Since last week I have started watching these episodes with Hamza Ali Abbasi and was very seriously involved in it. Day by day my eimaan is growing strong and I am so thankful to Allah for making me a muslim. I am also amazed at the knowledge u both possess and can well recall it at the right time and moment.
Aik aankh ko hee lele lain kitne different forms main hai... human eye, bird eye, fish eye animal eye.... so on amazing Subhana Allah... just look into nature every where is the only Allah Tala....
@@mohammadkhan-ms9qd what is your problem ? Why are you leaving random comments everywhere? If you want to discuss your questions then contact me on my Facebook messenger. Otherwise if you keep placing random comments, then I will put a block on your account
When i shared this discussion with an atheist who had read about darwin, dawkins and he has so much inspired by the Buddha's teachings. He bashing out on hamza ali abbasi that he is just an actor. But after listened to him you probably found him as an intellectual and have a vast knowledge. "Waqt krta hai parwarish barson Haadsaa ek dum nahi hota" Azeem bhai i salute your efforts 💕💕
خوبصورت، زبردست، بہترین ۔۔۔۔۔ آپ بھائیوں سے اتفاق کرتے ہوئے عرض کیا ہے ۔قرآن کا موضوع اور مقصد سائنس ہر گز نہیں لیکن قرآن کے نسب ، توازن ، ترتیب، الفاظ اور جمعلوں کا چناو اور پھر کہی گئ بامعنی با ربط بات، واقعات، نصیحت ہر دور میں معجزات سے کم نہیں۔ دور جدید کیوں کہ سائنس کا دور ہے تو قرآن اور سائنس کا تعلق قائم کرنا دلچسپ اور قابل غور ہے۔ اس کو مقصد اور دلیل کے طور پر پیش کرنا میرے نزدیک ٹھیک نہیں لیکن دلچسپی کے لئے رجوع کرنے میں ہرج بھی نہیں۔ باقی آپ بھائی بہترین کام کر رہے ہیں اللہ پاک قبول کرے آپ کی کاوشوں کو۔
میں اور حمزہ دونوں قران کا مقصد یا موضوع سائنس کو نہیں سمجھتے۔ البتہ اپنا اصل موضوع بیان کرتے ہوئے ضمنی طور پر کچھ سائنسی حقیقتوں کا ذکر بھی ہوجاتا ہے۔ یہ اسی کی جانب اشارہ ہے
Wohee same insaan hai jab panee main jata hai to us kee saans band aur wohee machlee hai k zameen k ooper aae to is kee saans band... aur ankh aik jaisee hai... Subhana Allah....
@@AzeemUrRehman سر مجھے صرف اس سوال کا جواب دےدیں کہ جو مذہبی تھیوریز ہیں وہ تو پھر بھی غلط ثابت ہوجاتی ہیں ۔مطلب آدم کی تھیوری اور چھ ہزار سال پہلے انسان کی تخلیق ۔تو پھر کیا اب تک کہ اربوں لوگ غلط بات کومانتے آئے ہیں کیونکہ کسی خدا نے کبھی امریکن لوگوں کے بارے نہیں بتایا تھا کہ مَیں نے وہاں بھی انسان بنائے ۔ مَیں ایک ملحد ہوں اور آپ میرے کچھ سوالوں کے جواب دینے کی زحمت کریں گے تو مَیں شاید حق کو پا لوں۔ اگر آپ کا جواب آیا تو اپنے سوال آپ کو پوسٹ کردوں گا
9:23 Allah ki har cheez bnayii gayii perfect hai. Ab insaan ki soch k mutabik nhi to aesa nhi hai k us cheez ko aesa nhi wesa hona chahiye tha. Btw great conversation. Azeem bhai kya baat kahi hai k hum pixels k bary me janty hein Lenin actual picture to sir Allah hi janta hai.
Mashallah.... Azeem bhai Literally iam enjoying this interview more than any netflix show....... The information you are delivering through your videos..... Ramarkable HUGEEE RESPECT 😍❤️
Design argument can never work because for an object to be designed we must first know whether that thing was intentional if so then what was the intention of the designer, if someone wanted to design a car but made the best chair instead we would not say this was well designed, so since we cannot know the universe was made intentionally nor the intention of the creator than we can't say it is well designed. Just because something serves some purpose does not necessitate that it was designed for that purpose.
I really liked your point of view. It made me think about the reason. Though the comparison given here is not making sense to me. You talked about a person making something but it turned out to be something else. It could be due to many reasons, like that person was not capable enough, or he does not have the knowledge, or he has a change of heart, or he was not skillful. That makes this person a designer but not the best designer. When we talk about the Designer who is all knowing and is not bounded by time.
What a informative series is this. I'm so thankful of God that created the persons like both of you, we fulfill with passion to take knowledge in this field, this discussion encouraged me so much, jazakAllah.
MashaAllah Your knowledge is so broad brother azeem, please do a seperate programme on evolution and can you also include brother Hamza Abbassi and Hamza Tzoris alongside brother saboor
Excellent episode As usual Sir if u do next episode with hamza then plz ask him about difference between Christianity & islam. And ask him does christanity make sense.
Mazhabi kitabon kay mutabiq insan ki history 15000 sal tak ho sakti h jab kay science kay mutabiq insan ki timeline millions of years per muheet h ap dono ko kese reconcile karen gay
Ma Shaa Allah , Hamza Ali Abbasi ummeed se zyada malumat rakhte hain , warna mujhe lagta tha Showbiz walo ko itna padhne wagaira ka time nahi milta honga.
I think the ultimate question is as always, where do these pattern/laws come from. I think the most honest answer would be "we do not know", as I already texted you earlier , there are many many scientific possibilties for origin questions. I think we are centuries away from answering these questions. We can deduce something philosophically but then only empiricism will decide whether It is true or not. And regarding how order can be acheived without any conscious intervention, here is an example : take 5 marbles and a trampoline with a Big marble in middle ( this experiment is often done while teaching GR), then throw the marbles randomly over the trampoline, initially all the marbles will travel on random paths but after some collisions they will all end up moving in clockwise or anticlockaise direction ( u can try this).Now, imagine a person has no knowledge of how the marbles were thrown ,when he sees all of them moving in a harmonious way , he will find it difficult to conclude that initially these marbles were randomly thrown, but you see, he would be wrong.
Let's say there are many reasons to patterns, then the reasons to those reasons, then ultimately one reason behind every reason, then what is behind that reason. The uncaused first cause. We can believe whatever we want to believe about that uncaused first cause. I choose to call it God.
@@doctormuhammadawaisrabbani1088 one can call it anything but just giving a name to something is useless.it is like saying "the reason that rain falls from the sky is because "X" causes it to fall. It is a tautology
@@guitarika8477 God is a biased I admit. Let's call it a being that is the uncaused first cause. So if a see the all the number of causes of the rain and reach the last cause which is cause of all the other causes, I can logically deduce that the being is behind it.
@@doctormuhammadawaisrabbani1088 You don't deduce it logically, you figure it out empirically, by really looking at cloud formation and stuff. One can come up with logically consistent theories about the world but the right ones can only be picked by emprical methods. Logical consistency and logical plausibility is the necessary condition but not the sufficient condition for the right description of the world.
@@guitarika8477 true ha bro the way I see it, the reasons behind everything can be either be infinite or finite. It can't be infinite because if you walked from point A to point B with infinite distance in between you will never reach point B, the distance has to be finite. Then finite reasons ma it can't be 2 or 3 or 10 13 as what is behind that. ultimately we just reach one cause behind every cause. We can choose to call it whatever we like. Thats how I see it.
اسلام علیکم و رحمتہ ہمزہ بھائی آپ کو بہت مبارک ہو اللہ پاک کا آپ کی طرف نظر رحمت کرنا آپ سے ایک اور گزارش ہے کہ آپ غامدی صاحب کے پیروکار ہیں تو کہنا یہ ہے کہ اللہ پاک سے آپنی ھدایت کے لیے ابھی بھی دعا کرتے رہیں اور باقی فرقوں پر بھی اسی طرح ریسرچ کرتے رہیں جیسا آپ نے خالق حقیقی سے واقفیت حاصل کی اس طرح اللہ پاک آپ پر فرقوں کی بھی حقیقت واضح کرے اور صحیح راہ کا انتخاب نصیب فرمائے آمین ثم آمین
Agar ye proof ho jaye ki koi energy hai jisne ye kaynat, insan etc.....sab kuchh bnaya hai... Tab bhi ye kaise proof hoga ki woh musalmano ka Allah hai woh toh isaii ka God, hinduo ka bhagwan bhi ho skta hai
Jnab ye dawa kisne Kiya ki wo musalmano Ka Allah h sirf ? Allah to sbka h pr Sahi rasta kya h ye smjhne ki zroorat h aap bhe knowledge hasil kre or aise hi video bnaye
Sir smj ni aya Kuch plz zara clear krde ke hamza sir ne support kia h ya unsupport kia h evolution ko...sir video ko 2 times dekha pr conclusion ka ni pata chala..sir plz thora sa bataday asaani hojay gi smjnay me.... Jazak'Allah
Jb Qur'an Pak me btadiya ki SB Adam or hawwa ki aulad h TB phir darvin ki bkvas me kiu phse h kya Allah k kalam pr yaqeen nhi ye swal uthta or ye koi aisa masla nhi h seedhi si baat zyada cuthujjati se insan bahek jata h
you are bringing the exact thoughts of atheists in front of us is an amazing and unique job. Appreciable task brother, keep educating us regarding atheism vs Islam.
Waiting for Saboor Bhai and your discussion... I met him once and inshAllah he will be next Ahmed deedat and zakir naik for athiesm. I m too much Impressed by Saboor Bhai work.
Sir ask him k wo creater islam wala creater ha ye proof krien...aur islam k qwneen ya kuch asay mojzay hien ya kuch asi batien hien hdeeso main aur quran main jesay londiyon wali bat ha ....is sab pr bat krien hmza sa
@@AzeemUrRehman sir tabri aur ishaq main jo kuch likha ha us k baray kya khyal ha ? Wo to sab sa old books hien ? Asal islam to i think whi ha ye to bad main modratw kiya gya ha islam ko ? Kya khyal ha ks wjha sa ap tabri aur ishaq ki lekhi baton ko glt kehtay hien ? Aur ap ko i think pta ho ga k kya kya likh ha un main mujhay btanay ki zroorat ni
@@AzeemUrRehman aur boht sari hdesien contridect krti apis main aur boht sari hdeesien shi sand honay k bawajood glt hien un kay bara kya khyal ha ? Ap aj quran main itni science gusatay hien jesay big bang aur sab lakin us wqt ki hdeesien jo tashree krti hien un sa to lagta ha k bat bilkul muhtleef ha asal main to us wqt k logo ko science ka kuch pta he ni tha ? Aur boht sari batien jo quran main contridect krti un kay baray kya khien ga ?
Sir ap kehtay k Allah na frew will d hoi ha to phir Allah quran main kehta ha k mainay boht c qoumo ko tbah kiya tum sa pehlay aur boht logo pr azab bejhay ? Ye kesi free will ha ? Aur ap k nbi na boht sari ryasto ko hat likhay k ayk Allah ki ibadat kro wrna jhang kro ? Aur ik trf ap kehtay k hisab qyamat ko hona ha ? Dosri trf ap kehtay k qabir main b azab milay ga ? Agr hisab qyamat ko hona ha to phir azab qaber main ks wjha sa da rhay hien ? Aur Phir Quran main Allah kehta k lohay mehfooz pr likha ja chuka ha sb agr likha ja chuka ha to phir jo koi kafir ha us main us ka kya qasoor ha ? Kafir b to Allah he paida kr rha ha naw ? To muslmano k ilwa kya baqi sab dozah main jien ga ? Allah kehta ha quran main ye kafir jetnay mrzi achay kam kr la in k amal rkh ki trah ura da jien ga ? Ye kesa logic ha agr hum b hindu k gr paida hotay to kafir hotay ? To hr lihaz sa sir koi wjha he ni ha k hum man lien k ye khuda whi khuda ha js na univrse bnai
Azeem bhai can you make a video on how to deal with doubts... even though after a struggle of three years I have found the answers I was looking for but still I am unable to keep myself firm on faith.
At 18:00 humza made a flawed comparison god of the gaps with atheism of the gaps, without recognising it. In the god of the gaps argument, the last step is 'hence god' which is critical in making this argument fallacious, no such thing in atheism of the gaps (if there even is such a thing), where humza himself says they end the argument at 'we dont know'.
Hamza is right because anything metaphysical is out of the domain of science still atheist hold onto science of the gaps and even if science explain a physical phenomena which shows remarkable evidence of intelligence involved still they rather then picking the best inference hold onto atheism of the gap which is inconsistency ..
@@islamicmessage2419 i dont think you understand the concept of god of the gaps. Let me explain: long ago humans didn't understand lightning. There was a gap in knowledge. Humans created a god of lightning, thor or zeus, to explain this phenomenon. Once scientific knowledge explained how lightning occurs, this god concept fizzled out. Science stops at 'this is all we understand about it, it cant be explained further at the moment.' The god of the gaps argument says 'science can't explain it further, hence it must be a supernatural being doing it'. Humans have equated god with anything they didn't understand like volcanos, tsunamis, death, stars, meteors, disease. I hope this makes the argument clear. Can you give an example of atheism of the gaps the or science of the gaps.
@@dhaagajee00 Consciousness is metaphysical and we can't have physical explanation for something metaphysical.. And there is plenty of scientific literature on hard problem of Consciousness.. Now, atheist should acknowledge that consiousness is metaphysical and only metaphysical explanation is possible which is outside from scientific realm But they don't acknowledge that either yet many Atheist I have had dialogue with at the end denied consiousness and said consiousness is an illusion.. Same is the case for free will.. Now, This is atheism of the gap that at least acknowledge that something is irreducible to physical and its metaphysical.. And secondly, saying science will find an answer of consiousness is science of the gaps as we know consiousness is metaphysical in nature.. For eg If you see yellow colour first time only you know this first person subjective conscious experience.. No one else and not even neurons in your brian can't tell us that experience.... First person subjective conscious experience is impossible under scientific physical realm..
@@islamicmessage2419 you again made the god of the gaps argument saying that since consciousness has not been explained and replicated scientifically, it must be metaphysical. Science says, like you just wrote, we will find a scientific explanation for consciousness, which means it makes no claims as yet. To appeal to the metaphysical, you need to first demonstrate that a meta physical realm exists. About yellow, it's a wavelength and can be reliably measured to fit the definition of the term yellow, whether or not someone subjectively claims and perceives it differently.
@@dhaagajee00 Bro, consiousness is metaphysical because we can't see it nor empirically test it.. Anything metaphysical can't be demonstrated in material world.. And I said that they'd should acknowledge that it's metaphysical in nature rather then waiting that we somehow see it.. Secondly bro when you see yellow colour.. I am not talking about yellow colour can be measured or not.. My point was that your subjective consious experience when you see yellow can it be reducible to neurons firing in your brain... Obviously not... If you are depressed only you know the subjective conscious experience of depression.. And physiologist have given a word depression a definition but what it feels to be depressed can only be known by the person who experience it.. And the hard problem of Consciousness is unsolvable because it is out of the realm of naturalism and I can quote academics of the field if you don't want to believe.. So, all I am saying is that acknowledge that consiousness is metaphysical in nature and only meta narrative is possible in this case
Quraan mei jo bataya gya k kuch Sar-kash logon ko Bandar waghera bana dya tha,,, Darwin bhai ne un Banderoon k Genes tou check nhi ker lyay thay kaheen jo wo kehty hein k Insan or Bander aik jese hein?
You will rarely find a Japanese, Chinese, American or British talking about things out of their field of knowledge...but every pakistani is a doctor, Islamic scholar, scientist, biologist you name it and they have it...and the funny thing is people listen to them... No disrespect
Ab kya kaha jaye aap ki comment pe Bhai aise hi baat karke yaha tak puhche western countries. And ha quoting Neil degrase Tyson “The goal here is not to make everybody a scientist. … What matters is whether they’re scientifically literate and maintain that literacy and that curiosity throughout their lives.”
You know what more funny is ? that the people like you have zero idea about other country people but they falsely talk on their behalf. I travelled around the world, reside in Britain and work daily with US and Japan at my job. Let me tell you, they all talks about these topics but you hardly find anybody like you to spread wrong info.
@@AzeemUrRehman I know what i said...other nations do talk about such things but they know difference between learning and becoming a student before start teaching. What we Pakistanis, especially in this video, are doing is quoting different people and marvelling on things without even understanding and having conclusive knowledge...one of the interesting things I have noticed is humans don't change... In old times there were people who used to talk about stupid things with little knowledge..."payan fla shy bri heavy jay...1 time chy 10 bndya no mardi ay" people of same mentality have joined youtube and learned modern things so they can discuss and pose themselves as very intelligent. I am just trying to say k bhai jis filed k ho usi mein bat kro aur Islam ko seekh to lo phly...mn otha k ikhtlaf krny chl prty hein...i am not singling you out but talking about the mentlity of our nation...i also include myself in it
Ma na ap ki phali video sari daki ha its amazing or ya wali video bi nice beshak AP ki batay very nice good and Muslman muslman ka bahi ha aik hi jism ham sab ban ka dekhaye bilkul sach ha ham log kyu aik dusaray sa nafrat Kertay ha kyu ?or baki logo I mean phalay logo na boht mahnat ki ha yaar ham log bas dunya ka peashay lagay ha kyu Allah ki traf koy mind hi nahi ha jis agay jawab dena ha very very nice video ❤
Darwin presented unguided spontaneity that precludes the Almighty. Design argument especially irreducible complexity cannot be refuted. But the core human characteristic, the faculty of Language cannot be explained ever by Darwinism or Neo-Darwinism. All animals communicate: through speech and/or chemicals, such as ants. But only humans have language: grammar and vocabulary. To "evolve" language, human offspring is born without the pre-programming that all the other species' offspring's are endowed with, so that human mothers can deliver babies, still have narrow pelvises and remain bipedal. But this puts human baby in grave danger that can only be mitigated by the parental unit spending years of time in child rearing. Evolution CAN NEVER explain that.
If there is no use of a body part, like they say about the appendix, it is because till now we haven't been able to find its use. Doesn't mean there is none. It is possible that we find its use in the future.
@@AzeemUrRehman There is one other thing i wanted to point out. You talked about the iphone not being able to make itself. The atheist has a good comeback to this. Which is that inorganic things and organic things behave differently. Iphone is made of inorganic things while a cell is an organic creature so it can grow. Please keep this in mind and don't use this argument again.
सत्य को विचार से नहीं समझा जा सकता, केवल मौन और मौन के बाद जो आता है उसे शब्दों से नहीं कहा जा सकता, केवल मौन, Truth cannot be understood by thought, only silence and silence cannot be said by words, only silence, (sjk)
I criticised Ghamidi sahab too. 😊 Subboor is an open minded unbiased researcher, he may have his conclusions which are different from Ghamidi school of thought
Since last week I have started watching these episodes with Hamza Ali Abbasi and was very seriously involved in it. Day by day my eimaan is growing strong and I am so thankful to Allah for making me a muslim. I am also amazed at the knowledge u both possess and can well recall it at the right time and moment.
Aik aankh ko hee lele lain kitne different forms main hai... human eye, bird eye, fish eye animal eye.... so on amazing Subhana Allah... just look into nature every where is the only Allah Tala....
Alhamdullilah
I am amazed to know him as an intellectual person. Such a gem he is!
الحمدللہ
If he is gem.
What is Allah.
@@mohammadkhan-ms9qd what is your problem ? Why are you leaving random comments everywhere? If you want to discuss your questions then contact me on my Facebook messenger. Otherwise if you keep placing random comments, then I will put a block on your account
@@mohammadkhan-ms9qd Indeed Allah is his creator
@@shoaibsyed1936 yes Allah is the creator of this gem 💎 and all others.
When i shared this discussion with an atheist who had read about darwin, dawkins and he has so much inspired by the Buddha's teachings.
He bashing out on hamza ali abbasi that he is just an actor.
But after listened to him you probably found him as an intellectual and have a vast knowledge.
"Waqt krta hai parwarish barson
Haadsaa ek dum nahi hota"
Azeem bhai i salute your efforts 💕💕
ہدایت صرف اللہ کے ہاتھ میں ہے، ہمارا کام کسی سے منوانا نہیں بلکہ پیغام پہنچانا ہے
خوبصورت، زبردست، بہترین ۔۔۔۔۔
آپ بھائیوں سے اتفاق کرتے ہوئے عرض کیا ہے ۔قرآن کا موضوع اور مقصد سائنس ہر گز نہیں لیکن قرآن کے نسب ، توازن ، ترتیب، الفاظ اور جمعلوں کا چناو اور پھر کہی گئ بامعنی با ربط بات، واقعات، نصیحت ہر دور میں معجزات سے کم نہیں۔ دور جدید کیوں کہ سائنس کا دور ہے تو قرآن اور سائنس کا تعلق قائم کرنا دلچسپ اور قابل غور ہے۔
اس کو مقصد اور دلیل کے طور پر پیش کرنا میرے نزدیک ٹھیک نہیں لیکن دلچسپی کے لئے رجوع کرنے میں ہرج بھی نہیں۔
باقی آپ بھائی بہترین کام کر رہے ہیں اللہ پاک قبول کرے آپ کی کاوشوں کو۔
میں اور حمزہ دونوں قران کا مقصد یا موضوع سائنس کو نہیں سمجھتے۔ البتہ اپنا اصل موضوع بیان کرتے ہوئے ضمنی طور پر کچھ سائنسی حقیقتوں کا ذکر بھی ہوجاتا ہے۔ یہ اسی کی جانب اشارہ ہے
Subhan Allah❤
Alhamdullilah
Great work Azeem bhae..Amazed to know Mr. Abbasi also has great knowledge.
He is a gem 💎 Alhamdullilah
Ape Dr Zakir Naik Interview Kabe La Raha Hai
Very good discussion 👍
Thanks for sharing your knowledge
Wohee same insaan hai jab panee main jata hai to us kee saans band aur wohee machlee hai k zameen k ooper aae to is kee saans band... aur ankh aik jaisee hai... Subhana Allah....
These uploads literally make dopamine rush inside my head. As usual, very informative session.
Haha love the comment, let me pin it
@@AzeemUrRehman Alright. I hope Hamza bhai is gonna see it. I am a big fan of him. 😃
@@AzeemUrRehman Ape Dr Zakir Naik Interview Kabe La Raha Hai
@@KAMRAN23024 HI IS A KID
@@AzeemUrRehman سر مجھے صرف اس سوال کا جواب دےدیں کہ جو مذہبی تھیوریز ہیں وہ تو پھر بھی غلط ثابت ہوجاتی ہیں ۔مطلب آدم کی تھیوری اور چھ ہزار سال پہلے انسان کی تخلیق ۔تو پھر کیا اب تک کہ اربوں لوگ غلط بات کومانتے آئے ہیں کیونکہ کسی خدا نے کبھی امریکن لوگوں کے بارے نہیں بتایا تھا کہ مَیں نے وہاں بھی انسان بنائے ۔ مَیں ایک ملحد ہوں اور آپ میرے کچھ سوالوں کے جواب دینے کی زحمت کریں گے تو مَیں شاید حق کو پا لوں۔
اگر آپ کا جواب آیا تو اپنے سوال آپ کو پوسٹ کردوں گا
9:23 Allah ki har cheez bnayii gayii perfect hai. Ab insaan ki soch k mutabik nhi to aesa nhi hai k us cheez ko aesa nhi wesa hona chahiye tha. Btw great conversation.
Azeem bhai kya baat kahi hai k hum pixels k bary me janty hein Lenin actual picture to sir Allah hi janta hai.
💚❤💝
hamza bhai kamaal hai ..bahut behtreen point mila hai mujhe...aur azeem bhai ke to kiya kehne sawaal bhi kamaal ka kiya hai ..
الحمدللہ
Good conversation. Learnt alot
الحمدللہ
ماشااللہ۔ اللہ پاک آپ دونوں کو دنیا اور آخرت میں اپنی رحمتوں سے نوازیں۔ آمین
آمین
Watched the epi👍 Love and prayers for both of you.. Hamza is a gem in a person.. He is my inspiration.. ♥️
He indeed is Alhamdullilah
We need More Muslims Like U And Hamza Bhai. Its The Need of an Hour
JazakAllah al khair for your kind words
@@AzeemUrRehman Can I Have Ur Contact Number?
A little correction for Abbasi- 3.5 billion years isn't "nothing" on timescale. It's almost 25% time of universe's age.
Great knowledge
Thanks for your input
Yar Azeem bhai kuch questions hain mere bht Tang karte hain mujhe, kya yhi poch lu
Really impressed azeem bahi.
It just make me happy when i see you have uploaded another part of this series with Hamza ali abbasi bahi
Alhamdullilah
Two legends are on one screen......
students we are
Plz watch sheikh omar Baloch
@@AzeemUrRehman Ape Dr Zakir Naik Interview Kabe La Raha Hai
Masha Allah Azeem Bhai bohat Naik kaam karahy hn app Allah Pak apko iska ajar ata kary ameen
Bhai facebook py msg kiye hen question kiye hen please reply azeem bhai
Replied
Mashallah.... Azeem bhai Literally iam enjoying this interview more than any netflix show....... The information you are delivering through your videos..... Ramarkable HUGEEE RESPECT 😍❤️
Alhamdullilah
Just superb arguments by mr hamza ali abbasi .
الحمدللہ
@@AzeemUrRehman Ape Dr Zakir Naik Interview Kabe La Raha Hai
bhai jan soul ka bara science or Islam kia khta iska upar discuss karen
Azeem bhai I watched all the episodes and I love it! Very Informative videos! Looking for more interviews and more videos like that Boht boht shurkiya
InshAllah and thank you for your kind words
MashAllah very awesome. Intellectual talk, u made us think in much depth which is required from us from Allah.
Alhamdullilah
Design argument can never work because for an object to be designed we must first know whether that thing was intentional if so then what was the intention of the designer, if someone wanted to design a car but made the best chair instead we would not say this was well designed, so since we cannot know the universe was made intentionally nor the intention of the creator than we can't say it is well designed. Just because something serves some purpose does not necessitate that it was designed for that purpose.
I really liked your point of view. It made me think about the reason. Though the comparison given here is not making sense to me. You talked about a person making something but it turned out to be something else. It could be due to many reasons, like that person was not capable enough, or he does not have the knowledge, or he has a change of heart, or he was not skillful. That makes this person a designer but not the best designer. When we talk about the Designer who is all knowing and is not bounded by time.
جزاک اللہ خیرا کثیرا
What a informative series is this. I'm so thankful of God that created the persons like both of you, we fulfill with passion to take knowledge in this field, this discussion encouraged me so much, jazakAllah.
وایاک
I will be curious about your next veidio
Tomorrow inshAllah
@@AzeemUrRehman Ape Dr Zakir Naik Interview Kabe La Raha Hai
عظیم بھائی کیا آپ کی ویڈیوز لگا سکتا ہوں؟ اپنے چینل پر کچھ ایڈیٹ کر کےلگاؤں گا یعنی ملحد کا سوال اور ساتھ جواب
اوکے 👍
@@AzeemUrRehman Ape Dr Zakir Naik Interview Kabe La Raha Hai
This one was really informative 👍. Brother Azeem this was way simpler Urdu and easy to understand. Jazakallah
وایاک الحمدللہ
Thanks brother
Voice pr dhiyaan dein... Hamza ki voice mai glich aa raha hai
Love u both
❤❤❤
Great video
Alhamdullilah
Allah Tala aap dono k efforts , struggle anf wisdom ko Qabool fatmaey... Sada khush aur abad raho dono jahanon main Ameen
Ameen
AOA.
I really appreciate your efforts .
MashaAllah Your knowledge is so broad brother azeem, please do a seperate programme on evolution and can you also include brother Hamza Abbassi and Hamza Tzoris alongside brother saboor
I will do it with Subboor soon
@@AzeemUrRehman OK, thank you very much
Great work Azeem bhai
الحمدللہ
Wah !! Greatly explained by Hamza Ali Abbasi.. 👏
Shukria for these videos , Azeem brothr !!
جزاک اللہ الخیر
Excellent episode As usual
Sir if u do next episode with hamza then plz ask him about difference between Christianity & islam. And ask him does christanity make sense.
😊👍
Design argument is weak but not a failure. Design argument is for common people
Well done Hamza and Azeem.May Allah bless you.
JazakAllah al khair
Very thought-provoking conversation
Alhamdullilah
Achee episode thee
Alhamdullilah
Great work
تشکر
Very informative
Alhamdullilah
Masha Allah ♥️
Great Discussion Azeem and Hamaza love you and keep going...Masha Allah
Alhamdullilah
Mazhabi kitabon kay mutabiq insan ki history 15000 sal tak ho sakti h jab kay science kay mutabiq insan ki timeline millions of years per muheet h ap dono ko kese reconcile karen gay
Nope. Not rite
Wo Bible ki kahani hai 6k yrs wali quran ki nahi
Ma Shaa Allah , Hamza Ali Abbasi ummeed se zyada malumat rakhte hain , warna mujhe lagta tha Showbiz walo ko itna padhne wagaira ka time nahi milta honga.
یہی غلط فہمی بہت سو کو ہوتی ہے کہ دین کا علم صرف ٹوپی ڈاڑھی والے کو ہوتا ہے
@@AzeemUrRehman Ape Dr Zakir Naik Interview Kabe La Raha Hai
I think the ultimate question is as always, where do these pattern/laws come from. I think the most honest answer would be "we do not know", as I already texted you earlier , there are many many scientific possibilties for origin questions. I think we are centuries away from answering these questions. We can deduce something philosophically but then only empiricism will decide whether It is true or not. And regarding how order can be acheived without any conscious intervention, here is an example : take 5 marbles and a trampoline with a Big marble in middle ( this experiment is often done while teaching GR), then throw the marbles randomly over the trampoline, initially all the marbles will travel on random paths but after some collisions they will all end up moving in clockwise or anticlockaise direction ( u can try this).Now, imagine a person has no knowledge of how the marbles were thrown ,when he sees all of them moving in a harmonious way , he will find it difficult to conclude that initially these marbles were randomly thrown, but you see, he would be wrong.
Let's say there are many reasons to patterns, then the reasons to those reasons, then ultimately one reason behind every reason, then what is behind that reason. The uncaused first cause. We can believe whatever we want to believe about that uncaused first cause. I choose to call it God.
@@doctormuhammadawaisrabbani1088 one can call it anything but just giving a name to something is useless.it is like saying "the reason that rain falls from the sky is because "X" causes it to fall. It is a tautology
@@guitarika8477 God is a biased I admit. Let's call it a being that is the uncaused first cause. So if a see the all the number of causes of the rain and reach the last cause which is cause of all the other causes, I can logically deduce that the being is behind it.
@@doctormuhammadawaisrabbani1088 You don't deduce it logically, you figure it out empirically, by really looking at cloud formation and stuff. One can come up with logically consistent theories about the world but the right ones can only be picked by emprical methods. Logical consistency and logical plausibility is the necessary condition but not the sufficient condition for the right description of the world.
@@guitarika8477 true ha bro the way I see it, the reasons behind everything can be either be infinite or finite. It can't be infinite because if you walked from point A to point B with infinite distance in between you will never reach point B, the distance has to be finite. Then finite reasons ma it can't be 2 or 3 or 10 13 as what is behind that. ultimately we just reach one cause behind every cause. We can choose to call it whatever we like. Thats how I see it.
اسلام علیکم و رحمتہ ہمزہ بھائی آپ کو بہت مبارک ہو اللہ پاک کا آپ کی طرف نظر رحمت کرنا آپ سے ایک اور گزارش ہے کہ آپ غامدی صاحب کے پیروکار ہیں تو کہنا یہ ہے کہ اللہ پاک سے آپنی ھدایت کے لیے ابھی بھی دعا کرتے رہیں اور باقی فرقوں پر بھی اسی طرح ریسرچ کرتے رہیں جیسا آپ نے خالق حقیقی سے واقفیت حاصل کی اس طرح اللہ پاک آپ پر فرقوں کی بھی حقیقت واضح کرے اور صحیح راہ کا انتخاب نصیب فرمائے آمین ثم آمین
Good Hamza Bhai...
consistently following these episodes. love you both
❤💖💝
Kamal video
💝
Ape Dr Zakir Naik Interview Kabe La Raha Hai
Jab aap onhe interview denay per raazi ker lein 😊
Bhai doing great job ,keep it up,so that people can aware and get enlightened,and explore the materialistic knowledge,and feel the who I AM .
Thanks a ton
@@AzeemUrRehman Ape Dr Zakir Naik Interview Kabe La Raha Hai
Azeem bhai bahut zabardast mashallah mashallah
Agar ye proof ho jaye ki koi energy hai jisne ye kaynat, insan etc.....sab kuchh bnaya hai...
Tab bhi ye kaise proof hoga ki woh musalmano ka Allah hai woh toh isaii ka God, hinduo ka bhagwan bhi ho skta hai
The arguments and evidence is different for that. I will do a detailed video on that.
@@AzeemUrRehman
Please make video in this topic quickly
Jnab ye dawa kisne Kiya ki wo musalmano Ka Allah h sirf ? Allah to sbka h pr Sahi rasta kya h ye smjhne ki zroorat h aap bhe knowledge hasil kre or aise hi video bnaye
Energy itself came into existence at the big bang
Sir smj ni aya Kuch plz zara clear krde ke hamza sir ne support kia h ya unsupport kia h evolution ko...sir video ko 2 times dekha pr conclusion ka ni pata chala..sir plz thora sa bataday asaani hojay gi smjnay me.... Jazak'Allah
انہوں نے نہ حمایت کی نہ مخالفت بلکہ اتنا بتایا ہے کہ نظریہ ارتقاء کو ماننے یا نہ ماننے سے خدا کا انکار لازم نہیں آتا
Jb Qur'an Pak me btadiya ki SB Adam or hawwa ki aulad h TB phir darvin ki bkvas me kiu phse h kya Allah k kalam pr yaqeen nhi ye swal uthta or ye koi aisa masla nhi h seedhi si baat zyada cuthujjati se insan bahek jata h
Very good part of the session.
الحمدللہ
Good work bro....
الحمدللہ
Usmani sahab videos regular banaya karen
Azeem bhai plzzz sabbor ahmad ka sath evolution per programe banai plzzz
you are bringing the exact thoughts of atheists in front of us is an amazing and unique job.
Appreciable task brother, keep educating us regarding atheism vs Islam.
JazakAllah al khair
V.well said
الحمدللہ
6:25 michiao kaku ko main ne bhot suna hai , and he is not a militant athiest and a very good and decent man ,and he is a diest as well
Great bhai apke channel say buhat paida howa allah apko jaza e khair dain
آمین
ماشاءالله بہت ہی اعلیٰ
الحمدللہ
Waiting for Saboor Bhai and your discussion... I met him once and inshAllah he will be next Ahmed deedat and zakir naik for athiesm.
I m too much Impressed by Saboor Bhai work.
InshAllah
Good work azeem bhai
Alhamdullilah
@@AzeemUrRehman Ape Dr Zakir Naik Interview Kabe La Raha Hai
MashaAllah knowledgeable debate.
May Allah reveal more trust on you people ❣️
آمین
Sir ask him k wo creater islam wala creater ha ye proof krien...aur islam k qwneen ya kuch asay mojzay hien ya kuch asi batien hien hdeeso main aur quran main jesay londiyon wali bat ha ....is sab pr bat krien hmza sa
Meri dosri videos mei sub discuss ho choka hai. Baqi londio walay topic per aik separate program ka iraada hai with a prominent scholar
@@AzeemUrRehman sir tabri aur ishaq main jo kuch likha ha us k baray kya khyal ha ? Wo to sab sa old books hien ? Asal islam to i think whi ha ye to bad main modratw kiya gya ha islam ko ? Kya khyal ha ks wjha sa ap tabri aur ishaq ki lekhi baton ko glt kehtay hien ? Aur ap ko i think pta ho ga k kya kya likh ha un main mujhay btanay ki zroorat ni
@@AzeemUrRehman aur boht sari hdesien contridect krti apis main aur boht sari hdeesien shi sand honay k bawajood glt hien un kay bara kya khyal ha ? Ap aj quran main itni science gusatay hien jesay big bang aur sab lakin us wqt ki hdeesien jo tashree krti hien un sa to lagta ha k bat bilkul muhtleef ha asal main to us wqt k logo ko science ka kuch pta he ni tha ? Aur boht sari batien jo quran main contridect krti un kay baray kya khien ga ?
Sir ap kehtay k Allah na frew will d hoi ha to phir Allah quran main kehta ha k mainay boht c qoumo ko tbah kiya tum sa pehlay aur boht logo pr azab bejhay ? Ye kesi free will ha ? Aur ap k nbi na boht sari ryasto ko hat likhay k ayk Allah ki ibadat kro wrna jhang kro ? Aur ik trf ap kehtay k hisab qyamat ko hona ha ? Dosri trf ap kehtay k qabir main b azab milay ga ? Agr hisab qyamat ko hona ha to phir azab qaber main ks wjha sa da rhay hien ? Aur Phir Quran main Allah kehta k lohay mehfooz pr likha ja chuka ha sb agr likha ja chuka ha to phir jo koi kafir ha us main us ka kya qasoor ha ? Kafir b to Allah he paida kr rha ha naw ? To muslmano k ilwa kya baqi sab dozah main jien ga ? Allah kehta ha quran main ye kafir jetnay mrzi achay kam kr la in k amal rkh ki trah ura da jien ga ? Ye kesa logic ha agr hum b hindu k gr paida hotay to kafir hotay ? To hr lihaz sa sir koi wjha he ni ha k hum man lien k ye khuda whi khuda ha js na univrse bnai
@@AzeemUrRehman itni research ha ap ki jwab zroor dwna
بہت ذبردست❤️👍
الحمدللہ
Really it is mind boggling.
👍
Azeem bhai can you make a video on how to deal with doubts... even though after a struggle of three years I have found the answers I was looking for but still I am unable to keep myself firm on faith.
I am going to give you two links of my short videos. If still need help then message me on my Facebook messenger facebook.com/azeemnamaa
ruclips.net/video/-cHcM5q7ETQ/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/SAozLBIWh0I/видео.html
@@AzeemUrRehman thanks a lot bro...really appreciable. May Allah Almighty bless you♥️
Or is tra ki videos or zayada banay or kholay peoples ka damag kholay please❤😢😢
At 18:00 humza made a flawed comparison god of the gaps with atheism of the gaps, without recognising it. In the god of the gaps argument, the last step is 'hence god' which is critical in making this argument fallacious, no such thing in atheism of the gaps (if there even is such a thing), where humza himself says they end the argument at 'we dont know'.
Hamza is right because anything metaphysical is out of the domain of science still atheist hold onto science of the gaps and even if science explain a physical phenomena which shows remarkable evidence of intelligence involved still they rather then picking the best inference hold onto atheism of the gap which is inconsistency ..
@@islamicmessage2419 i dont think you understand the concept of god of the gaps. Let me explain: long ago humans didn't understand lightning. There was a gap in knowledge. Humans created a god of lightning, thor or zeus, to explain this phenomenon. Once scientific knowledge explained how lightning occurs, this god concept fizzled out. Science stops at 'this is all we understand about it, it cant be explained further at the moment.' The god of the gaps argument says 'science can't explain it further, hence it must be a supernatural being doing it'. Humans have equated god with anything they didn't understand like volcanos, tsunamis, death, stars, meteors, disease. I hope this makes the argument clear. Can you give an example of atheism of the gaps the or science of the gaps.
@@dhaagajee00
Consciousness is metaphysical and we can't have physical explanation for something metaphysical..
And there is plenty of scientific literature on hard problem of Consciousness..
Now, atheist should acknowledge that consiousness is metaphysical and only metaphysical explanation is possible which is outside from scientific realm
But they don't acknowledge that either yet many Atheist I have had dialogue with at the end denied consiousness and said consiousness is an illusion..
Same is the case for free will..
Now, This is atheism of the gap that at least acknowledge that something is irreducible to physical and its metaphysical..
And secondly, saying science will find an answer of consiousness is science of the gaps as we know consiousness is metaphysical in nature..
For eg
If you see yellow colour first time only you know this first person subjective conscious experience..
No one else and not even neurons in your brian can't tell us that experience....
First person subjective conscious experience is impossible under scientific physical realm..
@@islamicmessage2419 you again made the god of the gaps argument saying that since consciousness has not been explained and replicated scientifically, it must be metaphysical. Science says, like you just wrote, we will find a scientific explanation for consciousness, which means it makes no claims as yet. To appeal to the metaphysical, you need to first demonstrate that a meta physical realm exists.
About yellow, it's a wavelength and can be reliably measured to fit the definition of the term yellow, whether or not someone subjectively claims and perceives it differently.
@@dhaagajee00
Bro, consiousness is metaphysical because we can't see it nor empirically test it..
Anything metaphysical can't be demonstrated in material world..
And I said that they'd should acknowledge that it's metaphysical in nature rather then waiting that we somehow see it..
Secondly bro when you see yellow colour.. I am not talking about yellow colour can be measured or not..
My point was that your subjective consious experience when you see yellow can it be reducible to neurons firing in your brain...
Obviously not...
If you are depressed only you know the subjective conscious experience of depression.. And physiologist have given a word depression a definition but what it feels to be depressed can only be known by the person who experience it..
And the hard problem of Consciousness is unsolvable because it is out of the realm of naturalism and I can quote academics of the field if you don't want to believe..
So, all I am saying is that acknowledge that consiousness is metaphysical in nature and only meta narrative is possible in this case
Azeem bhai thats the exact thought that came to my mind when I read about Cognitive Revolution in Sapiens. :)
Aray wah Alhamdullilah 😊
@@AzeemUrRehman Ape Dr Zakir Naik Interview Kabe La Raha Hai
19:10 ma Shaa Allah , Hazrat badi aham baat ki aapne
Alhamdullilah
@@AzeemUrRehman Ape Dr Zakir Naik Interview Kabe La Raha Hai
Quraan mei jo bataya gya k kuch Sar-kash logon ko Bandar waghera bana dya tha,,, Darwin bhai ne un Banderoon k Genes tou check nhi ker lyay thay kaheen jo wo kehty hein k Insan or Bander aik jese hein?
Some thinks that but as per recent discoveries, we find fossil records from different parts of the world from Asia to Africa, from Europe to China
Azeem bhai, zabardast work
Thanks
Intellectual talk💯
You will rarely find a Japanese, Chinese, American or British talking about things out of their field of knowledge...but every pakistani is a doctor, Islamic scholar, scientist, biologist you name it and they have it...and the funny thing is people listen to them...
No disrespect
Ab kya kaha jaye aap ki comment pe
Bhai aise hi baat karke yaha tak puhche western countries.
And ha quoting Neil degrase Tyson
“The goal here is not to make everybody a scientist. … What matters is whether they’re scientifically literate and maintain that literacy and that curiosity throughout their lives.”
You know what more funny is ? that the people like you have zero idea about other country people but they falsely talk on their behalf. I travelled around the world, reside in Britain and work daily with US and Japan at my job. Let me tell you, they all talks about these topics but you hardly find anybody like you to spread wrong info.
@@AzeemUrRehman I know what i said...other nations do talk about such things but they know difference between learning and becoming a student before start teaching.
What we Pakistanis, especially in this video, are doing is quoting different people and marvelling on things without even understanding and having conclusive knowledge...one of the interesting things I have noticed is humans don't change...
In old times there were people who used to talk about stupid things with little knowledge..."payan fla shy bri heavy jay...1 time chy 10 bndya no mardi ay" people of same mentality have joined youtube and learned modern things so they can discuss and pose themselves as very intelligent.
I am just trying to say k bhai jis filed k ho usi mein bat kro aur Islam ko seekh to lo phly...mn otha k ikhtlaf krny chl prty hein...i am not singling you out but talking about the mentlity of our nation...i also include myself in it
Masha Allah
Ma na ap ki phali video sari daki ha its amazing or ya wali video bi nice beshak AP ki batay very nice good and Muslman muslman ka bahi ha aik hi jism ham sab ban ka dekhaye bilkul sach ha ham log kyu aik dusaray sa nafrat Kertay ha kyu ?or baki logo I mean phalay logo na boht mahnat ki ha yaar ham log bas dunya ka peashay lagay ha kyu Allah ki traf koy mind hi nahi ha jis agay jawab dena ha very very nice video ❤
Kya baar hai
Amazing episode...will watch the previous ones too. How about you both and Suboor in a single episode.
We intend to do it inshAllah
@@AzeemUrRehman great...looking forward 👍
Literary I was searching such a channel
Azeem bhai, ek specific video banaye ProF Ahmed Rafique Akhtar banye,. I wanna hear your views on him and if have made then let me know . JazakAllah
😊👍
Darwin presented unguided spontaneity that precludes the Almighty. Design argument especially irreducible complexity cannot be refuted. But the core human characteristic, the faculty of Language cannot be explained ever by Darwinism or Neo-Darwinism. All animals communicate: through speech and/or chemicals, such as ants. But only humans have language: grammar and vocabulary. To "evolve" language, human offspring is born without the pre-programming that all the other species' offspring's are endowed with, so that human mothers can deliver babies, still have narrow pelvises and remain bipedal. But this puts human baby in grave danger that can only be mitigated by the parental unit spending years of time in child rearing. Evolution CAN NEVER explain that.
😊👍
If there is no use of a body part, like they say about the appendix, it is because till now we haven't been able to find its use. Doesn't mean there is none. It is possible that we find its use in the future.
There are some researches actually have found its importance in body
@@AzeemUrRehman There is one other thing i wanted to point out. You talked about the iphone not being able to make itself. The atheist has a good comeback to this. Which is that inorganic things and organic things behave differently. Iphone is made of inorganic things while a cell is an organic creature so it can grow. Please keep this in mind and don't use this argument again.
सत्य को विचार से नहीं समझा जा सकता, केवल मौन और मौन के बाद जो आता है उसे शब्दों से नहीं कहा जा सकता, केवल मौन, Truth cannot be understood by thought, only silence and silence cannot be said by words, only silence, (sjk)
Khamoshi ka Adab kero. Ye Awaazo ki Murshid hai.
@@AzeemUrRehman agree
ماشااللہ بہت خوب
Alhamdullilah
Subboor once highly criticised Ghamdi sab and called him a Liberal scholar , I don’t know whether Hamza knows about it or not .
I criticised Ghamidi sahab too. 😊 Subboor is an open minded unbiased researcher, he may have his conclusions which are different from Ghamidi school of thought
Ik hain jo paak bandy
Ik hain dilon k andhy
Jeetain gy sadaq akhair
Haq ka maza yehi ha
Islam e ahmadiyay zindabad