Maag EQ4M Mastering EQ REVIEW!

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 28 авг 2024

Комментарии • 15

  • @nomenneskio_official
    @nomenneskio_official 6 месяцев назад +3

    Hi! First of all I have to say, that I absolutely love your videos. Your focus on modern electronic music makes your channel outstanding in my opinion :)
    May I ask you how you combine the Maag with the Bettermaker Passive EQ? I already have the Maag and think about buying the Bettermaker. Thanks and keeping up that great work!

    • @thismixissick
      @thismixissick  5 месяцев назад +1

      Great hearing so! Absolutely. So they’re really two different EQ’s. The Maag is used in M/S here through the SPL Gemini, tone wise it’s great for adding sub and top end. The PEQ is a clean pulteq type of EQ, so it’s fantastic for tightening up the low end, and the top end lift sounds outstanding.

  • @Standard.Candle
    @Standard.Candle 4 месяца назад

    I've seen this unit in countless videos, and I never understood what made it good, especially for mastering. I thought in mastering you want ultimate precision, and with only 3-4 usable bells at fixed freqs, I thought this was some kind of inside joke LOL. But now I see that those bells are VERY broad, and affect the whole signal, now it seems very useful especially in mid-side processing.
    I'd love to see one of your videos where you walk us through your whole chain A-Z and the philosophy of your choices. Keep up the good work, I find your videos very informative and I love your music selection :)

    • @thismixissick
      @thismixissick  4 месяца назад +1

      You’re absolutely right! The sub and air bands, especially, are outstanding. If I need to do something super precise, I’ll use another EQ. Great idea on the chain walkthrough!

  • @johnnyvegas2015
    @johnnyvegas2015 6 месяцев назад

    Awesome...i just got one and will try to use in the MS mode...thanks for sharing your knowledge

    • @thismixissick
      @thismixissick  6 месяцев назад

      Great to hear. I’m sure you’ll love it in MS!

  • @user-ng8pi3wy7g
    @user-ng8pi3wy7g 4 месяца назад

    Great review, thank you. I am trying to decide between the Maag EQ4M or getting a second EQ4 500. I am learning about 'headroom' and understand that the EQ4M has more headroom (29db) than the EQ4 (25db). I don't quite understand headroom enough yet to know whether the 25db is considered good or sufficient. I wondered whether this is what you were referring to at the start of the walkthrough. Thanks in advance.

    • @thismixissick
      @thismixissick  4 месяца назад +1

      I would go for the 500 if you plan on mostly using it on mono sources, and choose the EQ4M if you are looking to use it on the master.

    • @user-ng8pi3wy7g
      @user-ng8pi3wy7g 4 месяца назад

      @@thismixissick That is a good suggestion. I think I will add the EQ4M for mastering ;)

  • @Kawadaken
    @Kawadaken Месяц назад

    Hi, thank you for your video.Can I use eq4M with SSL fusion’s insert mode?

    • @thismixissick
      @thismixissick  Месяц назад

      Absolutely! Even better, you can hold the insert button on the Fusion and use the EQ4M in mid/side!

  • @Groove81TV
    @Groove81TV 6 месяцев назад

    Cool lift !

  • @anaisvania
    @anaisvania 6 месяцев назад

    Hi now with the LAAL , you stop using the better maker Mastering Limiter ? or not. thanks

    • @thismixissick
      @thismixissick  6 месяцев назад

      Yes, the LAAL is absolutely outstanding.

  • @alfredcruz9075
    @alfredcruz9075 5 месяцев назад

    P r o m o s m 😻