Bugatti Chiron Vs Koenigsegg Agera RST Acceleration Comparison 100-300 km/h

[@Hezzie0]

this was without e85

[@Smzxe]

​@@Hezzie0 again the delusional Fanboys execuses it was running on E85 they showed it filling E85 in the video they did on the comments reviews
Pause the video at 0:50 and at 0:55
the 200-300 km/h time is 5.4 seconds which is similar as Agera RS Nevada Highway Record run or 0-400 kmph where it did 200-300 kmph in 5.2 seconds going downhill in tailwind also mentioned the Nevada higher altitude and thin Air 4 massive advantages
Without E85 200-300 kph gonna be much much slower like over 7 seconds
Agera RS got Chiron from 200-300 kmph it was pulling harder up top
It's clearly on E85

[@RobertPope-RAZ]

I see AGERA RS red is quicker than blue RST
I USE CELLPHONE spilt screen to use RUclips and stopwatch same time.
I tested on stopwatch.
AGERA RST
100-300 5.6's average
200-300 10.28 average
AGERA RS 0-400-0 video
100-300 5.16 - 5.21 sec
200-300 8.42 seconds
AGERA RS SMOKE BLUE RST ANYWHERE.
If AGERA RS remove rear wing and mirrors and downforce remove and it will much much acceleration 300 to 460+ kmh.
Agera RS is much more downforce than Chiron anywhere. If remove it and will much quicker after 350 kmh definitely.

[@Smzxe]

@@RobertPope-RAZ The Agera RST 100-200 km/h was not full throttle
Only the 200-300 km/h is full throttle
Also Nevada Highway run was downhill run in tailwind thin Air higher altitude 4 massive advantaged that make it Faster
That sums up over 10-15 km/h Faster compared to run on a flat surface ( Koenigsegg One:1 same car)
On completely flat surface The Koenigsegg One:1 did 200-300 km/h in 5.3 seconds on VBOX
One:1 was quicker from 0-300 km/h than both Agera RS
One:1 and Agera RS are same cars
Hence there's minimal difference in acceleration from 100-300 km/h
But 300-400 kmph there will be massive difference due to downforce and aerodynamics

[@RobertPope-RAZ]

​@@Smzxe yes I agree with you right now. Definitely but you can't say AGERA RST is quicker because agera is AGERA and same motor.
So AGERA RS and RST have to be same acceleration. Then.
Same horsepower and same wing so nothing tell that RST is faster.
Yes I do like one:1 I believe one:1 little quicker than agera RS I bet.
But 300-400 I believe AGERA RS win.
I wish one:1 top speed video but no where it show post. Only AGERA RS one pure top speed.
If wing remove and agera RS will faster than 284 mph for sure even under 1350 hp which very surprise fast.

[@RobertPope-RAZ]

​@@Smzxe do you know that I used to live in Las Vegas and I did went that many times same road where AGERA RS went test. Highway 160. I rode my Suzuki Hayabusa went 228 mph with not heavy modifications on that road. In 2015. So I know that road very well 😊

[@RobertPope-RAZ]

100-200 RST is 5.63 aeconds on stopwatch i tried 6 times. Average 5.64 seconds.
But 100-300 10.28 seocnds
Now check agera on nevada 100-300 and 200-300 i will use stopwatch. Let see. Hold on.

[@Smzxe]

@@RobertPope-RAZ i timed 5.4 seconds frame by frame
And well in Agera RS fastest 0-400 km/h run on Nevada Highway it did 200-300 km/h in 5.2 seconds
So very close

[@RobertPope-RAZ]

@@Smzxe 🌟🌟💯👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼

[@RobertPope-RAZ]

I check Nevada agera rs.
Not true! I stop watch .any time.
100-300 is quicker than rst!!!
Did 8.42 seconds average.
Agera rst did 10.28 average.
Agera rs definitely quicker
Even i stopwatch 200-300 kmh is 5.16 and other 5.21 sepcnds
So red agera rs is DEFINITELY QUICKER
try stopwatch yourself to RST vs agera rs "0-400-0"
Let you stopwatch 5 times.
U need carefully eye at as soon as it touch 100 kmh then click immediately and as soon as it touch 300 then click stop immediately
5 time and u will see RS win smoke RST

[@Smzxe]

@@RobertPope-RAZ this RST 100-200 kmph was 70% throttle the 200-300 kph is on 100% throttle
well here is that video you're talking about Neveda Highway was downhill run on higher altitude thin Air and tailwind so 4 advantages over this Agera RST run
ruclips.net/video/b6Bkw0cM2pQ/видео.htmlsi=-wBLZfY0AaMvK0Dc