When documentary makers told a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, without flashy gimmicks aimed at people with the attention span of a three year old.
Yeh, a lot of documentaries these days seem obsessed with Christopher Nolan-ing the timeline of the subject. It can be an interesting dramatic technique every so often, but often becomes a tedious and confusing trope.
i know Im asking the wrong place but does anybody know of a way to log back into an Instagram account?? I somehow lost my account password. I would appreciate any tricks you can give me
@Xander Kashton i really appreciate your reply. I got to the site thru google and Im trying it out now. Seems to take quite some time so I will reply here later with my results.
As an Australian supporter, I can say that this guy was the consummate all-rounder. People say that Miller and Sobers were the best. It may surprise many people that his Test record was immeasurably superior to Miller and only slightly inferior to Sobers. He opened both the batting and the bowling with great success in international cricket and has long been regarded as possibly the greatest slip fielder of all time. Would love to have seen him in this era of 20/20 cricket. The best of the best
Your words capture the man beautifully, and what a fine trio of cricketers, all incomparable. I think what needs to be remembered about Hammond is that he played well beyond his use by date which had an adverse affect on his statistics. Hammond before the war was by far the best batsman of the three, in my opinion better than Sobers in his prime. These are extraordinarily high standards.
No sorry. Rubbish! He was as great a batsman as Sobers and a considerably better batsman than Millar, but he didn't compare to Millar as a bowler and certainly wasn't as good a bowler as Sobers either. True about his fielding. However, he was in the great batting all-rounder class who was under bowled probably. Even so, look at his test record. If I remember correctly, 80 odd wickets at 37. That's more in the Steve Waugh kind of class, and he was medium to medium quick to. Similar again to Waugh, as opposed to being quick. Brilliant all-rounder? Yes! In the Sobers or Millar class as an all-rounder? No! He was nevertheless one of the greatest batsmen of all time! One of the greatest slip fielders of all time to.
@@kennethcrowther2277 Spot on. You remembered correctly. I doubt if he was a better allround fielder than Sobers, either. Not because he wasnt a great slip fielder but because Sobers was a sensational fielder at all positions. I cant say about Miller.
Peter West with pipe in hand... legendary presenter. Note that they didn't bother to mention that only 'amateur' players were allowed to captain England until the 1950s; this documentary was made in 1987, so I think it deserved a brief explanation.
Charlie Barnett as peppery as ever, although an admirer Hammond the cricketer. In his biography of Hammond, David Foot's comments about "Charles" are enlightening, including Barnett's involvement with this documentary.
As in other docs I've seen I find Bradman's comments very fair despite Hutton's sense that there was an animus between Hammond and Bradman. I think it's fair to call Hammond the English Bradman with due deference to Hutton, who was no slouch.
Enjoyed watching this, yes he was a fine cricketer, with a great record. But comparing the older game to the modern one: they played on uncovered pitches so probably had to hone their batting skills, but the bowling seemed to be not as fast and aggressive as todays (with the exception of bodyline in 1932-33).
@@dlamiss Nobody competes with his bowling catching and fielding. Least of all his batting. The man was a phenomena. Easily the greatest cricketer of all time.
Think how many more tests he would have played and runs he woild have scored if not for the second world war, he might still hold the English run scoring record.
The Greatest #XI of All Time 1 Jack Hobbs 2 Len Hutton 3 Don Bradman (Cap.) 4 Sachin Tendulkar 5 Viv Richards 6 Gary Sobers 7 Adam Gilchrist (W/K) 8 Shane Warne 9 Wasim Akram 10 Malcolm Marshall 11 Sydney Barnes 12th : W.G Grace. Substitutes: ( George Headley , Brian Lara , Imran Khan , Muttiah Muralitharan , Dennis Lillee ) Manager :- Sir Frank Worrell .
Viv Richards is in 41st position as a test batsman based on stats. He might get into the third or fourth team but you are letting his prowess as a one day player colour your judgement. Sobers, Headley and Weekes are not just better than Richards ; they are much better. And that's just the West Indians!
@@colddiesel If Viv Richards was a selfish batsmen he could of averaged 60 easily he gave his wicket away on so many occasions. Stats meant nothing to free flowing stroke makers who take risks.
As an all round player, he 'was' better than Bradman, quite frankly. Hammond was a very useful bowler, and was probably the best fielder in history. A genuine all rounder. Who just happened to average 60 with the bat! He was a very good football and tennis player as well. A man of many m,any talents.
When documentary makers told a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, without flashy gimmicks aimed at people with the attention span of a three year old.
Yeh, a lot of documentaries these days seem obsessed with Christopher Nolan-ing the timeline of the subject. It can be an interesting dramatic technique every so often, but often becomes a tedious and confusing trope.
Thank you, nice to see this footage of my grandfather. Didn’t know much about him
i know Im asking the wrong place but does anybody know of a way to log back into an Instagram account??
I somehow lost my account password. I would appreciate any tricks you can give me
@Alexis Roman instablaster =)
@Xander Kashton i really appreciate your reply. I got to the site thru google and Im trying it out now.
Seems to take quite some time so I will reply here later with my results.
@Xander Kashton it did the trick and I actually got access to my account again. I'm so happy!
Thank you so much, you saved my ass :D
@Alexis Roman no problem :D
As an Australian supporter, I can say that this guy was the consummate all-rounder. People say that Miller and Sobers were the best. It may surprise many people that his Test record was immeasurably superior to Miller and only slightly inferior to Sobers. He opened both the batting and the bowling with great success in international cricket and has long been regarded as possibly the greatest slip fielder of all time. Would love to have seen him in this era of 20/20 cricket. The best of the best
Your words capture the man beautifully, and what a fine trio of cricketers, all incomparable. I think what needs to be remembered about Hammond is that he played well beyond his use by date which had an adverse affect on his statistics. Hammond before the war was by far the best batsman of the three, in my opinion better than Sobers in his prime. These are extraordinarily high standards.
No sorry. Rubbish! He was as great a batsman as Sobers and a considerably better batsman than Millar, but he didn't compare to Millar as a bowler and certainly wasn't as good a bowler as Sobers either. True about his fielding. However, he was in the great batting all-rounder class who was under bowled probably. Even so, look at his test record. If I remember correctly, 80 odd wickets at 37. That's more in the Steve Waugh kind of class, and he was medium to medium quick to. Similar again to Waugh, as opposed to being quick. Brilliant all-rounder? Yes! In the Sobers or Millar class as an all-rounder? No! He was nevertheless one of the greatest batsmen of all time! One of the greatest slip fielders of all time to.
Yeah but Phil Tufnell was a better spinner.
@@kennethcrowther2277 Spot on. You remembered correctly. I doubt if he was a better allround fielder than Sobers, either. Not because he wasnt a great slip fielder but because Sobers was a sensational fielder at all positions. I cant say about Miller.
Peter West with pipe in hand... legendary presenter. Note that they didn't bother to mention that only 'amateur' players were allowed to captain England until the 1950s; this documentary was made in 1987, so I think it deserved a brief explanation.
Charlie Barnett as peppery as ever, although an admirer Hammond the cricketer. In his biography of Hammond, David Foot's comments about "Charles" are enlightening, including Barnett's involvement with this documentary.
Watching those Zulus dance was mindblowing when you think it was only fifty years after the battle of Rorkes Drift and the defeat at Isandlewhana.
shaka zulu, electric ooga-booga
Thank you for the upload. I love documentaries like this. The older the better.
Glad you liked it! My channel has plenty of other old cricket documentaries which you might also enjoy.
Thank you for uploading.
Such a great player.
Oddly overlooked in the Bodyline series and in the TV series.
BTW he averaged less than Bradman in that series without facing Larwood and Voce bowling bodyline
@@hectorlp1298 I know. Thanks.
Many thanks, it was great to see footage of WH. I have read about him but words are just words.
who bast bardmne
Glad you enjoyed it! Don't miss the many other old cricket documentaries on my channel.
How Cool. My relation. When he toured New Zealand he caught up with my Great Grandfather also named Walter Hammond
As in other docs I've seen I find Bradman's comments very fair despite Hutton's sense that there was an animus between Hammond and Bradman. I think it's fair to call Hammond the English Bradman with due deference to Hutton, who was no slouch.
Enjoyed watching this, yes he was a fine cricketer, with a great record. But comparing the older game to the modern one: they played on uncovered pitches so probably had to hone their batting skills, but the bowling seemed to be not as fast and aggressive as todays (with the exception of bodyline in 1932-33).
The greatest cricketer ever
Im sure Sobers, Richards and Bradman to name but three would disagree
@@dlamiss Nobody competes with his bowling catching and fielding. Least of all his batting. The man was a phenomena. Easily the greatest cricketer of all time.
@@thenazarite2444 I think you will find most of his peers would suggest Sobers was a better cricketer but I accept its all about opinions...
@@dlamiss 🤣🤣🤣
Peter West in his element.
Thanks for this
A sadly overlooked genius.
Yep. I put a question into Geoffrey Boycott about him and he spoke for 10 minutes about him. My favourite cricketer.
John Best - well, not overlooked by “ Boyks” at least !👍
Loved it!
His speaking voice comes as a bit of a surprise, higher pitched than I imagined and also sounding like he must of had elocution lessons.
Charles Barnett clearly disliked Walter Hammond, and his contributions to this documentary strike a rather sour note.
Nice!!
Much appreciated.
You're welcome John. I hope you liked it.
Just thought id let you know Wally is my great great great uncle and im not even joking
I didn’t understand why his fellow cricketer was talking about brown eyes being better than non brown eyes. Is that a thing?
Gay boys in Bondage?
Think how many more tests he would have played and runs he woild have scored if not for the second world war, he might still hold the English run scoring record.
Could also be said about Hutton and Compton
Jack Hobbs lost his best years to the First World War and if he hadn't then his record would have been utterly stupendous.
The Greatest #XI of All Time
1 Jack Hobbs
2 Len Hutton
3 Don Bradman (Cap.)
4 Sachin Tendulkar
5 Viv Richards
6 Gary Sobers
7 Adam Gilchrist (W/K)
8 Shane Warne
9 Wasim Akram
10 Malcolm Marshall
11 Sydney Barnes
12th : W.G Grace.
Substitutes:
( George Headley , Brian Lara , Imran Khan , Muttiah Muralitharan , Dennis Lillee )
Manager :- Sir Frank Worrell .
I don't think Sydney Barnes would object to not getting the new ball in a side like that one!
Viv Richards is in 41st position as a test batsman based on stats. He might get into the third or fourth team but you are letting his prowess as a one day player colour your judgement. Sobers, Headley and Weekes are not just better than Richards ; they are much better. And that's just the West Indians!
@@colddiesel If Viv Richards was a selfish batsmen he could of averaged 60 easily he gave his wicket away on so many occasions. Stats meant nothing to free flowing stroke makers who take risks.
WG Grace wouldn't bother turning up if he knew he was going to be 12th Man.
1.JACK HOBBS 2.BARRY RICHARDS 3.KUMAR SANGAKKARA 4.DON BRADMAN 5. WALLY HAMMOND 6. GARY SOBERS 7. ADAM GILCHRIST 8.WASIM AKRAM 9. MALCOLM MARSHALL 10. SHANE WARNE (CAPT) 11. SYDNEY BARNES
Wally wouldn't have survived DRS at 2:52!
Kashmir willow better than Emglish willow!!!! Funniest thing I've heard in ages.😀😀😀😀😀
I second the thanks. #better than bradman.
As an all round player, he 'was' better than Bradman, quite frankly.
Hammond was a very useful bowler, and was probably the best fielder in history. A genuine all rounder.
Who just happened to average 60 with the bat! He was a very good football and tennis player as well. A man of many m,any talents.
@@lonestar6709 and a good golfer. He had the lot really.
Hammond was miles better than Bradman, who was a complete coward against fast bowling and benefited from biased umpiring in Australia.
So what about the numerous hundreds Bradman scored in England
Ridiculous statement.It's not even close.
Nobody holds a candle to Don Bradman.
Nobody