The Big Picture - Birthright citizenship in U.S.

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 9 фев 2025
  • With congressional elections a week away, President Donald Trump on Tuesday said he will seek to scrap the right of citizenship for U.S.-born children of non-citizens and illegal immigrants as he tries again to dramatically reshape immigration policies. Reviving his support for a legally questionable theory, Trump told the Axios news website he would issue an executive order on so-called birthright citizenship, an issue that has long rankled some conservative Republicans. Trump’s previous calls to end the practice have resonated with his political base, but moderate Republicans and some legal experts say Trump is running afoul of the U.S. Constitution. Under the Constitution’s 14th Amendment, enacted in the wake of the Civil War to ensure that black Americans previously subject to slavery had full citizenship rights, citizenship is granted to “all persons born or naturalized in the United States.” It has been routinely interpreted over the years to confer citizenship to people born in the United States whose parents are illegal immigrants.
    ANCHOR- Frank Rausan Pereira
    GUEST-
    K. V. Prasad, Associate Editor, The Tribune
    Dr. Sreeram Chaulia, Dean, Jindal School of International Affairs
    Sheel Kant Sharma, Former Diplomat
    Robinder Sachdev, Director, India Affairs, United States India Political Action Committee

Комментарии • 39

  • @prajapatirahul3766
    @prajapatirahul3766 6 лет назад +22

    Sir, please discuss the dispute between "GOI & RBI" in the Big Picture show...

    • @abrarahelahi2797
      @abrarahelahi2797 6 лет назад

      Unfortunately they so far did not analyze the CBI row, the much awaited debate on this platform

    • @deepakbisht88
      @deepakbisht88 6 лет назад

      @@abrarahelahi2797 indeed
      the much awaited discussion the table .
      must be dicussed

    • @vipulbisht620
      @vipulbisht620 6 лет назад

      Bro vice president is the chairperson of rajya sabha tv
      So I don't think they will show anything which put government in bad light especially when elections are near.
      Recently a woman journalist of rs tv was suspended for 2 weeks for asking a question was putting government in bad light( I think the question was about atalji).

    • @vipulbisht620
      @vipulbisht620 6 лет назад

      @@informal2928 bro about the news anchor it was in a newspaper article (not my theory)
      2.) every polity student know that
      Vice president is the chairperson of rajya sabha tv
      You are abusing, that mean you are not an aspirant Or someone who wish to know but just a brainwashed sheep who follow his master without any question
      I expect you to be a bit polite
      This is rajya sabha tv not some zee news show

    • @priteesingh7385
      @priteesingh7385 6 лет назад

      Esa koi debate allow nhi hai jisse citizens panic ho or stability ko problem ho

  • @Youngmonk13
    @Youngmonk13 6 лет назад +3

    "Last man on the boat is always the suspect"

  • @snr5950
    @snr5950 6 лет назад

    Dear Mr Frank Pereira - thanq for hosting this important topic which has lot of relevance to many in India...

  • @worlock27
    @worlock27 6 лет назад +4

    Two (2) illegal aliens do not make a citizen. Birthright citizenship for illegal aliens is a common misconception. The plain meaning of the 14th Amendment means that one must BOTH be born in United States AND be subject to the jurisdiction thereof. Since there are two explicit requirements, they both cannot be met by simply being born on U.S. soil. The history of the drafting of the 14th Amendment makes clear that the language “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” meant a citizen could not owe allegiance to any other foreign power. This excludes illegal immigrants who are in defiance of U.S. jurisdiction and are citizens of a foreign power. Indians (Native Americans) such as myself were not even allowed to become citizens until the late 1920's.
    The author of the 14th amendment citizenship clause, Jacob Howard, described the intent and limits of the clause while addressing and introducing it to the 39th Congress for ratification in 1866. In that speech, he stated “This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the government of the United States...”

  • @informal2928
    @informal2928 6 лет назад +1

    Prof. Chaulia 👏😃

  • @amanraj9204
    @amanraj9204 6 лет назад +1

    Problem
    •Approximately 7.5% of all births in the U.S are to unauthorized immigrants.
    •There are 4.5 millions children who are born to unauthorized immigrants.
    Current Laws
    °14th amendment to United States 🇺🇸 Constitution on 1868.Applies to incorporated territories also.
    °Indian citizenship Act of 1924.
    Reasons
    ~Population increased from 2.7 million in 2003 to 4 5 million by 2010.
    ~Issue of chain migration.
    ~Birth Tourism.
    ~Only 30 out of 194 countries grant automatic citizenship.
    1)Electoral politics
    2)Children citizenship claim
    Is this Dismissed
    It can't be dismissed.
    •He banned Muslim travel
    •Pull out of TPP, Paris, H1 spouses.
    Election optics.
    °Green cards holders.
    °H1 professional
    °Illegal documented people children.
    Traction getting on ground
    Democrat more likely to get in.
    Legal interpretation ,1857,1898-alien and diplomat children.
    Last man on the boat is suspect.
    Why necessary?
    √Question of healthcare
    √Wage stagnation
    √US grow up but disenchament in some quarters
    √Sexual exploitation
    √Democrat can better handle emigration.
    Executive order
    Republican oppose Obama order so it cannot oppose emigration issues.
    American bureaucracy trying to put more hurdles.
    This will need ratification of 2/3rd Congress and 3/4th of state.
    Way Forward
    =>Trump is attempting to please his base by this polarisation tactic which more likely to cause violence. It is in American self interest to reject this policy.
    Thank you.🙏💕

  • @amarjeetverma7530
    @amarjeetverma7530 6 лет назад

    oh! thanks sir

  • @Moses-r1r
    @Moses-r1r 6 лет назад

    Good one as always

  • @JayJay-fg4bd
    @JayJay-fg4bd 6 лет назад

    Why the hell, Indians are Talking about another country ??
    How about India's citizenship policy ???

  • @wonkhangs
    @wonkhangs 6 лет назад +2

    I'm glad Trump won. Love to watch Dr getting triggered

  • @anupamsrk
    @anupamsrk 6 лет назад

    Frank rocks😎

  • @sumanverma-oy8sr
    @sumanverma-oy8sr 6 лет назад +1

    Thanks rstv, 31/10 /2018

  • @saurabhkumarvishnuvardhan7673
    @saurabhkumarvishnuvardhan7673 6 лет назад

    Worth watching as always

  • @patelvastralaya
    @patelvastralaya 6 лет назад

    thanks good way debates rstv

  • @rohitsharma6457
    @rohitsharma6457 6 лет назад +1

    Where is subtitle of today show

    • @WeirdlyGripping
      @WeirdlyGripping 6 лет назад +1

      bhai kal k match ki tyyri kro yha utube pr ky time waste kr rae :P

    • @rohitsharma6457
      @rohitsharma6457 6 лет назад

      @@WeirdlyGripping Bhai ek do Rohit Sharma upsc walo ko bhi chiye

    • @WeirdlyGripping
      @WeirdlyGripping 6 лет назад +1

      @@rohitsharma6457 ky bt kahi h bhai.....tabadtod dhakad na long lasting....bhai.but....UPSC need Kohli,Sachin and Dravid for sure and most importantly MSD and Kapil Dev
      i dnt think i need to xplain the reason....do i??

    • @rohitsharma6457
      @rohitsharma6457 6 лет назад

      @@WeirdlyGripping Nahi Bhai main ssamaj gya.

  • @divinelandhimachalpradesh995
    @divinelandhimachalpradesh995 6 лет назад

    Gud evening sir

  • @aspirant8996
    @aspirant8996 6 лет назад

    Trump must do anything which favours his countrymen, but he must be concerned with the environment because air, water don't have boundaries.