LOL Iger destroyed Disney and turned it into a soulless money making machine. Pretty much he did what ever it took to make money and cheapened the Disney brand...leaving behind creativity and high standards. It was Michael Eisner, the one before Iger, who put art, creativity, and high standards into Disney. All of the junk live action remake is trying to make a cheap buck from Disney's hey day (under Micheal Eisner). Please look into the history please. Nothing Disney done after Iger's takeover has been creative, celebrating the arts, or have high standards. All of the cheap CGI's marvel crap is in poor quality including the soundtrack.
@@beycarter1860 Nope. Most of the world disagree, hence Disney's value skyrocketed; they bought Marvel and Lucasfilm for 4 billion each and they're now worth 70 and 80 billion respectively. Quality? as of this year, Disney owns 9 of the top 10 and 15 of the top 20 highest grossing films of all time and 8 of the top 10 animation; they just claimed the most nominations and wins at the Oscars I'd say that's enough to prove their quality is above all.
Hahaha! Exactly, finally a commentator that actually knows the history of Disney. Iger is the worse CEO if Disney wants to focus on quality, arts, and creativity. Iger destroyed and cheapen the Disney brand. I will never pay to visit the park until they get rid of this guy.
What are you talking about? Marvel during his time is amazing! Have you seen the last 5 years of marvel movies or are you in a box ? All the avengers movies were amazing ! All the individual characters movies are good. The ones that were recently released and not under his leadership were horrible.
@@ahayden768 It doesn't matter. Disney never needed Marvel in the first place. It was nothing but an excuse for Iger to make even more money and to produce less and less new and original content of Disney's own. 🤷♀
@@1992disney As a big fan of Marvel and Disney, I can speak as a Marvel fan in being glad that Disney got them when they did. Avengers Endgame was a theatre experience I'll remember for a long time. I take it from your username you're an Aladdin/Renaissance fan. Those first five years from 89-94 were magical weren't they? The acquisition of Marvel allowed Disney to expand their reach and diversify their offerings, so I can see why they did it from a business perspective. And while it's also true that Disney has put a significant focus on the Marvel properties since the acquisition, they have continued to produce plenty of new/original content as well. Did you enjoy Raya and the Last Dragon or Encanto? I'm excited for Wish coming out this year as well.
@@1992disney I do! So are you a Marvel fan or a Disney fan? If you're a Disney fan as I would assume by you're name, why do you believe that Disney has wrecked Marvel? I guess I might understand your point more if you were coming at this as a Marvel fan from before Disney acquired them.
Bob Iger is a legend. His incredible business acumen and deep-seated appreciation for creatives redefine what it means to be an effective business executive. He has made some difficult and controversial decisions since returning to Disney, but I'm elated to see him return.
LOL Iger destroyed Disney and turned it into a soulless money making machine. Pretty much he did what ever it took to make money and cheapened the Disney brand...leaving behind creativity and high standards. It was Michael Eisner, the one before Iger, who put art, creativity, and high standards into Disney. All of the junk live action remake is trying to make a cheap buck from Disney's hey day (under Micheal Eisner). Please look into the history please. Nothing Disney done after Iger's takeover has been creative, celebrating the arts, or have high standards. All of the cheap CGI's marvel crap is in poor quality including the soundtrack.
@@HolyRamanRajya i'm a T-800. Cyberdyne Systems Model 101. cybernetic organism. living tissue over a metal endoskeleton. But sarcasm aside, what are your specific thoughts on the discussion ?
@@Whoaly His is the era that objectifies and commodifies minority groups for money and partakes in rainbow captalsm. We no longer have Buffy or Xena, instead the formula is used to replace successful whitemen content which got successful not because coincidental whitemen but because they were good. I have to use the whitemen term even though I am not one. Nothing wrong with affirmative action, it understandably reduces quality a bit but its the just thing to do and ideally it should be set at the government level. Disney however picks the minority unskilled kids of their privileged families to star in their content and the quality drops off a cliff. All their content nowadays have this favoritism policy either on the protagonist or important supporting characters. Ms Marvel and Black Panther could have been so good without the favoritism but nah. Bob Iger might not be the first to do this twisted reservation but he has certainly made it successful.
LOL he definitely is amazing at making a cheap buck. He literally cheapened Disney's brand after his take over from Micheal Eisner. If you do some research on Eisner, you will realize that under Iger, all Disney did was tried to capitalized on what Micheal Eisner did by doing the live remake. All of the remake so far is in poor quality with horrible CGI. I will give you that, that Iger is a business man and would do what ever it takes to make more money and grow Disney without focusing on the arts, quality, and being creative.
@@beycarter1860 Also with Eisner he gave us the 90s Disney resurgence. But in the 00s things went south and basically went greedy and fire Roy E. Disney without even telling him. AT least he came back to fix up what Chapek did terribly.
@@rawyld Exactly! I'm sure we're all grateful for the 90s renaissance but Eisner lost his footing towards the end of his run there. Home on the Range anyone ? I'm glad we have someone to steady the ship for the 100th anniversary.
LOL Iger destroyed Disney and turned it into a soulless money making machine. Pretty much he did what ever it took to make money and cheapened the Disney brand...leaving behind creativity and high standards. It was Michael Eisner, the one before Iger, who put art, creativity, and high standards into Disney. All of the junk live action remake is trying to make a cheap buck from Disney's hey day (under Micheal Eisner). Please look into the history please. Nothing Disney done after Iger's takeover has been creative, celebrating the arts, or have high standards. All of the cheap CGI's marvel crap is in poor quality including the soundtrack.
@@beycarter1860 Michael Eisner had his time in the renaissance for sure but unfortunately, he really couldn't do it himself without a Frank Wells. Eisner almost killed Disney's future with Pixar with his feud with Steve Jobs. Speaking of "leaving behind creativity and high standards" and "trying to make a cheap buck from Disney's hey day", who was it that commissioned cheap direct to vhs sequels to popular Disney animated films because they couldn't think of anything else in the first place? Return of Jafar anybody? Parks also received less investment after the Euro Disney failure. Iger was responsible for the revival era of the Disney Animated Canon, which personally, brought me back into the fold as a lapse Disney fan. I can understand if you're not a Marvel or Star Wars fan, but you're telling me Up, Coco, Frozen, Zootopia, Inside Out, Moana, never struck a cord with you ? That they were made by a soulless money making machine with no appreciation for art, creativity or high standards? These films are as good if not better than the Renaissance/Pixar Golden Age films. To be fair, I don't actually dislike Eisner, (the only Disney CEO I would probably actively dislike is Chapek), but I think your statement is unfair. So Please, look into the history please.
@@Whoaly Well, Up, Coco, Pixar was mainly part of the Pixar Productions which Steve Jobs built. Yes, Bob Iger's best move business wise is buying Pixar. However, instead of building up the original company, he has to acquire companies. Pixar made a bunch of flops under Iger including all of the Toy Story spin offs. Also, we don't really want to mention the biggest box office (not just Disney but the box office) flop in history loosing the studio nearly 200 million dollars under Iger in 2022 called Strange World. Have you heard of it? I don't think so because NOBODY saw it LOL! You only named a few movies. There is a bunch of flops compared to hits under Iger that it would take too long to list here. The movies you listed...only some can be entertaining like any basic formulaic box office movie. However, like I said if you look into it and understand how they create the look, score/music, etc. during the Disney Renaissance days...there was a lot of art, talent, theater, and quality built it. Nice chatting with you.
@@beycarter1860 It's nice to chat with someone familiar with Disney history despite our opposing opinions. I'm sure we could go back and forth regarding renaissance vs revival era. By Toy Story spinoffs, surely you don't mean the sequels? Toy Story 3 is a masterpiece! While 4 may not as been as good, and certainly has some issues, I can't say I didn't leave the theatre with a smile and a bit teary eyed. Call me a sucker I guess. If you mean the short films, well I don't mind those at all, and am in fact a fan of the short films before main feature (though I can understand why some would be annoyed with it). I think I have heard of Strange World.. wasn't that the last film under Bob Chapek that was sent out to die with no marketing budget? I may have only named a few films, but I could name some more. How many can you name under Eisner besides The Little Mermaid, The Lion King, Beauty and the Beast and Aladdin? Other films did well, but were certainly a decline from the golden five years between 89 and 94. While Hercules, Mulan and even Tarzan were pretty good, they never reached the same heights as those first 5 years. Pocahontas? I like the songs. Hunchback of Notre Dame? I think it may have been my least watched Renaissance VHS. It may be cheating to name Pixar films during this time if we're strictly talking Eisner vs Iger,. But Pixar is, as you mentioned, one of Iger's best business moves. That Pixar influence seeped into the Disney Studio animated films too. Princess and the Frog, Tangled, Wreck-It-Ralph, Big Hero 6, Frozen, Zootopia, Moana, Ralph Breaks the Internet, Frozen II, Raya and the Last Dragon, Encanto. Of course I'm speaking mostly on the animated side here. But if we want to go live action head to head Eisner vs Iger, we could do that as well. Anyways, at the end of the day, Disney is an entertainment company. They make films among other things. Films are super subjective. We could argue about box office, creativity, or pop culture impact of renaissance or revival films. I can't pretend to understand all the intricacies that goes into an animated production, or the amount of creativity that must go into the writing, animation or musical writing process. So I totally respect your opinion, perhaps you have an edge on me there. You're right, Iger made some flops. John Carter anyone? But I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree as to whom made the most positive impact. Like I mentioned before, I don't hate Eisner. How could I hate the guy who was responsible for some of the best memories of my childhood? I just don't see the flaws you see in Bob Iger though. Anyways, take care fellow Renaissance fan.
Funny how he can describe himself how he will/is destroying the most beloved company in the world. Really and pure Evil man. Fun fact = Time put HItler on his covers more then 10 times, and Mussolini twice. Now it's Iger's turn, tell you all you need to know.
I don't quite understand your grammar, perhaps you could rephrase it? Are you saying he's describing how he "destroyed" the company? Could you give some examples? He has no more "destroyed" the most beloved company in the world than his other two predecessors, Bob Chapek or Michael Eisner. Compared to their respective runs, I think most would agree he's been equal or greater in his contributions to the company. Though I could understand if one had more fondness for Eisner's early years certainly. By the logic of your fun fact, anyone who has ever been on a Time magazine cover is an evil man? That doesn't seem to quite make sense.
@@Whoaly Gender swapping, Race swapping, Using IP but telling a different story, loosing 62 billions dollar's to the cie value. If you need more, you're simply not honest in your said "desire" to understand. Your Time magazine argument is so stupid I burse in laughter, thx for that needed a laugh.
#FireBobIger!!!
The face of out of touch incompetence mixed with pure evil!
This guy pls the reason the company fails 😂😂😂😂
Hey Bob, GFY
Bob is a pedophile.
Hey TIME, any new 30 under 30 fraudsters for your magazine cover?
You're doing a great job, Mr. Iger; we're grateful for your service!
LOL Iger destroyed Disney and turned it into a soulless money making machine. Pretty much he did what ever it took to make money and cheapened the Disney brand...leaving behind creativity and high standards. It was Michael Eisner, the one before Iger, who put art, creativity, and high standards into Disney. All of the junk live action remake is trying to make a cheap buck from Disney's hey day (under Micheal Eisner). Please look into the history please. Nothing Disney done after Iger's takeover has been creative, celebrating the arts, or have high standards. All of the cheap CGI's marvel crap is in poor quality including the soundtrack.
@@beycarter1860 Thank you for your opinion, as your voice matters also. May your day be filled with joy, Love! ☀️🌱🌻
@@josefinahatton 🥰😘
@@beycarter1860 Nope. Most of the world disagree, hence Disney's value skyrocketed; they bought Marvel and Lucasfilm for 4 billion each and they're now worth 70 and 80 billion respectively. Quality? as of this year, Disney owns 9 of the top 10 and 15 of the top 20 highest grossing films of all time and 8 of the top 10 animation; they just claimed the most nominations and wins at the Oscars I'd say that's enough to prove their quality is above all.
toxic positivity bot
Bob Iger drinks Bud Light...
You gotta love the irony of bringing back the guy who initiated all the problems to 'fix' them.
Hahaha! Exactly, finally a commentator that actually knows the history of Disney. Iger is the worse CEO if Disney wants to focus on quality, arts, and creativity. Iger destroyed and cheapen the Disney brand. I will never pay to visit the park until they get rid of this guy.
The guy who wrecked Disney?
Exactly. Iger cheapen the Disney brand just to make a buck.
Funny how he can describe himself how he will/is destroying the most beloved company in the world. Really and pure Evil man
This guy is the Oswald to Mickey
Yep after Michael Eisner.
The guy who wrecked Marvel and Fox?
What are you talking about? Marvel during his time is amazing! Have you seen the last 5 years of marvel movies or are you in a box ? All the avengers movies were amazing ! All the individual characters movies are good. The ones that were recently released and not under his leadership were horrible.
@@ahayden768 It doesn't matter. Disney never needed Marvel in the first place. It was nothing but an excuse for Iger to make even more money and to produce less and less new and original content of Disney's own. 🤷♀
@@1992disney As a big fan of Marvel and Disney, I can speak as a Marvel fan in being glad that Disney got them when they did. Avengers Endgame was a theatre experience I'll remember for a long time. I take it from your username you're an Aladdin/Renaissance fan. Those first five years from 89-94 were magical weren't they? The acquisition of Marvel allowed Disney to expand their reach and diversify their offerings, so I can see why they did it from a business perspective. And while it's also true that Disney has put a significant focus on the Marvel properties since the acquisition, they have continued to produce plenty of new/original content as well. Did you enjoy Raya and the Last Dragon or Encanto? I'm excited for Wish coming out this year as well.
@@Whoaly You do know that not every single Disney fan in the entire world is also a Marvel one, right? 🤨
@@1992disney I do! So are you a Marvel fan or a Disney fan? If you're a Disney fan as I would assume by you're name, why do you believe that Disney has wrecked Marvel? I guess I might understand your point more if you were coming at this as a Marvel fan from before Disney acquired them.
🥺
Bob Iger is a legend. His incredible business acumen and deep-seated appreciation for creatives redefine what it means to be an effective business executive. He has made some difficult and controversial decisions since returning to Disney, but I'm elated to see him return.
LOL Iger destroyed Disney and turned it into a soulless money making machine. Pretty much he did what ever it took to make money and cheapened the Disney brand...leaving behind creativity and high standards. It was Michael Eisner, the one before Iger, who put art, creativity, and high standards into Disney. All of the junk live action remake is trying to make a cheap buck from Disney's hey day (under Micheal Eisner). Please look into the history please. Nothing Disney done after Iger's takeover has been creative, celebrating the arts, or have high standards. All of the cheap CGI's marvel crap is in poor quality including the soundtrack.
Agreed! I'm glad we have someone to steady the ship on Disney's 100th.
bot
@@HolyRamanRajya i'm a T-800. Cyberdyne Systems Model 101. cybernetic organism. living tissue over a metal endoskeleton.
But sarcasm aside, what are your specific thoughts on the discussion ?
@@Whoaly His is the era that objectifies and commodifies minority groups for money and partakes in rainbow captalsm. We no longer have Buffy or Xena, instead the formula is used to replace successful whitemen content which got successful not because coincidental whitemen but because they were good. I have to use the whitemen term even though I am not one.
Nothing wrong with affirmative action, it understandably reduces quality a bit but its the just thing to do and ideally it should be set at the government level. Disney however picks the minority unskilled kids of their privileged families to star in their content and the quality drops off a cliff.
All their content nowadays have this favoritism policy either on the protagonist or important supporting characters. Ms Marvel and Black Panther could have been so good without the favoritism but nah. Bob Iger might not be the first to do this twisted reservation but he has certainly made it successful.
There's all awesome at disney Bob iger He is cool
You poor child😔
This man is so amazing.
Actually, he's ANYTHING but that. 🤡
LOL he definitely is amazing at making a cheap buck. He literally cheapened Disney's brand after his take over from Micheal Eisner. If you do some research on Eisner, you will realize that under Iger, all Disney did was tried to capitalized on what Micheal Eisner did by doing the live remake. All of the remake so far is in poor quality with horrible CGI. I will give you that, that Iger is a business man and would do what ever it takes to make more money and grow Disney without focusing on the arts, quality, and being creative.
@@beycarter1860 Exactly. He's the sole reason why Disney's ruined. That's why he needs to go ASAP.
@@beycarter1860 Also with Eisner he gave us the 90s Disney resurgence. But in the 00s things went south and basically went greedy and fire Roy E. Disney without even telling him. AT least he came back to fix up what Chapek did terribly.
@@rawyld Exactly! I'm sure we're all grateful for the 90s renaissance but Eisner lost his footing towards the end of his run there. Home on the Range anyone ? I'm glad we have someone to steady the ship for the 100th anniversary.
he woken disney
time to woke
This should be on how to ruin a company
Whart should be on how to ruin a company ?
The guy who saved Disney!
LOL Iger destroyed Disney and turned it into a soulless money making machine. Pretty much he did what ever it took to make money and cheapened the Disney brand...leaving behind creativity and high standards. It was Michael Eisner, the one before Iger, who put art, creativity, and high standards into Disney. All of the junk live action remake is trying to make a cheap buck from Disney's hey day (under Micheal Eisner). Please look into the history please. Nothing Disney done after Iger's takeover has been creative, celebrating the arts, or have high standards. All of the cheap CGI's marvel crap is in poor quality including the soundtrack.
@@beycarter1860 Michael Eisner had his time in the renaissance for sure but unfortunately, he really couldn't do it himself without a Frank Wells. Eisner almost killed Disney's future with Pixar with his feud with Steve Jobs. Speaking of "leaving behind creativity and high standards" and "trying to make a cheap buck from Disney's hey day", who was it that commissioned cheap direct to vhs sequels to popular Disney animated films because they couldn't think of anything else in the first place? Return of Jafar anybody? Parks also received less investment after the Euro Disney failure. Iger was responsible for the revival era of the Disney Animated Canon, which personally, brought me back into the fold as a lapse Disney fan. I can understand if you're not a Marvel or Star Wars fan, but you're telling me Up, Coco, Frozen, Zootopia, Inside Out, Moana, never struck a cord with you ? That they were made by a soulless money making machine with no appreciation for art, creativity or high standards? These films are as good if not better than the Renaissance/Pixar Golden Age films. To be fair, I don't actually dislike Eisner, (the only Disney CEO I would probably actively dislike is Chapek), but I think your statement is unfair. So Please, look into the history please.
@@Whoaly Well, Up, Coco, Pixar was mainly part of the Pixar Productions which Steve Jobs built. Yes, Bob Iger's best move business wise is buying Pixar. However, instead of building up the original company, he has to acquire companies. Pixar made a bunch of flops under Iger including all of the Toy Story spin offs. Also, we don't really want to mention the biggest box office (not just Disney but the box office) flop in history loosing the studio nearly 200 million dollars under Iger in 2022 called Strange World. Have you heard of it? I don't think so because NOBODY saw it LOL! You only named a few movies. There is a bunch of flops compared to hits under Iger that it would take too long to list here. The movies you listed...only some can be entertaining like any basic formulaic box office movie. However, like I said if you look into it and understand how they create the look, score/music, etc. during the Disney Renaissance days...there was a lot of art, talent, theater, and quality built it. Nice chatting with you.
@@beycarter1860 It's nice to chat with someone familiar with Disney history despite our opposing opinions. I'm sure we could go back and forth regarding renaissance vs revival era. By Toy Story spinoffs, surely you don't mean the sequels? Toy Story 3 is a masterpiece! While 4 may not as been as good, and certainly has some issues, I can't say I didn't leave the theatre with a smile and a bit teary eyed. Call me a sucker I guess. If you mean the short films, well I don't mind those at all, and am in fact a fan of the short films before main feature (though I can understand why some would be annoyed with it). I think I have heard of Strange World.. wasn't that the last film under Bob Chapek that was sent out to die with no marketing budget?
I may have only named a few films, but I could name some more. How many can you name under Eisner besides The Little Mermaid, The Lion King, Beauty and the Beast and Aladdin? Other films did well, but were certainly a decline from the golden five years between 89 and 94. While Hercules, Mulan and even Tarzan were pretty good, they never reached the same heights as those first 5 years. Pocahontas? I like the songs. Hunchback of Notre Dame? I think it may have been my least watched Renaissance VHS. It may be cheating to name Pixar films during this time if we're strictly talking Eisner vs Iger,. But Pixar is, as you mentioned, one of Iger's best business moves. That Pixar influence seeped into the Disney Studio animated films too. Princess and the Frog, Tangled, Wreck-It-Ralph, Big Hero 6, Frozen, Zootopia, Moana, Ralph Breaks the Internet, Frozen II, Raya and the Last Dragon, Encanto. Of course I'm speaking mostly on the animated side here. But if we want to go live action head to head Eisner vs Iger, we could do that as well.
Anyways, at the end of the day, Disney is an entertainment company. They make films among other things. Films are super subjective. We could argue about box office, creativity, or pop culture impact of renaissance or revival films. I can't pretend to understand all the intricacies that goes into an animated production, or the amount of creativity that must go into the writing, animation or musical writing process. So I totally respect your opinion, perhaps you have an edge on me there. You're right, Iger made some flops. John Carter anyone? But I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree as to whom made the most positive impact. Like I mentioned before, I don't hate Eisner. How could I hate the guy who was responsible for some of the best memories of my childhood? I just don't see the flaws you see in Bob Iger though. Anyways, take care fellow Renaissance fan.
@@Whoaly Have a wonderful day ❤
The worst CEO EVER.
Thank you! Yes, Iger is the WORSE CEO EVER!!!!!! HE DESTROYED DISNEY and CHEAPEN it.
2nd
Iger (Bot) 👎 / Brown7 👎
😣
689 dislikes
Funny how he can describe himself how he will/is destroying the most beloved company in the world. Really and pure Evil man.
Fun fact = Time put HItler on his covers more then 10 times, and Mussolini twice. Now it's Iger's turn, tell you all you need to know.
I don't quite understand your grammar, perhaps you could rephrase it? Are you saying he's describing how he "destroyed" the company? Could you give some examples? He has no more "destroyed" the most beloved company in the world than his other two predecessors, Bob Chapek or Michael Eisner. Compared to their respective runs, I think most would agree he's been equal or greater in his contributions to the company. Though I could understand if one had more fondness for Eisner's early years certainly.
By the logic of your fun fact, anyone who has ever been on a Time magazine cover is an evil man? That doesn't seem to quite make sense.
@@Whoaly Gender swapping, Race swapping, Using IP but telling a different story, loosing 62 billions dollar's to the cie value.
If you need more, you're simply not honest in your said "desire" to understand.
Your Time magazine argument is so stupid I burse in laughter, thx for that needed a laugh.
The classical Boomer executive, shows up with full spoon 🥣 and leaves when the Stock Dives, no accountability.