Plane Enters No Fly Zone
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 3 ноя 2022
- Enjoy this episode of 3 Minutes of Aviation!
✈ SOURCES / FURTHER INFORMATION
Fighter jet intercepting passenger plane
Video by Armad S.
Avianca Airbus A320 hard landing and go around
• Incident: Avianca A320...
Wizz Air Airbus A321 low pass over Budapest
• WizzAir low pass Nagyf...
DC-3 suffering engine failure before landing
• Dc-3 Engine Failure
USAF C-17 Globemaster using reverser to push back
• Boeing C-17 pushing ba...
✈ BECOME PART OF THE CHANNEL
Merch Store - teespring.com/stores/3-minute...
✈ CONTACT ME
Submit videos, give feedback, ask questions - 3minutesofaviation@gmail.com
If you liked the video, please subscribe and turn on notifications - I appreciate it! 
Наука
So it didn't enter a no-fly zone, it was a training mission on how to intercept.
That T-2 pilot needs to clean his cockpit window !
Yeah there’s been a few click baity titles recently 🤔
@@chriskeentechnician I'll never forgive them for "Wing falls off" - totally unnecessary, and when they get this ridiculous, people won't even watch. I hope it stops.
Agreed.
@@chriskeentechnician Probably cause someone new is in charge of coming up with titles.
I can't believe the DC3 is still flying, it's almost 80 years old!
Such failures were common. Once a passenger alerted the pilot that an engine was leaking oil, the pilot peeked at it and said "Good!, it means that we still have some!"
One of the greatest planes ever built.
Sure there wasn't a british motorcycle powering the turbine?
In Switzerland, We Have one
They still use them to deliver stuff to remote places in South America.
@@bigredc222 And even with in the arctic circle if I'm not mistaken?
"Luckily, the pilot manages to continue the approach and performs a safe landing"
Yup, the more we train, the luckier we get 😁
Yep. I was going to say "skillfully" rather than "luckily..."
not too mention its a DC-3... the other engine could have fallen off with half the tail.... and likely would have landed fine. 😛
lol yep not a pilot but I told my monitor not to worry cos an engine out on final is usually a yawn for a trained pilot.
Yea, using "lucky" is an insult to the pilots skills, abilities, training, and education. Poor choice of words.
Yeah was about to say, performing an engine out landing isn't something luck carries you through. It's all skill and no luck.
No Aerosucre this week? What an achievement!
Avianca was doing business like Aerosucre with that almost landing. Then again, Aerosucre would have continued the landing, I think.
No aerosucre, but Colombia still made it on the list
@@fluffigverbimmelt I was about to comment that hahahaha
Next week there will be 4
@@jonathonjankovich2362 I'm amazed they didn't bend the aeroplane with that landing.
The fighter plane really needs a good window cleaning.
A good crew chief would take care of that. Unless it’s permanently scarred and a work order is already in.
It looks like it may have been scraped by a helmet and the paint transferred.
Look like a mig 23, I'm not really surprised to see a canopy in this state
@@jvgrunt7898, I believe they come like that directly from the MiG factory. 😄
@@Chilly_Billy tosser
That Avianca pilot is never going to get a job at Ryanair if he continues to land that softly lol!
With Ryanair you wouldn't have enough fuel for a go-around. He definitely failed the job application :p
He's really practicing for Aerosucre.
I've flown with Avianca for most of my life, their landings are never soft. Not as hard as Ryanair but definitely not soft.
@3:01 with the C-17, you could almost hear the "BEAP BEAP BEAP BEAP" as it was backing up, but the engine noise drowned it out !
:)
It'd be scary as shit to be a wing walker on that bad boy, you can almost see the massive suction zones in front of those big ass engines
Where
Reminds me of my last flight in an aircraft - it was a DC3! 🙂
(First ever flight was a Bristol Superfreighter).
Thank you for sharing! 😀
Was that really a DC-3? If so, it's such an old plane! It was introduced in 1935 with the last ones built in 1950, so this plane is 72 to 87 years old!
@@desmond-hawkins There are lots of DC-3s still flying. :)
@@vk2ig this plane instantly recalls the Indiana Jones movies for me, there's a DC-3 flight montage in Raiders of the Lost Ark, which is from 1981. We're now over 40 years later and I don't know if I'd want to fly in an 80 year-old plane with absolutely none of the safety features that have been developed since…
The problem with a DC3 landing on one engine is that it can’t taxi off the runway, they just spin around in a circle on only the one engine.
One landed at Manchester a year or so ago & was stuck on the runway until they could get a tow vehicle to pull it from it’s tail wheel.
Is this because of limited wheel steering or something else?
@@tehguitarque I'd have to imagine the tail wheel is just a caster (rotates freely) and the aircraft uses differential braking on the main gear wheels for the actual steering
@@zBrainlezz That makes sense
@@skopa1223 It can’t be towed from the front because of the landing gear layout, so yes it would likely steer while under power by differential in engine thrust (I suppose by changing propeller pitch).
Split Throttle and differential braking - son of dc3 pilot
at 2:00, the casual "that's not good..." got me rolling. I would be losing my sh//t in that position
"This is a radial aircraft engine: you won't be working on these." - Every subsequent DC-3 and DC-6 mechanic remembers that day in class.
I hate to fly, but I love three minutes of aviation every few days.
Wait why do you hate flying?
I like flying but I hate airports
@@MeethaMadina1263 I don't like being compressed like a sardine with hundreds of strangers in a tin can hurtling through the air at 30,000 feet and 500 mph.
@RookieTheRooks I think you're right. I hate being a passenger. One time my ex bought me a pilot lesson for my birthday, and it was one of the most fun things I ever did.
@@rinusvandeven I don't mind the flying part of travelling by airplane, but the messing about - especially at the departure end - is a pain. If they could streamline that part of the trip I'd be a lot happier ... although part of the problem is people having next to no brains and holding up everyone else (especially in security queues) due to sheer stupidity or lack of thought about others.
Love 3 minutes of aviation
Breakfast and 3 minutes of awesome to start the morning.
FO: There’s no tug available for pushback.
Capt: Pfft.
In that DC3: not by luck did they land. By proper training and pilot skill.
Luckily they were trained
I really look forward to these video's thanks for posting them.
0:55 Softest landing when flying with Ryanair
That DC-3 would've been fine to fly another 500 miles 😂 Great plane! Great video!
Great video!
Excellent !!!!!
I didn't know Ryanair goes to Columbia now
Colombia* :)
Good video.
The first clip of that military jet canopy is a disgrace. They should never be that scratched up and unpolished. Shows the level of care they put into those jets. Sad.
Who do they belong to?
Who were the people in the plane that came into the "No fly zone"?
Thanks.
@@veramae4098 From the context, I think it was a Libyan MiG-23 performing a training interception. (The Context being that the civilian aircraft was Libyan, the aircraft was a MiG-23, a type that the Libyan Air Force operates, and it said that it was a training interception).
Good catch. And good posture note that the USAF rules the skies
One of your best videos. Keep doing them like this. Luckily noone was injured.
Saludos desde Zapopan México ✌
Hello
Fastest 3 minutes on YT :)
DC3, best airplane to be build.
Loved the B I G thing reversing!!!
Bob
England
C-17 is Magnificent!
If you ever miss the dc10 just look at the nose of the c_17 it,s the same nose as the dc10
thank you
Nobody beats the Wizz!
*EXCELLENT*
When a DC-3 pilot continues for a safe landing after an engine failure, the word "Luckily" shouldn't be used.
That's skill and experience.
Well Done!
One of the few planes you want to be in when your right engine failed … the DC 3 … a beast.
Those guys in the globemaster were showing off. I saw a G4 do that in ACK. Also saw a pilot regularly back in his King Air 350.
Engine fails on final approach: *giggles* "that's not good!"
Go up more
Your channel is nice
Fantasti!
Eastern Airlines used to do the same type of backing up as did the C-17. They would use the reverse thrusters to back out of a gate, at least in ATL. I guess it saved a few ground crew. I was always concerned they didn’t see anything behind them.
Backup camera.
Our pilots were not permitted to do it in DC-9s - they were concerned about ingesting debris. But that didn't mean they didn't do it - I was on a compass swing in a '9 one day when the pilots ran out of manoeuvring room and backed up using the thrust reversers. I've also seen pilots do it in Twin Otters, which had a small amount of reverse pitch on the propellers to achieve that.
I'm fairly sure the use of reverse thrust to push back from an airline gate has been prohibited since the late 1970s. Possible reasons might include concerns about debris getting kicked up and then sucked into the engines, and possibly also the amount of noise produced by doing it that way... Idk for sure
@@zBrainlezz not to mention the risk of injury to ground crew/damage to ground handling vehicles.
I watched a Northwest DC-9 or MD-80 do a power back. I was on a flight where they did it too I think lol
We flew AirTran Boeing 717’s out of Atlanta in early 2000’s. Reverse Thrusted out of gates every time! I loved that little plane, Rolls Royce engines. Held 4 hours in New Orleans because of storms. Pilot said board plane, reversed out of gate, rolled taxi, fast turn to runway, never reduced speed to Atl. Fastest Flight Ever!!!
Dank u
Ryanair pilots, "why didn't that Avianca pilot just drop it on the tarmac"
I saw a c-17A globelmaster III flying very low near my school
Wow wizzair
Ideal for referencing convergence. The more marks the better!
Was the Avianca flight in Honduras?
The window cleaning is the first thing I was going to say! That would be frustrating to fly like that
That A321 shxt is so gangster ✌️😎haha for real, that’s a bad ass pilot 🤘✌️
The first clip looks like something Airforceproud95 would do in FSX
Right there on the edge between go-around and touch-and-go, is this thing. Bounce-back? 🤣
"That's not good" Can confirm, you probably need those.
You certainly need at least one of them.
Was the second video ryan air?
The DC 3 is bullet proof, well not literally. But an engine failing as you are coming in to land and the pilot just sets it down. Would be interesting to see how many jets could manage that.
DC3 experts out there: was it good pilot feathering the prop quickly or is there auto feather on engine shutdown?
as far as I know, it needs to be feathered manually.
"Sink rate!" *WOOP WOOP* "Sink rate!" *WOOP WOOP*
*KA-BANG*
"W'ed like to thank you for flying Avianca."
Avianca Airbus A320. The sounds in the cockpit belike SINKRATE SINKRATE
When interecepting a civilian aircraft, it's better to approach on the pilot's side (left or port side), so he will honor the intercept and follow instructions.
I mean, it's the Libyan Air Force. Do you think they know and/or care?
@@prestonlee9965 Doesn't matter what they care, it's international procedure.
In the early 80's United went through a tough, long strike. To cut costs on the return to work, they did away with tugs is some airports and the planes used thrusters to back away from the gate. Wierd. Also, after the strike, each passenger received a coupon for a free flight upon boarding. Had a stack of them.
a procedure known as Power-Backing
Which became a thing of the past unless absolutely needed for civil aviation, but the military has no restrictions to this.
Need to ship the Egyptians some Windex.
Or the Libyans even
That trainers canopy is filthy. I think Windex is available worldwide.
Hi, the video regarding the interception . This happened in Libya during the w@r against I.S. back in 2017 , the fighter jet was enforcing a no fly zone set by the Libyan army. And it landed in Sebha airport south of Libya.
It was not a fight against i s, it was a regime change by the corrupt west sadly
care to cite this?
I found a few references to this being a training op, but none to it being a live event.
@@CapStar362 search the following senntence (it's in Arabic) in youtube it should be on top of the search result.
القوات الجوية تعترض طائرة مدنية اخترقت منطقة الحظر الجوي في الجنوب وتجبرها على الهبوط في مطار تمنهنت
Rough translation ( the airforce intercepted a civillian aircraft after violating nofly zone and force it to land on Timin Hent airport near Sebha city
@@billb7876 it is, i am Libyan and it happened during the w@r as i mentioned before.
@@user-nh2xe6sv8g i translated the entire description of said video:
Air Force operations .. Dignity operations
..
On Saturday, February 9, 2019, a Libyan Airlines CRJ plane landed at the helipad of the El Feel oil field despite the air ban announced by the Air Force Operations Room through various media outlets.. A NOTAM was also issued banning flights at various airports and airfields in the southern region due to military operations. The ongoing operation in the area... and after the aforementioned plane landed at the field's airfield, despite the presence of Libyan Air Force fighters in the area's space... but our fighters did not target them and fired warning shots in the desert near the airport... far from the airfield, far from the plane and far from the airport facilities. On board this plane was a medical crew in addition to the crew of the plane, Ali Kanna, who is hostile to the Libyan army..
On the following day, on Sunday, February 10, 2019, this plane took off while our fighters were in the region’s space.. The pilot was asked to go to Tamanhant Airport, escorting our Air Force fighters.. He actually went and landed at the airport.. Those on board the plane by the Dignity Operations Room and the Air Force Operations Room.. A press interview was held with those on board by the Military Information Division at the General Command.. Then the Commander in Chief, Field Marshal Khalifa Haftar, was instructed to allow the plane and those on board to leave for Tripoli and secure it. In the air, which is what actually happened.
There are a lot of errors in that compared to the official statement and report of said flight and said Libyan CRJ-900ER Tail Code 5A-LAM.
You seem to have missed doing some verification checking by using the registration of the aircraft itself.
Sorry, I don't fully believe the video description either after reading the OFFICIAL statement about that flight.
The Avianca A320 would make Ryanair proud
That c17 uses ptfs logics
What was the airline for the CRJ -900 at the starting?
libya
You Owe us 10 mins of aviation.
I’m early btw love your channel
@0:55 they just fist bumped the runway
Avianca: "That was a 'hard landing'!"
Ryanair: "Hold my pint of Guiness."
The CRJ-900ER is made by Bombardier in Canada.
1:53 so do props feather this quickly normally? I thought the feather was done after the engine was stopped. Or maybe it just looks like it's feathered...
There's a dedicated big red prop feather button in the DC3 exactly for circumstances like this: Even more problematic would be an engine out on takeoff
When doing preflight checks you test the feather while the engine is running so you can prove that it works, so I would guess the pilot already pulled the lever.
@@gtaxmods Oh, I didn't realize it could feather while running. I guess I figured the governor wouldn't react fast enough and the engine could overspeed. Thanks.
@@atubebuff Feathering would increase the load on the engine because the pitch is set to maximum coarse (i.e. as parallel to the airflow as possible, and perpendicular to the propeller "disk") to reduce the drag on that side of the aircraft due to the propeller.
(Conversely, setting the prop to flight fine (or even ground fine) flattens the pitch and thus produces maximum drag.)
@@vk2ig Thanks for this.
That low pass over Budapest city center = SUCH a bad idea.
What's the upside to that level of risk, exactly?!
Tourist income.
Finally found the plane and airways from FSX
0:55
Wait, ryanair has a320 and new livery?
Why did the gear come down in Budapest if it was a low pass for show?
They doing that in low speed, it change the aerodinamic, planes are engineered in a way they can go slower if the gear is down. At least this is what I heard.
1:15 *But your honor, he was listening to Free bird*
0:57 isnt that a Ryamar pilot that went to another comany?😅
So weird to call them "Mitsubishi CRJs" and not "Bombardier" anymore.
I call number 2 a very hard touch and go
@0:18- That "Fighter jet" groundcrew needs a weekend on-base learning how to do basic maintenance on a combat jet. That canopy is a God-Damned Disgrace!
Avianca had to do a go around as the gear didn't snap off at the first attempt.
2:25, every msfs beginner ever
"Luckily the pilot manages to continue..."
How about this instead? "Skillfully the pilot continues..."
0:46 pilot needed just one more landing for his 90 day currency
Single engine landings is what we all trained for. Shouldn't be a problem really.
Somebody needs to polish the canopy on that Mirage fighter. Not sure it’s a mirage, hard to tell.
I saw a small plane being escorted by 2 fighters. Bet they were shitting their pants.🤣🤣
Ummm, who built the CRJ-900ER? Mitsubishi is responsible for ending the CRJ, not building it. That is a Bombardier, just like all other CRJ's.
1:58 "...that's not good..." xD DC3s are the most common non-jet aircraft still in use, no?
If I've learned anything from these videos , don't fly in Columbia , walk.
C-17 could of done a u-turn there tbh
That plane just rebounded.
My paisans from Aerosucre they are the best south American pilots
0:50: Capping points using planes in War Thunder be like:
time for 1 million "FIRST" comments
Slam and go maneuver!
Wizzair clip is 5 years old
Boeing have to make 500-1000 new examples of DC-3 .
The most brand I've seen in like these videos are :
1 Douglas
2 Boeing