Sqrt(3^x^2)) = 3^(sqrtx)

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 11 июл 2024
  • This exponential equation has two main ideas. The first is to understand the difference between an exponent and a tetration. The second is to understand the domain of the Square-root function.

Комментарии • 52

  • @Windows__2000
    @Windows__2000 22 дня назад +42

    "X isn't real it can't hurt you"

    • @inyobill
      @inyobill 22 дня назад +1

      The integers no more real than the Imaginary numbers.

    • @Windows__2000
      @Windows__2000 22 дня назад

      @@inyobill Integers literally are "real numbers" while imaginary ones are not:
      en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Real_number

  • @Etothe2iPi
    @Etothe2iPi 22 дня назад +2

    A better explanation would be: Exponentiation is not associative, but there is a convention that 3^x^2=3^(x^2). When it comes to the equation
    x^3=a, it's much easier to draw the equilateral triangle in the complex plane and read off the three solutions.

  • @lesliesusil4711
    @lesliesusil4711 22 дня назад +7

    Squaring both sides is much easier I think.
    3^[x^2]={3^[x^1/2]}^2
    3^[x^2]={3^x^1/2}
    As base is 3 for Both sides
    X^2 =2(x)^1/2
    X^4=4x
    X(x^3 -4)=0
    X=0,x=4^1/3,

    • @gamingplus8625
      @gamingplus8625 22 дня назад +1

      No complex solutions?

    • @craftinators7107
      @craftinators7107 22 дня назад

      @@gamingplus8625 You can the 2 complex solutions from the polynomial x^3 - 4 =0

    • @gamingplus8625
      @gamingplus8625 21 день назад

      @@craftinators7107 yes,but it was not in the video
      no big deal
      😀

  • @johnstanley5692
    @johnstanley5692 22 дня назад +2

    you have obtained x^2=2*sqrt(x); let a=sqrt(x) and divide both sides by 'a' => a^3 = 2. so a= 2^(1/3)*exp(i*2*n*pi/3), n=0,1,2.
    Hence x = a^2 = 2^(2/3)*exp(i*4*n*pi/3).

  • @ruud9767
    @ruud9767 22 дня назад +4

    The complex solutions are
    4^(1/3) * (i*sqrt(3)-1)/2
    and 4^(1/3) * (-i*sqrt(3)-1)/2
    The square roots of these are again complex.

    • @dirklutz2818
      @dirklutz2818 21 день назад

      er moet nog 2 maal een minnetje voor!

  • @deriklytten
    @deriklytten 22 дня назад +1

    When we get the equation (1/2)*(x^2) = √x itself we know that we actually have only 2 solutions, and squaring it will give 2 extra values that aren't solutions.
    So why go the extra step in factorising x^3 - 4 = 0?
    We know it should give only one proper solution.

  • @NOTHING-yu3ry
    @NOTHING-yu3ry 22 дня назад +7

    You are super sir ❤❤❤
    You are great sir ❤❤❤❤
    Love from India 🇮🇳

  • @zpf6288
    @zpf6288 22 дня назад +4

    And why discarding the two complex solutions? They are still solutions, and we didn't ask for real solutions only. What do I miss?

    • @kyintegralson9656
      @kyintegralson9656 14 дней назад +1

      You were asked for real positive solutions implicitly, by putting x under the radical sign.

  • @snowman2395
    @snowman2395 22 дня назад +4

    title is Sqrt(3^x^2)) = x^(sqrtx) but thumbnail and video show Sqrt(3^x^2)) = 3^(sqrtx)

  • @cret859
    @cret859 22 дня назад +5

    5:29 As we know that we are looking for a positive real x , why may we not directly deduce from x³ - 4 = 0 that x = ∛4 ?

    • @Th3OneWhoWaits
      @Th3OneWhoWaits 22 дня назад +1

      We need three solutions, so we must factor as a difference of 2 cubes. Cube root of 4 is only one answer, we can't get rid of the other two inadmissable roots by doing what you said.

    • @boringextrovert6719
      @boringextrovert6719 22 дня назад +5

      @@Th3OneWhoWaitsyou still don’t have to though. This form of difference of two cubes always produces a linear factor and a non-reducible quadratic.
      Also, the cube root is one to one in real numbers. So no need for all this

    • @Th3OneWhoWaits
      @Th3OneWhoWaits 22 дня назад +1

      @@boringextrovert6719 Makes sense, I was just wanting show that even though there are three solutions to the factoring, not all of them satisfy the problem.

    • @cret859
      @cret859 22 дня назад +1

      @@Th3OneWhoWaits Thanks you for your help. I now see where/why I was confused.
      In fact, polynomials of the third degree only have exactly 3 roots when defined on the complex numbers's domain. For polynomials of the 3rd degree defined on reals, they may be only a maximum of three real roots. But the trick here is to verify that 0 and ∛4 are the only possible roots (real or complex).
      In fact P(z) = z³-4 has three roots (one real root and two conjugated complex roots) { ∛4 ; ∛4×(-1+i.√3)/2 ; ∛4×(-1-i.√3)/2 }.
      So that z×P(z) = z⁴-4z has four solutions { 0 ; ∛4 ; ∛4×(-1+i.√3)/2 ; ∛4×(-1-i.√3)/2 }
      Fortunately, ∛4×(-1+i.√3)/2 and ∛4×(-1-i.√3)/2 are not solutions of the initial equation √(3^(x²)) = 3^(√x). So the only solutions are the two real 0 and ∛4.
      But, if you deliberately limit yourself at the real solutions, as Primes Newton say it at 08:08 , you can spare the determination of the two extra complex roots.

    • @Th3OneWhoWaits
      @Th3OneWhoWaits 22 дня назад

      @@cret859 Glad I could help!

  • @TerryFerrellmathematics
    @TerryFerrellmathematics 22 дня назад

    Thank you!

  • @FinalMiro
    @FinalMiro 22 дня назад +2

    hey I atleast found one being 4^1/3, yet I didn't know how to prove anything 🤣

  • @leonardolivieri3573
    @leonardolivieri3573 22 дня назад +1

    Complex solutions:
    (-1 (+-) i* sqrt(3)) / ( 2^ (1/3))
    🇮🇹🇮🇹🇮🇹

  • @sepehrhaghverdi8977
    @sepehrhaghverdi8977 22 дня назад +1

    6:30 you can put 4 in the right hand so your life don't get harder

  • @inyobill
    @inyobill 22 дня назад

    Ahhhh, never realized that exponentiation isn't associative(?). Makes sense, 27**3 would be several orders of magnitude smaller than 3**27

  • @mjpottertx
    @mjpottertx 21 день назад

    Gotta love still using a blackboard!

  • @the3stumbleteers870
    @the3stumbleteers870 День назад

    yo can u do jee advanced questions

  • @sheikhfarooq123
    @sheikhfarooq123 22 дня назад

    A good try, wish u all sucess.By the way ,if u substitute cube root of 4 in the exp. Equation ,how does it behave.since it is a root of the equation.

  • @the_warpig1919
    @the_warpig1919 22 дня назад

    Does this require the use of the Product log function?

  • @RubyPiec
    @RubyPiec 22 дня назад +1

    Just wanted to comment to say the title is wrong, should be 3^sqrtx, no?

  • @ChengxiHu-e1u
    @ChengxiHu-e1u 22 дня назад

    But a cuadratic equation tends to have a positive answer, right?

  • @user-lu9fg7pc9q
    @user-lu9fg7pc9q 17 дней назад

    9:12 we can

  • @TheMathManProfundities
    @TheMathManProfundities 22 дня назад +2

    Wow, did you really just say that you can't put anything other than a positive under a radical sign? Of course you can. Have you never heard of √(-1) = i or √0 = 0? In fact any number, including all complex numbers can be placed under a radical. √{re^(iθ)} = √(r)e^(iθ/2) {r>0, θ∈(-π, π]}.

    • @baconboyxy
      @baconboyxy 22 дня назад

      Obviously he has, the video presumably was only considering real solutions. No need to be so pretentious about it.

    • @TheMathManProfundities
      @TheMathManProfundities 21 день назад +1

      @@baconboyxy Unfortunately not, he specifically refers to the complex solutions and eliminated them because they 'can't go under the radical'. He could easily have said that he was only looking for real solutions. It seems he actually believes this and that definitely needs pointing out as it could be very dangerous for people trying to learn from his videos.

  • @dante9632
    @dante9632 22 дня назад

    Can somebody explain why other 2 complex solutions are not considered solution? I thought complex world is all about putting negative under square root.

    • @PrimeNewtons
      @PrimeNewtons  22 дня назад

      The radical sign and negative or complex numbers do not coexist.

    • @stephensimpson7794
      @stephensimpson7794 22 дня назад

      @@PrimeNewtons sqrt(-1) = i
      sure looks like they coexist just fine in that equation.
      but maybe you just didn't explain your actual thought.

  • @user-wl4zu2ok1e
    @user-wl4zu2ok1e 22 дня назад +3

    Sorry to point it out, but the correct title of the video should be: Sqrt(3^x^2) = 3^(sqrtx)

  • @boringextrovert6719
    @boringextrovert6719 22 дня назад +6

    There is no need for the extra work to solve the cubic. You can immediately say that the cube root of 4 is the only solution

  • @Ankilo-boy
    @Ankilo-boy 22 дня назад +1

    Couldn’t it be 1?

    • @joaomane4831
      @joaomane4831 22 дня назад +2

      Think about it. Is the sqrt(3) equal to 3?

    • @Ankilo-boy
      @Ankilo-boy 22 дня назад +1

      @@joaomane4831 i mean 3^x^2 under sqrt is 3^x?

    • @novidsonmychanneljustcomme5753
      @novidsonmychanneljustcomme5753 22 дня назад

      ​@@Ankilo-boy No. What you mean would be 3^(sqrt(x^2)) which is NOT equivalent to sqrt(3^(x^2)).

    • @thunderpokemon2456
      @thunderpokemon2456 22 дня назад

      No 3^1/2 is not equal to 3 but x could be 4^1/3

  • @SidneiMV
    @SidneiMV 22 дня назад

    x²/2 = √x
    x² = 2√x
    x⁴ = 4x
    x(x³ - 4) = 0
    *x = 0*
    *x = ∛4*

    • @PrimeNewtons
      @PrimeNewtons  22 дня назад +1

      You forgot to square the 2 in the 3rd line

    • @SidneiMV
      @SidneiMV 22 дня назад

      @@PrimeNewtons thanks! fixed

  • @krefars
    @krefars 22 дня назад

    3^(0.5x^2) = 3^(x^(0.5))
    x^2 = 2x^0.5
    x^0.5 (x^1.5 - 2) = 0
    x = 0, x = 2^(2/3)