+Kyle Hill Praise where praise is due. Excellent vid. Always loved MIB. *Also* it wasnt just your Eng professor (as Im sure you know). Every physics professor in the world says that (and probably every engineering professor also). Keep up the great work!
+Kyle Hill When they are on the celing of the tunnel and hit an object, the car naturally, 'jumps' then 'sinks' back down to how it would while going over a speedbump; but upside down. Wouldn't that mean it would take EXTRA amount of thrust go counteract the objects projection back towards the surface of the planet? IE: More then 18.000N Vertical thrust? Or am I just awake way to early in the morning for my head-meats to be working properly? u_n
Now tell us how the memory erasing device works. I've always wanted to use one, but every time I try...what was I just talking about? Oh, a video on the MIB rocket car! I wonder if you can actually get one of those.
+Rami Ungar The memory thing is plausible. But It wouldn't work on members older then a day or so. At least not if it uses the thing I am thinking about to do it.
wouldn't the aerodynamics of the car also factor into how much trust you would need to keep it on the ceiling. I know that supercars are desined so that the faster they go the more they stick to the ground.
+SuperFreeEducation indeed there is a porsche modle with such high hp/weight ratio that with resonble spoilers (as seen on F1-cars) it would be possible to drive it up side down (at full speed)
For the elevation, you will need more than double the power that it would need if you want just to hold it on the air, for 3 reasons: 1)It needs to be elevated, not just hold 2)It needs to hold/elevate also the passengers 3)When a car is working it touches the ground and has a mass, with your calculations the "floating" car will not have this "mass" while touching the shilling so it needs about the double power to be able to move "having the same/opposite mass" while touching the shilling.
I love this channel, it's fun and you learn stuff and also when I'm having a bad day and everything feels bleurgh, listening to Kyle being enthusiastic about things makes the world seem I much better place and I feel better.
This to me is a PERFECT example of why applied math/science is so important. One of my teachers tried to explain something like this in high school. Couldn't wrap my head around it. Here it makes a LOT more sense.
The good thing about binge watching these is that I can tell myself I'm technically learning and therefore justified, I really do love this series you deserve a tv program. Also would you ever consider making one about when Han was frozen in Empire strikes back?
+Pearls For cats That means a lot to me, thank you. Ha of course I'd love to do a similar TV program (I'm working on that). Han Solo stuff is always on the table.
About the F1 cars, and the rear spoilers. I just wanted to add that it is actually a combination of the rear spoiler and the inverted canards (designed like airplane wings, but installed upside down) in the front that provide down force.
Two things... First, the novel (and I think some early versions of the screenplay) talk about the wheels making a "sticky sound" when they hit the tunnel wall, pointing towards some kind of adhesive tyres which would reduce the thrust required for keeping the car pinned to the ceiling. Second, you didn't factor in the weight of rocket engines and propellent into your car...
To be fair, due to the whole actually pushing against the ceiling thing, and the resulting friction, that could increase just how much force is needed to keep the car moving forward and possibly reduce vertical force needed via some sort of traction with the tires.
Hi Kyle, I'm just in love with this video and I'd like to ask you if you can allow the option to us to provide subtitles to your videos(I'm brazilian and I think that everyone in the world should have acces to the this lesson/etertainment show)
Exacly you wound need to consider the format of the car to see how the air could pass throught it to see the drag force, also the friction with the wheels also would help keep the car on the ceiling. Don't isolate only one variable in cases many apply.
Glad you mentioned spoilers, that's the first thing that came to mind when I heard the question. It would totally change the equation and would explain why the rockets don't have to be angled at 88 degrees but can be fairly horizontal.
I hate to be that guy but the movie omitted/didn't show another component to the car that was in the book (Yes there is a book that is slightly more detailed). In the book, it expresses that J heard a sucking sound underneath the car upon transforming. This may be another mechanism to aide the upside-down run. This would allow less of the lift to be derived by the rockets leaving them for mostly forward propulsion. Meaning less of a thrust angle. I could also point out many other factors that would result in this stunt being more plausible including the briefly touched upon aerodynamic factors. All that aside I understand the point of this video was to explain/illustrate the math behind the scenes of these videos. I love these episodes and hope to see many more. Keep up the good work.
So, if the MIB car had the same (or even half) the level of down-thrust as a formula 1 car, how does that change your rocket requirements? Bonus question: How much down-thrust would be necessary to get the angle of the rockets into the realm of the current range of motion of vector-able rockets?
You would also need to take into the weight of the rockets, the fuel for those rockets, The multiple space weapons in the back, and other weird spacey space stuff.
Glad you mentionned the F1 cars because, aside that the rocketcar only drove 117km/h (~72mi/h) fast what bugs me, the F1 car developps a downforce equal to 1,3 Tonns driving only 140km/h. So the MIB car doesn't even need a rocket, it only has to change its shape (which it does) into a form that develops more downforce than the F1 car. Seeing in another scene that it has already alot of power and torque with its "stock" engine, I'm shure the car drives faster than 140km/h already in its normal mode.
Kyle, I'd like to point out a small mistake. Their weight would be 80 kgs each(1:24). Weight is already mass times Gravitational acceleration. So their mass should be around 8 Kgs That one zero can make huge differences. Mass is constant but weight can differ by the planets. Thus is due to the different gravitational acceleration.
As a suggestion for an upcoming video, you should do the video on that old anime show Berserk, the dudes sword is massive so how could he carry that thing.
and here I thought I'm the only one. His face is of Felicity's and his hair is of Thor's.
8 лет назад+1
+DeadPool Junior. Hahahahha, This is so true.. Hey +Kyle Hill Take this! The Mystery is solved! wait.. Then.. INCEPTION?! MARVEL AND DC MADE A MIRACLE? (Joking aside. You could easily pass of as Thor's relative. Or Felicity's)
+DeadPool Junior. holy fuck that is so true... i knew the lookes resemble Thor, but i just couldn't remember where i've seen those simmilar face expressions. Thank you good sir.
Can you do a video on what the hell is in Bane's super-steroid "Venom"? I wanna know what the hell could do that and whether it would actually make the body bulk up that quickly like that?
Love the segment getting super nerdy, but you forgot to include the weight of the rockets themselves into the equation. Using the RD 0410's have an unfueled mass of 2000kg each, more than tripling the weight of the car and therefor drastically increasing the force needed to keep it to the ceiling.
Imagine the rockets popping out of the trunk at an 88 degree angle. Not only would that look hilarious, it would probably also instantly destroy the rear axle with it's (downwards) thrust. Also, since jet engines aren't made of pure plasma, they weigh something too. Would have been interesting to know how much extra that russian rocket you mentioned actually weighs. But it's thrust probably still be enough. My theory on the MIB Car would be that it deploys some wings/spoilers simultaneously with the rocket to use downforce just like F1 Cars or the Gumpert Apollo, which looks (a tiny little :D) more like a "real" car, with covered wheels, driver cabin etc.. But they don't show that in the movie, and so I guess this then is the way they should have done it to be scientifically correct. Also, I wouldn't have thought about this anyway without the video, thanks for the effort and great explanation Kyle!
Hey Kyle hi awsome episode by any chanse what did you study in your college years just curious because it seams very interesting and i would like to know was it engenering, physics?
Except none of fictional nerds make any sense,even to their own colleagues, talks way too fast when explaining difficult parts,and uses too much of non existent terminologies without explaining Anything.Basically, the opposite of Kyle.
You should do something on electro specifically 2.0 (the one from amazing spider man 2) and how he was able to carry the electric charge without him electrocuting himself and dying just an idea though also great job on the vids this is one of my favorite things to watch in RUclips
It would be awesome but they will likely never do it. F1 cars typically don't have roofs. Not to mention the roof of a tunnel is probably not designed for driving on. Unless it's relatively flat the ride could severely jostle the driver leading to an accident. Or if the bumps are to big it could slow the car down reducing down force from the wings ( wing is the correct term for F1 cars as a spoiler is just used to create turbulence to reduce lift. wings on F1 cars as well as many other cars do the opposite of airplane wings by making down force to keep the vehicle pressed against the ground. this is necessary due to the the design of almost every car. Air traveling under a car car usually has a shorter path than the air that is pushed over it which like a normal airplane wing cuases the air on top of a car to speed up resulting in lower pressure above the car. Even a slight difference in pressure spread out over the relatively huge surface area of the underside of a car will produce a lot of lift. When that happens the tires don't get enough traction to accelerate the car or steer it. Wings do have a significant downside though as they create a lot of drag, however many unique methods of producing down force with less drag have been developed such as one car that used a fan to remove most of the air under the car. That like many other ideas had some flaws that made them impractical.)( If your wondering the difference between the wings on a plane and on an F1 car is that the wing on cars is upside down compared to a plane wing. It produces the opposite effect as I mentioned prior to me editing this into my comment.) anyway the primary reason they wouldn't do that is because most insurance policies don't cover driving multi-million dollar F1 cars on a roof and all the accidents that could cause.
I feel like the difficulty that would still arise in engineering this would be swiveling the rocket so that could generate the force in the proper direction to get the car off of the ground and onto the wall in the first place.
i would want to know how much thrust would it take to keep the car on the ceiling whilst the rockets are at an angle similar to how they were in the movie. now that would be a long tunnel.
I really dig your show. Have you ever seen the theory that a Formula One car can drive on the ceiling of a tunnel? I guess the wings generate enough downforce to overcome gravity and can theoretically pin the car to the ceiling.The aerodynamics of a Formula One car are fascinating. Future episode..?
Now considering the top speed of the car, and its aerodynamics, would be nice to find the real angle of the rockets.. Maybe the angle now would be closer to the one in the movie?
There is an error in this scene, and is the hair of agent K, it falls down without being pull backwards, with the current energy being use to push forward, his hair should never fall the way it did.
I typically blank when I see numbers, equations and anything that has to do with trigonometry, but I think I kind of understood most of what you explained here... High five!
I hate math in school but love physics and sciences. And everyone says I can't be a engineer, or and inventor. This show makes me way more interested in the equations.
You would also have the force of the air pushing on the car, helping the car being kept on the sealing. So the rockets shouldn't have to be on such a sharp angle.
Also the tickets in the movie likely use some sort of alien technology making even an estimate of it's weight as well as the additional weight of fuel it would likely be carrying inaccurate. What Kyle likely did was find an appropriately sized engine with sufficient thrust to weight to lift the car.
Kyle I have a question: are terran or martian kataphrakts from anime Aldnah Zero possible, and what equipment from martian ones can be made on our earth? like all anihilating barrier from first 3 episodes.
Hi! please make a video of how to explain scientifically what would it take to make an indestructible material like captain's shield or adamantium :P that would be interesting
Can you do a video on whether or not Spiderman 2099 could even exist? Unlike the normal Spider-Man, this one was altered on a genetic level. He literally half spider. He has Fangs, venom, retractable talons, and spinnerets going up to his elbow on both arms. (He also has enhanced senses, and super strength. He lacks a spider sense like the original Spider-Man however.) Could a genetic mutation or a human genome be restructured to allow for this?
This isn't really huge but they probably travelled less than 1955 meters because they were already some ways inside the tunnel when they started, although it would be hard to figure out exactly where. Also there's the weight of the rockets, but also all the other mods done to the car (like the dummy driver). But that's neither here nor there
Because science is my favorite series on RUclips.
Thank you so so much!
+Kyle Hill Praise where praise is due. Excellent vid. Always loved MIB. *Also* it wasnt just your Eng professor (as Im sure you know). Every physics professor in the world says that (and probably every engineering professor also). Keep up the great work!
+Kyle Hill When they are on the celing of the tunnel and hit an object, the car naturally, 'jumps' then 'sinks' back down to how it would while going over a speedbump; but upside down. Wouldn't that mean it would take EXTRA amount of thrust go counteract the objects projection back towards the surface of the planet? IE: More then 18.000N Vertical thrust? Or am I just awake way to early in the morning for my head-meats to be working properly? u_n
hey me to
well what he said is it required a minimum of 18kN of thrust to keep it up, but odds are they had at least a big more. maybe even twice as much.
Now tell us how the memory erasing device works. I've always wanted to use one, but every time I try...what was I just talking about? Oh, a video on the MIB rocket car! I wonder if you can actually get one of those.
+Rami Ungar The memory thing is plausible. But It wouldn't work on members older then a day or so. At least not if it uses the thing I am thinking about to do it.
+Rami Ungar i would suspect it uses a yet to be discovered form of energy to lobotomize them in a overly precise way.
Hollywood magic
wouldn't the aerodynamics of the car also factor into how much trust you would need to keep it on the ceiling. I know that supercars are desined so that the faster they go the more they stick to the ground.
+SuperFreeEducation oh I guess my bad lol. why you should watch the whole video first.
+SuperFreeEducation I also think it happens because of the air resistance
***** well it depends on how its designed it basically the reverse concept of how aeroplanes fly.
Yes, to be fair, he mentions spoilers at the end BUT did not factor that force into his equations at all.
+SuperFreeEducation indeed there is a porsche modle with such high hp/weight ratio that with resonble spoilers (as seen on F1-cars) it would be possible to drive it up side down (at full speed)
you know what make your show the best on youtube kyle , you're doing it with passion , happy new year to you :D
+who made this picture Thank you so much! Happy new year to you as well
"Touch it...for science." Kyle Hill 2015
For the elevation, you will need more than double the power that it would need if you want just to hold it on the air, for 3 reasons:
1)It needs to be elevated, not just hold
2)It needs to hold/elevate also the passengers
3)When a car is working it touches the ground and has a mass, with your calculations the "floating" car will not have this "mass" while touching the shilling so it needs about the double power to be able to move "having the same/opposite mass" while touching the shilling.
I love this channel, it's fun and you learn stuff and also when I'm having a bad day and everything feels bleurgh, listening to Kyle being enthusiastic about things makes the world seem I much better place and I feel better.
"never ever push the red button"
the subscribe button is red, so we should never ever sub, right kyle?
MegaMGstudios nice
This is how we should learn physics in school. It's so much more fun.
+Lessien Séregon Agreed.
+Lessien Séregon Made my day
+Lessien Séregon
Everything is easier with the context of application.
+Lessien Séregon That's sooooo true. There are some teachers that are really cool and try to make it fun, but it should be a requirement. XD
+Lessien Séregon considering how boring my teacher is.i agree
This to me is a PERFECT example of why applied math/science is so important. One of my teachers tried to explain something like this in high school. Couldn't wrap my head around it. Here it makes a LOT more sense.
dude you are the first make these things so interesting i actually focus for the whole video
This is everything I love about physics! One equation to another to another. Just delicious!
The good thing about binge watching these is that I can tell myself I'm technically learning and therefore justified, I really do love this series you deserve a tv program. Also would you ever consider making one about when Han was frozen in Empire strikes back?
+Pearls For cats That means a lot to me, thank you. Ha of course I'd love to do a similar TV program (I'm working on that). Han Solo stuff is always on the table.
He should be the new Professor Proton.
Yeah the math and science are cool, but the main reason I watch this series is for Kyle's hair
i like this show, don't stop guy! it sucks that more ppl don't watch it but its great!
Great video! Keep up the good work.
Even though I started watching recently I love your videos, short but packed with fun information :)
Thank you!
After binge watching all your videos, I can't help but to finish my arguments with "Because science"
+Ana Lucia A. That's exactly what I've always wanted
About the F1 cars, and the rear spoilers. I just wanted to add that it is actually a combination of the rear spoiler and the inverted canards (designed like airplane wings, but installed upside down) in the front that provide down force.
You didnt add the rockets weight
Two things...
First, the novel (and I think some early versions of the screenplay) talk about the wheels making a "sticky sound" when they hit the tunnel wall, pointing towards some kind of adhesive tyres which would reduce the thrust required for keeping the car pinned to the ceiling.
Second, you didn't factor in the weight of rocket engines and propellent into your car...
To be fair, due to the whole actually pushing against the ceiling thing, and the resulting friction, that could increase just how much force is needed to keep the car moving forward and possibly reduce vertical force needed via some sort of traction with the tires.
Hi Kyle, I'm just in love with this video and I'd like to ask you if you can allow the option to us to provide subtitles to your videos(I'm brazilian and I think that everyone in the world should have acces to the this lesson/etertainment show)
Exacly you wound need to consider the format of the car to see how the air could pass throught it to see the drag force, also the friction with the wheels also would help keep the car on the ceiling. Don't isolate only one variable in cases many apply.
This dude is amazing. Not just for the obvious reasons, but he can write backwards, with his left hand with perfect handwriting.
Another great video, Kyle! Keep them coming!
Glad you mentioned spoilers, that's the first thing that came to mind when I heard the question. It would totally change the equation and would explain why the rockets don't have to be angled at 88 degrees but can be fairly horizontal.
I hate to be that guy but the movie omitted/didn't show another component to the car that was in the book (Yes there is a book that is slightly more detailed).
In the book, it expresses that J heard a sucking sound underneath the car upon transforming.
This may be another mechanism to aide the upside-down run.
This would allow less of the lift to be derived by the rockets leaving them for mostly forward propulsion.
Meaning less of a thrust angle.
I could also point out many other factors that would result in this stunt being more plausible including the briefly touched upon aerodynamic factors.
All that aside I understand the point of this video was to explain/illustrate the math behind the scenes of these videos.
I love these episodes and hope to see many more. Keep up the good work.
+Nerdist Kinda curious. You found the amount of Newtons needed for the car and the passengers, but what about the extra mass b/c of the engines?
So, if the MIB car had the same (or even half) the level of down-thrust as a formula 1 car, how does that change your rocket requirements?
Bonus question: How much down-thrust would be necessary to get the angle of the rockets into the realm of the current range of motion of vector-able rockets?
This channel is so amazing so much science :D
What about the drag and aeros of the crown Vic though? How would they effect the angle/speed needed?
"Touch it...for science." is my new pick-up line.
You would also need to take into the weight of the rockets, the fuel for those rockets, The multiple space weapons in the back, and other weird spacey space stuff.
So that's how I am spending my New Year's Eve... AWESOME
Glad you mentionned the F1 cars because, aside that the rocketcar only drove 117km/h (~72mi/h) fast what bugs me, the F1 car developps a downforce equal to 1,3 Tonns driving only 140km/h. So the MIB car doesn't even need a rocket, it only has to change its shape (which it does) into a form that develops more downforce than the F1 car. Seeing in another scene that it has already alot of power and torque with its "stock" engine, I'm shure the car drives faster than 140km/h already in its normal mode.
Kyle, I'd like to point out a small mistake.
Their weight would be 80 kgs each(1:24).
Weight is already mass times Gravitational acceleration. So their mass should be around 8 Kgs
That one zero can make huge differences.
Mass is constant but weight can differ by the planets. Thus is due to the different gravitational acceleration.
Best pickup line in the world. "Touch it... For science."
Love that my college physics knowledge still helps me follow this lol
how does the memory flash thingy from mib work
Can you answer the noisy cricket from MIB
As a suggestion for an upcoming video, you should do the video on that old anime show Berserk, the dudes sword is massive so how could he carry that thing.
You forgot to factor in the weight of the rockets and weapons. Also, Agent J would be roughly 100kg.
Lmao "plugging and chuggjng" Made me cry laughing.
2:10 No, it has to at least provide thrust twice as big as gravitational pull. If it only provides 18000N there is no force pinning the tires down.
you look like thor had a hot love child with felicity smoak
and here I thought I'm the only one. His face is of Felicity's and his hair is of Thor's.
+DeadPool Junior. Hahahahha, This is so true.. Hey +Kyle Hill Take this! The Mystery is solved! wait.. Then.. INCEPTION?! MARVEL AND DC MADE A MIRACLE? (Joking aside. You could easily pass of as Thor's relative. Or Felicity's)
that is actually really accurate
+DeadPool Junior. holy fuck that is so true... i knew the lookes resemble Thor, but i just couldn't remember where i've seen those simmilar face expressions. Thank you good sir.
+DeadPool Junior. yes
what about the lift provided by air resistance on the car, like wings on a plane? I always thought that's what kept it pinned.
Can you do a video on what the hell is in Bane's super-steroid "Venom"? I wanna know what the hell could do that and whether it would actually make the body bulk up that quickly like that?
Already learnt more from this than primary school, two high schools AND two colleges combined.
Man you remembered me about my tests in physics and maths after the holydays but in a cool way
Plz do a video on damage comparison with automatic guns with a 50 round clip vs a sniper rifle with a 5 round clip
Love the segment getting super nerdy, but you forgot to include the weight of the rockets themselves into the equation.
Using the RD 0410's have an unfueled mass of 2000kg each, more than tripling the weight of the car and therefor drastically increasing the force needed to keep it to the ceiling.
Kyle man the mirroring and reverse writing .....awesome ......and you do it very fluently too........takes a lot of practice I believe
Imagine the rockets popping out of the trunk at an 88 degree angle. Not only would that look hilarious, it would probably also instantly destroy the rear axle with it's (downwards) thrust. Also, since jet engines aren't made of pure plasma, they weigh something too. Would have been interesting to know how much extra that russian rocket you mentioned actually weighs.
But it's thrust probably still be enough. My theory on the MIB Car would be that it deploys some wings/spoilers simultaneously with the rocket to use downforce just like F1 Cars or the Gumpert Apollo, which looks (a tiny little :D) more like a "real" car, with covered wheels, driver cabin etc.. But they don't show that in the movie, and so I guess this then is the way they should have done it to be scientifically correct. Also, I wouldn't have thought about this anyway without the video, thanks for the effort and great explanation Kyle!
Hey Kyle hi awsome episode by any chanse what did you study in your college years just curious because it seams very interesting and i would like to know was it engenering, physics?
He is like the male version of felicity smoke from arrow
Felicity smoke has black hair
+bob spocinski um...so?
Rayshio Tile he has blond and she has black
+bob spocinski yes and it is irrelevant
Except none of fictional nerds make any sense,even to their own colleagues, talks way too fast when explaining difficult parts,and uses too much of non existent terminologies without explaining Anything.Basically, the opposite of Kyle.
You should do something on electro specifically 2.0 (the one from amazing spider man 2) and how he was able to carry the electric charge without him electrocuting himself and dying just an idea though also great job on the vids this is one of my favorite things to watch in RUclips
also what about the additional mass of the rockets?
I understand physics more from this episodes than my actual classes
Thrust triangle is my fav new thing
Oh my god, I think Top Gear should drive an F1 car on the ceiling! I think that'd be fun to watch
It would be awesome but they will likely never do it. F1 cars typically don't have roofs. Not to mention the roof of a tunnel is probably not designed for driving on. Unless it's relatively flat the ride could severely jostle the driver leading to an accident. Or if the bumps are to big it could slow the car down reducing down force from the wings ( wing is the correct term for F1 cars as a spoiler is just used to create turbulence to reduce lift. wings on F1 cars as well as many other cars do the opposite of airplane wings by making down force to keep the vehicle pressed against the ground. this is necessary due to the the design of almost every car. Air traveling under a car car usually has a shorter path than the air that is pushed over it which like a normal airplane wing cuases the air on top of a car to speed up resulting in lower pressure above the car. Even a slight difference in pressure spread out over the relatively huge surface area of the underside of a car will produce a lot of lift. When that happens the tires don't get enough traction to accelerate the car or steer it. Wings do have a significant downside though as they create a lot of drag, however many unique methods of producing down force with less drag have been developed such as one car that used a fan to remove most of the air under the car. That like many other ideas had some flaws that made them impractical.)( If your wondering the difference between the wings on a plane and on an F1 car is that the wing on cars is upside down compared to a plane wing. It produces the opposite effect as I mentioned prior to me editing this into my comment.) anyway the primary reason they wouldn't do that is because most insurance policies don't cover driving multi-million dollar F1 cars on a roof and all the accidents that could cause.
Throughout the whole video I was like, "An f1 car can do that without the rockets" and I was waiting for you to say that 😂
Thumbs up for the sugar in water line, great video.
Nerdist, I was brought because I saw your vid about Kylo Ren's lightsaber. I wish you had been my science teacher.
+Charlie O That is so nice to hear, thank you!
+Kyle Hill You're fake
PROVE IT
Kyle Hill boi
1:10 You forgot the rocket's mass!! lol
I feel like the difficulty that would still arise in engineering this would be swiveling the rocket so that could generate the force in the proper direction to get the car off of the ground and onto the wall in the first place.
i would want to know how much thrust would it take to keep the car on the ceiling whilst the rockets are at an angle similar to how they were in the movie. now that would be a long tunnel.
And this is my favorite place on the Citadel
Do a vid about the lancer from gears of war.
I was gonna say something about air resistance but then you mentioned it at the end.
I love his narration
I learn more from this channel than I do at school.
"Don't ever touch the red button" ... oooh, I wanted to subscribe ...
I really dig your show.
Have you ever seen the theory that a Formula One car can drive on the ceiling of a tunnel? I guess the wings generate enough downforce to overcome gravity and can theoretically pin the car to the ceiling.The aerodynamics of a Formula One car are fascinating. Future episode..?
Oh my God... I wrote that comment before I finished watching the video, and of course you address F1 cars. Don't I feel stupid?
You didn't account for the weight of the actual thruster, and the air resistance, although I doubt it would change too much
hey this episode help me with my geometry homework thanks
hey can you make a video on how does star wars use "the force" and can we use it in real life?
Now considering the top speed of the car, and its aerodynamics, would be nice to find the real angle of the rockets.. Maybe the angle now would be closer to the one in the movie?
Best looking nerd EVER! Thank the gods of science and beauty for creating an amazing specimen!!
you just answer my math teacher questions.thank you very much
There is an error in this scene, and is the hair of agent K, it falls down without being pull backwards, with the current energy being use to push forward, his hair should never fall the way it did.
I typically blank when I see numbers, equations and anything that has to do with trigonometry, but I think I kind of understood most of what you explained here... High five!
Would the heat coming off the rockets have any effect on the cars below?
I hate math in school but love physics and sciences. And everyone says I can't be a engineer, or and inventor. This show makes me way more interested in the equations.
+RYAN HUESEMAN That is awesome.
so do they flip the image when he draws or is he really that good writing backwards for the camera to see it?
Touch it...For Science. Best pick up line ever
The most nerdy Because Science yet!! More science and math then jokes. Although, plug and chug is so funny.
You would also have the force of the air pushing on the car, helping the car being kept on the sealing. So the rockets shouldn't have to be on such a sharp angle.
My high school algebra teacher used the phrase "plug and chug" all the time, Kyle
you only counted the weight of the car and the passengers, but dont the rockets also have quite a bit of mass?
Oh shit that's true
Very true, but the rockets I mentioned have more than enough thrust to account for that (if you use two like in the movie).
+Kyle Hill that's true too dammit
+Steve Matousek lmao
Also the tickets in the movie likely use some sort of alien technology making even an estimate of it's weight as well as the additional weight of fuel it would likely be carrying inaccurate. What Kyle likely did was find an appropriately sized engine with sufficient thrust to weight to lift the car.
Kyle I have a question: are terran or martian kataphrakts from anime Aldnah Zero possible, and what equipment from martian ones can be made on our earth? like all anihilating barrier from first 3 episodes.
Touch it... for science 😉
+Kyle Hill...could the car hold the amount of fuel required to make that run?
Hi! please make a video of how to explain scientifically what would it take to make an indestructible material like captain's shield or adamantium :P that would be interesting
Can you do a video on whether or not Spiderman 2099 could even exist? Unlike the normal Spider-Man, this one was altered on a genetic level. He literally half spider. He has Fangs, venom, retractable talons, and spinnerets going up to his elbow on both arms. (He also has enhanced senses, and super strength. He lacks a spider sense like the original Spider-Man however.) Could a genetic mutation or a human genome be restructured to allow for this?
you should explain how the star wars guns work
Quick question: did you also take into account the weight of the rockets too?
This isn't really huge but they probably travelled less than 1955 meters because they were already some ways inside the tunnel when they started, although it would be hard to figure out exactly where.
Also there's the weight of the rockets, but also all the other mods done to the car (like the dummy driver). But that's neither here nor there
Is this guy right handed? Is this recorded in reverse and then flipped. Because if not this guy's got some great skill and writing backwards.
+Ronny DarKo 3:36
NJ, Kyle! Cool vid.
+Mark Rudy Thank you Mark. Glad you're sticking around.
Kyle Hill As I said, I really like the concept, just hope you will be more litigious, even if it is pretty light-hearted.