The NK- 93 is the most efficiency engine ever developed..it has a very small core but it need two years of development to perfect it. They used heavy alloys unlike PD 14 with hollow blades
Only for Russian market now, it eat everything (still not full serial production). Also thats 1st gen of pd-14, not tested by life exploitation yet. If to be short the world must be doomed a little more, than today, to ignore the EU engine sertification rules.
If the NK-93 truly stared developing from '90s then we see that the proper investment in funds produce the desirable outcome and this is the PW1100G which to my opinion is a copy of NK-93 in means of propulsion. There is great potential in developing the NK-93
PD-14 is much Better. PD-14 is High bypass Turbofan Engine. MC-21 Irkutsk is a Civilian Passenger Jet! MC-21 needs the Dry Thrust to get with the Tonnage Lift for Smooth Flight.
so what, it have no rivals in russia. Those "best engines" just dont even exist in Russia (in some way). In some other countries too, in China too maybe in the near future.
A few months ago, I watched an airplane conference in Russia, where Evgeny Elin, Chairman of the Board of Directors of the C7 Group of Companies, he said that both engines are bad, why? Because they do not allow them to test the required number of hours on the ground, that is, russian government do not allow them to burn fuel for hundreds or thousands of hours, every engine needs it before going into production, but before the war in Ukraine with Russia and now, they won't let use fuel and think this it is waste of money, that is why every Russian engine is bad, not one company buy it, until russian government make them, and now because of sanctions they we have less elements to make those engines and it is hard to use Boeing and other planes because of the sanctions, hard to ship details to fix stolen Boeing planes.
@@mefobills279yeah it's a refining thing. Specialty Kerosene is what Jet fuel is. and that's like 5% of a barrel of oil at best. And it's even harder to get the additives and purification right than it is to process Bunker Fuel, Gasoline, Diesel, and plastic which are the other components of raw crude oil.
Another xoxol lying first the company is s7 and they did do an conference it's an airline company not a manufacturer 😂 and the test on the ground are standard practice world why have nothing to do with fuel burning lol wtf idk why you're lying with such confidence? The engines are ready the problem with ms-21 is some part made in the west are being replaced and test which take time so next year you'll see it in operation and the beginning of delivery in end of 2025 and stop lying xoxol
@@viewer-of-contentthat's completely false the guy is just lying about it there's enough kerosene to do testing there's no such test in pd14 because the engine is ready only the airplane parts made in the west are being replaced and tested which takes time stop believing nonsense 😭
boeing have no future, lol Maybe c919 have no f too, cause was made in cooperation with one-time "reliable partners" from interesting countries. Also c919 have no engines.
Exactly. Like, for example, Chinese cars. They captured the entire Asian market in 2 years, constantly increasing production, and already almost 40% of all cars that the world makes are Chinese. As we can see, Chinese cars have no future either.
The NK- 93 is the most efficiency engine ever developed..it has a very small core but it need two years of development to perfect it. They used heavy alloys unlike PD 14 with hollow blades
The PD-14 engine is best suited for the MC-21. It's more globally complaint & modular for much better ease of service.
They are best suited for everywhere where y dont want to ask for permission (LITERALLY.. dont joke) from USA\UK
MC-21 Is Making an Impact!!!
I would love to see these russian turbofan engines in the brazilian cargo plane Embraer KC-390, even fitted with russian avionics !
Only for Russian market now, it eat everything (still not full serial production).
Also thats 1st gen of pd-14, not tested by life exploitation yet.
If to be short the world must be doomed a little more, than today, to ignore the EU engine sertification rules.
If the NK-93 truly stared developing from '90s then we see that the proper investment in funds produce the desirable outcome and this is the PW1100G which to my opinion is a copy of NK-93 in means of propulsion. There is great potential in developing the NK-93
PD-14 is much Better.
PD-14 is High bypass Turbofan Engine.
MC-21 Irkutsk is a Civilian Passenger Jet!
MC-21 needs the Dry Thrust to get with the Tonnage Lift for Smooth Flight.
It's MS-21
Both of these engines are a generation behind their western counterparts.
And yet French leap engine manufacturer think otherwise. Propfan engine is future
so what, it have no rivals in russia. Those "best engines" just dont even exist in Russia (in some way). In some other countries too, in China too maybe in the near future.
20 mil usd per 1 engine.
A few months ago, I watched an airplane conference in Russia, where Evgeny Elin, Chairman of the Board of Directors of the C7 Group of Companies, he said that both engines are bad, why? Because they do not allow them to test the required number of hours on the ground, that is, russian government do not allow them to burn fuel for hundreds or thousands of hours, every engine needs it before going into production, but before the war in Ukraine with Russia and now, they won't let use fuel and think this it is waste of money, that is why every Russian engine is bad, not one company buy it, until russian government make them, and now because of sanctions they we have less elements to make those engines and it is hard to use Boeing and other planes because of the sanctions, hard to ship details to fix stolen Boeing planes.
Russia has lots of oil. Is it because of refining?
@@mefobills279yeah it's a refining thing. Specialty Kerosene is what Jet fuel is. and that's like 5% of a barrel of oil at best. And it's even harder to get the additives and purification right than it is to process Bunker Fuel, Gasoline, Diesel, and plastic which are the other components of raw crude oil.
Even the total cost of "stolen" Boeings can not make up for the Russian assets treacherously stolen by the US and Western gang bosses.
Another xoxol lying first the company is s7 and they did do an conference it's an airline company not a manufacturer 😂 and the test on the ground are standard practice world why have nothing to do with fuel burning lol wtf idk why you're lying with such confidence? The engines are ready the problem with ms-21 is some part made in the west are being replaced and test which take time so next year you'll see it in operation and the beginning of delivery in end of 2025 and stop lying xoxol
@@viewer-of-contentthat's completely false the guy is just lying about it there's enough kerosene to do testing there's no such test in pd14 because the engine is ready only the airplane parts made in the west are being replaced and tested which takes time stop believing nonsense 😭
All rubbish planes both this one and the c919 absolutely no future.
Respirez un peu, vous serez surpris !
@@infoscasti645😂
boeing have no future, lol
Maybe c919 have no f too, cause was made in cooperation with
one-time "reliable partners" from interesting countries. Also c919 have no engines.
Exactly. Like, for example, Chinese cars. They captured the entire Asian market in 2 years, constantly increasing production, and already almost 40% of all cars that the world makes are Chinese. As we can see, Chinese cars have no future either.
@teatimurin6345 sure only 40 % ? More like 75% no ? LMAO ! !