The almost universal ignorance of what happens when someone collects photons (tiny particles of light energy or electromagnetic radiation) is responsible for so many claims of privacy invasion and aggression. No one, or their equipment, 'takes' someone's photo or image. They simply capture the photons bouncing off the object. The human eye (when in optimum condition) does this millions of times per second. We look at other people, and other people look at us, collecting reflected light energy. If you don't want anyone catching light reflecting off your body or property, you must shroud yourself and property in dark matter that will absorb the light rather than reflect it - almost an impossibility.
They did nothing wrong. Taking pictures of clothed body parts in a public place is perfectly ok and legal. If you have a problem with it, conceal those body parts while in public.
“We’re not just woMAN, we’re also children”. I’m willing to give her the error in English, her first big interview and all. But there’s also the fact the statement doesn’t even make sense… 🤔
I don’t know. This seems like typical young male behavior. You’d have to charge most every teenager in the country for rating their classmates behind their back. Maybe we should just get rid of teenage boys all together and lock them lock them all in prison? Theyre all underage so how is it child porn? So now if an underage boy kisses an underage girl they should go be expelled and idk have charges pressed? They were clothed and in public for anyone literally ANYONE to see. They did not break into their home and take photos of them changing.
Oh Evelyn, your argument to justify this is ridiculous & seriously uninformed! FB was created to rate FACE pics of ADULT college women, found in student directory. Even then it wasn't ok. It caused outrage & got Zuckerberg in trouble legally & with Harvard. This situation is about INAPPROPRIATE pics of MINOR GIRLS, taken without their knowledge or CONSENT. "Now it's not ok???" That makes zero sense since they're totally different situations, neither ever being ok.
Charges for what? Sounds like pictures all came from public hangouts. Back when i was in school there was houndreds of embarrassing pictures of me and all my friends. Not one person charged for the pictures. How about dont wear or do things you dont want a picture of. No expectation of privacy in public. So unless you can prove 1 that the girls didnt just get butt hurt after saying go ahead, 2 once again like me and everyone else has asked what charges would be filed here and 3 teach your girls to be proper little ladies just like you expect all boys to be perfect little gentleman. I think everyone is excited to see your response.
Depending on the state, for minors, when "the photo or video is used for sexual or predatory purposes, this could violate child pornography laws." Men here are really showing themselves by getting so hurt over suggesting legal action against ppl taking nonconsensual pics of teenage girls butts. They're taking it real personal for a reason. YIKES ON BIKES! I worry for young girls around these pervs.
@@Ballme60Depending on the state, for MINORS, when "the photo or video is used for sexual or predatory purposes, this could violate child pornography laws."
No condoning it, but I bet the boys could have gone to the girls Facebook and instagram pages for better pictures. And in the meantime the media is pushing for drag queens to dance in skimpy clothes for kindergarteners.
This is a situation SOCIETY has created for kids. It’s not anyone of the kids faulty, directly, to be perfectly honest. I know that will rile people up. But the harsh truth so often does..
In an article I read, it said that the photo's were not taken on school property and none of the photo's show any women unclothed. Having that info, there is no expectation of privacy in public and anyone can take a picture of anyone else in public without their consent. Was it morally correct, probably not. Was it legal, I believe so.
@@ParticipationTrophyWife1 You have no clue what you are talking about. You need to educate yourself on the constitutions. The pictures in question, are all of clothed females in public, so if you construed that to be "child pornography" then the females in question should be charged with "Indecent Exposure". FACT: There is NO expectation of privacy in public! Anyone can take anyones picture in public no matter what age without their consent. Now, you can go back and try and think of some other realistic idea!
@@ParticipationTrophyWife1 you realize thats only if an adult takes and possess those photos for that reason not someone their same age! Second it was pictures of them in swimsuits at the beach or skimpy shirts and skirts they had on in town. Dress appropriately if you dont want pictures taken of you.
They should go onto a registry list, their Parents should be reflected upon, as their computers probably have the photos somewhere for editing into card-format, as well as the phones used to obtain them.
A registry list? This is pretty normal teenage boy behavior. I mean I’m speechless that people don’t realize this? It doesn’t make it right but to out them on a registry list so that they can’t even have their own kids one day when they become an adult? Wow……. Let he who is without sin cast the first stone
😂 you do know the trading cards comment was just the girls talking right? The only physical evidence was the snapchat shit. They havnt found any evidence of trading cards and only heard about them the first day by like 4 students. Clearly people here are still in high school or forgot what it was like. Grow up.
They are freshmen and sophomores in HS taking photos of their same age peers. The situation deserves adult intervention, but not more permanent harm to the boys' lives like a registry or expulsion. Honestly, this is fairly "normal" teenage boy behavior and most will probably grow up to be decent men.
It's embarrassing how many ppl think they're defending these boys by saying: "teenage boys have always been allowed to get away with doing horrible stuff like this." It's not the defense they think it is. All they're doing is admitting they know it's wrong & pointing out it's been allowed to go on forever. This is a defense for why it needs to stop now, not for why it should be allowed to continue.
@@ew2755"Boys will be boys" right! I don't get it either. Ppl need to realize being young + having a penis automatically means you're allowed to do whatever u want, makes u immune to consequences, expectations & rules ppl w/o a penis have to follow & makes u totally incapable of learning bcuz you're a total idiot. Normal teen boy stuff! I'm also speechless over silly ppl suggesting their parents actually parent & teach their son's right & wrong. They've never had to before, so starting now is impossible. Change isn't even a thing. Girls need to just deal with it for eternity bcuz boys & their parents are special, not girls. 🙄
Lol murderers don't get 20 years, obviously taking "secret photos" is F'd up, but let's at least find out what's on the photos before throwing their lives away
The almost universal ignorance of what happens when someone collects photons (tiny particles of light energy or electromagnetic radiation) is responsible for so many claims of privacy invasion and aggression. No one, or their equipment, 'takes' someone's photo or image. They simply capture the photons bouncing off the object. The human eye (when in optimum condition) does this millions of times per second. We look at other people, and other people look at us, collecting reflected light energy. If you don't want anyone catching light reflecting off your body or property, you must shroud yourself and property in dark matter that will absorb the light rather than reflect it - almost an impossibility.
They did nothing wrong. Taking pictures of clothed body parts in a public place is perfectly ok and legal. If you have a problem with it, conceal those body parts while in public.
Glad to see normal boys. Not that I would condone their actions, BUT they are not trans or any of the other bull crap.
You can’t be both a woman and a child love.. I know it’s likely your first national interview, but that’s a pretty massive contradiction & misnomer.
“We’re not just woMAN, we’re also children”. I’m willing to give her the error in English, her first big interview and all. But there’s also the fact the statement doesn’t even make sense… 🤔
Did they have attack/def ratings and a Resource cost?
Great job parents who are raising misogynist a-holes ...instead of respectful human beings !! They should be suspended immediately !!
For breaking no laws??
@@Ballme60 no for being inappropriate and trading photos of child porn
@@pindlelou Not child porn. All females were clothed. Go read the article again!
I don’t know. This seems like typical young male behavior. You’d have to charge most every teenager in the country for rating their classmates behind their back. Maybe we should just get rid of teenage boys all together and lock them lock them all in prison?
Theyre all underage so how is it child porn? So now if an underage boy kisses an underage girl they should go be expelled and idk have charges pressed?
They were clothed and in public for anyone literally ANYONE to see. They did not break into their home and take photos of them changing.
Still deserves suspension for school code of conduct issues.@@Ballme60
So this is how FACEBOOK was created! now it's not ok???
Oh Evelyn, your argument to justify this is ridiculous & seriously uninformed! FB was created to rate FACE pics of ADULT college women, found in student directory. Even then it wasn't ok. It caused outrage & got Zuckerberg in trouble legally & with Harvard. This situation is about INAPPROPRIATE pics of MINOR GIRLS, taken without their knowledge or CONSENT. "Now it's not ok???" That makes zero sense since they're totally different situations, neither ever being ok.
classic bedford kids so spoiled lmao
Show and tell on a different level 😏
Uuummm, anyone ever heard about how Facebook was started ?
The gym teacher paid them to do it
Go smoke another one!!
In high school and already total weirdos…their parents must be proud !
You've very obviously never been around a 7th grade boy
Omg. Charges need to be pressed, in addition to expulsion.
Charges for what??
Charges for what? Sounds like pictures all came from public hangouts. Back when i was in school there was houndreds of embarrassing pictures of me and all my friends. Not one person charged for the pictures. How about dont wear or do things you dont want a picture of. No expectation of privacy in public. So unless you can prove 1 that the girls didnt just get butt hurt after saying go ahead, 2 once again like me and everyone else has asked what charges would be filed here and 3 teach your girls to be proper little ladies just like you expect all boys to be perfect little gentleman. I think everyone is excited to see your response.
You have to be kidding! Wish I was that good looking to be on a trading card.
Depending on the state, for minors, when "the photo or video is used for sexual or predatory purposes, this could violate child pornography laws." Men here are really showing themselves by getting so hurt over suggesting legal action against ppl taking nonconsensual pics of teenage girls butts. They're taking it real personal for a reason. YIKES ON BIKES! I worry for young girls around these pervs.
@@Ballme60Depending on the state, for MINORS, when "the photo or video is used for sexual or predatory purposes, this could violate child pornography laws."
No condoning it, but I bet the boys could have gone to the girls Facebook and instagram pages for better pictures. And in the meantime the media is pushing for drag queens to dance in skimpy clothes for kindergarteners.
Wish I was that good looking to be considered for a trading card.
This is a situation SOCIETY has created for kids. It’s not anyone of the kids faulty, directly, to be perfectly honest. I know that will rile people up. But the harsh truth so often does..
That’s why I disagree with expulsion, reformation is the better word.
In an article I read, it said that the photo's were not taken on school property and none of the photo's show any women unclothed. Having that info, there is no expectation of privacy in public and anyone can take a picture of anyone else in public without their consent. Was it morally correct, probably not. Was it legal, I believe so.
Depending on the state, taking pics of minors in public can be considered child pornography if taken for "sexual purposes."
@@ParticipationTrophyWife1 You have no clue what you are talking about. You need to educate yourself on the constitutions. The pictures in question, are all of clothed females in public, so if you construed that to be "child pornography" then the females in question should be charged with "Indecent Exposure". FACT: There is NO expectation of privacy in public! Anyone can take anyones picture in public no matter what age without their consent. Now, you can go back and try and think of some other realistic idea!
@@ParticipationTrophyWife1 you realize thats only if an adult takes and possess those photos for that reason not someone their same age! Second it was pictures of them in swimsuits at the beach or skimpy shirts and skirts they had on in town. Dress appropriately if you dont want pictures taken of you.
In NH it’s illegal to take pictures of any minor without consent
@@wolfkiller5451 first not if its a minor taking pictures second not if your in a public area
They should go onto a registry list, their Parents should be reflected upon, as their computers probably have the photos somewhere for editing into card-format, as well as the phones used to obtain them.
A registry list? This is pretty normal teenage boy behavior. I mean I’m speechless that people don’t realize this?
It doesn’t make it right but to out them on a registry list so that they can’t even have their own kids one day when they become an adult?
Wow……. Let he who is without sin cast the first stone
😂 you do know the trading cards comment was just the girls talking right? The only physical evidence was the snapchat shit. They havnt found any evidence of trading cards and only heard about them the first day by like 4 students. Clearly people here are still in high school or forgot what it was like. Grow up.
They are freshmen and sophomores in HS taking photos of their same age peers. The situation deserves adult intervention, but not more permanent harm to the boys' lives like a registry or expulsion. Honestly, this is fairly "normal" teenage boy behavior and most will probably grow up to be decent men.
It's embarrassing how many ppl think they're defending these boys by saying: "teenage boys have always been allowed to get away with doing horrible stuff like this." It's not the defense they think it is. All they're doing is admitting they know it's wrong & pointing out it's been allowed to go on forever. This is a defense for why it needs to stop now, not for why it should be allowed to continue.
@@ew2755"Boys will be boys" right! I don't get it either. Ppl need to realize being young + having a penis automatically means you're allowed to do whatever u want, makes u immune to consequences, expectations & rules ppl w/o a penis have to follow & makes u totally incapable of learning bcuz you're a total idiot. Normal teen boy stuff! I'm also speechless over silly ppl suggesting their parents actually parent & teach their son's right & wrong. They've never had to before, so starting now is impossible. Change isn't even a thing. Girls need to just deal with it for eternity bcuz boys & their parents are special, not girls. 🙄
Give them 20 years
Lol murderers don't get 20 years, obviously taking "secret photos" is F'd up, but let's at least find out what's on the photos before throwing their lives away
@@ghostwalk2446exactly
overly dramatic
For what?? Legal activity!!
Indecent exposure i guess. 😂😂😂