@@bsadewitz I think tardigrades survive up to 300F. A single match head would destroy one. A 4mm nut with two bolts put into opposite ends would destroy a tardigrade. They’re incredibly durable for a living thing, especially a micro organism, but they’re not indestructible.
@@deltab9768 Incidentally, a 10 gigaton bomb would set fire to the country of France. They were working on one. thebulletin.org/2021/11/the-untold-story-of-the-worlds-biggest-nuclear-bomb/
Yes, all the nuke numbers to me are drastically wrong, but, I don't know what 'number' and base idea of destruction they are doing, are they talking directly vaporizing or directed explosive (total) damage, are they including radiation fallout to a number of kilometers. Are they basing this on the maths for atomic mass of given elements/structures, or given weight mass?? You asked/commented about the Great Wall of China, it is a fairly solid structure, and to 'demolish' it using explosives, open edged demolition (not using forced/timed/shaped charges) would take an inane amount of explosives, I could sit and do the maths numbers for it based upon average height/width/length and structural materials. When doing most demolition / controlled implosion / destruction things, you very often rely on gravity to do 70% or more of the work, the explosions are basically to cut vertical structural strength and push in a direction, gravity does almost all the energy work for you.
Tardigrades can only survive extremes when they go into 'hibrnation'. It takes time for that to happen, so if a nuke exploded near them and they weren't in hibernation, they're just as dead as anything else.
"Destroying a concept?" I assume they would give "infinity nukes" as the amount to destroy multiple... so would that be how many it takes to destroy the concepts of pressure, radiation and heat? That would be... interesting
you should watch Oliver Lugg's video "The Mass Extinction Debates: A Science Communication Odyssey", it's like a bobby broccoli documentary but about the extinction of the dinosaurs
I love how the jump from solar system to galaxy was just a 16 times increase. The average galaxy is 98.something billion solar systems. And there are between 2 to 4 trillion galaxies within the observable universe alone. Aka you will need at least a couple vigintillion nukes or 2×10^57 nukes. That is just for most likely a couple galactic clusters if not more.
Whoever put the little time researching into this meme should feel bad. I can’t even wrap my head around the concept of the nuke they are describing let alone the context of how their nuke is deployed. At this point it might as well be microwave ovens that short and set houses on fire. Numbers don’t add up from the get go and I feel like I’m getting dumber every time they put up a new number. Another video I won’t be able to finish watching. I feel my brain twisting and my blood pressure rising.
Why are you calling it a meme? And i kinda get your frustration, but why are you so angry at the original video that you feel the need to write such comment. Its obvious that those channels are led/videos are produced by people that are completely clueless in the matter and generally dont aim for scientific approaches or any kind of truth. They are only looking at and for money. Clickbait, false but quick "information" solely to trick the most basic people to watch it and maybe even on purpose make wrong claims, so that people end up commenting out of rage to boost the algorithm for them to make even more money. All i want to say is: just dont take them serious
@@Ahayeahishere I see you understand that they are out to get their junk boosted. But putting out feedback to the creator of a channel you actually like helps move the content to or from. Blind reviews are hit miss, but yeah… Kinda pointless to even waste more of my time on something that wasted my time.
As a texan, it feels so weird hearing I drove 30 or 40 miles and im still in the same city when there are some cities where you can drive for about an hour and be in the same one. Also not to mention that from west to east, its a 17.5 hour drive
... Yeah, you can definitely tell this is was built for clicks and factoids, *not* the destructive capabilities of nukes. Look no further than the Mount Everest and Olympus Mons comparison. Olympus mons description says it's 3 times the size of everest. Multiply Everest's result by 3, and you get Olympus Mon's nuke value. ... When Olympus mon's actual nuke being thrown around to remove it is probably closer to 3 squared to 3 cubed times larger simply because Olympus mons is a mound rather than a pointy bit sticking out of the continental shelf.
How can we know the number of nukes needed to destroy a black hole when we don't even know what sort of physical rules govern the space within the event horizon?
Dr Ben Miles made a video about China launching a Thorium Nuclear reactor. I'm curious as to your thoughts. Hope you do a review of his video at some point.
0.1 nuke to kill house? The number is wrong. I was under the impression that nuclear explosion were regarded in unit of how many TNT, much like horse power in unit for vehicle. If that was the case, shouldn't it be like a unit of eTNT, expotential TNT?
Could you react to Death Battle's Cole MacGrath vs Alex Mercer? It's a lot more ground in physics when compared to the universe busting Death Battles you've already watched.
I highly recommend you to make a reaction to video "Closed nuclear fuel cycle: practically inexhaustible energy is already almost within our reach!" from channel "Terra Physica" on RUclips. A small channel, few views, but, in fact, this is a translated version of the Russian-language popular science channel "Physics with Yuri Tkachev". And this channel is quite popular (300k), so the number and quality of details in the video is quite high. P.S. This is the third attempt to leave a comment. The previous ones, for some reason, are not displayed. So if you suddenly get a bunch of messages from me, then I'm sorry.
Not just did they get the continent order wrong, they listed USA as the 3rd largest country and implied there's 190 countries. China is 3rd, USA is 4th, and there are 193 UN member states plus two observer states.
Ranking depends on if you define it as the area they control (so including the territorial waters) or just the dry land. Total area, US is larger, total land, China is larger. Given the 9 dash line stuff China cares very much about the territorial waters, it’s not semantic.
I should say a big meteorite or more of them would do the trick? But they have to fall on all continents and is unlikely. But the way humanity is going, it will become unlivable on earth. And without nukes. That's more realistic.
Thank you Tyler! "0.1 nukes" well do you mean 0.1 Little Boys or 0.1 Tsar Bombas???? That alone is probably indicative of how the video will go...
Lol it's meaningless.
A tardigrade would be vaporized! Ill bet an M-80 could do it, but I don't KNOW.
@@bsadewitz I think tardigrades survive up to 300F. A single match head would destroy one.
A 4mm nut with two bolts put into opposite ends would destroy a tardigrade.
They’re incredibly durable for a living thing, especially a micro organism, but they’re not indestructible.
@@deltab9768 Incidentally, a 10 gigaton bomb would set fire to the country of France. They were working on one.
thebulletin.org/2021/11/the-untold-story-of-the-worlds-biggest-nuclear-bomb/
This is 5minutecraft quality, wouldn't surprise me if aichatbots were involved in the making...
5..4k nukes to destroy all BS videos like that? Where's the launch button? 🤣
You could kill a tardigrade with the back of a spoon.
Yes, all the nuke numbers to me are drastically wrong, but, I don't know what 'number' and base idea of destruction they are doing, are they talking directly vaporizing or directed explosive (total) damage, are they including radiation fallout to a number of kilometers.
Are they basing this on the maths for atomic mass of given elements/structures, or given weight mass??
You asked/commented about the Great Wall of China, it is a fairly solid structure, and to 'demolish' it using explosives, open edged demolition (not using forced/timed/shaped charges) would take an inane amount of explosives, I could sit and do the maths numbers for it based upon average height/width/length and structural materials. When doing most demolition / controlled implosion / destruction things, you very often rely on gravity to do 70% or more of the work, the explosions are basically to cut vertical structural strength and push in a direction, gravity does almost all the energy work for you.
Tardigrades can only survive extremes when they go into 'hibrnation'. It takes time for that to happen, so if a nuke exploded near them and they weren't in hibernation, they're just as dead as anything else.
Even if they were in hibernation, no tardigrade surviving millions of degrees of temperature lmao.
Tardigrades are still made of atoms; given all the fusion from 1 nuke going off next to it, a tardigrade is toast.
React to corridor crew how many solar panels could power the world, it talks about other sources of energy too including nuclear
seconded
Seconded as well
Fourthed
It's not 8300 nukes to destroy a black hole, it's 830 O as in, I suppose, octillion. How it's supposed to work, I have no idea. Total bollocks
He said that himself after mentioning 8300
@@Ahayeahishere missed it. Thx for pointing it out
The black hole will just be thankful to the nukes because black hole is actually bigger now by absorbing the energy of the nukes lmao.
Nukes are just free food for blackholes
How many nukes does it take to get to the tootsie-roll center of a Tootsie-pop?
I'd say +50
All of them.
Dude just straight up went "HuH, dUh, PyRaMiD hEaVy, 13 NuKeS"
Pulled numbers completely out his ass 😂
And why is it that very few understand nuclear energy or weapons ???
Oh yeah, drivel in videos like that 🤦♂️
Decades upon decades of anti-nuclear propaganda.
My head hurts. Those numbers for Jupiter, that is when I tapped out.
I could squash a tardigrade without any effort and this man's claiming it would take 5 nukes to kill it
Good vid tyler, keep up the good work!
You should watch Atomic Marvel's Human body vs Nuclear Explosion Simulation.
"source? it was revealed to me in a dream"
What about irregular nukes? 🤔
Just when I thought the sun was a nuclear reactor, someone wants to add more to it🤣
You need more subscirbers!
your videos are awsome!
"Destroying a concept?"
I assume they would give "infinity nukes" as the amount to destroy multiple... so would that be how many it takes to destroy the concepts of pressure, radiation and heat? That would be... interesting
you should watch Oliver Lugg's video "The Mass Extinction Debates: A Science Communication Odyssey", it's like a bobby broccoli documentary but about the extinction of the dinosaurs
I love how the jump from solar system to galaxy was just a 16 times increase. The average galaxy is 98.something billion solar systems.
And there are between 2 to 4 trillion galaxies within the observable universe alone. Aka you will need at least a couple vigintillion nukes or 2×10^57 nukes. That is just for most likely a couple galactic clusters if not more.
Whoever put the little time researching into this meme should feel bad.
I can’t even wrap my head around the concept of the nuke they are describing let alone the context of how their nuke is deployed.
At this point it might as well be microwave ovens that short and set houses on fire.
Numbers don’t add up from the get go and I feel like I’m getting dumber every time they put up a new number.
Another video I won’t be able to finish watching. I feel my brain twisting and my blood pressure rising.
Why are you calling it a meme? And i kinda get your frustration, but why are you so angry at the original video that you feel the need to write such comment. Its obvious that those channels are led/videos are produced by people that are completely clueless in the matter and generally dont aim for scientific approaches or any kind of truth. They are only looking at and for money. Clickbait, false but quick "information" solely to trick the most basic people to watch it and maybe even on purpose make wrong claims, so that people end up commenting out of rage to boost the algorithm for them to make even more money. All i want to say is: just dont take them serious
@@Ahayeahishere
I see you understand that they are out to get their junk boosted.
But putting out feedback to the creator of a channel you actually like helps move the content to or from.
Blind reviews are hit miss, but yeah…
Kinda pointless to even waste more of my time on something that wasted my time.
I live in Charlotte, My friend lives on the otherside of the city. I looked it up on google maps, the fastest drive is 35.8 miles. Still same city!
Thats insane
As a texan, it feels so weird hearing I drove 30 or 40 miles and im still in the same city when there are some cities where you can drive for about an hour and be in the same one. Also not to mention that from west to east, its a 17.5 hour drive
... Yeah, you can definitely tell this is was built for clicks and factoids, *not* the destructive capabilities of nukes. Look no further than the Mount Everest and Olympus Mons comparison. Olympus mons description says it's 3 times the size of everest. Multiply Everest's result by 3, and you get Olympus Mon's nuke value.
... When Olympus mon's actual nuke being thrown around to remove it is probably closer to 3 squared to 3 cubed times larger simply because Olympus mons is a mound rather than a pointy bit sticking out of the continental shelf.
How can we know the number of nukes needed to destroy a black hole when we don't even know what sort of physical rules govern the space within the event horizon?
400 nukes? The Soviets detonated more than that at the Semipalatinsk test site. Granted, it was not all at once.
Fun fact: if North Korea launches a missle at the U.S. it would AT LEAST command and 84 nuke response at minimum…(that’s what’s been released)
Seems like this video is going in reverse…
Dr Ben Miles made a video about China launching a Thorium Nuclear reactor. I'm curious as to your thoughts. Hope you do a review of his video at some point.
0.1 nuke to kill house? The number is wrong.
I was under the impression that nuclear explosion were regarded in unit of how many TNT, much like horse power in unit for vehicle. If that was the case, shouldn't it be like a unit of eTNT, expotential TNT?
My hometown is new york 💔
Could you react to Death Battle's Cole MacGrath vs Alex Mercer? It's a lot more ground in physics when compared to the universe busting Death Battles you've already watched.
Please react to "I Tried A Nuclear War Simulation" by Michelle Khare.
this comparison video has to be some kind of joke, these numbers are complete nonsense even if you know nothing about anything lmao.
First, also love what you add to these videos in commentary
Wait, are you telling me that the fallout series fatman mini nuke is based on a real thing
2:11 my home town is 54 people total
I'll have one regular nuke please. Do you have any fallout free options? My wife is allergic to strontium 90.
I can’t believe he even wasted his time on this silly video
I highly recommend you to make a reaction to video "Closed nuclear fuel cycle: practically inexhaustible energy is already almost within our reach!" from channel "Terra Physica" on RUclips. A small channel, few views, but, in fact, this is a translated version of the Russian-language popular science channel "Physics with Yuri Tkachev". And this channel is quite popular (300k), so the number and quality of details in the video is quite high. P.S. This is the third attempt to leave a comment. The previous ones, for some reason, are not displayed. So if you suddenly get a bunch of messages from me, then I'm sorry.
It's RUclips. They kill all sorts of comments for no discernable reason.
I’d like that too!
You got a discord?
htown
Not just did they get the continent order wrong, they listed USA as the 3rd largest country and implied there's 190 countries. China is 3rd, USA is 4th, and there are 193 UN member states plus two observer states.
Ranking depends on if you define it as the area they control (so including the territorial waters) or just the dry land. Total area, US is larger, total land, China is larger. Given the 9 dash line stuff China cares very much about the territorial waters, it’s not semantic.
Yeah pretty useless chart 😂😂👍
I should say a big meteorite or more of them would do the trick? But they have to fall on all continents and is unlikely. But the way humanity is going, it will become unlivable on earth. And without nukes. That's more realistic.
13:36 I mean Krakatoa collapsed a few minutes after eruption