Размер видео: 1280 X 720853 X 480640 X 360
Показать панель управления
Автовоспроизведение
Автоповтор
Why was 1.18 mm seive placed over 2.36 mm it was obvious it won't have any retention The correct order would be 4.75-2.36 then 1.18
"Yes, you are correct. It was a descriptive error."
The BS1377 wet sieving method is more straightforward, thank you
Since sieve of 2.36 is misplaced below 1.18 the entire test result would change
Very comprrhensive Thanks for sharing
Thank you sir.
Wet sieve analysis 11:58
ty
HI sir this instrument company share sir
2.36 mm should be above 1.18 mm
Why was 1.18 mm seive placed over 2.36 mm it was obvious it won't have any retention The correct order would be 4.75-2.36 then 1.18
"Yes, you are correct. It was a descriptive error."
The BS1377 wet sieving method is more straightforward, thank you
Since sieve of 2.36 is misplaced below 1.18 the entire test result would change
Very comprrhensive Thanks for sharing
Thank you sir.
Wet sieve analysis 11:58
ty
HI sir this instrument company share sir
2.36 mm should be above 1.18 mm
"Yes, you are correct. It was a descriptive error."