Do Genesis and Evolution REALLY Contradict? Christian Scientist Explains All 7 Days
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 6 июн 2024
- For over a century, the debate between Christian creationism and the theory of evolution has divided society. But is there really a definite division between the two? Can you believe in the Genesis creation account AND evolution at the same time? On a recent episode of The Glenn Beck Podcast, Glenn sat down with Christian astrophysicist Hugh Ross, who believes Genesis "perfectly follows the scientific method." Hugh takes Glenn through the 6 days of creation day by day and explains the evidence we now have that the story is true. And it starts, just like any honest scientific investigation, with having the right point of view...
Watch the full podcast HERE: • Christian Scientist Pr...
► Click HERE to subscribe to Glenn Beck on RUclips: bit.ly/2UVLqhL
► Click HERE to subscribe to BlazeTV: get.blazetv.com/glenn
► Click HERE to subscribe to BlazeTV RUclips: / @blazetv
► Click HERE to sign up to Glenn's newsletter: www.glennbeck.com/st/Morning_...
Connect with Glenn on Social Media:
/ glennbeck
/ glennbeck
/ glennbeck
One of the keys to Genesis is after the sixth day God was finished creating looked at his work and said it was good then he rested on the seventh day. now tell me on thing that has been created since then, nothing, when we lose a species, we never get it back it gone forever. man, and Saten can only modify God work we cannot create something new, even a newborn comes from Gods work. LGBTQ is the work of Saten and man's modifying Gods work.
Biblical time and calendars differ from modern systems in several ways:
Day
The biblical day begins at sunset and ends at dawn, with the second half of the day being daylight hours. The day was divided into eight "watches" in the Old Testament, four during the day and four at night. By the New Testament, the Roman custom of dividing the day into 12 hours of day and 12 hours of night was adopted, but minutes and seconds were not counted.
Month
The biblical month is based on the lunar cycle, with one new moon marking the beginning of a new month. The Hebrew calendar has 12 months, including Nisan, Iyar, Sivan, Tammuz, Av, Elul, Tishrei, Heshvan, Kislev, Tevet, Shevat, and Adar. Some months have 29 days, while others have 30. During leap years, Adar is replaced with Adar I and Adar II, with Adar I coming before Adar II after Shevat.
Year
The biblical year is based on solar years, in addition to the lunar months. In ancient times, years were made up of 12 30-day months, totaling 360 days.
Biggest problem with trying to fit evolution into Genesis is that death would exist before man was even created. Genesis tells us man's sin was the reason death entered the world. Romans 8, which is all about mankinds curse under sin, says in verse 22 that all of creation groans under that curse. Man's sin is the entire reason Jesus, God in flesh, came to die as the perfect sacrifice to offer redemption to those who would accept it. If He is the all powerful Creator, then He is the author of science and physics as well. But they are subject to Him, not the other way around. Junk science has been around far longer than just these past few years, and much of it has been used to build the altar of evolution people try to fit God into. Don't let this stuff deceive you. May the Lord bless you. Numbers 6:24-26
Death did exist. Did you ever think that there was a world where Satan was set over and he became lifted up and God judge him and that world? Genesis 1:2 but the earth came to be without form and void and darkness was over the face of the deep...
Truth
Exactly this. The sin problem, and God's solution for the sin problem, the central theme. The Creation story is evidence that God, as our Creator, has a just claim on our worship and obedience.
AMEN! Romans 6:23 "For the wages of sin is death."
@@DerekRhoads Where does it say in the Bible that death came before sin?
It was 6 literal days. Genesis is specific to say and the morning and the evening was the first day. And each day after, the morning and the evening was the second day
This is positively confirmed in Exodus 20:8-11. Ya know the commandment to keep the Sabbath Holy. All three cannot be correct, personally I'm going with what God told Moses with what He wrote with His own finger in stone, because it didn't come directly from within Moses either.
Anyone who believes the entire universe was created in six 24-hour days will believe anything.
@@88Padillaso do you believe God is unable to create the universe in 6 days?
@@88Padillaso, you think that a power who can create a UNIVERSE can’t do it in 7 days or 7 seconds? How about the possibility that some of it was created already mature, like Adam and Eve?
@@88PadillaAnyone who believes you came from Hominids with zero evidence in the fossil record and no proof of macroevolution will believe literally anything....
We have found soft tissue in dinosaurs yet you will believe ridiculous theory that can't be proven that, it's actually 300 million years old.
Or how about the absurd theory of the ort cloud that comets refuel themselves, yet it hasn't been proven.
When I was a child they used to say the Tyrannosaurus Rex was the king of the predators of dinosaurs, now they say they were unevolved scavengers.
Science still can't tell me with 100% accuracy with the weather is going to be like an hour from now, yet people like you will believe what they tell you the weather will be in 100 years.
Who's the more credible scientist, Neil deGrasse Tyson or Sir Isaac Newton? Everyone knows Sir Isaac Newton, and he was a Christian. So you can be a fantastic scientist and still be a Christian.
Then we have the Big bang theory which is being disproven but for decades Christian scientists have been saying the fall of thermal dynamics disproves the Big bang yet look at how many people like you believed it.
Why do scientists keep saying that the universe is expanding in the shape of a cone and they say that the point of the cone is where the Big bang happened how is it that matter only moved in one direction in an explosion?
Scientists say that the start of all life was a Cambrian explosion, yet we have proof in the fossilized records that cells were dividing at the point of the Cambrian explosion. How were they dividing when they didn't know how to divide already? According to evolution That information had to develop from somewhere. It takes over 100,000 processes for a cell to divide and that information had to be written into the cell for it to know how to divide.
Yet you believe all that and you're the one who says Christians will believe anything?...
One day, we all will know.
I can't help but think that Dr. Ross is like Sheldon but if he had listened to his mom about Jesus.
I love this description 😂
Yikes
I just love this.
Looooove this
NO..
I am lifted reading these comments. We're all on the same page. Pray for Glen and that the HOLY SPIRIT will guide him. I sense that he is a good man. And I don't say that lightly
You should interview someone from Answers In Genesis
Interview Ken Ham!!!! (I met him while the Creation museum was under construction) I love AIG, and the Ark Encounter in Kentucky
@kittyfruitloop8264 truly a spectacular exhibit. The exhibits within the ark are incredible too. My favorite is the one critiquing common children's books, with their picture of a giraffe with its head and neck sticking out of the ark, that setup the grounds to make children doubt the whole Genesis, and eventually Bible.
@@kittyfruitloop8264 yes went there too! So well done both the creation museum and the Ark!
This man stated billions of years. He is NOT a creation scientist!
Please stop. If the Universe is only thousands of years old, then why do we see stars billions of years into the past? You're literally saying God is pranking us
I'm astonished at how these things are still treated as though they're beyond understanding.
It's dishonest.
"If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed which could not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down."
Too bad no one was there to ask about the bombardier beetle or bacterial flagella motors, not to mention the fact that no species, not even bacteria, has ever evolved a new function in all of recorded human history.
Richard Lenski has indeed found that in Ecoli. He's been studying in the same laboratory for almost 30 years. 60,000 generations of the same bacteria.
When he changed it's environment eventually a new form adapted to their environment by developing the ability to process citrate, rather than just glucose.
The previous strains of Ecoli did not have this ability whatsoever. Out of millions of small changes in the genome eventually one or two are beneficial, and they out compete the rest.
@@pierredelecto7069 Look up irreducible complexity, he didn't find jack squat, he just broke its ability to regulate an existing function, which took him 70,000 mutations over thirty years.
Breaking the ability of an organism to regulate an existing function is not an evolution of a new function.
Did you not read the study, did not understand it, or do you not know the difference between a new function and a broken existing function?
@@pierredelecto7069 What he did, in lamens terms, it cut off a dog's leg and said 'Look, dogs can be three-legged.' asinine...
evolution is the slow modification of dna from the one celled to the multicelled organism
@@ELXABERRight. Any time there is a mutation information is lost. It’s never gained, which removes the possibility of one organism tuning into another.
God said let there be light, and it was, when God speaks it is, scientist don’t understand
No... The Bible does not condone evolution.
Easy answer.
The world constantly evolves, but the theory of evolution is just that, a theory.
- I believe God created everything out of existing materials
- Due to scientific evidence, I believe in the Big Bang and organic macroevolution
- I do not believe in a deceitful God, therefore He would not trick us by leaving tons of fake evidence of these events
- Therefore He must have directed these processes
- Some atheists believe that evolution disproves a Creator and think He should have used “magic” or “direct” Creation rather than using natural laws
- My realization: However, scientific proof of a direct Creation would take away the aspect of faith, which is a necessary aspect of mortality, therefore evolution suits His purposes
- In addition, there is room for disbelief utilizing a natural process (hence why some people are atheists), while still great capacity for appreciation of the immense beauty and complexity of nature and life, whether a believer or nonbeliever
Both are two sides of the same scam congruent to the major scam format of planet Earth. They give you two completely unacceptable options, both of which result in disaster, and drawn out diminishing returns on your labor.
He’s not talking about evolution in the sense that you’re thinking, but in time, lots of things change.
The Bible is the only source to be fully trusted. It took me 40 years to figure that out. That's as real as it gets.
I am surprised on how educated men, can't see pass their noses. When the Bible says, "Day", in the Hebrew, it's meaning is just that...a 24 hour period. A Day ! Not Billions or Millions of years. People will believe what they will. But it changes nothing. God works outside of man's knowledge.
Biblical time and calendars differ from modern systems in several ways:
Day
The biblical day begins at sunset and ends at dawn, with the second half of the day being daylight hours. The day was divided into eight "watches" in the Old Testament, four during the day and four at night. By the New Testament, the Roman custom of dividing the day into 12 hours of day and 12 hours of night was adopted, but minutes and seconds were not counted.
Month
The biblical month is based on the lunar cycle, with one new moon marking the beginning of a new month. The Hebrew calendar has 12 months, including Nisan, Iyar, Sivan, Tammuz, Av, Elul, Tishrei, Heshvan, Kislev, Tevet, Shevat, and Adar. Some months have 29 days, while others have 30. During leap years, Adar is replaced with Adar I and Adar II, with Adar I coming before Adar II after Shevat.
Year
The biblical year is based on solar years, in addition to the lunar months. In ancient times, years were made up of 12 30-day months, totaling 360 days.
Dr Ross got embarrassed by Ken ham on a TBN show. Dr Ross could not answer in scripture where his ideas are in scripture. Evolution is a secular worldview.
He just answered them. What show did you watch?
Albeit quite religious...
Rick ruclips.net/video/yYdWBj84FFw/видео.htmlsi=nqhKY8InqFb_6UKy
Hugh Ross doesn't believe in macroevolution. You can believe in an old Earth without believing in macroevolution.
God created the world in 6 days
Biblical time and calendars differ from modern systems in several ways:
Day
The biblical day begins at sunset and ends at dawn, with the second half of the day being daylight hours. The day was divided into eight "watches" in the Old Testament, four during the day and four at night. By the New Testament, the Roman custom of dividing the day into 12 hours of day and 12 hours of night was adopted, but minutes and seconds were not counted.
Month
The biblical month is based on the lunar cycle, with one new moon marking the beginning of a new month. The Hebrew calendar has 12 months, including Nisan, Iyar, Sivan, Tammuz, Av, Elul, Tishrei, Heshvan, Kislev, Tevet, Shevat, and Adar. Some months have 29 days, while others have 30. During leap years, Adar is replaced with Adar I and Adar II, with Adar I coming before Adar II after Shevat.
Year
The biblical year is based on solar years, in addition to the lunar months. In ancient times, years were made up of 12 30-day months, totaling 360 days.
Hugh Ross can answer all questions about science and the Bible. This is an overview of science and the Bible that no one else has. All the pieces fall into place and make sense.
I wish all of you would also give a voice to young earth ideals. Weigh it out. Why are all of the conservative channels I follow only giving this guys view a chance when there are far more Christian scientists who believe in young earth? Wild to me. Gotta keep that narrative. God forbid we reject the ideals we have been forced fed, must mesh them with God. Can't be any other explanation.
Each Creation day ends with “And there was evening and there was morning, the third day.”
There’s a reason why God put that phrase at the end of each creation day-..He wants us to know that it was a 24 hour day!
If you were there when God created Adam …How old would you say he looked? Adam wasn’t created as a baby! At the moment of creation he looked like a full grown man, yet he hadn’t even had his first birthday!
The age of the Earth and the Universe follows the same pattern. Origins can’t be found out by “SCIENCE” because it can’t be repeated…it can ONLY BE KNOWN BY REVELATION, by the Only PERSON that was there.
Glenn, I've been with you since you were on Fox! I love you and I'm sure Hugh is a really nice person, but he is deadly wrong! Please research his opinions thoroughly. I also love science and know with every fiber of my brain, that he is wrong! Science agrees with Genesis when you take the Bible literally and you maintain a clear worldview with a strong Biblical foundation! That foundation is Genesis and we don't have to squeeze more time, re-interpret or compromise that foundation in any manner! God is correct, because he was there and he can not lie! You can find a lifetime of videos with all the scientific proof from Dr. Kent Hovind on RUclips! I also really like 'Standing for Truth', here on RUclips!
Remember Glenn is not Christian, he is mormon. That is why he has no problems bringing this charlatan on his show. I love Glenn as well but he should stick to politics and current events.
I agree, he is mostly wrong. He assumes carbon dating is actually proof of millions of years. He doesnt understand what god is. Puts him in a human box. God is all that is. All you can see and all you cant see, he is inside all life and all life is inside him. Everything including the planets are alive. God doesnt create dead things. Growing earth theory is correct in the physical. Note wheels within a wheel. 4 living creatures inside earth. Baby moons inside a living growing earth that is also a part of god, whom he loved. We cant see god because we are inside god and a part of him. Like a heart or a brain. We live because he lives.
I found him on MSNBC while waiting for O'Reilly on Fox...I found Tucker there also... remember the bow tie?
God's not a he or a she. God is sexless and not in flesh and blood. We are all part of god and eventually merge with the essence again after reaching full god or Christ consciousness which takes many incarnations.
You are wrong. Not enough time to explain it all. But, but one is time in the Bible isn’t time as we know it today. He’s saying God is Science. The Bible is also full of parables, which isn’t literal. When Jesus speaks it’s literal through interpretation of man who wrote it down.
We are all tadpoles contemplating the concept of frogs.
First billion years of water? This guy doesn’t believe the Bible. God created in says days, not billions of years.
I don’t believe it was billions, but I certainly don’t believe it was single days.
Biblical time and calendars differ from modern systems in several ways:
Day
The biblical day begins at sunset and ends at dawn, with the second half of the day being daylight hours. The day was divided into eight "watches" in the Old Testament, four during the day and four at night. By the New Testament, the Roman custom of dividing the day into 12 hours of day and 12 hours of night was adopted, but minutes and seconds were not counted.
Month
The biblical month is based on the lunar cycle, with one new moon marking the beginning of a new month. The Hebrew calendar has 12 months, including Nisan, Iyar, Sivan, Tammuz, Av, Elul, Tishrei, Heshvan, Kislev, Tevet, Shevat, and Adar. Some months have 29 days, while others have 30. During leap years, Adar is replaced with Adar I and Adar II, with Adar I coming before Adar II after Shevat.
Year
The biblical year is based on solar years, in addition to the lunar months. In ancient times, years were made up of 12 30-day months, totaling 360 days.
@@lindas9806 interesting information. How does that relate to the biblical account of creation in days? Why are you able to change what is described as a day into a month, or a solar year, etc?
Regardless of that interpretation, how is it helpful to make this case? Doesn’t it lessen the power and glory of God to believe it took longer than a day? Does any amount of time make it any more “believable” that the creator of the universe took a month or a year or even many years?
It’s fundamentally a matter of belief. Do you believe what the Bible says or do you not believe and need to make human justifications for something that is unfathomable and unexplainable to our finite minds?
I have the greatest respect for this guest and his interpretation of God's form of creation! To me, I never saw a single argument to confirm in my mind how God's work is not an evolutionary process! How do scientists deny the very thing the Bible explains clearly? The Bible totally tells us how God created life. It in no way conflicts with the evolutionary process. They are one and the same. Isn't it funny that man is so hell-bent on pushing a non-creator approach to that which was so definitively written in the Word?
13:50 I think thats a big stretch there. Maybe from God's point of view and symantics, but apart from that I think that's a really long limb to go out on.
Creation is essential. It’s the first test of faith in the Bible. Do you believe? Yes or no? You can’t pick and choose what fits your own version of god.
Dr.Arnold Murray on Shepherd's Chapel explains it best, He's went on to be with the Lord, but you can still watch it.
You should watch it Glenn ❤🙏🇺🇸👍
This is very informative! I find this explanation credible!
May the Holy Spirit show Ross the truth and the error of his paradigm, and may his heart be softened to accept the truth that he is wrong.
In Jesus’ name, Amen.
Biblical time and calendars differ from modern systems in several ways:
Day
The biblical day begins at sunset and ends at dawn, with the second half of the day being daylight hours. The day was divided into eight "watches" in the Old Testament, four during the day and four at night. By the New Testament, the Roman custom of dividing the day into 12 hours of day and 12 hours of night was adopted, but minutes and seconds were not counted.
Month
The biblical month is based on the lunar cycle, with one new moon marking the beginning of a new month. The Hebrew calendar has 12 months, including Nisan, Iyar, Sivan, Tammuz, Av, Elul, Tishrei, Heshvan, Kislev, Tevet, Shevat, and Adar. Some months have 29 days, while others have 30. During leap years, Adar is replaced with Adar I and Adar II, with Adar I coming before Adar II after Shevat.
Year
The biblical year is based on solar years, in addition to the lunar months. In ancient times, years were made up of 12 30-day months, totaling 360 days.
Now have Ken Ham on.
With this guy, the guest of Glenn Beck he realized too much on science you can’t just give God all the credit all the glory as everlasting God who created all things and spoke intoexistence.
Evolution isn't biblical, and neither is Dr Ross's old-earth worldview.
I don't believe that they conflict.
Charles Darwin never said Creation did not happen, he just observed that evolution also happens.
- I believe God created everything out of existing materials
- Due to scientific evidence, I believe in the Big Bang and organic macroevolution
- I do not believe in a deceitful God, therefore He would not trick us by leaving tons of fake evidence of these events
- Therefore He must have directed these processes
- Some atheists believe that evolution disproves a Creator and think He should have used “magic” or “direct” Creation rather than using natural laws
- My realization: However, scientific proof of a direct Creation would take away the aspect of faith, which is a necessary aspect of mortality, therefore evolution suits His purposes
- In addition, there is room for disbelief utilizing a natural process (hence why some people are atheists), while still great capacity for appreciation of the immense beauty and complexity of nature and life, whether a believer or nonbeliever
There is a LOT more packed into the Genesis story than most know .. until they behold the tree, and take hold of that serpent. Oh, the restoration is going to be WONDERFUL!
This “Christian” lost me when he said “billions of years ago”… creation was 6 DAYS
The terminology in the original text implies that the six days of creation were done with existing materials, meaning God had created everything before He started "remodeling" the earth, much like He will do when the heavens and the earth will be destroyed by fire and He creates a "new heaven and a new earth". This implies that there could have been millions or billions of years between verse 1 and verse 2 of Genesis chapter one. There is no contradiction and in no way supports evolution.
@@kd2mill I do not ascribe to the Gap Theory. I take the Bible literally.
@@axisfighter By the original text and other passages in the Bible, God's Word indicates a longer period of time than 6000 years. It's not an insult to God to believe in a longer period, nor does it imply a lack of faith to believe so.
I appreciate Dr Ross. Thanks for having him on your show.
@@kd2mill please show evidence of your claims.
Listen Kent Hovind or Dr Chuck Missler
The night to the morning was the first day and HE saw it was good. And remember my brothers and sisters,it was spoken by HIS word. This is a form of idle thinking., bringing GOD down to our level which wasn't done until JESUS came.....to connect us back to HIM.
Wow! Fascinating! Hallelujah!!
I prefer the Book of Jubilees version of the 7days
I never believed in science's theory of evolution. I think the process of natural selection is real but not to the point where people evolved forward from a cell, monkey. What makes more sense to me is that creation is devolving backward from an initially perfect state that will eventually end in a chaotic state without intervention. This is more inline with the law of entropy.
Understand evolution before you speak non sense. We didn’t evolve from monkeys.
I can't believe that science used to think animals were on land before vegetation. That doesn't make sense logically, much less scientifically. I've always been skeptical of the Creation story, too, so I'm not speaking from a position of bias, either. This guy makes some AWESOME points, though. I'm listening now.
- I believe God created everything out of existing materials
- Due to scientific evidence, I believe in the Big Bang and organic macroevolution
- I do not believe in a deceitful God, therefore He would not trick us by leaving tons of fake evidence of these events
- Therefore He must have directed these processes
- Some atheists believe that evolution disproves a Creator and think He should have used “magic” or “direct” Creation rather than using natural laws
- My realization: However, scientific proof of a direct Creation would take away the aspect of faith, which is a necessary aspect of mortality, therefore evolution suits His purposes
- In addition, there is room for disbelief utilizing a natural process (hence why some people are atheists), while still great capacity for appreciation of the immense beauty and complexity of nature and life, whether a believer or nonbeliever
Another defense of dinosaurs needing to be around lots of water...is the fact that some of them had a body mass of 80 tons, meaning they would have had to drink a LOT of water to survive.
Glenn. (Or more likely, Glenn’s staff.) I dismissed this podcast originally because of the term “Christian Scientist”, thinking you meant the cult, not a scientist who is a Christian. My husband listened and told me I would enjoy it…he was correct. This was a great conversation. Just something to consider, since you used the same term on this clip.
Beats me what this gentleman is talking about, he seems to want to combine milions of years with the seven day creation, Sir, it don't work that way!
Great! Thanks!
Water above the firmament.
How it's done isn't the main point rather who did it is
Always guy 70 -100 getting religious
i never heard Hugh's takes on some of these things i put in doc on my page 25 yr ago or so
oh i add that biggest bones we fin fit with a large lizard growing from creation to flood
Can anyone validate evolution because all I see is adaptation.
A lot of you need to watch Zietgeist 2007
Yes.
Sin > Death > Restoration
Glen....get a Bible and read it again and again and then again once more and I promise you the Bible will start to read you. Then it will guide you both heart and mind. God bless you.
Theists: "how can we claim all scientific discovery so that we're never wrong? 🤔"
- I believe God created everything out of existing materials
- Due to scientific evidence, I believe in the Big Bang and organic macroevolution
- I do not believe in a deceitful God, therefore He would not trick us by leaving tons of fake evidence of these events
- Therefore He must have directed these processes
- Some atheists believe that evolution disproves a Creator and think He should have used “magic” or “direct” Creation rather than using natural laws
- My realization: However, scientific proof of a direct Creation would take away the aspect of faith, which is a necessary aspect of mortality, therefore evolution suits His purposes
- In addition, there is room for disbelief utilizing a natural process (hence why some people are atheists), while still great capacity for appreciation of the immense beauty and complexity of nature and life, whether a believer or nonbeliever
Adam would've been way older than 930 years old if day 6 was thousands or millions of years.
Oh…I wanted to hear more. MrsS
Dr Ross is dead wrong on certain issues; and YES evolution does explicitly contradict the Bible
From Genesis to Revelations
Darwin specifically wrote his theory in order to find a way to "kill" God. Granted, Darwin's theory was not the first crack at it but he provided the most successful attempt to attack the Church.
God the Father is in every human mind that is what makes us human and he knows your every thought and you are judged by your acts
It was supposed to be a mystery.. that's why there's so many contradictions..imho
@glennbeck, you should have Dr. Gerald Schroeder on to have a discussion about this as well. He's a PhD in nuclear physics and earth and planetary sciences from MIT and has a few books out to show how Genesis lines up with what Science says about the age of the universe and the development of earth.
Please someone explain this to me because I respect his viewpoint. How do you get he's on surface on the Earth from hovering above the surface of the earth. Is thus like the difference of being 3 feet above with focus on the surface and being 5 miles up literally shifting things from above?
7 day creation. The Bible can absolutely defend itself. I challenge you to put it to the test. Evolution is a theory not fact. Remember the only reason we have science to begin with is that people believed in a reasonable God that made the world reasonable.
A scientific theory is not a "guess," but an explanation of an aspect of the natural world and universe that can be repeatedly tested and corroborated in accordance with the scientific method, using accepted protocols of observation, measurement, and evaluation of results
- I believe God created everything out of existing materials
- Due to scientific evidence, I believe in the Big Bang and organic macroevolution
- I do not believe in a deceitful God, therefore He would not trick us by leaving tons of fake evidence of these events
- Therefore He must have directed these processes
- Some atheists believe that evolution disproves a Creator and think He should have used “magic” or “direct” Creation rather than using natural laws
- My realization: However, scientific proof of a direct Creation would take away the aspect of faith, which is a necessary aspect of mortality, therefore evolution suits His purposes
- In addition, there is room for disbelief utilizing a natural process (hence why some people are atheists), while still great capacity for appreciation of the immense beauty and complexity of nature and life, whether a believer or nonbeliever
- *Measurements* such as radiometric dating of sediment (determined w/ levels of radioisotopes using different elements that independently confirm each other) that match the gradual adaptation seen in the fossil record (such as filling of niches after extinction events, convergent evolution, exaptations, adaptation of dinosaurs from reptilian traits to avian). You only find T Rex fossils in sediment dated to ~66MYA.
- *Observations* such as speciation, pseudogenes, transposons in great apes that other primates don’t possess (and the gene expression mechanism leading to tail loss), micro chromosomes, viral genome remnants in host organisms
- *Experiments* replicating chemical evolution mechanisms
How exactly does it come from reformation theology?
We are bound by time, God is not bound by time. So 1 day referenced by God, could be 1million years to us.
Masons huh Glenn ….. what degree Glenn ….. shame on you ….
👍
I was thinking about it they fount I Antarctica ÷vedence of plant life. That could be also related to the float of Noah's time. This is best explanation I ever heard, thank you. Evolution could not have happens. You made my day
In the beginning according to Genesis God created the heavens and the earth
God created earth before Sun & Moon. Which begs the question, how can the earth revolve around a Sun which was not created yet?
Also, it DOES NOT say that The Spirit of God was hovering over the waters of The Earth. It says hovering over the waters of The Great Deep and that God created an expanse and separated the waters above from below.....
This is a lame and inaccurate representative of the text.
What TF..... hiw about a chalkboard example, GB.
Why are you acting captivated?
New International Version: "....and the Spirit of God was hovering over the waters."
King James Version: "And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters."
New king James which is one of the oldest most similar to Hebrew English translations does say “the spirit of God”
Its true , its all my fault , all of it
God created man in his image, that wasnt an ape
Kent hovind destroyed this guy
Ken Ham of Answers in Genesis
It’s interesting that in Genesis 1 the word God is H430 is Eloheim which is plural. In Genesis 2:4 it refers to Lord God. I have no doubt that our Lord God is in heaven above us (Acts 7:49 Heaven is My throne and the Earth is My footstool). However, maybe there were workers (not Lord God, but eloheim) who did the work to create the Earth.
Colossians 1:16-17
For in Him, Jesus, all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through Him and for Him. He is before all things, and in Him all things hold together.
@@yaddystanley5980 Yes, I agree. Jesus created all things, but why the difference in the word God used. There is a distinction for a reason. I know we will find out once we get to Heaven. However, just like a general contractor has workers under him, maybe Jesus did too and in Genesis 1 maybe that is referring to them.
@@believer2361 Do you really think Jesus needed help? I mean he is GOD!
It’s quite a story.
God entered His Creation and WAS the light!
This is the dumbest thing I've heard all week
I thought it was a pretty good explanation. I don’t believe in the timeline, but I like the way it was talked about
Evolution = random God = design random is ridiculous
While mutations are random, natural selection is anything *but* random. Pseudogenes are one such mechanism
- I believe God created everything out of existing materials
- Due to scientific evidence, I believe in the Big Bang and organic macroevolution
- I do not believe in a deceitful God, therefore He would not trick us by leaving tons of fake evidence of these events
- Therefore He must have directed these processes
- Some atheists believe that evolution disproves a Creator and think He should have used “magic” or “direct” Creation rather than using natural laws
- My realization: However, scientific proof of a direct Creation would take away the aspect of faith, which is a necessary aspect of mortality, therefore evolution suits His purposes
- In addition, there is room for disbelief utilizing a natural process (hence why some people are atheists), while still great capacity for appreciation of the immense beauty and complexity of nature and life, whether a believer or nonbeliever
Also, the Earth has never been scientifically validated to be a moving oblate spheroid.
That is an excellent question. And the answer is: HELL TO THE NO! You can't have your cake and eat it, too.
God said "let there be light" . Then poof, there was light. Sounds like a big bang to me.
It’s not. Do you know the originator of big bang? I use to believe that and was proven wrong.
So just a theory and im no expert. But, what if we are only counting the days He did work. Mean on day 1 He created light, then waited till the earth was ready for His second day, and then waited till it was ready for the third day. Sure he only did six days of actual work, but how many days, or years passed between each work day.
No evidence i can point to for this theory one way or another. But, it would make sense to only document the days He actually worked. As nothing beyond the 7 day of rest is mentioned about God, about His future works, being on a timeline like genesis. For example like on day blah, blah, He spoke with Moses. I get creation was important to explain in a timeline, but after creation, all measurements of time are done by years of the people of the bible.
God, being eternal, time is irrelevant to Him, so waiting one day, or a billion years between work days makes no difference. I dont know i just dont understand the need to make God fit into our concept of time, days, and years. A day for God, could be an eternity to us. We are not the same and time doesnt apply to us the way it does to Him, if at all.
(^^)d This is an artistic proof of a created universe. When you paint a shadow it's the opposite color of the object that made the shadow. Nobody knew what the opposite color of white was so the artists avoided painting white on white. The opposite color of white is baby blue and baby pink. The first artist to figure it out was Norman Rockwell. I was the second artist to figure it out. I saw it in the corner of a white room. The lighting was perfect to see it.
You didn't mention the ice canopy that existed until the time of Noah.
And then you take Archeology and they let you know we can't date more than 55,000 years back...
Such intelligence and not see the Flat Earth? Shame
T-Rex, the alligator of its time.
I believe the Bible entirely. The atmosphere before the flood was entirely different from the atmosphere after the flood.
I agree it’s supernatural, stop trying to figure God out, He is God!
Darwin denied on his deathbed he denounced
_According To Scriptures:_
We're living on the THIRD iteration of earth.
1. The Kingdom of YHWH (destroyed)
2. The Pre-Flood (destroyed)
3. The Post-Flood (will be destroyed)
There will be ONE MORE iteration that is After YHWH returns & reclaims this rock.
This is kind of like mathematicians and how they will make an equation fit any scenario ¿`_
Water above is talking about space dude
no THEY DO NOT. UNFORTUNATELY.
they think the earth is only a few thousand years old because they apply a day to a thousand years moto, which is wrong because a day to a thousand years only apply for prophecies. but when Yehowah says a day i like a thousand years and a thousand years like a day its talking Metaphor speech as he could have say a blllion years is like a day and a day like a billion years. he was talking in a language of the day ordinary people could grasp. in our days we understand billions and trillions and so forth. search that only a thousand years to a day and vice versa apply only in prophecies. the earth is at least at a minimum 7 billion years.
You have no proof of that. Zero
@@webstercat i am the living proof that Yehowah gave me understanding and not to you.
@@webstercat lol
This guy said the sun was created on day one. The bible CLEARLY states it was created on day four. Glenn Beck is Mormon. I dunno if this guy is too, but I don't listen to followers of Joseph Smith. I listen to Jesus Christ, and he referred to Genesis literally.
Please don't committ ad hominem. Assess the argument itself, not the person. Being wrong on some things doesn't make them wrong on others. I'm LDS and happen to agree with you that the sun was created later
When did Jesus refer to Genesis literally?
Is it possible you dismiss Joseph Smith as a false prophet since you've heard primarily heard caricatures, strawmen, falsehoods, and cherry-picked “doctrine”? Historian Don Bradley initially thought he was a fraud, largely due to polygamy, until discovering his sincerity in the historical record. He was reluctant to institute it to raise up seed and hated to cause his first wife Emma so much pain
How donyou explain the flood? God put the planetary objects in the sky for season.
600M years? Lmao
Of course there's no conflict between god created everything in 6 days 6,000 years ago and a self creating universe producing a planet on which life evolved over 3.5 billion years without a god. If there's a conflict I just can't see it.
The Bible states the earth was void and without form before God decided to do something with it. Meaning there is no claim in the Bible that the earth is 5000-6000 years old. Those numbers should be used to interpret the generations of Adam. this universe is simply expanding into Infinty, Gods place of residence, and is nothing more than a painters canvas in which God is the artist. He decides when to paint, where to paint, how the story begins,ends and believe me he has all the time in Infinity to work his masterpiece. Without God you’re nothing more than a particle of dust and only because his choice was to create and love you are you anything more.