I noticed alot of people trivialize missle defense,it's not a trivial capacity it's something America and are allies truly believe in.and with ever increasing capacity to intercept icbms I believe it will have more than enough capability to stop a potential Russian or Chinese strike.are mkv in development that will be the ultimate game changer!
Our BMD capability is not meant to contain russia, MAD is still the strategy there. For China, I doubt we have enough ABMs to contain, but who knows. Thr BMD network is mostly to protect us from unpredictable rogue or radical nations such as North Korea and Iran
patriot and thaad is similar in a way that is land base. thaad can take down icbm but those are primary for close range within icbm launch. SM family is on par with S400+ family except that it has been tested to take on ICBM a few times and that show quality. it can also be used to target sea base ship if it need to but primary role is for air defense. its the core of air defense for all range targets. hit to kill missile is good but i think it need some big warhead on it. giving that ICBM can always adapted to change with decoy or different shape warhead making it undetected. a giant explosion would take a cluster of decoy and warhead in one swoop all together.
@Wayne Haile But until they put the extra fire control dish on the Hobart class and upgrade to Aegis baseline 9 or 10 they are limited. And we did hear future proofing a lot under the current government. Plus updated phalanx's. Have to one up the tight ass Europeans. 😂😂😂😂
Besides the skin color its clear what the difference is lol Russia hates the English language natives do to but we speak it we were forced to along with our hair being cut and more they the Russians got it bad to but do they know about native Americans idk but here's a little something for ya lol
The SM6 Block VI travels at Mach 3.5. That is a speed of .745 Miles per second. The target missiles they shot down did NOT simulate an attack by China's DF21 or DF26 Missiles. The spokesperson said that "ballistic missiles" were shot down in the tests. What he did NOT say is those missiles did not come from outside the atmosphere which is what The DF26 and DF21 missiles do. It is important to know that China's DF21 and DF26 actually escape the atmosphere enter space and then reenter the atmosphere. Raytheon cannot target the missile while in space and the ceiling of the SM6 Block VI is 110,000 feet. The terminal speed of an inbound DF26 is Mach 26 or 5.54 Miles a second compared with the .745 Miles per second speed of the SM6. From the detection time when the target enters the atmosphere to the intended target at an altitude of 110,000 feet, rounding off miles to 5,000 feet times 5 miles a second around 4.4 seconds for the DF26 warhead to hit it's target. If the defensive missile were launched when the target was detected at 110,000 feet at a rounded off speed of 1 Mile or 5,000 feet a second it would take the SM6 22 seconds to get to 110,000 feet. The SM6 will NOT stop a DF26 attack. Quit kidding yourselves Raytheon. My Father worked for ESL/TRW and Northrup Grumman. You have as much chance of stopping a DF 26 with the SM6 as I do shooting it down with a .22.
US has the capability to shoot down exo- atmospheric targets using the SM 3 missile. Multiple tests have been done. US can track the missile even in space and shoot it down using SM 3. If the incoming missile is in terminal phase then the SM 6 is used. The SM 6 missile is launched even before the incoming missile re-enters atmosphere. That way it does not have to be as fast as the incoming missile. You really don';t know how missile defense works. There is nothing special about df 21 or df 26
@@GowthamNatarajanAI hey i want to know if a sm3 or sm6 could defeat a rubezh rs26 or sarmat rs28 i want to know if sm 3 or 6 are more capable than s400 ,s500 and s600 if they actualice their missiles i have another doubt do they can track stealth targets and i also have another question sm3 or sm6 are the same class as s400 and s500
@@TheChimalhuacan SM 2, 3 and 6 can intercept any Hypersonic Ballistic missiles and supersonic cruise missiles at different stages. S400 is similar to SM 2 and 6 with SPY radar. S500 is similar to American THAAD system. S500 and THAAD are for intercepting ballistic missiles during terminal phase. They are not for shooting down aircrafts. Russia did not have a good anti ballistic missile system until they get S500.
@@TheChimalhuacan 235 is still in development. Even if the missile is developed, russia does not have a good detection system to detect launches far enough away to have a chance of intercepting. 135 is just a nuclear warhead. They are launching a nuke at an incoming missile so that they dont have to hit the missile to defeat it. But the nuke will also cause fallout in russia's own territory. So its not actually a anti-ballistic system.
I guess you prefer mind boggling Obama who tried to send over $200 million to the Middle East right before leaving office? Oh yeah, he was a real saint. Or how about W Bush who couldn't get a sentence right?
Наука
I noticed alot of people trivialize missle defense,it's not a trivial capacity it's something America and are allies truly believe in.and with ever increasing capacity to intercept icbms I believe it will have more than enough capability to stop a potential Russian or Chinese strike.are mkv in development that will be the ultimate game changer!
"Our" Allies
Our BMD capability is not meant to contain russia, MAD is still the strategy there. For China, I doubt we have enough ABMs to contain, but who knows. Thr BMD network is mostly to protect us from unpredictable rogue or radical nations such as North Korea and Iran
that's awesome
patriot and thaad is similar in a way that is land base. thaad can take down icbm but those are primary for close range within icbm launch. SM family is on par with S400+ family except that it has been tested to take on ICBM a few times and that show quality. it can also be used to target sea base ship if it need to but primary role is for air defense. its the core of air defense for all range targets.
hit to kill missile is good but i think it need some big warhead on it. giving that ICBM can always adapted to change with decoy or different shape warhead making it undetected. a giant explosion would take a cluster of decoy and warhead in one swoop all together.
Hope we upgrade the Hobart class so it can use these babies.
The sm6 has a great all around capability, and is great value for money.
@Wayne Haile
But until they put the extra fire control dish on the Hobart class and upgrade to Aegis baseline 9 or 10 they are limited.
And we did hear future proofing a lot under the current government.
Plus updated phalanx's.
Have to one up the tight ass Europeans.
😂😂😂😂
The US army needs to put sm6 missiles on mobile launchers and have something as capable as the s400
They already do
@@thunderwrld do they have sm6 mobile launcher'
Thaad extended range will be more effective in countering the Asian threat in the Pacific assuming accurate placement
definitely dont sell any to Turkey:)
@2:58 - Nice map showing Ukraine, including the Crimean peninsular, being covered by missile defence.
This has nothing to do with missiles but what's the difference between Russians and natives
A Russian would say mother Russia natives say mother earth lol
Besides the skin color its clear what the difference is lol Russia hates the English language natives do to but we speak it we were forced to along with our hair being cut and more they the Russians got it bad to but do they know about native Americans idk but here's a little something for ya lol
So many catchwords.
"There's no business like war!" The Worldwide MMM Association. (MMM = Mercenaries, Manufacturers, Morticians).
The SM6 Block VI travels at Mach 3.5. That is a speed of .745 Miles per second. The target missiles they shot down did NOT simulate an attack by China's DF21 or DF26 Missiles. The spokesperson said that "ballistic missiles" were shot down in the tests. What he did NOT say is those missiles did not come from outside the atmosphere which is what The DF26 and DF21 missiles do. It is important to know that China's DF21 and DF26 actually escape the atmosphere enter space and then reenter the atmosphere. Raytheon cannot target the missile while in space and the ceiling of the SM6 Block VI is 110,000 feet. The terminal speed of an inbound DF26 is Mach 26 or 5.54 Miles a second compared with the .745 Miles per second speed of the SM6. From the detection time when the target enters the atmosphere to the intended target at an altitude of 110,000 feet, rounding off miles to 5,000 feet times 5 miles a second around 4.4 seconds for the DF26 warhead to hit it's target. If the defensive missile were launched when the target was detected at 110,000 feet at a rounded off speed of 1 Mile or 5,000 feet a second it would take the SM6 22 seconds to get to 110,000 feet. The SM6 will NOT stop a DF26 attack. Quit kidding yourselves Raytheon. My Father worked for ESL/TRW and Northrup Grumman. You have as much chance of stopping a DF 26 with the SM6 as I do shooting it down with a .22.
US has the capability to shoot down exo- atmospheric targets using the SM 3 missile. Multiple tests have been done. US can track the missile even in space and shoot it down using SM 3. If the incoming missile is in terminal phase then the SM 6 is used. The SM 6 missile is launched even before the incoming missile re-enters atmosphere. That way it does not have to be as fast as the incoming missile. You really don';t know how missile defense works. There is nothing special about df 21 or df 26
@@GowthamNatarajanAI hey i want to know if a sm3 or sm6 could defeat a rubezh rs26 or sarmat rs28 i want to know if sm 3 or 6 are more capable than s400 ,s500 and s600 if they actualice their missiles i have another doubt do they can track stealth targets and i also have another question sm3 or sm6 are the same class as s400 and s500
@@TheChimalhuacan SM 2, 3 and 6 can intercept any Hypersonic Ballistic missiles and supersonic cruise missiles at different stages. S400 is similar to SM 2 and 6 with SPY radar. S500 is similar to American THAAD system. S500 and THAAD are for intercepting ballistic missiles during terminal phase. They are not for shooting down aircrafts. Russia did not have a good anti ballistic missile system until they get S500.
@@GowthamNatarajanAI And how about a135 and a 235
@@TheChimalhuacan 235 is still in development. Even if the missile is developed, russia does not have a good detection system to detect launches far enough away to have a chance of intercepting. 135 is just a nuclear warhead. They are launching a nuke at an incoming missile so that they dont have to hit the missile to defeat it. But the nuke will also cause fallout in russia's own territory. So its not actually a anti-ballistic system.
Turkey and USA the only capable NATO forces forget about Germany or France
Tur
it always boogle my mind that a country which has Donald Trump as a president could achieve something like this.
Heretic123456
You are not too bright there
I guess you prefer mind boggling Obama who tried to send over $200 million to the Middle East right before leaving office? Oh yeah, he was a real saint. Or how about W Bush who couldn't get a sentence right?
Where and when exactly did Obama try and send $200 million to the middle east?
@@jesser5127 I see you believe that LIE LOL FOOL
People only hate Trump because they've been programmed to.