No Proof of Aryan Invasion - Koenraad Elst -

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 21 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 173

  • @AronAroniteOnlineTV
    @AronAroniteOnlineTV 5 лет назад +30

    At last the most prominent Indologist who kept reminding the Jury is still out on Aryan Invasion Theory seems to have found some fresh Material to clinch the Case against AIT and justify its Revision if not convincingly Reject it as Problematic. So it is very important the Indian Government studies this latest Update by one of the most accomplished expert. Modi 2.0 must ask the History Department to invite Dr Elst and hold a Workshop on Aryan Invasion Theory.

  • @keshavsingh8583
    @keshavsingh8583 5 лет назад +14

    Thank you sir if you are reading this just know that you have inspired some of us...

  • @rajatsh5261
    @rajatsh5261 5 лет назад +12

    You guys made it happen..... congratulations🎉

    • @happybiswas9904
      @happybiswas9904 5 лет назад +1

      @chess lessons who is making Faun of whom?😒

    • @happybiswas9904
      @happybiswas9904 5 лет назад +1

      @chess lessons i know no pure permanent dna is present of ancient people of which can prove who came before whom then I don't think that calling any particular race as most civilized people is just foolishness and another question if still anyone wanna prove themselves as civilized people then they must see the history of own cultures and religion which carried themselves from thousands years which can prove the originaty of any people who came before whom and who were most civilized from ancient times I bet no culture and religion can defeat Hinduism😂

    • @kvpillai
      @kvpillai 5 лет назад +3

      @chess lessons you must be a marxist or a christian prosetelyzer to claim that there is no evidence of vedic religion. Even AIT proponents agree that Rig Veda is at least 1500BC. You are blinded by your propaganda.

    • @kvpillai
      @kvpillai 5 лет назад +2

      @chess lessons The term Hinduism was coined by the British and there were many schools of beliefs which sprung from the Vedic or Dharmic tradition including Budhism and Jainism, which has Vedic underpinnings. They are all part of Sanatana Dharma. Everyone agrees that Rig veda and Vedas in general are the oldest religious text and is to day the fundamental bedrock of Hindiusm. What you are to Brahminism is the ritualistic traditions in modern Hinduism. That has evolved over time and will continue to evolve.

    • @kvpillai
      @kvpillai 5 лет назад +2

      @chess lessons yeah whatever, not like anyone needs your vote of approval. No point arguing with you over youtube comments.

  • @sen782k8
    @sen782k8 5 лет назад +7

    Same like the word 'Dravidian' which can be traced back to being used first by Aadhi Sankara, the word 'Aryan' can be traced back to being used by the various Rishis who came up with the RigVeda, both the word were used in a very much different context to the racial meanings they are associated with today. This is very sad for our Country which is the birthplace for 2 of the oldest languages in the World. The Colonialists did a very good job of indoctrinating generations of our people to mythical theories which divide along Aryan/Dravidian & North Indian/South Indian lines. Hope future generations of Scholars debunk these theories to get the truth & awareness atleast to the Indian masses.

    • @sakogekchyan7366
      @sakogekchyan7366 3 года назад +1

      Yes the word Dravidian is a later invention. Nobody denies this. But it does describe a linguistic reality. The people who we call Dravidian speak a distinct family of languages that is not related to Sanskrit or Indo European languages. Just like linguistic scholars describe certain ethnic groups in west and central Africa as Niger Congo speakers. The people don’t call themselves Niger Congo people. This is just a classification term.

    • @praz7
      @praz7 Год назад

      Iranians always used the word Aryan for racial context. In India this becomes word for nobility.

    • @Joseph-yu4lx
      @Joseph-yu4lx 7 месяцев назад

      In human history what happened is happened. Past is past. You cannot change as per wishes desires or necessities
      The hired experts cannot also do that.
      Your original home of birth, your born habits are always embedded in your culture.

  • @19683
    @19683 5 лет назад +1

    "Farsi has bad in more or less the same sense as the English word, but this is regarded by linguists as a coincidence. The forms of the words diverge as they are traced back in time (Farsi bad comes from Middle Persian vat), and such accidental convergences exist across many languages, given the vast number of words in each and the limited range of sounds humans can make to signify them. Among other coincidental matches with English are Korean mani "many," Chinese pei "pay," Nahuatl (Aztecan) huel "well," Maya hol"hole.""
    Farsi bad
    Old Persian vat
    Marathi vait

  • @AK-uf4ln
    @AK-uf4ln 4 года назад +3

    Dravid is a sanskrit word used by adi Shankara to indicate it's birthplace which is kaladi in Kerala not as a racial term

    • @achudhan3001
      @achudhan3001 2 года назад

      Shut up bitch we know how the Dravidian word you’re dumbass claiming everything huh shut up

    • @GyanTvAmit
      @GyanTvAmit Год назад +1

      dravid means land surrounded by water you fool

  • @chilarai1
    @chilarai1 5 лет назад +2

    The curious thing is the Europeans never took so much effort to construct a theory debunking the Mayan, Inca, Egyptian, Sumerian civilizations. Why India? And why such vehement opposition to and twisting of the new scientifically irrefutable proofs coming out in Rakhigarhi, Bhirrina, Keezadi? Because they knew all along that India was the single source of all of the world's civilization, including language, technology, social development, science, philosophy. This they could not and cannot digest.

    • @sakogekchyan7366
      @sakogekchyan7366 3 года назад

      Don’t flatter yourself my friend. They do the same kind of stuff with African history.

  • @Wojak-explainer
    @Wojak-explainer 5 лет назад +5

    Good and informative video

  • @MahendraKumar-xe5hk
    @MahendraKumar-xe5hk 5 лет назад +13

    Please add hindi subtitles....

  • @govindarun1947
    @govindarun1947 3 года назад

    6:50, 9:27, 13:40, 15:50
    39:47

  • @deepakrathod9840
    @deepakrathod9840 5 лет назад +1

    Sir, you r grate

  • @tonyschoeber870
    @tonyschoeber870 5 лет назад +5

    weather sanskrit is related with european language or not does not matter west ( islam and christian) like dominance not learning we should not be in the trap of west who is best or superior we should express our identity which is sanskrit veda and guru guru system is not found in any other system moksha( ultimate goal) of life is not found in any other society advaita ( oneness or no other ) is not found in any other society society based on competition conflict exploitation subjugation should be rejected which are ingrained in foreign ideas (n islam christian capitalism and communism ) foreign ideas should be evaluated on the scale of dharma content we must clean the dirt / dust to keep our land ( sacred land) clean ( dev bhumi) keep india --sudh bodh mukt and nithya

    • @sakogekchyan7366
      @sakogekchyan7366 3 года назад

      What about the other aspects of the Indian subcontinent like the aboriginal people and their tribal religions? What about the Buddhist and Jain traditions? Why should the Sanskrit and Vedic element dominate all the others?

  • @mazyar_
    @mazyar_ 3 года назад

    Okay that's all well and good, but how does Dr Elst explain the *Mitanni* *inscriptions* ???
    Indic Mitra is first attested in a 14th century BCE Mitanni inscription in which an Indo-Aryan king of Mitanni (in current day Anatolia) invokes the gods Mitra, Indra, Varuna, and the Nasatyas as guarantors of his sworn obligations.

    • @guru__chanakya
      @guru__chanakya 3 года назад +2

      They were the descends of later Rig-Vedic People who migrated out if India

  • @etheniclovers7219
    @etheniclovers7219 5 лет назад +1

    Video Hindi version me bhi dala Kare ....Taki sabhi Jo samjh a ske...

  • @vikramjeetsingh6539
    @vikramjeetsingh6539 4 года назад +2

    Sir please these lecture should be in hindi so that we learn our school student in hindi .please dub in hindi

  • @19683
    @19683 5 лет назад +1

    Of course there was a language before Sanskrit, the meaning of which is cultured.

  • @AdityaKumar__108
    @AdityaKumar__108 5 лет назад +7

    Jai Shri Ram

  • @jamesstevenson7725
    @jamesstevenson7725 Год назад

    India is the birthplace of Sanskrit civilization

  • @विनयजोशी1
    @विनयजोशी1 4 года назад +1

    👍

  • @saththiyambharathiyan8175
    @saththiyambharathiyan8175 5 лет назад +10

    The word Aryan it self Pure Tamil word this word is found ancient sangam Tamil literatures...... there are close relations between Tamil and Sanskrit..... roots of the sanskrit is deeply rooted in south Indian languages particularly Tamil and Malayalam.......

  • @ronhak3736
    @ronhak3736 5 лет назад +2

    Iranian hunter-gathers mixed with indigenous hunter-gathers to form Indus Valley Civilization then in 1500 BCE Iranian-Bakteian expand in India. Hindu is a Persian word. DNA tells different story.

    • @AnmolKumar-km3gd
      @AnmolKumar-km3gd 4 года назад +3

      The latest rakhigarhi research says something else.
      The preprint did say that harappans were indian tribals/hunter gatherers and iranian farmers.
      But when the research was peer reviewed and made public, the final statement was that indus valley civ had no iranian intervention.
      www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/31495572/
      Hindu is not a persian word. Sindhu is a sanskrit word. The greeks first called it Indu and then the word became hindu.
      en.m.wikibooks.org/wiki/Hinduism/Etymology_of_the_words_Hindu_and_Hinduism
      I'm not a supporter of aryan migration theory yet i know more about it than the supporters. In fact every hindu intellectual knows more than the rest of the insects who call themselves humans.

  • @pkbalram640
    @pkbalram640 5 лет назад +6

    The only universal language that earthlings was given is pure Sanskrit.
    The rest are all pick up language based on sanskrit..
    Its the language of the god and taught to the sages in India.

    • @godbless5150
      @godbless5150 4 года назад

      Rakhigarhi DNA prove that the skeleton has more related to the south Indian people called ( Irula in the Nilgiri mountains ) of the Kerala and Tamil Nadu .
      Not to the North indian people .
      The Keezhadi excavation in Tamil Nadu has proved the Tamil language relationship with indus valley civilization language .
      And main thing that No , Hindi or North Indian News channel came to Tamil Nadu and show it in Hindi news or any other North channel .
      The central government get affaired of that the Central government transferred the A.S.I officer of the Keezhadi excavation site of Tamil Nadu to Assam state and Tamil Nadu High court orders the central government to transferred the officer back to Tamil Nadu with in 15 day's .
      1 www.indiatoday.in/india/story/rakhigarhi-excavation-indus-valley-civilisation-irula-dravidian-language-1328959-2018-08-31
      2 www.indiatoday.in/magazine/cover-story/story/20180910-rakhigarhi-dna-study-findings-indus-valley-civilisation-1327247-2018-08-31

    • @mantratantra
      @mantratantra 4 года назад

      Was it modern sanskrit, or the old Sanskrit? Modern Sanskrit is only about 3000 years old.

  • @pankratoshellas183
    @pankratoshellas183 4 года назад

    Anatolia, Mesopotamia, the Levant and Aegean is the homeland of Cattle domestication, Agriculture, lactose Tolerance and CIVILIZATION, and not anywhere else. The idea of "Aryans" is not so important.... India veberates the Cow, thanks to Mediterranean and Levantine reverence forv the Cow, which is the Homeland of Cattle domestication. Nordic people never had a Civilization, they were illiterate and were Lactose intolerant before the Cattle Domesticating Mediterranean people entered the North and interbred with hunter Gatherers and gave then Lactose Tolerance, cattle and farming, something they had not of before.

  • @sauravmazumder7489
    @sauravmazumder7489 5 лет назад +8

    How can Aryans invade us when we are ourselves Aryans .

    • @kikit7262
      @kikit7262 5 лет назад +1

      Lol

    • @nautiyogi8386
      @nautiyogi8386 5 лет назад +6

      @@kikit7262 what lol ? r1a is native. Paper coming out soon.

    • @b.m.5068
      @b.m.5068 5 лет назад +1

      @@nautiyogi8386 are you sure bro?
      Can you give me some sources?

    • @akshaynautiyal6644
      @akshaynautiyal6644 5 лет назад

      H. N. Just youtube “Arth fest Aryan invasion” there you have at 38 th minute ... Niraj Rai the author claiming publicly ..

    • @b.m.5068
      @b.m.5068 5 лет назад

      @@akshaynautiyal6644 no he's not
      In fact r1a1 is a male gene.
      The sample was a female skeleton. I'm friends with niraj rai on fb and it is said that there was no steppe DNA found.
      Don't be a blind eye. I don't support Aryan invasion or migration but I don't want to lie, or blabber on half knowledge.

  • @ronhak3736
    @ronhak3736 5 лет назад +3

    Sanskrit language and R1a1 Haplogroup are signs of so called Aryan migration. While Sanskrit is a marker of Hindu nationalism for the BJP, it might be surprised, even shocked, to know that the first people to leave behind evidence of having spoken Sanskrit aren't Hindus or Indians - they were Syrians. The data from Rakhigarhi and from the 523 subjects of the study published in Science provide genetic confirmation of a migration from India’s north-west beginning after 2000 BCE, which corresponds precisely with linguistic and archaeological information about the movement of Vedic people into India.

    • @godbless5150
      @godbless5150 4 года назад

      @Dan Neutron Sanskrit is Foreign Language
      Rakhigarhi DNA prove that the skeleton has more related to the south Indian people called ( Irula in the Nilgiri mountains ) of the Kerala and Tamil Nadu .
      Not to the North indian people .
      The Keezhadi excavation in Tamil Nadu has proved the Tamil language relationship with indus valley civilization language .
      And main thing that No , Hindi or North Indian News channel came to Tamil Nadu and show it in Hindi news or any other North channel .
      The central government get affaired of that the Central government transferred the A.S.I officer of the Keezhadi excavation site of Tamil Nadu to Assam state and Tamil Nadu High court orders the central government to transferred the officer back to Tamil Nadu with in 15 day's .
      1 www.indiatoday.in/india/story/rakhigarhi-excavation-indus-valley-civilisation-irula-dravidian-language-1328959-2018-08-31
      2 www.indiatoday.in/magazine/cover-story/story/20180910-rakhigarhi-dna-study-findings-indus-valley-civilisation-1327247-2018-08-31

    • @godbless5150
      @godbless5150 4 года назад

      @Dan Neutron In India their are only 4,000 Sanskrit script found .

    • @godbless5150
      @godbless5150 4 года назад

      @Dan Neutron In India their only 4,000 Sanskrit script writings founded from British India to independent India.
      Their are more than 60,000 Tamil script writings and Ancient Coin founded in India and other countries like China , Japan , Thailand , cambodia , Singapore , Leo's , Indonesia , Vietnam Malaysia , sir lanka , Maldives , Egypt , Greek , Roman , Israel , Iran, Myanmar , Philippines.
      How much central government tries to hide the truth it will came out Keezhadi excavation in Tamil and Indus valley civilization language similarities.
      If know Tamil see this
      ruclips.net/video/FTDs6tjNqpg/видео.html

    • @godbless5150
      @godbless5150 4 года назад

      @Dan Neutron This is Lost one see this Russian Aryan discovery
      ruclips.net/video/91IXhJum2gQ/видео.html
      ruclips.net/video/bswmevsO9Pk/видео.html

  • @Anonymous_Tech.
    @Anonymous_Tech. 5 лет назад +9

    Yeah, Recent Finding also tells same thing. Aryans are the native of India.

    • @julie5978
      @julie5978 5 лет назад

      What recent findings?

    • @xeonquantum3966
      @xeonquantum3966 5 лет назад +2

      Native? Eurasian steppes pastoral gene were Aryan. Which is now present among north Indian especially brahmins.

    • @BladeFromDarkness
      @BladeFromDarkness 5 лет назад

      @@xeonquantum3966 are you goona give any proof,or just goona present yourself as a esteemed professor !!!

    • @godbless5150
      @godbless5150 4 года назад

      Rakhigarhi DNA prove that the skeleton has more related to the south Indian people called ( Irula in the Nilgiri mountains ) of the Kerala and Tamil Nadu .
      Not to the North indian people .
      The Keezhadi excavation in Tamil Nadu has proved the Tamil language relationship with indus valley civilization language .
      And main thing that No , Hindi or North Indian News channel came to Tamil Nadu and show it in Hindi news or any other North channel .
      The central government get affaired of that the Central government transferred the A.S.I officer of the Keezhadi excavation site of Tamil Nadu to Assam state and Tamil Nadu High court orders the central government to transferred the officer back to Tamil Nadu with in 15 day's .
      1 www.indiatoday.in/india/story/rakhigarhi-excavation-indus-valley-civilisation-irula-dravidian-language-1328959-2018-08-31
      2 www.indiatoday.in/magazine/cover-story/story/20180910-rakhigarhi-dna-study-findings-indus-valley-civilisation-1327247-2018-08-31

  • @godbless5150
    @godbless5150 4 года назад

    Tamil language history and Keezhadi excavation in Tamil Nadu and it's relationship with indus valley civilization language .

  • @zishaan_rock8762
    @zishaan_rock8762 3 года назад

    *PURA END TAK DHYAN SE PADNE PAR HI SAMAJME AAYEGA*
    DUNIYA ME SAB SE PEHLA INSAAN OR PAIGAMBAR ADAM AS AASMAAN SE ZAMEEN PAR AAJ KE SRILANKA ME UTREY THEY US JAGAH KO AAJ ADAM PEEK KE NAAM SE JANA JATA HE, US WAQT SRILANKA OR BHARAT AFRICA KHAND KA HISSA THA PAR JAB BHARAT OR SRILANKA AFRICA SE ALAG HOKAR ASIA KE LADAKH KI TARAF TAKRAYA TO HIMALAY PARVAT KA NIRMAN HUVA OR YE AAJ KE SCINCE SE BHI SAABIT HE
    *DUNIYA ME SAB SE PEHLE INSAAN PAIGAMBAR ADAM AS, AASMAAN SE ZAMEEN PAR UTREY, US KE BAAD LAKHO HAZARO SAALO TAK BAHOT SAARE PAIGAMBAR JAISE KE NOOH AS, IBRAHIM AS, MUSA AS, ESSA AS, AATEY RAHE OR LOGO KO SAMJHATE RAHE KE US ALLAH KI IBADAT KARO JISNE ZAMEEN AASMAAN SURAJ CHAND INSAAN JANWAR OR IS SHRISHTI KO BANAYA, Q K PAIGAMBAR KA KAAM ALLAH KA PAIGAM SANDESH PAHUCHANA HOTA THA PAR PAIGAMBAR KE DUNIYA SE CHALE JAANE KE KUCH SAAL BAAD LOG FIR SE GUMRAH HO JATEY THEY OR ALLAH KI JAGAH PAIGAMBAR, INSAAN, OR JANWAR KI MURTI BANAKAR OR AAG SURAJ CHAND DHIRTI KI PUJA OR PARASTISH KARNE LAGTE THEY OR ALLAH KI BHEJI HUVI KITAB ME ULAT FAIR OR MIXING CHEDCHAAD KARTE REHTE THEY, PAR JAB ALLAH NE DUNIYA KE SAB SE AAKHRI PAIGAMBAR MOHAMMAD SAW, KO LOGO KO SAMJHANE KE LIYE BHEJA TO EK AISI KITAB QUR'AN KE SATH BHEJA JISKO QAYAMAT TAK LOGO KO MU JABANI YAAD KARKE APNE DIL OR DIMAG ME MEHFOOZ KARNE KA HUKM DIYA JISSE LOG US KITAB QUR'AN ME PEHLE KE LOGO KI TARAH ULAT FAIR MIXING CHEDCHAAD OR CHANGES NAA KAR SAKEY OR JAB TAK DUNIYA KA WAJOOD HE TAB TAK LOGO TAK SAHI OR SACCHI QUR'AN PAHOCHE OR LOG US ALLAH KI IBADAT KAREY JISNEY ZAMEEN AASMAAN SURAJ CHAND INSAAN JANWAR OR IS SHRISHTI KO BANAYA*
    *KUCH LOG IS GALAT FEHMI ME HE KE ISLAM DHIRM PAIGAMBAR MOHAMMAD SAW, KE JAMANE ME AAYA THA JAB KE PAIGAMBAR MOHAMMAD SAW, SE PEHLE LAKHO HAZARO SAAL PEHLE BAHOT SAARE PAIGAMBAR AAKAR GAYE THEY OR SABHI PAIGAMBAR KA EK HI PAIGAM SANDESH THA KE ALLAH EK HE,* *ALLAH KA NA KOI BETA HE, OR NA KOI BHAI, OR ALLAH KE ALAVA KISIKI BHI IBADAT KARNA GUNAH PAAP HE*
    *MSG BAHOT BADA HO RAHA HE IS LIYE ISLAM KI OR JAANKAARI KE LIYE NICHE DIYE HUVE LINK PAR CLIK KAREY.*
    ruclips.net/video/ret8LrReCtQ/видео.html .

    • @zishaan_rock8762
      @zishaan_rock8762 3 года назад

      @Ashray FAKE NAHI SACH HE YE
      JAB JAB INSAAN BHATAK GAYA TAB TAB INSAAN MURTI PUJA KARNE LAGA OR BHAGAWAN ALLAH ISHWAR KI JAGAH INSAAN OR JANWAR OR SURAJ CHAND KI PUJA KARNE LAGA,
      JISNE ZAMEEN AASMAAN SURAJ CHAND INSAAN JANWAR OR IS SHRISHTI KO BANAYA PUJA OR IBADAT US BHAGWAN ALLAH ISHWAR KI HONI CHAHIYE PAR AFSOS LOGO NE TO ZAMEEN AASMAAN SURAJ CHAND INSAAN JANWAR KO HI BHAGWAN BANA DIYA

  • @d.vidyadhar6991
    @d.vidyadhar6991 4 года назад

    Why these old videos are again daily showing here ? Is it to divert our attention from present failure of BJP government ?

  • @suryadevararao1795
    @suryadevararao1795 5 лет назад +2

    Ha,ha,ha, Scientists are supposed to have open mind. Those who preach against caste-ism practice their own version of untouchability! The so called leftist intellectuals with their western friends need to grow up. May be Talageri is right or may be he is wrong but acknowledging his analysis of Rigveda on scientific merits must be done. May be Arya people came from some where may be not who cares? We were not living then to say anything conclusively.

    • @19683
      @19683 5 лет назад

      The Campbell engendered Madrasis care.

    • @suryadevararao1795
      @suryadevararao1795 5 лет назад

      Abe Bahadur Khanke aulath you are no different from any Madrasi. Go get your DNA sequenced.

    • @19683
      @19683 5 лет назад +1

      @@suryadevararao1795 dna has nothing to do with treachery, that the Madrasis engendered by Campbell are full of, Dara and Aurangazeb were brothers.

    • @19683
      @19683 5 лет назад +1

      It seems you are a closet Madrasi with a Sanskrit first & last name.

    • @suryadevararao1795
      @suryadevararao1795 5 лет назад

      Treachery? People of AP use the term "Mayala Marathi" means Marathis are virtually cheaters. You guys are the real 3rd genders in India. Really look at your people's faces neither you look north nor you look South. One more thing, the biggest cheater is your Baba Saheb in 1940s with those dumb reservations and that crazy Bala Saheb in 1990s. Marathi Kanjoos" go back and read my first comment before barking again. Get lost for good.

  • @theeuropeanapotheosis8649
    @theeuropeanapotheosis8649 3 года назад

    Koenraad Elst, rejection of our people's history is blood treason.

  • @sugavaneshwaransellappan9392
    @sugavaneshwaransellappan9392 5 лет назад +2

    It's not actually Aryan invasion, it's only aryan migration.

  • @shuraravi3045
    @shuraravi3045 5 лет назад +1

    Russian language = Sanskrit

    • @b.m.5068
      @b.m.5068 5 лет назад +6

      False

    • @shuraravi3045
      @shuraravi3045 5 лет назад

      O? Really?))) ruclips.net/video/ptDVaVlw9m4/видео.html&app=desktop

    • @GyanTvAmit
      @GyanTvAmit Год назад +1

      yes russian language come from sanskrit which means sanskrit is older and indian language❤

  • @Samyu_N
    @Samyu_N 2 года назад

    Aryan and Dravidian race theory is 100% true. Only thing its NOT Aryan Invasion rather it is just Aryan migration.
    Aryans are called as Devas
    Dravidian's are called Asuras
    Aryan Gods - Lord Indra, Lord Varuna, Lord Vayu, Lord Brahma & Lord Ram
    Dravidian Gods - Shiva, Visnu, Krishna & Karthikeya
    In Four Vedas there is NO Mention about Lord Shiva, Lord Vishnu [Thiru Maal] & Lord Subramanian [Murugan]. In Vedas they only worship Lord Indra, Lord Varuna & Lord Vayu. In Rig Veda they mention about Lord Rudra but he is NOT Lord Shiva. There is NO Place where they mentioned about Lord Shiva or Linga. These are all Tamil gods Lord Shiva, Lord Thiru maal [Vishnu] & Lord Murugan [Subramanian] are all ancient Tamils lived in Tamil Land.
    Aryan by Birth - Ram, Lakshman
    Dravidian by Birth - Ravan, Shiva, Visnu, Krishna & Karthikeya
    Aryan Language - Sanskrit
    Dravidian Language - Tamil
    Aryan [Sankrit] Grammar - Panini’s Astadhyayi
    Dravidan [Tamil] Grammar - Tholkaappiyam [Still available]
    Panini did not mention the name of even a single earlier Sanskrit grammar which he has followed. The names he mentioned as earlier Sanskrit grammarians are originally Prakrit and Pali grammarians. Prakrit and Pali grammarians have followed Aindhra grammar which is followed by Tholkaappiyar. Tholkapiyar clearly states that there are numerous Tamil Grammar works prior to his Tholkappiyam and he followed Aindharam Grammar for his work. Akathiyar also wrote a grammar for Tamil. Tharanath ,the Tibet scholar has clearly stated that Aindhiram was a Tamil grammar. Sari Buddha had studied Aindhiram.
    Aryan by Birth - Bramins
    Dravidian by Birth - Sudras [Tamils - please note Tamils lived through out India]
    Etymology of the word Bramin [பேர் அமணன் -> பிராமணன் -> பிராமின் ] Payrr Ammanan -> Brahmanan -> Bramin. Its a Pure Tamil word given as Title to people who gained enormous wisdom in their life. In later days this title name was stolen by Aryan Bramins and made it as a varna by Birth.
    Sanghis will tell that Ravana was a Bramin, Ravana is Asura [Dravidian] by birth and Bramin is his title name. He is a master of 10 different science
    Etymology for the name Krishna [ கருதினன் -> கிருத்தினன் -> கிருஷ்ணா ] Karuthinan → Kirutinan → Krishna . Karuthinan means man of philosophy its a Title given to Krishna
    We all know that Krishna is Dark in Complexion and he is a Cow herder he is a Tamil.
    Rig Veda has several references to blonde haired Indra destroying Dark skinned Asuras [Dravidian's]. If you read most of the Sanskrit puranas you can notice that its all about Fight between Aryans and Dravidians [Devas and Asuras]
    Language naturally evolves over 1000s of years it can NOT be invented by one single guy Agathiyar, Tamil language is NOT invented by Agathiyar as told by PERVERTED Sanskrit Myth, one has to Talk with scientific facts should NOT vomit PERVERTED Sanskrit Myths. Just like Tholkappiyar Agathiyar also wrote grammar for Tamil in ancient times thats it.
    Tamil is older then Sanskrit. Its actually Tamil root words which are there in Sanskrit, NOT the other way around. Recent [year 2020] excavation in Keezadi have written Tamil inscription which is older than 2500 years. But on the other hand Sanskrit didn't even had a script to write until 4 CE note it is CE not BCE, it adopted devanagari script in 4 CE and started writing puranas like Ramayana ... etc. Prior to this Sanskrit Vedas were transferred to next generation only orally, they said it is very sacred and only Brahmins have to recite it
    Google - Mayiladumparai Excavation in Tamil Nadu - Tamils knew use of iron 4,000 years ago, archaeological findings show
    Google - Porunai civilisation is 3,200 years old
    Tamils do not have Vedic culture roots, their roots are different. Vedic culture is a third rated culture. Sanskrit is full of third rated SEXUALLY PERVERTED mythological stories for Lord Shiva, Indra, Ayyappa and for lots of Rishis. You can not find one such sexually perverted literature in Tamil. Sanskrit is full of Racial Abuse and Racial discrimination based on birth like Manusimriti. You wont find any such discrimination in Tamil literature
    Thiruvalluvar in Thiru Kural says all Living Things are equal [Not just humans] (பிறப்பொக்கும் எல்லா உயிர்க்கும் சிறப்பொவ்வா செய்தொழில் வேற்றுமை யான் - திருக்குறள் 972). But in Sanskrit Manusmriti, manu discriminate people based on birth called Varna, Manusimriti is full of Racial Abuse and Racial discrimination based on birth.
    Tamils have the culture of worshiping there fore fathers that is how they are worshiping Siva, Thiru Maal [Vishnu] & Murugan [Subramanian]. Aryan Brahmins stolen Tamil's gods and and inserted FULLY SEXUALLY PERVERTED STORIES in later days for our gods like Vishnu Purana, Shiva Purana, Skanda Purana ... etc Now some idiots are even saying Lord Shiva don't understand Tamil and so we have to worship him only in Sanskrit. Lord Siva himself is a Tamil
    Tamil too have Sanskrit words its due to Sanskrit became sole authority for Hinduism and for Tamil Gods also. By stealing Tamils gods Sanskrit started influencing Tamil by way Varnasrama by saying Brahmins are great and they are born from Brahmas head. You have to respect Brahmin and you have to allow them to worship your gods in their language Sanskrit.
    Google - Tamil and Australian aboriginal languages
    மார் சுபிகள் Marsupial is a A word found in Australian Aboriginals language for Kangaroo kids. Marsupial in Tamil means Breast Suckers, Small Kangaroo kids will grow inside Mother Kangaroos waist bag by sucking milk from its mothers breast. English language derived this word from Australian Aborginals language, This word is more than 10,000 years old it's a pure Tamil word.
    Archaeological experts all over the world says that Indus valley civilization is a Dravidian civilization, but here in India Sanghis says its a vedic civilization but they do NOT Have any proof for their claim.
    Indus script - Wikipedia
    The Russian scholar Yuri Knorozov suggested, based on computer analysis, a Dravidian language as the most likely candidate for the underlying language of the script.[40] Knorozov's suggestion was preceded by the work of Henry Heras, who also suggested several readings of signs based on a proto-Dravidian assumption. [41]
    Oldest available work in Sanskrit [Note it is only oral No written records] is Rig veda, it has been etymologically proved that there are many loaned Tamil words in Rig veda that proves the pre existence of Tamil during the period of Rig veda
    Substrata in the Vedic language - Wikipedia
    There are an estimated thirty to forty Dravidian loanwords in Vedic. [26] Those for which Dravidian etymologies are proposed by Zvelebil include कुलाय kulāya "nest", कुल्फ kulpha "ankle", दण्ड daṇḍa "stick", कूल kūla "slope", बिल bila "hollow", खल khala "threshing floor". [24]
    Written By - Sampath Kumar Natarajan

  • @ewanb2819
    @ewanb2819 5 лет назад

    had the invasion not ocurred, the indhus river would have not dried up and been brought on course closer to Persia, as it has geographically. The Aryans came from Persia. They also stole a lot from the original people of what we call "India". Sanskrit & Hindi are related to Cueniform. You think they would willfully impose a class system upon themselves when they had a perfectly sufficient system already? They spoke a bastardized language & worshipped "Gods", a notion that wasn't universal until Zoro-Astrianism & the Roman Pantheon of Gods spread itself through conquership. Historically, these conquerers have branded their captors both by language & Religion: Example: English & England, of Britianium & Londinium, the Roman Colony Practicing Christianity. And why does Jerusalem influence heavily the culture of England Germania? Exactly, it doesn't belong, it is a product of invasion, just like India.

  • @KannapiranArjunan-vm2rq
    @KannapiranArjunan-vm2rq 5 лет назад +1

    RIG VEDA PROVIDED EVIDENCE OF ARYAN INVASION . In the Vedic literature, Indra is a heroic god. In early religious texts, Indra plays a variety of roles. As king, he leads cattle raids against the dasas, or dasyus(dravidian) native inhabitants of the lands over which his people range. He brings rain as god of the thunderbolt, and he is the great warrior who conquers the anti-gods (asuras). He also defeats innumerable human and superhuman enemies, most famously the dragon Vritra, a leader of the dasas (dravidian) and a demon of drought. ARE YOU GUYS ANTIVEDIC ?
    1. Sanskrit was not there in 300BC ASHOKA INSCRIPTION ( ASI GOI). ASI CARBONDARED TAMIL SCRIPT OF 900BC in many places (3000 years). THE SANSKRIT INSCRIPTION WERE CARBONDATED AS 400 Ad i.e. 1700yrs back.
    2. Sanskrit don't have a script till date ( may be san script language...meaning no script). It borrowed DRAVIDIAN Nagars script "Nagari" and changed the name as " devanagari". 3. On genetics, you demonstrated you are a novice or a blatant liar..India was invaded by so many races ....Aryans, iranian (Aryan too) kushans, greek, Turks. Arabs and so on and their genes are here in india. Genetists classified Indian gene pool as a mixture of dravidian and aryans...Most indians maternal genes are dravidian and for some paternal genes aryans. Do not jump half the length of a well..jump full length to save yourself... Aryan migration is true. Genetic research basis Y DNA (Male DNA) says so. Earlier researches were based on mtDNA(transferred from mother to Daughter) leading to conclusion that there is little or no external infusion in the male gene pool. The current research disproves the earlier theory, which had its base wrongly calculated by disregarding Y DNA data which has a strong presence, as evidenced by the recently concluded research, in the Indian Lineage. Y DNA research is important as the migrants had a strong gender bias - in other words they were predominantly Male.
    Do not bluff here with collection of convenient facts with hindutuva agenda..Western Historian accept that Indus was oldest but not accept Aryans are Indus people but dravidian. But you guys are trying to fool around without evidence.

  • @ExJewAntiKhazarWesternAsian
    @ExJewAntiKhazarWesternAsian 5 лет назад +1

    The Aryan invadors/migrant to India were not Europeans, but Proto-Kurdish people of West-Asia. In this regard, there is a lot of evidences. The problem with Europeans, is that they present everything as their own, if not or refuted- it didn't exist at all.

    • @nonamenn6246
      @nonamenn6246 5 лет назад +3

      You are funny

    • @theanonymous7584
      @theanonymous7584 5 лет назад +1

      Nope

    • @happybiswas9904
      @happybiswas9904 5 лет назад

      If don't have any ancient dna which can prove your theory then atleast keep your mouth shut you😑

    • @ExJewAntiKhazarWesternAsian
      @ExJewAntiKhazarWesternAsian 5 лет назад

      I corrected few spelling/typing errors. (*pro- proto). Sorry. Of course there are evidences I cannot enter this huge topic here, but suggest others to investigate themselves, while cautious in the biased Eurocentric matterials.

    • @theanonymous7584
      @theanonymous7584 5 лет назад +1

      @@ExJewAntiKhazarWesternAsian give any citation