Pugachev was the original demo pilot for the Su-27M (later designated as Su-35), then other famous pilots continued his demo works. Such as Averyanov, Frolov, Vaschuk. Averyanov - who became later the Su-30MKI and now the Su-30SM demo pilot - did the demos with this No. 703 plane at Farnborough, Frolov flew with the No.711 TVC plane called Su-37 and Vaschuk followed him when it was re-fitted with the non-TVC engines called Su-35 again. Vaschuk ejected from the broken No. 711 in 2002 december. Frolov ejected from the No. 04 Su-35BM in 2009, while Averyanov ejected from the No. 01 Su-30MKI prototype in Le Bourget, 1999. Today, from the good old Su-27M/Su-35 fleet, only the No. 710 is flyable, for engine tests.
@@viperzerofsx The 703 is not flyable long time ago. The 703, the 712 and the three series aircrafts, the No 86, 87 and 88 were re-painted in 2003, to the Russian Knights paintscheme. The demo team tested all those five aircrafts, but they refused to use them due to the far different ejection seat position (30 degrees backward tilted like in the F-16), the much heavier airframe and the lot of differecies between each single planes. Since then all those five aircrafts stay in Kubinka, but they lost their flyable conditions. Between 2003 and 2015, when the group got the Su-30SM, for the main type of the Russian Knights was the Su-27 and the service was used up all common parts from the five Su-35s. Nowadays, the Russian Knights still have some flyable Su-27s, but mostly uses their eight Su-30SM and the also eight new Su-35S aircrafts. The very last old Su-35 (Su-27M or T-10M) was the 710 in Zhukovsky, but I dont know, if it is still able to flying.
OMG, Finally on youtube, I have found just the video i was looking for. I was always looking for the original Su-35, and here it is. The original Su-35 with no one but the very man who invented the world famous Pugachev's Cobra!!! I salute you sir, and so do all the countries including America and India!!!
Talk to any pilot with any combat experience (especially Chuck Yeager), skill matters more than the machine.this is why ww2 pilots in the Sabre dominated the mig during Korea with a kill ratio of 10:1. Due to a removal of dogfighting schools, the kill ratio of the F4 in Vietnam was only 1:1
At last, what a great honor for me to behold the man, the myth, the legend himself ; the father of Belkan Witchcraft , the 1 , the only, ' VICTOR PUGACHEV'!!!
The United States Air Force originally planned to order 750 ATFs, with production beginning in 1994; however, the 1990 Major Aircraft Review altered the plan to 648 aircraft beginning in 1996. The goal changed again in 1994, when it became 442 aircraft entering service in 2003 or 2004, but a 1997 Department of Defense report put the purchase at 339. In 2003, the Air Force said that the existing congressional cost cap limited the purchase to 277. By 2006,the Pentagon said it will buy 183 aircraft
The Su-37 has the newer, more powerful, NIIP NO-11M pulse-Doppler phased-array nose radar. A rearward-facing missile system and NIIP NO-12 rear-radar will give the pilot the ability to fire at enemy aircraft behind the Su-37, in addition to the front. While the Su-37 is the first Russian aircraft to feature thrust vector control comparable to that of the American F-22, it may not be the last.
I have seen this airplanes and theirs kulbit manoeuvres. They are so terrifics. Almost I had a heart attack when I had seen the amazing kulbit manoeuvres. Really, Mother Land Russia is the best about super airplanes. Rússkie Vítiazi. Berkuti. Spetsnaz. Congratulations to all russian pilots from Venezuela.
Here is a piece I have just copied about the all singing, dancing supposedly brilliant F22--- This reclined seating arrangement was first used in the F-16 Fighting Falcon but was determined to be of little value. However, it was replicated in the F-22A Raptor.
@Maraudershark1 Yak 38 and Sea Harier are first serial aircraftst that use Thrust vectoring, if you dont belive, you should both read what is in fact thrust vectoring, its not just about moving nozzles. First plane ever using thrust vectoring was Yak 36, his first flight was in 1962... And that about F15 i wont even comment.
In fact, the original Su 35 didn't have any thrust vectoring. Only the Su 37, which was developed from it, had. Don't mix it up with the current Su-35 though. The current one posesses all-axis thrust-vectoring, but lacks canards.
No, Pugacheve got angle 110 in 1988-89. There was not thrust vectoring anywhere. This was result of scientific research in Centeral Aero and Hidro Dinamic Institute in Zukovsky (near Moscow) and also design buro and other companies
@REPOMAN24722 it has a bit more thrust, better radar and some external differences like larger vertical stabilizer and canards 4 better maneuverability.
I do not know but I want to have one. The Sukhoi is the most beautiful figther that I have seen. Congratulations to SUKHOI and MIG and all russian pilots.
The AK was voted best assault rifle ever by the Military Channel. 'Nuff said. Stoner's AR15 design was 2nd. Only snipers engage those long range targets. I hated the M16 when I used it. It jammed a lot, and that cost me a target while qualifying. And the 5.56 doesn't knock a target on it's ass like a 7.62. It actually goes str8 through people often with that velocity. Rangers in somalia complained about it. People would get shot and keep coming, only stopping when they lost enough blood.
Whhether or not its the best or w/e you can debate as much as you want. You can't deny the AK is the single most widely used gun on earth or the fact that it's been in every conflict since its introduction.
@Maraudershark1 I suppose that you know where and what is SOKO Mostar...there i worked on Super Galeb G4 and later improvement (that was never finished). Mostly computer simulations (calculations). But now is bad time for our aircraft industry so i work where they are paying me..romania, israel, italy...
Its tried & tested & has been doing it for 10 years+ The nearest NATO has to it is the F22 Raptor which is still learning how not to fall out of the sky!
the ak-74 is a smg so you cnt really compare an assault rifle to a smg. but we are testing new weapons that have the stopping power of the AK-47 and the accuracy of the M-16 or M-4
This is the original su-35 also called the su-27m it became the basis for the SU-37 and a lot of the tech in it was used on later flankers but it’s different from the modern su-35.
@xnizarx Su-27 in my humble opinion is the most aerodynamically-perfected aircraft in the world once equipped with canards. I'd love to see a version of F-22 without thrust vectoring try to have same pitch, roll and turn rates as the flanker. It wouldn't. Its not really a fair comparo though: they are generations apart. I can't wait to see what PAK-FA looks like. I imagine FSW, canards, TVC, slightly flattened and widened nose, a wide area for internal missile carriage.
Multy role?? I dont think so-On Sept. 17, 2002 Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. John P. Jumper announced a change in the designation of the F-22 Raptor to F/A-22 at the 2002 Air Force Association National Convention. The change is meant to more accurately reflect the aircraft's multimission roles and capabilities in contemporary strategic environments. However, the designation reverted to F-22 in December 2005 They will have to waste billions more on another plane to sort the attack mode
Thats funny-the SU 37 has full 3D TVC & just for kicks it also has rear facing radar & missiles Even the SU 27 pilots had helmet mounted sights linked to a laser designator in a dome in front of the cockpit for look down shoot down Dont underestimate the Russian missile capabilities
I think this is Su-37 not 35. The 35 never had canards unless they ended up doing away with them after this model? But it has all the characteristics of the naval Su-35 and the original mustard yellow and dark green camo with the side stick that Pugachev flew the original cobra maneuvers in it.
Sukhoi 35 is the real sky killer fighter never build until now. Thanks to all russian Sukhoi team because all of you are the champions. SUKHOI 47 BERKUT.
About long arm - F-35 needs defence of F-22, but F-22 is bad dogfiter, it can work only like long arm (AAM) carrier. I think it is very good against very old air defence, like in Iraq.
@Maraudershark1 i was laughing about that video. You are trying to refer to XV-4 Hummingbird - nice try. First flight 1962 all experimental models destroyed in test takeoff... I am not child friend...i work as software developer, software that is used in aircrafts, helicopters, UAVs (beside other kinds of software used in industry, robotic work lines etc)....i need to know alot about aeronautic and electronic...
@Maraudershark1 i am not from England, i have right to suck in grammar. Beside English i use Russian, French and Italian. I worked in SOKO and VTI and later SDPR. Now wroking honorar as IT (Aermacchi, Utva, Elbit, Rafale, VTI...even some private romanian company). And i am far older then "junior". XVRO? Never heard in my life. Yeah, everyone are fighter pilots, if we judge on youtube USA has between 12-16.000 F22 pilots....
I totally agree that the F-22 is the most dominant aircraft in the world, but check out the YF-23, it was far superior to the F22, but it lost the contract due to its cost.
Sorry, i think the time to forget about stealth is came. Cobra at 110 angle not for F22. Conception of long arm is not new, but not for fighter. Remember long arm of Moscow :). But it is not always work.
@Maraudershark1 Dont worry man...i know that many ppl pretend that they are something that they are not in fact... Google Super Galeb G4 once..first aircraft i worked on ;) Good luck.
Why has the USA spent more than most countries GDP to try & copy the SU 37?? Yep the cobra is an airshow stunt but turning inside the arc of the opposition is the key, try turning fast with all that energy (which the SU 37 has more than enough of ) When it displayed at Farnborough in 1996 which I was at everyone including the English & American display pilots were stunned & when offered to a mock dogfight declined Checkout the SU 37 at Wikipedia but look at the external links
@Maraudershark1 i am far older than you think i am, that was what i wanted to say. Fired? Oh no, i quit in SOKO coz of war in 1991, factory was almost destroyed, then i worked in Belgrade in VTI and Utva, but they are now building only L.trainers. And i am pure IT engineer i am not aeronatuical engineer. My job is to develop software and implement it in finished combat systems thats why i need to cooperate with mechanical engineers. And i am not trying to impress you, i just talk with you :).
that's the ak-74u you're thinking of. as for the reaosn the ak-47 was so inaccurate it's because it bends as it fires. The m4 and m-16 dont have rounds that are that great. the 6.8mm grendel pretty much represents the best of both worlds, and it's a hell of a lot better than those pathetic excuses for rifle rounds that are the 5.45mm and the 5.56. why we still use those things, or why we even bothered to, I can hardly fathom.
@thatoneguy12ize ...need to research more before post...Su27M = T10M = early Su35 = Su37...mabye this can help U a little 3w.milavia.net/aircraft/su-35_su-27m/su-35_su-27m.htm
Izmash Weapons Factory - Izhevsk, Russia Izmash Weapons Factory - Izhevsk, Russia Izmash Weapons Factory - Izhevsk, Russia LOOK TO THE NIKONOV AN94 1SHOT 2BULET
this is one bad ass fighter.....it would take you out before you knew what hit you. russian design's are far more superior and ahead of there time. US design's have only recently implimented the vectoring exhaust nozzles. it does'nt mean there no good. i just think russian planes are in a class by them selfs
The F-22 is better. But only just. It's the only plane that on paper can actually out perform the SU-35. Bit like comparinf "Empire Strikes Back" to "Return of the Jedi".
CAUSE ITS AMERICANNNN, IT HAS TO BE BETTER. ITS THE MOST RATIONAL REASON THERE CAN BE. AMERICANS ARE ALSO NOT OVERWEIGHT AS THEY NEVER GO TO MCDONALDS. Hence the sarcasm, herb
look at the real batl cobra(cobra MIG-29 ovt ) whith HUGE angl and the OTHER super mobiliti manuvres nothing koms klous more 5-6 sistem kontrol and atak at new mig 35 good lak
F-35 is: slow, low range, not stealth enough as radar of Su-30MKI is known to track it. single engine, can't fly very high or manuever due to high wing loading, low ordnance. Its a pure strike plane. Can;t call it fighter. Can't just survive on crazy avionics. low RCS helps a little to reduce detection range but these days combat is controlled by AEWaC that would detect F-35 beyond any missile range. Its far from invincible. and the SA10 missile is known to track and kill AA missiles F-35? Gone.
the best of oll aka47 from tula i havnot any statistik about how much amer and oder soldiers died bekors wepen just stop to work right at the batl field but i sher alot but us people musnt now about this;)))))isnt it ?????$))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
They've had better agility that is! American avionics have always been better! A very delicate balance to say the least! The problem that Russia has is the fact that they can't afford to have their pilots fly as much as their American counterparts. And the US has been shooting down Russian made fighters in the recent series of wars lately!...
Pugachev was the original demo pilot for the Su-27M (later designated as Su-35), then other famous pilots continued his demo works. Such as Averyanov, Frolov, Vaschuk. Averyanov - who became later the Su-30MKI and now the Su-30SM demo pilot - did the demos with this No. 703 plane at Farnborough, Frolov flew with the No.711 TVC plane called Su-37 and Vaschuk followed him when it was re-fitted with the non-TVC engines called Su-35 again. Vaschuk ejected from the broken No. 711 in 2002 december. Frolov ejected from the No. 04 Su-35BM in 2009, while Averyanov ejected from the No. 01 Su-30MKI prototype in Le Bourget, 1999. Today, from the good old Su-27M/Su-35 fleet, only the No. 710 is flyable, for engine tests.
I’m very happy one is still air worthy, I wish 703 was still flyable she was my favorite.
@@viperzerofsx The 703 is not flyable long time ago. The 703, the 712 and the three series aircrafts, the No 86, 87 and 88 were re-painted in 2003, to the Russian Knights paintscheme. The demo team tested all those five aircrafts, but they refused to use them due to the far different ejection seat position (30 degrees backward tilted like in the F-16), the much heavier airframe and the lot of differecies between each single planes. Since then all those five aircrafts stay in Kubinka, but they lost their flyable conditions. Between 2003 and 2015, when the group got the Su-30SM, for the main type of the Russian Knights was the Su-27 and the service was used up all common parts from the five Su-35s. Nowadays, the Russian Knights still have some flyable Su-27s, but mostly uses their eight Su-30SM and the also eight new Su-35S aircrafts. The very last old Su-35 (Su-27M or T-10M) was the 710 in Zhukovsky, but I dont know, if it is still able to flying.
OMG, Finally on youtube, I have found just the video i was looking for. I was always looking for the original Su-35, and here it is. The original Su-35 with no one but the very man who invented the world famous Pugachev's Cobra!!! I salute you sir, and so do all the countries including America and India!!!
I share with you the immense admiration I feel for this Russian aviation legend🇷🇺😎👍🏻
Talk to any pilot with any combat experience (especially Chuck Yeager), skill matters more than the machine.this is why ww2 pilots in the Sabre dominated the mig during Korea with a kill ratio of 10:1. Due to a removal of dogfighting schools, the kill ratio of the F4 in Vietnam was only 1:1
Where can I find info about that?
At last, what a great honor for me to behold the man, the myth, the legend himself ; the father of Belkan Witchcraft , the 1 , the only, ' VICTOR PUGACHEV'!!!
Su-35 is truly a supermanuverable aircraft. Amazing!
i love their thrust vectoring
whats the diff between the Su 35 and the Su 30 MKI , doesnt that have thrust vectoring and movable canards?
The United States Air Force originally planned to order 750 ATFs, with production beginning in 1994; however, the 1990 Major Aircraft Review altered the plan to 648 aircraft beginning in 1996. The goal changed again in 1994, when it became 442 aircraft entering service in 2003 or 2004, but a 1997 Department of Defense report put the purchase at 339. In 2003, the Air Force said that the existing congressional cost cap limited the purchase to 277. By 2006,the Pentagon said it will buy 183 aircraft
is it a SU-35? why this plane has spoilers behind pilot cabin?
The Su-37 has the newer, more powerful, NIIP NO-11M pulse-Doppler phased-array nose radar. A rearward-facing missile system and NIIP NO-12 rear-radar will give the pilot the ability to fire at enemy aircraft behind the Su-37, in addition to the front. While the Su-37 is the first Russian aircraft to feature thrust vector control comparable to that of the American F-22, it may not be the last.
Beautiful plane...no doubt
I have seen this airplanes and theirs kulbit manoeuvres. They are so terrifics. Almost I had a heart attack when I had seen the amazing kulbit manoeuvres. Really, Mother Land Russia is the best about super airplanes. Rússkie Vítiazi. Berkuti. Spetsnaz. Congratulations to all russian pilots from Venezuela.
Here is a piece I have just copied about the all singing, dancing supposedly brilliant F22---
This reclined seating arrangement was first used in the F-16 Fighting Falcon but was determined to be of little value. However, it was replicated in the F-22A Raptor.
@ILTUSU I'm sorry....actually it was the Su-30, that had canards....not the su-35.
@Maraudershark1 Yak 38 and Sea Harier are first serial aircraftst that use Thrust vectoring, if you dont belive, you should both read what is in fact thrust vectoring, its not just about moving nozzles. First plane ever using thrust vectoring was Yak 36, his first flight was in 1962... And that about F15 i wont even comment.
In fact, the original Su 35 didn't have any thrust vectoring. Only the Su 37, which was developed from it, had.
Don't mix it up with the current Su-35 though. The current one posesses all-axis thrust-vectoring, but lacks canards.
what i meant was
it's an su 35, an SU 27 has no deltawings in front ... sorry for the confusion
YES, YES, YES, OF COURSE, YOU ARE ALL RIGHT ABOUT IT . PUGACHEV IS MY REAL HERO.
No, Pugacheve got angle 110 in 1988-89. There was not thrust vectoring anywhere.
This was result of scientific research in Centeral Aero and Hidro Dinamic Institute in Zukovsky (near Moscow) and also design buro and other companies
At 0:22 he grabs the exhaust nozzle and gets soot on his hand. He looks like he's thinking "Why the fuck did I just do that"!
and at last a super vid look from start to and
mopst inkredebl i founnd realy interesting
Wow!!! It's dancing!!!
@REPOMAN24722 it has a bit more thrust, better radar and some external differences like larger vertical stabilizer and canards 4 better maneuverability.
I do not know but I want to have one. The Sukhoi is the most beautiful figther that I have seen. Congratulations to SUKHOI and MIG and all russian pilots.
The AK was voted best assault rifle ever by the Military Channel. 'Nuff said. Stoner's AR15 design was 2nd. Only snipers engage those long range targets. I hated the M16 when I used it. It jammed a lot, and that cost me a target while qualifying. And the 5.56 doesn't knock a target on it's ass like a 7.62. It actually goes str8 through people often with that velocity. Rangers in somalia complained about it. People would get shot and keep coming, only stopping when they lost enough blood.
Whhether or not its the best or w/e you can debate as much as you want. You can't deny the AK is the single most widely used gun on earth or the fact that it's been in every conflict since its introduction.
The 3rd super flanker's proto with Cannard
Su-27M Bort 703 🤙
@Maraudershark1 I suppose that you know where and what is SOKO Mostar...there i worked on Super Galeb G4 and later improvement (that was never finished). Mostly computer simulations (calculations). But now is bad time for our aircraft industry so i work where they are paying me..romania, israel, italy...
For sure in aerodynamic domain.
Wonderfull fighter!!!!!
Who invented gyro?
Its tried & tested & has been doing it for 10 years+ The nearest NATO has to it is the F22 Raptor which is still learning how not to fall out of the sky!
who knows or has any idea on pakfa's shape?
the ak-74 is a smg so you cnt really compare an assault rifle to a smg. but we are testing new weapons that have the stopping power of the AK-47 and the accuracy of the M-16 or M-4
Just the best fighter planes in the world!
if i'm not wrong it's a su-33, bcoz it has canards on both the sides while su 27 and su 35 do not have ..
This is the original su-35 also called the su-27m it became the basis for the SU-37 and a lot of the tech in it was used on later flankers but it’s different from the modern su-35.
@@brianbrady9187 thank you
@xnizarx
LOL, a B-2 would never be in a dogfight, it's a bomber.
@xnizarx Su-27 in my humble opinion is the most aerodynamically-perfected aircraft in the world once equipped with canards. I'd love to see a version of F-22 without thrust vectoring try to have same pitch, roll and turn rates as the flanker. It wouldn't. Its not really a fair comparo though: they are generations apart. I can't wait to see what PAK-FA looks like. I imagine FSW, canards, TVC, slightly flattened and widened nose, a wide area for internal missile carriage.
Multy role?? I dont think so-On Sept. 17, 2002 Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. John P. Jumper announced a change in the designation of the F-22 Raptor to F/A-22 at the 2002 Air Force Association National Convention. The change is meant to more accurately reflect the aircraft's multimission roles and capabilities in contemporary strategic environments. However, the designation reverted to F-22 in December 2005 They will have to waste billions more on another plane to sort the attack mode
@mauricioalfredo83 su 27 doesnt have canards
Thats funny-the SU 37 has full 3D TVC & just for kicks it also has rear facing radar & missiles Even the SU 27 pilots had helmet mounted sights linked to a laser designator in a dome in front of the cockpit for look down shoot down Dont underestimate the Russian missile capabilities
wy do you think so????
I think this is Su-37 not 35. The 35 never had canards unless they ended up doing away with them after this model? But it has all the characteristics of the naval Su-35 and the original mustard yellow and dark green camo with the side stick that Pugachev flew the original cobra maneuvers in it.
This is the SU-27M which used to be called the SU-35 before the more modern jet. They are only distantly related.
DEAM NOW I REALIZE...thats not Su35....I thought it was Su37:)....but actually its Su27M T10M-4 "703"
Yes, but is a SUKHOI. Can you see the canards in my avatar ?
Sukhoi 35 is the real sky killer fighter never build until now. Thanks to all russian Sukhoi team because all of you are the champions. SUKHOI 47 BERKUT.
FlightFan, real nice video! By TovarishSamsonShekovich.
yes its
About long arm - F-35 needs defence of F-22, but F-22 is bad dogfiter, it can work only like long arm (AAM) carrier. I think it is very good against very old air defence, like in Iraq.
it is a 35, you can tell easily by the cannards right behind cockpit
The SUKHOIS fighters are the best and nobody dudes about that.
Stealth capability is not a way to win a battle ;) remember that !
@Maraudershark1 i was laughing about that video. You are trying to refer to XV-4 Hummingbird - nice try. First flight 1962 all experimental models destroyed in test takeoff... I am not child friend...i work as software developer, software that is used in aircrafts, helicopters, UAVs (beside other kinds of software used in industry, robotic work lines etc)....i need to know alot about aeronautic and electronic...
2:32 Cobra maneuver
@Maraudershark1 i am not from England, i have right to suck in grammar. Beside English i use Russian, French and Italian. I worked in SOKO and VTI and later SDPR. Now wroking honorar as IT (Aermacchi, Utva, Elbit, Rafale, VTI...even some private romanian company). And i am far older then "junior". XVRO? Never heard in my life. Yeah, everyone are fighter pilots, if we judge on youtube USA has between 12-16.000 F22 pilots....
KOMSOMOLSK ON AMUR AIRCRAFT.
I totally agree that the F-22 is the most dominant aircraft in the world, but check out the YF-23, it was far superior to the F22, but it lost the contract due to its cost.
Sorry, i think the time to forget about stealth is came. Cobra at 110 angle not for F22. Conception of long arm is not new, but not for fighter. Remember long arm of Moscow :). But it is not always work.
the fact that russias low wages on military talents mean shortage of great minds, surely dont expect for greater designs as well.
ofcours its
@Maraudershark1 Dont worry man...i know that many ppl pretend that they are something that they are not in fact... Google Super Galeb G4 once..first aircraft i worked on ;) Good luck.
LOL its better in terms of?
@mauricioalfredo83 oh, i feel dumb know sorry,thanks.
this is a su30mkk
95 degris maksimum angl nose up in su at kobra
they are caled kanar-and SU-35 have them
...have u ever heard of an f22???
su 35, 27 has no deltawings in front
Could be A Su-33 or a SU-27 MK
Why has the USA spent more than most countries GDP to try & copy the SU 37?? Yep the cobra is an airshow stunt but turning inside the arc of the opposition is the key, try turning fast with all that energy (which the SU 37 has more than enough of ) When it displayed at Farnborough in 1996 which I was at everyone including the English & American display pilots were stunned & when offered to a mock dogfight declined Checkout the SU 37 at Wikipedia but look at the external links
This is not S 35.
History of AK 47
you must to see this spesialy at the and very very interesting
это су30
@Maraudershark1 i am far older than you think i am, that was what i wanted to say. Fired? Oh no, i quit in SOKO coz of war in 1991, factory was almost destroyed, then i worked in Belgrade in VTI and Utva, but they are now building only L.trainers. And i am pure IT engineer i am not aeronatuical engineer. My job is to develop software and implement it in finished combat systems thats why i need to cooperate with mechanical engineers. And i am not trying to impress you, i just talk with you :).
3 words stick in my mind (Apart from you talk crap!) from my last post--congressional cost cap
nothing about 187 is enough
RUSSIAN PLANES ARE BUILDING WITH HEART ... THE BEST IN THE WORLD ;)
that's the ak-74u you're thinking of. as for the reaosn the ak-47 was so inaccurate it's because it bends as it fires. The m4 and m-16 dont have rounds that are that great. the 6.8mm grendel pretty much represents the best of both worlds, and it's a hell of a lot better than those pathetic excuses for rifle rounds that are the 5.45mm and the 5.56. why we still use those things, or why we even bothered to, I can hardly fathom.
Stealth technology nowadays is nothing
@thatoneguy12ize ...need to research more before post...Su27M = T10M = early Su35 = Su37...mabye this can help U a little 3w.milavia.net/aircraft/su-35_su-27m/su-35_su-27m.htm
Many people knows russian planes are the best in all world. And, who does not want the sukhoi. The father of airplanes sukhoi was PAVEL SUKHOI.
and they aren't deltawings. they are canards
Me Shooting an AKSU
Izmash Weapons Factory - Izhevsk, Russia
Izmash Weapons Factory - Izhevsk, Russia
Izmash Weapons Factory - Izhevsk, Russia
LOOK TO THE NIKONOV AN94 1SHOT 2BULET
this is one bad ass fighter.....it would take you out before you knew what hit you. russian design's are far more superior and ahead of there time. US design's have only recently implimented the vectoring exhaust nozzles. it does'nt mean there no good. i just think russian planes are in a class by them selfs
You probably also think that Americans pioneered stealth technology. Please. Your comments illustrate enough about you!
that fighter fucks f-35
game
english subs plz
The F-22 is better. But only just.
It's the only plane that on paper can actually out perform the SU-35.
Bit like comparinf "Empire Strikes Back" to "Return of the Jedi".
CAUSE ITS AMERICANNNN, IT HAS TO BE BETTER. ITS THE MOST RATIONAL REASON THERE CAN BE. AMERICANS ARE ALSO NOT OVERWEIGHT AS THEY NEVER GO TO MCDONALDS. Hence the sarcasm, herb
look at the real batl cobra(cobra MIG-29 ovt )
whith HUGE angl and the OTHER super mobiliti
manuvres nothing koms klous more 5-6 sistem kontrol and atak at new mig 35 good lak
F-35 is: slow, low range, not stealth enough as radar of Su-30MKI is known to track it. single engine, can't fly very high or manuever due to high wing loading, low ordnance. Its a pure strike plane. Can;t call it fighter. Can't just survive on crazy avionics. low RCS helps a little to reduce detection range but these days combat is controlled by AEWaC that would detect F-35 beyond any missile range. Its far from invincible. and the SA10 missile is known to track and kill AA missiles F-35? Gone.
That definitely not su35. Su35 doesn't have any canards.
This is the Su-27m which was called the Su-35 in the 90s and early 2000s.
POCCNR.
РОССИЯ!
I want to bay a suhkoi, I have the money but RUSSIA does not want sell one.
Lol you don't have shit man
America is fighting 2 wars at present & the F 22 has flown how many missions??? ZERO
the best of oll aka47 from tula
i havnot any statistik about how much amer and oder soldiers died bekors wepen just stop to work right at the batl field but i sher
alot but us people musnt now about this;)))))isnt it ?????$))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
They've had better agility that is! American avionics have always been better! A very delicate balance to say the least! The problem that Russia has is the fact that they can't afford to have their pilots fly as much as their American counterparts. And the US has been shooting down Russian made fighters in the recent series of wars lately!...
Russia, I love you so much. Viva Vladimir Putin. He was a Sukhoi pilot. How I can to buy a Tupolev T-160 White Shan ?
bs,AK-47 is the best rifle of 20th and 21st centery.