Apollo 11 Lunar Landing | Flashback | NBC News
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 15 сен 2024
- The Huntley-Brinkley Report from July 21st, 1969 following the successful landing of Apollo 11 on the lunar surface and man's first steps on the moon.
» Subscribe to NBC News: nbcnews.to/Subs...
» Watch next Flashback: bit.ly/GOPGoldw...
NBC News is a leading source of global news and information. Here you will find clips from NBC Nightly News, Meet The Press, and our original series Debunker, Flashback, Nerdwatch, and Show Me. Subscribe to our channel for news stories, technology, politics, health, entertainment, science, business, and exclusive NBC investigations.
Connect with NBC News Online!
Visit NBCNews.Com: nbcnews.to/ReadNBC
Find NBC News on Facebook: nbcnews.to/LikeNBC
Follow NBC News on Twitter: nbcnews.to/Foll...
Follow NBC News on Google+: nbcnews.to/PlusNBC
Follow NBC News on Instagram: nbcnews.to/Inst...
Follow NBC News on Pinterest: nbcnews.to/PinNBC
Apollo 11 Lunar Landing | Flashback | NBC News
![Baby Kia - GLOVES & DRACS (BLACK AF1s) [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/ajm8LeB0qQk/mqdefault.jpg)
My granda said the old lady next door said when she heard it, "You would have thought they would have waited until it was a full moon."
lol
😂😂😂
😂
Turns out she was deiceved , a true conspiracy between government, media and many more involved
Spare a thought for the poor camera person left on the moon recording the lift off with such accuracy. 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Yep!!!!
BOGUS As All Get 0ut!!!
and the moment he jumped off the capsule to stamp his tri foot into the ground to get a steady shot of the actual astronauts... so he must have been the first one to set foot on the moon and we have all been duped to think it was Armstrong hahahaha and he ain't even claiming publicity for it.. what a good soul hahaha
🤣🤣🤣🤣
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Right, because they didn't invent tripods yet
That’s one small step for a man, and one giant leap for mankind.
No step and one big lie
@@hungsolow7090- You are so wrong, it's laughable. This 7/21/1969 landing was tracked all the way to the moon (and back) by several nations. It was televised live for everyone to witness. Furthermore, there were additional landings, and these are all well-documented. Currently, SpaceX is planning its Artemis team for a new visit. You are woefully ignorant.
Are you a troll?
@@hungsolow7090 says mr nobody on the internet
The transistor was invented in 1947, the first handheld transistor radio was sold to the public during Christmas 1954. The integrated circuit was invented in 1958. Everything was state of the art of the time on Apollo.
I was told quite the opposite, the computers were to be made simple and duplicated for backup systems. reliability over speed was the plan.
And Nixon called the moon on a landline. 😂😂😂😂
In 2024 I still loose coverage on my cell phone.
@@rbnjr How do you think that is opposite.
@@Scottiepups Right, the first computer had about 17,000 tubes, the transistor replaced the tube and the first handheld transistor radio was sold in 1954 and had 4 transistors. The current iPhone 15 has 19 billion transistors in it.
@@Scottiepups Before fibreoptics, microwave network links spanned the country. President Nixon’s ‘phone call’ to the astronauts was a patch in, set up in advance over microwave link between Washington and Mission Control in Houston, then out via microwave link to the Deep Space Network, then up to whichever DSN station had the moon in view at the time.
The transmitters used in space have exponentially greater power than the few milliwatts of a household wi-fi router, using a high gain receiver and directed focused antenna arrays. The Apollo radio transmissions broadcast at 20 watts, to a dish that was 65 feet in diameter which reduced the amount of battery power needed by the lunar module.
They also had line of sight, i.e. there was no obstruction between the Earth and Moon.
A cell phone transmits 300-600 milliwatts to a 2-foot-long antenna and has towers to bounce signals off when there is no line of sight. They also have millions of other users that compete for bandwidth. Thus, depending on how many users there are, and whether there are enough towers to connect the signals, you might not get any service. They are entirely different scenarios.
I wish they would do another live moon landing in hd, that would be awesome
It would be impossible. They said they forgot how...
They are. NASA is training the next set of astronauts now I think
@@duncanbrown0 The first crewed Artemis mission is planned for November, 2024. It will be a flyby, with landing missions to follow.
This was faked. Y’all late smh 🤣
@@gennifertorres156 no, it wasn't. And that's not my "opinion," it's objectively provable fact.
If you listen close...it sounds like he says..." one small step for man, one defiant leap for mankind."
I think that's just radio static messing with the audio
@@lmottb1041 it is radio static. He just said it "sounds like"
If you chop it up... ONE Gi-Ant leap... it wasn't 3 chops.... one De-fi-ant... it was 2 chops... it was giant leap....
It's 51 years after as I'm watching it in 2021
And they still have yet to return. Hmmm
E
@@jonathanmcmenemy103 manned missions cost more than sending rovers. Hmmmmmm
@@jonathanmcmenemy103
Kenny Ben T McKormic Since you're "obviously" an expert on video and motion picture technology that was available in 1969 please tell us all how the moon landings were faked.
How was 143 minutes of continuous video depicting Armstrong and Aldrin shuffling around on the moon faked and how 1/6th lunar gravity was simulated? While slow motion video was available in 1969, the video was taken with a hand-held camera. Using film shot at high speed to simulate 1/6th gravity was possible, but a 14-inch diameter 16mm film magazine containing 1,600 ft of film lasts about 48 minutes. The video is continuous. Even if multiple cameras had been used differences in emulsion would have been detected. Additionally, later missions were in color with a higher video frame rate.
At the time of the broadcast, magnetic disk recorders capable of storing slow motion footage could only capture 30 seconds in total, for a playback of 90 seconds of slow-motion video. To capture 143 minutes in slow motion, you’d need to record and store 47 minutes of live action, which simply wasn’t possible.
How did astronaut David Scott manage to get a hammer and a falcon feather to drop at the same rate corresponding to the "faked" 1/6th lunar gravity during the "fake" Apollo 15 mission?
The technology to fake the moon landing DID NOT EXIST in 1969! It was actually "easier" to build a rocket and GO THERE!
@@mikecrownshaw1646 you’re a shill.
So wouldn't the camera man be the first man on the moon? Why haven't we been back?
You can't be serious, can you?
No dear. Not only the camera but the lighting crew as well who put the massive studio lights up as well.
Buzz Aldrin said it was an annimation .. there was no one to film them up der
@@djhago3123 Buzz never said that.
@@pf8951Yes he did, ruclips.net/video/1Y30VAkHtdw/видео.htmlsi=3CWf8ZObOX2t_yKq
"50 years from now. they will be very dumb and think that the moonland was fake.and the earth is flat."
You’re so smart
@@DaPoopIsInDaPudding ikr
@@DaPoopIsInDaPudding Do you believe that covid19 vaccines have microchip technology from Bill Gates and Illuminati?? 😂😂😂
They will also think Saddam Hussein had WMDs !
Oops, wait...
@@goofygrandlouis6296 whataboutism fallacy
If Neil was the first one down the ladder, who was outside holding the camera?
😂
There was a camera on the arm
The BBC'
Stanley Kubrick
Alex jones was the camera man
It’s 2023 and I still can’t send a video clip by email without using wattsap
1:09 that line still gives me goosebumps everytime
wasn’t it crazy how it was all here on earth great performance from the actors at nasa
@@connrgg maybe so, but the line overall shows how far we’ve come has human beings.
shoutout to Stanley Kubrick
@@connrggit was on the moon
It took them 4 days from launch to landing but here in 2024 it takes over 30 days. WE NEVER WENT TO THE MOON PEOPLE. it's impossible today for humans to leave earth orbit
50 years later and Armstrong has no interviews!
Cause he can't think of a lie, that's why
Edgard Martinez Oh my another one!!! Yes he did in his later life do interviews. Look on RUclips there's loads. What a humble, shy and courageous gentlemen he was. Sadly from the generation of men who have now become on the brink of extinction.
@@juliaread2003 A Humble man? He was a Liar!
@@juliaread2003 look at thay flag waving in the wind.....😅🤣😂
@@chaboi7 The flag wasn't waving, it had an extra pole on top of it so it would look like it's waving.
Imagine being alive and watching the first humans go to the moon. I was born 8 years later into a completely different world.
On That Date: July 21, 1969: During The Apollo 11's Lunar Landing, Houston Said: "Columbia, This Is Houston Radio Loud And Clear Over"
the production , acting , lighting .. perfect :D bravo!!!
Well of course, Kubrick always does good work
Exactly…there’s no way this is the moon
hollywood's best production so far
@@theplacebeyondthelies2429 If you think the US Government is capable of fooling the world then you are just fooling yourself. Wake up yourself, sheep.
True- it impossible to relay live coverage from the moon today- the signal just can’t travel that far - forget about 1969
If Armstrong was the first person on the moon, who recorded the landing? 😑🎥📼🎞️
An exterior camera mounted on an apparatus would be logical.
Stanley Kubrick
Excecly .. This is so Fake I can't believe people still fall for this
When Neil Armstrong came down the ladder, he pulled a lever that deployed the camera.
@@FirstLast-xi6vz The commander of the Apollo flight pulls a D ring on the porch. On his left side of the LM the MESA deploys and the LM Pilot flips the circuit breaker to turn on the TV camera pointing at the ladder.
We had High HD pic of the flag being planted in our text book 😂
Why is that funny? just curious.
@@johanngloi8461 u not that bright are you lol
@@jmoneyyy2116 What? I was just questioning him why he had a laughing emoji in his comment. I found nothing funny about it and was just wondering.
They took film camera with them as well as TV cameras. The film cameras are HD and they developed the film when they got back to Earth. How do you think they have those HD pictures of Earth from space? Film cameras! They work fine in space.
There are 2 types of people in the world. Those who think we landed on the moon, and those who think.
3 types, those who have telescopes too
3 types... those with >7yr old brains.
There are 2 types of people in the world. Those who don’t think we landed on the Moon, and those who think.
^fixed your typo for you, you’re welcome.
@@dalesajdak422 lol sure bud believe what you like.
What kind of wireless phone did Nixon use to talk to people on the moon?
Tricky dickie. My middle name is Richard too, Richard lol.
Lol, ikr? 😂
[ we donot know for sure, but we can with almost 100% say, that it was not a Huawei. Perhaps a bleckberry or Nokia. 😂]
Your ignarance is fascinating, keep it up!!
IPhone of course 😜
2020, and still looking back at this historic event.
They faked it though, if you look closely there isn’t stars in the sky, space would obviously have stars-
There’s also a bunch more evidence but I’ll take you down a whole rabbit whole
Hole*
@NoTheEarthIsntFlat Uh, why is the flag waving then? That’s nit support to happen.
Not*
Wow in the moon the Astronauts become see-thru
hat is a product of the video camera tube they used called a Vidicon.
Yeah right Nixon talking to them on phone with no delay 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Edgard Martinez Put your headphones in. THERE IS a delay !!!! I give up !
@@juliaread2003 The delay should be 12 SECONDS! DO YOU UNDERSTAND!?
@@hotheadedjoelhaha The moon is 1 second-light away.
@@pedrosmith221 It's a lot Closer than that! Do you really think it is 250,000 miles away? Does it Look like it?
@@hotheadedjoelhaha
Yes, I am _positive_ that the Moon is on average 238,000 miles away. What makes you think it’s not?
Such a relief to find out that it was filmed in a basement😌😌
Staying on the topic of basement, get out of yours.
You're full of jokes
Since you're "obviously" an expert on video and motion picture technology that was available in 1969 please tell us all how the moon landings were faked.
How was 143 minutes of continuous video depicting Armstrong and Aldrin shuffling around on the moon faked and how 1/6th lunar gravity was simulated? While slow motion video was available in 1969, the video was taken with a hand-held camera. Using film shot at high speed to simulate 1/6th gravity was possible, but a 14-inch diameter 16mm film magazine containing 1,600 ft of film lasts about 48 minutes. The video is continuous. Even if multiple cameras had been used differences in emulsion would have been detected. Additionally, later missions were in color with a higher video frame rate.
At the time of the broadcast, magnetic disk recorders capable of storing slow motion footage could only capture 30 seconds in total, for a playback of 90 seconds of slow-motion video. To capture 143 minutes in slow motion, you’d need to record and store 47 minutes of live action, which simply wasn’t possible.
How did astronaut David Scott manage to get a hammer and a falcon feather to drop at the same rate corresponding to the "faked" 1/6th lunar gravity during the "fake" Apollo 15 mission?
The technology to fake the moon landing DID NOT EXIST in 1969! It was actually "easier" to build a rocket and GO THERE!
I hope we live the same thing with Mars, I hope I can see that one Day
wake up
@@theplacebeyondthelies2429 i hope.
I know it's impossible u c o u nt
It's not possible for man to live on Mars.
@@Lyns777 we all know that our body or anatomy its evolved because our gravity etc etc. But, come on juts imagine.
@@graw211 we were created by our creator. God said let there be light.
And there was light.
God set two lights in the firmament, the greater and lesser light.
Greater sun, lesser moon.
Firmament, means solid.
That means something solid cannot be penetrated.
This is the greatest deception to mankind.
The devil is a liar...
Jesus is the one who died for our sin.
He is the way, the truth and the life.
We never landed to the moon. We never went to space. Sorry that the masses have been lied to. “It’s easier to fool a person then to convince a person they were fooled”
You’re not serious
it was an unbelievable feat with extraordinary evidence to prove it actually happened, because it did.
The astronaut was looking transparent from 4:40 to 5:18
like to videos over lapping yeah?
Old tapes and cameras did that if they got worn, the last frames would start to bind together i think.
It’s called image lag. You could look it up if you really wanted to know.
Yeah it happens because of green screen...lmao just joking... It would be harder to fake a moon landing than actually landing on the moon
@@Zain0_0 it's not green screen, it's a movie set.
Love how the film is very clear... and no radiation interferance at all.
Pretty good film tech for the time....
It was slowscan TV that was shown live.
sure we focus on the filming tech rather than the actual physics of going to space with our human bodies and what lethal consequences it has even with these ridiculous space suits... no man has ever walked the moon
@@theplacebeyondthelies2429 Your lack of Scientific and Engineering knowledge does you no good. You need to study more to understand some basics. You are way off the mark.
@@TJMoir ok lets get down to it and we will see who lacks what, cause like this your accusation is ridiculous, makes me think you're a paid actor just here to defend the lies! no engineering can escape basic physical laws, and these are clear. You can build the coolest rockets in a barn and brag about your engineering all you want, if they ain't going to the moon because of physics they ain't goin
@@theplacebeyondthelies2429 That's because you misunderstand physical laws! Your ignorance astounds me. Have you ever studied engineering or science in your life?
It takes about 2 seconds for radio waves to travel to the Moon and back. I guess they edited this conversation live.
It is faaaaar more difficult to fake it with 1960s tech.
But they did
We never know the full power of our technology. Plus the moon is larger than that.
The crappy video quality kinda makes it seem fake whether it's real or not haha. It's like the same grainy camera footage you see with all the "bigfoot sightings" etc lol.
They give us technology in reverse all the stuff is outdated they have technology that’s 100s of years ahead of time
Since you're "obviously" an expert on video and motion picture technology that was available in 1969 please tell us all how the moon landings were faked.
How was 143 minutes of continuous video depicting Armstrong and Aldrin shuffling around on the moon faked and how 1/6th lunar gravity was simulated? While slow motion video was available in 1969, the video was taken with a hand-held camera. Using film shot at high speed to simulate 1/6th gravity was possible, but a 14-inch diameter 16mm film magazine containing 1,600 ft of film lasts about 48 minutes. The video is continuous. Even if multiple cameras had been used differences in emulsion would have been detected. Additionally, later missions were in color with a higher video frame rate.
At the time of the broadcast, magnetic disk recorders capable of storing slow motion footage could only capture 30 seconds in total, for a playback of 90 seconds of slow-motion video. To capture 143 minutes in slow motion, you’d need to record and store 47 minutes of live action, which simply wasn’t possible.
How did astronaut David Scott manage to get a hammer and a falcon feather to drop at the same rate corresponding to the "faked" 1/6th lunar gravity during the "fake" Apollo 15 mission?
The technology to fake the moon landing DID NOT EXIST in 1969! It was actually "easier" to build a rocket and GO THERE!
Imagine you go to the moon ? Would you react like that no excitement and no emotion in the there voice I'll lose my mind
these guys were all military before going to NASA...discipline. I agree though, I'd be flipping out
@@michaelengle9062 bro it’s the moon. You’re not going to b that discipline. You would lose your mind landing on another planet. That’s us fake.
Also, pro at walking and balancing with the moon gravity. Every time they lift their foot a good amount of dust bounces up in the air n falls back exactly like on earth.
These guys had work to do, they didn’t have time to sit and admire (maybe a bit of time, which they used)
@@ritizasentertainmentchanne9622 Exactly, nevermind that's not how sand and dirt behave under water on earth, with effectively reduced gravity (buoyancy). The dust should have kicked up in a cloud that obscured everything for 20 minutes
25 billions dollars of wasted money. Wtf do we need to know about the moon.
probably the best 25 billion we have ever spent
@@jerryham5659 how?
@@eh9135It wasn't "wasted" but we probably didn't need to spend the money at the time to do it. I'm just saying spending money on space travel is a generally good thing
@@jerryham5659 still no need but I get it
@@eh9135 I see
What I do not understand is that how can the flag move without air on moon right and left which drives me to believe it was directed in studio.!
What would be making the flag move right and left in a studio.
The flag only moves when they handle the flagpole. When the astronauts set up the flagpole they wiggle the flagpole and their actions made the flag move, that's all. Otherwise it didn't move.
@@mikep9604
There's video showing it moving on its own without anyone touching it.
This has been explained time and time again! But I guess some people just want to see and learn what they choose to see and learn. Besides, WHY would there be wind in a studio? And WHY would they air it? 😂😂
@@jaasonmiller I will try to see it...
Why don’t they go back, ya know, just to prove they can actually do it. You know why.
Because it cost $25,400,000,000?
Right?
@@dansv1 suuuuuure. They have no problem wasting money on other things of less significance. Plus the original trip wasn’t free now was it.
@@DaPoopIsInDaPudding well yes, that tells you their priorities. But they still did it then.
@@dansv1 they waste that amount annually on foreign aids...small price to pay to prove they actually went to the moon.
Wait how did they go live from the moon in 1969 🧐 they barley that tech in 1980
Radio waves transmitted the video.
Boy the moon sure is windy! ...but where is the “landing” footage??
DansGone they brought the camera and set up a tripod, prior to their landing the camera wasn’t on the moon because they brought it...
Imagine having a life so empty and meaningless that you waste precious time and energy on believing this didn’t really happen.
Imagine thinking that tiny, thin, rickety thing landed on the moon, in the one spot that was lit up lol with perfect tv and telephone signal, and then they unpacked a dune buggy, thats bigger than the ship i might add, drove it around, packed it back up and lifted off again
Imagine not having any imagination and just blindly believing what you are told
Imagine thinking Van Allen Belt isn't real
Far-right wing hypocrites continue to attack science people for being "sheep" while they blindly believe everything uttered by Faux News, conspiracy videos, and by the walking talking cheeto puff who was in the oval office for 4 years and has no degree in science.
@@aqilshamil9633
@j0nGka26 and
@jirtz5
@@jirtz5what do you expect to land on the moon? Your logic doesn’t make sense. You want a thick 1000 ton mega spacecraft to land on the moon? That’s not how it works
I don’t think the flag was moving because of wind or ventilation of some kind. Maybe it was moving due to the force applied to it. When the 2nd astronaut tugged on it, it moved just as a flag does but stayed in position.
Yes,thats what ive been thinking of
Congrats you got physics
@@captainobvious6668 thanks, been struggling with it since second grade
there is movement in space.
@@paulinegallagher7821 yes that’s what I’m saying, im just saying it for those who think it’s wind
Why was the moon so dark but yet so much light can reach half our world at once😆🤷🏻♂️?
Some of today's young people cant believe that much of anything is real since CG and AI has gotten so advanced. Sad...a major downside of modern technology.
Stanley Kubrick did a great job with these shots!
Yep! And the billions of dollars spent on it were all fake too!
Kubrick was drunk when he did this movie.
hoax
hoax forever
If Neil Armstrong was the first man to step on the moon, who placed the camera and took the photo?
Deployable camera
People, just think about it. If it was filmed INSIDE a studio, there would be no air blowing either. And I don't think they were so dumb to keep the ventilation on if they wanted to make it look real. How do you explain that?
What about aldrin saying it was an animation
Thank you 🙏🏼 someone with sense 😂 how anyone can think this is real? I don’t know 🙈
@@happydays2190 bruh he said that it was an animation because it was. The audio was 100% real from the moon but the footage was only released a few days after. Tv stations had to use the audio to portray what was happening on the moon through tiny figures
@@lxre6763 uhhhh no. The lander had a small monochrome TV camera stowed in the MESA compartment in the lunar lander, which broadcasted the footage LIVE to Mission Control in Houston at which point they were broadcast to the world. The translation process left the image significantly degraded, but it was still live footage of man’s first steps on the Moon. It also wasn't tiny figures as if they were, then the footage would've had to been slowed down to be made realistic, but 1., it is still possible to tell, and 2., in the footage you can see it isn't slowed down what so ever.
I'm sure you can vacuum a sealed room to have some simulated environment.
Who shot the video of neil first step on the moon while buzz was still inside the lunar lander ?😂
The camera was mounted on a wheeled module, which exited the capsule first.
The camera was mounted on a device that protruded from the LM called the “MESA” Modular Electronics Stowage Assembly
The “Mesa” modular electronics stowage assembly…took Armstrong’s first steps …grow a brain
@@DaveyWest1968 lol we used to say "grow a brain cell" LOL
@@jillhomer3879 After landing as Armstrong descended the ladder, he opened a panel on the descent stage of the lunar module to the left of the foot of the ladder, by pulling a cord. As the flap came down like a drawbridge, it revealed a tv camera which took the footage. After about half an hour the camera was removed from the landing leg and placed on a tripod further away for the television transmission to Earth.
A 16mm colour movie camera (fixed on a bracket) was used from inside the cockpit of the lunar module, on descent and lift off, and for some footage of the moonwalks.
I saw this in a school portable.....the old black & white t.v on that big stand on wheels.....rabbit ears, one with a foil ball on it.
I strictly came to this video to say we didn’t go to the moon. By the time we finally were able to successfully launch the rocket off the ground, Russia already had over 100 hours in space they had a satellite in space, and not to mention, they put a monkey in space, Russia also successfully shot a rocket to the Moon unmanned, but it did not make it back so here we are in the middle of a space race with Russia, and we can’t even get a rocket off the ground. But that glorious day finally came and we were able to get a rocket off the ground and one month later we sent two men to the moon the miracle of the story is, they were able to fly these men through the radiation rings around the earth safely when the rocket was not equipped, with the right protection to go through the radiation. Also, when the astronauts are recording earth from inside of the rocket, they’re using techniques to make it look like they are extremely far from earth but the reality is that earth was taking up their whole entire window view because they were just outside of it not on their way to the moon. My favorite got your point is how Neil Armstrong still till this day refuses to do an interview we can’t blame the astronauts they are standup guys but they were put in the middle of a government scam. These guys want to so bad come out and tell you but they won’t, I’ve seen videos of them swinging on people because they told them they did not go to the moon and if they did go to the moon, they would swear on the Bible not solid evidence but these men had morals and standards hence why they will not just lie and put their hand on the Bible. There’s plenty of other loopholes in the moon landing that we can easily identify nowadays with the 20th century, technology and logic we have we are no longer just subject to a TV or radio that is possibly controlled. We now have open discussion stuff like the Internet, which helps us gain an understanding if we know how to dig.
A lot of what you wrote is not factual.
The first US rocket that put a satellite into orbit was more than 11 years before the first moon landing.
Russia was the first to land an unmanned spacecraft on the moon. Russia was the first to send live animals around the moon and safely return them to Earth. Russia also collected lunar soil with 3 separate sample return missions to the moon.
Neil Armstrong hated fame and publicity, but he did at least 6 interviews. You can watch them.
Three astronauts did swear on a Bible they walked on the moon.
Hi shawn, you wrote. "But that glorious day finally came and we were able to get a rocket off the ground and one month later we sent two men to the moon". Basically, you don't have a clue what you are talking about, do you? Take care.
There is no way that it was REAL TIME broadcasting with so much noise and so much data being transmitted from moon surface to moon orbit, to earth, to broadcasting stations and to millions of homes. If it is delayed processed broadcasting, I would let it go, as very short burst of data (such as seconds of video or even just pictures) can be sent back and processed. And that is very short segment of videos and pictures. But REAL TIME CONINTUOUS BORADCASTING? Come on!
Yeah, radio is an amazing thing, that somehow has you completely baffled.
@@stevetheveteran You are kidding me right? That is real time video signal capturing and broadcasting from Moon Surface to Moon Orbit to Earth. It is not simple radio.
@@stevetheveteran Even today, the moon rovers and mars rovers could only do simple Still Pictures. And the IC chips in those rovers are hundreds of times, if not thousands of times, more powerful than those Vaccuum tubes and mechanical switches.
@@jkuang I know!! Radio signals hard!!! So landing must be fake!!! Because Jin can't understand!!!!
@@stevetheveteran You don't need to ridicule. I am saying it one more time, there is no way they could do REAL TIME VIDEO SIGNAL broadcasting from that life supporting module.
Camera quality is why we can't go back now because people would clearly see that it's fake Mars looks exactly like everybody thought it would how convenient
Are you saying we didn’t go to Mars. I worked on Project Viking at Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena. I saw the first image from the surface of Mars come up on the monitor. It took three passes on the monitor for the color image to appear. A black and white camera took three images for each photo using a red filter, a blue filter and a green filter. Then the imagine processing computer translated the three images converting the grey pixels to color pixels based upon the filter that was used for each image.
So many people on social media say the moon landing is fake and never happened. Although I wasn't born yet, I'm still convinced this event is real.
The greatest space story is the one about the
American astronauts traveling to the
Moon and walking on it for the first time.
you mean the greatest Hollywood sci fi
Stanley Kubrick did a great job.
@@theplacebeyondthelies2429😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
brothers grimm stories are nothing against this fairytale
Felling bad for laika😡😡😡😡
Can’t believe I believed this for so many years 😵💫
I cant belive people like you still exist.
Why is it so hard to believe they went to the moon?
@@illpunchyouintheface9094 see the footage again the flag is waving (there is no winds on the moon) ...... the lights ... and the camera .
Since you're "obviously" an expert on video and motion picture technology that was available in 1969 please tell us all how the moon landings were faked.
How was 143 minutes of continuous video depicting Armstrong and Aldrin shuffling around on the moon faked and how 1/6th lunar gravity was simulated? While slow motion video was available in 1969, the video was taken with a hand-held camera. Using film shot at high speed to simulate 1/6th gravity was possible, but a 14-inch diameter 16mm film magazine containing 1,600 ft of film lasts about 48 minutes. The video is continuous. Even if multiple cameras had been used differences in emulsion would have been detected. Additionally, later missions were in color with a higher video frame rate.
At the time of the broadcast, magnetic disk recorders capable of storing slow motion footage could only capture 30 seconds in total, for a playback of 90 seconds of slow-motion video. To capture 143 minutes in slow motion, you’d need to record and store 47 minutes of live action, which simply wasn’t possible.
How did astronaut David Scott manage to get a hammer and a falcon feather to drop at the same rate corresponding to the "faked" 1/6th lunar gravity during the "fake" Apollo 15 mission?
The technology to fake the moon landing DID NOT EXIST in 1969! It was actually "easier" to build a rocket and GO THERE!
Imagine being this stupid
Those lunar winds were terrible that day
?
Winds? Where??
Questions need to be answered. How did the cameraman film the spaceship land and take off?
5:07 is the Astronot transparent? 😮
No
that flag was definitely waving, right? right?
time stamp?
@@JamesWilson-wy7ys around 4:06
Who are you going to believe -- NASA or your lying eyes?
No it wasn’t waving. It was moving because the astronauts touched it. If you look at some of the longer videos it never moves after it was set up.
The truth is: This video was fake, it just seems so real because it was recorded at the original location xD
I would love to go back in time, bring Copernicus, Galileo, and Da Vinci to this point and see this, just to hear them all collectively say "I f**king knew it!!!"
They knew a Hollywood production could fool the masses? I guess they were the OG truthers.
@@liberatethegodseeds2001 🙄
@@liberatethegodseeds2001 Ignoramus
I can’t get cell coverage in spots but Nixon called the moon on a landline 😂😂😂👊🏻
No, Houston called Nixon on a landline and patched in the radio transmission.
@@petersearls4443 it is BS. You can’t maintain cell coverage in 2023 in rural areas. Not to mention a craft getting past the Van Allen belts. People were naive. Technology today proves it wasn’t possible then and it is t now.
Like Musk saying he is going to g to have people on Mars. How does he plan to build cities up there? Will he be sending excavating equipment up in a space ship? “Professing to be wise they prove themselves fools”. Romans 1:22
@@Scottiepups Dr Van Allen himself said the belts were non-lethal when traversed at the right velocity. And does your phone have a 30 story tall antenna attached to it? No? Ok then, false equivalence fallacy. Your worthless buy-bull verse refutes squat.
@@Aurora666_yt if you believe we landed on the moon you are sad & pitiful .
@@Scottiepups The other way around. If you believe the moon landing was faked, then not only are you sad and pitiful, you're a massive ignoramus on top of that.
How can they transmitt signals back to earth which is thousands of kilometers from the moon? And with the low technology at that time? Someone please answer me
Radio.
CIA … simple.
Theres a video of some guy from nbc explaining how the moonlanding was broadcasted live to hundreds of millions of viewers. I think its all cap.
I'm not sure it was true
its not true .. dont be deceive. its easy to film and make people believe during 70's but not now so that they cant cheat to us anymore
It is true, it happened
Maybe we really did land on the moon, but if they lied about it, I wouldnt be surprised
well if you look closely the flag was waving which btw there is no air on the moon.
@tsunami of the tsunami It doesn't seem like it
@@elninolaroi8756
If you watch the video of the entire EVA, the flag does not move at all in the three hours after they stop touching the flag pole.
Check it out here: ruclips.net/video/S9HdPi9Ikhk/видео.html
@@dansv1 Yeah I changed my opinion some long time ago
@@elninolaroi8756 than they cut the camera, replaced it with a stiffer flag that doesn't move and started filming again
hold up, how did Armstrong walk over there set the camera, then record his vlog
He didn't set the camera. The camera was already installed on the side of the Lunar Module descent stage. The camera pointed towards the ladder and filmed him climbing down.
They already use 10G wireless tech
Bizarre how the flag was flying like wind was blowing and then all of a sudden it was just two astronauts with any motion. No wonder NASA calimijg to have lost all recording and data related to it.
If you give something motion, it will stay in that said repeating motion forever.
@@poglup1551 is that so? Does it keep going back and forth for ever. I didnt know that it is possible in space. I though given a force it moves in one direction. I guess US flag will keep flying in the moon forever.
How could they have " lost all recording" when you are actually watching the footage?
@@kabirabdulhai4848 Fun Fact. Walt Disney died in December 1966, some two and a half years before the Apollo 11 launch. Then again research and facts were never really the forte of the reality denier. Take care. .
@@TheWokeFlatEarthTruthprobably got it from some conspiracy theory twitter post
Why trip was more focus on the American ego then the moon it self.
Lol it's all about control
space race
@@thenigerianjew1698 ur definitely a FLAT Earther
@@Alex_Aramayo I'm not
@@thenigerianjew1698 ik, u just sound like 1 bc u mentioned "control"
Landed on the moon in 1970 but can’t go back today, hmmm seems reasonable but they want to go to mars and make a meta world
Since you're "obviously" an expert on video and motion picture technology that was available in 1969 please tell us all how the moon landings were faked.
How was 143 minutes of continuous video depicting Armstrong and Aldrin shuffling around on the moon faked and how 1/6th lunar gravity was simulated? While slow motion video was available in 1969, the video was taken with a hand-held camera. Using film shot at high speed to simulate 1/6th gravity was possible, but a 14-inch diameter 16mm film magazine containing 1,600 ft of film lasts about 48 minutes. The video is continuous. Even if multiple cameras had been used differences in emulsion would have been detected. Additionally, later missions were in color with a higher video frame rate.
At the time of the broadcast, magnetic disk recorders capable of storing slow motion footage could only capture 30 seconds in total, for a playback of 90 seconds of slow-motion video. To capture 143 minutes in slow motion, you’d need to record and store 47 minutes of live action, which simply wasn’t possible.
How did astronaut David Scott manage to get a hammer and a falcon feather to drop at the same rate corresponding to the "faked" 1/6th lunar gravity during the "fake" Apollo 15 mission?
The technology to fake the moon landing DID NOT EXIST in 1969! It was actually "easier" to build a rocket and GO THERE!
prove to me how its real
4:51 Weird, he got all see through for no reason.
That is a product of the video camera tube they used called a Vidicon.
Such a shame we no longer have the technology to land on the moon today. Sigh
*Who was filming behind the camera?*
Right
[ Spider man. ]
Mr Spock
Stanley Kubrick
i..you know what a tripod is right..?
From 5:01 to 5:14 you can see a ghost on the screen or something i don't know
@ManuCarc2000 j 😂😂
Right
Its the tube camera effect.
It's a bad cgi from 1969
@@growhax1590 there was no CGI in 1969
4:46 Why is the Astronaut transparent?
Image lag. It was an issue that all video cameras using the vidicon tube had.
The ‘ghosting’ effect on the Apollo 11 film footage whereby it seems you can see through the astronauts is a well-known feature of a vidicon tube of the kind used on the TV camera. If you point a vidicon tube at a bright object, the screen becomes oversaturated and is still able to remain charged for multiple frames. What was seen was the previous image fading with the new one on top of it.
So he got out and set up a selfie stick before ? 😂
The camera was sealed in a container attached to the leg. Neil turned a latch that unlocked the container allowing the camera to fall out, positioned to cover the ladder. Pretty simple.
Who’s here because of Joe Rogan😂
They people who are denying it, probably.
Whoever believes that we actually landed on the moon needs to get their head checked.
If you don't believe we did, you need to go back to school
i have a hard time believing somebody that went through 4 radiation belts lived to 82 years old
For less than an hour
You room-temperature IQ people seem to not be able to the fathom the fact that not all radiation is dangerous.
Since you're "obviously" an expert on video and motion picture technology that was available in 1969 please tell us all how the moon landings were faked.
How was 143 minutes of continuous video depicting Armstrong and Aldrin shuffling around on the moon faked and how 1/6th lunar gravity was simulated? While slow motion video was available in 1969, the video was taken with a hand-held camera. Using film shot at high speed to simulate 1/6th gravity was possible, but a 14-inch diameter 16mm film magazine containing 1,600 ft of film lasts about 48 minutes. The video is continuous. Even if multiple cameras had been used differences in emulsion would have been detected. Additionally, later missions were in color with a higher video frame rate.
At the time of the broadcast, magnetic disk recorders capable of storing slow motion footage could only capture 30 seconds in total, for a playback of 90 seconds of slow-motion video. To capture 143 minutes in slow motion, you’d need to record and store 47 minutes of live action, which simply wasn’t possible.
How did astronaut David Scott manage to get a hammer and a falcon feather to drop at the same rate corresponding to the "faked" 1/6th lunar gravity during the "fake" Apollo 15 mission?
The technology to fake the moon landing DID NOT EXIST in 1969! It was actually "easier" to build a rocket and GO THERE!
Unlike you NASA has math expertise to find the thinnest parts to fly through.
@@mikecrownshaw1646 666 math 🥱
And to learn through modern technology that the whole thing was a lie.
???
Since you're "obviously" an expert on video and motion picture technology that was available in 1969 please tell us all how the moon landings were faked.
How was 143 minutes of continuous video depicting Armstrong and Aldrin shuffling around on the moon faked and how 1/6th lunar gravity was simulated? While slow motion video was available in 1969, the video was taken with a hand-held camera. Using film shot at high speed to simulate 1/6th gravity was possible, but a 14-inch diameter 16mm film magazine containing 1,600 ft of film lasts about 48 minutes. The video is continuous. Even if multiple cameras had been used differences in emulsion would have been detected. Additionally, later missions were in color with a higher video frame rate.
At the time of the broadcast, magnetic disk recorders capable of storing slow motion footage could only capture 30 seconds in total, for a playback of 90 seconds of slow-motion video. To capture 143 minutes in slow motion, you’d need to record and store 47 minutes of live action, which simply wasn’t possible.
How did astronaut David Scott manage to get a hammer and a falcon feather to drop at the same rate corresponding to the "faked" 1/6th lunar gravity during the "fake" Apollo 15 mission?
The technology to fake the moon landing DID NOT EXIST in 1969! It was actually "easier" to build a rocket and GO THERE!
Two questions: 1) in the age of vacuum tubes, with out IC, how could this small landing module or the orbit module accomplish real time video signal processing and broadcasting from moon to earth? This is technological capability that is still not easily accomplished in IC transistor age! 2) How could a small module with heavy life support systems and limited capacity, could have enough combustion fuel and continued propellant energy to lift this module from moon surface to 300 miles high up in moon orbit.
In 1960s' we did not have the technological and historical PERSPECTIVE, thus we believe whatever the government told us. Now in 2021, we should have known enough that the technology in 1960s should not be able to accomplish the moon landing PLUS return from moon surface. (dropping something on the moon surface does not count). Think! Thank you!
Be reminded, moon gravity is still 1/6 of earth. How much solid fuel needed to make this lift up to 300 miles into moon orbit.
its a hoax
)
We didn't transmit from the moon to million of televisions. The moon footage was transmitted from low FPS, to NASA. which had to convert up the video frame rate to the 30FPS, that was the standard broadcasting of televisions at the time. Also there was a delay of 12.5 seconds between image and conversion. And that does not take account distribution to home TV's, which varies by location.
Most of the technology was specifically created for the Apollo mission by private subcontractors, in this case RCA.
The issue was not really fuel, but distribution of fuel and weight. That is why the LM ascend module looks lopsided.
@@carlossilva5152 You don't get it. There is no way that it is REAL TIME broadcasting with so much noise and so much data being transmitted from moon surface to moon orbit, to earth, to broadcasting stations and to millions of homes. If it is delayed broadcasting, I would let it go, as very short burst of data (such as seconds of video or even just pictures) can be sent back and processed. But REAL TIME CONINTUOUS BORADCASTING? Come on!
This is a very low quality studio production. Where is the video showing the inside of the LEM during descent and ascent.
Sue Kennedy Oh My !!!! Its not on here! Its called editing the ICONIC moments. Nasa has reels and reels of footage in their archives. Nobody is listening to your half baked theroies anymore. They went another 5 times or didn't you know? Probably not. Lots to watch on RUclips. They just got better and better at it. Watch Apollo 17 (Full Trip) before you make false claims that it was all a hoax.
@@juliaread2003 Mankind has never been to the moon. You may believe the lies if you wish.
@@hotheadedjoelhaha well .... soviet ... japan and india tracked and observed the landing with their space stations live so that they cant fake it ... if it was fake then there would have been a third world war you dumbfuck
@@hotheadedjoelhaha it happened.
point a laser at the landing site.
@@nopeeeeee3852 india had a space station in 1969 ?
I thought there was no wind on the moon.
This is a hoax thats why
There isn't.
Newton's First Law: objects at rest will stay at rest, and an object in motion will stay in motion unless acted on by a net external force. In this case, the astronauts are acting on the flag.
There is also no atmosphere to dampen the effects of the astronaut's muscles on the flag.
@@danijruss5195 It's not a hoax, if it was why didn't the Soviets call us out
The flag eventually stops moving once it's momentum wears off.
@@dylan3488 probably sold out $$$$
No delay in transmission. It should take 3 seconds given the distances involved.
they synced it
there was a delay, you can hear it when they talk to Mission control. But not three seconds, less than 2. So what are you saying that its fake? please..
@@paulinegallagher7821 Radio signals can't travel through space safely without any preservation. Radio waves deteriorate through air and air is the safest gas we have. You have thousands of killer gases in space with no radio towers to preserve the signals. Yeah no, not a single word is making it to that aircraft in any intelligible form
@@brainchamber99 lol you don't know what you are talking about
The audio recording was taken on earth, so we are hearing it the same way mission control heard it. There's a delay between Houston speaking and the astronauts responding, but no delay between the astronauts speaking and Houston responding
The Moon is reflecting plasma not a solid object. There is no curvature to be found on the Earth and we’re not here by accident. God is calling you to repent in the name of Jesus Christ while there is still time. Jesus loves you
Being a Christian is ok, even good, but this flat earth plasma moon thing is just taking it too far.
Get a grip on reality and stop living in supernatural fantasy world.
It doesn't even say the earth is flat in the Bible, and nowhere does it mention or describe a dome.
So where do you get this rubbish from?
Why is the flag waving in the wind? There is no wind on the moon.... Then, they cut the scene and come back to the flag not moving at all(most likely because they realized the moving flag was exposing the fact that they're in a studio. They probably replaced it with a completely stiff flag and started shooting again and then the editor thought nobody would notice).
Hey buddy its due to inertia!
there was flag-waving apperatus in the flag
Flags arent affected by gravity either it seems
Because the presence of air is the only thing that allows motion.
Saddens me that idiots like this still exist. It’s basic science. Energy moves through matter you dense cabbage.
Director: Stanley Kubrick (died shortly after admitting this)
Clintons … ?
Source?
He never “admitted” anything related to the Apollo project.
To any one who thinks this is fake my toaster is smarter then you.
Than, not then.
To anyone who thinks this is real, my toaster is smarter than you
If you think your toaster is smarter than me then by rational you have the wilfully blind limp mind of a toenail clipping
Why was the flag grounded in such proximity of the lunar module disregarding the exhaust heat and pressure of the module for its take off upon return? Was there a real take off involved at all after shooting of this footage?
The entire thing is a lie. Man never went to the moon.
fun thing the flag was actually knocked over after they left because of the exhaust and nasa tried to not mention that part.
@@damaskusseraph6046 Lol yea, they were told not to go too far from the ship so they didn’t have a choice of where to put it
@@hotheadedjoelhaha your delusional,
Good one 👍
53 years later......
I heard this was filmed in the Disney Studio
You heard wrong.
@@petersearls4443 Nah a dont think so
When he shoves the flag pole into the ground you can sense when the pole reaches the depth in the ground it was already prepared in advance
“Wow I’m so smart I outsmarted the public”
you watch them prepare it in real time
Can I just say how embarrassing it is to watch this 50 years later and realize that the cameraman had to be the FIRST man on the moon. The camera shots are showing the men coming off of the module. So at what time during all of this did he exit to set up his camera? No stars? We have been lied to. They were very good with their deception. How many other things aren't true that we fell for hook, line and sinker?
Instead of coming to youtube to post nonsense, did you think maybe you could figure out the answers to the issues you mentioned? I'm sure a few minutes of effort would have cleared both of those things up for you.
everything
An exterior camera mounted on an apparatus, is a logical solution.
Since you're "obviously" an expert on video and motion picture technology that was available in 1969 please tell us all how the moon landings were faked.
How was 143 minutes of continuous video depicting Armstrong and Aldrin shuffling around on the moon faked and how 1/6th lunar gravity was simulated? While slow motion video was available in 1969, the video was taken with a hand-held camera. Using film shot at high speed to simulate 1/6th gravity was possible, but a 14-inch diameter 16mm film magazine containing 1,600 ft of film lasts about 48 minutes. The video is continuous. Even if multiple cameras had been used differences in emulsion would have been detected. Additionally, later missions were in color with a higher video frame rate.
At the time of the broadcast, magnetic disk recorders capable of storing slow motion footage could only capture 30 seconds in total, for a playback of 90 seconds of slow-motion video. To capture 143 minutes in slow motion, you’d need to record and store 47 minutes of live action, which simply wasn’t possible.
How did astronaut David Scott manage to get a hammer and a falcon feather to drop at the same rate corresponding to the "faked" 1/6th lunar gravity during the "fake" Apollo 15 mission?
The technology to fake the moon landing DID NOT EXIST in 1969! It was actually "easier" to build a rocket and GO THERE!
Omfg how stupid are you ppl, there are no f*cking stars because the EXPOSURE(big fancy word I know) is turned down, because if it wasn’t, the surface of the moon would be blinding because it is receiving basically unfiltered sunlight right to the surface, so yes, you should be embarrassed
Oh, please, people, with the wireless phone comments. It was made on a landline and patched through the radio. They COULD do that in those days. Heck, we could do it in the 1940s. How do you think Edward R. Murrow reported the Blitz? Through his Android phone?
That's just a little Different than making a call 1/4 MILLION miles away. It Never happened! The question is why do You believe it? Simply because you Want to?
@@hotheadedjoelhaha it's not that different and there was a delay
@@hotheadedjoelhaha Since you're "obviously" an expert on video and motion picture technology that was available in 1969 please tell us all how the moon landings were faked.
How was 143 minutes of continuous video depicting Armstrong and Aldrin shuffling around on the moon faked and how 1/6th lunar gravity was simulated? While slow motion video was available in 1969, the video was taken with a hand-held camera. Using film shot at high speed to simulate 1/6th gravity was possible, but a 14-inch diameter 16mm film magazine containing 1,600 ft of film lasts about 48 minutes. The video is continuous. Even if multiple cameras had been used differences in emulsion would have been detected. Additionally, later missions were in color with a higher video frame rate.
At the time of the broadcast, magnetic disk recorders capable of storing slow motion footage could only capture 30 seconds in total, for a playback of 90 seconds of slow-motion video. To capture 143 minutes in slow motion, you’d need to record and store 47 minutes of live action, which simply wasn’t possible.
How did astronaut David Scott manage to get a hammer and a falcon feather to drop at the same rate corresponding to the "faked" 1/6th lunar gravity during the "fake" Apollo 15 mission?
The technology to fake the moon landing DID NOT EXIST in 1969! It was actually "easier" to build a rocket and GO THERE!
@@mikecrownshaw1646 Oh My! You really fell for the Whole thing, him, line and sinker. Do you know that NASA FULLY ADMITS to Losing Every Speck, Every Inch of Telemetry Data!? Every Inch of Film AND DATA from ALL supposed trips to the Moon!? Astro-NOT Don Petit Admits to this! He States we CAN'T RETURN TO THE MOON because we No Longer Have the Exact Data "and it's a Painful Process to build it back"? I have a Feeling you don't Want to believe Anything you haven't Already Been Fed.
@@mikecrownshaw1646 Slow motion was'nt available? Did you Actually make That Statement?
People still believe we've gone to space? Every rocket launch I've seen has usually exploded or failed. We've never gone to space unless we're talking about MySpace.
You forgot the /s at the end of the ridiculously stupid comment.
Since you're "obviously" an expert on video and motion picture technology that was available in 1969 please tell us all how the moon landings were faked.
How was 143 minutes of continuous video depicting Armstrong and Aldrin shuffling around on the moon faked and how 1/6th lunar gravity was simulated? While slow motion video was available in 1969, the video was taken with a hand-held camera. Using film shot at high speed to simulate 1/6th gravity was possible, but a 14-inch diameter 16mm film magazine containing 1,600 ft of film lasts about 48 minutes. The video is continuous. Even if multiple cameras had been used differences in emulsion would have been detected. Additionally, later missions were in color with a higher video frame rate.
At the time of the broadcast, magnetic disk recorders capable of storing slow motion footage could only capture 30 seconds in total, for a playback of 90 seconds of slow-motion video. To capture 143 minutes in slow motion, you’d need to record and store 47 minutes of live action, which simply wasn’t possible.
How did astronaut David Scott manage to get a hammer and a falcon feather to drop at the same rate corresponding to the "faked" 1/6th lunar gravity during the "fake" Apollo 15 mission?
The technology to fake the moon landing DID NOT EXIST in 1969! It was actually "easier" to build a rocket and GO THERE!
Lmao not myspace 💀😭🤣
How come they never landed on the moon again
they lost the technology
As this video is about Apollo 11, the answer to that question is "they did".
This is a very low quality studio production. Where is the video showing the inside of the LEM during descent and ascent.
@@suekennedy8917 Why do you ask?
Sam Man
You're joking, right?
I feel sorry for people who were fooled into believing this 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
THIS NOT THE ORIGINAL FOOTAGE... IN THE ORIGINAL FOOTAGE, THE ASTRONAUTS COMING DOWN THE LADDER, ARE SEE THRU!
The quality of the video specially being black-and-white looks like it could be staged
Because there's no real fine details behind it
They should make a newer updated video in 4,k now
So people can actually see something
They also took 16 mm film.
ruclips.net/video/WJTgc7w8wf0/видео.html
It's a low powered TV signal coming from the MOON in 1969 ffs!
Use your brain for once in your life why don't you?
Each time they returned they had better video equipment. Look at the images of Apollo 12, 14, 15, 16 and 17 for much, much better video - hours of it
Better signal than me
Woah woah.. why is he see through towards the end???????
How did they have a camera there
They brought it with them.
I made a video about it.
ruclips.net/video/fBB3jyBxtYg/видео.html
who controls this camera? the video has obvious cuts in it so who is starting and stopping the camera?
Remote signal from Earth, control from in the lander or exit vehicle or edited on Earth after recieving the raw footage. Remote control and computers did exist back then, and it does not require much processing power to switch cameras.
@@RamdomView You didn't answer the question .
@@Mike_Greene he literally answered your question directly
@@felipecampos1403
you're late. Is his response the same as yours?
sigh.... . (ask my question to yourself then repeat what he wrote
or
explain how the guy " literally answered your (my) question directly"
All he did was list the ways he THINK(THOUGHT) the camera COULD receive a signal. Fyi i did say i wasn't coming back to this foolery....
@@Mike_Greene yes they did answer the question. Mission control controlled the camera