THIS is How You Know Ancient Egyptians had a Lost Ancient Technology…
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 1 ноя 2021
- Remember when they said Ancient Egyptian stones were so precise, that a Razorblade, or even a hair couldn't fit between them? Well, THIS is what they meant by that. Did the the Egyptians have a lost ancient technology?
Thanks for watching! I'm Jimmy Corsetti, and my channel is called Bright Insight.
Help support me in my efforts by supporting me on Venmo! @bright_insight
Or, by contributing to my Patreon! / brightinsight
Follow me on Instagram: / bright_insight
Follow me on TikTok: vm.tiktok.com/ZM8u3XBhL/ 
Развлечения
So the question becomes, what was the technology? - OR...was it ALIENS? :)
Follow me on Instagram: instagram.com/bright_insight/
Follow me on TikTok: vm.tiktok.com/ZM8u3XBhL/
Help Support me by contributing to my Patreon! www.patreon.com/BrightInsight
If you like my video, Tip me $ on Venmo! @bright_insight
Thank you for watching! - Jimmy
... Much Love!!!
missed you man !! glad your back on my recomended page
They made them for the glysburg cycle.
12,065 year cycles.
The Diehold Foundation. Series 4.
It explains everything.
Even the eye of the Sahara.
Think of the time lines
Jimmy? Goto the Richate structure. The eye of the Sahara was ground Zero for Ra. Read the Egyptian history again. The king who owned the temple Ra, was the god king. He moved the eye of ra to the fertile Nile. Why? To protect the valley of the kings, erect the first large pyramid to house the Eye of Ra. A weapon. It destroyed the Richate in the battle for the the elder eye of Horace another weapon. But Orion’s Belt was the ultimate with younger Horace with both eyes. Until a weak leader listened to Apophis and disconnected the Orion’s Belt. And left ra alone. In steps Seth to correct the problem. Operation Hercules goes into Egypt takes the bulls with out incidence. Leaving Apophis another city to take.
Have you seen Mike Haduck's videos on stone shaping? I don't think it proves the Egyptians they claim did it, I think they were built much earlier. But he shows how stone can be worked.
I work in stonemasonry, programming & operating machines that cut all types of stone. Black Granite & quartzite being the most difficult to cut. But cutting isn’t the issue. Even with expensive diamond tipped saws or a water jet at 60,000 psi , cutting the stone is relatively achievable (obviously technically advanced in terms of tooling) with the tools we use. The issue we have is moving and placing them in position without pieces blowing out when a corner barely touches something. If we pick a piece of granite Bench-top up at either end it can easily just break in two. Although tough to cut it’s incredibly fragile, as veins running through it are far less dense, and easily crumble apart. Bits that fall to the ground are literally collected and glued back into place, as to retain as natural look. All stone edges have a bevel or little rounded edge for structural integrity on the edges. Corners and edges can chip so easily. If you had a 15 tonne block of granite with polished faces and square edges/corners I literally cannot fathom how gentle you’d have to be to manoeuvre it into position without bits just breaking off when bumped even slightly… for all these square corners to be perfectly intact indicates to me very advanced stonemasonry to say the least. & then consider moving them?!! People don’t realise what this weight entails when using such a hard yet fragile material
Thanks for the info
Great info, it is good to hear from someone who works with stone and knows the details of how it is and what is never told about the stone itself.
so granite doesnt have much structural inherent strength?
@@xisotopex correct, it’s unreliable. All natural stone that I cut including granite comes with a layer of fibreglass glued to the underside. This is to stop it caving in on itself where there is a gap in cabinetry and where someone may apply weight. For example if I had a 20/30mm thick 2.5m long x 0.4m wide benchtop and had 2 guys pick it up flat from each end it’d almost certainly break somewhere, if it was 0.6m wide it might hold together, probably not though. Marble is the same, but softer, limestones one of the worst/most difficult to keep intact. We lift everything we can with vacuum lifts, & if we can’t, we carry on edge never flat. If I could grab a hammer and just lay into the face of a piece I could smash into small bits easily, it’d just break on the veins. Cutting and shaping without fault is very hard but breaking it is generally very easy.
@@Jack9N Thanks for sharing your experience!
I've worked in construction even diamond drilling and sawing for 15 years and even with today's technology it's extremely difficult to obtain that level of precision and they seem to be able to do it with ease on a massive scale it's unbelievable to me.
Thanks for all the likes and comments first of all. My observation of disbelief has come from my experience of working in concrete cutting, working with big blocks of reinforced concrete with 40mm steel rebar. No where has any historian or scientist explained how they could cut rose granite with such precision thousands of years ago the most amazing examples of this to me are the stone boxes of the Serapeum of Saqqara let alone how they got the boxes into place. Also to the comments suggesting these blocks where cast or poured that technology does not exist in terms of creating granite or rose granite or any impermeable rock due to the pressures required only found in geological nature.
Sorry if I didn't reply to any comments, having read though the discussion from my initial comment I am humbled to have opened such a debate. Peace 👌
Interesting
We have no idea how long the Pyramids and Sphinx have been there. And we have no idea what the region looked like when they were built. It was probably a beautiful grassland with buildings and all kinds of advanced technology we haven't discovered yet.
Have you been hit with those theories yet, that they used the sun and a lense like a magnifying glass to melt the stone into shape? After working with granite for 20 years, I heard it all, but its all bs. This is clear work of power tools on a scale we can't fathom, because our technology is based on a "pully" system.
How do you feel about the theory that most ancient megalithic sites like this were built with poured/moulded stones made out of geopolymer, created using plant matter that can naturally soften even the hardest stone? I’m not personally convinced one way or another, but I (and I’m sure many others) would appreciate your input.
@@olo_smooth_olo5606 it was already proven to be lush forest. The water errosion on the spynx base estimates it at least 12,000 years ago cause thats the last time there was that much water there
I spent my childhood getting answers to my questions in school and the rest of my life, questioning those answers
heres an interesting thought:
assuming that each stone in the pyramid was 1 meter (the avg height) and assuming that they were all in form of a cube (for simplicity sake), how long it would take to cut 2.5 million limestones at 4mm/hour rate:
Each stone is 1 meter in length.
You want to cut a 1 meter cube from each stone.
The cube will have dimensions of 1 meter x 1 meter x 1 meter.
First, let's calculate the volume of a single stone that needs to be cut into a 1 meter cube:
Volume of stone = 1 meter x 1 meter x 1 meter = 1 cubic meter
Now, you want to cut 2.5 million stones into 1 cubic meter cubes:
Total volume of stone to be cut = 2.5 million stones * 1 cubic meter per stone = 2.5 million cubic meters
Given that it takes 1 hour to cut through 4 millimeters of stone, we need to convert the volume of stone to the equivalent thickness in millimeters:
1 cubic meter = 1,000,000 cubic millimeters (since 1 meter = 1000 millimeters)
Total volume in millimeters = 2.5 million cubic meters * 1,000,000 cubic millimeters per cubic meter = 2.5 * 10^12 cubic millimeters
Now, we need to find out how many 4-millimeter layers can be cut from this total volume:
Number of layers = Total volume in millimeters / Thickness of each layer in millimeters
Number of layers = 2.5 * 10^12 / 4 = 625 * 10^9 layers
Since each layer takes 1 hour to cut, the total time required in hours:
Total time = Number of layers * Time per layer
Total time = 625 * 10^9 hours
So, it would take approximately 625 billion hours to cut 2.5 million stones into 1 cubic meter cubes using the given cutting rate.
625 billion hours / 24 hours/day = approximately 26.04 billion days
So, 625 billion hours is approximately equivalent to 26.04 billion days.
I guess something's wrong.
I forgot to say that thats about 71.29 million years.
But that’s cutting one stone at a time. I’m sure they were doing hundreds at a time.
@@123100ozzyyeap, and with no rest, no sleeping all a long line of slaves waiting for their shift to cut. Ridiculous.
@@Nick9Three I didn't calculate the multiplicity of possible quarries cus it's basically vestigial in the final result. Even at thousands of stones being quarried and moved in one single day (which is impossible by any standards) it would take around thousands of years.
@Nick9Three , so, to get 20 years, you will need 3.56 million cuts a year.
Can you imagine what this place was like back then? My mind just goes crazy thinking about it. I’ll bet it was BEAUTIFUL!
I can only imagine with all the original color on the structures, definitely would be a sight for sore eyes!!
Lots of green trees & grass . No desert sands.
Blazing white pyramids. green pastures, lost tech.
@@capricosm8086 - Yes, especially since these pyramids were built more than 7000 years ago when Egypt was still green. They were actually built at least 10,000 years ago. The Sphinx is even older.
Yes, the casing stones had an almost mirror-like sheen. In addition, they had symbols on them that were not Egyptian hieroglyphics. That's part of the reason they are no longer there. A much older human civilization is responsible for most of the megalithic structures found around the world. Especially in Africa and South America. We truly are a species with amnesia.
i love how they "approximately" know it took 20 years to build a pyramid but they dont approximately know how ANYTHING actually got done.
I've been carving stone in restoration for 30 years. A lot of granite too. The method of sawing with sand and water has been used for thousands of years and can be speeded up a lot with skilled workers. But achieving accuracy is absolutely impossible with this method. Runouts of 5 to 20 cms (!) per meter cutting downwards are quite commonly found in old blocks that were not cut with primitive machines such as water wheels but by hand
Cast stone.
See the lectures of Joseph Davidovits on geopolymers
You can see the chip marks in the limestone, that has the chip marks from tools 6:13 into the video. They used bronze, and the bronze work hardens to that of a medium carbon steel, so I can believe them working sandstone and lime stone but eventually bronze will start to breakdown and fall apart after it work hardens to much, so they must of gone through a lot of bronze picks and or chisels, however I find it very doubtful they used bronze to work pink granite since granite is a lot harder which is and 8 on the mohs scale of hardness, 10 being as hard as diamond and 1 being as hard as talc, so granite is an 8, and high carbon steel is an 8, but work hardened bronze is 6 to 6.5. so the bronze would not cut into the granite to chip it away. This means they used something else. What, no one knows ?
I had heard of this, but until I saw your photos, I didn't realize just how precise it actually is. Amazing.
I believe it was aliens who built these unexplainable monuments.
There are too many patterns of the same methods used.. also look at the handbag, the pinecone of the Gods throughout the world.
To the untrained eye it's easy to miss or write it off as a unimportant detail until the implication of its meaning sets in, then all hell breaks loose with the opposition and outcomes the ridiculous...
@@vipr1142 how ridiculous lol...
@@steve-o6413 Why is it ridiculous?
I think you are ridiculous to think this idea is ridiculous.
There are many unexplained things that we have no clue at all how it was made.
I believe aliens built alot of the unexplainable monuments, like the baalbek, pyramids etc.
To make humans become civilized, to make people build the first civilizations around these places.
Im asking you again, why is it ridiculous?
That its was an ancient civilization that covered the whole earth is as plausible as aliens in my eyes.
But I guess, you are just unaware.
Man got burned alive for introducing science back in the days, guess its better to be ridiculed 😂
Most blocks aren’t even rectangles they are varied in size and shape to fit together like a jig saw to withstand even the strongest earthquake
A huge part of the base of the Great Pyramid is connected to the bedrock. The technology they must have used surpasses ours easily
@@olo_smooth_olo5606 nonsense, we make stones flatter than those by the millions. every machine shop has them.
@@victorhopper6774 ya and they last like 100 years tops and need constant maintenance. Also the size is not even in the same park
@@r3fus32d13 Tbf, main reason of todays building lack of logetivity, is due to steel bars that are used for reinforcement.
@@olo_smooth_olo5606 this is kind of a unfair matchup since our infrastructure are geared differently...
Have there been any trace metal elements found along the seams of the blocks? It would appear that any metal tool would leave behind metal residue. Possibly even at a microscopic scale.
They used laser probably aliens helped to build and cut the stones.
It's not actually a mystery, just trying to get views. There are many, many ancient ways to cut stone. The pyramid builders probably used a sort of rope saw.
@@NonEuclideanTacoCannon wrong the rope saw theory was debunked by experiments with granite that it was impossible because they made nearly no progress at all. They used advandced technology christopher dunns tests with boreholes and cutted stones in egypt showed they used definetly some very advandced technology.
I've seen a few videos that show the tiny grooves in hard rock bore holes found in Egypt are not striations but continuous, like the grooves on a phonograph record. This practically shouts the tool used cutting these holes was cutting into the stone at such a rate it did not repeat itself but continuously kept cutting "down". This takes strong pressure, and a hard, durable cutting head to do, something we can barely do even today with all our modern equipment...there is a great lapse in our understanding the technology ancient Egyptians used here. However, the even greater mystery, to me anyway, is not the boring machine itself, but the necessary technology needed to build such machines. Not only are all these machines missing, but the machines used to build these machines is absent as well, as is the supportive operating manuals, be they papyrus scrolls, clay tablets, or even inscriptions on temple walls. All this technology, along with the widespread industry and its associated tools needed for it have vanished...like someone said "Pack all this up and take it away so that it can never ever be found." That, or, perhaps, the time period when all this technology was being used was somewhat earlier than what we consider as classic "Egyptian"; pre-dynastic or, "Zep Tepi. That is an epoch prior to when the first Egyptians started keeping records, like the Abydos King.
In geology, there is single layer of rock one can see, can touch separateing rock typically less than 500 million years old from rock well over a billion or more years old. This is called The Great Unconformity; where the geology exists it can be found on continents the world over. It represents many millions of years of rocks long lost to erosion, vanished into grains of sand water washed or wind-blown away. It is not impossible for my mind to likewise consider something much the same exists here when it comes to the activities of humans in Egypt...and many other places the world over: there are gaps in our history so great that all evidence has been lost to history, we are only left with a few of examples, shards, of all that went on way-back-then. Perhaps we are not yet looking in the right places; the oceans, coastlines were much lower thousands of years ago. Developing the technology to build the tools to comprehensively explore coastlines now 300 to 400 feet below the ocean might be something established academia does not want to explore? There are many places we might look but have yet to do so: where did the Nile flow, say, 12,000 to 50,000 years (or ever further) ago...methodically explore the river bottom there for artifacts, or, the now drowned river delta of the ancient Nile, or, those drowned river delta's from rivers no longer extant that once flowed into the Mediterranean further West from the Nile in what is now Libya. What we don't look for we will never find. List@@cheesyspace
@@frankwolf3860problem is this. If you do have machines to cut blocks. Why on earth would you end up with millions of completely rough hand cut blocks in the places that are unseen?. Why would anyone spend millions of hours to roughly hand cut stuff while you have machines for the job? You should see all of the blocks at least with somewhat level or flat sides not just some that you want to look good?. It makes no sense?
Beyond the massive amount of pyramids, temples and monuments, think about all the underground complexes. Cut 30 to 70 meters into bedrock or limestone bases. Just mind blowing. I’ve been to Egypt and want to go back in light of the information in your videos.
i would say think about the age of their civilization which was over 3000 years in the making thats a whole lot more than any recent continues civilization if we where to exclude the chinese that is.
recently like the last 200 years we went from horse and buggy to flying to the moon on space ships and over another 200years nobody would even still know how to build a proper buggy wheel hell even current day it would be hard to find a person who can still make you a wooden buggy wheel but they are out there but are a dieing breed as are many other professions which would lead to the loss of that knowledge .
just look at the history of the romans and how they managed to build all those aqua-ducts and the colosseum it took ages to get back to that level of masonry does that mean that they had different or more advanced tech than us ? i think not they just got more provisioned with the tools and resources that they had at that time
The ancients didn’t want to just build something, they wanted to drop the biggest flex on the pinnacle of mankind’s intelligence. The flex is so bad that it’s completely ignored
lol i didnt' understand the word you said, but i get it
@@watchtube1412 the universe said it, I just type it out
A flex so hard, that some ppl nowadays believe that the ancients got help from eliens. xD
Yes this structure represents something most impossible. You would be interested in the Moon, Earth ratio conveyed in the measurement of the Great Pyramid (and Stonehenge) and also the fact it is a perfect scale model of the Northern Hemisphere of the Earth.
There are hundreds of impossible anomalies. Pi, Phi, and the Golden section is closed in it's basic measurements, and every 2 seconds, the Earth turns the exact distance of one of the sides of the Great Pyramid. The engineers obviously knew of Geodesy and the exact size and shape of the Earth. Let's not even get into the transport of hundred ton stones hundreds of miles when these people supposedly were naked butt cloth wearing simpletons.
So you have a structure that marks the Equinoxes with it's 8 sides, numerous important mathematical concepts, the size AND shape of Earth and the moon, its coordinates are literally the speed of light, it points to Orion, and this is barely scratching the surface because it was likely generating energy
@@olo_smooth_olo5606 I think the nephilum built it(man/angel hybrids) …Sumerian tablets hint on outside influence.. I don’t know why the Bible doesn’t bring up this stuff…
Like they knew the rock would last for a long time, and wanted us to look into it, as if it’s a clue in an escape room. (Earth)
Inside the Bent Pyramid. Just 0.5 degree out, would show up instantly. They are not just individually cut perfectly. They are cut perfectly to fit and align with the blocks directly next to them. Now that's amazing.
Yes, cutting is one thing but the ability to measure, record and then coordinate the fitting of one block to another requires 3D modeling.
@@M13x13M that's why I find it interesting this isn't mentioned too much with JPHs theory of how it was constructed (which I think his theory is basically the only theory worth considering, it is logical, well thought out and incorporates little details that remain on the pyramid). But no mention of how he used a computer to 3D model this, but the builders would not of had that luxury.
It just blows the timeframe out substantially you would think, as there would have been so many times you would have to reshape stones to fit like that.
that's called formwork, yes formwork
Jesus
@@SOLIDSNAKE. I doubt it.
I just finished talking to my brother and he and I are a lot alike. He just sent me a link to Bright insight and I very much enjoy the content. Keep up the great work. AWESOME!!!
We can go into space, smash atoms, create miraculous art , but we can't do this basic cut ,fit, and lift stonework. The ancients would probably laugh at us
A good friend of mine is a stonemason. He went to Egypt and told me even with modern tools it's hard to piece together stones as perfectly.
Yes, that’s because he’s not a alien.
@@garinoakley Could've been aliens or could've been a technologically advanced civilization that got wiped out in the cataclysm. I personally tend to go with the latter (because Occam's razor) but I wouldn't rule out the former.
@@EBDavis111 You argument totally convinced me, thank you for opening my eyes with razor-sharp wit and mountain of evidence.
@@EBDavis111 Indeed.
Jimmy: As an Egyptian, I thank you so much for trying to find out and tell us what the REAL story of those things we have all around us in Egypt, which to this day, we do not fully understand, and we foolishly repeat the hype they tell us when we were children. Hope to see you again in Egypt in YOUR country.
History is written by the winners or those in charge. That goes for any civilization or government.
I like how you say "YOUR country". I'm an American, and while I've always found archeology (particularly in Egypt) fascinating and super fun to learn about, I've never been on the level of Egyptology as people like Jimmy. Since the times of old, there have been people from all around the world that have felt such a calling from Egypt that they become obsessed with going, seeing, exploring, learning. I haven't seen that level of obsession with anything besides dinosaurs. There's so much we don't know, and if we ever hope to, we need these people to keep asking questions. And in my mind, I agree with you completely: they are Egyptian just as you are. It is where they belong, want to be, and where we need them. Much love 🙌❤
@@Cello69. Like the library of Alexandria, they'd tell us the library was burned with all it's content, but i guarantee the valuable things are in their possession, everything else was burned by the elites of that era.
@@yobro6053 - you’re probably right.
I'm really curious, what general opinions of this topic for everyday egyptian folks? Aware of all this mystery? thanks
You think that maybe over thousands of years of weathering and settling, the space between the blocks will disappear completely?
I'm still not fully convinced that aliens weren't involved.
Aliens definitely
Maybe those aliens are us or we are them. Maybe why they are observing us, to see how much we have evolved. Religions sure don't have the answers.
Keep in mind that the later dynasties could have uses hieroglyphs or painting as graffiti to basically write a new or false past onto older stones to take the credit for what was lost before the cataclysm. The most megalithic and impressive stones have no artwork on them.
Right like our fiction books. In the future someone can read that and think it was real life.
Just like you can write a false past on the stone to make it appear ancient and pre-cataclysmic.
There is no telling how much information we lost. In part because, as you say, later dynasties were eager to take credit for something they didn't build, but also at the hands of the Egyptian government, keeping some of these sites under tight locks for decades. We will never know if they removed artefacts or not.
@@victorespino5650 I think that we are suffering from the opposite of that, actually. I think we are reading ancient science books and think they are works of fiction.
@@victorespino5650 The Book of Dave, from Will Self is a excellent story about this.
The mystery is bigger than that expressed here. Add to it that this precision, the shape of stones and many other aspects are duplicated around the world in structures that are of the same era, yet there is no record anywhere that the civilizations involved had any interaction with each other. In Peru, there are examples of where the Inca made additions to these structures where the newer masonry suggests the original technology simply vanished and they werent even able to come close to reproducing the presicion or any aspect of the design. The newer additions are representative of what we would expect to see using hand tools, completely contrasting the original structure. It is obvious to me that who ever had created the technology simply ceased to exist along with the knowledge.
There's not even any record that any of those civilizations built said structures and in many cases didn't even know they existed.
Same thing with the Maya. The older stuff is more precise, and the newer stuff is rough. Mayan city-states seemed to have a cycle of peaks and falls. War, famine, and natural catastrophes would chip away at their cumulative knowledge, until you see late Mayan sites are poor imitations of their golden age. What's scary is we know next to nothing about the civilizations that predate the Mayans who probably suffered the same cycle of peak and decline until they too just disappear or are absorbed by a civilization on the rise.
The mummies from all over the world have the same DNA. The same people made them. Out of cement.
The ancients found a better world, packed up their space ships and left. 👽
Maybe the older structures have been petrified by the YD cataclysm? A global cataclysm remember. Maybe these materials were once wooden, concrete, metal? And were covered with ash and sediment causing them to undergo rapid petrification and were turned the into stone. That's what limestone is.. petrified rock. These "Impossible drill holes" the crazy angles, the scoop marks in the ground, the really tight fitting of blocks, and tube drills!!?? they must have been a softer material and what we're actually looking at is an imprint of what WAS there.
What we need for rapid petrification is acid, heat, silica , sediment, and then rapid cooling ..all of which we would be carried in the clouds of a a ocean impact/volcano
This problem is so easily solved. Those who write about and propose they know exactly how these stone blocks or especially the granite sarcophagus were chiseled out, should be required to do one themself, to completion, no matter how long it takes - and they cannot give up until it's complete.
Watch how fast they shut up.
I worked with a Hungarian stonemason who was in his late 50’s. He said in Lebanon many years ago, stone masons would spend their entire working lives on one single column. So for what it’s worth, the conclusion I derived from speaking with him was: The ancients weren’t concerned about time like we are today. Imagine that people dedicated their lives to just one piece of this giant construction and the accuracy was more important than how long it took to make it. However that concept still doesn’t answer many questions regarding lifting and setting these massive blocks, but it may solve at least the problem of timeline if we think of it in lifetimes as opposed to decades.
But how would you answer the question that that these pyramids were not built over a lifetime but over a span of say 20-30 years.
@@diehardparamveer If we’re going to challenge the strongly held beliefs of the Egyptian authorities, the timeline for construction is one of those beliefs. Anyone who claims to have all the answers, doesn’t. Starting with Christopher Dunn’s books and what he has theorized, I think is the most critical step. Measuring, analyzing and gathering the data with our eyes.
@@diehardparamveer For a start most of the pyramid is made of limestone, not granite. Second they just used a lot of man power.
Your Hungarian stonemason friend is guessing, he has no idea what they were doing thousands of years ago mate. Its guesswork.
@@diehardparamveer A team from the National Research Center who are doctors used x-rays and found that the age of death for those workmen were from 30 to 35. Pretty much of a lifetime for those workers.
I’ve never seen the precision shown in such up close detail before, so I’ve never quite understood how incredible it is. Very wild. Thanks Jimmy!
Thermal expansion and settling over time is bound to have made these gaps tighter than they were during construction, I'm not convinced this is anything especially impressive.
@@DesmondCreighton I am curious about that as well. If they would essentially be “lapping” each other to a tight fit, slowly over time. Especially if sand or something was in between them when they were set.
@@DesmondCreighton Even if the thermal expansion of these 30+ ton blocks of granite contributed to the precision we see in the stone today I think you're still underplaying the work done here. In order for these structures to keep their integrity through high temperatures, environmental effects, and the lack of upkeep these had to be made extremely well. Furthermore, as depicted in the video, no bronze tools are capable of making timely and close-precision lines in these massive stones, much less the transportation of said blocks that very likely are heavier before being made to "specification" to fit to the other blocks. Noticeable gaps and ill-made cuts don't just disappear with time, especially with erosion.
there’s many stories of ancient people using some unknown method to turn stones plyable. those truly look fused together, as if they were soft when layed down. god how i wish i knew the truth of our past.
I was thinking the same thing. There are pictures of stone benches that have sagged into near semi-circles over the years implying that stone is really an exceptionally viscous fluid. Maybe the stones "sagged" into each other because of the tremendous weight. I mean, it's 4500 years of sagging.
You could always invent time travel then go back to find out the secrets they were using. If that was ever possible that would be one of my stops.
That doesn’t make sense to me, if the granite was made pliable it wouldn’t be possible to make curved or bevelled edges, also each and every mould would have to be unique in the case of polygonal stone as they are all different shapes, and it still doesn’t explain how they transported the granite in the first place.
Yes it's a form of concrete.
At the end of one of the Avengers movies a scene depicts a large number of people using the power of "OM" mantra in front of a pyramid.
One theory is that the ancient Egyptians used sound to move the heavy blocks.
Anyone who has gone to a bass-out car show has witnessed how powerful low frequency can temporarily deform solids (metal, glass).
The ancient Egyptians would no doubt find it very funny that we found some of their old furniture saws and thought those were used for cutting massive stone blocks.
😂😂😂
Lol right? Or their toilet paper rolls we call “copper chisels they formed the pyramids with” 😂😂
I agree
Quality stuff. Thanks for putting this together
The fact that these cuts are so common throughout these areas makes me think it was just simply easy for them to do. No human would waste that much time doing something so tedious. These cuts and moving of stone had to be as easy as building skyscrapers today.
Good point
Yeah. The complexity was intentional as to show off & say "look what I can do".
It's hard to say. Just because we don't have evidence of one thing, means we should jump to the conclusion of a theory that has just as much evidence.
im also pretty sure they made their own little mausoleums on there own or with a few friends and those cuts were just as precise
Building skyscrapers today is not easy, so they had just as advanced technology as we do today but it was different.
Another thing to keep in mind - not only are the cuts joining the stones perfectly aligned, but the faces of the stones are equally precise - making perfect planes as you go along from stone to stone i.e, like a perfectly flat floor or wall, shaped out of these enormous stones.
Ron Ryser. I don't think you can assume this with certainty, since the faces are buried, they could be concave so the edges are precise and true, but I would suspect you are correct!
That's because they are essentially poured concrete
@@JBlades88WV That sounds good, but what did they use for "forms" to contain the pour and still get it so perfect?
@@bebo5558 that's a good question, I'm sure they didn't have plywood. Maybe they used reinforced wooden boards and planks. I really don't know for sure, but it's fun to speculate. It's very mysterious, mind boggling, and quite astounding how these megalithic structures were built all over the world thousands of years ago. Clearly a lot that we don't know about our ancestors. Some kind of lost pre cataclysmic technology, whether it was domestic, extraterrestrial, or divine, I really can't say.
@@bebo5558 if man did make these maybe they had really good tools and diamonds tipped saws. Diamonds were probably a lot more plentiful years ago.
My two cents : in our shop we cut granite to make countertops as well. I could see the difference between our first one cut with a brand new quality diamond blade and a few c tops later , as the blade began to wear out . The seam on the first one was a lot better than the later. What we see here in this video is incredible. Cannot be explained. When you stand for hours polishing by hand with different pads the edges of the granite you get to know it. A chisel and a hammer ? No. Tel me you're building a ladder to the Moon , but not that they did this with a chisel and a hammer.
The granite was split along natural fractures. Then the critical fit edges were ground down flat, sometimes using the edges it would mate against.
i see you never had worked with granite to say such idiotic remark @@archstanton_live
they actually had sand paper back then - the egyptians invented it! :)
- you think they couldn't polish by hand?
do you know the sand in Egypt is very fine like flour , please think again @@shokizm1
@@archstanton_livethat does not explain all the perfect fitting of each stone block. Let alone moving them into position. Not even for a millisecond.
I wish I could go back and see this civilization in its prime.
But how far back would you go if you could? When would you have to go to in order to see it in process?
@@bradschoeck1526 At least 16,000 years, the Egyptians didnt build this they inherited it.
@@icedout2322 And they are trying to hold onto the propaganda that they built it all.
@@icedout2322 Thank you, finally someone pointing that out. Compare the quality of the cuts and buildings to the hyroglyphs the egyptians made on them. The hyroglyphs are obviously subpar, not the same artist nor quality. And the idea that the pyramid is "just a tomb" is ridiculous. You would think that there would be huge statues of the king who passed, and of his queen and family etc. everywhere too. But nope. Look at the obelisks' quality and its hyroglyphs. It doesn't match up. The Egyptians call the pyramids in their own language "triangle". Really now? I went there and had some talk with the folk, most very friendly if they don't want to sell you something lol. If you gain their trust and talk to them in a remote corner, most will admit that the "triangles" weren't build be them. Why would you destroy your own monuments by taking them apart and build Kairo with its stones?`A question no one answered me so far. It's like deconstructing the eiffel tower here and there to build a railway.
@@darkschneider8508 if you want to find out more look into Edgar Cayce he does a little dive into the civilization that created them , not much but a little, its where I got the 16k time frame. You really have to read what he says and infer a lot of his readings and not just read what comes up immediately. to delve into it you need to read over a bunch of stuff not just the obvious references. Ive got some really old books on him ive accumulated over the years and they are very insightful.
I’m a 7th generation tile setter. I work with granite,limestone,marble etc and I can say I’m 100% positive all that stone work at Giza was not done with bronze tools!
It's always satisfying when I see actual experienced professionals confirm these things. Thanks brother
@@yinzspectations yes, a tile setter is a pro at bronze tools and building pyramids
@@NoNoseProduction Someone whose profession is to set tiles made out of granite and limestone can darn well tell you how difficult it would be to do the same job, with pieces ten thousand times bigger. Duh. Doesn't take a degree in rocketry to understand that...
@@NoNoseProduction haha yeah .
I’ve pruned a bonsai before so I know it’s hard to cut down a massive tree .
@@NoNoseProduction 🧐Damn bro , this subject hit a nerve? You spent the time reading his comment and then my response and then used time outta ur life to write a sarcastic walk-off comment? Lol tou'che my freind, I like your style 😎. You remind me of a younger me.
With that outta the way. He's obviously a professional and a master at his craft. So leaving his opinion that it couldn't have been done with bronze tools is (arguably) credible insight on the topic and I let him know I appreciated it... Not.
.. you know crowning him King Champion Pyramid Builder Guy with Secret Knowledge and Stuff .... but hopefully you got the hit of dopamine from telling us mere mortals that were not worthy as you tower above us on your Golden Throne of Supreme Knowledge 😉 🙈🙉🙊
I have often wondered this too. One of my own personal thoughts is that it is done chemically. Progressing this thought, what natural creatures eat rock? First thing that springs to mind then is the crown of thorns star fish. The crown of thorn starfish secrets its stomach contents onto coral, so that it can "eat" the coral. Perhaps the Egyptians were able to form some kind of chemical from the starfish that dissolves granite?? Not so sure it would work on granite, but would not be surprised if it worked on lime stone.
Maybe they knew how to make sulfuric acid which will easily dissolve stone.
I think flint tools are the best explanation for cutting in hard material back then.
Love love this channel
The weird thing is, that the same level of precision could be found overseas in Aztec and Inca temples even though they were seemingly two perfectly separated civilizations.
Check out for example Sacsayhuaman and try to figure out how they built it.
@@adde-j6q it's easy to say "mastered" without knowing what that means. They were obviously masters at what they were doing, but the mind boggling thing is that not one archeological discovery explains how they did what they did with the tools they had.
Interesting point let's discuss.. Did aliens visit everyone or teach all the races the same thing
@@adde-j6q what's even more mysterious is the time it was built. you cannot 'carbon-date' stones. These could have been built before last ice age as well (13,000 BC)
I think that would actually imply there has been a lost world wide civilization .
That's where you are wrong. There was a global civilization, much like ours today. Some forbidden information I stumbled upon, stated that Earth had advanced civilizations 5.5 million years back in time, and we Humans are basically newborn babies. Also at our current state, we are nothing more than primitive animals compared to the ones before us:)
nice one Jimmy :) never thought my fingernail would be that famous lol
What kind of nerd convention is going on here?
your hands are the ones with yellow nail polish on right?
@@solooutlawz2685 today or tomorrow
@@UnchartedX awesome
A thumbnail of your thumbnail lol
I appreciate your opinion and how you left it open for how it was actually done. I have cut rocks and even with steel and iron metals it real hard work , I don't know the exact way they did it but people should understand that man is wonderous and we have done many things in our past and continue to do more:) p.s. if I stack soft rocks on top of each other might they flatten out and have no gaps between them I'm ok with a man spending days on a single stone , until I can prove otherwise:)
How about several generations of thousands of laborers? Did you ever tried that when cutting rocks? 🤡 ''I spent an entire afternoon trying to shape a piece of stone, and it was really hard so it seems impossible'' jesus christ people are slow.
I love this dudes channel. Great stuff 👍
Always thought these constructions were already there when ancient civilizations found them and built their societies around these mysterious monuments.
and you were probably right. but where did you get such an idea from?
@@skepticalfaith5201 Probably from the idea that there were ancient civilications that were in some ways more advanced than us that were destroyed by the younger dryas extinction event that people suspect was some kind of comet that made the sky look like it was on fire and caused a number of large floods around the globe resulting in both the technologies and cataclysm to be recorded by nearly every "post-cataclysm" civilization as creation myths and such. It has some relatively interesting connections that support it, but I have done essentially no actual research on the topic, so I am 100% not qualified to say if it's even plausible. Though I 100% would actually like it to be true, because it conveniently explains a LOT of things about the ancient world. Some would say that it's way too neat to be true though.
I'v also seen some people connect it to our supposed ancient underground civilization that also appears in lots of myths. It'd probably be easier to survive a comet in huge bunkers or something.
Yes, it’s ridiculous that they keep saying Egyptian . As an Architect it’s so obvious to me that the style is completely different therefore different cultures.
@@eclipseslayer98 The Younger Dryas could easily have been a comet steered at Earth by the Annunaki equivalents just like they say in the old texts, I mean people talk about using "small" asteroids as strategic weapons with full deniability right now.
@@Veldtian1 I have essentially zero interest in any idea regarding the Annunaki due to most people presenting exceptionally illogical ideas. Like the one about us being an engineered slave race for them. If they were so advanced, they could easily create robots that could do the job that wanted FAR easier, FAR faster, and would NEVER rebel. So and advanced species using slave labor could only mean that they would be exceptionally stupid. Though that would explain how they'd be so easy to over-throw. But then how did they advance in the first place? Did someone else help them for the shits and giggles? Eh, my sour opinion of the Annunaki aside, I have done practically zero research on "them" and what they're suppose to be, so I'm not so closed minded as my comment might suggest.
I've always found it so interesting that Edgar Cayce predicted the hall of records would be found under the paw of the sphinx. Yet when it was found that there actually is a chamber of some kind in the exact spot Cayce said,excavations and any further study were nixed immediately. What are they hiding,and more importantly,WHY?
There is an alien space craft there, and the world of Islam is not ready for that !
I've heard there is a ship under there too. Wonder why they don't just use some kind of sonar device to get an image of what's below... unless they already have and yeah the world governments won't allow it to be known because it would warp our tiny little brains. My guess is that the most powerful in all countries have been met by these same aliens for years (we have had 70 years at least of photographic evidence all over of their crafts flying around and now military evidence and accounts) and had to strike a deal not to reveal their secrets or existence until they decide, not us. Probably the deal is they get to experiment on us and our planet doesn't get invaded or blown to pieces, plus certain governments get special tech from them. Don't ask, don't tell, said every alien, I mean every government ever... I also think the ancient Egyptians were eventually either wiped out or allowed to travel far from Earth by the same aliens who gave them the technology to do these astonishing things and yes, it's a water and sound frequency they used all over the place possibly along with building portals to far off places in space. Amazing technology. Good job aliens. 👏 Let's hope full disclosure is right around the corner because WE are ready.
Alien spacecraft? Lol!
All the stone structures in Egypt are not stone at all.
They are made from poured concrete... hence the super tight tolerances and lack of tools.
Wood molds were responsible for forming the shapes.
The evidence is all there but if this idea is accepted,.... there goes the mystique.
@@jpbsv Wrong.
@@jpbsv I like the theory of lost technology for melting or pouring stone as a solution to the ancient Egyptian construction, but there are stone quarries with partial or damaged pieces still in place.
Interesting and mind boggling at the same time. The cuts are so perfect. I wish I could go back in time to see how they actually cut the stone. It seems mythical that these were ever made. I hope to hear in my lifetime how they did this.
It is no doubt that the precision of the lines where the stones meet are beyond impressive. I would like to see the two surfaces be it horizontal or vertical that are "married" to each other. Nothing was mentioned about the precision that was maintained in creating the angles that perfectly matched there adjoining neighboring stone.
Someone once postulated that if the Egyptians did use copper tools to build the pyramids, their copper smelting operation needed to maintain the tools would be larger than today's global copper industry and they would still be busy making copper chisels to this day.
Those Ancients mastered smelting in general, not just with copper. They were the 1st ones to make steel for goodness sake
The funny part is that we use copper in all our motors and call it horsepower. If we ever go under would they be confused and think we actually used horses lol...
If you cut two blocks out of a mountain and brought them to a site they would fit perfectly together, u just have to make cuts at the quarry in sequence to the installation at the building site and all would fit perfect
Nonsense. They used sand as an abrasive for the limestone.
@@breakingames7772 it's not quite so simple.
People keep giving the Egyptians credit for most of the structures scattered around Egypt, but there has been info suggesting the buildings are much older than the Egyptian culture and that they simply lived there much later taking over the ruins etc.
Yep
What makes it hard to really hit the nail on the head is the amount of misinformation and fake writings etc. There's a lot of conflicting information about what was already there when Khufu was around(discovered by them) and what was actually built by them. It has always annoyed me, but there are some interesting finds that speak of certain things but even they are to be taken with a grain of salt i.e the Inventory Stele or Stela.
@Ghost Ghost! nope. The leading egyptologists always said if they were older their would be other older structures around. I OFFER YOU GOBEKLI TEPE!!!!! The water erosion marks on the sphinx proves without a doubt it was built a long long time ago. The sphinx also faces a constellation that it would have perfectly lined up with over 10 thousand years ago.
@@bobspizza7444 Yes, Graham Hancock talks about this extensively. It really seams (haha) that our civilization goes back thousands of years more then we are taking for fact this day. The sphinx lined up with the constellation Leo. That's why it originally was a lion. The time when the sphinx was lining up with Leo, was 10000 years ago.
14:33, wow that's impressive. I can't wrap my head around how they carved that.
Very good pictures of the almost invisible joints. One thing that this megalithic technology brings on is the fact that this culture made statues in large scale depicting what we would associate with the oldest dynasty Egyptians - which can't be right. The later Egyptians must have copied the look of these statues with the cobra in the crown for their pharaohs and adapted their cultural history to that ancient look. Have we ever with certainty found a written language from those megalithic builders at all? - or was the symbolic language of the hieroglyphs developed later. There is a strange overlap in the current history between the megalithic culture and the writing in Egypt, partially caused by the primitive writing on sophisticated sculptures, but as far as I can see there's no evidence of the two being contemporaneous at any point. It looks as if the megalithic culture didn't leave anything in writing and no tools. This - either clean cut - or perhaps a short overlap - is a professional study worthy, but I don't see it done.
I definitely think they inherited these buildings or perhaps there was a short overlap between civilization and knowledge was rapidly lost.
Having worked in the trades I can say the harshest lesson to learn is: Never leave your tools on the job site.
Whomever worked these stones left long ago, and took their tools with them.
Sitchin was right!
And?
So what if they were not found there, they should have been found SOMEWHERE.
There has been hoards of copper (not pure copper) tools and stone tools found in Egypt over the centuries since archaeology began to be of greater interest, so it stands to reason that if better tools did exist once that we would have found examples of them by now.
@@mnomadvfx age is the key... it is much , much older than they say and no tools survive thousands of years... metal corrodes, only stone remains... which is why we naively call it the Stone Age because thats all that remains...
I don't think some one take the tools...I do believe when Cataclysm happen tools had to be melted in the process of destruction when blast hit the region, when I'm referring to tools I'm referring to Gold Coils or wires Circuits etc which Egyptians inherit at the arrival on the region and the remains of the gold artefacts reused in more "undeveloped fashion" probably melted to create sarchopags and other objects but the question is from where did Egyptians have so much gold? And the answer could be they find the tools and reworked them in their own perspective .
Having also worked in construction my whole life the one lesson that I have learnt is to never take your eyes off your tools on the job site😂
@@dannyboywhaa3146 As a decently well-established skeptic (but not the arrogant, in-denial type), I have to admit this is the only thing that makes sense to me as an engineer. What they've found can't do it. The tools that survived are not enough, and if they had anything better, why haven't we found it? Either on location or somewhere else? The only thing that makes sense to me is that the tools used to create it did not survive at all, and the only way THAT makes sense is if the tools used to create them were lost to time long, LONG before people think they were used.
I struggle with this notion often when I've got free time to let my mind wander, or any time I see a video like this. I had thought we'd had everything pretty well explained by now. Yes, moving heavy shit really ain't all that hard. But crafting on this level? Gives me the creepies.
I'd never seen that discarded sarcophagus before... that's incredible, it really does imply that they were cutting FAST with whatever method(s) they had available. Great video Jimmy.
It's also nice that they also knew how to screw-up, that makes me feel better...😊
It doesn't have to have been cut fast, maybe it was a large diameter cutting wheel, cutting slowly as you generally cut harder materials slower, that was used that deformed slightly and went off center. Either way it's still interesting
It helps to have 10s or 100s of 1000s of slaves working 24/7 for decades at the prime of their lives / strength and who become experts at the work within a few months because that is all they do. Yes they were cutting fast, at least faster than 2 old men who've never held a saw before, incapable or choosing not to put much muscle into it to conserve energy. I don't think the ancient Egyptians would allow such slow, unmotivated work like we see in the video clip of the two men with the saw, water, and sand (and they just learned / experimented with those techniques that 1 day, the Egyptians had centuries of experience with this, they probably knew the exact amount of sand and water and how often to add more down to a near or complete science after a few decades of doing this).
People try to make the pyramids seem larger than life and that there has to be some mystery technology or even alien involvement in their construction. I don't see why this is necessary at all. Shitloads of slave labour, eventual expertise at the craft, using young men who only do this all the time, rather than old archeologists picking up a saw for the first time in their lives and going extremely slow because they're old and out in the heat and may pull a muscle or have a heart attack going faster, lol, like that example was such a poor representation of what ancient Egyptian slave labour work probably looked like. The slaves would not have been allowed to work that slowly and unambitiously, they'd be whipped or worse and when the choice is between working to exhaustion and pulling a muscle or something, when you're a young man and just want to survive another day, yeah, you're gonna work harder than two old archeologists. Perhaps the cutters worked in teams of 4, so 2 work at cutting for 30 minutes straight, then take 30 minutes off, do that for 12 hours, then a new team who has had 12 hours of rest takes over for another 12 hours... Why all of this isn't clear as day to literally everyone, I had no clue. They proved that you CAN cut the stones with the saw, sand, and water, and they figured that out in one day and got 4 inches. Add centuries of mastering and experimenting with different amounts of sand and water and possibly some kind of oil/lubricant too, and what's so hard to believe if two old men with zero experience managed 4 inches in "a day" which probably was 6 or 8 hours of actual work, rather than 24 hours since those dudes look like they'd have died if they actually worked for 24 hours straight on that stone. 24 hours straight of young men, knowing exactly what they're doing, with centuries of knowledge of how to do it taught to them and years of hands on work doing it, I think they could manage more than 4 inches in a day, probably several feet could be accomplished, and you don't just have one team, they'd have had 100s or 1000s of teams doing this for literally decades straight.
The stone cutting to me isn't hard to believe at all. The precision is very impressive, but I bet there was a lot of trial and error there too, they didn't get it precise on the first try, at least probably not usually, but if you mess up then you can re-use the same stone, making a new cut several inches above your old cut, and try to get it straight enough the next time around. Rinse and repeat, don't need a whole brand new stone, you use the one that is there and take just a small amount off to make it fit as precisely as has been dictated, and not every stone is PERFECT like he shows, many clearly are not this precise, so its not like that precision was mandated for every single stone, perhaps it just worked out that way often enough because they did demand near perfection, so often enough you'll end up with perfection. None of this is that difficult for me to wrap my mind around, I think people just drastically under-estimate the abilities of ancient people, slave labour, and what decades of construction and centuries of experience / knowledge handed down about 1 single culturally important thing can achieve. We think of construction in terms of months or a year or two today. The Egyptians were thinking in terms of decades. They easily could have spent a whole decade pre-cutting stones for the pyramids / major structures, and continued the cutting work endlessly once actual construction began as well, plus the final fit/finishing cuts at the actual construction site to correct the stones that weren't cut within the margins that were mandated. They likely had their best and most experienced stone cutters at the actual site of installation, and less experienced ones were doing the cutting however many miles away the quarries were.
To me this all simply makes sense. People just love a mystery and want to believe something larger than life or some technology better than we have today was at work, totally discounting what 100,000s of experienced people, experts in one, ancient thing, with ancient tech, can acheive, over the course of many decades... Modern people can't wrap their minds around all of this, and prefer to think there has to be more of an explanation and possibly ALIENS HELPED OMG SO COOL RIGHT?!?!
i think you could say it was done by a bunch of exhausted slaves. cant prove it wrong either!
@@shaund4155 Well, it had to be fast because with today's technology, of diamond blade cooled with water, to cut 2.3 millions blocks (for the great pyramid only), they would probably be still working on it...
There should be striations carved into the surfaces of the crystals that make up these blocks. They could be the key into how they were shaped. No matter the method, there has to be signs of wear no matter what method was used. I myself would like to see how they kept the sides so even and with acute 90 degree angles on all 6 sides.
You are right!!!! I agree. Every action leaves a trace.
@@janeg7475 - I believe we should clarify.. Every technology "known" to we the "current humans" may leave a trace . that is really all we know or can state......
Great work, common sense leading your demonstration, very convincing and intriguing.
Humanity seems to be traumatized and part of it is not understanding our true History. I believe if we did know at least we would be able to acknowledge it regardless of good or bad and move forward in a positive light.
Like living on a globe,hurdling through space?😂
@@espears6606 Not sure what you mean here
Good percentage of People are too dumb/ ignorant to comprehend things like this and the government likes to keep the sheeple dumbed down too. Lots of people make dumb comments. Obey consume repeat.
Maybe we were created by whatever built those structures, and then they left.
It's all part of "One World Order"
Perfectly demonstrated, some people might even start to realize how mind boggling this is. I think that it's even more obvious in Peru or south America, it's like 5 axis cnc machining, you can't adjust the 50t stone (because you can't remove it), it has to be perfect and they have one shot . Even if they had a smart trick to cut, that would not explain that accuracy. Thank you for this great video.
Next comment down and u find ur answer
Thermal expansion and settling over time and seismic events no doubt made these gaps tighter than they were during construction, I'm not convinced this is anything especially impressive.
@@DesmondCreighton i thought the same. Surely their weight alone, would flatten them whrn they were being moved around. But definitely minor earthquakes would create a tight fit.
The key shocking factor of the Mesoamericans: they didn't even have metal tools.
@@RByrne Maybe for the ones that are stacked on top of each other, but not for the blocks that are side-to-side.
Excellent work!
Brilliant video mate
I remember looking at those tools bronze tools in school and bluntly telling my teacher that those were woodworking tools. I had to sit in the corner the rest of the topic.
You were wise beyond your years.
For people wondering what "Tons" weigh, or what weight they're similar to in real life...
When Bright Insight says a block weighs 50 TONS....that is basically 25 SUV vehicles of weight...in ONE Block. The average SUV is TWO tons.
Just to give perspective on how DIFFICULT it would be to move, cut, position, polish....MEGALITHIC ROCK formations.
Imperial Ton = 2,240 pounds UK, 2000 pounds US
Metric Tonne = 1000Kg
Granite weighs about 175pounds per cubic ft. or about 80kgs. So these 50 ton blocks would have to be around 625 cubic ft or around 18 cubic mtrs. These blocks sure dont look like they are 625ft wide and tall now do they... or to put it into more of a perspective. Thats roughly half the height of the statue of liberty. Or about as tall as the entire sphinx's head.
Don't believe everything on the internet.
@@bigmandarr cubic ft is not the same as ft. 5 cubic ft is not the same as 5ft.
@@ethankg9094 I did most the math in cubic metres and just googled the converstion.
its still 18mtrs and a cubic mtr is 1x1x1m so its the same in height,length and width. so 18 cubic mtrs is 18x18x18m
The X stands for multiplying. So 1 x 1 x 1 = 1 and 18 x 18 x 18 = 5.832 cubic meters. So 18 Cubic Meters are about 3,5 meter x 3,5 meter x 1,5meter.
Cutting mirror image blocks of stone, wood, metal is not as hard as you think it is. The reason we don't do this with stones is because it is simpler and faster to use cement.
Invoking "aliens" just puts the issue of cultural and technological development in a different physical location (proposed off earth). Technology did not develop with the life forms such as grasshoppers and frogs; it developed after humans of various inter related species developed large brains and responded to environment challenges with inventions. Humans in days gone by had their Isaac Newtons, their Marie Curies and their Nikolai Teslas among others.
yeah, everyone seems to assume ancient humans were idiots, clearly that is not the case, it was not aliens, they were just as clever as modern man at problem solving.
Strange how there is little investment into theories about alien technology when it comes to the ancient wonders that were created in Europe but when it comes to Africa, the Middle East, The Americas and (to a lesser extent) Asia there is a _lot_ of stock put into theories about aliens.
Almost makes you wonder if there is a form of cultural chauvinism that drives this sort of thinking 🤔🤔
Nikola Tesla*... he was a Croat-Serb not Russian
@@chrismechanic2000 some don’t believe they were here at all. 🤷♀️
Some more of “nothing to see here”.
@@jessl1934 Not really, more to do with the age (the pyramids were ancient to the Romans) and scale of the monuments. The Europeans had iron as well by the time they were building large scale things.
Only idiots and charlatans promote Alien theories anyway.
a few years ago I've been to Carrara region in Italy and watched the marble industry. I got a feeling for the whole industry, its dimensions, its work processes and steps, the quarrying as such, the transport and logistics. ever since, Egypt and South America SCARE me. I can imagine the industry required for those buildings and cities. NO WAY with "regular" processes. I have seen a mountain, which was missing half of its top, literally. A really weird sight, btw. I estimate the missing volume for that of around one large pyramid. But that marble has been cut out in CENTURIES, the last two of which on industrial scale. The quarrying effort for all of Egypt's stone is unimaginable, in my estimation the whole people of Egypt would have needed centuries - while doing nothing else. The "energy balance" just doesn't work out. There MUST have been a very high degree of machining and "automatisation", in quarrying as well as in transport/logistic.
The logistics alone for a project the size of the great pyramid would be mind boggling! Nothing happens without first creating a logistical plan. Also the precision of the stone work could not possibly have been achieved with hand tools! If they were using hand tools, they would still be building the pyramids today! Ha!
@@GroberWeisenstein As long as you say so.
@@GroberWeisenstein the Egyptian civilization that we are aware of did not have the materials necessary to shape the hardness of the stones used. The majority of the stones do exhibit surface tooling that is not even remotely close to the limited hand tooling that the archeologists insist was used. At least Petrie had the professional integrity to admit that the stones exhibited sophisticated machine tooling that was superior to anything that we have developed so far.
The unifirm plates, vases, pitchers, and cups that were extracted from granite, schist, and alabaster that look like they were milled on a lathe by a completely unknown technique.
Subsequent Egyptians were unable to duplicate the items and instead could only create pottery that was far more inferior and less impressive.
Be for real.
Egypt has a lot of interesting historical mysteries ! Everyone wants to know "Who built the pyramids?" It is said that one of the pyramids is built at a spot in such a way that any time of the day - that pyramid ( The Pyramid of Giza ) does not cast a shadow. What kind of mathematical calculations were needed to build such a pyramid at that exact specific spot to accomplish that ? How did the pyramid builders know and survey and find such a place ?
10:22 shows your the one with no qualifications. Next time you comment watch the whole video. 😒
I would love for Archeology to take this part seriously, and look at the contact surfaces to detect how much of the rock actually touches. For example, if done by hand there would me little curves, or micro air pockets between the surfaces of the rocks lying on top of each other. If it's like 99% exact, to where there's no deviation that would be mind blowing. Today we get a perfect cut with a machine, but human hands and eyes could never get it that straight.
Very good episode Jimmy, you raise so many good points with factual evidence, well done.
Found out I will be dying soon, so maybe I'll finally know how 🤔 they did it.
I have a theory that they used something to vibrate them as they were stacked so that the resonate frequency would make them sand themselves to a true position with one another. That would also explain why the vertical seams aren't as tight as the horizontal ones.
could be but the real mystery to me is how did they cut those stones
@@peacetoall1858 if i have to guess same as today but it wasnt egyptians rather much older and much more advanced civilization
You know that granite and dolorite is made of different crystals? There is no resonance frequency as every crystalline structure has its own property.
@@xxtoxii9615 I guess anything is possible. I mean there is scientist that studied the erosion on the Sphynx and said the structure was ten thousand years or older as the erosion was made my water which was around at that time. If true, that would put the Egyptians out of the picture and prove your point right. Though an even older civilization cutting stone in that manner is an even bigger mystery.
@@DilbertMuc They can still be shaken.
Japan has these same type walls surrounding the imperial palace in Tokyo, it’s incredible
Preflood demonic built structures. No made by humans.
In Cambodia also in Champa structures...
@@TrollextheTroll demons built it? 😂 What evidence you have for this?
So called 'cyclopian' architectural styles are common for such defensive fortifications for the basic fact that they are insanely difficult to break - to say nothing of weathering the impact of Japanese geological problems so very well.
@@mnomadvfx some stones have the same vitrification as the walls in Peru
The cuts are so precise that it almost looks like the granite was somehow poured into forms as if it were concrete
This is still the best video ever on this subject.
I wish I could take a time machine, just to see these beautiful things built and explore. Seeing how it’s done! Maybe 1 day
If I ever got the ability to time travel, seeing how the pyramids were built would be my #1 destination. These questions NEED answering, but I'm afraid we may never find those answers.
@@JarofMayonaise I'm afraid of just what the answer may be. I mean of course I want proof of some ancient technology or even an ancient alien species that came to help haha.. but if we went back in time and saw something unexplainable as we watch the pyramids being built...It would be fascinating and terrifying at the same time. Like who knows what was done back then! If only
Temperature extremes can cause granite to split. I figured this out once while having a campfire next to a granite boulder. When it was time to leave, to be on the safe side I poured water onto the fire. This quick change caused the granite to sheer, and it did so in fairly flat sheets. Just having a fire on one in the winter has the same effect as the fire cools the air causes the rock to sheer off.
Wouldn't explain everything in the video but just trying to think outside the box. Perhaps temperature manipulation of some form on the rock was the technology. Great video and channel.
I understand thinking out of the box but this part 15:37 tells me that it was not that.
I think he's mislabeling it by calling it "high technology" when the word he's looking for is "arcane technology". They recently found a papyrus written by a contemporary of the pyramid building that didn't fill in all the gaps but actually the peculiar conditions. there were tens of thousands of workers, treated very much like modern construction workers, they flooded the nile and used boats that used rope instead of nail to haul the granite. the jist of what i got from this is that the boy scouts is barely a shadow of what rope and knot technology was
That doesn't explain the cutting just how they may have quarried chunks of the stone, there's a story of Hannibal marching his army through the alps and splitting a large bolder that was blocking their path using the method you describe.
Good job thinking out of the box
Big fire for that 50 ton block . .
Not that Jimmy needs it, but I am starting to make it a career of supporting him in comments online. The first indication of trouble is when someone identifies themselves as an Egyptologist. They give out those degrees online these days. Look into what they study - it’s basically just programming them for group speak.
They had a technology that is so different from what we have now. That is lost. Something big happened that changed the world. About 15 thousand years ago.
As my Egyptology professor used to say, “Just because the Ancients didn’t have electric toasters, couldn’t post on Facebook, Instagram or Twitter, and couldn’t binge on “Kardashians” marathons, doesn’t mean they were morons...”.
I'd argue that those things aren't hallmarks of intelligence anyways, but yeah... he's right
They had the same sized and same evolved brains that we do. Given their resources, they clearly put them to better use.
@Bang Upyourbumhole nope
Tango Nevada - Clearly. Sometimes.
@@dorianphilotheates3769 I would say clearly, regularly. The vast majority of humans today would be helpless with no electricity and the Social Structures we have to help people survive.
As someone who has spent decades cutting and fitting many different types of stone,that had tiny weights in comparison, i say you are SPOT ON !! there is NO way those blocks were cut with copper or bronze tools, even if they had the best tools we have today ,it could not be duplicated. some questioned to be answered honestly no matter how smart you want to look to others ..WE DONT KNOW HOW THEY DID IT !!!!!
A lot of people know how my friend. They have even been re-created but if more people knew this there wouldn't be so much money to be made because its not very interesting
@@joncook6167 you are both missing extremely important points. the fact that these pyramids you are discussing are on the dollar bill in North America which has no connection to Africa especially not Egypt. At least to our knowledge. You see, these elites or 1%ers are in fact decedents of the families who ruled Egypt and their goal is to conquer and divide. control the masses by controlling our beliefs and what we know, because there is much more to the world and our history than we are led to believe, these unexplainably built pyramids are 1 of billions of examples that could be made. and divide us using the unknown and our differences to make us look at one another differently and this competitive society we live in only fuels this agenda. wake up people we must take back control of our lives and remove Satan from our realm so that the people may not suffer any longer and we can transform hell into heaven
/facepalm
or those who know are not telling.....
@@joncook6167 I know how to teleport. But i will not show you!
Thanks for restoring faith ! I watched documentaries on stone masons and archaeologists giving their “ expert” opinion that granite could be cut with various combinations of copper with sand , granite chunks with water blah blah … all these people tried only for a few hours max and then hypothesised .. I was left always feeling “ wtf” … your video restores faith that the ancients did use some other means unknown to us to achieve these marvellous feats in those times …
I'm off this Sunday, Pyramids Tuesday. Cannot wait. I'm going to follow your footsteps Jimmy.
Well I'm here, the locals keeping to a script. These pyramids were not built by Egyptians. Having crawled up the main shaft, every word Jimmy states is true. Put it like this, the granite 80 tonne blocks in the So called Kings chamber were better fitting than the Marble tiles in the hotel bathroom! So I was told today by my guide, it took 20 years to erect the great pyramid, yet she said me, the Egyptians only worked for 3 months of the year for fear flooding. So that means at least 100 years.Off the Bent Pyramid tomorrow!
@@cureit9161thanks for a great story. Must be amazing to see it in real life. It took my city 2 years to build a roundabout, so 20 years for Pyramids seem off...
Has anyone dismantled a few precisely fitted stones to see how smooth the overall-inside surface is ? That would be amazing to see, and I’m sure the inside surface would clearly show the machine marks preserved from weathering
ive always thought the same thing, i think they dont do it cuse of it being a historical monument. but separating 1 stone have to be possible somewhere..
I was thinking the same thing...
Stones in the serapeum are flat to a tolerance of 500th of an inch
@@olo_smooth_olo5606 where did you find that out?
@@peeinacan1 Original Egyptologists discovered this using benchmark techniques available at the time. Jimmy has a video about this. Modern lasers and benchmark techniques have verified older measurements recorded. Benchmarking began in 1800s methinks. Maybe 1700s with the flat plate.
I was born in Ethiopia in Asmera. They have astounding stone structures there too. I have been to Egypt a few times and Petra too.
the stones were molded.... Scythian's Suerian's, Inca's etc knew it....
Ive seen some of the Ethiopian stonework.Lalabelia area is out of this world.
The angel carved church carved from top down in one huge granite mountain. Amazing.
Shhhh. It's supposed to be "olive colored" peoples designing and executing these miraculous works. Can't let black people have a dignified history and legacy. Goes against white supremacy.
@@andrasm.5119 If the stones were molded, then they would have to melt the stone. In addition, there would be molds left over. There would also be all kinds of scraps of leftover bits of melted and rehardened rock like they have every time they use concrete.
In addition, melting the rocks makes no sense. How do the Egyptians carry liquid rock up to the top of a pyramid? That's harder than carrying solid rock.
In short, it is nonsense and there would be a ton of evidence left if any part of it was true.
Gary! You are a barely human ape gawking at the shiny and pretty things. Have you seen donuts? THEY'RE AMAZING!
Dude you’re so Steezed in that photo, biceps’s for daaays!
Love the show, thanks for the endless grind.
The stones go together perfectly because they were cut out of 1 chunk and then moved somehow and stacked from the original cut.
Im just assuming those blocks were polished. Imagine what that place looked like in the hay day? Gleaming.
Equally impressive is the insides of the corridors where the surface is not polished at all but the workmanship is just as precise regarding the impossible fitting of the blocks.. (like spending billions of "dollars" on fit -and hardly any money on finish).
Wouldn’t that be fascinating!! To go back and see some of yesterday’s history and go “Ahhhh, that’s how they did it” or “that’s what that strange item really is and used for” then laugh at today’s conclusions of our archeologists and scientists or even engineers.
@@numerian4516 they should have asked Omm Sety before she died. She would have known!
@@ljb8157 I was like “who?!?!”. I’ll admit I had to Google and remembered her on “sight” when I saw her pic. Not too late, let’s join hands n chant…….
@@numerian4516 lol I never know what to believe but she was impressive. The things she knew seemed impossible
He's here! They haven't silenced him yet, guys!
Rejoice! A cause for celebrations *brings out whiskey*
Yet?
@@terkelalgevind529 lol cheers to that 👌
Ah yes the evil kabal of archeologists are really out to get a pseudo scientist. If he can even be called that.
This is how I explain this channel to my friends.. I say boys you’ve gotta watch this guy before the fbi off him 🤣
My hypothesis is that the "Egyptians" were a civilization that came AFTER the original builders. There's more to the history than what we learned in school.
The truth is... We still don't know the truth and may never know. These structures cannot be built today in my opinion. Great video.
Got to agree, The Egyptians just didn't have the tools to do the job so the obvious conclusion is it was done by a previous unknown civilisation and utilised by the Egyptians. Imagine if you will, that New york or London or Paris was abandoned, and our civilisation ceased to exist, and 100 years later aboriginals sailed from aus and claimed it for themselves, 4000 years later they would be trying to figure out how aborigines with boomerangs managed to build the empire state building or the Eiffel tower or Buckingham Palace.
@@iamrocketray Yes, agree with you! And another point is - Why isn't there records(Hieroglyphics) of the construction? A civilization this advanced and zero documentation?
Go talk to the Kemet people in their videos here. Tread lightly.........
You're right
@@iamrocketray that's so chilling to think about.. Like who built it what capabilities did they have
The mindblowing amount of work needed to construct these mega structures suggests to me that there is more to the pyramids than just a burial plot. I like the power generator theory myself.
The simplest evidence for this is that _no mummies have been found in pyramids. Ever_ . There's a fascinating kind of slight-of-hand used in reporting the finding of mummified remains. Reports will associate mummies with pyramids by talking a lot about the pyramid, then talking of mummies found _near_ said pyramid. To date, none have ever actually been found to house tombs at all. And yes, the power generator theory is pretty intriguing. Beauval's work on this is extensive.
@@Kaotiqua The Giza plateau is A NECROPOLIS, as in one giant burial ground full of tombs and only tombs. Why exactly would they be anything other than tombs when they're Built exactly like the majority of other Old Kingdom Egyptian tombs? It's not a f*ck power generator lmao 🤣 There is absolutely zero evidence to even come anywhere near that claim.
@@CleanupKrew7 you're missing their point. The pyramids themselves didn't seem to have mummies in them, while many other structures the Egyptians we know housed these mummies.
The power generator theory comes from the theory of "antiqitech", which involves drawing charge from the atmosphere using positive and negative charges and an obelisk or high point (the tops of the pyramids were capped in a conductive metal).
This type of technology is what Nikola Tesla was working on when his work was confiscated by the government. It involved a large copper disk set underground in the water table, involved ionization, and a tower to conduct the charge.
Given the sphinx is most likely a water feature, the theory the pyramids were used to draw a small electrical charge isn't totally out there.
I'm not sure I believe this theory but its incredibly obvious that the pyramids are far more mysterious and impressive than we often think. Their location, construction, mathematics, surrounding structures, and the accuracy in which these were all achieved is hard to believe.
The word pyramid is derived from the Greek words PYRAMIS and PYRAMIDOS. The meaning of the word Pryamis is obscure and may relate to the shape of a pyramid. The word Pyramidos has been translated as "Fire In The Middle".
Yes, i believe that the pyramides were used as big tesla coils to give electrcity just by mixing different liquids to boost the power.
They could use that for the lightbulbs they found pics of and many other things like cars and such.
Well, just a theory so who am i to play king :D
The stone VASES they made, with a small opening and totally even (thin) wall thickness, are mind-boggling! ⚱🔍📐
Yeah the ones that are made of diarite and granite, but yet have clay lids, that anyone with common sense can tell that's something not right. If they can machine bowls made of granite!,andisite,diarite, with that level of precision only to put clay lids on them does not and I repeat absolutely does not make sense.
Yes, I agree. Putting the pyramids and other immense structures aside, the vases you both mention are mind-boggling. Even today, I think you'd have to reinvent the design of a tooling lathe to duplicate these incredibly precisioned artifacts. And that's only if we actually could...
@@chrisgross4720 it makes sense if the high quality items were treasures from a long forgotten past and then they just added clay lids to these treasures in a Mad Max post-apocalyptic way.
It's literally something we cannot recreate today. This should have been the biggest news in the world when those bowls were discovered. Every news network should have been asking what the repercussions of a lost technology once existing on Earth is. But no. No one cares besides people like us. It's sad
@@chrisgross4720 Why do we put metal lids on a glass jar? I don't find using a different material for the lid and the base of a container that odd at all.
It would be awesome if upon our deathbeds, we were granted the knowledge of one mystery in the history of man.
This would be my number one.
Why does my dryer have such an appetite for my socks would be number two.
Mine would be why do people keep pushing the button waiting for an elevator? Do they think it speeds it up?
why is nobody questioning the possibility that the stones were created on location from molds in place, which is far more likely than carrying them and cutting them. molds would be absolutely perfect cuts. and rocks that size had to have been formed at some point since the big bang. they don't come out of an exploding star in that form. they probably get created from molten materials. so why couldn't they have created them from molten materials?
I’m in construction and this level of precision is IMPOSSIBLE by hand not only for air tightness, but to fit so well over the length of the block against the other blocks. There is zero error in degrees.
Watch k2019. They think the rocks were poured like concrete. Seems possible but the heating to 2700 degrees Fahrenheit with a sun lense seems silly.
@@archstanton2818 That’s not even close to an explanation. I mean I could imagine this technique (although highly unlikely) for the stone "plates" on the floor around the pyramid, but not for the big blocks
And some of the seams are made when the stones make an L shape right angle. How the hell!? Not only does it meet perfectly with the stone below it, but also the stone next to it on the other side of an angle.
@@archstanton2818 There is a surprising number of geopolymer scientists that believe this was entirely possible, although I'm with you on the giant magnifying glasses. There's also a guy who believes the stones were all floated into place with air bladders. A huge water tube of sorts ran up the sides. I would think the water pressure at the base would have been far greater than a wooden sluice could hold, not to mention the need for pumping water to a height of 400 feet.
@@archstanton2818 except that’s not how granite works. Also to heat something with these dimensions up to that temperatures you need a lense the size of a football field, please at least do the math or you know do an experiment to prove this is even possible. Otherwise this is no different from saying it was aliens with lasers and stuff idk.
This is a perfect example of how ridiculous what we were taught in school was. Thanks Jimmy for presenting true facts.
What facts? He's just rambling on and on saying nothing but "We are not able to do it even today".
Fact is these things were done with basic geometry knowledge, a l ot of manpower and a lot of time.
@@BrightInsight Jimmy, my friend. Have you entertained the thought that some of these may have been petrified during the YD disaster? For me that explains these impossible drill holes etc. It may originally have been working with a soft material.. it might be an explanation to all this crazy stone work, the drill holes, the angles,the insane weight and the Scoop marks... if so.. how old are these things!? Or did they under go rapid petrification thanks to the conditions of the younger dryas disaster? Would love to hear your thoughts on this. Maybe we are actually looking at imprints ..a shell of what was there .."so close you can't fit paper into them" maybe cause they might be petrified and it's just an imprint left over..
Interesting thought experiment if not anyway
@@dieterkohler2206 Denial is a hell of a drug.
Even if we did figure it out its just mind boggling man there society was just on a whole different level
Usually the simplest explanation is the answer. The ancients had the ability to mold granite like we mold cement. The quarries were used to crush the granite and transport it unrefined to the sites being constructed. The pyramid is a good example. Poured granite. Any other explanation is supernatural.
The stone coffin with the mistake, that is an interesting cut. It keeps getting wider, making a V. Saws do not do that from what I have observed. A saw cuts a groove approximately equal to the blade width. I wonder what would make a widening cut?
Water jet.
one sawcord makes a small cut, when adding a second sawcord the cut will widens , adding a third ... aso
It looks like the one side moved outward, making the cut wider and this movement is what made the cut go out of line. It begs the question, was this block in clay form?
The block moved while the blade was cutting so it cut into the side then the lid was pushed away which caused it to break off.
@@dos3622 Even if it was dead soft high tech cutting and measuring equipment would have been needed.
I'm a graduate of civil engineering and still amazed by these structures.
@Jacob Von Schnitzelnazi III How about this as a simple explanation - they cast them in place like concrete.
@Jacob Von Schnitzelnazi III A French Geopolymer Institute has replicated the blocks with an ancient style of concrete ruclips.net/video/znQk_yBHre4/видео.html&ab_channel=GeopolymerInstitute
@@brettgallagher5306 so you mean they brought soil from 600 kilometers away and consolidated them into rocks on site? That's probably even more amazing than what they actually did :))
It cannot be compared to concrete slabs because you can clearly see the line between them indicating that they are separate objects and not casted
@@armincal9834 Soil? Lol no. They ground the rock into a powder then added a natural binding agent. Watch the video in my second comment.
If you cast a block on top of another dry block you can still see the join.
Why do you find this so amazing?
@@brettgallagher5306 OK this makes more sense. I guess I find it amazing because people insist that these blocks are actual rocks.
Great video. I've long since disregarded the theory that they just threw masses of man power at the stone cutting, especially to that degree of perfection. It is an absolute enigma.
Even if you could make such perfect cuts and move su h enormous blocks, you still have to have the ability to perfectly place them in the structure. Placing them perfectly is unimaginable.
I’d almost guarantee that the tools they found were what were used by the people there for lots of *other* building and tool-making options - scaffolding, houses/doors/roofs, and yeah, the furniture that was mentioned. Probably for making everyday items like dishes, as well,
Hardly likely it was the pyramids, themselves. ; )
I am convinced that the shapes of the walls and the perfect alignments indicate a soft, concretion or molten nature of the materials in them.
Exactly, if polygonal masonry were made of clay, no one would question how to form multi(5+) sided or tight fitting joint pieces. The most reasonable explanation would be that the granite was pliable when stacked and then formed, instead of cut before placing it.
Your forgetting about fusion, that place where cold and hot become one - like in welding. You would not see seams like that, as they’d be fused get something molten with an UNmolten item.
Look at The Movie Great Pyramid K 2019. It does not have all the answers (i.e. giants). But it is very informative. Personally I believe that the metric system was given by God through the Biblical Joseph (Imhotep). The Egyptians prospered and went worldwide because God blessed them through Joseph.
Super concrete that looks like quarried stone
@@entombedlamb5356 The theory has some elegance...but no proof ! .If the granite were pliable /mouldable when stacked , slumping would occur and therefore some sort of former or shuttering would be required to prevent this untill hardening had taken place. But then we are faced with the same problems regarding shaping and cutting hard granite stone !. But the stonework is there, the construction did take place and therefore there IS an answer. Keep thinking,stay safe.
If only there was an abundance of a material used to abrade a stone down to a precise surface somewhere in all that desert....
With the tools the Ancient Egyptians supposedly had, Its fairly obvious that they did not build these structures.
Not to mention the Great Pyramid is 8 sided, and the fact that you can only see all 8 sides from directly above the structure. Insane!
Not many know that. I would have gone to my grave not knowing about that little trick had it not been for a RUclips video pointing it out, which got me to looking and wow. That's just so cool! I'm 67 now and it is good to know the world still has some jewels of surprise for me.
Wait wut
@@Chuck8541 If you see it from the side, in the right light, you can just make out the slight "dent" of the lines. I've noticed it in a few ground level photos. But you are right, until that pilot took a picture of it from above on the equinox (or solstice; I can never remember which), no one had ever noticed before.
Yeah of course it's got 8 sides, I mean why wouldn't they make that structure even more complicated and impressive? Haha, everything they did was stupidly difficult. It's like "Hey, the people of the future might doubt our badassery one day, so let's flaunt the hell out of our skills with this one. Really blow their minds with it so they don't go on believing we were just early-man idiots smashing and chiseling away with dolerite and copper tools and sawing 2.5million 2.5ton blocks at 2mm an hour for 20 years."
Well they tried to tell us.
You can only see it on the equinox from up above which is even more crazy.
"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic." -- Sir Arthur C. Clarke
No advanced technology needed. It was poured concrete formed to look like it was cut, no different than a civilization 2000 years from now examining our concrete roads and sidewalks and being in awe at how we "cut" and "moved" such large sections of stone.
@@sorcerykid There is a solid theory there was a use of amalgamates to form many of these rocks, especially those used in the Pyramids. However the granite stones and other harder rocks used in Egypt and elsewhere are the stickler here. Grinding up or crushing hard rock is just as difficult as cutting it.
@@sorcerykid sorry wrong granite rock is not a type of concrete
There is no magic here, even with a possible sound levitation method for heavy rocks like Hutchison etc demonstrated and Liedskalnins may have. It is normal physics, just an extreme form of use of it.
@@Macgyrl64 I disagree. I know people making concrete products that are hard to distinguish between natural stone. You can have laborers breaking it up, transport tons per shipment and then form and cast it in place. Thousands of years later it's near impossible to tell the difference. But if you take a BB and place it under a stone block and allow it to bear the weight, it will crack the stone. Therefore cutting the stone block in multiple perfect facets seems impossible compared to casting it in place.
It's truly impressive. I've worked with granite and stone a long time, almost 20 years. I have marveled at this as well, but I also saw a video where archaeologists took a long copper blade exactly like the ones found in ancient Egypt, poured sand on it while 2 of them pulled out back and forth, and cut halfway through one of those blocks in about 20 minutes leaving a laser precision straight cut. Sometimes things are a lot easier than you think when you know how it's done. I also met a guy once who used to work on the construction of churches and cathedrals. He started talking about constructing stain glass windows with arches that are 60 ft in height and how much precision and symmetry is involved. He grabbed a piece of cardboard and started sketching and explaining exactly how you calculate it, and it clicked with me, I was like THAT'S how they made those statues in Egypt perfectly symmetrical. Sometimes things are a lot easier than you think when you know how it's done. There's also a man in Ohio who demonstrated he could construct a replica of Stonehenge and lift megaton blocks and place them on top of others very high in the air, by himself with no one helping him. He says if it works for 1 lb it works for 100,000 lbs. He does it on video and shows you how he does it. He's on RUclips. Sometimes things are a lot easier than you think when you know how it's done.