True, but even a 5D Mark ii was used for select shots of Avengers, and the whole Act of Valor film for ease of placement and cheap to replace in a high action set, so I would say that it is a useful feature for a wider spectrum of use!
To be exact, Avatar was shot on a special 3D rig that used the Sony F950 and most of what you saw wasn't recorded video but computer animation. As for Hugo, I'm sure they shot the movie at the Alexa's highest resolution which is 2.5K.
@@Alexmfabry still thinking lol. Really waiting to see what the a7siii has to offer. Just need 10 but 4:2:2 and I'm sold (unlikely it will have it though) .
@@Alexmfabry my 2 biggest issues with the camera is the form factor and having to buy an external recorder when I could get a BMPCC4K for $200 more and it's I intrnal raw. I have Sony lenses so that's kinda out for me.
Not Philip, but the camera seems pretty amazing. You can build a lens collection in time, but you'd at least be able to get a start. The kit lens for some amazing options they have in this camera for focus, with some decent canon primes sounds like a really great start.
Any A-Mount Zeiss Lenses. You need an adapter from E mount to A-Mount. Same adapter that comes with the VG-900. Zeiss 24-70 A-Mount. Also, the Sigma 35mm that comes out in a month is supposed to unbelievable.
Isn't it amazing that only a couple of years ago. all that was needed for broadcast was a 3CCD SD camera, like the famous Dx100 from Panasonic, but nowadays and DSLR which has over twice the resolution is not good enough for them..
probably wait until the final product. So far this looks great though. Ask yourself would you use the super slo mo on it? I'm not Philip and I know you asked him but I just thought I'd try and help. This is def a great camera to be had under 10k. It's all in what you're using it for.
I read that they were shot with the Alexa, plus its on their site. And as for the 4k display i have not seen an actual display, just projection. But im talking about in theaters. And after watching Hugo then something like The Hobbit which was shot in 5k, i mean, they both look great! Although i cant really notice a difference in terms of quality on the big screen.
Dear Philip, I have about $10K USA budget for a new camera. On that budget I can only see getting the kit lens and a canon lens adaptor for 2 mid grade primes own. Is this a good or bad choice? Thanks
Philip Bloom which lenses did you use at the scene with the man (your father?) who is smoking and at 10:46? It just looks amazing! I hope it was a Canon lens so I can get it for my 600D/T3i some day. :D
The Odyssey 7Q recorder is going to you record 2K RAW 12-bit up to 240fps, Compressed 1080p 10-bit YCC up to 60fps (super-sampled from 4K Raw), Compressed 4K YCC 10-bit up to 30fps. $2,295 + a SSD will unlock all of the fs700's potential come mid august.
i wish sony would make a new version of the sony nex vg20 that has less issues. Because this camera seems much more affordable for normal people, when u want a camcorder with changable optics
Nice review, didn't know about the aliasing and moire problem when you go to Super Slow Motion with FS700. I also saw that you used an adapter to the EF mount, have you encountered any kind of issues with that? focus wise or image sharpness loss?
Even seeing stuff in the cinema is so subjective. Bulbs turned down etc... Lets also not forget what makes a film look great is not the camera for the most part in my experience. I have seen some pretty poor stuff on epic and some stunning stuff on dslrs
4k is good when you are filming some solids or special effects so you can still crop the image and mantain that hd look soo yhe its not a need for everyone but yes for a small amount of filmakers is some situations.
Hey Phill, great review... i'm from Brazil and i really need a camera like that.. but isnt the fs100 enough?? 240 frames and the nd filter looks really nice, but what else worth the expensive price ??
Hi Philip! Would you recommend this camera for a first real film camera coming from a DSLR? I have a chance to get it for 1000 pounds with a speedbooster so I can use my canon lenses. And a black magic monitor.
I'm usually a canon guy and therefore I only own canon lenses, though I am in the process of looking for a camera that can shoot 240fps full HD, and as far as my research has gone the FS700 is the best option. Do you still think this is correct? And does it work just fine with a converter to canon lenses? (If I recall you said in this video that it worked fine, but I might be wrong) Thanks in advance
Jarris Photo I think that it is quite a literal statement. With an external recorder and raw upgrade you can record 4K externally. Otherwise it’s HD internal.
Does this camera still hold up? I'm considering either this or the A7S for my film studio. I have professional equipment like arri lights and rokinon lenses. The camera we have been using works but I feel there's a need for an upgrade
Hello sir, I need some advice here. Normally I shoot with 5D mark 2 and 3. I've had the chance to work with current DP friend on sony FS7, Canon c100 mark1, mark2 and c300. Right now i got a job offer to work with a club that is establishing its own in house production house to cover different Martial arts events, shoot indoor podcasts, and video tutorials. The current equipment is a sony A3500, canon x10, and an FS700 with 24mm and 50mm lenses. Of course i am convincing them to upgrade to more lenses. I had the time to mess around with it, after watching your videos, I am going to mess around even more only the right way. If i have the chance to change this camera since the FS5 replaced it, would it be wise to try to sell it and get a canon C100 instead? I live in lebanon, the FS700 was shipped all the way from USA to here. But Im fearing this isnt the right camera for tutorial videos. Dont know if i can shoot podcasts with it or have to get 2 sony pxw 160's and connect them to the computer to cut live to youtube or so. I need some advice, If i have to change the camera, what would be best option? however here a friend who happens to be an idependent film maker insists that screw the FS700, and get a 5D mark III, We dont need the FS700, and since im used to the 5D, its better and more flexible to shoot with using EF lenses and other lenses with adapter. Philip Bloom what do you think? thankyou
I am in the same boat, its so close but just a little to costly for us to justify at 8 thousand... at 5 it would be a done deal (maybe $8000 if it did 4k)
Hello How are u , I hope you are fine Please, I am a novice in the field of photography and I bought a Sony fs700 forrecording slow and I have some questions: 1.How can I adjust the purity of the screen when I work because when i switch to super slow motion becomes dark and grainy screen, what is the appropriate procedure for that? 2.What is the difference between shutter speed and fps and how setting it in slow motion? 3.important: Can I extract 960 frames per second on my laptop when recording in super slow motion? I want to get 960 single image per second and transform it into a laptop device, how I can do that? I hope help me give me any information about it as soon as possible, and you all thanks and appreciation Dear
Sony E mount native and Sony/Minolta, Nikon, Canon, Pentax,Canon, Mamiya, Zeiss, Leica....... pretty much anything with an adapter. the shorter answer would be what can't you use.
+Luc Beloix no they are not! you need to do some research on what "broadcast approved" means. You can put anything you want on TV but to be approved for full HD acquisition means being a certain quality level.
Philip Bloom Apologize for my confusion, but on Aljazeera I have seen many time Skype phonecalls being broadcasted as well as Cellphone footage along with CCTV during the news. Now, After doing some researches I found out what the BBC needs for standars for broadcasting: HD, 1080i25, 16:9, minimum of 100Mbit Intra/50Mbit Inter, 4:2:2 in an MXF container with an XML metadata file. Also, the EBU TIERING OF HIGH DEFINITION CAMERAS of 2015 (couldn't find the 2016 one), include the h.264 codec in their tiers. So I am REALLY, REALLY, confused. It seems to me that "Broadcast Quality" it is quite arbitrary depending on what the network wants. What about programs like: "America's Funniest Home videos" Most of thevideo broadcasted by that program where shot with low quality cameras yet, they get broadcasted.. Also, when the final cut of the program is done, you can just simply export it to the specs that the network wants, they will never know the difference! (According that you shot with a decent camera in a decent way ) Otherwise, I am really, really confused! :)
+Luc Beloit its what i said in my reply. anything can be broadcast but or a show to be shot in HD then it needs to be of a certain quality/ criteria. Your examples are not appropriate. You are not talking about shows shot for TV you are talking 3rd party footage used for various reasons. Whole different thing. It doesnt matter if they "won't know the difference" if you are making a show for a broadcaster you shoot at the minimum level or higher that they ask for. Using less and pretending is not professional and won't see you being used again!
Philip Bloom Oh, everything it's much clearer now! Thanks mr. Bloom! :) p.s. I honestly can't believe that the footage the FS700 produces is not "broadcast worthy" It's stunning! :D Oh well, I guess the 4K RAW files that camera generates must be (just joking)
+Luc Beloix it's simple. The bitrate internally is very low. Not robust enough to go through all the post production pipeline. It's way less than bluray too
Well If it`s the way you make money for life then yes you spend your money on this + 4K is really handy when stabilizing shots,croping, CC and still not losing quality when you export to 1 or 2 K
@@philipbloom I just want to shoot 1080 RUclips videos with a Glide Gear teleprompter over the lens and edit them in Resolve. This is the one I saw on ebay for $550: www.ebay.com/itm/Sony-NEX-FS700R-Camcorder/223929623888?epid=219487335&hash=item34233ee550:g:qjUAAOSw-F1eV~ck Would something like the latest GoPro Hero Black be better or more versatile (I could put it on a quadcopter)? Or some other oldie but goodie but now cheap as dirt camera? No matter how much I try I'm great at video and photo editing, but just can't seem to break into recording original footage :-/ My brain just does not think shooting video, it thinks shooting stills. Maybe something that takes a lot less fiddle farting with to set up close to right before you proess the record button...
You sound like people back in 1999 who were like, "Who needs 1080p, you have to go out and buy a 10k USD 1080p screen" to view it. 4K screens are coming out now, and future proofing your work makes more sense then thinking what is only necessary in the present
When Sony comes out with a successor that matches this at less than $5K, or the camera drops in price, I'm taking my chances and will be buying one - regardless of what the mrs thinks....
That feature would be for indy or budget filmmakers who want to make feature films for cinema.. not youtube videos.. thats why its called future proof, it think its brilliant.. it means you will only have to upgrade the firmware and not a whole damn camera.. Nikon could have learned a lesson here and made their D800 future proof, the processing power will easily handle 60 fps @ Full HD but no, they only give you 30fps in Full HD, they will no doubt bring out a whole new camera, wankers..
LOL "WAY TOO POOR" LOL. THOSE WORDS CRACKED ME UP LAUGHING. ONE IS ONLY POOR IF THEY THINK NEGATIVE, SMALL OR LACK CONFIDENCE IN THEMSELVES. WE CAN ALL HAVE A FS700. YOU JUST HAVE TO WORK YOUR WAY UP SLOWLY. AND I MEAN WORK YOUR WAY UP IN YOUR SKILLS, CRAFT AS WELL AS THE FUNDS. THE FUNDS WILL COME WHEN YOU ARE SKILLED AND CAN SELL YOURSELF
![BLACK BAG - Official Trailer [HD] - Only in Theaters March 14](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Du0Xp8WX_7I/mqdefault.jpg)
The crop factor is awesome, and hey the camera is an AMAZING 1080p camera!!!
So 4K is just a freaking AMAZING bonus ! Jeez.
True, but even a 5D Mark ii was used for select shots of Avengers, and the whole Act of Valor film for ease of placement and cheap to replace in a high action set, so I would say that it is a useful feature for a wider spectrum of use!
To be exact, Avatar was shot on a special 3D rig that used the Sony F950 and most of what you saw wasn't recorded video but computer animation. As for Hugo, I'm sure they shot the movie at the Alexa's highest resolution which is 2.5K.
Thinking about getting the fs700r in 2019 for personal projects. With the 4k and overall image quality, you can get one for under 2k on eBay.
I'm thinking the same thing. You make any decisions about this yet?
@@Alexmfabry still thinking lol. Really waiting to see what the a7siii has to offer. Just need 10 but 4:2:2 and I'm sold (unlikely it will have it though) .
@@Skully It's so tough to decide. I've been waffling for months about what to buy.
@@Alexmfabry my 2 biggest issues with the camera is the form factor and having to buy an external recorder when I could get a BMPCC4K for $200 more and it's I intrnal raw. I have Sony lenses so that's kinda out for me.
Not Philip, but the camera seems pretty amazing. You can build a lens collection in time, but you'd at least be able to get a start. The kit lens for some amazing options they have in this camera for focus, with some decent canon primes sounds like a really great start.
Philip, your videos are so awesome. It's like being in a hands on classroom and that's amazing. Thank you sir.
its not a matter of that there are numerous other selling points. but as for the 4k it is always good more pixels to play with for zoom/cropping etc
Any A-Mount Zeiss Lenses. You need an adapter from E mount to A-Mount. Same adapter that comes with the VG-900. Zeiss 24-70 A-Mount. Also, the Sigma 35mm that comes out in a month is supposed to unbelievable.
Isn't it amazing that only a couple of years ago. all that was needed for broadcast was a 3CCD SD camera, like the famous Dx100 from Panasonic, but nowadays and DSLR which has over twice the resolution is not good enough for them..
+Philip Bloom Can we do a good indie movie with this camera?
Can you import footage into Fcpx ok?
probably wait until the final product. So far this looks great though. Ask yourself would you use the super slo mo on it? I'm not Philip and I know you asked him but I just thought I'd try and help. This is def a great camera to be had under 10k. It's all in what you're using it for.
I read that they were shot with the Alexa, plus its on their site. And as for the 4k display i have not seen an actual display, just projection. But im talking about in theaters. And after watching Hugo then something like The Hobbit which was shot in 5k, i mean, they both look great! Although i cant really notice a difference in terms of quality on the big screen.
Dear Philip,
I have about $10K USA budget for a new camera. On that budget I can only see getting the kit lens and a canon lens adaptor for 2 mid grade primes own. Is this a good or bad choice? Thanks
I used the Fs700 one weekend and I think it does have settings to change the thickness of the peaking.. doesn't it? I remember tweaking it I think.
Philip Bloom which lenses did you use at the scene with the man (your father?) who is smoking and at 10:46? It just looks amazing! I hope it was a Canon lens so I can get it for my 600D/T3i some day. :D
The Odyssey 7Q recorder is going to you record 2K RAW 12-bit up to 240fps, Compressed 1080p 10-bit YCC up to 60fps (super-sampled from 4K Raw),
Compressed 4K YCC 10-bit up to 30fps. $2,295 + a SSD will unlock all of the fs700's potential come mid august.
The detail is crazy!
Very much appreciate your review, did you you make a further one with 4K RAW / SLOG2 upgrade? With thanks for all your hard work.
did they give the fs700 two sd card slots?!?
dont get me wrong but how do you know that? have you seen films shot in 4k on a 4k display?
How is color correction on this vs CCing on DSLR video
what is the first music you use ? i like it !
i wish sony would make a new version of the sony nex vg20 that has less issues. Because this camera seems much more affordable for normal people, when u want a camcorder with changable optics
Hi Phillip How would you compare this camera to canon C100 Marik ii?
FS700 has 4K raw and slow motion, the C100mk2 doesn't. But Canon has their DPAF
Nice review, didn't know about the aliasing and moire problem when you go to Super Slow Motion with FS700. I also saw that you used an adapter to the EF mount, have you encountered any kind of issues with that? focus wise or image sharpness loss?
PB - and now? 2016? Does it hold up for what it does well?
cheers!
yes but even at low it's too overpowering
Whats the general opinion on the kit lens, how well does it work? Macro? zoom? ect
Thanks
Even seeing stuff in the cinema is so subjective. Bulbs turned down etc...
Lets also not forget what makes a film look great is not the camera for the most part in my experience. I have seen some pretty poor stuff on epic and some stunning stuff on dslrs
so if I just wanna make films, I'll just go for the FS100 ?
4k is good when you are filming some solids or special effects so you can still crop the image and mantain that hd look soo yhe its not a need for everyone but yes for a small amount of filmakers is some situations.
Hey Phill, great review... i'm from Brazil and i really need a camera like that.. but isnt the fs100 enough?? 240 frames and the nd filter looks really nice, but what else worth the expensive price ??
Hi Philip! Would you recommend this camera for a first real film camera coming from a DSLR? I have a chance to get it for 1000 pounds with a speedbooster so I can use my canon lenses. And a black magic monitor.
Great review! i always looks forward to watching ur stuff!
Well, it's useful in editing. Just like high codecs
I cant afford it either but the insight will help me in future if I am operating for someone's else's project.
I found one for 1900 used. is it worth it?
interesting ... and well done as usual
with what kind of license you by music for youtube videos?
I'm usually a canon guy and therefore I only own canon lenses, though I am in the process of looking for a camera that can shoot 240fps full HD, and as far as my research has gone the FS700 is the best option.
Do you still think this is correct? And does it work just fine with a converter to canon lenses? (If I recall you said in this video that it worked fine, but I might be wrong)
Thanks in advance
its out of date. replace by the Sony FS5
I'll look into it, thanks for the quick answer!
The slow motion is so addicting
Please show more respect to others when commenting. Act like an adult please Thanks
What do you mean by 4k is only external recording? I don't understand?
Jarris Photo I think that it is quite a literal statement. With an external recorder and raw upgrade you can record 4K externally. Otherwise it’s HD internal.
Bit ridiculous, advertising the camera as "4k 60fps" when you need to spend another couple hundred quid to actually achieve this
Jarris Photo they do? Are you 100% sure? 4K capable I believe is what’s said
Jarris Photo it’s also 6 years old!!!!
well, if i was making a feature length film. id want it in 4k, you can really tell the differance
Does this camera still hold up? I'm considering either this or the A7S for my film studio. I have professional equipment like arri lights and rokinon lenses. The camera we have been using works but I feel there's a need for an upgrade
Yes, the fs700 plus the odessy 7q makes one monster of a camera which in my opinion crushes most of the new cameras.
crushes? Makes it still a viable camera but not crushes...
compared to the a7s and this camera or even fs100 what would you recommend?
cheers!
buy it, youll be fine lol
Go with the a7s unless you need the camcorder controls.
Hello sir, I need some advice here. Normally I shoot with 5D mark 2 and 3. I've had the chance to work with current DP friend on sony FS7, Canon c100 mark1, mark2 and c300. Right now i got a job offer to work with a club that is establishing its own in house production house to cover different Martial arts events, shoot indoor podcasts, and video tutorials. The current equipment is a sony A3500, canon x10, and an FS700 with 24mm and 50mm lenses. Of course i am convincing them to upgrade to more lenses. I had the time to mess around with it, after watching your videos, I am going to mess around even more only the right way. If i have the chance to change this camera since the FS5 replaced it, would it be wise to try to sell it and get a canon C100 instead? I live in lebanon, the FS700 was shipped all the way from USA to here. But Im fearing this isnt the right camera for tutorial videos. Dont know if i can shoot podcasts with it or have to get 2 sony pxw 160's and connect them to the computer to cut live to youtube or so. I need some advice, If i have to change the camera, what would be best option? however here a friend who happens to be an idependent film maker insists that screw the FS700, and get a 5D mark III, We dont need the FS700, and since im used to the 5D, its better and more flexible to shoot with using EF lenses and other lenses with adapter. Philip Bloom what do you think? thankyou
I really like this camera and want to say thank you for a very in-depth review of this camera. :)
I don't understand what he means by Db instead of ISO. Could anyone explain it to me please?
dB is the measurement unit for gain, it's essentially the same thing as iso
I am in the same boat, its so close but just a little to costly for us to justify at 8 thousand... at 5 it would be a done deal (maybe $8000 if it did 4k)
Hi
is this camera comparable with Final Cut Pro??
final cut is just an editing program it can import a lot of different formats and yes it will recognize the files
Hello How are u , I hope you are fine
Please, I am a novice in the field of photography and I bought a Sony fs700 forrecording slow and I have some questions:
1.How can I adjust the purity of the screen when I work because when i switch to super slow motion becomes dark and grainy screen, what is the appropriate procedure for that?
2.What is the difference between shutter speed and fps and how setting it in slow motion?
3.important: Can I extract 960 frames per second on my laptop when recording in super slow motion? I want to get 960 single image per second and transform it into a laptop device, how I can do that? I hope help me give me any information about it as soon as possible, and you all thanks and appreciation Dear
I wish I had this camera.
great video. Thanks
Can you do a review on VG900 too, please? Thank you :)
friend a question, what lens are used in the Sony FS700?
I think nex e mount lenses but the shallow flange distance of the e mount means a lot of adapters for other lens brands are available for it
Sony E mount native and Sony/Minolta, Nikon, Canon, Pentax,Canon, Mamiya, Zeiss, Leica....... pretty much anything with an adapter. the shorter answer would be what can't you use.
I love your videos! Evens if I can't afford such a camera in the moment...
Will you do the review of VG-900 too! Love your reviews ;)
Please write the lenses!!!!
Савелий Шарков ask me 6 years ago!!
Avatar and Hugo were shot in 1080p. And they look better than most films shot in 4k.
Broadcast approved? So, if this is not broadcast approved, how come skype and CCTV footage are?
+Luc Beloix no they are not! you need to do some research on what "broadcast approved" means. You can put anything you want on TV but to be approved for full HD acquisition means being a certain quality level.
Philip Bloom
Apologize for my confusion, but on Aljazeera I have seen many time Skype phonecalls being broadcasted as well as Cellphone footage along with CCTV during the news. Now, After doing some researches I found out what the BBC needs for standars for broadcasting: HD, 1080i25, 16:9, minimum of 100Mbit Intra/50Mbit Inter, 4:2:2 in an MXF container with an XML metadata file. Also, the EBU TIERING OF HIGH DEFINITION
CAMERAS of 2015 (couldn't find the 2016 one), include the h.264 codec in their tiers. So I am REALLY, REALLY, confused. It seems to me that "Broadcast Quality" it is quite arbitrary depending on what the network wants.
What about programs like: "America's Funniest Home videos" Most of thevideo broadcasted by that program where shot with low quality cameras yet, they get broadcasted..
Also, when the final cut of the program is done, you can just simply export it to the specs that the network wants, they will never know the difference! (According that you shot with a decent camera in a decent way ) Otherwise, I am really, really confused! :)
+Luc Beloit its what i said in my reply. anything can be broadcast but or a show to be shot in HD then it needs to be of a certain quality/ criteria. Your examples are not appropriate. You are not talking about shows shot for TV you are talking 3rd party footage used for various reasons. Whole different thing.
It doesnt matter if they "won't know the difference" if you are making a show for a broadcaster you shoot at the minimum level or higher that they ask for. Using less and pretending is not professional and won't see you being used again!
Philip Bloom
Oh, everything it's much clearer now!
Thanks mr. Bloom! :)
p.s.
I honestly can't believe that the footage the FS700 produces is not "broadcast worthy" It's stunning! :D Oh well, I guess the 4K RAW files that camera generates must be (just joking)
+Luc Beloix it's simple. The bitrate internally is very low. Not robust enough to go through all the post production pipeline. It's way less than bluray too
Many thank , do you know any camcorder can do over 1200 fps ?
Well If it`s the way you make money for life then yes you spend your money on this + 4K is really handy when stabilizing shots,croping, CC and still not losing quality when you export to 1 or 2 K
But would you buy it in 2020?
CHOPPERGIRL's AIRWAR well no because it’s an outdated old camera....if you can get one cheap and with the raw firmware then maybe
@@philipbloom I just want to shoot 1080 RUclips videos with a Glide Gear teleprompter over the lens and edit them in Resolve. This is the one I saw on ebay for $550: www.ebay.com/itm/Sony-NEX-FS700R-Camcorder/223929623888?epid=219487335&hash=item34233ee550:g:qjUAAOSw-F1eV~ck
Would something like the latest GoPro Hero Black be better or more versatile (I could put it on a quadcopter)? Or some other oldie but goodie but now cheap as dirt camera?
No matter how much I try I'm great at video and photo editing, but just can't seem to break into recording original footage :-/ My brain just does not think shooting video, it thinks shooting stills. Maybe something that takes a lot less fiddle farting with to set up close to right before you proess the record button...
CHOPPERGIRL's AIRWAR sounds. Cheap
Sony NEX Fs700 - PolarisX2 In SuperSlowMotion
=> _Get it here!...._goo.gl/SWAQew
excellent review
forgive my ignorance but what is peeking ?
You sound like people back in 1999 who were like, "Who needs 1080p, you have to go out and buy a 10k USD 1080p screen" to view it. 4K screens are coming out now, and future proofing your work makes more sense then thinking what is only necessary in the present
shame it doesn't have 4:2:2 colour space
I like your review
When Sony comes out with a successor that matches this at less than $5K, or the camera drops in price, I'm taking my chances and will be buying one - regardless of what the mrs thinks....
Because they were placed through DMR.
I don't understand...this can only shoot 4K under what circumstances?
Externally, meaning the use of something like the Odyssey 7Q.
Love your stuff! FYI you can adjust peaking sensitivity in 3 increments.
I wish I had the cash for this. Although my 7D has been treating me quite well.
agreed
i wouldnt want film, way too costly. and not to sound boring but you can replicate film pretty much exactly on magic bullet and other similar programs
as far as I know, a £2,000 edit suite running Adobe Premiere will pretty happily chomp through 4k in realtime.
Mythbusters on 00:44?
But it allows "real" professionals to display on larger and larger projectors. 4K would look good even in an IMAX!
That's what people said to HD...
it's been 5 years and i still haven't own a descent camera. tsk2 i hate being poor.
Cool
This is 2012! Much has happened since then.....
great cam still
I think that he meant that they look better in cinemas.
I am glad I found you here. I don't like vimeo!
4:29 genius
Really want this camera :O stuck with my 550d at the moment :/ , guys someone check out my work and tell me how I'm doing!
Chinese already have 50" 4k TV for 1500$.
If people had this type of attitude ten years ago, we would still be using 480P.
That feature would be for indy or budget filmmakers who want to make feature films for cinema.. not youtube videos.. thats why its called future proof, it think its brilliant.. it means you will only have to upgrade the firmware and not a whole damn camera.. Nikon could have learned a lesson here and made their D800 future proof, the processing power will easily handle 60 fps @ Full HD but no, they only give you 30fps in Full HD, they will no doubt bring out a whole new camera, wankers..
But... Its slow mo!
sooner or later.. that's it
Cheers to that :))
I think the slow motion is lame excuse to make more money
i can't afford this. i'm way to poor.
LOL "WAY TOO POOR" LOL. THOSE WORDS CRACKED ME UP LAUGHING. ONE IS ONLY POOR IF THEY THINK NEGATIVE, SMALL OR LACK CONFIDENCE IN THEMSELVES. WE CAN ALL HAVE A FS700. YOU JUST HAVE TO WORK YOUR WAY UP SLOWLY. AND I MEAN WORK YOUR WAY UP IN YOUR SKILLS, CRAFT AS WELL AS THE FUNDS. THE FUNDS WILL COME WHEN YOU ARE SKILLED AND CAN SELL YOURSELF
CONS? CONS? in 10.000€ CAMERA??!!??!
Its like watching top gear. :D
Just watched a samsung camera add on a sony camera review. Wtf youtube.....
Adam Sandler lookin a