office with 21% monthly inflation in december, agust inflation was 4% and going down today is 1/9/2024
2.7% today is 24/11/2024
When my mum cleans my room
Miserável!!!
¡Viva la libertad carajo!
Leslie Knope is Myriam Bregman in Argentina. Ron Swanson is Javier Milei in Argentina.
Javier Milei and Myriam Bregman are extreme rivals. Both love and hate. And in addition to them there are other characters that sweeten or sour this soap opera called Argentina, such as Pato Bullrich, Cristina Kirchner, Sergio Massa, Macri the Cat. It is clear that not everything is Maradona, tango and Messi in Argentina. ⭐🌟⭐🇦🇷🧉
Finally I can say.. All the effort of learning Spanish was worth it and finally I understand politics! 🎉
Bring this giga chad to France, there's work to be done ! AFUERA !!!
non. Y'a certainement beaucoup de travail à faire, je veux pas remplacer les gauchistes par des droitardés, très peu pour moi. C'est tomber de Charybde en Scylla. J'ai pas envie qu'on privatise les rails (pour nous faire payer plus cher) ni qu'on abolisse nos normes environnementales (pour remplacer notre gastronomie par de la malebouffe). Et la fameuse "liberté" de Milei, dans la bouche de ces types, c'est uniquement la liberté pour ceux qui ont les moyens. Donc, non merci.
Always trust the guy who's doing a Saul Goodman impression at the end of his little speech
HAHAHAHA
Guess what, stats are out he reduced monthly inflation from 25.2 percent last December to 8.8 april
'We're in the most debt we've been in ever'
'Alright, call in the Ministry of Women and Gender and Diversity!'
I love how he keeps the ministry of defense 😂 I guess different anarchists have different priorities depending on where they are on the spectrum
Most minarchists and libertarians agree that the military is one of the core duties of the state.
Did you really expect an *anarcho-capitalist* to have a consistent ideology?
A military is always necessary. One of the few things the government should actually be doing is defending the nation and its borders. All thr other shit is just nonsense.
He is a practical minarchist, and Argentina has plenty of valuable natural resources that will be coveted in the future in the event of a global collapse of society. Not having a Ministry of Defense would be crazy, especially for a country so large or one that intends to return to the big leagues.
Vamos Milei! Viva la libertad carajo!
😁😁😁
He has such Saul Goodman vibes
Ron Swanson became the president.
AFUERA!!!
Trump, Elon, RFK and Ron Paul day 1 be like;
What a champ is Milei and he is doing it!!!
the best video in the internet history
short and sweet 🤣
Giga chad of politics
Crazy thing is I can understand his Spanish kinda OK! Funny how languages kinda stick, but bad accents throw me
Latin. English was influenced by Latin & French.
@@BozgorSlayer It was also influenced by various Germanic languages. Reason why if you look at German and English today, they have much more similar sentence structure than the romance languages. Only major difference at a glance is using different words.
I'm Portuguese so for obvious reasons I understood everything he said.
👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏viva la Argentina 🇦🇷
This man is great
Ron swanson: thats my guy
Los entire, no siguen de cerca la política Argentina, Milei tiene un gran desafío, pero es una persona muy sincera, esta muy preparado en economía, sabe muy claro si rumbo. Wue no es nada nuevo , hacer lo que hacen los paises desarrollados
Por eso está todo el gabinete de cambiemos no?
La gente que apoya a Milei o no es de acá, o empezo a seguir la política hace unos meses
@@Ren524YT Para poder darle más gobernabilidad. Ya Milei la tiene re contra difícil para lograr lo que propone y salvarnos de la crisis. Sólo era casi imposible. Los de JxC dijeron que lo iban a apoyar con casi todo, menos con 2 cosas, que son la dolarización y el cierre del banco central.
President: Javier Milei
Vicepresident: Victoria Villaruel
First Lady: Fátima Flórez
Head of the Cabinet of Ministers: Nicolás Posse
Ministry of Human Capital: Sandra Pettovello
- Secretary of Children and Family: Pablo de la Torre
- Secretary of Health: Eduardo Filgueira Lima
- Secretary of Education: Martín Krause
- Secretary of Labor: Omar Yasín
Ministry of Defence: Not defined
Ministry of Economy: Not defined (probably Luis Caputo)
- Secretary of Energy: Eduardo Rodríguez Chirillo
- Mining Secretariat: Not defined
Ministry of Infrastructure: Guillermo Ferraro
- Secretary of Transportation: Not defined
Ministry of Interior: Guillermo Francos
Ministry of Justice: Mariano Cúneo Libarona
Ministry of Foreign Affairs or Chancellor: Diana Mondino
Ministery of Security: Patricia Bullrich
Cómo me picha que sea Bullrich de vuelta
Espero que esta vez haga más que sacarse fotitos con la patrulla nomás
Lo de Bullrich no esta confirmado es un rumor
@@eze.king7 eso aparece en wikipedia
he's so based
Not enough. He is a liberal because he believes in dumbocracy.
mmm i love 13% poverty rate increase in just a couple months from 44% to 57%
@@socire72 Lol communists dont know shit.
@@socire72
Just as I love inflation decreasing.
@@juanlaise1059 "All the money i no longer have is worth more, yay!"
This is amazing!!😂😂❤❤❤❤
Ron Swanson's Dream
Leslie Knope's Nightmare
Let the dream become reality
@@RandomRothbardianhere here
Rob Swanson = Javier Milei.
Leslie Knope = Myriam Bregman.
Left love Rigth.
Rigth love Left.
Leslie Knope's dream was literally no one else's: Hillary Clinton.
Less govt interventions & let the market play it out, supply & demand.... More politicians should adopt such policies. The majority of global pollies are useless
True.
jeez the libertarians are more unhinged by the day
@@nicolaslabra2225 The lefties are the ones unhinged. And healthy peolpe had enough of that ussr state.
@@nicolaslabra2225 Stop projecting leftist.
@@nicolaslabra2225that’s like calling a nationalist unhinged because he wants strong borders.
A libertarian not wanting a government to do what the market can deliver is pretty standard.
That's Donald Trump right now too lol
Coming soon to a White House near you.
He's visiting next week to meet with Trump & Elon
Also get rid of NASA and have Space X as the Primary Space Administration for the United States of America
Afuera!!! I love it.
Can we get this guy to be president here
OG DOGE...... Javier is him...
Trump's New Vocabulary....AFUERA!!!!
Vivek Ramaswamy & Elon Musk: AFUERA 🔥
Keep in mind they have a smaller economy than many us states. Having all this government is insane
Olympics football:
AFUERA!!
Ministry of Women and Gender Diversity??
I live in argentina and the only thing the ministry of women and gender diversity did was PLACING RED CHAIRS IN PARKS. They also spent a bunch of money on lunches and even ignored a femicide because it was a holiday...
ELIMINADO
@@macaco5861💀💀💀💀💀
I don't like Milei but the fact that there's a ministry specifically for women and not for men is a fucking joke. Not even bias, just stupidness and shortsightedness.
@@macaco5861 Y no olvides el asesinato del caso Cecilia, que como la mataron los kirchneristas en los medios y las feministas no dijeron nada, al igual que Nisman.
In 2024, Massa printed 5 monetary bases trying to win the elections.
If that were not enough the position of the Leliqs, which could be 30, 60, 90, 120, 150 and 180 days had all been converted to one-day passes. This means that at the time Milei assumed the monetary base could have quadrupled in one day. At the same time, in terms of price dynamics, since there is a controlled exchange rate with such a large gap, the flip side is that there is what is technically called money overhang. The magnitude of the monetary surplus at that time was basically similar to what we had before the rodrigazo of 1975, which implied at that time when the country ran out of reserves and had to forcefully devalue, sixfold the inflation rate, In fact, it went from 30 to 180 percent. We had had a similar experience in 1959, also of similar magnitude and it had also involved a six-fold increase in the inflation rate: at that time it went from 20 to 120. Therefore, if we had inflation that was basically traveling at 200% , that implied that the inflation rate would reach levels of 1200%; Furthermore, if we consider that we could be tripling the base, let's say increasing the base three times, that would imply taking inflation to 3,600 percent annually. And if, on the other hand, we consider that the previous government issued 13 points of GDP directly and indirectly with a base that today is 2.6, it meant multiplying by 5. That is, we put in four times four times more monetary base; That is, we would be talking about an inflation rate in the order of 15,000 percent.
This seems exaggerated, doing the math from the monetary side, the reality is that during the first week of December prices were already traveling at 1% daily; That's annualized 3,700 percent annually. When you consider how it happened in the first two weeks of December, the acceleration was so great that prices were already traveling at 7,500 percent annually. And this seems like an exaggeration and in fact many accuse us of having been exaggerated, when you take the case of wholesale inflation in the month of December it was 54%. That in annualized terms gives 17,000. That is to say, we were effectively walking the path to hyperinflation; In other words, the only thing that hyperinflation required to materialize was monetary validation.
Now inflation is traveling at ~10% monthly and lowering every month
for more details look up the llao llao foro speech.
I am not sure about every of his choices, but cancelling BS jobs would be good EVERYWHERE. This includes a lot of capitalist and libertarian people too, since economy is very good at creating these jobs as well.
Espero que gobiernes bien Milei
An your username is dennis afuera also 😂😂😂
So he is constantly screaming your name 😅😂😆
Afuera...
I love it.
I get the feeling this man will be a treasure of memes. 😂
He's Visiting USA next week to Meet Trump & Elon i hope they do the same thing with all the USA Agencies we don't need 😂
a hero
For those who dont understand: Milei is a libertarian who wants less government intervention so hes getting rid of the government sectors he deems unessential
A F U E R A !
this guy is awesome...NOW lets see if their economy and public well being increases....if so people will still not believe it
It is slowly getting better. The first few months were awful though.
He's a genius. 😛
Orgulloso de vivir en este universo en el que Milei es presidente.
Vives en Argentina? Como esta ahora?
@@hannaheye mejorando de a poco. La inflación comenzó a bajar, saldrá en breve una ley con muchas mejoras para pequeñas y medianas empresas. Todos los días se destapan cosas que pasaban turbias y quienes tenían el poder cada vez son menos escuchados.
"although you resist" XD
BLM? AFUERA!!!
AOC? AFUERA!!
OPEN BORDER? AFUERA!!!
ALZHEIMERS JOE?? AFUERA!!!
KAMALA HARRIS? AFUERA!!!!
DEI? AFUERA!!!
😂😂😂
Like a boss! Respect, Milei!!!!! Thanks for paving the way to some here in the USA.
Please come to France.. We're dying here..
We too in Germany!
Long live freedom dammit!
Best quote ever.
About to migrant there from America...
Milei es el mejor político del mundo, por lejos!
Brings me comfort to know there's at least ONE place left on the planet where the bottom 1% aren't being handed everything they ask for, in exchange for the bottom 90%'s personal autonomy.
wait what happens to the other 9% :0
@@alanlado1602 Those are the top 10%, the uneffected rich. See, the bottom 1% is part of the bottom 90, so that leaves 10.
Where is that place you speak of?
@@matthiasklopke161 Argentina, of course! Though I'm not sure how long after this it will remain so.
This is the dumbest thing I have read this year. 😂
Hm, I wonder, if there's gonna be new Javiers Mileis in any other countries?
Bukele in the salvador
AFUERA!!
When the in laws come to the house unannounced… afuera!
Coming to american 2.0
Javier milei🇦🇷🤝netanyahu🇮🇱🤝zelensky🇺🇦
El mejor trio.
Zelenskyy is xxxxing crook ... Don't be fooled my friend.
He is like an anime character.
Here he was compared with the anime ChainsawMan, he also grabbed a Pochita between the multitude. There are lot of memes about it.
In fact, the future chancellor of his government promoted pochita as the official mascot for the campaign
@@fyreblaztershahahahaha
AFOUERA
Me agrada mucho la gente que cumple lo que promete🦁🦁🦁❤❤❤🇦🇷🇦🇷🇦🇷
I love this man 🤣
Indiana needs such a man!
Edit: looking back on this, Indiana does not need 250% inflation.
Did Uncle Klaus penetrate India too?
I would argue Illinois needs it more 😂
Indeed... they really need a real man!
That's accumulated inflation from the previous goverment, he's actually started to lower it
@@murray9807His salary and the poverty rate... up!
Poverty rate has increased by 13% from 44% to 57% in his presidency - which is probably a record for the fastest ever...
People comparing Milei to Trump don't seem to understand anything. Trump is a life long democrat, he loves big government. Milei is an ancap, if he could he would privatize the government.
How is trump a democrat?
trump is right conservative
The Saul Goodman of politicians. 😂
1:07
Русские либертарианцы по-доброму завидуют Аргентине. ¡viva el presidente Milei!
As an American conservative, I love Milei, although I also respect your President. He runs a tight ship and hasn't backed down from NATO's interference and bullying, or from dissenting against the WEF. As an outsider, I think that's worth tolerating some crony politics for. You have a patriot running your country. We need one running ours again.
Saludos desde argentina amigo ruso
Русские либертарианцы идиоты
Come to Argentina, it's easy
@@HuntingTarg You posted your bullshit under guy with 'No war' pfp
we need this in USA too.
Public works AFUERAAA