No shot you’re going with double duck and triple wanda instead of at very least the other way around. Running bear with triple pot of P is questionable
@@i_DarkFlame I get what you’re saying. If the bear deosn’t work out then I can always cut it for another duck. I was just mainly dabbling with the ratios
@@BlackCatYGOGaming the bear is fine, but i dont think playing 3 flourishing hills with only 2 duck makes any sense. Duck searches Anjelly, Petting, and all the vernusylphs. Flourishing hills only searches the vernusylphs... so Duck is just straight up better in madolche. I guess flourishing hills is better at being a level 4 but thats hardly ever relevant
![Simic Frogs VS Red Deck Wins [MTG Standard]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/rpcZeTmPm90/mqdefault.jpg)
BASED cat! :^) double up
wondering when us homies will get some Cyber Dragons or Dinozord support eh
No shot you’re going with double duck and triple wanda instead of at very least the other way around. Running bear with triple pot of P is questionable
@@i_DarkFlame I get what you’re saying. If the bear deosn’t work out then I can always cut it for another duck. I was just mainly dabbling with the ratios
@@BlackCatYGOGaming the bear is fine, but i dont think playing 3 flourishing hills with only 2 duck makes any sense. Duck searches Anjelly, Petting, and all the vernusylphs. Flourishing hills only searches the vernusylphs... so Duck is just straight up better in madolche. I guess flourishing hills is better at being a level 4 but thats hardly ever relevant