Hey InspiTuts and community ❤️❤️❤️ We are so happy to be featured in such an amazing list and video! We’re already working on an update to bring even more features to the addon ❤️❤️❤️
@@Graphical_Gurujii well i dont even make 100$ a yr. How on earth am i supposed to buy them right? My parents would whop my @$$ if they knew i use their money to buy addons for softwares
Maya already have many built-in amazing Addons such as sky, muscle, etc., but the big difference is Blender Addons are not built-in, you have to BUY them one by one.
@@manda3dprojects966 I agree with you man but there is no clouds or stars or weather unless you make them by bifrost or something , blender gets a lot of addons every year while maya barely gets anything
Studio mostly have their own custom integrated addons that suit their needs. So Maya doesn’t bother. Blender is free, and the community makes tools accessible for the mass.
@@PrinceBrosnan I wouldn't. I'd recommend a camera and going outside for that. You're asking about rendering 432,000 frames of footage? 300 minutes of video is 5 hours worth of video. Average that at each frame taking 5 minutes to render and you're talking 1500 days of nonstop rendering. It's cheaper and quicker to just buy a camera and take videos of the sky.
Guys, don't forget the Blender Market Sale! Save %25 off Thousands of Products!
bit.ly/3IqQIJU
Thank you for supporting channel in advance 🙏😉
hi bro bought this starlight addon but my stars are not showing, what should i do?
Who did the very first shot??? (At 0:01) Pls i have to know, it looks beautiful!
Hey InspiTuts and community ❤️❤️❤️ We are so happy to be featured in such an amazing list and video! We’re already working on an update to bring even more features to the addon ❤️❤️❤️
Your addons are awesome, keep it up!
True Skies kicks butt!
I wish blender had a system like Ultra Dynamic Sky in unreal engine 😔
But UDS is so costly
@@Graphical_Gurujii not the cracked version that i use😏😏😏
@@sk.mahdeemahbubsamy2857 😐now that's fine then, because i to uses most of the add ons cracked
@@Graphical_Gurujii well i dont even make 100$ a yr. How on earth am i supposed to buy them right?
My parents would whop my @$$ if they knew i use their money to buy addons for softwares
I saw ppl shitting on physical starlight so I held off its immediately nice looking and easy
The curse of 3D Max has been on me for over 10 years and I have so little understanding of it I think I'll switch over to Blender before I die
Thanks. This list led me to a free addon called Sky-Lab.
oh? is it any good?
@@sammysquid3702
It's ok from what I've played with so far. Haven't really dug into it thoroughly yet, as I'm mainly trying to learn modeling still.
@@SewerTapes fair enough, thanks though
Great Video!
Who did the very first shot??? Pls i have to know, it looks beautiful!
so cool
This is very useful, thanx man! Just a reminder etc.. is pronounced etcetera without the x 😉
Why doesn't Maya have such Addons
Maya already have many built-in amazing Addons such as sky, muscle, etc., but the big difference is Blender Addons are not built-in, you have to BUY them one by one.
@@manda3dprojects966 I agree with you man but there is no clouds or stars or weather unless you make them by bifrost or something , blender gets a lot of addons every year while maya barely gets anything
Because maya comes with all these out of the box? What I’m being told.
I hope maya gets anything it feels like abandoned software
Studio mostly have their own custom integrated addons that suit their needs. So Maya doesn’t bother.
Blender is free, and the community makes tools accessible for the mass.
they all look good but which ones are free
🤝
is there a full tutorial on PAS?
but its not optimized
you can't really optimize clouds/fog. If you really can't afford the plus render times, just use cutouts.
Blender is the bottleneck for any volume tool. Not "lack of optimsation in the addon"
@@True-VFX Excuse me, but what program would you recommend for generating and rendering 300 videos (one minute each) with singly moving clouds?
@@PrinceBrosnan I wouldn't. I'd recommend a camera and going outside for that. You're asking about rendering 432,000 frames of footage? 300 minutes of video is 5 hours worth of video. Average that at each frame taking 5 minutes to render and you're talking 1500 days of nonstop rendering. It's cheaper and quicker to just buy a camera and take videos of the sky.
@@True-VFX Thank you, you are very fast. I think you are right.
Are these free or paid ?
paid
This is paid... not good