BMD-4M Airborne Assault Vehicle

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 20 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 139

  • @sternencolonel7328
    @sternencolonel7328 2 года назад +74

    pretty impressive firepower for an airborne vehicle

    • @northernstar3960
      @northernstar3960 2 года назад +26

      No other airborne vehicle have 100 mm cannon with ATGM capability + 30 mm autocannon and 7,62 coaxial machine gun. What this vehicle needs is additional ERA armor pack and grills. And it's ready to fight.

    • @Veldtian1
      @Veldtian1 Год назад +5

      @@northernstar3960 what it really needs is a polyurea/boron carbide tile/uhmpe laminate cloak.

    • @JeanLucCaptain
      @JeanLucCaptain Год назад +3

      @@northernstar3960 that is the turret from the BMP-3. though i would imagine it has been modified to shave as much weight as possible.

    • @jonny2954
      @jonny2954 5 месяцев назад +2

      As usual with Soviet/Russian vehicles. Lots of dakka but extremely handicapped by bad optronics, fire control and armor protection.

    • @alexnderrrthewoke4479
      @alexnderrrthewoke4479 5 месяцев назад

      ​@@jonny2954are you on coke?

  • @herohero-fw1vc
    @herohero-fw1vc 2 года назад +16

    Very impressive design & firepower for a small vehicle......

  • @hope8612
    @hope8612 2 года назад +14

    Браћо са вама смо Србија Русија браћа заувек

  • @vadim-2068
    @vadim-2068 2 года назад +17

    Great car ! She showed herself well in battles

    • @jeffreyprezalar220
      @jeffreyprezalar220 Год назад +4

      No it hasnt it gets hit by 2 40 mm grenades and it goes up like petrol bomb

    • @lexburen5932
      @lexburen5932 Год назад +4

      @@jeffreyprezalar220 yes off course. no military vehicle is invincible. Just like the flop F35 keeps falling out of the sky

    • @alexnderrrthewoke4479
      @alexnderrrthewoke4479 5 месяцев назад +1

      ​@@lexburen5932😂😂😂💀💀💀💀

    • @alexnderrrthewoke4479
      @alexnderrrthewoke4479 5 месяцев назад +1

      ​@@jeffreyprezalar220it holds better than burning abrams cemetery in ukraine

    • @AsbestosEnjoyer
      @AsbestosEnjoyer Месяц назад

      @@jeffreyprezalar220of course it does, it's armor is basically the same grade as standard issue body armor, that is to say, stops 7,62 nato on a good day, if even that

  • @johaneslerius9943
    @johaneslerius9943 2 года назад +28

    I love it 😍😍😍😍😍
    From Indonesian🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩

  • @satheeshnarayanan701
    @satheeshnarayanan701 2 года назад +14

    I wish it incorporates 750 hp engine, APS, ERA Panels at the expense of it's overall weight (even upto 25 tonnes).

    • @RiccardoTheBeAst
      @RiccardoTheBeAst 2 года назад +12

      The heavier version already exist, it's BMP-3. BMD-4 has to remain light-weight to be air transportable and air droppable ;)

    • @JeanLucCaptain
      @JeanLucCaptain Год назад +3

      it is an air assault vehicle it is already having to shave weight everywhere it possibly can.

    • @AsbestosEnjoyer
      @AsbestosEnjoyer Месяц назад

      @@RiccardoTheBeAstyeah but it could be a bit heavier, as what is the likelihood of airborne troops having to cross a river or something bigger than what they could just drive through? And even if they came up to a river, wouldn't it be easier to hold the riverbank and wait for the enemy counterattack over it?

  • @rockval.1061
    @rockval.1061 2 года назад +23

    Excelente vehículo
    🇲🇽🙏🇷🇺
    ❤️

  • @EVGENIVS-LXIII
    @EVGENIVS-LXIII 2 года назад +15

    Вещь!!!👍👍👍✊

  • @WinstonSmith6
    @WinstonSmith6 2 года назад +15

    I want to see the video of an airdrop with the crew inside. That must be nerve wrecking.

    • @Snortolodmyr-SS-Cokelensky
      @Snortolodmyr-SS-Cokelensky Год назад +3

      The crew is not inside during an airdrop…

    • @jarinorvanto4301
      @jarinorvanto4301 Год назад +3

      @@Snortolodmyr-SS-Cokelensky Oh yes, "even with the crew inside the vehicle, truly a unique potential"!

    • @ilijaspasojevic7031
      @ilijaspasojevic7031 9 месяцев назад

      @@Snortolodmyr-SS-Cokelensky @Jari Norvanto is absolutely right..

  • @NoahBranch503
    @NoahBranch503 2 месяца назад +1

    The engineer is asking hey how many guns should the turret have designer says yes guns😂

  • @carmanahdoang1951
    @carmanahdoang1951 2 года назад +4

    Urraaaa.... From Indonesia 👍👍

  • @typhoon2643
    @typhoon2643 2 года назад +7

    Impressionnant 🤩👍

  • @lucianogomesgutierrez1629
    @lucianogomesgutierrez1629 2 года назад +14

    🇧🇷❤️🇷🇺

  • @jawedmanowar657
    @jawedmanowar657 2 года назад +4

    In this Gun Turret an 50 caliber Gattling gun type should also made to provide high volume high Firr Power to overwhelm enemy Defence with Secondary Air defence role inbuilt in it

    • @playoffmodesp2536
      @playoffmodesp2536 Год назад

      It has a coaxial 50. Cal already doesn't it?

    • @henrik_worst_of_sinners
      @henrik_worst_of_sinners Год назад +3

      7,62x54mmr, wich is more than enough to chew up infantry.
      50 cal is redundant as it has a 30mm autocanon. 50 cal is a "neither here nor there" caliber anyway.

    • @playoffmodesp2536
      @playoffmodesp2536 Год назад

      @@henrik_worst_of_sinners fair I thought it was 12,7 mm side cannon. But the more I think about it, it wouldn't make any sense since they already have a 30 mm automatic anti-material cannon.

    • @norbertaronvarga5361
      @norbertaronvarga5361 Год назад

      Looking away from it's unusability, 50 caliber barrel length, but what caliber? 12,7mm? 20mm? 30mm? 127mm? 406mm?

    • @playoffmodesp2536
      @playoffmodesp2536 Год назад +2

      @@norbertaronvarga5361 the .50 caliber is exclusively 12,7mm. Therefore all the cannon diameters you listed don't apply. 406 mm is a WW2 naval gun type battery. It's ludicrous to call that a .50 cal. No the .50 BMG is 12,7mm pistol, rifle, MG all same diameter

  • @jttoe3424
    @jttoe3424 Год назад +1

    Will see more of this on the battle front...

  • @zackyloekman8818
    @zackyloekman8818 7 месяцев назад +1

    Light but has heavy weapons

  • @zorbaknecromancer
    @zorbaknecromancer 2 года назад +2

    You can play for free now in War Thunder! War Thunder is a free-to-play vehicular combat multiplayer video game developed and published by Gaijin Entertainment.

  • @mochabdu88
    @mochabdu88 9 месяцев назад

    Inovasi dan desain yang luar biasa

  • @BretBucherrealtor
    @BretBucherrealtor 2 года назад +1

    I hit the Bell

  • @jaskong5093
    @jaskong5093 2 года назад +3

    Please do not amazed if TNI AL(INDONESIAN MARINES)Use this Tank for amphibious assault ☺ 💪👍

    • @VS-iw3xr
      @VS-iw3xr 2 месяца назад

      Thats BMP...this is for airborne troops

  • @ricardogunnz2
    @ricardogunnz2 Год назад +1

    Not a Bradley, but not too bad...

  • @katoy9976
    @katoy9976 8 месяцев назад

    Bundan sonra 😎

  • @dnxi5272
    @dnxi5272 Год назад +1

    US doesn't have something like this

  • @jeffreyprezalar220
    @jeffreyprezalar220 Год назад +3

    These vehicles need aps badly

    • @Galaxy-oy4nj
      @Galaxy-oy4nj 12 дней назад

      Yes, but APS programs are still kind of small-scale and wont protect you from rockets fired at below ~100m

  • @JeanLucCaptain
    @JeanLucCaptain Год назад

    i wonder what that big cut out in the rear hull is for? probably for the airdrop equipment though it seems like a huge space sacrifice so their would have to be a very good reason for it on a vehicle that had to shave as much weight as possible and where space is at an absolute prmium even more then other AFVs. also the fact most versions can be airlifted and not actually dropped is interesting. as far as i can tell the Russians are the only people who have an actually viable airdropped IFV (though this if more a fire support vehicle). the best the Germans ever made was the Wesel a tiny fire support vehicle little more then a self-propelled 20mm autocannon or tow launcher (and it had to chose one or the other). and the Americans gave us the terribly flawed M551 Sheridan that tried too hard to be a tank and was insanely complex while also having armour so thin as to be pointless. Its interesting when you think about it as the Hind is also unique in that it is effectively a Flying IFV.

    • @Galaxy-oy4nj
      @Galaxy-oy4nj 12 дней назад

      That cutout is infantry compartment, the layout of the vehicle is as such: Driver in the front and 2 infantry besides him, turret is occupied by commander and gunner, behind the turret can sit 3 more infantry.

  • @liliwinnt6
    @liliwinnt6 2 года назад

    how about making an btr that is longer and taller than the btr-mdm and based on the bmp-3 chassis

  • @ginoramirez4290
    @ginoramirez4290 Год назад

    tanque aerotransportado , bien

  • @joserivadeo7138
    @joserivadeo7138 2 года назад +1

    Sra, a cuánto cada uno ??

  • @ДенисС-п6щ
    @ДенисС-п6щ 11 месяцев назад

    Это великолепные машины, но к сожалению сама концепция ВДВ под вопросом, в связи с совершенством средств ПВО, в том числе переносных. Транспортный самолет просто не зайдет в место высадки десанта.
    Но если будет решен вопрос с прохождением ПВО и сбросом десанта - такие войска могут перерезать коммуникации, совершить диверсии, глубокие рейды и вообще доставить очень много неприятностей противнику.

  • @zemog1025
    @zemog1025 2 года назад +1

    where do you put the INFANTRY

    • @Otaku.Pilot-99
      @Otaku.Pilot-99 Год назад

      I have the same question, no clue.

    • @mbtenjoyer9487
      @mbtenjoyer9487 Год назад

      Behind the gun / auto loader

    • @Otaku.Pilot-99
      @Otaku.Pilot-99 Год назад +1

      @@mbtenjoyer9487 where are the doors to the compartment? Is te one on top just behind the turret?

    • @mbtenjoyer9487
      @mbtenjoyer9487 Год назад +1

      @@Otaku.Pilot-99 behind the turret it’s kinda like a hatch

    • @tragiet367
      @tragiet367 Год назад

      Xe này chỉ để yểm trợ lính dù thôi còn chở quân là btr bmd

  • @UncleQ57
    @UncleQ57 2 года назад +1

    На заставке и на кадрах с выставки в ролике - 4 без М.

  • @davidjames1063
    @davidjames1063 Год назад +5

    A few of these could give most Western tanks a bad day. Rapid fire 100mm would be devastating from sides or rear.

    • @andrew2353
      @andrew2353 Год назад +1

      The 100mm gun is low velocity and can't fire traditional anti-tank munitions, but it doubles as a launcher for ATGMs.

    • @Galaxy-oy4nj
      @Galaxy-oy4nj 12 дней назад

      Its a 30mm autocannon, still enough to shred older tanks like Leopard 2A4 or T-72B from the side, but against the top notch tanks like M1A2 SEPV3 it may struggle.

  • @gerhard8616
    @gerhard8616 Год назад

    Barang ini bagus buat airbone drop didaerah rawan papua yg gk bisa d akses jalur darat...

  • @BrimFreedom-c2m
    @BrimFreedom-c2m 2 месяца назад

    88258 Turner Locks

  • @blugaledoh2669
    @blugaledoh2669 Год назад

    It would be better to move the engine to the front.

    • @ilijaspasojevic7031
      @ilijaspasojevic7031 9 месяцев назад +1

      The Russians are increasingly making such vehicles, where the engine is in the front.. Seriously. They are now literally in war production. Factories work day and night, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. And they have dozens, if not hundreds of such factories. They try all the variants. And those that perform well in training and even in combat conditions in Ukraine will enter regular production..

  • @MitsukoValladores-r9i
    @MitsukoValladores-r9i 2 месяца назад

    Harris Forges

  • @bock1283
    @bock1283 2 года назад +1

    It doesn't it doesn't matter the capability of the vehicle if the crew isn't trained.

  • @Евгений-ф7р6и
    @Евгений-ф7р6и 6 месяцев назад

    На экспорт могут делать, а для себя нет?)

  • @JoseDownie-k4f
    @JoseDownie-k4f 2 месяца назад

    Kelton Falls

  • @AnthonyAdelaide-x2h
    @AnthonyAdelaide-x2h 2 месяца назад

    7398 Grant Port

  • @giorgi8272
    @giorgi8272 Год назад

    😉👍❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️🤙

  • @AustinClaire-c5c
    @AustinClaire-c5c Месяц назад

    Littel Road

  • @dk1064
    @dk1064 Год назад

    105mm Canon best

  • @BernalMaxwell-j8u
    @BernalMaxwell-j8u 2 месяца назад

    Orn Trafficway

  • @kgbdz9373
    @kgbdz9373 2 года назад +6

    🇩🇿❤️🇷🇺

  • @InclinationMerch
    @InclinationMerch 2 месяца назад

    Fahey Canyon

  • @MichaelStewart-k4z
    @MichaelStewart-k4z 2 месяца назад

    Becker Road

  • @mansurtxafapapaias3517
    @mansurtxafapapaias3517 2 года назад

    Proyección

  • @HuntingtonNick-y6v
    @HuntingtonNick-y6v 2 месяца назад

    Celestine Oval

  • @Homoprimatesapiens
    @Homoprimatesapiens 2 года назад +2

    According the video clip the 100mm gun got a firing rate of at least 300 rpm. Not really 10 rpm as stated by the narrator.

    • @twunt2000
      @twunt2000 2 года назад +8

      That's the 30mm firing at 300 rpm, not the 100mm main gun.

    • @Reginvalt
      @Reginvalt 2 года назад +6

      Last gen BMP/BMD have triplet armament: 100mm low ballistic rifled bore cannon/ATGM launcher, 30mm high ballistic cannon and 7,62 mm machine gun. 300 rpm or so must be 30mm cannon.

  • @abhishekdev258
    @abhishekdev258 Год назад

    Sprut tank??

    • @ilijaspasojevic7031
      @ilijaspasojevic7031 9 месяцев назад +1

      What about him? It has a T-90, 125 mm tank gun on a nearly similar, if not identical, chassis to the BMD-4. It also has amphibious capabilities, as well as the ability to drop everything with a crew by special parachutes directly onto the battlefield. It has weak armor, but makes up for it with its excellent maneuverability and high firepower. The Russians call it a "light tank", which it is to some extent.

    • @abhishekdev258
      @abhishekdev258 8 месяцев назад

      @@ilijaspasojevic7031 I am saying isn't both of them the same thing

    • @Galaxy-oy4nj
      @Galaxy-oy4nj 12 дней назад

      ​@@abhishekdev258no, Sprut is tank destroyer with 125mm gun, BMD4 is IFV with 100mm gun/launcher and 30mm autocannon. There is also 2S9 Nona 120mm self propelled mortar built on BMD hull.

  • @userboykey121
    @userboykey121 2 года назад

    😃

  • @Orcawhale1
    @Orcawhale1 2 месяца назад

    You guys should cancel the BMD series and just focus on making more BMP-3's.
    Airborne operations arn't going to be a thing for you guys in a long time.

  • @ethanmac639
    @ethanmac639 2 года назад +10

    why does Russia keep manufacturing old equipment instead of their new equipment designs??
    *>edit~//- I fully support Russia and Putin, VIVA Mother Russia🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺-//~*

    • @KrullNortherly
      @KrullNortherly 2 года назад +8

      Потому что Россия делает оружие для реальной и тяжёлой работы, а не для циркового шоу с клоунами.

    • @bugraburakates2548
      @bugraburakates2548 2 года назад

      That should be... We all see what happens to old cold war era systems in Ukraine.

    • @bartunthegreat2999
      @bartunthegreat2999 2 года назад +2

      This isn't old. Is different from older BMPs. It is made for air dropped units.

    • @inhcaominhpham9512
      @inhcaominhpham9512 2 года назад +1

      The equipment inside is more important. They are the latest

    • @Lyo_nel
      @Lyo_nel 2 года назад +2

      Vean los PZH 2000 motorizados Alemanes en Ucrania, quedaron inútiles por falta de repuesto, sufrieron "rápidos" desgaste y no soportaron duro "trabajo"

  • @marcelob3490
    @marcelob3490 Год назад +1

    🇷🇺💪💪💪

  • @kimjongun7768
    @kimjongun7768 2 года назад

    Armour should be improved

  • @olegsamar4324
    @olegsamar4324 Год назад

    How does this help you in Ukraine?

    • @spike5911
      @spike5911 Месяц назад

      It transports soldiers.

  • @renatogasperin9285
    @renatogasperin9285 Год назад

    Anti america