debateable. Have an Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra silver dial . Its an absolute beauty. Could get 2 of these for 1 of this so. The only difference is an Omega logo instead of Rolex crown logo lol
I indeed actually have and then sold a 36mm aqua Terra - didn’t fully bond with it so moved it on after 18 months, but you are right in it could have been the ultimate one and done watch as well at a far lower price point. Around 1k!
As an owner of this exact model I must agree with you in almost every point. Especially with the accuracy of the movement, I made the same observations. Not a single second deviation while on the wrist and about a second plus or minus otherwise. Love mine so much
An awesome time piece! Explorer 36 , submariner, 5610 g shock = my perfect 3 watch collection. The trouble is my collection is at 50 pieces and I only have one wrist 😂
Someone who enjoys this watch and brand for the right reasons. You are the opposite of the "nouveau riche" mentality that doesn't know anything about watches but gets Rolex to be flashy. Refreshing to see younger guys with your mindset! Love your channel!
I have this 36mm watch too and agree with everything you said. It does wear smaller than I expected but I love it and my 38mm Omega Aqua Terra now looks a bit too big whereas I previously thought it was the perfect size. My copy loses about 2 secs a day when in a watch winder and about 1 sec a day on the wrist, although I’ve never worn it continuously for more than a week because I’m forcing myself to wear my other watches
Great review. I can verify everything you stated about the Explorer. In the 18 years I have worn mine, it has seen multiple adventures, whether on a mountain peak, or scuba diving in places throughout the world. Besides its Everest pedigree, it was worn by Ian Fleming when he wrote the James Bond novels. It is a great under the radar watch, but if someone recognizes your wearing one, it will open doors for you.
I have a few complains about this watch. I'd star with the 19mm lug width, the strange shape of the case where it meets the end link and the proximity of the spring bars to that case. It will try to eat any leather strap you put unless using very thin ones if possible with curved end links. About legibility is ok if you have good eyesight. With aging eyes you will struggle in poor lightning conditions specially during 11 to 1. The text and logo at the 12 is too bold and prominent and out of focus will make you doubt what time it is. On the other hand, the shinny applied indices can be confusing when trying to check the time at a glance. Another complain is that, gives it's supposed to be an "adventure" watch, it will scratch only by blinking near it. One minor thing is that instead of the easy link extension, this should have an on the fly micro adjust instead.
How well does the dial read at 36mm? For reference I have GMT BLNR. I’m really interested in this watch but wonder if the dial is just to small from a legibility perspective.
@@ToolwatchBoutique My theory is that Rolex are purists. Everything must serve a particular function. Glidelock is their answer to the issue of having a diver’s watch over a wetsuit. Same as the similar extension systems on the Seadwellers and Deepsea watches. GMTs, Airkings, Explorers and Daytonas will never get Glidelock as Rolex don’t see why they would need to be over a dive suit. Tudor is allowed to give us what we want, and they put the T-Fit on the Ranger, BB Pro and Pelagos 39 etc. Tudor is allowed to experiment and give us convenience. But Rolex is purist and stubborn. Glidelock should be on all professional models.
I feel the same about this with my Black Bay 54. It's a proper GADA that suits up or down and that timing bezel is so useful for day to day Terra Firma activities. Beautiful, just beautiful.
5 месяцев назад+2
I had some gripes until I bought the watch. I must say, it is outstanding piece. Perfect size, perfect fit, under the radar. The most comfortable watch I own.
Great video, very happy with my 36mm Explorer it is the perfect do anything go anywhere watch for any collection. The only improvement I would make would be adding glide-lock adjustment to the bracelet, that’s it. It’s awesome!
Nice video. Does the watch in video have a minor dent on the bezel around 4 o'clock area? How easy would it fix it or even replace the bezel if you want to? Thanks. I ask bc i have a similar situation on mine.
It does have one. I wouldn’t fix it the dent is a good thing it means you wear your watch like you should. I’m not sure how much it would be to replace it. Probably $1k plus if I had to guess
i sold my DJ6 for this......just goes with everything and any situation watch. And the best thing about it, it keeps eyes away, unless its a watch person.
I have this...its my third year with the watch....i still find myself staring at the dial..quite often it has to be said...dont care about and smack people talk on line about this watch...i f****** love it...and thats all that matters
Who talks smack about this watch? where are they? Let‘s go knock their lights out. Seriously though, what do people say about it? I haven’t heard of that yet. I think the only bad thing one could say about it is that it‘s „boring“ or some idiots might suggest „couldn’t you save up enough dough for a sub“ or is that „the only professional model you could get“ I‘m an explorer lover, so I disagree.
New 36 is and feels small even on smaller wrists because of the dainty bracelet . Best 36 explorer by far 114270 second the 14270. I had all of them ! Currently I have the 40 224270 which i also I’m not that crazy ! In conclusion if someone wants the feeling of classic explorer buy the older version. If has really big wrist go for the 39mkii. Proof of my saying is how easy you can find it way bellow retail allready. Nice Video though !
Ah young padawan, you've much to experience. I started my Rolex journey with the Explorer about 13 years and a couple hundred luxury watches ago. I've now graduated up to two-tone Sub bluesy. My similarly styled IWC's and Omega's now fill the role that the Explorer once did. It surely is a beautiful rabbit hole.
The only thing I wouls change is the clasp and lug width. It should be 20mm with a wider clasp, then it would be perfect. If I were to really get my way, bring back the 1016 font shape for the numerals.
I absolutely agree about the bracelet and clasp. My only gripe. That being said, I don’t worry about it when wearing it and i still absolutely love (almost) everything about this watch. As for the round numerals, I wonder what it would look lile with the white gold indeces and glossy dial. It would be cool if somebody photoshopped one. Though I feel like it wouldn’t have the same charm as the painted numerals on matte dial. Then again, the BB58 bronze has round numerals and they‘re nice😃🤔
Slight correction: Rolex USED to make watches for people who do things. Not many people are using a $7.5k luxury watch as a tool to climb mountains anymore. Rolex is the Harley Davidson of the watch world.
They are MARKETED to people that do things. I'm not saying this as a slight, it's amazing that rolex almost single handed has kept mechanical watches alive. You can't win are functionality argument against a g-shock or phone.
The lume sucks compared to what? Are you sure the lume actually sucks or do you just think that it sucks because you‘re comparing it to the lume on something like a Sub that has bigger indeces? To me the lume is normal. I feel like my DJ has less than my Explorer for this reason.
@@Bisley1 There is no need to compare the 124270 to any other watch. If you are happy with your 124270 then that is great. But, for me, the lack of Lume was a major turnoff and the reason I dumped it. That, and the 19mm lug width where the lug holes are so damn close to the case.
This is the most boring watch because when you get it you lose interest in the other watches you own. No flaws, just perfect
The ultimate sell the rest and just go with this one watch
debateable. Have an Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra silver dial . Its an absolute beauty. Could get 2 of these for 1 of this so. The only difference is an Omega logo instead of Rolex crown logo lol
I indeed actually have and then sold a 36mm aqua Terra - didn’t fully bond with it so moved it on after 18 months, but you are right in it could have been the ultimate one and done watch as well at a far lower price point. Around 1k!
@@mysterio5837I think the Seamaster is the better deal. Unless you want 36mm and/or a Rolex.
I have the 40mm version and haven’t worn any other watches in my collection since purchasing it. I love it!
As an owner of this exact model I must agree with you in almost every point. Especially with the accuracy of the movement, I made the same observations. Not a single second deviation while on the wrist and about a second plus or minus otherwise. Love mine so much
An awesome time piece!
Explorer 36 , submariner, 5610 g shock = my perfect 3 watch collection. The trouble is my collection is at 50 pieces and I only have one wrist 😂
Someone who enjoys this watch and brand for the right reasons. You are the opposite of the "nouveau riche" mentality that doesn't know anything about watches but gets Rolex to be flashy. Refreshing to see younger guys with your mindset! Love your channel!
For size reference, would you please share your wrist size?
I own an Air King purchased new in the 90s, it’s still a stunning watch to look at and keeps great time.
I have this 36mm watch too and agree with everything you said. It does wear smaller than I expected but I love it and my 38mm Omega Aqua Terra now looks a bit too big whereas I previously thought it was the perfect size. My copy loses about 2 secs a day when in a watch winder and about 1 sec a day on the wrist, although I’ve never worn it continuously for more than a week because I’m forcing myself to wear my other watches
I love my 2022 36mm explorer! Great video!
Great review. I can verify everything you stated about the Explorer. In the 18 years I have worn mine, it has seen multiple adventures, whether on a mountain peak, or scuba diving in places throughout the world. Besides its Everest pedigree, it was worn by Ian Fleming when he wrote the James Bond novels. It is a great under the radar watch, but if someone recognizes your wearing one, it will open doors for you.
I had mine since 1985, for me it’s the perfect watch for any occasion.
Exceptional timepiece. Great video!
I have a few complains about this watch. I'd star with the 19mm lug width, the strange shape of the case where it meets the end link and the proximity of the spring bars to that case. It will try to eat any leather strap you put unless using very thin ones if possible with curved end links. About legibility is ok if you have good eyesight. With aging eyes you will struggle in poor lightning conditions specially during 11 to 1. The text and logo at the 12 is too bold and prominent and out of focus will make you doubt what time it is. On the other hand, the shinny applied indices can be confusing when trying to check the time at a glance. Another complain is that, gives it's supposed to be an "adventure" watch, it will scratch only by blinking near it. One minor thing is that instead of the easy link extension, this should have an on the fly micro adjust instead.
How well does the dial read at 36mm? For reference I have GMT BLNR.
I’m really interested in this watch but wonder if the dial is just to small from a legibility perspective.
I also love this watch. The only change I wish they'd make is to use the glide lock bracelet that they have on the Daytonas and other models.
Daytonas don't have Glidelock. You mean Submariners?
@@the_shadow_realm5110 Oh I thought they did. Ya I just think the Explorer should have the glidelock.
@@the_shadow_realm5110the new oysterflex daytona’s (precious metal ones) have a glide lock system!
This! The Explorer belongs to the Professional line of Rolex, yet does not have a Glidelock. Bit of a miss on Rolex's side here
@@ToolwatchBoutique My theory is that Rolex are purists. Everything must serve a particular function.
Glidelock is their answer to the issue of having a diver’s watch over a wetsuit. Same as the similar extension systems on the Seadwellers and Deepsea watches.
GMTs, Airkings, Explorers and Daytonas will never get Glidelock as Rolex don’t see why they would need to be over a dive suit.
Tudor is allowed to give us what we want, and they put the T-Fit on the Ranger, BB Pro and Pelagos 39 etc. Tudor is allowed to experiment and give us convenience. But Rolex is purist and stubborn.
Glidelock should be on all professional models.
Great video. Makes me want one now!
Amazing watch my friend. Do you prefer the Oyster perpetual or the Explorer?
Looks great! For reference, what size is your wrist?
I feel the same about this with my Black Bay 54. It's a proper GADA that suits up or down and that timing bezel is so useful for day to day Terra Firma activities. Beautiful, just beautiful.
I had some gripes until I bought the watch. I must say, it is outstanding piece. Perfect size, perfect fit, under the radar. The most comfortable watch I own.
My grail watch ! Great video
Great video, very happy with my 36mm Explorer it is the perfect do anything go anywhere watch for any collection. The only improvement I would make would be adding glide-lock adjustment to the bracelet, that’s it. It’s awesome!
Can you share your wrist size so we have a frame of comparison?
I have never been disappointed since I became a customer of gussl. Their timepieces are of exceptional quality.
Nice video. Does the watch in video have a minor dent on the bezel around 4 o'clock area? How easy would it fix it or even replace the bezel if you want to? Thanks. I ask bc i have a similar situation on mine.
It does have one. I wouldn’t fix it the dent is a good thing it means you wear your watch like you should. I’m not sure how much it would be to replace it. Probably $1k plus if I had to guess
Just take it to the AD for a quote or ask them to get rid of it for you the next time you send it in for servicing
Every Rolex watch is a perfect watch.
I have a 40mm Explorer and it’s the daily driver.
Amazing watch!!!
I'm torn between this, or going for a two tone Datejust as my next one. Hmm......
More videos my man, keep it up!
Great video. Now I am going to buy this one!
Fits you really well.
Landed here because of RUclips Algo, and am quite happy, great review, could you just share your wrist size, it looks bellow 6.5 inches..
It’s a great watch. Classic perfection.
Great review! Started my hunt for it.
PS You look like Richard Harrow in Boardwalk Empire
love your content, love from india
That model is awesome
Excellent review!
i sold my DJ6 for this......just goes with everything and any situation watch. And the best thing about it, it keeps eyes away, unless its a watch person.
Your wrist size?
Got one 36 mm . Love it
I have this...its my third year with the watch....i still find myself staring at the dial..quite often it has to be said...dont care about and smack people talk on line about this watch...i f****** love it...and thats all that matters
Who talks smack about this watch? where are they? Let‘s go knock their lights out.
Seriously though, what do people say about it? I haven’t heard of that yet. I think the only bad thing one could say about it is that it‘s „boring“ or some idiots might suggest „couldn’t you save up enough dough for a sub“ or is that „the only professional model you could get“
I‘m an explorer lover, so I disagree.
@@Bisley1 basically idiors say its s womans watch due to its size
Hello, that's a small wrist. Wish i could wear it in 36 so good
New 36 is and feels small even on smaller wrists because of the dainty bracelet . Best 36 explorer by far 114270 second the 14270. I had all of them ! Currently I have the 40 224270 which i also I’m not that crazy ! In conclusion if someone wants the feeling of classic explorer buy the older version. If has really big wrist go for the 39mkii. Proof of my saying is how easy you can find it way bellow retail allready. Nice Video though !
great watch but i dislike the broad numerals. I wish they went with a more classic arabic numeral like the 1016
isn't the clasp way too bulky?
Good watch, but the price is nuts.
Its pretty much a simple decent looking watch.
Not for beginers but those who hv used the other high end variants and want smtgh simple
Ah young padawan, you've much to experience. I started my Rolex journey with the Explorer about 13 years and a couple hundred luxury watches ago. I've now graduated up to two-tone Sub bluesy. My similarly styled IWC's and Omega's now fill the role that the Explorer once did. It surely is a beautiful rabbit hole.
2:45 rolex makes watches for people that do things…🎉
same Thoughts
This watch is just the starting point of climbing the Rolex Mount Everest. Still a long way to go.
The only thing I wouls change is the clasp and lug width. It should be 20mm with a wider clasp, then it would be perfect. If I were to really get my way, bring back the 1016 font shape for the numerals.
I absolutely agree about the bracelet and clasp. My only gripe. That being said, I don’t worry about it when wearing it and i still absolutely love (almost) everything about this watch.
As for the round numerals, I wonder what it would look lile with the white gold indeces and glossy dial. It would be cool if somebody photoshopped one. Though I feel like it wouldn’t have the same charm as the painted numerals on matte dial. Then again, the BB58 bronze has round numerals and they‘re nice😃🤔
The only thing better than a new Explorer? An older Explorer!
Thats the 36?? You must have a really small wrist
The Rolex Explorer is simple and effective just like this video.
FYI: no Rolex made it to the summit of Everest with Hillary. Rolex apologized decades ago about making that claim. Hillary was wearing a Smiths.
I have this watch and I stopped wearing other watches and I sold them off.
It was the smith that went to Mount Everst not Rolex. The new Smith is rip off 😂.
Slight correction: Rolex USED to make watches for people who do things. Not many people are using a $7.5k luxury watch as a tool to climb mountains anymore. Rolex is the Harley Davidson of the watch world.
They’re meant to do things whether you think they’re overly expensive or not.
They are MARKETED to people that do things. I'm not saying this as a slight, it's amazing that rolex almost single handed has kept mechanical watches alive. You can't win are functionality argument against a g-shock or phone.
The lume on this watch sucks! I bought and sold my 124270 because it wears so damn small, 19mm lug width, and poor lume.
The lume sucks compared to what? Are you sure the lume actually sucks or do you just think that it sucks because you‘re comparing it to the lume on something like a Sub that has bigger indeces? To me the lume is normal. I feel like my DJ has less than my Explorer for this reason.
@@Bisley1 There is no need to compare the 124270 to any other watch. If you are happy with your 124270 then that is great. But, for me, the lack of Lume was a major turnoff and the reason I dumped it. That, and the 19mm lug width where the lug holes are so damn close to the case.
Smith was not a homage to Rolex….
It is though
Replace boring with UNDER THE RADAR, just like a spy jet in the sky
New friend here sending may full suppor NKUWAN
I got the the 40 Explorer 🧭 and it wears perfectly on my arm