GPX5000 VS GPX6000 VS GPZ7000

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 13 янв 2025

Комментарии • 47

  • @jeffries1232
    @jeffries1232 Год назад +2

    This is exactly how i think a good test should be done .Thank you.
    It really shows you how to see real differences when the coil sizes are close enough to each target and different detector.Other videos dont show good technique like you guys have as well as the variable equipment and targets sizes ..High applause for your video

  • @laurieboyle3338
    @laurieboyle3338 2 года назад +1

    Thank you Benny for such a thorough test. Nice to see my 5000 still has a job to do. would be nice to see what the gpx 19 inch coil could do.

  • @beergold
    @beergold Год назад +3

    5000 Special?, but what timing, if it was in Sharp together with Deep, you would have the deepest practical setting you could use, get an SD 2200d on those big targets, it will most likely beat the 7, i tested the stock dd coil on just the top part of a coke can buried in the side of an old timers hole in Victoria and got it easily at 4ft, i have a 5 and an SD2200d.
    These tests should be done with the deepest possible settings on each machine, this will tell you which is deepest, but what we did learn from this is that the 6 is a flyshitter mostly.

  • @jamessherry1661
    @jamessherry1661 Год назад +1

    Great video Benny and excellent display of skills. Love all your other vids too. A master craftsmen at it.

  • @ataasantoso8788
    @ataasantoso8788 Год назад +1

    Hi Benny
    Great from Indonesia
    Thanks for your videos

  • @topendgold9284
    @topendgold9284 2 года назад +1

    Excellent, thankyou. I have the zed and the 6k. The zed is my go to. Also have the 3 coils you tested on the zed. The 12" is my favorite.

  • @GoldProspectorss
    @GoldProspectorss 2 года назад +1

    Thank you very much for this professional detector comparison, it is the most honest most realistic metal detector comparison on youtube 🙏🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷

  • @diggingwithphasetech
    @diggingwithphasetech Год назад +2

    Good stuff, nice to know that the results in WA dirt mirror my testing. 17x13" Zsearch in General is just awesome on the good targets, and still very sensitive to the smalls. And the 5000 is hanging right in with the Zed except on the two smallest targets. Love that 17x13 Evo.

    • @jeffries1232
      @jeffries1232 Год назад

      and what great recognition from a gold jedi as yourself .Do you guess enhance may have gotten the beer can though ? of the top of your experience ?

    • @diggingwithphasetech
      @diggingwithphasetech Год назад +1

      @@jeffries1232 You mean with the 12" Evo? Possibly, but Enhance doesn't always provide more depth on large targets. I have experienced many instances where Fine Gold can go deeper. Too many variables at play. Also depends on the coils, some will play better with certain timings - also the coil switch position can make a difference. Normal timing with a very low Gain I'd be more confident in.

    • @jeffries1232
      @jeffries1232 Год назад

      ​@@diggingwithphasetech I'll keep that in mind .Normal timing with low gain. In fact today i am heading out and ill try that in my new spot
      i forgot to mention i was talking about the 17 inch elliptical in enhance on the 5000 in my previous query cheers

    • @diggingwithphasetech
      @diggingwithphasetech Год назад +2

      ​@@jeffries1232 okay. Judging by the signal he got in Fine Gold I reckon Enhance would have got it easily.

    • @jeffries1232
      @jeffries1232 Год назад

      @@diggingwithphasetech good to know cheers for that ..I am just playing with some of my setting lately so all extra opinions help thanks again

  • @lachlanscanlan5621
    @lachlanscanlan5621 3 месяца назад

    a very good video on depth test well done

  • @bushbasher6448
    @bushbasher6448 Год назад

    Hi Benny thanks for the great comparison and it has confirmed why i felt I was walking over deep targets with my 6k.

  • @Jennifer-007
    @Jennifer-007 Год назад +2

    On the 5k, special is not a timing, it’s a selection on the end cap, which of the special did you choose in the menu system? Telling us special tells us nothing, other than this huge brain fart, this was a great video. Oh, and learn to balance your audio, we had to crank it up to hear your mumbling then the music would kick in an blast us out of the bloody room.

  • @UndergroundMetalDetecting
    @UndergroundMetalDetecting Год назад

    Detector Jackpot! 💥⛏️💍💰 Keep it up! 💪
    (fellow detectorists in Buffalo NY 🇺🇸)

  • @freedomandjustice8778
    @freedomandjustice8778 Год назад +1

    Which of the three detectors is best for gold nuggets

  • @stevefox6864
    @stevefox6864 Год назад

    Excellent test probably one of the best I have seen

  • @robmadaffari6270
    @robmadaffari6270 2 года назад +1

    That's why the 7 is a beast, the new 17 coil has many use's as does the std Z coil. Add a SP01 booster and good headphones (which I have) and ya have a deadly combination. Good test thanks will now consider the new NF17

    • @dddsss3439
      @dddsss3439 7 месяцев назад

      Что это SPO1?

  • @shawnscells-sy7qc
    @shawnscells-sy7qc Год назад +1

    GPX 5000 Special Timings in factory preset mode is in FINE GOLD.

  • @karimrazak3798
    @karimrazak3798 Год назад

    What is a good dish for the GPX 5000 device to search for burials?💰

  • @rt-ks2bh
    @rt-ks2bh Год назад +1

    The z is top dog thats for sure,,,well done benny,,,,,,thx for sharing my friend

  •  2 года назад +2

    Gpx5000 special timing ??

  • @GM-ff6kg
    @GM-ff6kg 2 года назад +2

    Would be nice to see what the Garrett Axiom can do!

    • @GM-ff6kg
      @GM-ff6kg 2 года назад

      @@michaelarmannsson5559 ?

    • @shanelevens2072
      @shanelevens2072 2 года назад +1

      I dare say it will be equal to the 5000, although it will depend to a degree on what sort of coils will be available with it.

  • @wdgreg589
    @wdgreg589 2 года назад +3

    Hi Benny, looks like the 7000 is still king. The 5000 not too bad,and the 6000 you are walking over big gold at depth. Cheers Greg

  • @shanelevens2072
    @shanelevens2072 2 года назад

    Subscribed (really good comparison)

  • @tetecacabral6964
    @tetecacabral6964 Год назад

    Boa tarde, qual é a marca da bobina ideal pro gpx5000? Quero comparar um, mas não sei que marca de bobina compro.

  • @mrchuckington6260
    @mrchuckington6260 11 месяцев назад +1

    Would everyone agree that the 6000 was the best on fine gold?

  • @keshermedia
    @keshermedia 7 месяцев назад

    Well, I'm late to the show and must say that I'm still impressed with my 5000, and it's paid for, so that's a little bonus as well.
    It's definitely more cumbersome than the sleek new all-in-one models, and it is frustrating a hell to keep digging and getting up, and digging and getting up with all that crap i'm wearing... augh! 😵‍💫😳😬🤬
    BUT IT'S PAID FOR ITS SELF A DOZEN TIMES, and it appears of dammed near as good as the 7000.
    🤔 From the comments I would bet if I knew joe to use it better, and actually used it more, I could probably give that fancy 7000 a good run for its money! 💁👍
    Thank you for another excellent video.

  • @DTGTDetectingTheGoldenTriangle

    Thanks for the video awesome to see 👌 I have been meaning to do some tests but get to a gold field and bam I'm after big gold again 😂

  • @beverlytim
    @beverlytim 2 года назад +2

    Wow . The 7000 is a beast in general difficult

  • @yongliangzhaao5055
    @yongliangzhaao5055 2 года назад +1

    耶! 这个对比测试太专业了吧,也很全面! 老大就是不一样!!
    👍👍

  • @stevefox6864
    @stevefox6864 Год назад +2

    I cannot believe how useless the 6000 is good old 5000 holding its head high 😊

  • @Aaron-uf8wg
    @Aaron-uf8wg Год назад

    I noticed you only tested the 6000 in difficult which detects a lot shallower,

    • @bennyprospector2620
      @bennyprospector2620  Год назад

      yes .All three machines were tested on difficult mode.Normal mode is not available in most high mineralized area

  • @sanserosansero6556
    @sanserosansero6556 11 месяцев назад

    Good

  • @melbournesubtropicfruits9474
    @melbournesubtropicfruits9474 2 года назад

    Great tests - love to have heard 7000 in Normal - would have screamed👍

    • @bennyprospector2620
      @bennyprospector2620  2 года назад

      Normal models will be difficult to swing in highly mineralized areas.

    • @melbournesubtropicfruits9474
      @melbournesubtropicfruits9474 2 года назад

      @@bennyprospector2620 Yes i definitely realise that Normal is highly reactive to high iron soil - ive dug a couple quite deep false targets learning this but if you are over a know bit of metal it will be louder than ground noise. Bit different if you had to dig as i go to difficult now to check after digging down a bit - if there's a target should improve. If not fill it back up.

  • @stevefox6864
    @stevefox6864 Год назад

    7000 still the best