Yup'. I remember studying an early 1600's document when Elisabeth the First was quote as "Queen of England, France and Ireland". It was quite funny to see that the Hundred Years War didn't fully resolved the succession quarell.
They didn't even consider him a candidate until his mom sent a letter to the Peers. Women couldn't inherit the throne, and if that had been possible, it would still have been someone else.
Axe and Shield That's funny. Edward III, aside from belonging to the French Angevin Plantagenet dynasty on his father's side, also had a French mother, Isabelle of France, with whom he spent much of his childhood in exile in France before she invaded England with a mercenary army to take the throne from Edward II. Through his mother he was also the grandson of the French king Philip the Fair (which was the entire basis for his claim on the throne of France). Everything about his reign shows that he was extremely French not only in culture, but also in his way of thinking, as he essentially did exactly the same thing for England as his ancestors the great Capetian kings had done for France. And while he was possibly the first king of England to be fluent in English and he encouraged its use precisely in his attempt to create an English nation, he still spoke French at court just like every king of England since 1066. Does "honi soit qui mal y pense" ring any bells? I don't even know what you mean by 1204 but any notion of English nationalism in the time of Johan sanz Terre is absurd.
Axe and Shield You're clearly far too emotionally invested in 19th century English nationalist mythology to be in any way objective on this. There clearly was no such thing as English nationalism in 1204 since in 1217 most of the English nobility still had no problem supporting the French dauphin Louis for the throne of England. Losing most of their possessions in France certainly contributed to detaching the nobility of England from their French identity in the long term, but it certainly didn't turn them into "patriots" overnight, and the Angevins continued to cling to their territories in France until they lost the Hundred Years War. So much so that they were willing to pay homage to the kings of France for them. Trying to link the Magna Carta to nationalism is even more laughable, the Magna Carta was a bunch of French barons demanding extra rights from a French king, which immediately failed leading to the Barons' War (and the brief proclamation of another French king). Killing French people has never disqualified anyone from being French. Don't you think it's rather pathetic to claim someone who was French by ancestry and by culture and who dedicated his entire reign to his claim as king of France, using England as nothing but a source of cannon fodder to help him obtain France, to be an Englishman? Edward III didn't speak French because it was a "fashion" across Europe, that was in the 17th and 18th centuries. He spoke French because he and the entire rest of the nobility of England were French people. And him the Frenchest of them all, most notably in the way he invented and encouraged English national identity, in pure imitation of what his ancestors from Philip Augustus to Philip the Fair had done for France.
+Axe and Shield Dude you say bullshit too, the anglo-saxone people named him Edward III but he was real named itself and by the nobility (who were predominantly francophone) Edouard III. You can find this funny but the french practiced by the majority of the noble house in england is originally of the majority of the english (30% for french against 29% for Latin and 26% for German). No he is not "french" at 100% but his culture was french, he spoke french, he don't knew spoken very well english. And he was named in french by her mother, and his house came of France. He is more french than english but he rest a english king like Guillaume le Conquérant (William the conqueror) as you called, or Richard Coeur de Lion (who has spent many more time in France(Aquitaine) than England) The two country were very close culturally but far away diplomatically. It is impossible to say that these kings are completely English or french in England.
Yes I'm catalan and live in France :) It's a good comparison with USA and GB. Edward was afraid that the English language disappears totaly in favor of French so he is one of the first english leader to promulgate decrees for this language. But principaly, It's the Lancaster (a a branch of the Plantagenet) who participated wiith the Tudors. You have right on Georges Washington, same if Edouard III was not "french" at 100%, the fact remains that he had more love for England and interests than France, of course. The language at this period are interesting, I don't know for england but many region of France were a mix beetween French and native language like the norman language. An uchronie than I saw said, if England had won, she spoke today french, because the island was sparsely populated against France which was the most populous country in Europe.
england didn't lose but they were like donald trump they couldnt believe they lost, and continued to claim france's throne until 1801 all english kings in ceremony delceared themselves as King of England Ireland and France
@@gutsjoestar7450 that doesnt make sense "england didnt lose" followed by "they couldnt believe they lost" In other word, England lost the 100 years war, sure they won a few wars and very prestigious battle IN the series of conflict that make up the 100 years war, but in the end they *lost* the hundred years wars, England did not manage any sort of "tie" with France since they are the one who claimed the kingdom of France and lost nearly all of their continental possession despite nearly winning at one point
Cortez Tortez Not always how it works. The Hundred Years War was fought primarily over English claims on the French throne. As the English failed to take the throne, and after 116 years of conflict actually lost territory, they lost by all means. Edit: Additionally, the English crown surrendered all claims to the French throne in 1800, so even under your much narrower definition, they lost, just much much later.
Filips van Artevelde was a Flemish patriot that was the leader of the Ghent Rebellion. . His story is of that an ordinary citizen who never established a noble title but still had intimate connections with the English king Edward without any mediation. He was the godson of the English queen and above all the political leader of Ghent who took over almost the entire county of Flanders.
Technically speaking, it was more of a civil war. The King of England was also Duke of Normandy. These wars started because as Duke of Normandy the English King was in line to become the French king, but the other Dukes disagreed as he was descended maternally rather than paternally invalidating his claim under Sallic law. . During this time the English King spoke French as did Parliament. Fun fact: It wasn't until the rise of the French Republic that the King of England stopped claiming the throne of France.
Maybe they failed to capture French territory then , but in the long run they became a global naval power that checked French Aggression against England across the Channel.
+Erwan Marie There was a crossover point. By 1250, an English chronicler (I forget his name) writes that most of the English aristocracy were having to learn French as a second language, implying that English was their first.
+Henry Simon That's true, the adoption of English started with one of the Edwards, I think - but initially it was simply a conflict between two French royal houses. And I believe it was Churchill who pointed out that winning the war was France's greatest mistake - a Plantagenêt victory would mean a francophone England
After the invasion of William duc of Normandy all the English kings were actually french. For example Richard Lionsheart spent only 2 months in England during his life. He prefered to live in Angers.
Axe and Shield Bollocks, Normans spoke French, lived in France, they cooked French food... By 1066 two centuries had passed since Rollo settled in Normandie, and the Vikings had made efforts to integrate - Guillaume was definitely French. The "Normans were actually Swedish" myth is jingoistic Germanic supremacist bullshit spread by butthurt Anglos who don't want to admit that French people defeated them. edit : by the way, the thing Max P said about Richard's French heritage isn't "nonsense", it's fact, Richard spoke an occitan dialect and a langue d'oïl dialect. I don't know what you mean by "cerdic heritage" - typo? The fact is the Plantagenêt Empire was based in Angers and Chinon, not in London
Among the 185 battles that France has fought in the last 800 years, its armies will have won 132 of them, and will have lost 43, leaving only 10 battles undecided Thus giving the French military the record of victories in Europe and therefore in the world. France is the nation that has participated in the greatest number of wars and battles in all of Human History.
@@user-um8vh2uc1y Seems so, though the vast majority of defeats comes since 1814 and up. Napoleonics (their old army didn't even defend their kingdom from the revolution), Mexican expedition, Franco-Prussian, WW1, WW2 especially, Indochina War... It seems times of Louis XIV were the last time of big triumphs.
@Le Dahut d'en haut The Plantagenet House and Lancasters were English. The fact that they spoke French means nothing since the Queen can speak French today. That doesn't make her French. French was just an important language.
@Le Dahut d'en haut Everything descends from something. But that doesn't mean anything. The English were not ruled by "french" elites. England ruled Normandy. Not the other way round. The conquest of William the Conqueror was 300 years before the 100 years war.
@Le Dahut d'en haut The Queen is still Duke of Normandy. And it's hard to call the Tudor House English when all the rulers were Kings of England. And they were very little Welsh.
They didn't conquer thoses lands. In fact, Normandy, a vasal of France (which was pretty much french in every aspect) invaded England and succesfully conquered it. All thoses land were just under normandy's king control.
As always I mean. Thanks for the dedication, I really appreciate what you do because I know there probably isn't a very big income insentive so that just makes your quality of work that much more amazing.
We now killed each other for less than the stuff we used to. Really, it is pathetic how low we have fallen. No wonder no Aliens anywhere want to even invade us.
Battle of Patay, called the "Reverse Agincourt", a stag gave away the English position, what followed was a brief deliberation and a stunning immediate cavalry charge (outnumbered 3 to 1) led by Etienne de Vignolles and Jean Poton de Xaintrailles (St. Jeanne's comrades), resulting in a humiliating defeat of the English invaders. One of the most decisive battles of the Hundred Years War. English occupation would be broken completely at the Battle of Castillon and the English would be so traumatized they would never again dare to attack France one-on-one. Doesn't get enough coverage tho due to global Anglo bias.
The little blue scratch was Joan of Arc. The blue swallowing the red was her companion-in-arms, Arthur III de Richemont, brother of the Duke of Brittany, step-brother to Henry V, and brother-in-law to the Duke of Burgundy.
Great game! Playing as France rn, won the HYW annexed most of burgundy and got a personal union over Austria, now Poland, Sweden, Spain and Bavaria are my allies so aggressive expansion is really not an issue, great game thank god for lucky nations lol!
@@transdimensionalmeerkat9378 you apparently don't understand to what degree the Commonwealth was libertarian, at least at the beginning. Sure, they got de-nationalized later, but firstly it was mutual. And Lithuania was the biggest friggin european state since Charlemagne to Napoleon, bigger than both of em, even having fief over moscow at one point. So, you're stupid
''For as long as Winston can recall, England has been in a constant state of war [with France] and it was a war of neither importance nor consequence.'' The year 1409.
They invaded England but were immediately put in their place by a smaller English force and their king was taken prisoner. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Neville%27s_Cross
That's the 2nd Scottish war of independence ending. They won their independence for a second time and signed a treaty. The king of Scotland David II was released and made to pay money to England. The english didn't want to fight on 2 fronts as they were focused more on france. They captured David in 1346 but released him as part of the treaty in 1357. The English originally wanted to conquer Scotland and put Edward Balloil son of John Balloil on the throne of Scotland but failed. So it's wrong to say that Scotland did nothing.
Great video! On the subject of the Hundred Years' War, do you have a video for the Wars of the Roses? That started as a direct result of England losing this one.
I don’t think I’ve met a single British person who denies we lost this war, and I live in England lol. Most people don’t even know what I’m talking about when I ask them.
Do you know why an English king would claim the French throne ? Because his dynasty was from France. First there was the Normans, then the Angevins. The majority of the English nobility was from France. And even the English language features a LOT of vocabulary from french (something ca. 60% , depending how you calculate it). England and France have a lot in common since 1066. They are best frenemies and eternal rivals.
because France and England are the oldest countries in the world, and they kept fighting eachother since England took its independence from France in the XI century until the XVIII century
Sir Leonor France is a loser country...lost all major wars. The only thing they were succesful was the Algeria war, where they massacred millions unarmed civilists...
***** not at all,the English were plagued by financial difficulties not soldiering ones. the French eventually avoided pitch battles and let the English run out of money. charging through their countryside
It's would have lead to mass instability since England would be annexing a country with a higher population than its own. England would lose chunks of the empire, lose France or its sub states to rebellions, or it could have lead to the outright collapse of the empire.
i am from greece but i really must give my respect to the english they were NOT playing around fighting scotland, irish rebels and crushing other peasant rebellions in england while almost having half france occupied and crusading in Jerusalem wow for me The english never really lost the war they weren't the ones having their country invaded all the time respect to england
lol, the geographic protection was not a factor for the Vikings. England did what they supposed to, developing the best navy in the whole damn world. Also, geography is not always something positive. Look at Africa for example, the best land in the planet, best natural resources, strong genetics, etc.. Still, they were humiliated and dominated.
Bullshit. I've talked to lots of English people about the hundred years war and none of them are like what you're saying. People from France always and I mean ALWAYS try to make the brits seem like obnoxious, unable to accept failure type people, but that's just plain out bs. 90% of Brits just own these kind of things. People who make these claims probably haven't really met very many Brits.
@@ECloudDog No. English are typical arrogant propagandist and revisionnist with a selective memory always trying to deform facts for their own advantage. Another exemple is how they spam everywhere their so-called victory against the Spanish Armada (actually destroyed by a storm) but are totally amnesic about how the English armada was destroyed the next year... WW1 is another exemple: they try to portray the French (who stopped the German advance and had to hold on their own all the western front until 1916) as incompetent and dumb who were saved by the mighty British (who did almost nothing until 1916). Napoleon is another exemple: they spam Waterloo everywhere to make believe to the world that they defeated Napoleon's Empire (while France was already on its knees since the Russian invasion) and while most of the Allied army at Waterloo was not even British, let's not talk about English... The 100 years war is not different, they spam Agincourt everywhere to forget that they lost the war and are totally amnesic about their own humiliating defeats (battle of Patay or battle of Castillon).
Portugal joined the war against France. Portugal helped England in the war, not just because the alliance they maintained but for the help England give to Portugal when Castille invaded the portuguese territory, England sent 3000 longbowmen in Portuguese side, which brought VICTORY to Portugal, and what is curious Portugal had ~7000 troops and Castille had ~20000 troops with ~5000 Italian, Aragonese and french allies. But this time Portugal couldn´t reverse the history just because France is even stronger then England and Portugal together " in that time " sorry for my bad english. ;b
portugal and england have had the longest alliance in history, starting in the crusades and still going, with a brief interruption over a dispute during the scramble for africa
Spain helped France. We destroyed a fleet of 48 English ships, without losing any, at La Rochelle 1372. Spain then invaded southern England with three fleets, in 1377, 1380-81, and 1411, devastating the entire coastline. The Spanish fleet came up the Thames almost to London. We have to help the allies of the European Union! ;)
In this war Spain helped France. In the Battle of La Rochelle 1372, the Spanish fleet sank an English fleet of 48 ships, without losing any (remember that at Trafalgar the English sank 11 Spanish ships, not 48). Then, in 1377, 1380-81 and 1411, the Spanish fleet invaded the south of England, coming up the Thames almost to London.
@@Amaglabiddiaghloughbuite Great battle. Well we've all sunk great fleets -1589. Spain sinks 80 ships of Drake's invincible English fleet -1571. Lepanto. 200 Turkish ships sunk by Spanish NATO in Italy -1585. Miracle of Empel. 100 Dutch ships sunk by Spain in a single night -1625. 62 ships of the combined English and Dutch fleet sunk and captured at Cádiz -1741 Cartagena de Indias. 50 British Royal Navy ships destroyed -1741-48 More than 400 British ships (military and merchant) captured in the Atlantic. -1779-80. Capture of two British fleets of 24 and 55 ships, during the naval blockade of Spain against England. -Some Japanese pirate fleets sunk, and fleets of 40 ships of the German Hanseatic League. Or combined fleets from Portugal and France. We also have defeats, of course, like Trafalgar, Cabo Passaro or Cabo San Vicente.
Reasons for France being strong -They kicked the English out -They Won Reasons for England being strong -The French never stepped foot in England -They still held on to the Channel islands, formally part of Normandy.
Fun fact, the Edward III's candidacy was probably stronger than that of Philipp V according to the Salic law : Edward III (d. 1377) - Edward II (d. 1327) - Edward I (d. 1307) - Henry III (d. 1272) - John (d. 1216) - Henry II (d. 1189) - Geoffrey of Anjou (d. 1151) - Fulk V of Anjou (d. 1143) - Fulk IV of Anjou (d. 1109) - Geoffrey II of Gâtinais (d. circa 1045) - Hugo of Perche (circa 1028) - Fulcois of Perche (circa 1 000) - Gauzfred of Châteaudun (d. 989) - Gauzfred of Chartres (circa 942) - Gausbert (circa 925) - Gauzfred (circa 886) - Gauzfrid of Maine (d. 877) - Rorgo I of Maine (circa 840) - Gauzlin of Maine (circa 820) - unknow - Hervé of Mans (circa 750) - Roger of Mans (cica 710) - Hervé of Hesbayes (circa 692) - Robert (circa 677) - Erlebert (circa 639) Erlebert is the oldest male ancestor of the capetian dynasty...
Britain : I hate france, we are hate each other for thousand years. German Empire : *build some dreadnoughts Britain : WTF, Omg france your country is so good, we are friend right? Our historical relation is very good, wanna form alliance againts German Empire?
I wouldn't call England France's colony, more like Normandy's. The Normans were quite different from the rest of the French, they were descended from Vikings, and the French king also wasn't very happy about losing Normandy after William became king, and from the 1070s started raiding Normandy.
@Autzen Hallock Rollo a Viking that was given the land known as Normandy by the Frankish king with the condition that he would protect the Frankish kingdom against the raids of his own people the Vikings. So his descendant, William The Conqueror, a Norman, took the English throne and became King of England. Suddenly he had lands in both England and France, that's where the conflict begins.
As an Englishman let me explain something - 1/3rd of us have no idea what the Hundred Years War is. 1/3rd get it confused with the Thirty Year and Seven Year Wars, and don’t really care. 1/3rd have a rough idea, can name a king or two. As an Englishman I’m telling you all that it may surprise you just how little your average Joe will know or care about this conflict. So I wouldn’t get too worked up or make such outrageous assumptions about the English.
![Digital Circus Episode 4 [TRAILER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/abZtsmMUbJo/mqdefault.jpg)
The only reason England lost was because france won
+World Patriot France didn't win
Ron bat that's why france is apart of the uk
World Patriot it was a tie neither side lost
Ron bat france defended there turf
World Patriot no they got it back
The hundred years war: EVERY SECOND
Watch it till you die!
Sorry what was that? Can't hear you over the screaming
Wtf
Every nano-second
HAHA i cried🤣
For anyone who is interested, the English Kings would actually continue to claim the French throne until 1801.
Yup'. I remember studying an early 1600's document when Elisabeth the First was quote as "Queen of England, France and Ireland". It was quite funny to see that the Hundred Years War didn't fully resolved the succession quarell.
Their claim was never valid in the first place, it's pretty hilarious.
They didn't even consider him a candidate until his mom sent a letter to the Peers. Women couldn't inherit the throne, and if that had been possible, it would still have been someone else.
Guess Napoleon got rid of that.
mustve been really salty that it lasted for 100 years and it still didnt win
Hundred years war = french kings Vs french kings
Absolute truth.
Axe and Shield That's funny.
Edward III, aside from belonging to the French Angevin Plantagenet dynasty on his father's side, also had a French mother, Isabelle of France, with whom he spent much of his childhood in exile in France before she invaded England with a mercenary army to take the throne from Edward II. Through his mother he was also the grandson of the French king Philip the Fair (which was the entire basis for his claim on the throne of France). Everything about his reign shows that he was extremely French not only in culture, but also in his way of thinking, as he essentially did exactly the same thing for England as his ancestors the great Capetian kings had done for France. And while he was possibly the first king of England to be fluent in English and he encouraged its use precisely in his attempt to create an English nation, he still spoke French at court just like every king of England since 1066. Does "honi soit qui mal y pense" ring any bells?
I don't even know what you mean by 1204 but any notion of English nationalism in the time of Johan sanz Terre is absurd.
Axe and Shield You're clearly far too emotionally invested in 19th century English nationalist mythology to be in any way objective on this. There clearly was no such thing as English nationalism in 1204 since in 1217 most of the English nobility still had no problem supporting the French dauphin Louis for the throne of England. Losing most of their possessions in France certainly contributed to detaching the nobility of England from their French identity in the long term, but it certainly didn't turn them into "patriots" overnight, and the Angevins continued to cling to their territories in France until they lost the Hundred Years War. So much so that they were willing to pay homage to the kings of France for them. Trying to link the Magna Carta to nationalism is even more laughable, the Magna Carta was a bunch of French barons demanding extra rights from a French king, which immediately failed leading to the Barons' War (and the brief proclamation of another French king).
Killing French people has never disqualified anyone from being French. Don't you think it's rather pathetic to claim someone who was French by ancestry and by culture and who dedicated his entire reign to his claim as king of France, using England as nothing but a source of cannon fodder to help him obtain France, to be an Englishman? Edward III didn't speak French because it was a "fashion" across Europe, that was in the 17th and 18th centuries. He spoke French because he and the entire rest of the nobility of England were French people. And him the Frenchest of them all, most notably in the way he invented and encouraged English national identity, in pure imitation of what his ancestors from Philip Augustus to Philip the Fair had done for France.
+Axe and Shield Dude you say bullshit too, the anglo-saxone people named him Edward III but he was real named itself and by the nobility (who were predominantly francophone) Edouard III. You can find this funny but the french practiced by the majority of the noble house in england is originally of the majority of the english (30% for french against 29% for Latin and 26% for German).
No he is not "french" at 100% but his culture was french, he spoke french, he don't knew spoken very well english. And he was named in french by her mother, and his house came of France.
He is more french than english but he rest a english king like Guillaume le Conquérant (William the conqueror) as you called, or Richard Coeur de Lion (who has spent many more time in France(Aquitaine) than England)
The two country were very close culturally but far away diplomatically. It is impossible to say that these kings are completely English or french in England.
Yes I'm catalan and live in France :)
It's a good comparison with USA and GB.
Edward was afraid that the English language disappears totaly in favor of French so he is one of the first english leader to promulgate decrees for this language. But principaly, It's the Lancaster (a a branch of the Plantagenet) who participated wiith the Tudors.
You have right on Georges Washington, same if Edouard III was not "french" at 100%, the fact remains that he had more love for England and interests than France, of course.
The language at this period are interesting, I don't know for england but many region of France were a mix beetween French and native language like the norman language. An uchronie than I saw said, if England had won, she spoke today french, because the island was sparsely populated against France which was the most populous country in Europe.
England: I didn't lose, I merely failed to win!
england didn't lose
but they were like donald trump
they couldnt believe they lost, and continued to claim france's throne until 1801
all english kings in ceremony delceared themselves as King of England Ireland and France
@@gutsjoestar7450 that doesnt make sense "england didnt lose" followed by "they couldnt believe they lost"
In other word, England lost the 100 years war, sure they won a few wars and very prestigious battle IN the series of conflict that make up the 100 years war, but in the end they *lost* the hundred years wars, England did not manage any sort of "tie" with France since they are the one who claimed the kingdom of France and lost nearly all of their continental possession despite nearly winning at one point
@@gutsjoestar7450 "england didn't lose
"
"they couldnt believe they lost"
I fail to see the difference.
Oversimplefiled
WHO WON ? WHO'S NEXT ? YOU DECIDE !
EPIC MAPPING OF HISTORYYY !
French won. End of discussion😂
Mat Seg No one won. The winner of a war is decided by on if one side surrenders or is destroyed.
Mat Seg No one won. The winner of a war is decided by on if one side surrenders or is destroyed.
Cortez Tortez Not always how it works. The Hundred Years War was fought primarily over English claims on the French throne. As the English failed to take the throne, and after 116 years of conflict actually lost territory, they lost by all means.
Edit: Additionally, the English crown surrendered all claims to the French throne in 1800, so even under your much narrower definition, they lost, just much much later.
hahaha
These videos deserve more views for the amount of work you must put in them. Great work!
This was probably difficult as fuck, great work.
Thanks!
EmperorTigerstar can you do a video of the 80 years war?
@@hipbubble7685 whats that
@@laniedulay4043 a war between spain and the netherlands which resulted in dutch independence and led the country into a golden age
@@hipbubble7685 Golden age for netherlands?
England: uses several years to conquer northern France.
Hitler: uses 2 months to conquer France
Napoleon: uses 19 days to get to Berlin.
Hundred Years War: Every Day
rip
Dat moth from the 2016 european final lmao ye
rainius byzantinus_ (RainTheRobloxian) hundred years war: second
day 1: practice longbow by order of his majesty the king of england
day 2: ditto
day 3: ditto
day 4: die of the black plague
sweet video
Every 100 years
England, France.
And most powerfull of all:
GHENT
Filips van Artevelde was a Flemish patriot that was the leader of the Ghent Rebellion. . His story is of that an ordinary citizen who never established a noble title but still had intimate connections with the English king Edward without any mediation. He was the godson of the English queen and above all the political leader of Ghent who took over almost the entire county of Flanders.
3:42 -5:56
Invasion of France Prank (GONE WRONG) [SOCIAL EXPERIMENT]
GONE SEXUAL
1400s
IN THE PARIS RAPED BY FRENCH SOLDIERS
The Average Gamer IN THE HOOD (of Paris)
Technically speaking, it was more of a civil war. The King of England was also Duke of Normandy. These wars started because as Duke of Normandy the English King was in line to become the French king, but the other Dukes disagreed as he was descended maternally rather than paternally invalidating his claim under Sallic law. . During this time the English King spoke French as did Parliament.
Fun fact: It wasn't until the rise of the French Republic that the King of England stopped claiming the throne of France.
suddenly kim jong Il comes up from the future and invades denmark
👏👏👏
+Niska Magnusson wait what? Why Denmark?
because unexpected!
+Niska Magnusson And then fails😂
+Anders Ejlersen Vem gilar inte att se dansken få stryk?
Love the attention to detail on the changing borders of the Republic of Venice throughout the video :)
100 years and England ended up with fuck all.
both sides got technology
that's not technically true, educate yourself.
I meant in terms of land.
Sam H oh well in terms of land we got jack shit lol
Maybe they failed to capture French territory then , but in the long run they became a global naval power that checked French Aggression against England across the Channel.
Two french speaking monarchies fighting each other...
+Erwan Marie There was a crossover point. By 1250, an English chronicler (I forget his name) writes that most of the English aristocracy were having to learn French as a second language, implying that English was their first.
+Henry Simon That's true, the adoption of English started with one of the Edwards, I think - but initially it was simply a conflict between two French royal houses. And I believe it was Churchill who pointed out that winning the war was France's greatest mistake - a Plantagenêt victory would mean a francophone England
After the invasion of William duc of Normandy all the English kings were actually french. For example Richard Lionsheart spent only 2 months in England during his life. He prefered to live in Angers.
Axe and Shield Richard Lionsheart was French. The plentagenet dinasty was French.
Axe and Shield Bollocks, Normans spoke French, lived in France, they cooked French food... By 1066 two centuries had passed since Rollo settled in Normandie, and the Vikings had made efforts to integrate - Guillaume was definitely French. The "Normans were actually Swedish" myth is jingoistic Germanic supremacist bullshit spread by butthurt Anglos who don't want to admit that French people defeated them.
edit : by the way, the thing Max P said about Richard's French heritage isn't "nonsense", it's fact, Richard spoke an occitan dialect and a langue d'oïl dialect. I don't know what you mean by "cerdic heritage" - typo? The fact is the Plantagenêt Empire was based in Angers and Chinon, not in London
4:38 France gives a big middle finger to England
Xd
Joan of Arc really inspired confidence in the French troops, yet It's still hard to believe the war would end decades later!
A united kingdom of Great Britain, Ireland and France, what a power that would have been
A french empire, with england and ireland, what a power that would have been :p
Cyril Maudet
Ah yes all those successful french colonies like Quebec, Haiti and Cambodia :)
Yep, like india, southern rhodesia or south africa for exemple, pretty sure they are proud of ure legacy, like racism and genocide ;p
Cyril Maudet
give the natives freedom and everything they need to prosper, they then proceed to fuck everything up
our "legacy" was justified
well, like french no? we give so many with nothing in return... Damn natives...
1:48-1:50 reminds me of Paul von Lettow's tactics in WW1.
Robert Gratto I´ve always found that little dot running away in Tanzania(?) the most hilarious bit of any video :P
what date in WWI was it
***** watch his video on it, it's pretty easy to spot.
Oh in the description I found it october 1918
juan arias Me too! I laughed the first time I saw it.
Just imagine that. Imagine being a French or British person and the only thing you have known all your life was being in war with the same opponent.
冷静に考えると100年も戦争してたのは凄い🧐
@@canon1729Hiroshima Nagazaki 💥💥💥
@@joaomesquita4242 Are you kid?😄To be adult
@@joaomesquita4242 Loooool
While England and France were fighting each other, Ottoman empire was spreading on Balkans and Anatolia.
Hundred years wars was a missing time
Cenk Özkan Im not think that they we will help Byzantium. But you we will surely know this better than me Turk brother
Doing the Wars of the Roses at some point wouldn't be a bad idea, and maybe a better Vietnam video.
ubertuber3d vietnam needs a new video
War of the roses was an historical event, you know?
@@haradream7394 Why is that important? It would still be interesting to see it mapped
This must have been a total pain to create. Thank you for your patience and determination.
4:37 *Joan of Arc* joined the game
@@yann1462 *Johanne
@@tachy1801 She would write her own name as Johanne, though Jeanne is the correct modern way
@@cordyceps182 Jehanne*
@@MW_Asura You got me there
Joanna
Should've been every minute. xD
Nah every second! XD
DeathDemon141 YES!
***** That's good, That's great.
Every thenth of a nano second
The Random Every googolplexth of a nanosecond!
Among the 185 battles that France has fought in the last 800 years, its armies will have won 132 of them, and will have lost 43, leaving only 10 battles undecided
Thus giving the French military the record of victories in Europe and therefore in the world. France is the nation that has participated in the greatest number of wars and battles in all of Human History.
And still is disgraced with its defeat in the world war II (in 1940) :D
@Paul ice Maybe. Maybe not :D
185 sounds like a very small number actually; during the US civil war in just 4 years there were about 50 huge battles and 100 more significant ones.
@@zerstorer88 I think he meant to say 185 wars, not battles, France has actually won 1115 battles in its history, more than any other country.
@@user-um8vh2uc1y Seems so, though the vast majority of defeats comes since 1814 and up. Napoleonics (their old army didn't even defend their kingdom from the revolution), Mexican expedition, Franco-Prussian, WW1, WW2 especially, Indochina War... It seems times of Louis XIV were the last time of big triumphs.
In fact this war was french kings against another french kings lol
This war was french houses fighting each others
maybe in the other parts of the hundred years war but not the Lancastrian era 1415 - 1453
@Le Dahut d'en haut The Plantagenet House and Lancasters were English. The fact that they spoke French means nothing since the Queen can speak French today. That doesn't make her French. French was just an important language.
@Le Dahut d'en haut Everything descends from something. But that doesn't mean anything. The English were not ruled by "french" elites. England ruled Normandy. Not the other way round. The conquest of William the Conqueror was 300 years before the 100 years war.
@Le Dahut d'en haut The Queen is still Duke of Normandy. And it's hard to call the Tudor House English when all the rulers were Kings of England. And they were very little Welsh.
They may have lost the war but their ability to take over that much territory is pretty impressive, for my opinion. Deep respect for both sides.
They didn't conquer thoses lands. In fact, Normandy, a vasal of France (which was pretty much french in every aspect) invaded England and succesfully conquered it. All thoses land were just under normandy's king control.
@@charliemasson4287 during the war, Normany was conquered and brought under the control of the English under Henry V
Great video as ever.
As always I mean. Thanks for the dedication, I really appreciate what you do because I know there probably isn't a very big income insentive so that just makes your quality of work that much more amazing.
fighters410 Thank you. :)
Very well done! This is a very impressive video, and it clearly took a lot of effort!
GalacticPenguinTV I love you're videos
HDkoolboy gaming sports mapping and more your*
"I love you are videos"?
100 years of humanity killing itself for the glory of kings. I hope we can do better.
Thank you for this video
Now it's a 100 years of humanity killing itself for the glory of central banks.
We now killed each other for less than the stuff we used to. Really, it is pathetic how low we have fallen. No wonder no Aliens anywhere want to even invade us.
Go start wearing lipstick
The Brits don't like to talk about the fact that they lost this war, haha.
GamesLegitament True.
GamesLegitament Eh, we controlled huge chunks of your country for a long time. How much of England went blue during this video?
ubertoaster99 How much of France stayed red?
Went != stayed :o)
ubertoaster99 England failed to conquer France, and that's what the war was about. So England=Loser
No mention of Jeanne d'Arc
A key élément to enderstend the turn over...
4:39
First video without French Surrender jokes :D
France Ball nope xd
England forgot to surrender earlier (How?)that's why the war lasted 116 years
How can you forget what you do the best?
They almost did
Failed to do an England joke
@@draculemihawk10 England sucks
Battle of Patay, called the "Reverse Agincourt", a stag gave away the English position, what followed was a brief deliberation and a stunning immediate cavalry charge (outnumbered 3 to 1) led by Etienne de Vignolles and Jean Poton de Xaintrailles (St. Jeanne's comrades), resulting in a humiliating defeat of the English invaders. One of the most decisive battles of the Hundred Years War. English occupation would be broken completely at the Battle of Castillon and the English would be so traumatized they would never again dare to attack France one-on-one.
Doesn't get enough coverage tho due to global Anglo bias.
Doesn't get enough coverage - do you think people don't know who Joan of Arc is???
@lvan Big Nob ?
fullfist Yes, one of my favorite medieval battles
@Death To The CCP" can’t think of anything worse than speaking or being French"
well being and speaking english actually.
@Death To The CCP it's maybe because you're adopted
imagine the length of the video if it was every day 😂😂😂
Every hour
every second
+Samsid every minute
every millisecond
every milisecond of a milisecond!
The little blue scratch was Joan of Arc. The blue swallowing the red was her companion-in-arms, Arthur III de Richemont, brother of the Duke of Brittany, step-brother to Henry V, and brother-in-law to the Duke of Burgundy.
***** have you ever played europa universalis iv or crusader kings ii ?
No.
***** Ya go play them.
Great game! Playing as France rn, won the HYW annexed most of burgundy and got a personal union over Austria, now Poland, Sweden, Spain and Bavaria are my allies so aggressive expansion is really not an issue, great game thank god for lucky nations lol!
+EmperorTigerstar Don't they're pretty bad. And they both need a load of DLC to be playable.
Victoria 2 is a much better game.
No they aren't there awsome.
Rise and Fall of the Lithuanian Empire!
Lol, the duchy of Lithuania didn't last long, as it was just incorporated into the polish-Lithuanian commonwealth
@@transdimensionalmeerkat9378 you apparently don't understand to what degree the Commonwealth was libertarian, at least at the beginning. Sure, they got de-nationalized later, but firstly it was mutual. And Lithuania was the biggest friggin european state since Charlemagne to Napoleon, bigger than both of em, even having fief over moscow at one point. So, you're stupid
1:38 Scotland is like yeah I'm out
österreich?
they got the plague when they fought
VIVE LA FRANCE !!! C'est génial !!!
''For as long as Winston can recall, England has been in a constant state of war [with France] and it was a war of neither importance nor consequence.'' The year 1409.
Thanks for using my suggestion!
Vive Du Guesclin et La France !
Finally, someone who knows the real heroes of the war. I don't have anything against Jehanne tho
It amazes me how you remembered details such as The Jacquerie Peasant Revolt (1:43).
0:55 I like how Scotland could have done something, but barely did anything and just bailed out a while later.
They invaded England but were immediately put in their place by a smaller English force and their king was taken prisoner.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Neville%27s_Cross
That's the 2nd Scottish war of independence ending. They won their independence for a second time and signed a treaty. The king of Scotland David II was released and made to pay money to England.
The english didn't want to fight on 2 fronts as they were focused more on france.
They captured David in 1346 but released him as part of the treaty in 1357. The English originally wanted to conquer Scotland and put Edward Balloil son of John Balloil on the throne of Scotland but failed. So it's wrong to say that Scotland did nothing.
Burgundy got independence as a result of leaving the alliance with england and giving back paris, that should have been reflected IMHO.
4:35 you were so close, England!
JEANNE! OSKOUR!!!
Jeanne ! Au secours !
hi Jean Marie Le Pen
Great video! On the subject of the Hundred Years' War, do you have a video for the Wars of the Roses? That started as a direct result of England losing this one.
mam162 he has a video on the british isles from 42,000 bce to present day so its in there lol.
The 100 years war, the war that lasted 116 years
(16 years of break)
5:19 is when eu4 starts
I've been waiting for that one. Thanks for putting that up.
I don’t think I’ve met a single British person who denies we lost this war, and I live in England lol.
Most people don’t even know what I’m talking about when I ask them.
I know people who do not know about the first and second world war, it is sad and embarrassing
.
1453 Be like:
Constantinople Falls
100 years War Ends
two tragedies in one year
Constantinpole falls is good for turk history because turks wins
@@egeyakann we didn't say who it was good for, smh.
@@nicodemus7774 how is the end of a war a tragedy?
OTTOMANS WINS
FATALITY
Well done!
I still don't understand why France and UK have so many in common today?
They have almost the same army, population, economy, etc...
Blame germany
Do you know why an English king would claim the French throne ? Because his dynasty was from France.
First there was the Normans, then the Angevins. The majority of the English nobility was from France. And even the English language features a LOT of vocabulary from french (something ca. 60% , depending how you calculate it).
England and France have a lot in common since 1066. They are best frenemies and eternal rivals.
because France and England are the oldest countries in the world, and they kept fighting eachother since England took its independence from France in the XI century until the XVIII century
Герой Российской Империи by country I mean Nation-State
Awesomebob99 And yet we still can't understand a word they're saying
Awesome as always...
2:12 lmao that one group that got chased out
Give to the french a leader and they beacome invincible! Patay will be remember!
Sir Leonor France is a loser country...lost all major wars. The only thing they were succesful was the Algeria war, where they massacred millions unarmed civilists...
Samsung55
just...
open an history book idiot
Samsun55 Napoleon just won over 60 battles but you are right that’s not important 🙄
@@Samsun55 Neither Louis XIV nor Napoleon I were important, eh?
@@Samsun55 Do you ever study history ??
I think Joan of Arc and Burgundy's separation with the English caused the French and English match in strength, if you know what I mean.
Imagine if you were born in 1337 and a war started the same day. Then you die and the war is still going on.
I've got an Alternate History scenario for you. What if England won the 100 years War and anexed France?
England didn't have the power then to annex that much land at that time
Robert Gratto They would have lost it again a few years later. Theyr infantry is just too weak to survive on continental Europe.
Robert Gratto No WW2
***** not at all,the English were plagued by financial difficulties not soldiering ones. the French eventually avoided pitch battles and let the English run out of money. charging through their countryside
It's would have lead to mass instability since England would be annexing a country with a higher population than its own. England would lose chunks of the empire, lose France or its sub states to rebellions, or it could have lead to the outright collapse of the empire.
England was the Fire Nation, Ireland was the Air Nomads, Scotland were the water tribes, and France was the Earth Kingdom.
@Rickinster the avatar was joan of the arc
So does that mean Henry V was the fire lord?
i am from greece but i really must give my respect to the english
they were NOT playing around
fighting scotland, irish rebels and crushing other peasant rebellions in england
while almost having half france occupied and crusading in Jerusalem
wow
for me The english never really lost the war they weren't the ones having their country invaded all the time
respect to england
Hey thanks man, some people just never look at the facts close enough. You did...😉😉😉
Lol, do you think that France had no other enemies than England during that time ? Just look at the map...
the problem of France, like every other countries in Europe, is to not have a sea who protect their asses..
lol, the geographic protection was not a factor for the Vikings. England did what they supposed to, developing the best navy in the whole damn world. Also, geography is not always something positive. Look at Africa for example, the best land in the planet, best natural resources, strong genetics, etc.. Still, they were humiliated and dominated.
France send their knoghts in Crusades too , but at they end they almost won .
Britain can't admit the fact that they lost the Hundred years war xD
Brits's ego in general doesn't let them admit that they loose anything, even after showing them clear proofs.
We beat Napoleon.
+LightningSamus The Plantagenets were an English family from 1217.
Bullshit. I've talked to lots of English people about the hundred years war and none of them are like what you're saying. People from France always and I mean ALWAYS try to make the brits seem like obnoxious, unable to accept failure type people, but that's just plain out bs. 90% of Brits just own these kind of things. People who make these claims probably haven't really met very many Brits.
@@ECloudDog
No. English are typical arrogant propagandist and revisionnist with a selective memory always trying to deform facts for their own advantage. Another exemple is how they spam everywhere their so-called victory against the Spanish Armada (actually destroyed by a storm) but are totally amnesic about how the English armada was destroyed the next year...
WW1 is another exemple: they try to portray the French (who stopped the German advance and had to hold on their own all the western front until 1916) as incompetent and dumb who were saved by the mighty British (who did almost nothing until 1916).
Napoleon is another exemple: they spam Waterloo everywhere to make believe to the world that they defeated Napoleon's Empire (while France was already on its knees since the Russian invasion) and while most of the Allied army at Waterloo was not even British, let's not talk about English...
The 100 years war is not different, they spam Agincourt everywhere to forget that they lost the war and are totally amnesic about their own humiliating defeats (battle of Patay or battle of Castillon).
Ah yes, france, england, and *_G H E N T_*
yay more worthless internet points and some guy who replied to me
"Ghent, play me."
ai
Very well done and informative :D.
Nice work!
Don't be fooled; the video really starts at 5:16.
Europa IV huh
Adam Beck kinda has differents to the map at eu4
The Holy Roman Empire: Every Second
Portugal joined the war against France.
Portugal helped England in the war, not just because the alliance they maintained but for the help England give to Portugal when Castille invaded the portuguese territory, England sent 3000 longbowmen in Portuguese side, which brought VICTORY to Portugal, and what is curious Portugal had ~7000 troops and Castille had ~20000 troops with ~5000 Italian, Aragonese and french allies.
But this time Portugal couldn´t reverse the history just because France is even stronger then England and Portugal together " in that time " sorry for my bad english. ;b
Portugal buddies ;)
Emanuelll_rus 15 - Bless Portugal we love Portugal and admire and respect the Portuguese 💛
portugal and england have had the longest alliance in history, starting in the crusades and still going, with a brief interruption over a dispute during the scramble for africa
Love Portugal from Britain 🇬🇧
Spain helped France. We destroyed a fleet of 48 English ships, without losing any, at La Rochelle 1372. Spain then invaded southern England with three fleets, in 1377, 1380-81, and 1411, devastating the entire coastline. The Spanish fleet came up the Thames almost to London. We have to help the allies of the European Union! ;)
hoho simple yet interesting and informative.keep the good work.
that was nice for education, well done!
player of the game: Joanne D'Arc
In this war Spain helped France. In the Battle of La Rochelle 1372, the Spanish fleet sank an English fleet of 48 ships, without losing any (remember that at Trafalgar the English sank 11 Spanish ships, not 48). Then, in 1377, 1380-81 and 1411, the Spanish fleet invaded the south of England, coming up the Thames almost to London.
@@Amaglabiddiaghloughbuite Great battle. Well we've all sunk great fleets
-1589. Spain sinks 80 ships of Drake's invincible English fleet
-1571. Lepanto. 200 Turkish ships sunk by Spanish NATO in Italy
-1585. Miracle of Empel. 100 Dutch ships sunk by Spain in a single night
-1625. 62 ships of the combined English and Dutch fleet sunk and captured at Cádiz
-1741 Cartagena de Indias. 50 British Royal Navy ships destroyed
-1741-48 More than 400 British ships (military and merchant) captured in the Atlantic.
-1779-80. Capture of two British fleets of 24 and 55 ships, during the naval blockade of Spain against England.
-Some Japanese pirate fleets sunk, and fleets of 40 ships of the German Hanseatic League. Or combined fleets from Portugal and France.
We also have defeats, of course, like Trafalgar, Cabo Passaro or Cabo San Vicente.
Indeed so! Spain is the TRUE first superpower!
Reasons for France being strong
-They kicked the English out
-They Won
Reasons for England being strong
-The French never stepped foot in England
-They still held on to the Channel islands, formally part of Normandy.
Yics Hazard the only reason England is still alive is because of sea, their only strengh
Pipsy No.
Yics Hazard yes, only sea saved England in every fucking war it led
Except NO.
The UK is the superpower of Europe.
Fun fact, the Edward III's candidacy was probably stronger than that of Philipp V according to the Salic law :
Edward III (d. 1377) - Edward II (d. 1327) - Edward I (d. 1307) - Henry III (d. 1272) - John (d. 1216) - Henry II (d. 1189) - Geoffrey of Anjou (d. 1151) - Fulk V of Anjou (d. 1143) - Fulk IV of Anjou (d. 1109) - Geoffrey II of Gâtinais (d. circa 1045) - Hugo of Perche (circa 1028) - Fulcois of Perche (circa 1 000) - Gauzfred of Châteaudun (d. 989) - Gauzfred of Chartres (circa 942) - Gausbert (circa 925) - Gauzfred (circa 886) - Gauzfrid of Maine (d. 877) - Rorgo I of Maine (circa 840) - Gauzlin of Maine (circa 820) - unknow - Hervé of Mans (circa 750) - Roger of Mans (cica 710) - Hervé of Hesbayes (circa 692) - Robert (circa 677) - Erlebert (circa 639)
Erlebert is the oldest male ancestor of the capetian dynasty...
You should do the Reconquista, Every Day >:D
"in 1379, the djent appears..."
Boi that escalated quickly
6:00 What is that little red dot?
Im pretty sure it's Calais, it stayed part of England for a very long time.
King Tapyrr II What happened to it?
Nemo's Husband's wife it was captured by the french in 1558. Another hundred years after the end of the hundred years war
Britain : I hate france, we are hate each other for thousand years.
German Empire : *build some dreadnoughts
Britain : WTF, Omg france your country is so good, we are friend right? Our historical relation is very good, wanna form alliance againts German Empire?
Fantastic video
great work tigerstar
anyone else see the english pesant rebels?
I currently live in Colchester.
There is a tiny walk in an old residential area
called the John Ball Walk.
+Nanook av Süden Living on the edge of history
*Peasant
2:30
It says *1475* instead of presumably _1375_. It doesn't really matter, but i thought i'd leave a comment informing you.
0:45 also 1435 vs 1345.
amazed that war didnt just stop during the black death
LIke always awesome choice of music.
Hundred years of fighting and battles, 6'15'' instructive for me and surely long hours of studies for you ! Congratulations
Can you do growth of the Swiss Confederates from its foundation in 1291 up to present day
no mention of the famous battle of agincourt and Joan of Arc?
They're in the video...
***** i like your video's
Dovah Kinn 4:39 Joan of Arc
Dovah Kinn Jeanne d'Arc*
borisvdm yes i know thats how you say it in French but i know here better by english name
Spain : I lost my first colony
Great Britain : My first colony did a civil war to gain its independence
France : *I got invaded by my first colony*
well technically spain's first colony is still theirs
@@calibvr which one
@@aeiou9054 Canary Islands
@@calibvr Oh
I wouldn't call England France's colony, more like Normandy's. The Normans were quite different from the rest of the French, they were descended from Vikings, and the French king also wasn't very happy about losing Normandy after William became king, and from the 1070s started raiding Normandy.
Nice job on this :)
THIS IS SO COOL
All this because some Viking dude...
Uuuh , no ... It's because of English who wanted the throne of France
Mister Ronron England which was ruled by a french dynasty...
@Autzen Hallock Rollo a Viking that was given the land known as Normandy by the Frankish king with the condition that he would protect the Frankish kingdom against the raids of his own people the Vikings. So his descendant, William The Conqueror, a Norman, took the English throne and became King of England. Suddenly he had lands in both England and France, that's where the conflict begins.
Vikings don't like being told no
Mary screwed everything up when she lost us calais.
I learned I am a descendant of John Talbot, I never knew that, that's cool
As an Englishman let me explain something -
1/3rd of us have no idea what the Hundred Years War is.
1/3rd get it confused with the Thirty Year and Seven Year Wars, and don’t really care.
1/3rd have a rough idea, can name a king or two.
As an Englishman I’m telling you all that it may surprise you just how little your average Joe will know or care about this conflict. So I wouldn’t get too worked up or make such outrageous assumptions about the English.
Wonderful video as always. There's only one thing I would change. It should have been every day.