You can't compare the two for the reason, both rifles use 2 different ammo calibers. You can compare H&K 93 and Sig SG550 for both rifles use 5.56 ammo (Roller delay blowback vs long stoke piston ).
@@luakabsalam1816what's better then? The SG550 is very precise for a military service rifle. You can land perfect hits at a range of 500m. It was literally built to be as precise as it is.
@@chlu556 There is a lot of service riffle more accurate (not necessarily in the same caliber) but for a 5.56 riffle with no modification, its a pretty good riffle but there’s better option like the galil ace, cz bren, fn scar L not a big of difference to be honest but still better. btw i live in Switzerland so im familiar with the fass 90
@@davidmolovic5672 they might be good, but I doubt it that they are better. Accuracy is mostly determined by factors like barrel quality, rifling, trigger and ammo. The overall quality of the SG550 is superb compared to other service weapons used today. The swiss SG550 is optimized for the GP90 ammo, other 5.56 ammo types might not work as well. The trigger is pretty nice compared to a stock SCAR16S or stock M4 trigger (that might be personal preference or habit). As I said I've hit targets at a range of 500m without any difficulties during my military service. The only downsight imo is the length of the 550 in certain military situations like for example cqc (HOK), and yeah the caliber might be underpowered in some situations. Otherwise it's a really nice, very precise and reliable rifle imo (and I'm not the only one saying that).
@@chlu556 Maybe I have to test it with the gp90 which I’haven’t, his 20” barrel help a lot for the accuracy which for sur better than the 14” I got on my riffles. I have to admit that the Swiss quality fabrication is awesome (I was really impressed by the quality the first time I saw a fass 57 for the year it was produced). I have heard a lot of anecdotes of my friends who served proving the fass90 solidity and reliability too ahahah. I enjoy every time I shoot one and I understand why everyone love it! The problem is its too heavy, not ergonomics and needs to be modernised a little to be on the same scale as the one a mentioned. I have tried shooting at 450m with the cz and the galil it was pretty accurate too. I’m pretty sur i can have same results of accuracy as you if I put a 20“ barrel on my riffles.
Which one can still shoot well without being cleaned after multiple shooting and reload + being abused with mud, sand and sea water; both at the same? Bonus mark if it any one of these can being cleaned without consuming lots of times.
You can't compare the two for the reason, both rifles use 2 different ammo calibers.
You can compare H&K 93 and Sig SG550 for both rifles use 5.56 ammo (Roller delay blowback vs long stoke piston ).
Damals immer mit G3 in den Schlafsack gekuschelt 😂
We viewers demand to hear the sound of the shots!😂
Haha, Appreciate it we will definitely take that into consideration if we do another weapon series.
Sig 550🇨🇭🇨🇭🇨🇭
Sig 550 i use it for service no guns is accurate as this shit
Load of bull
@@luakabsalam1816what's better then? The SG550 is very precise for a military service rifle. You can land perfect hits at a range of 500m. It was literally built to be as precise as it is.
@@chlu556 There is a lot of service riffle more accurate (not necessarily in the same caliber) but for a 5.56 riffle with no modification, its a pretty good riffle but there’s better option like the galil ace, cz bren, fn scar L not a big of difference to be honest but still better. btw i live in Switzerland so im familiar with the fass 90
@@davidmolovic5672 they might be good, but I doubt it that they are better. Accuracy is mostly determined by factors like barrel quality, rifling, trigger and ammo. The overall quality of the SG550 is superb compared to other service weapons used today. The swiss SG550 is optimized for the GP90 ammo, other 5.56 ammo types might not work as well. The trigger is pretty nice compared to a stock SCAR16S or stock M4 trigger (that might be personal preference or habit). As I said I've hit targets at a range of 500m without any difficulties during my military service. The only downsight imo is the length of the 550 in certain military situations like for example cqc (HOK), and yeah the caliber might be underpowered in some situations. Otherwise it's a really nice, very precise and reliable rifle imo (and I'm not the only one saying that).
@@chlu556 Maybe I have to test it with the gp90 which I’haven’t, his 20” barrel help a lot for the accuracy which for sur better than the 14” I got on my riffles. I have to admit that the Swiss quality fabrication is awesome (I was really impressed by the quality the first time I saw a fass 57 for the year it was produced). I have heard a lot of anecdotes of my friends who served proving the fass90 solidity and reliability too ahahah. I enjoy every time I shoot one and I understand why everyone love it! The problem is its too heavy, not ergonomics and needs to be modernised a little to be on the same scale as the one a mentioned.
I have tried shooting at 450m with the cz and the galil it was pretty accurate too. I’m pretty sur i can have same results of accuracy as you if I put a 20“ barrel on my riffles.
Which one can still shoot well without being cleaned after multiple shooting and reload + being abused with mud, sand and sea water; both at the same?
Bonus mark if it any one of these can being cleaned without consuming lots of times.
Both AR will be playable on Arena Breakout
IYESSSS MI BRO
Swiss SIG550 is winner, but i like West Germany HK G3 and America M16A1
FN FAL Wins
There's no fn fal only between the hk g3 and the sig sg 550
@@danilocabaiii6868 i know, its not serious
Sig sauer ssg 550
Sturmgwehr 90
STURMGEWEHR 90 🇨🇭🇨🇭🇨🇭🇨🇭🇨🇭🇨🇭🇨🇭🇨🇭