The Bradley isn't heavily armoured, its a light armoured vehicle, but it can be fitted with bolts to screw in extra protection, like ERA with the "B.U.S.K" or slat armor. That however comes at the loss of soem capabilities, like being able to cross rivers. Basically, the Russians opted to maintain amphibious capabilities, while the Americans opted for more protection, that's in great part due to their experiences with the War on Terror, where the biggest threat were from ambushes and they hadn't had the need for amphibious capabilities, so they ditched them and opted for the armor instead. Another issue is that the Bradley was beuit later and with a more modular design, which means it's got ample space for extra add-ons (i mean, just look at the turrets of the modern Bradleys for example), meanwhile, the BMPs 1 and 2, which are make the bulk of the Russian IFV fleet, were made from prior to that, which makes them less capable of these improvements. The BMP-3 and BMD-4 kind of adressed that, but they weren't nearly produced as much, specially because the Russians opted to restart the BMP-2 production instead due to cost. Also, the BMP-3 and BMD-4 run into problems of their own, starting by their layout, in which the infantry disembarks over the engine, which needs to be at the back to balance the 100mm+3mm guns they have, and also, they sacrifice too much of their armor in exchange for their amphibious capability, while having their 100mm munitions spread all over the hull, making the likelyhood of a catastrophic ammo cookout more likely.
@@СаняВинтарез I'm not American, i'm Brazilian.Also, thank you, i've always loved learning about machines, from military vehicles, to locomotives, planes, ships and industries, and games like World in Conflict, ArmA 3, S.T.A.L.K.E.R and others have made me develope a lot of interest for Warsaw Pact standard equipment.
@@eduardjacob8710Then I guess that Russian junk pile has the hauling capacity to handle my intelligence doesn't it? The first sign of low intelligence is attacking others intelligence.
Yes. More of these. On drone infested battlefields, this replaces light wheeled transports.
This is perfect for Arctic regions and when ice start to shifts and melts going from soild surface to water.
Or swampy regions.
Difference between this and BTR-80?
Its so cute
Make civilians version please I really like this car❤
Это академика вездеход?
I don’t understand why the Russians don’t have a heavy armoured personnel carrier like the Bradley
The Bradley isn't heavily armoured, its a light armoured vehicle, but it can be fitted with bolts to screw in extra protection, like ERA with the "B.U.S.K" or slat armor.
That however comes at the loss of soem capabilities, like being able to cross rivers.
Basically, the Russians opted to maintain amphibious capabilities, while the Americans opted for more protection, that's in great part due to their experiences with the War on Terror, where the biggest threat were from ambushes and they hadn't had the need for amphibious capabilities, so they ditched them and opted for the armor instead.
Another issue is that the Bradley was beuit later and with a more modular design, which means it's got ample space for extra add-ons (i mean, just look at the turrets of the modern Bradleys for example), meanwhile, the BMPs 1 and 2, which are make the bulk of the Russian IFV fleet, were made from prior to that, which makes them less capable of these improvements.
The BMP-3 and BMD-4 kind of adressed that, but they weren't nearly produced as much, specially because the Russians opted to restart the BMP-2 production instead due to cost.
Also, the BMP-3 and BMD-4 run into problems of their own, starting by their layout, in which the infantry disembarks over the engine, which needs to be at the back to balance the 100mm+3mm guns they have, and also, they sacrifice too much of their armor in exchange for their amphibious capability, while having their 100mm munitions spread all over the hull, making the likelyhood of a catastrophic ammo cookout more likely.
@@LoboalphaMASTER для американца вы сильно разбираетесь
@@СаняВинтарез I'm not American, i'm Brazilian.Also, thank you, i've always loved learning about machines, from military vehicles, to locomotives, planes, ships and industries, and games like World in Conflict, ArmA 3, S.T.A.L.K.E.R and others have made me develope a lot of interest for Warsaw Pact standard equipment.
Toujours l'excellence de cette Grande Nation. Vive la Russie😍👍
Pfff... c’est plutôt des produits DÉGUEULASSE 😂😂
5 tones 800 kg load.... 23 hp ... something is wrong there.. or this vehicle can only go downhill
Saudações do Brasil !
Keren
WANT
How fast is reverse? 😂
Stalin said no step back, so no need for reverse.
@pacivalmuller9333ah yes the all so wise advice from a man whose country collapsed
Отправьте Чувака в Израиль ...
♥️❤️♥️❤️♥️❤️♥️❤️
👍
“Open top protected armored hull…” this is not front line vehicle
Ah, another type of target available from Russia that no-one will want.
...🙄🤔 Russian Ripsaw !☺😀
No match for a $500 drone.
kedua😅
First view 😊
23HP? Joke or mistake?
106HP engine, 23HP per ton
Slava Rossiya 🇷🇺💪🪖😎
🇷🇺💗😎💪💯🙏🤲🇯🇴🇮🇶🇳🇬
My F150 has greater capacity.
Cheap aluminum vehicles
You,the western dog always spread propaganda.But your fucking U.S.A can't cope with this cheap equipment.shame.....shame
US Army M113 proudly proclaims that it is made of aluminium 😂😂😂
Indon 🤣
My Toyota Camry can haul more weight than that!😂😂😂
a sua inteligência não tem peso...😄
When did your Camry swim the last time? 😅
@@tristanschweiglRead my comment again. What am I commenting on? The weight hauling capacity, which is laughable at 800 kilo.
@@tristanschweiglIncredible that a joke sailed that far over your head. You must be a joy to hang out with.
@@eduardjacob8710Then I guess that Russian junk pile has the hauling capacity to handle my intelligence doesn't it? The first sign of low intelligence is attacking others intelligence.
Gor_Valeri 😊channel