Roger Penrose on Quantum Mechanics and Schrodinger's cat

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 4 янв 2011
  • Excerpt from Fashion, Faith and Fantasy in the New Physics of the Universe, Lecture 3: FANTASY @ Princeton University (2003-10-22)

Комментарии • 44

  • @wotcherfaz
    @wotcherfaz 10 лет назад +1

    Amazingly good slides - this is a gem of a talk.

  • @ReySyndicate
    @ReySyndicate 9 лет назад +4

    this man is such a great mind!

  • @MrKorrazonCold
    @MrKorrazonCold 11 лет назад

    "That's exactly what I imagine is happening!
    Energy is always in the future slightly beyond our perception of time, and really describes the potential to perform work.
    And when that work has been done +/- now we have the second law of thermodynamics as time unfolds."

  • @aqouby
    @aqouby 12 лет назад +2

    Roger Penrose is the boss. He makes his notes like a child though, lol. I mean, really, I checked out one of his fine books . . . My butt could make a better picture! But he's a genius and despite my fine art skills, at least he knows what he's talking about.

  • @MrKorrazonCold
    @MrKorrazonCold 11 лет назад

    Mind over matter.
    Atoms and particles are vibrating wave centres of opposed motion.
    E2 is forming a square of future probability as waves come from a distance radius.
    It is the locational spherical inward absorption density + and -outward emission density now of electromagnetic waves within objects relative to their own energy of mass that's forming all the forces of nature forming + and -electric charge and EM-fields or resonance and interference as time unfolds dividing gravity at right-angles

  • @Contango1000
    @Contango1000 9 лет назад +1

    I think R, as a symbol for the barrier between quantum and classical physics, is very well chosen. It may represent the word Random, which I believe is the core of all debates! How can a system, ever produce randomness, if we believe in determinism? Even if we don't, this is the big question. Is it possible to make a true random generator? If so, then the world can be explained easily!

  • @daver1964
    @daver1964 11 лет назад +1

    Power point sends everyone to sleep. Also, Penrose is a thinker. Actually putting pen to paper , or pen to transparency is an exercise in thinking.
    You're welcome.

  • @stevehd111
    @stevehd111 11 лет назад +1

    Quantum Mechanics 101: You just read this and you also didn't just read this at the same time.

  • @webcamsociety
    @webcamsociety 11 лет назад

    Schrodinger's cat I learnt about from Big Bang and google'd it and came here. Not what I expected!

  • @elijahmckeown6583
    @elijahmckeown6583 12 лет назад

    very good explanation

  • @elijahmckeown6583
    @elijahmckeown6583 12 лет назад

    it was well sorted out. now watch it for 10 more years and you might then comprehend it

  • @Dyslexic-Artist-Theory-on-Time
    @Dyslexic-Artist-Theory-on-Time 11 лет назад

    Interesting video!
    This is an invitation to see an artist theory on the physics of light and time!
    This theory is based on just two postulates
    1. Is that the quantum wave particle function Ψ or probability function represents the forward passage of time itself
    2. Is that Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle ∆×∆p×≥h/4π that is formed by the w-function is the same uncertainty we have with any future event within our own ref-frame that we can interact with turning the possible into the actual!

  • @RelatedGiraffe
    @RelatedGiraffe 12 лет назад

    I think you wrote that in superposition to writing that you could only see the Powerpoint slides.

  • @schmetterling4477
    @schmetterling4477 2 года назад

    It's kind of sad to see Penrose in such a state of confusion.

  • @MrKorrazonCold
    @MrKorrazonCold 11 лет назад

    Compression is life +/- expansion is death.
    We have to compress energy within our minds and bodies 4pi like rain falling from the sky, the drew drops slip back into the shinny sea, multiplying electrical potential within me.
    Energy resonance is always in the future slightly beyond our perception of time, and really describes the potential to perform work.
    And, once that work has been done +/- now we have the second law of thermodynamics as time unfolds C2 forming an inward force called gravity.

  • @Dyslexic-Artist-Theory-on-Time
    @Dyslexic-Artist-Theory-on-Time 11 лет назад

    Could Schrodinger’s Cat as a group of atom collapses’ its own wave function forming a future relative to the energy and momentum of its own actions?
    With QM representing the physics of ‘time’ as a physical process with the future coming into existence photon by photon
    Quantum uncertainty is the same uncertainty we have with any future event within our own ref-frame. The wave-particle duality of light is forming a blank canvas that we can interact with turning the possible into the actual!

  • @jesusbastardo9728
    @jesusbastardo9728 10 лет назад

    For me was a good explanation about our little avandce in our kowlege of universe

  • @anthead7405
    @anthead7405 2 года назад +1

    Penrose himself is not of less calibre than Dirac

  • @phumgwatenagala6606
    @phumgwatenagala6606 3 года назад

    Does anyone know where I can view the full lecture?

  • @krshna77
    @krshna77 12 лет назад

    However, I suspect that he used Powerpoint all the time, in superposition with the old fashion transparencies -- it's only me, as an observer, that could not see the powerpoint.

  • @RelatedGiraffe
    @RelatedGiraffe 12 лет назад

    Classic Dirac quotes!

  • @masterofsynapsis
    @masterofsynapsis 11 лет назад

    Schrödinger's cat walks into a bar... and doesn't.

  • @1simonmatthews
    @1simonmatthews 12 лет назад

    Penrose is a brilliant man, but nobody actually has any clue as to how anything exists, though I do agree, his zero is probably a whole lot higher than my zero.

  • @ThinkTank255
    @ThinkTank255 12 лет назад

    I am a pi meson? Would that make you a quark or a gluon?

  • @andrewwells6323
    @andrewwells6323 12 лет назад

    Huh?
    What did he say? What should he have said?

  • @andrewwells6323
    @andrewwells6323 12 лет назад

    What was wrong with what he said?

  • @Yuzukhane
    @Yuzukhane 7 лет назад

    I envy his intelligence

  • @rodrigowfranco
    @rodrigowfranco 11 лет назад

    and you sir, did said that..... and didn't.

  • @RamismTamoid
    @RamismTamoid 11 лет назад

    Well powerpoint slides both exist and do not exist, also neither exist nor do not exist. So he both does and does not use powerpoint slides; the materials are still all powerpoint slides and not powerpoint slides....and so on...its quite simple ...really....QED.

  • @stevehd111
    @stevehd111 11 лет назад

    And there is no difference in red or read.

  • @elijahmckeown6583
    @elijahmckeown6583 12 лет назад

    he's got a much better clue than you.

  • @ThinkTank255
    @ThinkTank255 12 лет назад

    Wow, it is sad that Penrose does not understand MWI. He said something like, "Perception states aren't allowed to be this [a superposition], and you are only allowed to perceive one or the other." That's not what MWI says at all. MWI says that they are SEPARATE universes, due to decoherence, and therefore, since consciousness is a CLASSICAL phenomenon of neuron firing (and NOT a QUANTUM phenomenon) a person in each universe can only experience themselves. He is WAY overcomplicating it.

  • @zacharycat
    @zacharycat 12 лет назад

    I am outraged and strongly opposed to this mistreatment! Cats make great companions, especially for people who admire independence in their pets. If you do not want to care for the animal there are no-kill shelters which do their best to find loving homes for these fine animals.

  • @krshna77
    @krshna77 12 лет назад

    This guy should learn how to use Powerpoint. Or find a student who knows that for him...

  • @1simonmatthews
    @1simonmatthews 12 лет назад

    Penrose has about as much of a clue why anything exists as I do - which is no clue. Lets's face it, no one has a clue.

  • @ThinkTank255
    @ThinkTank255 12 лет назад

    And he says earlier in the talk something like "That funny symbol is called modulus squared." How old is this guy? He is giving this talk like he is 102 years old. This is considered VERY basic mathematics these days.

  • @YoutubSUCKZ
    @YoutubSUCKZ 12 лет назад

    why does this dude use transparencies that is 100 years old technology what's wrong with preparing some powerpoint slides he wastes most of the time figuring out how to put the silly sheets on the projector lol

  • @yummyyummy123
    @yummyyummy123 12 лет назад

    he might be a great man in physics, but he cannot teach