The Witcher: Path Of Destiny Review!

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 20 янв 2025

Комментарии • 59

  • @Renegade_KT
    @Renegade_KT Год назад +20

    Very good review. Good job Michael! I'm trying to stop backing games, but this one is still tempting. It feels unique in its genre, but I'm so unsure about the gameplay.

  • @p.henrique9088
    @p.henrique9088 Год назад +9

    I have the Old World Witcher game and we love it. The theme is very strong there IMO. About this new game, I am in for now to not miss the 24-hour free gift, but I am still not convinced this is fun. I want to watch a playthrough or 2 before the campaign ends. So far it seems really boring.

  • @CJUzziel
    @CJUzziel Год назад +4

    Once again a great informative video. Thank you for that. I found the style quite different to your usual casual "chat" with the audience about a game or a topic (it will be interesting to see if other users found that this impacted in any way the perceived "trustworthiness" of the opinion expressed). It still contained all the information you would usually present and I liked the pan over all the content. I'm in the camp where I am not invested in the IP like I would with say LOTR, so I'm glad to know that it won't make or break the game. I am however motivated to read the books now before Dec24 ;)

    • @TheKingofAverage
      @TheKingofAverage  Год назад +2

      Yeah that's something I need to still listen to feedback for. I changed my style for reviews a while back but that doesn't mean it's perfect. You are not the first to voice a slight feeling that if I write a script it can perhaps not feel as authentic or honest

    • @ganAlexander
      @ganAlexander Год назад +1

      @@TheKingofAveragecompared to your usual voice, you sound abit sedated. LOL. I guess most of us are used to your previous style. No right or wrong which style you prefer.

  • @enricodenardi8957
    @enricodenardi8957 Год назад +1

    Fantastic preview. Especially what the place of the game in the collection potentially can fill is a wonderful point that I never have heard being discussed, yet. Thanks for the video. Great work

  • @PsychicLord
    @PsychicLord Год назад +2

    An excellent review, I like this style, please continue this with future reviews.

  • @Mattmeetsmeeples
    @Mattmeetsmeeples Год назад +4

    Great review! I am all in on this one. Great price on the deluxe with all the great Witcher figures. Really enjoy this IP in all the forms it has come and can’t wait to get my hands on this one. Keep up the amazing work and long live the King!

  • @timf7354
    @timf7354 Год назад +4

    Thanks for the info. I like that you cover everything but your commentary is a lot slower and more monotone, respectfully. Tone is huge for me. My humble suggestion would be an outline of main points rather than a script. I remember my college speach class starting us out with written scripts we had to read at the podium and eventually getting to index cards with our main points for that segment of the speach. Index cards ordered kept you on the main points then flip to next one for next set of points/material. Anyway, however you decide to land on your review format, ill still watch and read comments.
    Btw, I think the pricing is ok. 3 tales, 45-90 minutes each. From the GF comments, there will be add ons throughout the campaign. Seems like these games come in around $250 all in. Unless you're Dice Throne, then its over $500. So, i mean, compared to other campaigns, the pricing is great! Lol.

  • @CarlWalmsley-j1z
    @CarlWalmsley-j1z Год назад +2

    A good review. The work you clearly put into scripting this review - as opposed to the usual chit-chat - paid dividends. This really helped me to decide whether to back thew campaign. (I did...🙂 )

    • @TheKingofAverage
      @TheKingofAverage  Год назад +1

      Ah thank you for the feedback, that's reassuring. I found often in my old review style I would forget to say things, or not convey the real feeling I had, instead just listing likes and dislikes but leaving the viewer wondering if the game was still for them or not.

  • @SamS-cb5ep
    @SamS-cb5ep Год назад +5

    I cannot put into words how boring the actual gameplay looks.
    Have you been sponsored by go on board? It’s weird how much you have been hyping this up since you got the first exclusive on it.
    Normally you call games like this super boring

  • @genericcartoon
    @genericcartoon Год назад +2

    I'm sure this video took more work to make, but I really enjoyed it. I've casually watched some of your videos, but this is definitely more my style of review.

    • @TheKingofAverage
      @TheKingofAverage  Год назад +1

      Thanks I really appreciate the feedback :) Happy to hear you liked it!

  • @warpaint9385
    @warpaint9385 Год назад +8

    I’ll say three positive things about this.
    It’s reasonably good price which leads me to my second positive. There’s not 100’s of plastic minis which makes this game a lot cheaper.
    Thirdly, they’re using stretch pay.
    Love the Witcher but for me It’s another pass. Not sure I’m interested in a glorified choose your own adventure. Don’t really care about replaying over and over again to try and get different outcomes.
    Would also like to know where’s the combat?
    Don’t usually like card drafting either.
    Your entitled to your opinion but I still say this could’ve been any theme but the Witcher IP sells so there you go. Already plenty people backing it.
    Disagree that it’s a true Witcher game because of story. The combat is an integral part of a Witcher game just like combat is integral to most fantasy rpg’s like D&D.
    I mean it’s fantasy with monsters to kill. Why wouldn’t it be part of the game?
    All characters are depicted holding weapons. Another reason I’m passing.
    Your review of the Old World was pretty positive now your claiming it’s not in the spirit of a true Witcher game. Haven’t gone back to watch it but did you make that statement back then? Not saying you got paid but this is what paid promotion channels do. Talk up games and rarely ever say a game is crap.

  • @Paraboloid0
    @Paraboloid0 Год назад +2

    This was the best review you've put out. I was already heavily inclined to back this and you've helped address most of my concerns. Thanks Michael.

  • @CJUzziel
    @CJUzziel Год назад

    How big of an issue is the initiative track problem of being able to pick first and potentially keep on getting the best cards,or alternatively always getting stuck with picking last?

    • @TheKingofAverage
      @TheKingofAverage  Год назад +2

      The best cards for you might be low on the board. The initiative track position for next turn is based on the spot you get cards from. So you may want to grab the top spot even for bad cards, or perhaps get great cards you need but they are low so you won't go first next time.

    • @CJUzziel
      @CJUzziel Год назад

      @@TheKingofAverage okay thanks

  • @jparish1987
    @jparish1987 Год назад +3

    Did you see they're doing tuck boxes? Your favorite.

  • @SKGuna_writer
    @SKGuna_writer Год назад +3

    Great video! I backed it in the 1st minute when I found out Triss Merigold is a stretch goal. Still came out as a backer in the hundreds. People are too quick. Haha.

  • @mithrandir510
    @mithrandir510 Год назад

    How good is the solo ?

  • @janmoetting1571
    @janmoetting1571 Год назад

    Thx for the video and great review (as always). I do like the visual style of your video, panning over the game and components, too. But please clean up your table, the dirt is very distracting :P

    • @TheKingofAverage
      @TheKingofAverage  Год назад +2

      It's this terrible felt man! Need to find some tool that can clean it. Vacuum won't work 😭

  • @serdalamand1276
    @serdalamand1276 Год назад +1

    Cool review. Looks like I will get it

  • @aSyphodias
    @aSyphodias Год назад +12

    High praise for a game I could not see the appeal whatsoever. I need to see a play through or something because gameplay wise it looks super boring to me.

    • @TheKingofAverage
      @TheKingofAverage  Год назад +1

      I imagine the decision making around what cards to play, or the table talk won't appeal to a fair amount of people. I enjoyed it enough to back it though personally.

  • @MrAbsurdSisyphus
    @MrAbsurdSisyphus Год назад +1

    High praise from you dude. Thank you for your honesty and integrity. I wanted to confirm my prejudice in backing day one.

  • @lawells3
    @lawells3 Год назад

    Great review I enjoyed it and it helped me decide to go ahead and back initially. I would like your take on the Add-on announced yesterday. Here are my thoughts: So, I already pledged DELUXE, and am okay with the price point. I am a little aggravated that Go On Board are offering a SEPARATE add-on that isn't part of the stretch goals. Why not have an ALL-IN, so we know up front what we are going to pay? I'd have been okay with a disclaimer saying content will be revealed as the campaign progressed. It feels a little disingenuous how Go On Board chose to reveal this content. Yes, to the trolls, I know I don't have to get the extra content, but some of us like to plan and budget how we want to spend our cash. This helps creators in the end too.

  • @tbowne05
    @tbowne05 Год назад +1

    How was the actual writing in the game? I found the writing in OLD WORLD to be lacking. It had weird grammar and felt poorly translated at times. Since this is a story based game that would kinda kill it for me.

  • @remconet
    @remconet Год назад

    This game looks beautiful, so my click-finger felt a rush, but somehow it feels like there's not that much to do in this game. And a lot (!) of reading is involved. I want to ask: "How wrong am I?", but I realise that's a very personal question.

  • @califax512
    @califax512 Год назад +1

    Did you find it story driven? From the playthroughs I saw from Go on Board, it seems like a Euro game, play whatever symbols are optimal for your cards and the story is whatever, since you play for victory points and not a story win condition. I am curious if this was different for your plays

    • @TheKingofAverage
      @TheKingofAverage  Год назад +1

      I suppose it depends on what's going on in your head while you play it. Playing as Yennifer it definitely felt like you were manipulating things to turn out how you wanted them for example. You are rewarded for most anything you do and there are several paths to victory.
      So there's nothing wrong with pursuing the path you want. You can produce tokens for both as well. In fact winning and losing some is normal and how you get different story path. The story btw accommodates your attempt and usually rewards you. It takes into account that not everyone is trying to say, attack and will say stuff like "the person who tries to reason with him the most...." And then says to do it get something for it in a thematic way.

  • @Anduril1974
    @Anduril1974 Год назад +1

    I just can't get my head around what this game is. And I'm not at all sure if it's my kind of game as a solo player - which sucks as I'm obsessed with The Witcher video games.

  • @CheddahSlammer
    @CheddahSlammer Год назад

    Just personally don't think the game would work for my group. While I play competitive games all the time, their are certain ones that result in my group being pissed at each other. This makes a fun game night into not so fun. It just get very personal sometimes. Its specifically Narrative based competitive games, and not just competitive games were were competing for a goal.
    As an example in this game, your choices forge the story, and give you different endings, based on your choices. I got players that would only want to see the good endings, and then others that actively would try to sabotage that. I get that's part of the game, but for my group it gets to the point were sometimes players leave pissed off.

  • @ScytheNoire
    @ScytheNoire Год назад

    I love the Witcher franchise, and know these stories, so curious to see how they can change based on decisions made.

    • @TheKingofAverage
      @TheKingofAverage  Год назад

      I was quite surprised how well they pulled that off. They've been working with CD Projekt Red to ensure they get it right "in universe" so to speak.

  • @1AngelAlita
    @1AngelAlita Год назад

    First! I just backed blindly because I really like the minis. I hope it's a good game.. ;)

  • @obsessedrunner
    @obsessedrunner Год назад

    What does IP stand for?

    • @sotbs2641
      @sotbs2641 Год назад +1

      Intellectual Property. in this case, referring to the Witcher universe

  • @boardgamer447
    @boardgamer447 Год назад

    Story tends not to be what I want from playing a board game, so I'm passing on this one despite enjoying the IP a lot.
    I find that games like Destinies just bounce off me, but I remain open to finding a game I like that does something a little different from my usual collection of historically-themed heavy Euros. Not convinced it's this one though.

  • @alexanderpopov3587
    @alexanderpopov3587 Год назад +2

    Looks like choose your adventure game with (optional) miniatures. Low replayability. Weight seems quite light with basic mechanisms like set collection. Milking the IP. Will wait for retail on the inevitable heavy discount.

    • @TheKingofAverage
      @TheKingofAverage  Год назад

      If 24+ sessions is low replicability I fear half my collection is low >.

    • @alexanderpopov3587
      @alexanderpopov3587 Год назад +3

      @@TheKingofAverage It is quite a stretch to call couple of minutes of extra text reading in each game "a different session". It would have been OK if the game had deeper mechanisms attached to the theme, but the core experience is in these stories (unlike in The Witcher Old World). Once these are done, the game is done. Don't get me wrong, I appreciate your review and it helped me make a more informed decision and not back this game. Maybe (hopefully) I am wrong about how interesting and replayable it would be and I may get it for cheaper in retail.

  • @Icewox
    @Icewox Год назад +7

    I actually cancelled my pledge after watching this preview. The "gameplay" looks very boring. Just reading paragraphs in a foreign language in a group is not fun either. And the price of 85 + 22 USD + 25 % VAT = the cost of buying Too Many Bones locally. Or Mage Knight. Or Cascadia + HEAT + Carcasonne + Under Falling Skies.

    • @TheKingofAverage
      @TheKingofAverage  Год назад +3

      Glad I could help you make a good decision for you! :)

  • @andrzejlaba1976
    @andrzejlaba1976 Год назад

    For me you never play this prototype or play not enough. It is just simple euro game, where every player focus on optimize points and nothing else. I can see only one reason exactly to buy it - to place it on the shelf, and maybe sell someday like many other games.

  • @alwaysplaythegame
    @alwaysplaythegame Год назад

    Ha, a reason you say? Not sure about that.

  • @janzavrel6886
    @janzavrel6886 Год назад

    Not my type of a game I think making another witcher game after the old world isnt great to me it seems like milking the IP but seems enough pple interested so hopefully it wont dissapoint them 🙂

  • @garathminis5108
    @garathminis5108 Год назад

    Thank you for the review.
    Hard pass on a pre payment site. Shipping will eat the deal.
    I'll consider it if I can get it in retail

    • @LordVampire1985
      @LordVampire1985 Год назад

      Getting it in retail will be just the base game. Currently, the campaign offers exclusives that will not go to retail and extra's that will be free. Those will go to retail, but will cost you extra AND they will come much later, similar to Old Worls's expansions Adventure Pack, Monster Trail and Wild Hunt. So that is something to consider. Also, you can spread payment for this campaign if you so desire. All in all, I think they're doing a good job on the campaign.

    • @garathminis5108
      @garathminis5108 Год назад +2

      @@LordVampire1985
      I'm not arguing any of that.
      I just found that KS overall is not a thing for me.
      The original idea of it has been long abandoned.
      If the base game is not good in itself ( and it certainly does not seem interesting) , expansions will not help.
      This is my personal view. I buy games always either second hand or at a discount , if I know they're good.

    • @aviranc
      @aviranc Год назад

      @@garathminis5108 Even though 99% of the times I buy board games via KS, I can totally understand that. Lets say out of the first 4 games I bought via KS I enjoyed only 1 out of 4. the next 4 games I enjoyed 3 out of 4. In the next (last) 4 games I received I really enjoyed 100% 4/4. So personally now I am much more accurate now with what games I back, however there is still a certain space that is unknown until delivered and played.