High Efficiency Gas Turbine Technology | Gas Power Generation | GE Power

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 15 окт 2024
  • H-class gas turbines from GE offer the most cost-effective conversion of natural gas to electricity in their class. GE’s HA plants are the most efficient in the world. The 9HA combined-cycle power plant at the EDF plant in France set a world record with 62.22 percent efficiency. Learn more: www.ge.com/gas...

Комментарии • 74

  • @hakbar8657
    @hakbar8657 2 года назад +1

    راستی که این توربین حجت را بر همه تمام کرد ،اون ملخهایه منضم وشکیل خودش بازگوی همه چیزه،،واقعا دست مهندسان طراحش جای بوسیدن داره سپاس گذار دقت وفناوریتون

  • @dhiaeeddine787
    @dhiaeeddine787 7 лет назад +16

    GE its the real industrial leader

    • @chreinisch
      @chreinisch 4 года назад

      only after they bought an Austrian company :-)

  • @warnfreezer
    @warnfreezer 5 лет назад +24

    I just hear corporate jargon and no actual engineering facts

  • @chikojee11
    @chikojee11 Год назад

    very proud to be part of this organization in 2014 till 2019

  • @mrehmanmaqbool5195
    @mrehmanmaqbool5195 7 лет назад +8

    I feel happy to see the work of GE 9HA.1 turbine in Pakistan.

  • @icejoticxzful
    @icejoticxzful 7 лет назад +4

    Power up the world GE.

  • @NikoxD93
    @NikoxD93 6 лет назад +8

    That's how GE benefits from solar energy... Increased demand for gas turbines to stabilise the electric network.

    • @greekgodx6560
      @greekgodx6560 4 года назад +4

      ? If they weren't using solar energy they would use far more and larger gas turbines. Your logic is flawed.

    • @tshilidzimadzhege4949
      @tshilidzimadzhege4949 3 года назад

      Now everyone is buying batteries instead

    • @miceskin
      @miceskin Год назад

      Don't forget wind

    • @NikoxD93
      @NikoxD93 Год назад

      No my logic isn't flawed. Intermittent sources of energy needs gas turbines to stabilise because they can turn on and off quickly. And batteries are too expensive for the task.@@greekgodx6560

  • @mrsbombardier
    @mrsbombardier 4 года назад +3

    Beautiful technology!!

  • @jitterz0135
    @jitterz0135 6 лет назад +3

    Would this turbine be able to be used in a maritime application such as large container ships and tankers?

    • @liveinfra6820
      @liveinfra6820 4 года назад +2

      No , These are very very complex machinery and they produce power that will be too much for a ship !!

    • @Jemalacane0
      @Jemalacane0 4 года назад

      @@liveinfra6820 Some ships are powered by nuclear reactors. So...

    • @Jemalacane0
      @Jemalacane0 4 года назад

      @@liveinfra6820 I don't have the energy to address why what you said is idiotic.

    • @carl8790
      @carl8790 3 года назад +1

      I know, late reply.
      Yes, well not this particular turbine, because it's too large, but a 50 - 80MW example can theoretically work in those applications.

    • @hmesli6901
      @hmesli6901 2 года назад

      Yes they exist for that specific use. They are called LM units (Land & Marine)
      The one in this video is called Heavy Duty gas turbine (HDGT) producing some 500 MW or so, it is a way too big.

  • @asharriaz321
    @asharriaz321 6 лет назад +1

    Good Experience to Work on 9HA frame in Pakistan.
    Allhamdulillah

  • @mrblack9791
    @mrblack9791 2 года назад

    is it water cooled hmm

  • @abolama8664
    @abolama8664 2 года назад +1

    Does gas burn none efficient for a missed component. Or less O2

    • @hmesli6901
      @hmesli6901 2 года назад

      Abo Lama, ? ? I am Gas Turbine specialist, I can answer your question, but if I could understand it: seriously what do you mean?

  • @vikas2435
    @vikas2435 5 лет назад +1

    Even India needs them

  • @linuxguy1199
    @linuxguy1199 4 года назад +1

    How much are these? I want one for charging my phone, also do you guys have a pocket sized version? It would be really inconvenient to carry one of these around everywhere.

    • @K-Effect
      @K-Effect 4 года назад

      About the size of a bic lighter would be perfect.

    • @baronvonchickenpants6564
      @baronvonchickenpants6564 4 года назад

      @@K-Effect imagine a forty thousand horse power Bic

  • @marcoferman2005
    @marcoferman2005 6 лет назад +1

    they are a great efficiency energy plants,we are trying to develop that area in centralamerica

  • @_6666-
    @_6666- 3 года назад

    What does this have to do with CHINA & PAKISTAN ?

  • @gregcollins3404
    @gregcollins3404 7 лет назад +6

    How about delivering on the promise of Thorium powered molten salt reactors? A power source that is even more powerful and sustainable.

    • @evanontheregular3491
      @evanontheregular3491 6 лет назад +2

      Worrrrrd

    • @andreweppink4498
      @andreweppink4498 2 года назад +1

      Lot of problems with molten Na. Leaks are catastrophic. Everybody wants heat xfr at lower pressures than water/steam. But it's not easy. Lot of problems.

  • @richardbearden7889
    @richardbearden7889 5 лет назад +2

    And add a Sterling engine on the exhaust heat exchanger and you can increase efficiency even greater...just use several step system and it could possibly push 85% efficiency. Then mix in an HHO fuel system and your reducing things further...why can't that be done these days.

    • @richardbearden7889
      @richardbearden7889 5 лет назад +1

      @Aleksas S steam is only about a 24% efficiency...what I'm talking about is in addition to the steam system...a sterling engine can use melting ice to generate electricity...all it needs is changing temperature from hot to cold or cold to hot.

    • @richardbearden7889
      @richardbearden7889 5 лет назад

      @Aleksas S there's already systems for plug and play for any level of exhaust heat. They could be used on boilers ect.

    • @olivier8223
      @olivier8223 2 года назад +4

      ​@@richardbearden7889 its not that simple buddy. Maybe persue an engineering career and you will find out kid.

    • @richardbearden7889
      @richardbearden7889 2 года назад

      @@olivier8223 your going to hell...Acts 2:38 is your answer...since you like blunt information that works.

  • @VibratingDolphinNow
    @VibratingDolphinNow 7 лет назад +10

    Where can I get one of these?!

    • @GEPower
      @GEPower  7 лет назад +24

      Hope you need A LOT of power! powergen.gepower.com/products/heavy-duty-gas-turbines/9ha-gas-turbine.html

    • @DSAK55
      @DSAK55 7 лет назад +3

      Grainger

  • @yousifreda10
    @yousifreda10 4 года назад

    What means egv please??

  • @chrisperry9002
    @chrisperry9002 Год назад

    I worked there. Pretty cool stuff.

  • @uarabey6563
    @uarabey6563 Год назад +1

    Amazing content, great job!

  • @jimpikoulis6726
    @jimpikoulis6726 6 лет назад

    I want one.... Need to modify it so I can put a kick ass turbo...

  • @areaofspaceflight
    @areaofspaceflight 2 года назад +1

    SMH I need that turbine now because 62.22% Is closer to 69% efficiency.
    but I don't have money😭 rip

  • @stars4alam0071
    @stars4alam0071 2 года назад

    Thanks sir
    👍

  • @atracamoniusvlogs
    @atracamoniusvlogs 6 месяцев назад +1

    GE's to dubai expo energy

  • @cowboybob7093
    @cowboybob7093 6 лет назад

    Burning something to boil water to spin a shaft.
    Burning something to spin a shaft.
    Guess which one is more efficient?

    • @MrSunrise-
      @MrSunrise- 6 лет назад +12

      Wrong question, Cowboy. The stated 62.22% efficiency in the video is for combined cycle, which is burning something to spin a shaft, and then using the exhaust to boil water to spin a shaft.

    • @justinbiggs1005
      @justinbiggs1005 5 лет назад

      Obviously burning something to spin a shaft because this turbine not only generates direct power but also uses it's exhaust gases to boil water to spin steam turbines that also create power.

  • @pemersatubangsa8999
    @pemersatubangsa8999 4 года назад +1

    2.300.000 horse power engine

  • @hansemist
    @hansemist 5 лет назад

    They should keep researching!

  • @henrickrw
    @henrickrw 7 лет назад +2

    Awesome

  • @syarifulhadi4519
    @syarifulhadi4519 6 лет назад +1

    awesome

  • @scraftbutgood545
    @scraftbutgood545 2 года назад

    LOVE IT

  • @randomvideosn0where
    @randomvideosn0where 5 лет назад

    The music was a bit much on this. It would be nice to hear more about how it actually works too instead of just generic corporate speak.

  • @energiadomagoeremita
    @energiadomagoeremita 3 года назад +1

    Facebook school electric vehicles: Vinícius Ortega Berdinat

  • @jasons44
    @jasons44 4 года назад

    GE should make better appliances take more time on them

  • @manojutsavutsav6634
    @manojutsavutsav6634 2 года назад

    「上記のギフトのいずれかを選択できます」、

  • @saminaanjum9429
    @saminaanjum9429 4 года назад +1

    Pakistan 🇵🇰 😍😍😍😍❤️❤️❤️❤️

  • @jacsonjames
    @jacsonjames Год назад

    Kinda unbelievable tbh

  • @digranni128
    @digranni128 6 лет назад

    Not aircraft 😒

  • @lonely81331
    @lonely81331 6 месяцев назад

    已經7年了 仍然不成熟的產品…

  • @alexsis8980
    @alexsis8980 5 лет назад

    This turbine itself is a development NASA 1970s technologies, you ascribe a lot to yourself.

  • @jimvetromila4562
    @jimvetromila4562 5 лет назад +1

    The U.S. uses almost 4 trillion gigawatts per year. Lets see you get that kind of power on solar and Unicorn farts. 😆😆

  • @tkabbary
    @tkabbary 6 лет назад

    GE gas turbines is the worst turbines , we have many GE turbines in Egypt all of them have many troubles.
    We have 6 new turbines ,installed from 6 years only, in Giza North power plant 3 of them needs new shafts and casing alignment !!!!!!

    • @hmesli6901
      @hmesli6901 2 года назад

      Sorry to hear that bro!!

  • @anhdo5778
    @anhdo5778 5 лет назад

    Why do you develop this fuel burning power plan instead of advancing the renewable energy technologies? Gas turbine should only be used in airplanes.