Namaste Ma'am It has been always good to listen to you n now I experienced topic clearly , in all forms n thank you very much for this video. Wating for another grammar topic Thank you🙏
Mam one have doubt tht , I have seen sometimes in past continous tense some sentence using verb 3rd form with was/were , but it is mentioned that was were always take ing with them plz clear my doubt....
was + V3 is not past continuous. The continuous tense need an -ing form of the verb. It is not even a past perfect tense. That takes the verb 'had' not 'was'. the verb was + pp or V3 is the passive past tense. e.g. The rat was killed by the cat.
Ma'am a doubt in reported speech. In sentences where we have two verbs in the past, do we change both to past perfect tense? For eg . He said, "She went off with the ladder while I was cutting this branch." Will it be He said that she had gone off with the ladder while he was cutting that branch Or He said that she had gone away with the ladder while he had been cutting that branch. Please explain as there is a lot of confusion in this
The second one. The back shift takes place in both tenses. The original went off (past) becomes had gone off ( past perfect ); and was cutting (past continuous) becoes had been cutting (past perfect continuous). No confusion. The meaning of the original must not change. In this case, both have been shifted back in time.
Hello ma’am. How do I change the statement ‘she had fever yesterday’ into a question ? ‘had she a fever yesterday ?’ -can this be written instead of ‘did she have a fever yesterday?’
1))If you don't sleep ,you get tired.2))If you didn't sleep ,you would get tired.what is the meaning of these two sentences?where first one is zero conditional and 2nd one is 2nd conditional.could any one explain these two sentences meaning?If you could,I shall be greatful to you🙏🙏.In this 2nd conditional sentense here , is subject not going to sleep at the present moment?
The first one is a general truth - 0 conditional; and the second one is unreal 2nd conditional as it has not happened but is imagined. didn't sleep is past action, and future possibility - both unreal.
Very informative video
Thanks
Great feast for us . After a long time waiting for your videos
Thank you. I know you have been asking for this.
I love the way you teach.
Thanks a lot
Thank you very much.
You are welcome!
Thank you❤
You're welcome 😊
Very helpful video ma'am..thanks a lot🙏💐
Most welcome 😊
Always a good experience with your classes, teacher.
Thank you! 😃
Namaste Ma'am
It has been always good to listen to you n now I experienced topic clearly , in all forms n thank you very much for this video. Wating for another grammar topic
Thank you🙏
Will come soon. Thanks.
Madam, in case of 2nd conditional, the main clause will be would + Infinitive OR would + main verb??
Give me an example to understand your question.
Mam one have doubt tht , I have seen sometimes in past continous tense some sentence using verb 3rd form with was/were , but it is mentioned that was were always take ing with them plz clear my doubt....
was + V3 is not past continuous. The continuous tense need an -ing form of the verb. It is not even a past perfect tense. That takes the verb 'had' not 'was'. the verb was + pp or V3 is the passive past tense. e.g. The rat was killed by the cat.
@@TheMindspringsEnglishTeacher passive past tense what is it I don't even heard of it before ....can you plz explain
Ma'am a doubt in reported speech. In sentences where we have two verbs in the past, do we change both to past perfect tense?
For eg .
He said, "She went off with the ladder while I was cutting this branch."
Will it be
He said that she had gone off with the ladder while he was cutting that branch
Or
He said that she had gone away with the ladder while he had been cutting that branch.
Please explain as there is a lot of confusion in this
The second one. The back shift takes place in both tenses. The original went off (past) becomes had gone off ( past perfect ); and was cutting (past continuous) becoes had been cutting (past perfect continuous). No confusion. The meaning of the original must not change. In this case, both have been shifted back in time.
Thank you so much
If you didn't sleep ,you would get tired.Respected Mam,could you please tell me the exact meaning behind this 2nd conditional sentence?
Ma'am I admire u a lot please tell me how can I become a fluent speaker in English
ruclips.net/video/6DUFs7ykKQw/видео.html
Hello ma’am. How do I change the statement ‘she had fever yesterday’ into a question ? ‘had she a fever yesterday ?’ -can this be written instead of ‘did she have a fever yesterday?’
No. Had she a fever is incorrect. You have to use the did structure.
What about ‘Sheela had no money in her purse.’ Can the question form be ‘Had Sheela no money in her purse ?’
Good evening madam, im preparing for competitive exams, you Can suggest one grammar book fr us please mam
I have a basic book Grammar with Ease and then a series called Language with Ease of which book 5 to 7 could be useful practice.
1))If you don't sleep ,you get tired.2))If you didn't sleep ,you would get tired.what is the meaning of these two sentences?where first one is zero conditional and 2nd one is 2nd conditional.could any one explain these two sentences meaning?If you could,I shall be greatful to you🙏🙏.In this 2nd conditional sentense here , is subject not going to sleep at the present moment?
The first one is a general truth - 0 conditional; and the second one is unreal 2nd conditional as it has not happened but is imagined. didn't sleep is past action, and future possibility - both unreal.
thank you so much..mam🙏🙏🙏