Wonderful Dialogue. So interesting for me to see a consilience between this and the ‘dwelling-mobility’ theory of well-being from a very different western phenomenological tradition.
What an incredible collaboration! Other than ongoing breakthroughs, updates and revisions; I don’t think there’s a lot missing between these two. Can I please suggest an interview with Thomas Metzinger next?
Very similar indeed. However science and language or math can't go beyond pure awareness to describe the level 4 and 5. I have to thank loch again for the general experiential map.
Wonderful Dialogue. So interesting for me to see a consilience between this and the ‘dwelling-mobility’ theory of well-being from a very different western phenomenological tradition.
What an incredible collaboration! Other than ongoing breakthroughs, updates and revisions; I don’t think there’s a lot missing between these two. Can I please suggest an interview with Thomas Metzinger next?
Very similar indeed. However science and language or math can't go beyond pure awareness to describe the level 4 and 5.
I have to thank loch again for the general experiential map.