This guy needs to redo this video the water he's using for battlefield is bugged and doesn't show ripples properly like orbitals as that area where the water is is basically out of bounds.
As a CoD fan, witnessing this franchise become on par with battlefield (especially older title) in terms of quality and detail really giving me a sense of joy i never knew could be possible for CoD
Honestly, both have pretty decent water physics. People in the comments kinda exaggerating. Battlefield holds up pretty well. But, a thing I can agree on, it's laughable how much better a beta of a cod game can do water physics than the game that had them first.
@@ramiere1412 yea man a game that was new when it was released and had uncountable bugs is better than a game who's beta is more polished then the released game...... Btw 2042 is recent not that old.....
@@ramiere1412 you are missing the point. Battlefield is a franchise that has previous experience with water physics, and cod is pretty new to it. So it's embarassing when COD has the better water physics. In addition to that, BF isn't that old. They also had a lot of time to polish. They just messed it up.
It’s a shame what happened to BF. They used to put so much effort into small details. The frostbite engine is capable of doing so much impressive stuff mainly destruction but 2042 barely has any. 2042 is a rushed mess that’s full of bad decisions. The most impressive thing about 2042 graphically is probably the dynamic weather/wind physics and storms… the tornados and sandstorms look amazing.
I'm honestly really impressed with the overall detail in MW2. The only that hurts my soul in that video about the CoD water is where it meets the shoreline. That stuff looks like mercury with some fake splashes thrown on top.
If the new Warzone is using the same engine (I assume it is) then I wonder if it has anything to do with their whole ecosystem with crossplatform on other devices like mobile. I only skimmed it so I'm vague on exact details but it sounded like they were trying to allow the same or similar experiences across devices, so I'm thinking maybe that shoreline is part of the downsides of it? Could be way off the mark and considering how good everything else looks it could be fixable and may already be fixed.
@@AXELVISSERS better and worse graphical detail in different places. It's interesting seeing where they go backwards on quality and improve in other places, almost seems random sometimes, but the focus differs in places they feel is more worthy I expect. Some texture work was amazing in mw19, where as it downfalls in mw22 and vice versa.
@@melcorchancla9431 pretty sure 2042 had less than 15 months of development they kept on restarting shame they didn’t use the 3 years at their fullest but still even tho mw2 is in a much better position it’s ground war mode still can’t top battlefield at battlefield it can have 64 players and large maps and vehicle combat what makes battlefield battlefield is it’s sand box gameplay and environments the 64 players and vehicles are the extra toppings like look at ww3 looks like battlefield but sure as shit don’t play like battlefield since it’s a lot more hardcore and strict
@@melcorchancla9431 honestly 2042 still does battlefield better than mw2 ground war since it’s a lot less strict and competitive and there’s more sandbox capabilities
If we discount destruction then MWII actually offers to me everything I ever wanted from a modern day Battlefield. Ground War and Invasion is good enough as is for the "mil-sim" lite I expect from both. Beautiful and polished graphics, perfectly gritty art style, wonderful attention to detail and atmosphere of modern warfare.. Battlefield looks so generic compared to it. Like a souless game without inspiration.
True. Just from the 2042 beta, I felt something was awfully off, as if it were the map and the overall look of the game seemed completely lifeless and had no inspiration. I thought that it'd be fine since it was a beta but after the launch of the full game, it was as if there were no changes made whatsoever. The map feels so lifeless, the environment seems so bland and the guns had a plastic like feel to it, it never felt like a battlefield. That's just my view and take on the game.
Not for me. It’s missing a class system, server browser, revive system, and (as mentioned above) destruction. Now that being said MWII Ground war is something special and I do think it tops battlefield 2042 for me
Honestly I thought that mw2 looked better, but after watching this vid 2042 actually does look better than mw2 (I know it's in beta) people just won't admit that cause of all the hate they got for 2042
@@DoggyPaws4 as a bf fan you are wrong battlefield 2042 is the worst game ever with mobile graphics i played the beta of cod mw2 its another level in everything from now on i will play only cod until bf make a good game realistic game like bf 3 and v with great graphics like mw2 .
@@davidsplooge14 You're right, battlefield 2042 is a piece of below average software. It doesn't compare to battlefield 5 graphically, doesn't carry a semblance of battlefield 1 atmosphere or style and nowhere near the gameplay of battlefield 4... By all means this is barely middle soft AA game let alone a AAA development, thanks for correcting me.
MWII also allows you to freely move around in a transport helicopter, an innovation that, as far as I can remember, BF has never allowed you to do. You can't even do it in 2042 without glitching inside the Condor/Hind.
@@magodejos5699 You know, it's funny you say "CoD fantard." Judging by your other comments on this video, you're just as fantarded about Battlefield lmao.
Honestly they both do different things better. In 2042, it interacts with the shore and the wetness of your weapon looks so much better, but in MW2 it’s interactability is much nicer. I like them both
@Uijnghhj definitely, anyone who hyped up a game that much deserves the disappointment lol I didn’t get the game at launch but I also am not going to compare it now to where it was at launch because that’s a pretty poor comparison
@@enjoi9970 bf is done now stop defending the game its funny cartoon game like a mobile game bf2042 now its time for mw2 btw im bf fan but the last game is sucks and funny seriously super hero specialists
I remember when mw2 beta on sariff bay map, me and few other player swimming underwater to suprise the shithead on the opposite island who keep knocking down our spawn area with 50.cal and sniper team lmao, best moment
Shoutout to Infinity Ward for being able to deliver new experiences in an FPS. Ground war DMZ War zone MP There’s gonna be so much to do, now they just need a competitive ranked mode
The only bad thing about the Call of duty game was that it took a long time to reload the weapon, and also if you are reloading the weapon and start running, it stops reloading the weapon
I'm a battlefield fan I'm joining the cod community now I played the beta and I'm very impressed with it ground war is the same as battlefield I been looking for a shooting game for a long time now I been playing bf3 again as I have been sick of playing bf4 for so long
Battlefield's (not just 2024; 1 and 5 as well) water ripples are too excessive. It makes the water feel less dense. Modern Warfare keeps ripples at a relatively realistic level. You can even see the minute ripples from the gun swooshing in the water surface. The only thing I hope CoD improves on is the water's contact with land or shore with some waves.
Is it bad that I didn’t know there was water in maps in bf2042 like that you can walk up to and jump in? I feel like this game variety In maps is a lot less then other battlefields like 3-4 with all the island hoping and just overall different maps worth this one I feel it’s just snow dessert and some civilized places not complaining just intrigued by it
There's very little water in the bf2042 maps. Manifest has water surrounding the playable area, Kaleidoscope has water at one edge of the map, Orbital has some water on one side of the playable map (but not in the shrunken gametypes), Exposure has a narrow stretch of water at the edge of the map (seen in this video), Discarded has a tiny bit of swimmable water at one edge, but no others in the base game have any noteworthy areas of water (unless I've missed one). Renewal could have had an event where water floods through the channels and into the basement of the main building, but I don't see it happening at this stage
Personally I think they should have gone further & had things like the sand react with the water.. so as the waves come in it makes the sand darker / wet effect..
I love how shooting water became a quality comparison thing lol. Like how often do you shoot water in fps games and be like "daaaaamn duuude that's rad quality right there"
I just wish I could see a BF and CoD crossover game at some point, where both devs would share their knowledge with each other and work on the parts that they are know for to be good at.
Since the MW2019 engine, imo COD has surpassed BF graphically. Even BF5’s player models, ADS views, and animations all started looking cartoony and strange (compared to BF1/4/3), and got even worse in 2042. But MW19 was just a freaking marvel to look at, and the animations/sounds, phew it is truly a masterpiece. Like what BF3 was to the world in 2012, MW19’s engine is that today.
MW2 looks fantastic. One of the few games I’ve seen where submerging looks good too. Far Cry 6 is the only other game I’ve seen do a great job when you submerge
Competition is good, and I think we might actually get an actual pretty looking and actually finished Battlefield in the next couple of years that won’t have the stupid quips in them. Modern warfare keeping their quality high, and have expanded( 3rd person mode is fucking great)to encompass a few different ways to play and with MW2022, it’s better than ever, hopefully EA will invest more in battlefield, it sounds like that maybe they might be doing just that 🤔✌️
I'm honestly ready to just give up the good old days of Battlefield and start mourning Battlefield 2, 3, and 4. EA obviously doesnt have the same quality of devs in their rotation anymore.
That was really good both those games have come a very long ways in my opinion and I got to say battlefield holding its own but cod man holy smokes to see it come that far in graphics and in water and in the physics it's so awesome
They've both got good water physics. Only issue I have is the transition from water to land in COD. Looks kinda bad honestly 😅 Other than that though they're both good
The comments are really exaggerated to be honest. Stop following the hate train. I expected worse but they both looked good actually. The only kinda odd thing is the water physics since BF had them long before COD but that's pretty much it. When you're actually playing, you barely ever use the water anyways
MWII is just better in every way for me personally. Sure destructible environment would be cool but at the same time BF only has a few preselected buildings that can be demolished. Some walls are destructible and some are indestructible. Gameplay MWII is insanely fun and BF isn’t even close imo. And I actually occasionally have fun with BF2042.
Just play BF4. Same thing, better map designs, and still a pretty big community. The vehicles, weapons, customization, camos, soldier lingo, and weather effects, especially level-ution, is still top tier. Just wish Dice or EA would open servers to make it cross platform.
Battlefield 2042 ain't really that bad, at first it was ridiculous but now they're slowly climbing up the ladder. However I'm not gonna even try to steal the credit from CoD with MW2. For a beta? Shit the game is beautiful in every aspect let's not forget the huge content they're bringing to the table as well. But people really need to stop comparing BF with CoF because it's a whole different experience in terms of gameplay and therefore they can't be compared. In my personal opinion i think BF will always be a step ahead of CoD that's how I've always seen it. BFV and BF1 had so much hate when they were first released and now they're one of the best games till this day, give it some time and BF 2042 will definitely hold it's title after the huge downfall.
I still think bf2042 can make a comeback but they really got start putting in work. If they gotta content grab or milk old content, bf4 / 3 maps overhauled for the future look would do it. Maybe a boat load of guns and a fix to the whole operator system.
It´s too late. BF2042 is nearly 1 year out and nothing happend. In Cod Warzone is so much content, helloween, crampus, every week new stuff, etc... BF2042 needs a half year to make a good scoreboard and 1 year to rework 2 maps. Only with containers and sandbags. I´m a BF fan but i think the good old times BF2/3/4/1 won´t return.. :´(
![Seungmin "그렇게, 천천히, 우리(As we are)" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/kAzmhLHePqU/mqdefault.jpg)
Truly impressive water physics and overall interactivity in modern warfare 2.
@Chevalier Because you perceive it as realistic, which is what your brain is used to (life-like effects).
It’s what happens when the devs have passion
This guy needs to redo this video the water he's using for battlefield is bugged and doesn't show ripples properly like orbitals as that area where the water is is basically out of bounds.
not really. these games are way behind their times. GTA does better in 2013
@@reptilian4204 GTA isn't exactly "industry standard" for anything
As a CoD fan, witnessing this franchise become on par with battlefield (especially older title) in terms of quality and detail really giving me a sense of joy i never knew could be possible for CoD
its more than on par
Issue is that Battlefield is not what it used to be :(
@@coconutman7797 it isn't.
It's not even on par anymore lol CoD is lightyears ahead.
@@MasoMathiou give thanks to the new teams of DICE, eventually they will learn
Honestly, both have pretty decent water physics. People in the comments kinda exaggerating.
Battlefield holds up pretty well. But, a thing I can agree on, it's laughable how much better a beta of a cod game can do water physics than the game that had them first.
a newer game is better than an older game?? 🤯
@@ramiere1412 yea man a game that was new when it was released and had uncountable bugs is better than a game who's beta is more polished then the released game...... Btw 2042 is recent not that old.....
@@rack0001 i fell through the floor multiple times in the new cod (even got it on video). out of all the bugs bf had I’ve never had that happen
@@ramiere1412 you are missing the point. Battlefield is a franchise that has previous experience with water physics, and cod is pretty new to it. So it's embarassing when COD has the better water physics. In addition to that, BF isn't that old. They also had a lot of time to polish. They just messed it up.
@@Skikopl cod has had water physics for almost a decade i think that’s enough time for them to figure it out
Bf4 had underwater swimming but 2042 doesn’t 💀
Even do it was buggy as hell
All modern BF have under water except 2042. It's pathetic.
No amphibious map tbh. Kinda evolve backwards
because why 2042 is bad game not good as bf4 or bf5 just look mw2 is better than bf 2042
@@clementwong2124 exactly
As a Battlefield fan this breaks my heart lol
It looks absolutely gorgeous. Have you even played the game, yeah certain effects need some work. But its definitely an enjoyable experience.
@@bluupbrr286 which one??
@@banned2638 2042
@@bluupbrr286 yeah the worst fps game ever total fcking scam
@@banned2638 2042 bro…its a decent game imo
It’s a shame what happened to BF. They used to put so much effort into small details. The frostbite engine is capable of doing so much impressive stuff mainly destruction but 2042 barely has any. 2042 is a rushed mess that’s full of bad decisions. The most impressive thing about 2042 graphically is probably the dynamic weather/wind physics and storms… the tornados and sandstorms look amazing.
Red Faction Guerilla have better destruction than all BFs combined
I'm honestly really impressed with the overall detail in MW2. The only that hurts my soul in that video about the CoD water is where it meets the shoreline. That stuff looks like mercury with some fake splashes thrown on top.
If the new Warzone is using the same engine (I assume it is) then I wonder if it has anything to do with their whole ecosystem with crossplatform on other devices like mobile. I only skimmed it so I'm vague on exact details but it sounded like they were trying to allow the same or similar experiences across devices, so I'm thinking maybe that shoreline is part of the downsides of it?
Could be way off the mark and considering how good everything else looks it could be fixable and may already be fixed.
MW 2019 had the same amount of detail imo
@@AXELVISSERS better and worse graphical detail in different places. It's interesting seeing where they go backwards on quality and improve in other places, almost seems random sometimes, but the focus differs in places they feel is more worthy I expect. Some texture work was amazing in mw19, where as it downfalls in mw22 and vice versa.
@@reviewbrah8151 yeah that map in london blew my mind. No map has blown my mind yet this time.
thats classic infinity ward graphics
how does a BETA for a COD game do battlefield better than battlefield?
As a bf fan, 1-4. This is sad. I don't know when Battlefield will return properly again, if ever.
Because MW2 is using most of MW1’s code and has 3 yezrs of development while 2042 is a brand new game with 15 months of production.
@@melcorchancla9431 pretty sure 2042 had less than 15 months of development they kept on restarting shame they didn’t use the 3 years at their fullest but still even tho mw2 is in a much better position it’s ground war mode still can’t top battlefield at battlefield it can have 64 players and large maps and vehicle combat what makes battlefield battlefield is it’s sand box gameplay and environments the 64 players and vehicles are the extra toppings like look at ww3 looks like battlefield but sure as shit don’t play like battlefield since it’s a lot more hardcore and strict
@@melcorchancla9431 honestly 2042 still does battlefield better than mw2 ground war since it’s a lot less strict and competitive and there’s more sandbox capabilities
@@thetrashpope557 I’m playing ground war right now and it’s worse than World at war’s war mode
Battlefields scenery is quite breath taking! But cod wz water physics are a little nicer, especially coming from beta
not wz its MW2
If we discount destruction then MWII actually offers to me everything I ever wanted from a modern day Battlefield. Ground War and Invasion is good enough as is for the "mil-sim" lite I expect from both. Beautiful and polished graphics, perfectly gritty art style, wonderful attention to detail and atmosphere of modern warfare.. Battlefield looks so generic compared to it. Like a souless game without inspiration.
True. Just from the 2042 beta, I felt something was awfully off, as if it were the map and the overall look of the game seemed completely lifeless and had no inspiration. I thought that it'd be fine since it was a beta but after the launch of the full game, it was as if there were no changes made whatsoever. The map feels so lifeless, the environment seems so bland and the guns had a plastic like feel to it, it never felt like a battlefield. That's just my view and take on the game.
And the guns actually have recoil for once
Not for me. It’s missing a class system, server browser, revive system, and (as mentioned above) destruction. Now that being said MWII Ground war is something special and I do think it tops battlefield 2042 for me
MW2022 has a pretty good “destruction” physics for beta haha
Play Insurgency Sandstorm yall
From Graphical standpoint, MWII actually gives what player actually expected for Battlefield 2042.
2042 still has better graphics if you are actually looking at the textures
Honestly I thought that mw2 looked better, but after watching this vid 2042 actually does look better than mw2 (I know it's in beta) people just won't admit that cause of all the hate they got for 2042
@@DoggyPaws4 Yeah, 2042’s ground, foliage environment textures look insanely good. MWII just has better weapon animations
@@enjoi9970 For me, animation design and physics detail more important than the graphics detail. MWII definitely better than the Battlefield 2042
@@DoggyPaws4 as a bf fan you are wrong battlefield 2042 is the worst game ever with mobile graphics i played the beta of cod mw2 its another level in everything from now on i will play only cod until bf make a good game realistic game like bf 3 and v with great graphics like mw2 .
I really wanted to swim after this video 🤣🤣
0:25
That throwing delay tho
when you are doing a comparison please turn off the motion blur . it will make the changes more distinguishable . love your content man .
Somehow they made the best looking shooter franchise look and feel painfuly average, amazing work Dice
you gotta be shitting me if you thought this looked "average", the feel maybe with the effects and all, but definitely not the looks
You gotta be shitting me if both of you really think CoD is one of the best looking video games
@@davidsplooge14 You're right, battlefield 2042 is a piece of below average software. It doesn't compare to battlefield 5 graphically, doesn't carry a semblance of battlefield 1 atmosphere or style and nowhere near the gameplay of battlefield 4... By all means this is barely middle soft AA game let alone a AAA development, thanks for correcting me.
@@bro3217 Who said that? Literally said battlefield just became dogshit, practice reading
@@bro3217 between cod and bf, cod is a thousand times better than battlefield visually, and that's just visually.
MWII also allows you to freely move around in a transport helicopter, an innovation that, as far as I can remember, BF has never allowed you to do. You can't even do it in 2042 without glitching inside the Condor/Hind.
It wouldn't work in BF because flying helicopters is realistic unlike MW where you just press up and down and left and right.
@@Majin-Darnell what about arma 3? Literally a military sim that allows it, stop excusing bf for no reason
@@Majin-Darnell flying helis in BF was never realistic lmao.
Cod fantards pulling out other games cuz the one that they play sucks at an specific area lol
@@magodejos5699 You know, it's funny you say "CoD fantard." Judging by your other comments on this video, you're just as fantarded about Battlefield lmao.
Honestly they both do different things better. In 2042, it interacts with the shore and the wetness of your weapon looks so much better, but in MW2 it’s interactability is much nicer. I like them both
Be careful you’re not automatically shitting on 2042 like everyone else is for easy likes
@@Holdthetomatoesplz It's how the internet works. Thing that was bad stays bad and thing we want good stays good.
@Uijnghhj definitely, anyone who hyped up a game that much deserves the disappointment lol I didn’t get the game at launch but I also am not going to compare it now to where it was at launch because that’s a pretty poor comparison
we are watching Battlefield be lowered into the grave rn. Sad but true
i cant believe how much of a downgrade bf2042 honestly is
bf4,bf1 and bf 5 has pretty good effects in general
How tf is that a downgrade? BF4 literally has worse water effects too so idk why you bring that up lmaoo
@@enjoi9970 aren't you the mf who was getting bullied in the comments section of jackfrag's vid?
@@enjoi9970 granted bf4 had worse effects
Bf1 and 5 are miles better
@@enjoi9970 Physics yes but the look and feel of the different types of body's of water looks good for a game that came out in 2014
@@enjoi9970 bf is done now stop defending the game its funny cartoon game like a mobile game bf2042 now its time for mw2 btw im bf fan but the last game is sucks and funny seriously super hero specialists
2042 feels like such a relic of a game compared to MW2. And I played a ton of Battlefield back in the day. Disappointing how low they have fallen.
*Jumps in water*
Warzone 2: Take a swim, fight underwater!
Warzone: So you have chosen death...
Its really sad how EA literally destroyed the legacy of BF.
I remember when mw2 beta on sariff bay map, me and few other player swimming underwater to suprise the shithead on the opposite island who keep knocking down our spawn area with 50.cal and sniper team lmao, best moment
Ladies and gentlemen, we have officially crossed into the parallel universe.
It's amazing to watch how even a BETA is better than the finished game of BF 2042
That underwater explotion in Mw2 looking sexy as hell tbh
Cod MW2 is kinda a mix between battlefield 2042 and cod mw 2019. And also did they make the speed slower in cod MW2 multiplayer?
Shoutout to Infinity Ward for being able to deliver new experiences in an FPS.
Ground war
DMZ
War zone
MP
There’s gonna be so much to do, now they just need a competitive ranked mode
The only bad thing about the Call of duty game was that it took a long time to reload the weapon, and also if you are reloading the weapon and start running, it stops reloading the weapon
Idk what ppl are in about. BF water looks waaaaaay better than mw.
Yo that underwater grenade in mw2 !!! The delay/flash before the eruption
Bruh CoD MW2 2022 is more of a Battlefield game then Battlefield 2042
The car just dissapearing in bf when he hopped out in the water 🫠
i can't get over the colour of the water in Bf2024. that Azure colour is so beautiful man I could stare into it all day.
Call of Duty could use some tweaking to smooth out the edges where the water meets the land. Other than that I think it's pretty solid!
I'm a battlefield fan I'm joining the cod community now I played the beta and I'm very impressed with it ground war is the same as battlefield I been looking for a shooting game for a long time now I been playing bf3 again as I have been sick of playing bf4 for so long
Battlefield's (not just 2024; 1 and 5 as well) water ripples are too excessive. It makes the water feel less dense.
Modern Warfare keeps ripples at a relatively realistic level. You can even see the minute ripples from the gun swooshing in the water surface. The only thing I hope CoD improves on is the water's contact with land or shore with some waves.
I always thought water in BF games looked like Jello lol
Should have been on the orbital map because It's got waves like the mw ocean
Is it bad that I didn’t know there was water in maps in bf2042 like that you can walk up to and jump in? I feel like this game variety In maps is a lot less then other battlefields like 3-4 with all the island hoping and just overall different maps worth this one I feel it’s just snow dessert and some civilized places not complaining just intrigued by it
There's very little water in the bf2042 maps. Manifest has water surrounding the playable area, Kaleidoscope has water at one edge of the map, Orbital has some water on one side of the playable map (but not in the shrunken gametypes), Exposure has a narrow stretch of water at the edge of the map (seen in this video), Discarded has a tiny bit of swimmable water at one edge, but no others in the base game have any noteworthy areas of water (unless I've missed one). Renewal could have had an event where water floods through the channels and into the basement of the main building, but I don't see it happening at this stage
god damn, the water in BF looks like kool-aid lol
Personally I think they should have gone further & had things like the sand react with the water.. so as the waves come in it makes the sand darker / wet effect..
Crazy how Crysis was released more than 10 years ago and has these beat
CoD beta doing Battlefield better than Battlefield, not just in ground war big scale betters but also fidelity across the board
I love how shooting water became a quality comparison thing lol. Like how often do you shoot water in fps games and be like "daaaaamn duuude that's rad quality right there"
When criticizing 2042 got you easy likes
No because in the MW2 campaign will there literally missions under water, that's why the quality
I know CoD is better but the water colour and reflection on The BF game is soo pretty
Notice how when he shoots the gun on water in battle field it makes a sound like it’s dropping on land
Compare bf5 vs mw2 at this point. Bf2042 have way less details than bf5
they paid more attention to water now that you can actually interact with it now
...and not die
damn they nailed the details on the JLTV in modern warfare pretty well
I just wish I could see a BF and CoD crossover game at some point, where both devs would share their knowledge with each other and work on the parts that they are know for to be good at.
Which cod had any under water / on land maps for multiplayer
Battlefield will
And always had better graphics. Mw2 is a vanguard or Cold War reskin. Mw19 had better graphics
I'm mw19 fan and am beginning to feel the same. Like , mw2 feels more like vanguard or cold war reskin than mw19 reskin
Since the MW2019 engine, imo COD has surpassed BF graphically. Even BF5’s player models, ADS views, and animations all started looking cartoony and strange (compared to BF1/4/3), and got even worse in 2042. But MW19 was just a freaking marvel to look at, and the animations/sounds, phew it is truly a masterpiece.
Like what BF3 was to the world in 2012, MW19’s engine is that today.
The developers have been focusing so much on graphics and physics that the gameplay quality has only been going down
modern warfare had nailed its animation . i wish DMZ have hard core realistic animation
One thing can't be denied...This shows one studio's leap forward and another's stagnation.
Wow never thought I’d see the day where cod surpasses battlefield with animation and physics
I like how these games are comparing each other, and rockstar did this in 2013. Rockstar makes game ahead of their time
Never thought I would see COD outshine BF but here we are in 2022 and thats exactly whats happening.
MW2 looks fantastic. One of the few games I’ve seen where submerging looks good too. Far Cry 6 is the only other game I’ve seen do a great job when you submerge
Dying light is amazing at that as well
@@guillegarcia7146 Dying light 2 unfortunately hasn't nailed it yet
Coming from DICE game we expect greatness. We were let down. CoD just surprised everyone with it's attention to detail now and my hats is off to them.
We modern war fans are blessed to have games like these
1.COD4
2 .INSURGENCY SANDSTORM
3.BF4 N 3
4.MW19
5.SQUAD
6.r6
7.mwr
Now my only question is if the brass can interact with the water
I think there are merits for both, 2042 isn't a bad game but it isn't a great game either
Bro that map you're on in 2042 is absolutely gorgeous
What map is that?
@@AeonGreyh i don't know but its absolutely beautiful
@@AeonGreyh exposure
Huge BF fan here. Played 2042 for about 4 hours and deleted it. Never even thinking to install it again.
Competition is good, and I think we might actually get an actual pretty looking and actually finished Battlefield in the next couple of years that won’t have the stupid quips in them. Modern warfare keeping their quality high, and have expanded( 3rd person mode is fucking great)to encompass a few different ways to play and with MW2022, it’s better than ever, hopefully EA will invest more in battlefield, it sounds like that maybe they might be doing just that 🤔✌️
Why does the mw2 water look like it's flowing 100 mph
fair comparison between two games in beta
Always thought battlefields water physics was weird looking
Disculpa. En el beta lo tengo el warzone con candado. Como puedo desbloquear
Where's the wet effects on MW2 weapons???
I'm honestly ready to just give up the good old days of Battlefield and start mourning Battlefield 2, 3, and 4. EA obviously doesnt have the same quality of devs in their rotation anymore.
Mw 2019 or MW2? Which one should I buy?
0:36 seems a little off here
Why ?
Clearly you have not used a hand grenade irl
@@bigbadt Did I mention the grenade here? I just saying it seems off since the water splash didn't splashed some surfaces LMAO
@@etash6932 the water splash, you can see the edge that it didn't splash most of the surfaces.
If you're talking about the water reaching land, I agree. But the actual shock wave ripples look impressive.
2042 seems like they are using airsoft guns
That was really good both those games have come a very long ways in my opinion and I got to say battlefield holding its own but cod man holy smokes to see it come that far in graphics and in water and in the physics it's so awesome
Watching the water rise inside the truck was just … wonderful 😢bravo COD
They've both got good water physics.
Only issue I have is the transition from water to land in COD. Looks kinda bad honestly 😅
Other than that though they're both good
Infinity ward really kicking dice's ass
Gotta hand it to COD, they really found their balls when it comes to gun sounds lately.
How facinating to see better water physics in mw2 BETA than battlefield 2042. We can expect better physics in Full version
If cod had the 2042 color palette it would be ggs
The comments are really exaggerated to be honest. Stop following the hate train. I expected worse but they both looked good actually. The only kinda odd thing is the water physics since BF had them long before COD but that's pretty much it. When you're actually playing, you barely ever use the water anyways
MWII is just better in every way for me personally. Sure destructible environment would be cool but at the same time BF only has a few preselected buildings that can be demolished. Some walls are destructible and some are indestructible. Gameplay MWII is insanely fun and BF isn’t even close imo. And I actually occasionally have fun with BF2042.
I like the 2042 water effects more ngl, they feel more powerful.
As a BF fan ... it's sad what has become of BF :´(
Now Do Battlefield 4 conquest gameplay Vs MW2 ground war
I think Infinity ward was going for dark gritty war type, where Battlefield 2042 is more beautiful and fun
Sadly for battlefield 2042, its inferior to it's own last games...
I feared this day would arrive 😂
These mw2 clips are from a beta and it’s already this good in comparison to the full game release of BF2042
mw2 Best than 2042 🕺🕺🕺❤️❤️
Just play BF4. Same thing, better map designs, and still a pretty big community. The vehicles, weapons, customization, camos, soldier lingo, and weather effects, especially level-ution, is still top tier.
Just wish Dice or EA would open servers to make it cross platform.
I hope you did the mw2 on PC because the water looks way better on PC
Battlefield 2042 ain't really that bad, at first it was ridiculous but now they're slowly climbing up the ladder. However I'm not gonna even try to steal the credit from CoD with MW2. For a beta? Shit the game is beautiful in every aspect let's not forget the huge content they're bringing to the table as well. But people really need to stop comparing BF with CoF because it's a whole different experience in terms of gameplay and therefore they can't be compared. In my personal opinion i think BF will always be a step ahead of CoD that's how I've always seen it. BFV and BF1 had so much hate when they were first released and now they're one of the best games till this day, give it some time and BF 2042 will definitely hold it's title after the huge downfall.
I still think bf2042 can make a comeback but they really got start putting in work. If they gotta content grab or milk old content, bf4 / 3 maps overhauled for the future look would do it. Maybe a boat load of guns and a fix to the whole operator system.
It´s too late. BF2042 is nearly 1 year out and nothing happend. In Cod Warzone is so much content, helloween, crampus, every week new stuff, etc... BF2042 needs a half year to make a good scoreboard and 1 year to rework 2 maps. Only with containers and sandbags. I´m a BF fan but i think the good old times BF2/3/4/1 won´t return.. :´(
I Don't even want games with insane details I just want games to stop being realistic and take time for the gameplay to be good and no problems
This is how far call of duty has become from best to worst to great
This test isn’t good. The water in that place is bugged, test it in orbital for a fair comparison.
I agree.
He knows lol, I can bet he did it on purpose.
@@jesse8716 Yeah, that seems like a really weird place to test in, literally everyone tests in the same place in orbital usually.